|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
Wittyguy (0)
|
| 651-700 of 1139 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 13 | Page 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 22 | 23 | Next Page > |
| 06-02-09 08:11pm - 5681 days | #15 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:35am | |
|
||
| 05-29-09 06:26pm - 5685 days | #32 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:27am | |
|
||
| 05-29-09 12:18pm - 5686 days | #30 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:26am | |
|
||
| 05-27-09 08:21pm - 5687 days | #23 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:26am | |
|
||
| 05-27-09 04:05pm - 5687 days | #51 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
We can now add India on the list of places not visit; at least not to surf porn there. In another misguided attempt to control everyone's desire to look at porn the Indians decided to jump on the bandwagon and go way overboard as many countries seem to do. This law, which hasn't taken effect quite yet, makes it a crime to even look any pornographic webpage punishable by years in jail and monster ass fines. Publish anything pornographic on the web, same punishment. Post a picture or transmit one via your cell phone of some bikini clad Indian babe without her consent, same thing as looking at porn. Committing cyber terrorism or online identity theft in India? The punishment is about the same as looking at porn. So, add another country that the PU staff can't ever go visit without being prosecuted. Don't worry though, pretty much any Indian government agency can monitor online and cell traffic as they chose and investigate without search warrants. All Indian ISP's will have to retain all information on users and sent messages too. Oh yeah, if the "integrity" of the Indian state is threatened, the government can yank webaccess at any time. Once again, here's a law that really serves no purpose other than to notify the public that nothing is private on the net and that the government can do what it wants when it wants if you break the rules. Shouldn't the Indian government really be more worried about population control and actually feeding the people it already has? However the law does create great promise for political intrigue. Worried about being re-elected? Plant some porn on your opponents computer or email inbox or plant some printouts of web porn in their house or car and get them arrested. Unhappy with your boss or coworker? Do the same. Gotta love life lived by the book of dirty tricks. Edited on May 27, 2009, 04:15pm | |
|
||
| 05-27-09 03:08pm - 5687 days | #2 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Spam. | |
|
||
| 05-26-09 11:44pm - 5688 days | #16 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:26am | |
|
||
| 05-26-09 04:18pm - 5688 days | #8 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:25am | |
|
||
| 05-26-09 11:49am - 5689 days | #9 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Just wondering if anyone saw the new Terminator and what they thought about it. | |
|
||
| 05-26-09 11:46am - 5689 days | #14 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:06pm | |
|
||
| 05-26-09 11:35am - 5689 days | #20 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:07pm | |
|
||
| 05-22-09 11:53am - 5693 days | #73 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 12:57pm | |
|
||
| 05-22-09 11:49am - 5693 days | #10 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:06pm | |
|
||
| 05-21-09 04:49pm - 5693 days | #2 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:06pm | |
|
||
| 05-21-09 12:44pm - 5693 days | #71 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 12:57pm | |
|
||
| 05-20-09 11:16pm - 5694 days | #61 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 12:56pm | |
|
||
| 05-20-09 12:31pm - 5694 days | #2 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Pat, you're fired. Oh wait, you work in the Canadian branch office. That's punishment enough. Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:07pm | |
|
||
| 05-20-09 12:27pm - 5695 days | #6 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:44pm | |
|
||
| 05-19-09 05:30pm - 5695 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:43pm | |
|
||
| 05-19-09 02:19pm - 5695 days | #49 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
I blatantly stole from Toadsiths earlier post (post number 7 above) and put together my own modified "Toadsith Review Cheat Sheet" that adds and subtracts from his original list to provide what I think is a better review platform: VIDEO CONTENT * Screen size / resolution and is HD available? * Any DRM or any download limits? * Watermarks? (only mention if annoyingly large or block out the action) * Video Quality? (Crisp, fuzzy, average, etc.) * Number of Videos? (preferably by category: HC, lez, solo, etc.) * Full Length Videos or clips or both? * Streaming video options available if any? * Avg. Video Length? (Mention only if very short or very long, TBP does mention this in their reviews) * Download options? (WMV, Mpeg, Quicktime, etc.) * Download Managers? (only if you tried to use one, Badandy will love you for this) * Download Speeds? (fast, OK, or slow -- mention download bitrates if consistent and you know what they are)? PHOTO CONTENT * Photo Resolution (mention largest size available)? * Watermarks (only mention if annoyingly large or cover the action)? * Photo Quality (grainy, poorly lit, sharp, out of focus, etc.)? * Zip Files and if zip available in multiple photo sizes? If there is a problem with zip names please note this. * Number of Sets in various categories (hardcore, lez, solo, etc.) * Matched to Video? (purely optional, also good to know if pics have less action than the vids as they sometimes do). * Average number of pics per set if possible SITE DESIGN AND GENERAL QUALITY * Search Engine? If so, is it good (can search under mulitple options like body type, boob size, action, etc.) or less so (no search or just categories)? * Search by model name and/or model directory and is directory complete? * Site Design? (only mention if really bad or really good) * Update schedule? (once a day, once a week, etc.) and if site, if a network then "sites", is still updating with new content. * Advertising? (Mention if annoying or too much) * Cross sales on signup? (always note if this is the case). * Problems with billing or cancellation? (others might be best served by posting a comment separate from the review). * Lots of deadlinks or nonloading features? (Again, note only if a problem with this). * Note if any problems getting timed out on a site so that donwloads can't finish. * If a network, number of sites and general content on the various sites. MODELS / CONTENT * Exclusive content or not so much if you know? * Originality (only mention if a unique or well done niche)? * Models Attractiveness? * Amateur / Professional in terms of models and quality? * Good Angles or Lighting? (optional, discuss if very good or very bad). EXTRAS * Bonus Sites (only mention if decent quality)? Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 12:56pm | |
|
||
| 05-14-09 07:24pm - 5700 days | #4 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:05pm | |
|
||
| 05-14-09 04:06pm - 5700 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Some of the girls I've seen on the previews seem pretty young - as in questionably 18. I'm sort of thinking that these sites are taking some chances with all the rage about child porn, especially pics that minors take of themselves and pass around. Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:04pm | |
|
||
| 05-14-09 03:35pm - 5700 days | #15 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
MyXXXpass has a 3 day full access trial for $1. I just reviewed this one and it's pretty good and mostly exclusive. | |
|
||
| 05-14-09 11:42am - 5701 days | #2 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Sorry to hear that man. Look forward to seeing your come back after a while. | |
|
||
| 05-11-09 07:44pm - 5703 days | #7 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:26pm | |
|
||
| 05-11-09 11:31am - 5704 days | #50 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:46am | |
|
||
| 05-08-09 05:38pm - 5706 days | #4 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Hell, people don't have homes any more. Public sex is all we got left! Now, if I can just find some babe willing to throw down in the cheeseburger wrappers in that bin behind McDonalds .... | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 10:15pm - 5709 days | #12 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:05pm | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 06:23pm - 5709 days | #2 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:51am | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 02:39pm - 5709 days | #45 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:46am | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 01:19pm - 5709 days | #3 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x . Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:05pm | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 01:08pm - 5709 days | #43 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:46am | |
|
||
| 05-04-09 05:32pm - 5710 days | #48 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Yeah, too many people never make the connection between monetary cost versus the results of these various vice wars. "Let's get tough on crime" is never followed by a chart showing incarceration, law enforcement and prosecution costs. I find it amusing that state's are finally catching on that it's a hell of a lot cheaper to imprison someone for life rather than chase them with the death penalty for years in multiple court appeals. With tight times continuing I'm wondering how much longer that people figure out that our 7+million US inmates are costing us about $21 billion a year to house. The other big problem with the vice wars is that treatment never really becomes much of an option. Stuff is either illegal or legal. Nevermind that when it comes to vice, a lot of otherwise average people get caught up in it. What most of them need is the ability recognize and deal with their problem, not sit in a jail cell for years and then be unhireable afterwards because they're a convicted felon. A lot of studies tend to show that treatment trumps incarceration for long term effectiveness and cost. However, it's just easier to declare something with bad connotations is illegal than it is to try and convince the general public and politicians to find a more balanced approach. | |
|
||
| 05-04-09 05:00pm - 5710 days | #31 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:45am | |
|
||
| 05-01-09 12:45pm - 5713 days | #44 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
... and you guys thought I'd be willing to watch this thread die? NOT !!!! I mentioned above the Aussie government's great quest to establish a child porn blacklist that is so far failing miserably. As some of you Euro PU'ers know, several European countries already have some blacklists or block access to some porn sites with the emphasis stopping kiddie porn outlets. I came across a news article today that basically led me to further cement my notion that this is just a colossal waste of government money (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/techno...gy/01filter.html?hpw). The Iranians and Chinese are notorious for actively censoring their web networks. However, capitalists have figured out that this is a mass market ripe for the pickings. Apparently, there is quite an active market for software that lets users automatically avoid government firewalls. The principle is pretty easy in that you access a remote server (outside the censoring country) and that server rapidly changes the IP address so the government computers can't keep up the tracking to determine if blocked sites are being reached. The faster government computers try and speed up detection, the faster the IP addresses change and the more cumbersom it becomes to trace back to the original user. I've known such systems exist but they are now cheap, easy to access, and has no special hardware or system requirements. Governments have to know this stuff exists. They also have to know that, especially in Western governments where the focus is preventing access to porn and not active censorship, any such program is basically fruitless except in stopping the stupid because they're not trying to shut users down in real time. In other words, government policies of blacklists and porn restrictions are nothing more than political granstanding with no measurable result. I know I'm preaching to the choir here but I guess I'm wondering why lie to the public and tell them your accomplishing something when all you're doing is flushing $$ down a beaureacratic toilet. Continuing to censor the web also creates bigger problems. Internet security is starting to become a bigger concern given the worlds reliance on networks to operate everything from nuclear weapons to power grids to financial markets. By driving even more people to use programs that hide what they're doing from watching eyes all that does is make the job of finding terrorists, child porn fiends, criminals and hackers even more difficult and expensive because theres so much more "hidden" data to sift through. The political groups that runs many of these web servers circumventing political censorship claim that for every dollar they spend promoting and developing their software, censoring countries have to spend hundreds of dollars to effectively combat them. As a result taxpayers spend even more on government to find the bad guys because we're tossing a bone to some political base. Censorship has its price and it's not just the loss of free expression. Edited on May 01, 2009, 12:50pm | |
|
||
| 05-01-09 12:19pm - 5714 days | #9 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:10pm | |
|
||
| 04-30-09 03:45pm - 5714 days | #19 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:45am | |
|
||
| 04-30-09 03:36pm - 5714 days | #17 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:45am | |
|
||
| 04-30-09 11:57am - 5715 days | #2 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 01:10pm | |
|
||
| 04-28-09 02:01pm - 5716 days | #24 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Two things to add here. First, I note that Internet Exploder 8 is now out. I switch between IE and Mozilla for browsers. IE 8 is now listed on my update schedule from Microcrap. Just wondering if anyone has had any negatives with version 8 so far. Second, I saw that Firefox 3.5 Beta 4 is available for test. One of the supposed features of that is a "porn" setting. OK, really, it's a privacy setting that supposedly has lots of features on it. The new Firefox is also supposed to be faster than the 3.0 version. Again, just wondering if anyone has taken a gander at this one. | |
|
||
| 04-28-09 12:54pm - 5716 days | #6 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:44am | |
|
||
| 04-27-09 11:21am - 5718 days | #4 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Trademarks are a royal pain in the ass that primarly generate no resolution to anything other than legal bills. A trademark is a distinctive sign, phrase or other indicator that someone uses in association with a product. The product can be a business or a person. The whole deal with mutual of Omaha and Oprah is over hyped. Oprah would never be able to claim money from people using the phrase in everyday useage since it's been around so long. What she wants to do is grab the phrase so that other companies would have to pay her money to use it in their advertising for their products. In Exotics case, he found out what happens when you try and run a business built around an identity someone/thing else already has a claim to. For example, let's use Florida State as an example. FSU goes by the nickname the Seminoles and they've probably trademarked that nickname. They can't charge people for using the word Seminoles or for describing the actions of their sports teams. They can go after people though trying to make money off of the Seminoles name when that name is used in close association with their school. That's probably what Exotics ran into. Overall, trademarks (and intellectual property in all) is a very murky and gray world. It's not uncommon to see companies get overzealous defending their "turf" because legally they have to assert their trademark claims over others or else risk losing the trademark and associated income. As a result a lot of little people get squashed because they don't have the time and money to defend what they're doing against the legal goon squad. Usually, it's the lawyers who seem to convince companies that trademarks for useless phrases and the like carry a lot more weight than they do. If you really want to get pissed off at intellectual property types you should be aware that you don't own your own body. Under US law, companies can patent protect genes. In other words, the human genome has been around for a few hundred thousand years. Yet, a company can sequence a gene, patent it, and sit on it charging others a fee for the right to research that gene. So, if you have some obscure disease that someone working on a doctorate might want to investigate, they might not be able to because Mega-Corp owns that gene and doesn't want anyone playing with it without forking out the cash first. That's something to be cheesed about. | |
|
||
| 04-27-09 11:01am - 5718 days | #8 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
Iknoporn has also been working on an organization system, nicknamed th Porncommander (see here: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_thr...ad.html?threadid=385). He seems to have encountered problems though finishing up. I'd be interested to see what you have going. | |
|
||
| 04-23-09 01:01pm - 5721 days | #10 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:51am | |
|
||
| 04-22-09 05:31pm - 5722 days | #4 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 20, 2023, 11:51am | |
|
||
| 04-21-09 12:57pm - 5723 days | #2 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
I would have to say that "less is not more" when it comes to tours. If websites gave great and informative tours then there wouldn't be such a need for places like PU ;) Personally, I like full tours (see Vivthomas or Teendreams) where you can see all the sets and vids available, you just can't download the vids or see the all the thumbnails in the set. That way, you know what you're getting and there's no risk of being mislead (not that you would do anythign like that) like some sites where the girls featured in the tour never appear on the site. Obviously, your site is smaller than the examples I gave. Lest you start feeling "size envy" I would say that your tour should at least have the model directory available (if you don't have one, create one I'd say) with the number of sets / scenes available. Thus, you could probably get away with a several page tour. I'm always a bit worried when I only see a one page tour since that really doesn't provide any info for the customer. I can't recall ever seeing a one pager and saying to myself "Wow, this seems like a cool site". So, I would say that you need to expand on your "less is more" philosophy. And while we're talking philosophy I'll bastardize the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (rubbing more salt into those Scottish wounds) and say that I like my tours "Nasty, Brutish and Long". Edited on Apr 21, 2009, 01:03pm | |
|
||
| 04-20-09 10:57am - 5725 days | #5 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
I use the free and basic "IE Privacy Keeper" program. I have it set up so that everytime I close out my web pages it nukes my temp files, browsing history, typed urls, mru menu, cookies and the download folders file. For me, it does seem to eliminate the autocomplete history but then again I mostly use IE Exploder for surfing. It's certainly not bullet proof but should the average user get on my machine they're going to have to dig to find traces of my porn surfing history. | |
|
||
| 04-20-09 10:47am - 5725 days | #16 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
I review most sites with a caveat. First, like others, I don't review all the sites in a network. Second, some I join that already have large numbers of reviews and comments don't get reviewed either. On the other hand, if a network is really bad I might do reviews on more than one site just to serve as a warning to others who might be interested in a particular site. I probably review about 80% of the sites I join. | |
|
||
| 04-17-09 01:34pm - 5727 days | #2 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
If it were me, I'd simply focus on buying the best I could afford. With that in mind, I'd focus mostly on the processor; the most expensive item to upgrade. Hard drives aren't that importent since they're getting cheaper and are easy to upgrade, plus you can attach externals, assuming you already don't have one or more. Thus, I'd focus on getting processing speed (quad core probably). Otherwise, the rest is up to you. If you like games and movies then you'll need a good graphics package. If not, that allows more money for a better processor. As for download speeds, I don't know that much about them other than it might be your provider that's causing the slower speeds. Depending on where you are on the "chain" of subscribers, you can't sometimes can't get fast downloads because there are a lot of other cable or DSL subscribers hogging bandwidth ahead of you. Your computer's processor doesn't have much to do with download speeds unless your using an old machine/processor or your sucking up much larger bandwidths than what you currently have. Sometimes, its just your bandwidth provider. They advertise "speeds up to ..." meaning that you rarely see top end download speed. Some of the PUer's with a better tech background might have more insight on this one. Edited on Apr 17, 2009, 01:38pm | |
|
||
| 04-16-09 11:39am - 5729 days | #12 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
... and then we have this guy who is a shining example of how webmasters shouldn't behave here (cue the theme song of "Spamalot"). | |
|
||
| 651-700 of 1139 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 13 | Page 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 22 | 23 | Next Page > |
|
