|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
ramscrota (0)
|
| 1-50 of 54 Posts | Page 1 | 2 | Next Page > |
| 02-21-09 04:51pm - 5782 days | #13 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended  Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I think this is a good decision. I fell foul of an annonymous trust rating, and if sometone felt that way about something I wrote, I'd like to have a reason. | |
|
||
| 02-18-09 06:09am - 5785 days | #4 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
It gets me that there are sites which still do this. They seem to have little concept of how detrimental it is to their sales. They need to read remarks on this topic by others on PU. | |
|
||
| 02-18-09 06:04am - 5785 days | #14 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Can't say I'm a sociological expert on this kinda stuff. But I do know that this kind of set 'formula' approach annouy me - it's not only in the clothing, but in the way they do the moves in the scenes, the positions and the cumshots. That's one reason I prefer amateur sites, but my one gripe about amateur sites is that they seem to attract amateur clothing, amateur sets & scenery, and amateur photographers & videographers. Why can't the amateur girls 'dress up to the nines?' And why can't they put more effort into making the settings & decor attractive and colourful? That's my beef. And toadsith has raised a good point. | |
|
||
| 02-14-09 11:11pm - 5789 days | #13 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I like a mix of slight kink, seduction, and colour. 3 of my favourites: little mutt, teen pink video, & wired pussy. | |
|
||
| 02-14-09 11:08pm - 5789 days | #13 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Q:Why isn't POV more popular? A: 'Cos it's rubbish. I only once joined a POV site. exploited Teens - never again!!!! What a shocker!!!! Edited on Feb 14, 2009, 11:13pm | |
|
||
| 02-14-09 11:02pm - 5789 days | #19 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I totally agree, jd 1961. I don;t know what kind of MR they do, but they clearly don't ask you or me. I believe the art of tease and seduction is dying, and sadly neglected by Porn sites. The best site I've seen for seductive quality is little mutt (a lesbian site). I wish they'd bring the same seductive qualities to a hetero site. I tend to like pics, but I've come to the conclusion that most porn photographers are as dumb as dogshit. See my article on photography in this forum. | |
|
||
| 02-11-09 05:50am - 5792 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
The Cum shot is the point to which many porn scenes build towards. Standard etiquette seems to demand that the girl orgasms first, and then the guy cums (usually over her tits or in her mouth). This is counter to most real-life sex, where the guy almost invariably cums first. But that aside, what do you like and hate most in cum shots? My preferences are: holding steady (if the cock is waved around, you can't see the cum come out), lots of it, an active squirt, and the lady finishing the guy off (especially by mouth) My pet hates are: the guy pumping his own pud, weak payloads (eg a few drops of pathetic clear fluid - they should bring the dick back in 3 days and make him shoot it again), and worst of all, fake cum. What do others think? | |
|
||
| 02-11-09 05:32am - 5792 days | #6 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
The 'fuckers' as you put it are Naked Novices - this was the main sign-up site. Can't recall the names of the other sites; on of the credit companies actually reunded me when I complained. Interestingly, the other review of Naked Novices gave similar comments and scrore to mine. | |
|
||
| 02-11-09 05:18am - 5793 days | #12 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Hi toadsith - I'll follow up your suggestions; it's helpful to know. One 'fetish' I have with pics is to look at them as I DL - watching them appear gradually is a bit like watching the girl strip. | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 01:50pm - 5797 days | #7 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Hi picdude - that's helpful to know! I've got the latest opera as well, and the problem persists! I suspect I've got some bug on the system, and I might have to take it to the computer doctor to get it cleaned out. | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 01:43pm - 5797 days | #4 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Hi turboshaft - you raised some really good points! Re the high heels: they are one of my pet hates! They bugger up a girl's posture, deportment, and make movement awkward. To me, the sexiness of a girl depends upon good posture, figure presentation and ease of movement. The ONLY type of scene I can accept HHs in is a secreetary type scene, and even then they should get rid of them early in the scene. Re your other points: you mention the fact that often things look uncomfortable for the couple. I agree, and I think for the sex to be convincing, they need to be comfortable. | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 04:28am - 5798 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I'm curious to get the thoughts of others on this. My gripe has to do with how, in porn scenes, they 'manufacture' angles so you (the viewer) can see the various bits. Eg, in a BG scene, how the guy sets himself at an angle to the girl (not front on) so you can see his cock making entry. Two obvious results from this: 1. The guy's cock usually only enters halfway. Any further in, and his torso would ne too close, and would block the view. 2. It looks phoney, laboured, and lacking in erotic appeal. The most common positions for this seem to be doggie and missionary. In those positions I much prefer the guy to lean forward, and envelope the girl in his arms - play with her boobs (doggie) or tongue kiss her (missionary). In these positions, you know his member has made full entry, a far bigger turn-on than the staged look I refered to above. I think that close-ups are best done in certain positions (such as girl on top - camera from behind, reverse cowgirl or spooner), and I wish the vid people would stop trying to 'manufacture' views which look false and phoney Have close ups by all means; in fact, the close-ups are the icing on the cake. But surely it's best to do the close-ups using poitions which are best suited for them. What do others think? | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 04:13am - 5798 days | #57 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I think one niche site that needs to be added is a'No niche site'. I am tired of the plethora of sites which feature shaved (which I can't stand), hairy (usually with more hair than King King), boobs (everything focusses on the boobs), feet (where's the turn on in that?), cameltoe (a lovely feature, but what an ugly name!), etc, etc, etc. The problem with many niche sites is that the niche theme becomes a limitation. For example, I prefer my girls with a good bush of pubic hair. But many hairy sites have ape-women with growth bursting out of every oriface and gap imaginable. The bottom line for me is two things: what's done should be done well, and variety is the spice of life. Very few sites seem to concern themselves too mcuh with these basics of human life. | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 09:59am - 5805 days | #4 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
All my broswers are doing it - Opera, firefox, and explorer | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 02:15am - 5806 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Can someone help me with a technical question? I've recently updated my web browsers. But now, instead of gradually downloading the pics, where they gradually fill the page, nothing happens until the whole download is complete. I much prefer the older way - where you get a gradual filling up. Does anyone knopw how to change my browser settings to change back? I really appreciate the help. | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 02:11am - 5806 days | #37 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
A few of my favourites are: Venus (just oozing with sexuality) Sarah Stone Voluptuous model with tits like wrecking balls) Maya Hills (delightful, innocent model who seems addicted to being undressed and ravished by horny men & women) Edited on Feb 05, 2009, 10:45pm | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 01:56am - 5806 days | #10 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Interesting on the most recent survey that more than half the respondants indicated they felt they were porn addicts, and they didn't care! That's the spirit! | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 01:46am - 5806 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I'm sure many of us have come across scams, rip-offs, and other unethical operators with porn sites. I want to make people aware of one I come across recently. I joined a 3-day trial membership. It was a rubbish site, so I cancelled almost immediately. But upon joining, I was inundated with emails form other sites saying that I had a 3 day 'free' membership to their sites. But after 3 days, I would be billed for these sites. Not wishing to be billed multiples of US$30, I worked through them all and cancelled. There was nothing in the site's terms and conditions about this kind of thing. Now some of the sites did not acknowldge my cancellation, and the next month I found myself being billed for sites I had never heard of. Fortunately, one the credit company has agreed to refund my money. Can I name these sites? And what experience other members had of these kinds of scams? Can we compile a list (or submit the names to Khan) of sites and credit companies to at least be investigated? | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 01:29am - 5806 days | #19 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Re squirrel's original post: I'm relatively new to this site, and it took me a little while to get used to a site where people did such comprehensive reviews. I had previously come from a site like Sir Rodney's where SR makes the review, and contributers simply comment. The comments are almost invariably short, to the point ones like: "What a site! Tits bouncing everywhere, but the dude behind the camera is a jerk. He should shut up". or, "This site sux. I don't know why SR rated as high as he did - crap vids, craps pics, crap layout. Don't do your dough on this one." I'm trying now, in my reviews, to be comprehensive in my comments about navigation, vid & pics quality, type of scenes, etc. But I also try to include stuff about the erotic 'feel' of a site - allowing, of course, for the fact that tastes vary. So I think the challenge in writing a review is trying to create an accurate impression of a which leaves room for people's differences. eg: "This site is the greatest! You have to join" doesn't say much, whereas, "Attractive girls, bright surroundings, and sensitively and thoughtfully photographed. If you like young amateurs, I can recommend this site." says a whole lot more. Edited on Jan 29, 2009, 01:36am | |
|
||
| 01-13-09 05:38pm - 5821 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Do we have any female members on this site? If so, I'm interested in why - your sexual orientation, are you curious about what makes us guys tick, etc. | |
|
||
| 01-13-09 05:33pm - 5821 days | #101 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
New, Improved ramscrota avitar. I've said before that I don't think frequent changes of avitars is good. But I've slightly tweaked mine - improved the grin, etc. Essentialy the same. | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 06:45am - 5828 days | #7 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
The only one I've seen recently is 1 by day. Also, David Lace would do it as well. I agree, ponchoo - it's something that pisses me off too. I think that for the woman to finish the uy off (by mouth or by hand) is far more erotic that the guy (usually taking forever) to pump his own pud. | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 06:36am - 5828 days | #6 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
My parents avoided getting married on July 4th, by marrying on Monday instead of Saturday. | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 06:27am - 5828 days | #49 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
DRM sucks. I've reserved my worst reviews for DRM sites, and if a site won't let me download vids & pics, I don't join;. Simple as that. | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 06:15am - 5828 days | #23 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I like the concept of a solo model site - such as the focus on a particular model as she develops, etc - the whole sense of building up a relationship with her. That said, I've been a member of a numbor of such sites, and I've yet to find one that was any good. They seem to ignore most porn basics - such as the need for easy navigation, good quality pic & vid sets; model presenting a vivacious persona, etc. I was on one recently in which the model was attractive, the pics sets were reasonably well done, but the model never smiled, and looked bored most of the time. How she could expect to gain a following with such a sour-puss attitude is beyond me. | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 06:08am - 5828 days | #19 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I agree with MargulisAZ. I think there's a vast difference between, say, the Kink sites and what he described. Sex should be totally consentual, and should be fun. | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 05:57am - 5828 days | #45 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Probably the best scope for new niches lies in some kind of humour. To show you there are no limits to human imagination, I was once a member of a site called 'BottleRocket Babes'. The pics were woeful, and the vids were poor, but they had a fun element. The a couple would be having sex, showing all the usual stuff we get in porn (sucking, f#cking, etc). towards the end of each scene, the next door neighbour, Duckballs, would come over and complain about the noise. (We never actually saw Duckballs, we only saw the participant arguing with him through the door.) The lady would then fire a skyrocket at Duckballs - OUT OF HER PUSSY! (I am not kidding - they must have had a small protective tube inserted). This 'rocket attack' would usually send Duckballs packing. This humour was the site's saving grace - without it they wouldn't have had much custom at all. Edited on Jan 06, 2009, 06:01am | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 05:31am - 5828 days | #5 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Never. I've always [lanned to do what you're doing, but never had the discipline. | |
|
||
| 01-05-09 06:07pm - 5829 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
This question arose because of various comments in the reviews and other forum topics. One thing I look for is what I call a good sense of erotic taste. I know this varies greatly, and can boil down to a person's own taste. But allowing for this, I think there is a common denomiator of good quality in porn. It also varies between pics and vids. For example, posture/pose is vital in a convicing pic set, but in a vid, movement is more important. But allowing for this, I'd like to give a few thoughts on what I think 'good erotic taste' is. 1. TEASE & EXCITEMENT The scene should tease, whet your appitite, lead you on, and satisfy you shortly before the end. Tha's why, as a lover of pic sets, I hate it when after, say 4 fully clothed shots, they show a fully spread pussy in pic 5. The build-up and tease has been ruined. 2. NOT TOO LONG The scene should not be too long. I prefer vid scenes of 15-20 minutes, or pic scenes of 100 pics (solo strip) or 150 pics (BG of GG) unless it's damned good. Better a scene be too short, and leave you wanting more (providing the point of satisifaction has been reached), that it be too long, and leave you wondering when it's going to end 3. POINT OF SATISFACTION Put simply, it's the point at which the shoot's goal is achieved. In a solo pic shoot, it's when you see everything, including some full pussy spreads. In a BG scene, it's usually when the guy cums (after the girl cums, usually), etc. I don't see these as hard and fast rules, but they are a good guideline. I mean, what's the point of a scene if the guy cums in thE second minute, and they spend the rest of the time reading a book?) 4. DECOR & SURROUNDINGS Decor is important. lively, bright and colouful surroundings stimulate the mind, and add to the sensual experience. It varies of course - a scene for teens doing their first porn scene might have bright, cheerful colours, whereas a high-class sseduction scene might feature softer ;ight, ornate drapes, and classy bedclothes. But too many sites have tacky, grotty and messy settings, and usually the photography or videography is of similar quality. You can only get away with this if it is an obviously high-class woman being seduced, say, by the hunky motor mechanic in his greasy, messy garage. 5. SHOOTING AGNLES Shots should vary between close-up and the whole scene. one thing that annoys me (both pics and vids) is where they use sex positions with the sole purpose of displaying the woman's spread pussy (The reverse cowgirl position is OK, because it still allows good movement, and her tits to dounce up and down. But the spooner position has a heap of problems. It's difficult for the couple to appear genuinely erotically absorbed in each other in this position, and cramps movement.) In solo pics, some photographers coninually make the mistake of shooting from above the girl, and shooting totally front on. Not a good angle (see my article about good and bad photography) 6. UNCONVINCING STANDARD FORMULAS Many scenes, even in better quality sites, go through standard formulas, such as the woman squirming and running her hands over her (unexposed) breasts, or 'stabbing', or oral done with a series of single licks. Totally unconvincing; that's why I like amateur models, because they tend not to use these practised formulas. Their nervous excitement shows through, and enhances the erotic feel of the shoot. These are a few points, and I make the greatest possible alloance for the fact that people have different tastes. Eg I'm don't like stilletoes, because they ruin a girls posture, and reduce her mobility. For me, the woman can only be convicing erotically if she's fully mobile. But some scenes may call for stilletoes - eg secretary scenes. However, I was a member of one site which had most other things right - decor, surroundings, lovely models, etc. But they opted for standard formulas, and one of them dictated that no matter where the girl was, she had to wear f*cking stilletoes - in the lounge, by the pool (get real!) or walking in the forest fir Christ's sake! (get real x 2!!). The site had me for one shoot, but lost me after 5. Comments anyone? | |
|
||
| 01-05-09 04:18pm - 5829 days | #24 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Great reply, pat362. Shouls I put that on a business card, with an appropriate picture? | |
|
||
| 01-04-09 02:22am - 5831 days | #21 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Interesting remarks. I totally agree with the remarks about limp dicks. Makes you wonder of they've been wanking or screwing all night before, and can't get it up. You'd think the prom producers would tell them to refrain from sex/masturbation for 3 days before the scene! Or, call ME in! I'm not the best looking guy, but I know I could keep a stiffy with some of those women sucking it! Edited on Feb 11, 2009, 05:39am (ramscrota: evil-dick spelling) | |
|
||
| 01-04-09 02:16am - 5831 days | #8 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I joined one, because I was not aware that it was non nude. It was a complete dog. | |
|
||
| 01-01-09 01:31am - 5834 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Which internet browser do people like to use? I have tried explorer and firefox, but so far I have found opera the best, as it gives best control over picture size. What do others use? | |
|
||
| 01-01-09 01:29am - 5834 days | #5 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I agree, Denner. Close-ups should only run for a few shots, and then take in the whole perspective for a few shots. You need to keep in touch with the whole persona of the model. | |
|
||
| 01-01-09 01:26am - 5834 days | #8 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I think what is suggested is desireable, but there would be problems with it. It might make this site a sitting duck for libel or legal action. But I think there's a need for it. I joined a site recently, and not only were there pop-ups galore, I found I was given 'free' membership to 3 or 4 others sites, without approving it. These 'free membership lasted only a few days, after which I would be charged $39 per month. I had to slog through all the emails, and cancel my membership to all these sites. I think these kinds of practices need to be dealt with. | |
|
||
| 01-01-09 01:20am - 5834 days | #6 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Yes, someone knows who that is. But not me. | |
|
||
| 01-01-09 01:16am - 5834 days | #16 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Boredom is a very real factor. I've certianly got sick of the way sites do things, but it doesn't alter my overall opinion of a site. I got sick of 1 by day, but that didnp;t alter my opinion that it's one of the bets site's I've ever seen. That's why I change my sites every month, in the same way a ram likes to change ewes. | |
|
||
| 01-01-09 01:11am - 5834 days | #18 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Interesting question, The Rizzo. Solo girl sites is a concept I like, because you can build up a familiarity with a model. The limits, obviously, are you only get that one model (and maybe a few friends). You would think that the site producers would therefore realize that they need to make things as HQ as possible. But I have found this lesson is lost on most solo girl sites. I have been a member of a number of these sites,, and have not yet come across one that was much good. My ideal solo girl site would have: 1. A model who is engaging and smiles a lot (not necessarilly absurdly attravtive) 2. A Well organized range of HQ photo shoots abnd videos. I'm not necessarilly after HC, but perhaps a range of situations (eg strip, nature, GG, etc). A starting numebr needs to be around 50 pics sets, and 30 vids. 3. A good forum never goes astray. My preference would also be for the model to have a degree of innocent, amateur charm, but not always. | |
|
||
| 01-01-09 12:58am - 5834 days | #22 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Interesting question, Colm4. I prefer pics, for a few reasons. 1. Immediacy - you can get them straight away, instead of waiting 3 hrs for a DL 2. Far better resolution 3. I prefer the solo girl strip, which comes off far better as a photoshoot. also, a good pic set (when pics & vids are available of each scene) gives an idea of whether or not a cnee is any good. My ideal is HQ pics with HQ vids. I look at the pics while I DL them, but I keep the vid for later. I rarely look at pics after I DL them. My own quirky habits, I guess. But I am very fussy about my pic quality (see my article about good & and photography). Thanks for asking the question - good of you to ask about why others like something that is clearly not your preference. Show a broadminded attitude - well done! | |
|
||
| 12-31-08 04:31am - 5835 days | #8 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
PS Monahan, I love your avitar! | |
|
||
| 12-31-08 04:30am - 5835 days | #7 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Interesting question, and I think monahan has made some really good observations about the changing times. I think these days it is very different. In past decades, is was a shameful thing, but nowadays, I think its seen almost as a 'cool' way for young women to earn a bit of money and have a bit of an exciting aventure as well. I think these are the kinds of girls who get attracted to amateur sites, and some move on and become porn stars | |
|
||
| 12-31-08 04:18am - 5835 days | #16 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I agree smoker00. Worst of all are the posed gg scenes (pics). But In a scene (BG or GG the two or 3 lovers should be totally engrossed in each other, not the, as you say, the 'friggen' camera. The only exceptions are the solo girl shoots. | |
|
||
| 12-31-08 04:11am - 5835 days | #5 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
By the way, pat362, I love your avitar. Where is it from? It looks like a Dr Seuss Creature! | |
|
||
| 12-31-08 04:09am - 5835 days | #4 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Interesting to read your remarks. I agtree about the anal gapes - if theres' one thing I didn't like about the 1 by day site, it was that. Otherwise a great site. | |
|
||
| 12-31-08 04:05am - 5835 days | #2 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I tend never to go for NYRs. I prefer to set goals. And one of my goals it to watch as much good porn as possible, and have as much good sex (and some bad!) as possible! | |
|
||
| 12-30-08 06:40pm - 5835 days | #3 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I agree PInkPanther. I like a bit of make-up, but only to enhance the model's natural features. It seems the best hunting gorund would be the amateur sites. The problem with most amateur sites is that many of the WMs are fairly amateur as well. It doesn't sem to occur to them that although the girls are not professional, a convicning shoot requires just as much care and preofessionalsim on the photographer's part as does a site with professional models. Some sites (both amateur and professional) pay very poor attention to such basics as set-up, decor & surroundings, lighting, etc. TheRizzo is right in suggesting Karups. But take care - the main site in overloaded with tons of old pics and poor navigation. Karups has a range of sites, and I found it a better bet to go for the more niche sites under the Karpus umbrella, such as hairy or exotics. Might be also a good idea to refer to the reviews for such site as Abby Winters, Girls Out West, Nubiles, FemJoy, etc. All these sites are good, but have their limitations. | |
|
||
| 12-30-08 06:29pm - 5835 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I mean the worst one you've seen, not the worst one you've taken part in! What is the worst porn scene you've ever viewed? It might be a scene where everything went wrong, or was so ridiculous as to be laughable, or just plain absurdly crass. Don't mention the site, just describe the scene. Some scenes are just plain bad. But there are also some genres that give rise to ordinary scenes. One of my dislikes is POV. The fact that the dude is usually videoing himself as he comes is a recipe for disaster. I'll start the ball rolling. This one was an outdoors anal entry. Lovely model, well-built stud with a large shlong. So far so good. But in the close-ups, you could see flies buzzing around the girl's butt-hole! Hardly something to inspire rampant lust! | |
|
||
| 12-30-08 06:16pm - 5835 days | #96 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
It's interesting that this discussion topic has generated more responss than any other topic. It's good for an avitar can have a connection with the username, but this is not a hsrd and fast rule. One of the funiest avitars I saw was on Girls Out West, where a user calling himself 'Fanicer" had an avitar of an old genleman toad with a cane. In my case, a picture of a ram's scrotum would be the ideal pic. But I think it might be a bit crass, given this site's rules. So I decided on a ram's head. My previous avitar was a cross-looking black pig, and I guess I could have change my name to 'crosspig" I like my avitars to be funny. And that presetned a problem. Ram's faces tend not to be very expressive, so I added a comical grin to my ram's head. I'm still decideg whether to go mack to the pig, and use the name "crosspig" | |
|
||
| 12-30-08 07:30am - 5835 days | #47 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
One vital point about reviews is they must include comments about the QUALITY of the material. By this, I don't just mean the lighting, etc, but whether the photoraphers / videographers have got a genuine sense of the erotic, or whether they seem to be following repetitive standard formulas. For example, I prefer pubis hair, but the real problem is thst most photographers seems to know jackshit about how to photograph a pussy, shaved or not. Regarding bonus material: I tend to be suspicious of sites that mave truckloads of bonus material - it's usually an indication that their core material is fairly crappy. I prefer less material of HQ, rather than heaps of mediocre rubbish. | |
|
||
| 12-30-08 07:15am - 5835 days | #9 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
Hi lk2fireone! Thanks for your reply! I've aleays loved pigs- especially great big black ones! I'll likae your suggestion on, though, and look for a slightly more cheerful looking one! | |
|
||
| 1-50 of 54 Posts | Page 1 | 2 | Next Page > |
|
