Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: LKLK (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1583)  |   Threads Started (352)

1501-1550 of 1583 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 8 14 20 30 Page 31 32 Next Page >

10-30-19  12:46pm - 1786 days #50
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Originally Posted by FreddieAdmin:


However, for the end of the year, keep an eye out for a Member of the Year survey! You guys will vote for who was the most active member. The rules will be listed soon alongside a link a survey.


I think a better award would be the best review of the month survey.

Or a best review of the 2-3-4-whatever best review of the months survey.

Quality over quantity.
Best reviews are more meaningful than how active a member might be.

Just my opinion.

And trying to analyze or rank member contributions to the site is difficult, to say the least.
Whereas, ranking the value of a review is simpler.
Not simple, but simpler than trying to figure out how much a member contributes to the PU site.

10-29-19  10:12pm - 1787 days #1476
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Scum Democrats are using an unfair impeachment process to bully our wonderful President and Commander in Chief.
The Dems should be lynched without a trial: they are traitors to the US.
Republicans rally around President Trump, who will lead our country to greatness.
-----
-----
Dems unveil impeachment procedures; GOP calls process unfair

The Associated Press
MATTHEW DALY
Oct 29th 2019 9:38PM

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats unveiled legislation Tuesday authorizing the next phase of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump as Democrats move to nullify complaints from Trump and his Republican allies that the impeachment process is illegitimate and unfair.

An eight-page resolution calls for open hearings and requires the House Intelligence Committee to submit a report outlining its findings and recommendations, with a final recommendation on impeachment left to the Judiciary Committee.

Republicans would be allowed to request subpoenas, but such requests would ultimately be subject to a vote by the full committee, which Democrats control as the House majority.

Democratic Rep. James McGovern of Massachusetts, the chairman of the House Rules Committee, said the resolution provides "a clear path forward" as the House begins a public phase of the impeachment inquiry, which up to this point has largely consisted of closed-door interviews.

"This is a sad time for our country," McGovern said. "None of us came to Congress to impeach a president, but each of us took a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution."

"The president's Republican allies in Congress have tried to hide the president's conduct, but the American people will now see the facts firsthand," he added.

White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said the resolution merely "confirms that House Democrats' impeachment has been an illegitimate sham from the start as it lacked any proper authorization by a House vote."

The resolution "does nothing to change the fundamental fact that House Democrats refuse to provide basic due process rights to the administration," she said, adding that the White House is barred from participating at all until after the intelligence panel "conducts two rounds of one-sided hearings to generate a biased report for the Judiciary Committee."

Separate language covering Judiciary proceedings allows for Trump and his lawyers to attend all Judiciary presentations and hearings. Trump's lawyers will be allowed to question any witness, according to a copy of the proposed Judiciary proceedings obtained by The Associated Press. The president can call witnesses if the committee agrees the testimony is "necessary or desirable to a full and fair record in the inquiry," the three-page document says.

The Judiciary language is expected to be incorporated into the larger resolution before the House votes on impeachment proceedings Thursday.

The impeachment inquiry is looking into Trump's July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in which he asked for a "favor" — to investigate a Democratic rival for president. Democrats say the request and other actions by the administration to push Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his family amounted to a quid pro quo for important military aid for Ukraine, providing sufficient grounds for impeachment.

The House is expected to vote on the resolution Thursday amid complaints from Trump and his Republicans allies that the monthlong impeachment process is illegitimate and unfair.

Minority Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the No. 2 House Republican, denounced what he called a "Soviet-style impeachment process" led by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

More than 75% of House members have been unable to view what is happening in closed-door depositions conducted by the Intelligence panel and two other committees, Scalise said. "That represents more than 230 million Americans whose voices are denied right now," he said.

Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, the No. 3 House Republican, said Democrats "have basically cooked up a process they have been conducting in secret" with the goal of preventing Trump's lawyers from asking questions of witnesses.

Democrats "are now attempting to sort of put a cloak of legitimacy around this process by saying they're going to bring it to a vote on the floor," Cheney said. "They can't fix it. The process is broken. It's tainted."

Democrats insisted they were not yielding to Republican pressure and dismissed a GOP argument that impeachment can't begin without a formal House vote.

Schiff and other Democrats defended the process and said the American people will soon hear from witnesses in an open setting, with transcripts of depositions already conducted set for public release.

"The evidence we have already collected paints the picture of a president who abused his power by using multiple levers of government to press a foreign country to interfere in the 2020 election," Schiff and three other committee chairs said in a statement Tuesday.

Following in the footsteps of previous impeachment inquiries, the next phase will move from closed depositions to open hearings, "where the American people will learn firsthand about the president's misconduct," the Democrats said.

__

Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

10-29-19  06:21pm - 1787 days #11
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
RagingBuddhist, are you outing rearadmiral as a female in disguise?

The truth comes out, at last.
I've had my doubts about him.

On a side note: it's not only women who can stuff large toys in their bum.

My advice to rearadmiral: Practice makes perfect.




PS: Spam wars are counter-productive.

10-29-19  12:06pm - 1787 days #154
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Freddie, you need to check the software for the raffle.
UMBA8 did not post a review for that was eligible for this week's raffle.
His last review was posted 10-22-19 08:30am, when it was eligible for last week's raffle.

10-29-19  03:58am - 1787 days #1475
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
President Trump says a terrorist died screaming and crying.
But US officials aren't sure how the president learned this.
Don't US officials know that Trump, our president, the greatest president the US has ever had, has a direct connection to God, and knows much more than any other US official?
That Trump can hear the thoughts and sounds of every enemy and friend?
However, in reporting how the craven terrorist died, Trump is sending a message to everyone: Be very scared to be an enemy of the United States.
The truth will set you free.
Or send you to hell.
--------
--------
Trump says al-Baghdadi died 'screaming and crying.' U.S. officials aren't sure how he knows that.

Yahoo News
Dylan Stableford
Oct 28th 2019 4:09PM

While announcing the killing of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, President Trump described the terrorist’s death during the U.S. raid in unusually graphic detail — repeatedly claiming that al-Baghdadi died “whimpering, screaming and crying.” But a top U.S. official who watched the raid with Trump in the White House Situation Room said he’s not sure where the president got that information.

“I don’t know what the source of that was,” Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon Monday.

Trump announced al-Baghdadi’s death in a televised statement from the White House on Sunday morning, a day after U.S. forces carried out the operation in Syria.

“He died like a dog, he died like a coward,” Trump said. “He died after running into a dead-end tunnel, whimpering and crying and screaming all the way.

“The thug who tried so hard to intimidate others spent his last moments in utter fear, in total panic and dread,” the president added.

An actual dog used by U.S. forces in the raid was slightly wounded, officials said. Milley said the animal is recovering and will return to duty with its handler.

Trump told reporters that he watched the raid from the Situation Room as it was carried out in real time with Milley, Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Vice President Mike Pence, among others. The White House later released an official photo of the president and the top defense officials taken in the Situation Room.

“It was something really amazing to see,” the president said, adding that it was “as though you were watching a movie.”

According to the New York Times, the Situation Room had live overhead surveillance footage of the operation. But the feeds did not have audio, nor did they show what was happening in the underground tunnel where al-Baghdadi was killed.

Appearing on ABC’s “This Week,” Esper said he wasn’t sure where Trump got “whimpering” from, either.

“I don’t have those details,” Esper said, adding that the president “probably had the opportunity to talk to the commanders on the ground.”

After announcing al-Baghdadi’s death, Trump said it was important to describe his last moments in vivid terms so as to deter would-be ISIS fighters.

“Frankly, I think it’s something that should be brought out so that his followers and all of these young kids that want to leave various countries, including the United States, they should see how he died,” Trump said. “He didn’t die a hero. He died a coward — crying, whimpering, screaming.”

_____

10-28-19  01:17am - 1788 days #1474
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Is Donald Trump a sadist?
Was he smiling and clapping when he heard loud boos and chants of "Lock him up" at the World Series?
Does Trump want to go to jail?

Enquiring minds want to know...
------
------
Trump showered with boos, chants of 'lock him up' at World Series game
The president, who was there with first lady Melania Trump, stood smiling and clapping throughout.
Trump greeted with loud boos after being introduced at World Series

Oct. 27, 2019, 7:16 PM PDT / Updated Oct. 27, 2019, 7:39 PM PDT
By Richie Duchon

President Donald Trump was greeted with a chorus of boos and chants of "Lock him up!" along with some cheers on Sunday night as he was introduced at Nationals Park in Washington, D.C., during the team's third World Series home game against the Houston Astros.

Trump, who was there with first lady Melania Trump, stood smiling and clapping throughout.

Some fans broke out into chants of "Lock him up!" after Trump was shown on the stadium's big screen during a moment to honor a group of Marines.

Trump made the appearance the same day he announced the killing by U.S. forces of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. "Last night, the United States brought the world's No. 1 terrorist leader to justice," Trump said. "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is dead."
Image: U.S. President Donald Trump recognizes U.S. military personnel as the Washington Nationals and Houston Astros play in Game 5 of the World Series in Washington.

The announcement afforded the president a political win as he faces an intensifying impeachment inquiry led by House Democrats over his dealings with Ukraine. Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Oversight committees are looking into whether Trump abused his powers by withholding $250 million in military aid to Ukraine in exchange for an investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son that would benefit the president politically.

The chants against the president harked back to campaign rallies in 2016 during which fans of Trump would often break into chants of "Lock her up!" in reference to Hillary Clinton.
Image: Richie DuchonRichie Duchon

Richie Duchon is an NBC News digital editor in the Los Angeles bureau.


© 2019 NBC UNIVERSAL

10-28-19  01:08am - 1788 days #4
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


You do know that that was my typical sarcastic commentary on things, right?


I figured you were being sarcastic.
At the same time, I thought there was an element of truth in your idea that toys are popular for cam models.

Since I don't follow cam sites, I have no idea what percentage of the toys are pink, versus other popular colors.

10-27-19  06:24pm - 1789 days #2
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
I've read there was a law that if a porn model does not have a tattoo, commonly called a tramp stamp, she is not a member of the World's Professional Porn Models.

But there is no law that states that porn models, whether webcam or not, needs a toy.
Toys are a voluntary decision, made by the model or the porn director.
Or maybe the model's boyfriend or girlfriend, in case the model wants a bit of extra excitement in her life.

10-26-19  08:30am - 1790 days #3
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Video shows cop shooting and killing an unarmed 16-year-old who was running away.
The cop was justified in the shooting, according to Fresno police department and the city of Fresno's police auditor.

The fatal bullet entered the back of the teenagers head as he was running away.

But police have the right to shoot to kill, in self defense.
The teen might have been running to find a gun, to shoot someone else.
Or, maybe, he might have been running to find a gun, to shoot a cop.
Horrors!
---------
---------
Video shows officer shoot an unarmed 16-year-old as he runs away. Police say it was justified
Eric Levenson

By Sarah Moon and Eric Levenson, CNN

(CNN)Newly released video of a fatal police shooting in April 2017 shows an officer firing a deadly shot at an unarmed 16-year-old who had jumped over a fence and was running away.
Police in Fresno, California, say that three different official departments have ruled the shooting justified.
The surveillance camera footage, provided by attorney Stuart Chandler, shows 16-year-old Isiah Murrietta Golding climb a fence and enter a small yard as he is being chased by two officers.
Murrietta Golding, wearing a gray sweater, lands on his feet and starts to run. One officer climbs the fence while the other gets into a crouching stance and fires through the fence, the video shows. Murrietta Golding then stumbles and falls to the ground.

In the police body camera footage, also provided by the attorney, someone off camera can be heard saying "good shot."
Murrietta Golding's parents filed separate wrongful death lawsuits against the city of Fresno and several of its officers in March 2018. Chandler, who represents Murrietta Golding's father, said the suits were filed separately because the couple are divorced.
The bullet went through the back of the teen's head, according to the father's lawsuit, and he died three days later. The lawsuit claims the officer who fired had no "objective facts" to believe that Murrietta Golding was armed or reaching for a weapon. The teen was unarmed, the lawsuit states.
"The fact that the police department and the city of Fresno's police auditor all agreed that this shooting was justified is troubling in light of the video that clearly shows that it's not," Chandler told CNN.
Lawsuit: Teen wanted for questioning
Citing police statements, the father's lawsuit says that Murietta Golding was wanted for questioning in connection with a shooting one day earlier that had caused a fatal car crash. Fresno Police sought to question the teenager and pulled over a car in which he was a passenger, the lawsuit states.
The teenagers in the car initially complied with police. But Murietta Golding then took off running, the lawsuit states, leading to the fatal chase.
Fresno Police Chief Andrew Hall told CNN affiliate KSEE that the shooting was ruled justified by police's Internal Affairs Bureau, the Fresno County District Attorney's Office and the City of Fresno's Office of Independent Review.
"The use of lethal force in this case occurred while officers were investigating a homicide. The 16-year-old in this case was involved in the homicide with his brother and the brother was later arrested and pled guilty," Hall said.

"The (surveillance) video represents a different vantage point and was not what the pursuing officers could see. The 16-year-old was also known to carry firearms and had jumped a fence into a child daycare center."
CNN has reached out to the Fresno Police Department and the Office of Independent Review for comment.

10-26-19  07:52am - 1790 days #1473
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Fake news:

President Donald Trump has announced he will resign the presidency.

Says his future will include opening a chain of Golden Arches drive throughs with the brand name: Trumpland, the best meal direct from heaven.

People buying his happy meals will be able to enjoy heavenly blessings along with Coke (deal pending with Coca Cola) and meaty hamburgers (deal pending with China on discounted, non-tarrif meats).

Investors are lining up to invest in Trump's newest venture.
(Since Trump does not invest his own money. He likes to use other peoples' money).

10-25-19  09:56pm - 1791 days #1472
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
President Trump has nothing to hide, nothing to fear.
He is innocent.
Trump is running the Justice Department.
He will have Joe Biden put in prison for serving a false president (Obama was born outside of the US, and was not a legitimate president. Everyone knew this, and Biden made crooked deals to keep Obama in the office of president.)

Mueller is another crook.

But democratic judges are fighting to impeach Trump.
Trump will never give in to the cowardly scum-sucking Democrats.
------
------
Judge: DOJ must give House Mueller grand jury evidence

The Associated Press
ERIC TUCKER
Oct 25th 2019 6:03PM

WASHINGTON (AP) — A judge on Friday ordered the Justice Department to give the House secret grand jury testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, handing a victory to Democrats who want it for the impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump.

The ruling from Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell says that while the department had argued that existing law barred it from sharing the materials with Congress, "DOJ is wrong."

"In carrying out the weighty constitutional duty of determining whether impeachment of the President is warranted, Congress need not redo the nearly two years of effort spent on the Special Counsel's investigation, nor risk being misled by witnesses, who may have provided information to the grand jury and the Special Counsel that varies from what they tell" the House Judiciary Committee, Howell wrote.

Justice Department lawyers argued at a hearing earlier this month that House Democrats already had sufficient evidence from Mueller's investigation, including copies of summaries of FBI witness interviews.

The department had also argued that the House panel didn't have a sufficient explanation for how the material would help in the committee's investigations of Trump, and that impeachment isn't a "judicial proceeding" under the law, for which the information could be disclosed.

___

Associated Press writer Michael Balsamo contributed to this report.

10-25-19  02:54pm - 1791 days #1471
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
President Trump is a man of honor.
He is fighting to have the US government clean house.
Why are there so many criminals hiding in the US government?
Is Joe Biden a criminal?
Is Biden's son a criminal?
Is Robert Mueller a suspect and also a criminal?

Enquiring minds want to know...
-------
-------
Rolling Stone
October 25, 2019 3:04PM ET
Trump Has Officially Weaponized the Justice Department to Go After His Rivals

“I think you’re gonna see a lot of really bad things,” the president said
By Ryan Bort


President Trump has been trying to discredit the Justice Department’s investigation into his campaign’s relationship with Russia for most of his presidency. His attempts to do so have mostly come through his Twitter account and yelling over Marine One on the White House lawn. But when Attorney General William Barr took over the Justice Department in February, it quickly became clear federal law enforcement resources would be used to go after the people who conducted the probe.

It didn’t take long. When Special Counsel Robert Mueller released his findings in April, Trump and Barr teamed up to misrepresent them. The following month, Barr tapped a John H. Durham, a U.S. attorney in Connecticut, to look into the origins of the investigation. Now, the New York Times reported on Thursday, Durham’s inquiry is no longer just an inquiry; it’s officially a full-scale criminal investigation.

In other words, the Justice Department is now investigating itself in service of the president’s political agenda.

When asked about the investigation Friday morning, Trump called Barr a “highly prestigious man” while defending the move to pursue criminal charges. “I think you’re gonna see a lot of really bad things,” he said.

Though, as the Times notes, DOJ guidelines hold that there must be an “objective, factual basis for initiating [an] investigation,” it’s not clear what — if any — evidence Durham was able to uncover that led the DOJ to launch an investigation into the origins of the Russia probe. But the distinction will give Durham the ability to issue subpoenas and put together a grand jury to file criminal charges.

What those charges might be are a mystery. Trump and his allies have propagated several baseless conspiracy theories that the Russia probe was launched illegally by Democrats working in tandem with corrupt officials within the Justice Department. Most recently, Trump has hammered the idea that Russia did not actually interfere in the election (despite that this has long been the conclusion of both Congress and the intelligence community), and that Putin was framed by Democrats upset Trump won the election. If this doesn’t sound like it makes much sense, it’s because it doesn’t, and it’s frightening to consider what kind of criminal charges Durham might try to wring out of the morass of reckless speculation surrounding the investigation’s origins that the president has tried to cram into reality.

None of this is surprising. Trump has made it clear since taking office that he sees the Justice Department as a tool to carry out his personal agenda. He repeatedly attacked Jeff Sessions, his first attorney general, for not doing more to stymie the Russia investigation, ultimately forcing his resignation. His subsequent nomination of Barr, a noted critic of the investigation who had demonstrated extreme views on executive privilege, was considered a play to take a more offensive stance toward the inquiry. Launching a criminal investigation into the origins of the investigation certainly qualifies.

In This Article: Donald Trump, Justice Department, Russia Investigation, William Barr

10-24-19  12:23pm - 1792 days #2
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
bigboi97 recently reviewed SexMex.xxx, which is a latina site.
Gave it a 79, because of broken links and quality issues in the videos.

10-24-19  06:55am - 1792 days #1470
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Trump's lawyer: He can't be charged while in office.
Trump's legal team suggested that subjecting a president to a criminal investigation would be a distraction from his official duties.

Therefore, Trump is innocent. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. And Trump is the most innocent man of everyone in the United States of America, because he is making America great again.

So stop the impeachment proceedings, because they are taking away from the glory of President Trump.

10-24-19  06:36am - 1792 days #1469
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Thank God for President Trump.
He will keep us safe.
He is now building a wall in Colorado.
That will keep out low-life scum and other people of color from flooking into the state and keep the bloodlines pure.
--------------
--------------
Trump says he's building a wall in Colorado - which is not a border state

HuffPost US
Ryan Grenoble
Oct 24th 2019 4:34AM

COLORADO ― Either President Trump failed remedial geography, or we’ve reached a full-on “Emperor’s New Clothes” scenario.

This, after Trump received a standing ovation in Pittsburgh on Wednesday after boasting about a nonexistent border wall he’s building ― in Colorado.

“We’re building a wall in Colorado - we’re building a beautiful wall,” Trump told the cheering crowd at a shale energy conference. “A big one that really works, that you can’t get over, you can’t get under.”

If Trump is building a wall on Colorado’s southern border with New Mexico, that’s news to the governors of both states, who were unaware of any such structure.

“Well this is awkward ... Colorado doesn’t border Mexico,” tweeted that state’s governor, Democrat Jared Polis, soon after Trump’s claim. “Good thing Colorado now offers free full day kindergarten so our kids can learn basic geography.”

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s press secretary Nora Sackett was less amused.

“Wouldn’t surprise me if he really did forget about a state that he lost by such a significant margin, especially when that seems to be the only thing of importance to him and given that he can expect more of the same in 2020,” Sackett told HuffPost in an email. “No one wants his wall, whether it’s on the Mexican border, the Colorado border, or the Canadian border.”

In a follow-up statement, a different member of Grisham’s press office emphasized: “Yes, we are a state.”

No wall here.

Sackett added that, in policy, the Trump administration really does seem to have turned a blind eye to New Mexicans devastated by the opioid crisis and others whose livelihoods depend on border trade.

So, will Trump admit he flunked this particular geography lesson?

If his history with maps ― and the eagerness with which he alters them ― is any indication, probably not. To that end, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) has provided a preview of what we should expect from the Oval Office in the near future:

This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

10-23-19  05:34pm - 1793 days #13
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
While I think it's a great idea for models to own their own content, if that's the way sites like Clips4Sale work, the prices for a single clip are way too expensive.
Like rearadmiral says, you can join a porn site for the cost of a single clip.
So who is going to pay for those individual clips?
Especially, since the trend for younger porn users is to get their content for free.
What--me pay for porn? Ridiculous.

10-22-19  10:02pm - 1794 days Original Post - #1
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA


The officer should have drawn his gun and shot the 11-year-old girl in self-defense.
She was clearly a threat to not only the police officer, but to her fellow students and the school staff.
A clean, kill-shot to the head or heart would have made the school a safer place.

This was an intelligent cop. He was clearly heard saying "Stop resisting" multiple times.
That alone justified him throwing the girl against the wall, and then forcing her to the ground.
The cop also said the girl assaulted the school staff.
But the school staff, the ninnies, denied they were assaulted.
Don't they realize they are supposed to support their local police?
No matter what?

-------
-------


Video allegedly shows police officer roughing up 11-year-old girl

NBC News
Theo Wayt
Oct 22nd 2019 8:01PM

A New Mexico school resource officer has resigned after allegedly using excessive force against an 11-year-old girl who he alleges "took more milks than she was supposed to" from the cafeteria.

Lapel video of the Aug. 27 incident involving Farmington police officer Zach Christensen, an 11-year veteran of the department released Monday, appears to show him shoving the crying sixth grader into a wall.

The child then falls to the ground and Christensen can be heard yelling, "Stop resisting" multiple times.

The officer continues to struggle with the girl, not allowing her to stand up while asking her to put her hands behind her back.

At one point, as Christiansen stands over the girl, gripping her arm, a school administrator intervenes, saying, “Officer Christiansen, she is not a threat to yourself or others.”

Christiansen replies, “No. She is.”

Eventually, the administrator tries to talk him down, saying, “Sir, we are not going to use excessive force to get this done.”

Christiansen then yells, “We’re not excessive!”

Farmington Police Department Chief Steve Hebbe condemned Christiansen’s actions and confirmed his removal from the department on Monday in a video posted to Facebook, saying, “There’s no excuse for the way this girl was treated.”

Hebbe said that Christensen alleged that the child assaulted school staff, but added, "this proved not to be true." The officer was placed on administrative leave following the incident and an internal affairs review revealed that he had made policy violations, Hebbe said.

Hebbe also told NBC News that his department referred the case to the New Mexico state police, but that the local district attorney declined to pursue charges. However, the Attorney General of New Mexico may open an investigation, Hebbe said.

On Sept. 24, Officer Christiansen informed the department of his plans to resign effective Oct. 1. Christiansen’s supervisor, who has not been named, took a voluntary demotion and was been reassigned to street patrol after failing to "identify the incident as unacceptable", Hebbe said in his video statement.

The confrontation apparently started with an incident in the school cafeteria involving milk. “This morning, she went straight to the cafeteria,” Christiansen can be heard saying in the video. “She took more milks than she was supposed to. She threw a milk on the ground.”


Asked how he plans to prevent incidents like this in the future, Police Chief Hebbe said, “That’s tough. We already feel like we have a pretty robust system in place.” But he says the department plans to review its use-of-force training.

Mark Carnutt, the girl’s attorney, told NBC News he has filed a notice of tort claim, which in New Mexico is often a precursor to filing a lawsuit.

“If a parent was doing that same thing, wouldn’t they be charged?” Carnutt said. “Is there a different standard for which police are considered for committing crimes versus other people?”

10-22-19  11:52am - 1794 days #1468
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Rep. Ilhan Omar was a female Somali army recruit at a Mogadishu military training campus in 1978, four years before she was born in 1984.
She was born in sin, steeped in terrorism even before she was born.
A Muslim in Congress?
What is the United States of America thinking, letting a person who is not only a woman, but also a Muslim, into the hallowed halls of Congress?

----------
----------


Rep. Ilhan Omar condemns GOP state lawmaker's Facebook post

The Associated Press
STEVE KARNOWSKI and JAMES MACPHERSON
Oct 22nd 2019 12:29PM

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Rep. Ilhan Omar has condemned a Republican state senator from North Dakota who posted a long-debunked photo on his Facebook page that purports to show the Minnesota Democrat holding a weapon at an al-Qaida training camp.

Omar, a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Somalia and is one of the first Muslim women elected to Congress, blasted state Sen. Oley Larsen's post, which also led to a call Tuesday from a top fellow Republican to apologize and relinquish a state Senate leadership position.

"This is pure propaganda designed to stir up hate and violence," Omar tweeted Monday night. "... Facebook's unwillingness to crack down on hate speech and misinformation is not just threatening my life, but our democracy."

The image Larsen posted has been debunked by several sources since it appeared on social media this summer. It's an Associated Press photo taken of a female Somali army recruit at a Mogadishu military training campus in 1978, four years before Omar was born in 1984.

In the comments accompanying his post, Larsen also called Omar an "elected terrorist" and asked his followers to "share it everywhere."

Facing mounting criticism, though, Larsen removed the photo Monday. And by Tuesday morning, his Facebook feed — minus the image — was full of attacks on him for posting it and accusing him of bigotry.


On Tuesday, the North Dakota Senate's majority leader, Republican Rich Wardner, called on Larsen to apologize and give up his position as the state Senate's president pro tempore, a post in which he presides over sessions when the lieutenant governor is absent.

"At this point I'm not calling for his resignation from the Senate, but if continues with this, I will have to rethink that," Wardner said.

Neither Larsen, who is from Minot, nor Facebook responded to requests for comment.

Facebook has been under fire from politicians, regulators and privacy advocates around the world over problems ranging from election security to what many consider its disproportionate, often negative influence on society.


While Facebook has said it's stepping up efforts to remove content that violates its rules, it has also said it's not the company's role to fact check or judge the veracity of what politicians say.

10-22-19  11:16am - 1794 days #152
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Freddie, thanks for the winning raffle ticket.

There seems to be an error in willie4557 review.

His review is posted under (or for) Old N Young.

He writes about the gay part of the site.
There is no gay content at that site.

It seems he has gotten the name of the site he is reviewing wrong.

The Old N Young site does not have any gay content.
It's exclusively older men having sex with younger women (mainly teen girls).

As mbaya pointed out in two replies to the review.

I assume willie4557 wrote the review under the Old N Young site, because a lot of porn sites have similar names, and he confused the Old N Young site with the site he wanted to review.

No big thing. Edited on Oct 22, 2019, 11:22am

10-16-19  07:40am - 1800 days #1467
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Monica Lewinsky, an expert who has had an intimate connection with the impeachment process, speaks about the impeachment inquiry of Donald Trump.
Monica says she is personally affected by the inquiry.
Is Monica a secret admirer of Donald Trump?
Or maybe she's one of Trump's many hidden girlfriends?

But Monica is a brave girl, and a fighter. If she and Donald Trump have a secret relationship, then Monica can come out of the closet and discuss it openly.

Enquiring minds want to know the true details.
---------
---------



Monica Lewinsky talks impeachment inquiry: 'We're all affected'

Today Show
Scott Stump
Oct 16th 2019 9:48AM

The impeachment inquiry launched against President Donald Trump last month has brought the past rushing back for Monica Lewinsky.

"Impeachment is a constitutional crisis, so obviously it's much bigger than me, but am I affected personally? Sure, of course,'' Lewinsky told Savannah Guthrie on TODAY Wednesday.

"People are making comparisons to when Bill Clinton was impeached. I've become a punchline of a joke a little bit more than normal."

The activist and speaker was at the center of the investigation surrounding the 1998 impeachment of President Clinton after she had an affair with him while working as a White House intern.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi initiated the inquiry against Trump on Sept. 24 for allegedly pressuring leaders of Ukraine for help in undermining political rival Joe Biden.

The action by Pelosi conjured memories of the '90s impeachment hearings against Clinton in which his sexual encounters with Lewinsky were examined in tawdry detail.

However, Lewinsky sees the current crisis as much bigger than any effect it has had on her.


"I found myself the last few weeks — I'm certainly more sensitive,'' she said. "Some people in my world might say cranky. Needed more self-care. The truth is if we're talking seriously about impeachment, it actually means we're all affected in the country."


Lewinsky has since become an activist fighting against public shaming and online bullying by drawing on her own experiences with it.

"I eventually kind of came to this point where I realized that I couldn't run away from what happened to me,'' she said. "I had to integrate it.

"What it also means is that anybody can do this. This can happen for anybody, you don't have to have go through a global scandal. I think that no matter what your humiliations are or setbacks, you can find a way to have a different ending to your story. "
breaking-news logo

Lewinsky appeared on TODAY Wednesday to unveil a powerful new interactive public service announcement about what she called the "silent epidemic" of online bullying.

She also spoke about her return to public life in recent years to fight against bullying and public shaming.

"It was terrifying. I think that it really could've gone differently, and I'm so incredibly grateful for how things have changed,'' she said. "I can't even begin to tell you what it feels like to be able to give a purpose to my past and to use these painful experiences to help other people."

10-11-19  10:33am - 1805 days #1466
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
President Trump's financial records will be turned over to Congress.
However, Trump can stand on his own two feet, and refuse the court order.
Trump is a man with a strong will.
He does not hesitate to break agreements, and says he is the master of his own free will.

Also, the American public will not be able to read Trump's financial records, because Congress will respect Trump's right to privacy.

America first, or America Uber Alles.




-------------
-------------
Appeals court rules House should get Trump financial records

The Associated Press
MARK SHERMAN and JESSICA GRESKO
Oct 11th 2019 12:01PM

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump's financial records must be turned over to the House of Representatives.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said that lawmakers should get the documents they have subpoenaed from Mazars USA. The firm has provided accounting services to Trump.

Trump went to court to prevent Mazars from turning over the records. He could appeal to the Supreme Court.

The House Committee on Oversight and Reform subpoenaed records from Mazars in April. They include documents from 2011 to 2018 that the House wants for investigation into the president's reporting of his finances and potential conflicts of interest.

In a 2-1 ruling, the appeals court batted away Trump's legal claims.


"Contrary to the President's arguments, the Committee possesses authority under both the House Rules and the Constitution to issue the subpoena, and Mazars must comply," Judge David Tatel wrote, joined by Judge Patricia Millett. Tatel was appointed by President Bill Clinton. Millett is an appointee of President Barack Obama.

Trump appointee Neomi Rao wrote in dissent that the committee should have asked for the records under the House's impeachment power, not its legislative authority.

"The Constitution and our historical practice draw a consistent line between the legislative and judicial powers of Congress. The majority crosses this boundary for the first time by upholding this subpoena investigating the illegal conduct of the President under the legislative power," Rao wrote.

The case is one of several working its way through courts in which Trump is fighting with Congress over records. The House Ways and Means Committee has sued the Trump administration over access to the president's tax returns . In New York, Trump sued to prevent Deutsche Bank and Capital One from complying with House subpoenas for banking and financial records. A judge ruled against him, and Trump appealed. Trump also is in court trying to stop the Manhattan District Attorney from obtaining his tax returns.

Trump had argued that Oversight committee seeking the records from Mazars is out to get him and lacks a legitimate "legislative purpose" for its request. His lawyers have argued that congressional investigations are valid only if there is legislation that might result from them.

The committee, for its part, has said it is seeking the Trump financial statements, accounting records and other documents as part of its investigation into whether the president has undisclosed conflicts of interests, whether he has accurately reported his finances and whether he may have engaged in illegal conduct before and during his time in office.

The committee says the House is considering legislation related to government conflicts of interest and presidential financial disclosures, among other things.

10-08-19  11:44pm - 1808 days #141
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


LKLK - keep that up and I'll take you off my Christmas card list!


rearadmiral, you couldn't be so cruel.
Your Christmas cards are one of the highlights I look forward to each year.


10-08-19  11:00am - 1808 days #139
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Originally Posted by FreddieAdmin:



In first place, we have our favourite Canadian, rearadmiral! Thank you for your wonderful review for 18 Eighteen!


Freddie, enough with the false modesty.
You're my favorite Canadian.
rearadmiral is a distant second.

LOL.

10-08-19  09:52am - 1808 days #23
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Thank God PU has members who read the rules and try to point out possible errors other PU members may have committed.

Here is an example of PU member tangub pointing out that PU member mbaya may have broken some rules regarding a review.

The replies are to mbaya's review of Wet And Puffy, submitted 10-08-19.

Freddie approved the review, but tangub writes that the review should not have been awarded any points, because the review was basically a cut and paste job of a previous review that mbaya had submitted.

The current mbaya review of Wet and Puffy was submitted on 10-08-19.
The previous mbabya review of Wet and Puffy was submitted on 09-14-17.
If you want to compare the two reviews, both reviews are basically the same review.

-----------
-----------



1
tangub (206) Reading this review I just had the feeling that I've read it before so I looked back and it appears this entire review is an exact copy and paste of your September 2017 review of the same site with just the number of scenes and number of updates changed in the pros and cons. Only problem is you haven't changed the bottom line to match where you repeat the number of scenes and update rate at the site so your bottom line contradicts your pros and cons....Careless dude!

I've often wondered how some of you guys manage to get through so many porn subscriptions and reviews because it takes me bloody hours to write a review, often an entire evening or longer....now I know...copy, paste, submit. Do you even have a subscription here because the number of scenes can easily be updated just by visiting the site tour?
10-08-19 09:02am

Reply To Message
2
mbaya (582) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

This review is ineligible as this is not my week to win anything.
It was approved by Freddie.
Ask her why?
10-08-19 09:05am

Reply To Message
3
tangub (206) REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :

I didn't mention anything about the raffle. My point was about the entire review being a copy and paste of a previous review.

Rule 4 for being awarded feedback points towards user rankings states:

4. Review should be unique compared to previously written reviews. No copy/paste material.

So you should not be awarded any feedback points for this review if the rules are followed but I doubt that will be the case.
10-08-19 09:23am

10-07-19  03:21am - 1809 days #1465
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Donald Trump, the President of the United States, wants Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House of Representatives) and Adam Schiff (another member of Congress) to be tried for treason.
The two members of Congress are attacking Trump, our dear President.
They should be tried for treason, and executed.
End of story.
-----
-----
Trump suggests Nancy Pelosi is guilty of treason amid impeachment inquiry

Business Insider
Rosie Perper (feedback@businessinsider.com)
Oct 7th 2019 5:28AM

President Donald Trump on Sunday night launched an attack against Democrats who are pursuing an impeachment inquiry against him.
In a pair of tweets on Sunday, Trump suggested that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, were both guilty of treason.
Pelosi announced last month that the House would launch a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump's activities — in particular, a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which is at the center of a whistleblower complaint filed in August.
Trump has denied that he said anything inappropriate during his phone call with Zelensky, and he suggested in a closed-door meeting last month that the whistleblower is "almost a spy."

President Donald Trump on Sunday heightened his attacks on Democrats who are pursuing an impeachment inquiry against him, claiming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Adam Schiff were both guilty of treason.

Pelosi announced last month that the House would launch a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump's activities — in particular, a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that is at the center of an August whistleblower complaint.

The intelligence official who lodged the complaint detailed concerns that Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son on allegations of corruption.

The complaint was declassified last month, and the White House released a memo about the call that appeared to corroborate it.

Trump on Sunday night lashed out at Pelosi and Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who has been tasked with leading the impeachment investigation.


"Nancy Pelosi knew of all of the many Shifty Adam Schiff lies and massive frauds perpetrated upon Congress and the American people," he wrote.

"This makes Nervous Nancy every bit as guilty as Liddle' Adam Schiff for High Crimes and Misdemeanors, and even Treason. I guess that means that they, along with all of those that evilly "Colluded" with them, must all be immediately Impeached!"


Schiff previously characterized Trump's call with Zelenksy to a "classic mafia shakedown of a foreign leader." He later defended his comments and said they were "meant to be at least, part, in parody."
breaking-news logo


Trump has denied that he said anything inappropriate during his phone call with Zelensky, and he suggested in a closed-door meeting last month that the whistleblower is "almost a spy."

Trump also accused Schiff of committing treason in a tweetstorm last week and demanded to meet with his accuser.

Schiff said last month that the whistleblower has agreed to testify before Congress, and said the testimony is expected "very soon" once security measures are in place to protect his or her identity.

10-07-19  03:14am - 1809 days #1464
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
If President Trump ever asked anyone to do an illegal act, it was only a joke on the President's part.
Trump would never do anything illegal.
The people he hires would never do anything illegal.
Trump is the most moral President the US has ever had.
-------
-------

Rep. Jordan suggests Trump was only joking when asking China to investigate the Bidens — despite private plea to Xi

Yahoo News
Kadia Tubman
Oct 6th 2019 5:20PM

Rep. Jim Jordan on Sunday insisted President Trump was not “serious” about asking China to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

“Do you think it’s appropriate for President Trump to ask China and Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden?” asked George Stephanopoulos in an interview on ABC’s “This Week.”

“George, you really think he was serious about thinking that China’s going to investigate the Biden family?” Jordan, R-Ohio, responded, smiling.

“He said it right there in public,” Stephanopoulos pointed out.

“As I think Senator [Marco] Rubio said a couple of days ago, I think he’s getting the press all spun up about this.”

Rubio, R-Fla., at a press conference Friday said he doubted Trump was making “a real request” when he called on China in addition to Ukraine to investigate the Bidens. As he’d done with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky, Trump had also discussed his political rivals with China’s President Xi Jinping. During a June 18 phone call, the president brought up the standing of Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in the presidential race, CNN reported Thursday. While the record of that call was stored in the same highly secure electronic system that houses the full record of Trump’s call with Zelensky, Trump is also reported to have told Xi that he would remain silent on protests in Hong Kong while trade negotiations continued with the U.S.

To call on a foreign government to investigate a political opponent is illegal, and is the primary reason why House Democrats are conducting an impeachment inquiry.

“Remember, this is the president who’s been tougher on China than any other president,” said Jordan, who sits on the House Oversight Committee. “The same guy who’s been tougher on China now thinks, ‘Oh, China’s going to investigate’ — he was just making a statement to just underscore how wrong it is what took place here with Hunter Biden getting these deals that he got. That’s all he’s doing.”

“So the president asked China to investigate. We’re not supposed to take the president at his word?” Stephanopoulos pressed.

“Again, I think Senator Rubio said it best,” Jordan said.

“But he said in public the exact same thing he said in private to the Ukrainian president,” Stephanopoulos countered.

Jordan argued that outrage, which also came from a member of his party, sparked by Trump’s comment should instead be directed at a claim that the “Democrat National Committee hired a foreigner [Ukraine] who worked with Russians to dig up dirt on the president.”

“So should I conclude from that that you don’t think it would be appropriate for the president to ask China to investigate the Bidens?” asked Stephanopoulos.

“I don’t think anyone in America really believes — except people maybe in the press and some Democrats in Congress really believe that the president of the United States thinks China is going to investigate,” Jordan said.

Republican Party leader Sen. Roy Blunt also cast doubt on Trump’s words, saying on Sunday, “I doubt the China comment is serious.”

“The president loves to go out on the White House driveway,” said Blunt, R-Miss., who sits on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Committee. “I haven't talked to him about this. I don’t know what the president was thinking. But I do know he loves to bait the press and he does that almost every day to see what you’ll talk about.”

Earlier this year, Trump claimed his call for Russia to find stolen emails from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee was a “joke.”

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said at a July 2016 news conference, and days after the FBI quietly opened an investigation, Operation Crossfire Hurricane, into connections between his campaign and Russia.

In March, he passed the request off as a joke: “I’ve learned with the fake news, if you tell a joke, if you are sarcastic, if you're having fun with the audience, if you are on live television with millions of people and 25,000 people in an arena, and if you say something like ‘Russia, please, if you can, get us Hillary Clinton's emails! Please, Russia, please! Please get us the emails! Please!’”

10-03-19  02:20pm - 1813 days #1463
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Pence says Biden, son should be investigated for Ukraine dealings


Thomson Reuters
Oct 3rd 2019 3:46PM

Oct 3 (Reuters) - U.S. Vice President Mike Pence on Thursday offered a full-throated defense of President Donald Trump's call for an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son's dealings with Ukraine, saying the American people deserve to know the facts.

"The American people have the right to know whether or not the vice president of the United States or his family profited from his position," Pence told reporters in Scottsdale, Arizona.

In a phone call in July, President Donald Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Biden, the leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, and his son Hunter.

That request is at the center of an impeachment inquiry launched by House Democrats, who accuse the president of abusing his office in an effort to gather dirt on a political rival.

Trump has repeatedly suggested Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a top prosecutor because the prosecutor was investigating a Ukrainian gas company where Hunter Biden sat on the board, a claim for which the president has offered no evidence.

Pence, who had remained largely silent as the political controversy erupted, firmly sided with Trump in his remarks.

"My predecessor had a son who was paid $50,000 a month to be on a Ukrainian board at the time that Vice President Biden was leading the Obama administration's efforts in Ukraine, I think (that) is worth looking into," Pence said. "And the president has made it very clear that he believes ... other nations around the world should look into it as well."

"When you hold the second highest office in the land it comes with unique responsibilities - not just to be above impropriety, but to be above the appearance of impropriety, and clearly in this case there are legitimate questions that ought to be asked," Pence added in a direct attack on Biden.

Pence also took aim at Democrats generally for what he termed as "endless investigations" of Trump, which he said should end. (Reporting by Makini Brice and Tim Ahmann; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Steve Orlofsky)

10-03-19  02:15pm - 1813 days #2
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
I don't know why, but the last couple of posts I tried to enter on these threads, just went to internet trash.
They just disappeared.

Is it my PC, or the PU site, that's having problems?

Anyway, I agree that Halloween porn is usually a disappointment.
It's too dark, and makes the models hard to see, or very unattractive.

10-03-19  11:00am - 1813 days #12
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
I suggested earlier (a few weeks back?) that the first place prize in a raffle could be awarded to the most interesting or valuable or well-written review of the month.
The PU members could vote on this, as well as the PU staff, or whatever.

That award could be given at the end of the month, or the beginning of the next month raffle.

Separately, Freddie wrote: "We're currently in the process of reviewing the rules for the raffle because the adult industry is changing and we want to reflect that."

Could you expand or explain how you want the raffle to reflect the changes in the adult industry?
What changes are you talking about?
The PU staff, working in the industry, must have a much clearer idea of what the industry is doing.

But are you talking about the rise of tube sites, the gathering of sites into networks (such as Adult Time or MetArt network), the financial problems of the adult industry (which seems to have started around 2008 with the financial crisis and still continues to this day, with a lot of sites either closing or being acquired), or what?

How do you want the raffle or the raffle rules to reflect what is happening to the adult industry?
I have no idea what changes you want to make, to reflect changing conditions.

Separately, the rules for the raffle, especially the rules that determine how a review is awarded feedback points:
https://www.pornusers.com/profile_points.html

should be listed on the PU review form.

That page should, as I said, be part of the add-a-review form, to show new members what a review should contain, and to remind older members the same thing: I doubt most members have read that page in a very long time, if ever.

So, that should be the bible of a review. And it should be re-written clearly, to explain what the PU staff wants the review to contain.

10-01-19  04:21pm - 1815 days #4
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
How do you tell if a site or channel belongs to a third party domain?
Is Teen Mega World a third party domain?
Is LetsDoeIt a third party domain?

Some of the networks seem to be calling their sites channels instead of sites.
Since I don't work for a porn web site, I don't really understand if there is a technical distinction between a site and channel.

As a porn consumer, I didn't think the difference between a site and channel was important.
But if the PU site wants to make a distinction, what is it based on?
So as a PU member, I can tell what is what.

LetsDoeIt calls its sites channels.
Is LetsDoeIt a third party domain?

Are the LetsDoeIt channels stripped down versions of the sites?

The PU site needs to explain, or make clear, what the rules are:
What you are talking about, and how to follow the rules.

10-01-19  03:47pm - 1815 days #132
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
mbaya,

In a reply to my review of the Bare Maidens channel of Adult Time, you posted:
6 mbaya (580) REPLY TO #4 - tangub :

I just asked Freddie if this is proper.
09-24-19 05:00pm

Your reply was a reply to tangub, who wrote that my review was not a review of the Bare Maidens site itself, but a review of the Bare Maidens channel of Adult Time.
Tangub wrote that the review was misleading and should be deleted.

My review didn't apparently break any rules, but you seemed to want it disqualified for the raffle.

I wonder if your reviews should qualify for the raffle, seem you seem to have a poisonous mind.

That's all.

10-01-19  02:48pm - 1815 days #129
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
‌In the interests of fairness and honesty, I must report that mbaya was not eligible for today's raffle.

On 08-27-19 11:59am, mbaya posted the following:
Porn Users Forum » WTF
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...=5892&showPost=1


08-27-19 11:59am
mbaya

You see things your way and I see mine.
I will do nothing further.
No reviews
No replies
No comments
No forum posts

I wash my hands of all of this. Eleven years.

=====
=====
Therefore, either someone is reviewing under mbaya's alias, or he is a liar.
Since he said he will no longer write reviews.

I am doing this for the honesty of the PU site, since mbaya seems to be such a follower of the rules of what is right and wrong.

09-30-19  03:36pm - 1816 days #1461
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Warning!!!!!
If Trump is removed from office, America could face a civil war.
Thousands of Americans could be killed.
Vote for Trump, the choice of right-wing Christians.

--------
--------
GOP Rep: Trump's 'Civil War' retweet 'beyond repugnant'

HuffPost US
Mary Papenfuss
Sep 30th 2019 9:15AM

President Donald Trump on Sunday ominously raised the possibility of violence if he is removed from office, quoting an evangelical pastor who warned on Fox News of a “Civil War-like” fracture.

Illinois Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger, an Air Force veteran of Iraq, quickly slammed Trump’s tweet as “beyond repugnant,” adding: “I have never imagined such a quote to be repeated by a President.”

The Rev. Robert Jeffress said in an interview Sunday (see the video above) that “removing the president” will “cause a Civil War-like fracture in this nation from which this country will never heal.”

“I have never seen them more angry,” Jeffress, a right-wing megachurch pastor based in Dallas and powerful Trump supporter, said of evangelicals.

As many as 850,000 men were killed in the Civil War, according to a 2012 study by historians ― by far the greatest toll of any war in American history. An earlier estimate of 620,000 Civil War deaths approximately equaled the total American fatalities in the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Spanish American War, World War I, World War II, and the Korean War, combined, the National Park Service says.

Jeffress, who also preaches on radio and TV, has said that Jews are going to hell. He has characterized both Islam and Mormonism as heresies from the “pit of hell,” and called evangelical Christians who don’t support Trump “morons.”

Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) also slammed Trump’s tweet.

“This is just a reprehensible way to talk and people could get hurt,” Schatz warned. He added that this “isn’t about partisan teams anymore.”

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) cited Trump’s warning in a tweet and wondered if Republicans will now support the impeachment inquiry against the president — and condemn him in “strong, unequivocal terms.”

In addition to the outrage expressed by politicians against Trump’s tweet, other followers of the president were stunned:

09-17-19  12:42pm - 1829 days Original Post - #1
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA


"Rambo must confront his past and unearth his ruthless combat skills to exact revenge in a final mission."

Sylvester Stallone was born July 6, 1946 in New York City, New York, USA.
People from New York City are among the toughest on Earth.
Which is why Rambo is still going strong.
He has his knife, his bow and arrow, and assorted guns, and he will be on a mission to save everyone from the Evil that infects people everywhere.

Sly is now 73 years old, but in spite of getting older, he is still the fearsome warrior we have grown to love and admire.

Even if he has to use a rocket-propelled wheelchair, he will be fighting Evil until the very end.

So pony us for a ticket to see his latest movie, coming to a theater near you.

Sly, my hero (after Arnie).

09-15-19  07:41am - 1831 days #1460
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Will President Trump lose his best drinking buddy?
Who will Trump find if Kavanaugh goes to jail?
Gasp! Can a US Supreme Court justice go to jail for sex crimes?
For lying to Congress under oath?
Enquiring minds want to know...
-----------
-----------
Julian Castro calls for Kavanaugh impeachment after new claim of sex misconduct

Sep 15th 2019 9:25AM

Democratic presidential contender Julián Castro and some former U.S. attorneys called for a new investigation into Brett Kavanaugh and the past FBI probe into his behavior as another accusation of sexual misconduct against the Supreme Court associate justice surfaced.

Classmate Max Stier told two New York Times reporters that he saw Kavanaugh with his pants down at a drunken Yale University party where friends pushed Kavanaugh’s penis into the hands of a female student. The report was similar to an allegation lodged against Kavanaugh last year by former classmate Deborah Ramirez. Stier informed senators and the FBI of the incident during Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, but it was never investigated, according to the Times.

At the time, Christine Blasey Ford publicly accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed and trying to take off her clothes at a high school party, and she testified before senators at the hearings.

Following the Times’ story, Castro called for Kavanaugh’s impeachment, tweeting: “It’s more clear than ever that Brett Kavanaugh lied under oath.” He called Kavanaugh’s ascendence a “shame to the Supreme Court.”

Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) echoed Castro’s accusation that Kavanaugh lied under oath to the United States Senate, adding that the majority of senators “didn’t care.”

Former U.S. attorney Joyce Vance called for a “full congressional investigation” into Kavanaugh’s behavior and a probe into his past to “determine whether someone, and if so who, gave orders that kept the FBI from investigating credible allegations.”

Another former U.S. attorney, Harry Litman, called the FBI investigation into Kavanaugh a “total con job.”

09-10-19  06:25pm - 1836 days #2
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
I've noticed in the past that sites will occasionally delete content for some models.
It appears to happen on a random basis.
Whether the deletion is done at the request of the model is usually not given. No reason is given. Maybe if you're friendly with the webmaster you might send an email and enquire for the reason.

Very rarely the deletion might be for an underage model.
But there could be other reasons.
I believe all the Grigori Galitsin content was deleted from MetArt around the time he was arrested in Russia. Galitsin was an early and important contributor to MetArt in its early days.

But models sometimes have their content deleted from sites, and usually no reason is given.
This has happened at MetArt, Hegre, etc.
It happens.

09-10-19  10:19am - 1836 days #117
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Freddie, I think the best review of the month winning being given the $100 raffle prize when the month is ending) is a worthwhile idea.

Maybe it will encourage some better reviews. Or not.

Some reviews can be really interesting, with fresh ideas, or well-written.

The PU members and staff can vote on the best reviews, from the past month.

Just an idea, that has some merit, I think.

So the same review could win an earlier raffle prize (or be an entry in an earlier raffle draw), and still be considered for the best review of the month.

Because every once in a while, an excellent review does come out.

09-06-19  02:41pm - 1840 days #116
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Freddie, thanks again for the Amazon card, and the kind words that came with it.

09-06-19  02:36pm - 1840 days #5
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Loki, I could tell from your avatar that you were drawn to the dark side.
But with prayers from the PU community, I feel that you will be saved.
And maybe the prayers from the young gals in college also helped.

We need all the help we can get, from the evil forces that are creeping into this world of ours.
Donald Trump is the Anti Christ, and we must unite to resist him and his demonic horde.

Praise be to Allah and any other leaders of the true and righteous faiths.

And burn all unbelievers, to send them to hell!

The only good Indian is a dead Indian.

09-04-19  12:27pm - 1842 days Original Post - #1
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA


Harry Potter books banned from Catholic school for fear of student spells

Kids may be tempted to conjure "evil spirits," the Nashville school's pastor says.

By
Bonnie Burton

September 3, 2019 2:34 PM PDT


Harry Potter made spell-casting look easy, but that doesn't mean the books' spells are real.
Warner Bros.

Harry Potter is dangerous? The beloved book series by author J.K. Rowling about a young wizard and his friends has been taken off library shelves at St. Edward Catholic School in Nashville because the school's pastor believes the books' magical spells are real.

Rev. Dan Reehil, the pastor of the school serving kindergarten through eighth grade, removed the books from circulation because of "recommendations of exorcists in United States and Rome," according to CNN on Tuesday.

"These books present magic as both good and evil, which is not true," Reehil said in an e-mail originally published by the Tennessean on Saturday. "The curses and spells used in the books are actual curses and spells, which when read by a human being risk conjuring evil spirits into the presence of the person reading the texts."

Rebecca Hammel, superintendent of schools for the Catholic Diocese of Nashville, confirmed that Reehil's email about removing the books is real, and says that while the Catholic Church doesn't have an official position on the Harry Potter books, the school's pastor has the final say, according to the Tennessean and CNN.

St. Edward Catholic School, Hammel, Reehil and Rowling didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

The school's move might surprise fans, but it's worth noting that the Harry Potter book series tops the list of most challenged books in the United States in the 21st century, according to The American Library Association. Challenges are defined as formal, written complaints filed with a library or school requesting that materials be removed because of content or appropriateness.

09-03-19  05:58pm - 1843 days #1459
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Trump, the man who promised he would never play golf if elected president, because the job is too important to take time off to fool around on a golf course, changed his mind once elected.
He now plays more golf than any previous president, by far.
And while Hurrican Dorian is getting closer to Florida, Trump goes to the golf course.
And of course Trump says that his time on the golf course is very cheap.
Except that it has cost US taxpayers over $100 million dollars for Trump to go golfing.
------
------

Trump defends weekend of golf while Hurricane Dorian approached

Yahoo News
Christopher Wilson
Sep 3rd 2019 12:20PM

President Trump lashed out at Sadiq Khan Tuesday after London’s mayor criticized him for golfing over the weekend as Hurricane Dorian edged closer to the coast of Florida.

“The incompetent Mayor of London, Sadique Kahn [sic], was bothered that I played a very fast round of golf yesterday,” said Trump in a tweet that, before being corrected, misspelled Khan’s first and last names. “Many Pols exercise for hours, or travel for weeks. Me, I run through one of my courses (very inexpensive). President Obama would fly to Hawaii.”

Khan, who attended a ceremony in Poland over the weekend commemorating the 80th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of Poland that began World War II, chided the president for skipping the event in favor of golfing at his private club in Virginia.

“He’s clearly busy dealing with a hurricane out on the golf course,” Khan told Politico on Monday, adding that Trump “is a guy who amplifies racist tweets; amplifies the tweets of fascists; says things that are deeply objectionable. If I don’t stand up and call that out I think I’m doing a disservice to Londoners who chose me as their mayor.”

Trump has often criticized Khan, the first Muslim elected mayor of London, and routinely resorts to ad hominem attacks on those who find fault with him.

“Khan should focus on ‘knife crime,’ which is totally out of control in London. People are afraid to even walk the streets,” Trump wrote Tuesday. “He is a terrible mayor who should stay out of our business!”

Over the holiday weekend, the president played multiple rounds of golf at one of his properties in Virginia, where White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said he received “hourly updates.”

Trump’s golf trips have cost taxpayers over $100 million through the first two and a half years of his term, as he’s spent 227 days at one of his golf clubs as president. Former President Barack Obama did usually spend his Christmas vacations in his home state of Hawaii but did not fly there just to golf.

Last month, the president canceled a visit to Denmark because the country’s prime minister was not open to the idea of selling Greenland to the United States. His cancelation of the trip to Poland drew little initial criticism until it was learned that he spent the weekend golfing.

“To ensure that all resources of the federal government are focused on the arriving storm, I have decided to send our vice president, Mike Pence, to Poland this weekend in my place,” Trump said last week. “It’s something very important for me to be here. The storm looks like it could be a very, very big one indeed.”

On Sunday, Trump was asked if he had any message for Poland on the 80th anniversary of Nazi Germany’s invasion.

“I just want to congratulate Poland,” Trump replied, adding, “It’s a great country with great people.”

Trump has feuded with Khan since June 2017, when he misunderstood one of the mayor’s tweets following a terror attack in the British capital.

09-03-19  02:52pm - 1843 days #114
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Freddie, I tried to get an avatar for the PU site, but the site keeps rejecting me.
Or maybe I don't remember how to do it.
Trying to drag and drop a jpg file into the box does nothing.

Maybe I should hire an IT guy to help me out?
Years ago, it seemed simple to drag and drop a jpg image pic and get an avatar.
But times have changed.

But thanks for the raffle win. I will be visiting Amazon to redeem my prize.

09-02-19  05:05pm - 1844 days #112
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
I posted this comment on a thread with the same name as this thread's name: Raffle Winners.
But this thread is the real one, where they post the names of the raffle winners.
So this thread is the more legitimate thread, and the one that should be read.
-----
-----



OFF TOPIC: REPEAT: OFF TOPIC.

Freddie has been working tirelessly to get her own avatar.
She registered at the PU site on Dec 06, '18.

Her staff profile page leaves blank her experience (I assume it's work experience, but it could refer to her porn experience).

My question: should the PU members take up a collection, to donate to Freddie so she can finally get her own avatar?

Maybe PU could divert a small portion of the weekly raffle proceeds to this worthy cause?
[Rant]
[Rofl]

09-02-19  10:26am - 1844 days #3
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
The man was black, he was poor. He couldn't afford a high-priced lawyer.
So he deserved to be in prison for a life sentence, for stealing $50.

The smart ones steal millions, and if they are caught and found guilty, they serve a short sentence in a country club prison, with amenities.
And their wives and husbands cry the blues, because their theft was hardly noticeable. Many judges say that being caught for a wealthy man is punishment enough, because it's a shameful thing.

While the criminal who is poor has to admit that he is shamed by his crimes, because they have no pride to begin with.

Yet, the law is the same for everyone: the rich and the poor.
Or is it?
Is it just another lie that we are taught, growing up, that the law is the same for everyone?

08-31-19  01:55pm - 1846 days #1458
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
Trump has a big heart.
He says the firing of his personal assistant was automatic, because she said hurtful things about his kids. The remarks were off-the-record, but that didn't matter.

It also doesn't matter that Trump has no problem separating parents from their kids if the parents are illegal immigrants.

And he thinks it's good for the kids to be put in jail.

Maybe it toughens the kids up.

So: his kids are off-limits.
But the kids of illegal immigrants are trash who can be put in jail.

Trump is a man of all heart.
============
============


Trump says aide left White House because she said something 'hurtful' about his kids

HuffPost US
Mary Papenfuss
Aug 31st 2019 8:26AM

President Donald Trump told reporters Friday that his personal assistant Madeleine Westerhout had departed because she made “hurtful” comments about his children during an off-the-record dinner with journalists.

“I really think she had a bad night,” he told reporters on his way to Camp David. “I think it was unfortunate.” Still, he added, “you don’t say things like she said, which were just a little bit hurtful to some people. She mentioned a couple of things about my children.” (See the video above.)

Despite that, he appeared compassionate about Westerhout’s situation.

“She called me. She was very upset, she was very down,” Trump said. “It’s too bad. I wished her well.” Trump, who called Westerhout, 27, a “very good person” who did a great job, didn’t say if she had been fired or had resigned, only that her departure Thursday was “automatic.”


Politico reported Saturday that Westerhout resigned because she had mocked Trump’s relationship with his children at an Aug. 17 dinner near the president’s golf resort in Bedminster, New Jersey.

After a “couple of drinks,” she boasted that Ivanka and Tiffany Trump were closer to her than to their father, two sources told Politico. She also quipped that the president was so unfamiliar with Tiffany that he couldn’t pick her out in a crowd. The New York Times reported that she also talked about Trump’s eating habits, his thoughts on Tiffany’s appearance, and his youngest son, Barron.

Trump told reporters: “Tiffany is great. I love Tiffany.” The president said he would call his younger daughter when he reached Camp David.

Westerhout, a former Republican Party aide, has been with Trump since he was elected.
breaking-news logo

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Trump scolded the “dishonest media” for ignoring the rules of an off-the-record dinner. “This was an off-the-record dinner and the media blatantly violated that agreement,” an administration official told Politico. Westerhout’s confidences, however, only appeared to have been discussed later at the White House, and not to the public.

A friend of Donald Trump Jr. accused Phil Rucker of The Washington Post of “burning” Westerhout.

But Steven Ginsberg, national editor at The Washington Post, said in a statement to Politico that Rucker is “one of the best and most scrupulous reporters in the news business. He has always acted with the utmost honor and integrity and has never violated Washington Post standards or policies.”

This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

08-31-19  06:25am - 1846 days #3
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
OFF TOPIC: REPEAT: OFF TOPIC.

Freddie has been working tirelessly to get her own avatar.
She registered at the PU site on Dec 06, '18.

Her staff profile page leaves blank her experience (I assume it's work experience, but it could refer to her porn experience).

My question: should the PU members take up a collection, to donate to Freddie so she can finally get her own avatar?

She's the invisible woman at PU, hiding behind a name, with no avatar to show what she looks like in real life.
(I've read that she's into tats. Is that the reason she remains invisible?)

Maybe PU could divert a small portion of the weekly raffle proceeds to this worthy cause?


08-31-19  06:03am - 1846 days #1457
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
President Donald Trump, the Man of Action.
Uses tweets to shape US policies.
Also uses tweets to reveal US secrets.
----
----
Trump tweet raises worries about U.S. surveillance secrets

Thomson Reuters
Steve Holland
Aug 30th 2019 9:58PM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday posted on Twitter a photo of what appeared to be the site of a failed Iranian satellite launch, raising questions about whether he had disclosed U.S. surveillance secrets.

The black-and-white photo showed the fire-blasted launch site at a space center in northern Iran including a damaged gantry service tower and a downed mobile erector launcher.

Trump, in his tweet, cited the specific location of the site, saying the United States was not involved in the "catastrophic accident during final launch preparations for the Safir SLV Launch at Semnan Launch Site One in Iran."

Speaking to reporters at the White House later on Friday, Trump defended his posting of the photo and reiterated that the United States had nothing to do with the incident.

"We had a photo. I released it, which I have the absolute right to do," Trump said.

He said the Iranians "were going to set off a big missile and it didn't work out too well. Had nothing to do with us.”

The rocket exploded on its launch pad on Thursday, an Iranian official said. A U.S. official also said Iran suffered a satellite launch failure.

"I wish Iran best wishes and good luck in determining what happened at Site One," Trump said in his tweet.

Patrick Eddington, a former CIA satellite imagery analyst, said the photograph tweeted by Trump appeared to be a classified image taken by a U.S. spy satellite.

"If the president simply tweeted out an image from classified briefing that utilizes our most advanced overhead collection capabilities, it is no doubt welcome news to our adversaries," said Eddington, now a research fellow at the CATO Institute.

"While he has the authority to declassify any federal document, Twitter is not a legitimate or responsible way to do so."

A U.S. defense official told CNBC that the picture, which appeared to be a snapshot of a physical copy of the satellite image, was included in an intelligence briefing on Friday.

The Pentagon did not have any immediate comment.

The United States has warned Iran against rocket launches, fearful the technology used to put satellites into orbit could enable Tehran to develop the ballistic missile capability needed to launch nuclear warheads.

Tehran denies the U.S. accusation that such activity is a cover for ballistic missile development.

The Trump administration has ratcheted up economic pressure on Iran this year with economic sanctions to try to force it to renegotiate a pact reached with world powers in 2015 limiting its nuclear program. Trump withdrew the United States from the pact in May last year.

Trump has offered to hold talks with Iran but Tehran says first it must get relief from U.S. sanctions.

08-31-19  05:50am - 1846 days Original Post - #1
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA


Alabama man who spent 36 years behind bars after stealing $50 set free
He was convicted of robbing a bakery in 1983, which netted him $50.75, and had previously broken into a vacant service station. He was sentenced to life.
Family celebrates man's release: We've been 'trusting God that this day would come'
Aug. 30, 2019, 8:52 AM PDT / Updated Aug. 30, 2019, 2:16 PM PDT
By David K. Li

An Alabama man who has spent almost 36 years in prison after stealing $50 was released Friday under new sentencing guidelines that reset the state's three-strikes law.

Alvin Kennard, 58, had been serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole.

But his sentence was changed to time served by Judge David Carpenter in Jefferson County on Wednesday. The state's Department of Corrections had to process Kennard out of the system, which is why he wasn't immediately released after the ruling. He was released from the William E. Donaldson Correctional Facility, just outside of Bessemer, Alabama on Friday, the Alabama Department of Corrections said in a statement.


"We've just been praying and trusting in God that this day would come and it's here, and we're so grateful to God," Kennard's niece Patricia Jones told NBC affiliate WVTM.

Kennard was convicted of robbing a bakery Jan. 24, 1983, in a felony that netted him $50.75, the Birmingham News reported, citing court records.

That bakery crime came after Kennard had previously broken into a vacant service station, leading him to plead guilty to three felony counts of burglary and larceny in 1979. Due to that previous conviction, he was sentenced to life behind bars under the three-strikes provision of Alabama's Habitual Felony Offender Act.

But in 2013, the Alabama Sentencing Commission adopted new guidelines which, if they had been in place when Kennard robbed the bakery, would have made his previous crime not serious enough to trigger a life sentence without parole, defense lawyers said.

Had these new standards been in place then, Kennard couldn't have been imprisoned for any more than 20 years, his attorney Carla Crowder said. He could have been eligible for parole after 10 years.


Kennard told the judge Wednesday that he is still remorseful for his crimes.

“I’m sorry for what I did," Kennard, dressed in orange-and-white jail garb, said. "I was wrong."

The district attorney's office did not oppose the change in his sentence. Prosecutor Lane Tolbert said, however, that his office did not err in applying the law.

“But let me be clear, this is not about $50," Tolbert said.

Kennard has said that after his release, he plans to live with family in Bessemer and work in carpentry.

08-27-19  07:34am - 1850 days #2
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA
I don't enjoy tats.
But I am slowly learning to accept them, since they are popping up everywhere.

Go with the flow, or get sucked down under.

08-24-19  09:10pm - 1853 days Original Post - #1
LKLK (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,583
Registered: Jun 26, '19
Location: CA


There will be a new Obi-Wan Kenobi film with Ewan McGregor that will start shooting in 2020.
The film will be on Disney+.
Disney+ is the upcoming video on demand service that is set to launch in November 2019.

1501-1550 of 1583 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 8 14 20 30 Page 31 32 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.