Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Toadsith (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (936)  |   Threads Started (5)

651-700 of 936 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 13 Page 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next Page >

10-21-08  01:51pm - 5906 days #19
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by asmith12:


IMHO depends on what you're comparing it to. If choosing between tolerance and intolerance (such as in 1572), I definitely prefer tolerance.


That would be a situation of "the lesser of two evils", or more accurately, as tolerance isn't really an evil, it is simply inaction. Nothing gained, nothing lost. It can be preferable to intolerance in some instances not in others. In some regards, at least intolerance is action - and action sparks reaction. If the action isn't what you want, maybe the reaction will be. It would at least be a change. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-21-08  10:54am - 5906 days #16
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


HaHa, a strong statement uttered with the conviction of the young. Tolerance also means recognizing that there are differences in tastes, customs, cultures, morals etc., acknowledging that fact and learning to live with it rather than start wars in a forum, the neighborhood, country or abroad. Not very elegantly put but you know what I mean! :-)


Acceptance of a culture doesn't dictate that one must be of that culture or in anyway involved with that culture. Tolerance is often an indicator that that which is to be tolerated is at minimum a distraction and at maximum a threat. Merriam-Webster describes "tolerate" as such (when not referring to a drug or food):

"2 a : to allow to be or to be done without prohibition, hindrance, or contradiction b : to put up with <learn to tolerate one another>"

Assuming all groups of humans to be equal to all other groups of humans, it is wrong to tolerate (some will regard this as a massive assumption, but it is crucial to the argument and rather core to most of western culture). You can either accept a culture or try to change that culture until you can accept it. For example, many people speak of tolerance in regards to the hot topic of the multitude of Islamic cultures. Most of the cultures in question have doctrines of non-violence and peace. Any different culture can be strange and confusing, but despite the strangeness of many aspects of the culture, they should be free to worship their religion and be welcomed in our neighborhoods and places of commerce.

However, there are some extreme segments of the Islamic community that regularly beat their women - these segments obviously should not be accepted, but more to the point, not tolerated. Not tolerating something doesn't necessarily dictate that you immediately turn to deadly force, but you do something. Provide places of sanctuary for the abused, collect evidence and attempt to prosecute the abuser, et cetera. Tolerance could easily be seen as condoning the abuse in that scenario.

Tolerance is never a useful behavior - it is a form of limbo, dictating that the status quo is not acceptable by the tolerating party, but they are not willing to get involved for whatever reason. Tolerance perhaps is a great tool of those capable of doublethink - described as "The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." (George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four) For to tolerate you can both think well of yourself for staying out of other people's affairs while at the same time loathing the behavior of those very same people. I fear that popular media has muddled the distinction between "acceptance" and "tolerance". Open-minded and accepting people have come to use the phrase tolerance without realizing what they really are saying. Oh why can't we teach our children how to speak? ("The French never care what they do, actually, as long as they pronounce it properly.")

So while I will not argue that it is a strong statement and nor can I argue that I'm young - a condition which I work on every day and am happy to report much progress with - I must stand and say with conviction that tolerance is not acceptable. People say you can't argue opinion only facts, but I beg to differ. Opinions are all that there is to be argue, a fact, by definition, is irrefutable. So one argues against another's opinion of what is or is not fact - but why stop there? I contend that we the people are letting definitions slip away - do you realize how often I get asked to be more specific when I ask for a couple of tacos (or any other product)? I can rephrase it, but I simply can't get any more specific - a couple is two, plain and simple. It has been said that the English language has become such a dominating language due to it expanding and absorbing terminology - I have no objection to new words, I am simply saddened that people are forgetting the definitions of older words. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-21-08  09:26am - 5906 days #14
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


That's an interesting phenomenon these days. Beware of the folks who say they are on the side of "tolerance" because they most likely are the least tolerant.


I deny tolerance. Acceptance or nothing at all. Tolerance speaks of a group of people needing the approval of another. You never tolerate equals. I admit I do tolerate some things. Like deer and pigeons - I'm not willing to expend the energy necessary to exterminate them from my areas of frequent travel, so I tolerate them. "We tolerate you" simply states that we hate you but can't get rid of you within our current constraints. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-20-08  07:08pm - 5906 days #10
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I could be wrong on this one, but as far as I know all Christians are in fact Judeo-Christians because we all read the New Testament and the old Testament, and there are no Christians in the old testament.


I believe RagingBuddhist is technically correct if you say "crucifix" instead of "cross". He did say "cross", which as you pointed out is a more abstract term, but the "crucifix" is exclusively Christian, and the term Judeo-Christian is defined by Merriam-Websters as such:

"having historical roots in both Judaism and Christianity"

and perhaps even better defined by Wikipedia as such:

"...a term used to describe the body of concepts and values which are thought to be held in common by Judaism and Christianity, and considered, often along with classical Greco-Roman civilization, a fundamental basis for Western legal codes and moral values. In particular, the term refers to the common Old Testament/Tanakh as a basis of both moral traditions, including particularly the Ten Commandments; and implies a common set of values present in the modern Western World."

While Judaism and Christianity both share the Old Testament/Tanakh, that writing doesn't have any interest in the Crucifix.

Now I would say that most basic crosses, not crucifixes, can be correctly assumed to be of Christian origin these days, but most people don't know how much so many of the world's religions overlap. Symbols and traditions have been interchanged amongst so many religions that much of it is rather blurred. I must say that I do miss the crazy old days of Polytheism - those religions produced some great yarns! "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-19-08  08:41pm - 5907 days #5
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


Seems I have some radical ideas about anything involving religion. So, I'm playing it safe and not jumping in with both feet on this one because it might get ugly. But I do want to chime in with the fact that a cross is in no way related to Judaism. It's a symbol for Christianity.


Aww, jeez - now I'm all curious :-D While I don't use religion in my own life, it can certainly be a good source of entertainment (amongst many, many other things) - so feel free to share, I think if things were going to get ugly on these message boards, it would have happened long ago.

As for the Judeo-Christian comment, that term does mean the interplay of concepts and values commonly held by both Judaism and Christianity - so yes, the cross is usually associated solely with Christianity, but as pat362 pointed out, the symbol itself is far, far older than that. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-19-08  06:02pm - 5907 days #3
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Fashion is definitely a strong possibility, but it may also be due to a religious upbringing and not really very reliant on the model's own religious beliefs. For example, I was raised Roman Catholic, granted rather loosely, but I was enough involved that I went through confirmation. After that ceremony my mother gave me a gold cross necklace to wear around my neck - and while I do not attend church and would proclaim myself Agnostic if asked, I wear the cross necklace (when it isn't broken like now) as it pleases my mother. She cares, so out of respect for her I wear it as much as I can. (Which reminds me... I need to get that damn thing repaired.)

At any rate, an amazing amount of people in America say their religion is an important and significant part of their life. I understand it can bring a sense of purpose to people and I would never deny them that comfort as long as they don't insist on imposing their believes on others. I personally have little use for religion. While I won't argue against it as a possibility, following its own definitions it can't be proven or disproven, that makes Atheism as much a religion as any other - I simply find the whole topic rather silly and am happy to dictate my life toward my own goals for happiness, whatever they may be today.

That said, it is possible that a number of the models are heavily religious. I would say most of the models come from rather modest backgrounds, which tends to be the strong-hold of religion. With the advent of Gonzo porn, directors are less inclined to require the models to wear on not wear specific items - often they appear in clothing they've purchased themselves for their job - so if they arrive wearing a cross, most directors probably don't care - as long as it doesn't get in the way of the action of course. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-19-08  05:48pm - 5907 days #2
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
I used to use GetRight (pay), but now I use DownThemAll! exclusively. It is free though they ask for PayPal donations if you love their service. It fully integrates with Firefox, so messing around with passwords is no problem.

I use Google Chrome exclusively at work, but I haven't tried to use any Download Managers with it. That might become an issue if I switch over to it at home. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-19-08  05:45pm - 5907 days #37
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Question, how can a person petition/ask and annonymous to remove the bad rating if they do not know who it is?
Seems we could have some way to ask that its removed from that user? Or is there and option to do that ?


Thanks.


I believe if you reply to that anonymous rating, the person that rated you will be notified. If I recall correctly, I accidentally rated someone anonymously and had that happen.

I love your new Avatar, by the way :-) All you need is a cartoon stripper to be resting on top of the candy corn, lol "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-18-08  09:12pm - 5908 days #5
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I'm with the Raging Buddhist and Pat362 on this (Tweedle-dee-dum-dah). ;) First, what's the biggest and/or with the best bitrate? Then, if it's DivX, I'll go for that. If not, the nearly ubiquitous WMV.

DivX vids just play more smoothly. The player has fewer quirks and seems as if it was written by some smart people. A-hem ...


Ditto. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-18-08  09:10pm - 5908 days #2
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
I recommend contacting them through their contact us page. It is rare for a company to not want to accept a membership fee from a user. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-18-08  09:08pm - 5908 days #2
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Never heard of it, but they use CCBill so I doubt they are too sketchy. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-18-08  09:04pm - 5908 days #6
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
As of right now? ATK Natural & Hairy. Though I currently have memberships to the following:

Argentina Triple X (and associated ATX Network)
Yummy Mama (soon to expire)
Naked News (I really should watch the news more often...)
VideoBox (I don't download from them, just stream flash)
Slipshine (Also don't download from them, just another site for comics, these just happen to be adult.)
ALS Scan (Annoying layout, but I'll probably start mass-downloading from here soon)
American Vice (still exploring) "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-18-08  12:55am - 5909 days #2
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Okie dokie, I just spent an hour writing up a reply only to have the computer delete it because instead of popping up a "You are over your character limit" window it just refreshed the page. I'll try to refrain from beating my computer to death with my keyboard and rewrite it later. ::sigh:: "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-16-08  01:25pm - 5911 days #27
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Ah, Toadsith, whatever would I do without you gentlemen and this forum. Your advice worked like a charm. I looked in all the settings and could never find the aspect ratio. A right click, who would have thought! :-) Thanks.


Haha, glad it worked, the computer I was on at the time didn't have VLC installed so I wasn't 100% sure I was right :-P

Back when I used to teach computer basics to New York State Employees (like "how to use the mouse") I drilled a motto into their heads: "When in doubt, right click." Of course, if that was the first law of computer basics, the zeroth law was: "If it's broke, reboot." If only I could get my grandfather to learn the basics though, the man seems to believe the computer is capable of read his mind but is just being difficult and that is why buttons aren't magically changing their function for his needs. At least he seems to have figured out Netflix... "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-15-08  06:48pm - 5911 days #25
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


An additional question. For some reason some of my widescreen videos from FTV play in the 4:3 format rather than 16:9. They are definitely HD and definitely widescreen and play that way in wmp. Where is the setting so that this new player will play a video as recorded? Or did I click the wrong button somewhere? :-)


If you right click on the video while it is playing, a menu should pull up and then you can mouse over "Video" and there should be a second menu with "Aspect Ratio" listed - then just select which ever aspect ratio you'd prefer :-)

(I'm typing this from memory, let me know if it seems wrong and I'll check the program directly, lol) "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-15-08  10:47am - 5912 days #2
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Excluding basic Anime, how about full-hardcore Hentai?

Titanime is a rather large site dedicated to Hentai involving Anime girls with very large breasts. It is all uncensored and DVD quality WMV with subtitles burned into the image. The support people for the site are quite helpful as well - they've had issues with some of their rips (audio wasn't matching the video) but they responded fast and usually had the problem fixed within a couple days. They have a few other sites, but this one is the oldest and largest. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-14-08  11:31am - 5913 days #4
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Riffy:


OK, when I dump my footage on my computer and edit/tart it up etc it shows as 1024x576 pixels (16:9)with no distortion.

However I've seen not only my own videos, but others report the same size video as 720x576 pixels as if its running at 4:3 not 16:9.


My guess is your video editing software, once you complete the editing and tell it to publish the video, is then encoding the edited video in that resolution, adding black bars at the top and bottom to provide 16:9 content within a 4:3 format. I recommend you check the settings of the video editing software - either in the preferences or as you are publishing it, there will be some form of settings or profiles that designate what resolution, compression method, bit rate, et cetera - that the final video is being encoded at.

Let me know exactly which editing program you are using (and what version number) and I should be able to find you a more specific answer. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-14-08  11:07am - 5913 days #3
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


But one thing has me curious, they also added that it may take 2 - 4 weeks (depending on the bank) before the credit shows up in my account.


I think that is general ass-covering. In all likelihood you'll see that credit very quickly, but certain circumstances could slow things down - like holidays, for instance. Companies often like to warn about worst case scenarios in this sort of thing to try to stop customers from contacting them and accusing them of bad business practices just because a transaction is taking a little longer than expected (and probably in a manner that is outside their control). I doubt it will take more than 4 business days for the credit to show up. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-14-08  10:36am - 5913 days #23
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


I took a while - but succeeded at last - Thanks for the help!!


Any time! :-D "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-14-08  10:35am - 5913 days #22
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


You can decide which folder to use for the snapshots, www. Just click on tools, then preferences, then videos and you will find the choice near the bottom of the screen that pops up. It also gives you the option to save the snapshops in jpg rather than png.


Good Tip - thanks! :-) "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-13-08  08:29pm - 5913 days #22
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Toadsith. The link you posted is dead now.


I hate when the hosting sites do that - try it now. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-13-08  07:09pm - 5913 days #20
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


OK, instead he should make You Tube infomercials talking about the dinosaur / caveman wars and how pornography ruined his plans for America


You know, if Scientology and Creationism merged, would they say our history looked something like this?

The Picture oft Captioned with "Holy Shit: This is Awesome" "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo
Edited on Oct 13, 2008, 08:28pm (Toadsith: ::grumble grumble:: stupid image shack...)

10-13-08  07:02pm - 5913 days #15
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Thank you, Toadsith! Thank you, Leo!


Haha, any time! I'm glad it worked, I know how mysterious Vista can be :-P "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-13-08  06:40pm - 5913 days #12
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Thanks for the offer of help, Toadsith. I am using WMP 11 for Vista and under tools > option> there's nothing to be found that would point to file associations unless it is very well hidden. If you ever find a way on your other computer to un-couple me from WMP I will be deeply grateful. :-)


Since my home computer runs XP instead of (evil) Vista, I thought despite it being WMP 11, that it might still be different. So I found this page on File Associations in Vista, perhaps this will be of assistance :-)

Ask Leo!: Where did file associations go in Vista? "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-13-08  12:53pm - 5914 days #9
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Thanks Monahan, I got the player and love it! One problem though, I associated all formats with my new player but Windows Media Player is hesitant in giving up .mpg and wmv. files. Where on the WMP do I find "associations" so that I can uncheck the two formats. I looked high and low but can't find them. By the way, I realize that I can play the files with the new player by right-clicking and then choosing it but don't want to go through the constant bother. I also saw some replies referring to watching a movie in cartoon effect. How do I do that? Sounds interesting! :-)


Traditionally with Windows Media Player, you need to find the File menu (if it is hidden) and then, under "Tools", select "Options...". That will open the Options window which is tabulated, and one of the Tabs should say "File Types" (or perhaps "Associations"). The current computer I'm running is using Media Player 10, if this doesn't work, let me know and I'll check out how to do it on Media Player 11 on my other computer later. However, I'm pretty sure it is basically the same with all recent versions of the program. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-13-08  10:45am - 5914 days #35
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Hey toadsith, my personal view is that 15% would still be too large and I prefer my logos on the bottom right because that's the last place I look at. I hardly notice them there ... as long as they are not 15% of the picture then you can't help but notice. I totally agree when it comes to monochrome and translucent.


Anything over 15% would be huge - that example image was 8% the width and 6% the heighth of the video. I was just trying to give a maximum cover-all circumstances rule. I think all things considered - everybody knows that the smaller you can get away with the better.

Originally Posted by messmer:


And talking about TV, most Canadian broadcasters have their logos on the bottom right and translucent.


Originally Posted by Riffy:


TV watermarks here in Britain tend to be top left and generally pretty unobtrusive.


I suppose it isn't that surprising that there isn't a world wide standard on this, hell we can't even agree on standardized video formats most of the time. I would still contend that in terms of human perception, the bottom left corner would be the least noticed for most of western society just because of the way we read - but keep the logo quiet and any corner should do fine. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-12-08  07:07pm - 5914 days #32
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Riffy:


Cheers
Just so I've got your complete view on this at least...

What's the LARGEST a watermark can be before its a pain?

What's the best position for it? Bottom right seems most popular?


I'd say try to keep it less than 15% of the screen. It should be monochrome and translucent (opacity should be 25%). While most porn producers do like the bottom right, the proper position is bottom left. This is because, humans taught to read standard left to right, top to bottom style writing scan images the same way. That is they look first at center of the top third of the image, then they look at the top left corner and scan down to the bottom right corner. So the bottom left corner is the easiest place to ignore something. To this effect, you'll notice most of the broadcasting companies put their watermark in this position.

I captured a frame from an episode of the FOX Television show "Fringe" and mapped it out a bit.

FOX Watermark on "Fringe" "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-12-08  03:46pm - 5915 days #29
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I think on sites where its hard to tell whats offered ya that would be nice. Seems that others get confused like 1day for example awsome site but ppl say cons because not allot of BG hardcore. But the site doesnt say BG hardcore lol But if it did have lots and didnt say it , would be nice to know too.


Ah - basically explain when a site's preview page and the actual content differ - gotcha, that makes sense. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-12-08  03:40pm - 5915 days #27
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Riffy:


Well said Toadsith.

I see where you're coming from.

I'm thinking my watermark is perhaps a wee bit intrusive although not as bad as some.. maybe I'll have a look at this... yes

Thanks
Riffy


No prob :-) Always glad to hear from webmasters. Also, do note that, for me at least, a water mark isn't a big issue. It is more of an annoyance at best - with the exceptions of the few that place water marks over the focus of a picture or move it around the picture so you can't learn to ignore it. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-12-08  03:38pm - 5915 days #26
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I think one thing I see missing is details on solo sites that do not give clear details on the poses etc.
I have joined some sites that look nasty ( a good way) and are tame, then like digital desire for example looks weak and there are some intense very intense solo masterbation scenes but the site look tame by glance. So whhat I am getting at is is it just stripping and boob play or tools and intesity? Inquiring minds would like to know. One being mine and I see it absent from 98% of the sites do not give detail on solos as much as other review for BG GG ETC.

Thanks


So you are saying that type of action present on the site should be described in better detail? That seems reasonable enough, the only potential downfall is that what one viewer calls "nasty" another viewer calls "the missionary position". None-the-less, I'll make a note in my PU Cheat Sheet and try to describe a representative scene so the viewers get a taste of what they'd be purchasing, content wise. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-12-08  12:23pm - 5915 days #6
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


Perfect. Last challenge solved. And the various effects are fun to play with. The "cartoon" effect on a porn video creates some very interesting snapshots.

Thanks again Toadsith. You are clearly the "go to" guy on PU.


Glad to have been of assistance :-) In truth, you just happened to have posted this at a good time as I recently found the player through another site and had been playing with it quite a bit.

And that cartoon effect is awesome, I hadn't tried it on porn - it reminds me quite a bit of those rotoscoped movies like silly "Waking Life". Of course, the effect can't top Diesel's attempt at merging porn and cartoon:

Ad for Diesel's 30th Birthday Parties "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-12-08  12:06pm - 5915 days #4
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Toadsith: I have not been able to locate any "file-assosiation" after installing - any idea?


In the File Menu, under "Tools" click "Preferences..." (or just press CTRL+P).

This will open the ridiculously large preferences window, there select the "Interface Settings" section: The top icon, it looks like a green cone underneath a orange skin that's peeling off. On that page of settings, you'll see a border around a group of settings that is labeled "Instances" - and there should be a button within that group that says "Association Setup".

Pressing that will open up a giant list of file types with check boxes next to them. Simply check (or uncheck) the ones you want hit "Apply" and you should be done :-) "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-12-08  11:54am - 5915 days #23
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Riffy:


Hi Toadsith
Regarding your comment in your excellent article here about watermarks.
I personally don't mind them as long as they're not too big or obtrusive.
I use them on my videos purely to help ID them if they turn up somewhere they shouldn't.


I certainly understand the drive behind watermarks as a necessity to protect one's content from being stolen by competitors, I simply object to it on an aesthetic basis. It can be learned to ignore, but the simple matter is that it's still modifying the video image at all times and not serving in anyway to help the story line, improve the style of the content or anything. Essentially it is there for the benefit of the content providers not the viewers.

A lot of sites advertise that they provide DVD quality video. One pretty universal factor with DVDs is the lack of a water mark. Most television shows have watermarks showing up frequently, but when they go onto DVD, that watermark is gone. Still, I'd love for porn content providers to learn from the big TV networks. The watermarks the networks use is usually a very basic corporate logo that is quite small, entirely monochrome, and at least 50% translucent. A lot of major sites provide their full web address in full color with full opacity - that is a helluva lot more distracting than it needs to be.

So I understand why watermarks are often a necessary evil, but I will still rejoice in any review whenever I find a site that doesn't use them. For if we don't critique the aesthetic of the content, what use are we as reviewers? "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-12-08  11:42am - 5915 days #2
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


The one negative is that, unlike WMP, you cannot adjust color and/or contrast.


Click the "Extended Settings" Button, it looks like an audio equalizer, that will open the Extended Settings Window. On that window select the "Video Effects" tab and you will find all of the basic color, saturation, contrast, gamma, et cetera settings in the "Basic" section. It will also do some really crazy stuff, like split up the video into multiple chunks for a panel of monitors on the wall, overlay logos, or change the image geometry - all in real time. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-11-08  11:15am - 5916 days #21
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


I can pin it for a week but that's gonna be about as long as we'll want to have it sticky. It's a good thread, to be sure but we're not looking to have permanantly pinned threads at this time.


Ok, cool - thanks :-) "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-10-08  11:49am - 5917 days #2
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
I thought you could post a link in a Site Comment, just not in a Site Review. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-09-08  10:23pm - 5917 days #18
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Any chance this thread could be made into a sticky thread?

I think it would tell a lot to new reviewers about what the community is looking for in a good review. :-D "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-09-08  04:07pm - 5918 days #17
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Here's a few more titles for times:

"Bears on Barack" (interracial burly man gay porn)
"AIG: Behind the Scenes" (Anally Intrusive Groupsex giving it to America)
"Impaling Palin" (clueless hockey mom MILF sex)
"McPain" (old men luring naive American's into Gitmo style BDSM)
"Hard Times on Pennsylvania Avenue II" (powerful politicians find they can now only afford street walker's: not to be confused with Volume I starring Bill Clinton)

Yes, the possiblities are endless.

Also, seeing how little clout "W" has left I'm waiting for him to start appearing in Viagra commercials on tv.


Haha, those are quality

One has to appreciate Porn's history of terribly punny parody titles, lol

I will be curious to see what happens to ol' Dubbya after office - my guess is he'll largely disappear from the public eye. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-09-08  04:04pm - 5918 days #24
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Taking the website overseas is a novel idea but won't work for Max. So long as he remains in the US taking the servers somewhere else won't work because he's still under US jurisdiction. He'd have to sell off his site to someone else to escape that one.

He's got some pretty good issues on appeal but it wouldn't surprise me if he pulls a Roman Polanski and bails out overseas if things start looking bad.


Indeed you are right, it would only protect the content of the site - I figured fleeing the country was a strong possibility for him, I just would like the website to find refuge overseas as well, lol

Let's hope the appeal is successful and this farce can be put to rest. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-09-08  10:58am - 5918 days #2
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
This should definitely be a sticky post!

Here are some more:

BTW = By The Way
TANSTAAFL = There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
DRM = Digital Rights Management
YMMV = Your Mileage May Vary
POS = Piece Of Shit
DPP = Double Pussy Penetration
DAP = Double Anal Penetration
OMG = Oh My God
NFW = No Fucking Way
AFK = Away From Keyboard

Also, MILF occasionally shows up as MILTF.

It should be noted that the Military wouldn't just use Abracadabra without deciding it should be an acronym itself:

Abbreviations and Related Acronyms Associated with Defense and Business and Radio Electronics "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo
Edited on Oct 09, 2008, 11:19am

10-09-08  02:38am - 5918 days #21
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Oh! I just realized I forgot to mention my favorite Internet Acronym to date: WSTS (Weeping Silently To Self)

My Father & I did once try to start one, but it never really caught on. It was WWT: Willy Wonka That. The acronym was a reference to the original "Charlie in the Chocolate Factory" movie in which Willy Wonka would make a statement that was completely the opposite of what he meant to say, after which he would stop and say "Wait - stop. Reverse that." and then continue on.

The acronym was for use in chatrooms or instant messengers. A user could simply type "WWT" after a statement that had a typo, misspelling, grammatical error or some other obvious error that the other user could easily decipher. The "WWT" was simply to let the other user know that you knew you made an error in the previous line and weren't a blithering idiot, that way the conversation could quickly continue without an awkward self correction statement that brings the conversation flow to an abrupt stop. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-09-08  02:25am - 5918 days #20
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Thanks for all that fine info.
Was not sure if the content could be regarded as sarcastic og alike - in connection with the winning. It was not my intention, anyway..


I think you are the last person anyone would assume was making a sarcastic or spiteful remark, but I'm glad my little article was helpful. I always like tangential topics that give me an excuse to write up one of my essays :-D "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo
Edited on Oct 09, 2008, 02:28am

10-08-08  10:36pm - 5918 days #13
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Reading some of the comments that Shap has made in Twisty's forum or Alex has made in the Director's blog at ALS Scan, I don't agree that the web site aspect of the adult industry is stronger than ever. Alex has mentioned that overall memberships to porn sites are down and many sites are trying to decrease their costs. You can see that with sites such as DDF's where they have gone to recycling old material for a large percentage of their updates while raising their prices. Twisty's, according to Shap, has pulled back by contracting with less European porn producers. Internet porn was tied into the whole dot com boom and I'll bet that it was easier a few years ago to just toss up a site and have membership come roaring in than it is now. Obviously there is no lack of porn sites, but is the whole scene as much a Field of Dreams as it once was? I doubt it.


No doubt, even though more money is being spent on pornography than ever before - there needs to be a culling of the herd. It happens again and again with every industry; the car industry seems to be go through it again right now. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-08-08  09:28pm - 5918 days #21
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Well, I guess it doesn't necessarily pay to produce and mail "extreme porn" in Florida. Max got tagged with 46 months in federal prison and his company got fined $75k but he is free on bond pending his appeal.

Just for the record, if Max does go to prison you can sleep well at night knowing that the US tax payers will spending about $24,000 per year to keep him in Club Fed ... don't we have enough financial problems as it is?


Ridiculous - I see they have shut down his website as well. I bloody hate censorship. I hope they move the servers overseas and resume business. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-08-08  09:18pm - 5918 days #30
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
I just realized I never replied to this thread and am surprised to see that my numero uno "deal breaker" wasn't directly listed. That is the model's face - good body, good performance, et cetera - that can all be destroyed by a model with a less than attractive face. Porn is a factor of two things for me.

One is the fantasy of the activity being performed - roleplay, be it simple or complex, is a crucial factor. Porn doesn't require too much consideration for the viewer's willing suspension of disbelief because the activities being recorded are really being performed. Granted the best porn ties in an engaging story that in and of itself can entertain you, but like documentaries of sharks eating things - the viewer is going to be engaged, even if we threw that baby seal into the tank with the shark, it is still a shark eating a baby seal! So curiosity drives a large amount of my porn viewing.

The second factor is simply that I love looking at beautiful women. Be they fashion models, porn stars, or just a person I walked by on the street. For me, beauty begins at the face. I can appreciate a particular example of a specific body part, but if gut-wrenching face is attached to that, I won't be able to keep it from my mind. In video, action can overcome a mediocre face - but in photos, I just have to move on.

I agree that I'm not wildly interested in continuous close-ups of a model's face - though an occasional close-up might be interesting. However, on the same note - I tire of my screen being filled up with genitals slapping together. I like the camera to step back most of the time, to casually watch the whole show and only occasionally punctuate the scene with a proper good closeup.

There are many other things I might nitpick about - a collective of little problems can easily prevent a download. However, to answer the question simply: The overarching, single, most common reason I skip a download is finding I'm not attracted to the model's face. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-08-08  08:47pm - 5918 days #11
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I'm in my 40's so I remember a time when special effects were called "special", partly because you had to pretend you didn't see the wires or the stop motion. You know what I also remember about those movies. The content had to be number one because they couldn't rely on special effects to dazzle us. That isn't the case with most movies today. All flash and no susbstance. Hell, a CGI Chihuahua movie made 29,000,000$ on the weekend. You tell me that 5yrs from now, a single person will remember that cinematic masterpiece.

I don't think the porn industry is stronger today as much as there is just more of it. There is more porn being produced in a month than was done in a year. A large part is the fact that once upon a time you filmed on celluloid and that was expensive. Not everyone could afford it. Today you can buy a camera and off you go making gonzo porn.

That is one of the reasons why I think that porn is in trouble. There used to be 3 TV networks CBS, NBC, and ABC. For decades they ruled the airwaves. You could argue that they are still relevant, but I don't think you can say that they are still top dog. In many ways the same can be said for porn studios. I've seen over half a dozen top ranking porn studios disapear just in the last year.

Can you name me 3 porn movies from the last 5-10 yrs that you still enjoy? Could you name 3 from 10+ ago?

I don't think you need a large budget to make good porn. You only need a idea and the talent to make it happen. I think the first is covered, but that second one will need some serious help.


I cannot argue that there isn't a large quantity of nonsensical drivel being produced in both pornography, cinema and television; because frankly there is. There is just so much content being produced that you have to sift through that much more to find the memorable creations. The majority of what was produced in the past in all three industries was terrible, but since there was less of it, you were likely to see a much larger percentage of it. That made it all the more likely that you'd see the gem hidden in the refuse. The fact that someone actually green-lit the blasted Chihuahua movie amazes me - that it is making money, eh - less amazing. You tie in enough brands and advertise enough - you can sell anything for a while. There are still quality movies and TV shows and pornos being made - you just have to search longer and harder for them.

For porn, there is niche content being made accessible today that was only a tickle in the back of the mind for people 20 years ago. I would say that no single studio is as powerful as the major studios 20 years ago, so in that sense I suppose you could argue that specific aspects of the industry aren't stronger. The sheer number of content producers around right now remind me of the movie theater battles that happened 10 years ago - everybody scrambling for a piece of the market. The theaters have largely weeded themselves out; the strong survive. The problem with the internet is that real estate isn't an issue - there is always room for more. Yet the internet market is still very young, and I think the weeding process has only just begun.

The main issue is that much of what was great about old pornos were the lengths they went to emulate movies. I really think the budget is factoring in hard right now. The average porn film is shot in a single day - very few retakes - they simply keep rolling and then edit out the errors. To do proper movie making, you need people on set day after day. You need to film on different locations, you need to give your performers time to memorize and rehearse the script. All this costs money that many studios don't have.

Take Kink.com as an example. Especially for a niche content producer, they have a considerable amount of money. They produce props and have bought an entire Armory as a monster location set. Even they rarely have models around for multiple days for a single shoot. Modern studios have so much money tied up in delivery of the content that I think production of the content takes the brunt of the cost cutting. I believe that as customers get more discerning, the studios will get weeded out and individual studios will be able to work on larger budget projects.

Still, even today - good content is being made. You asked 3 porn movies from the past 5 to 10 years that I still enjoy? Absolute #1 is "Captain Mongo's Porno Playhouse" (2001, VCA). It has a hilarious script, an energetic cast and a wonderful set. I own the film and have watched it more times than I can count. #2 would have to be "Beat The Devil" (2003, Digital Playground) - it is a shameless rip-off of the BMW short film of the same name (directed by Tony Scott) - but it again has a great cast and fun writing, so rewatching it is enjoyable. Finally, #3 would be Sex Shot (1999, Private) - this film leans more heavily on the director of photography, sets and choreography to make itself memorable, but memorable it is - and again I have seen it many times.

I will grant you that it is more of a chore to think of memorable films in the past 10 years than in the history of pornography prior to the last 10 years. Much of what is produced is gonzo content - which is cheap, easy, and lives for the moment. Gonzo focuses on specific instances, a double penetration, an episode of squirting, a specific position - those are what they are selling to their audience - instant gratification of a specific fantasy instance. While they can achieve this with remarkable efficiency, it serves to render the films unmemorable. To a certain degree, I believe the content producers are counting on that. If you remembered their previous films you might not have interest in seeing their new content, which usually provides the same stunts with new actors. Still, my selection of films listed above shows that some people are still taking the time to do pornos more reminiscent of film. I'm pleased with the ease of access we have to content these days, be it the old films of the past, or strange new ones made today - I think there isn't a better time to be viewing porn than today. There may be a load of mediocrity out there, but I still see a bright future ahead. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo
Edited on Oct 08, 2008, 08:50pm

10-08-08  06:33pm - 5918 days #9
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


Not to disagree with any of you gentlemen, but take a look at the following. It's someones reasoning of why porn is in trouble. It's based on a article called "Rude Awakening" written in the Financial Times. I actually agree with everything that he says.


That piece is nice and nostalgic, but it hardly states that the industry is in any form of financial trouble. While I admit that I like older porn a bit more than most modern porn, I don't think anyone can argue that the industry isn't stronger today than it was yesterday. The aesthetic of the industry has changed quite a bit over the years, especially in the past 20 years.

Yet in the same manner, so has Hollywood - editing, lighting, camera work, diction - it has all changed drastically. I love the old films, a number of my favorite films are 50 or more years old - but I don't want to transport back to that era - when special effects was often a bag of flour. The culture has changed and what we expect from movies has changed - but cinema is a very young art form. I think we will see returns to old styles when they come in fashion and new styles, unthinkable to us now, will arise as well.

Perhaps at some point a large studio will decide to fund a talented director with a big vision for a porn film - and classic, movie-grade porn will return again, in some new form. It is something to hope for, and with the amount of money this industry is making, I shall dare to hope that it is not far off. So I say we shouldn't curse the success of the industry's current doctrine of fast, cheap and out of control. It may indeed be the very vessel for the return of cinematic art to pornography. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-08-08  04:31pm - 5919 days #17
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


BTW, Drooler - in this thread I think I made an error, a mistanke with words (english) - when I finish a sentence about your winnings with a LOL - I thought LOL meant something like a smiley or alike - but guess now it stands for "lots of laughs"? (Is that right?)
Nothing to laugh about concerning yours, mine or other PU's winnings.....


It has become popular to equate LOL with Lots Of Laughs. However, its origin is different, though only slightly. Spawning from the world of the Internet Chatroom, LOL was designed to indicate that a joke was so funny the user was literally Laughing Out Loud (despite the probable fact that they were sitting alone). LOL quickly became the base for all sorts of abbreviations. Probably its most popular child is the ROFLOL (Rolling On Floor Laughing Out Loud), later that was even shortened to simply ROFL.

With the rise of LOL, the Era of Internet Acronyms was upon us. Many Internet venues now create so many of their own acronyms that their conversations are rendered entirely unintelligible for outside parties. Still, as the Internet has become an ever more important cultural feature, many of its acronyms have come into common usage in everyday interactions.

Like Emoticons, the acronyms of the Internet are another example of how much it is influencing our culture. It is important to note that LOL and its kin, are not even remotely the first acronyms to break out of their subculture of origin and become accepted by the mainstream culture. The military has an absolute love for acronyms, often known for creating contrived-acronyms, has brought numerous acronyms into popular culture - the most popular might be FUBAR and SNAFU. (That's Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition/Repair and Situation Normal, All Fucked Up - respectively.) So it is of no surprise that a subculture with ever increasing number of participants like the Internet finds its acronyms permeating the mainstream culture. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-08-08  02:36pm - 5919 days #7
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Toadsith.

Addition to one of your ideas. "Dow goes down on Jones"

Some good ideas for film names there though....better get your name on them before they do, might be able to get some royalties.


lol - that's even better!

Maybe for gay porn: "Freddie Mac Feels The Bear" "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

10-08-08  02:27pm - 5919 days #5
Toadsith (0)
Active User



Posts: 936
Registered: Dec 07, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Drooler:


LOL, that was a good one!

They'd have done better by issuing commodities futures in Jenna Haze's ability to have a real good time. And would have given new meaning to the terms "call" and "put." ;)


LOL

I'm just curious to see what will be the first financial themed porn film, I mean Playboy is already recruiting for another edition of "The Babes of Wall Street". I'm thinking somebody will have to release "Fannie Mae Goes To Ball Street", or "Freddie Mac Buys Some Prime Ladies". "S & P 500: The Sexy and Petite Orgy", or simply "Dow Goes Down". The possibilities are endless! "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!"

Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo

651-700 of 936 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 13 Page 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.08 seconds.