Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Monahan (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (348)  |   Threads Started (12)

101-150 of 352 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 Page 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Page >

11-25-10  11:37am - 5140 days #3
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Denner:


We do not have Thanksgiving in Europe - for real, anyway - But what's important to other fellow PU in the US and Canada, I guess - is important to us, too:
So, thanks to TBP and PUs:
A happy thanksgiving - and watch out for the booze....LOL.



Canada celebrated its Thanksgiving in October.

A wag on the radio today said that France celebrates "You're Welcome Day."

11-24-10  09:49pm - 5141 days #20
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
My approach is rather rudimentary.

I start with the model name then create sub directories for each babe by the site name. If there are two or more babes in a video, I post it in each babe's folder.

I tag the file name with HD and @@ where appropriate. (@@ means top notch boobs and is a good way to help a search.

11-24-10  09:37pm - 5141 days #3
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


We're going to allow you a little latitude here but be aware, once you have a site we'll have to switch your account to a webmaster acct.

BTW, you'd be well served to spend some time browsing back threads and past poll questions. There are a ton of suggestions there.

100% agree.

It would be useful for JB Heart to not only read through the forum, but also to comment on/ask questions about the suggestions already discussed in detail.

We PU members have a lot of ideas, issues, etc. that JB can learn from and generally seem to be the sort that would love to respond to specific new ideas.

11-21-10  06:49pm - 5144 days #5
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


What, you think Satan wants to mess with your dirty junk. I hear that the TSA is getting into the ball cleaning business, try them instead.


My momma taught me to wear clean underwear with no holes. She was worried what people would think if I had a serious accident.

If she were alive today, she'd probably want me to scrub my balls before flying so the TSA agent would think kind thoughts as he fondles my junk.

This discussion has me wondering. Could a pornstar find work teabagging the guys who opt out of the full body scan? After all it's to protect us from terrorists, isn't it?

11-20-10  10:57am - 5145 days #26
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I was chatting with two mid-20's girls in my office yesterday about tats in general. They are attractive and both said they don't see why anyone would do a big tat on any part of their body. They are OK with a small, discrete tat on, say, the neck or wrist, and a reasonably sized "tramp stamp" on the back but not the huge tattoos that cover an arm or such.

They said that tat's are not really that cool any more in their circles and that if they would want a tattoo they would use the stick ons and not go the full needle route.

I'm really hoping that's the case and that future models abstain from tat's.

11-15-10  09:14am - 5151 days #44
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Click here: The Internet Movie Database (IMDb)

11-15-10  12:21am - 5151 days #11
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's what I found. It matches what I am getting but I do not know if it is the same for everyone.

The bolded sites are what I joined to get access to, and they are quite good. I'm in month 2 and have not checked any of the sites that were added this month. I will do that when I've finished checking out the primary sites.

1st month:
assholefever.com
blueangellive.com
bootyfullbabes.com
brothasfuckteens.com
bustyfever.com
clubsandy.com
deepthroatfrenzy.com
dirtymilfclub.com
dirtyorientals.com
doitbiatch.com
dominatedgirls.com
footsiebabes.com
intermixedsluts.com
juicybutthoneys.com
lezcuties.com
lustforanal.com
lustybustychix.com
oralquickies.com
perfectladyboys.com
pixandvideo.com
sexcityasia.com
sweetsophiemoone.com
teachmefisting.com
teenbitchclub.com
zoliboy.com

2nd month:
analteenangels.com
cummingmatures.com
dpfanatics.com
enslavedgals.com
grandpasfuckteens.com
hotmilfclub.com
lustygrandmas.com
mandyiskinky.com
mightymistress.com
squirtingfiles.com

3rd month:
alettaoceanempire.com
cheatingwhorewives.com
cutiesgalore.com
dpoverload.com
gapeland.com
mightyrods.com
myhornyasians.com
nudefightclub.com
oldyounglesbianlove.com
onlyswallows.com
sexwithkathianobili.com Edited on Nov 15, 2010, 12:26am

11-14-10  06:47pm - 5151 days #7
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I, too, have wanted sources to download some really old material by my faves like Rebecca Bardeaux and Nancy Suiter but the few clips that can be downloaded are really lousy resolution. Edited on Nov 15, 2010, 09:15am

11-14-10  06:36pm - 5151 days #8
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I am in my second month and can only agree with Drooler. I got a different set of sites in month 2, but the main sites in which I have interest are Zoliboy, Pix & Video, Lusty Busty Chix and Club Sandy. Those four sites were in my first month and have so much excellent content that I really haven't checked out the other sites, or any of the 2nd month sites either.

My "portal" site is Zoliboy. I'm guessing the assortment of sites is either random or is based on the webmaster's idea of compatible sites.

I'm happy just with the pricing model and view the additional sites as icing on the cake.

Changing subjects, I, and other PU's, have had our challenges with the navigation on the 21Sextury sites but with enough experience I was able to get the hang of it.

I am a very satisfied member and expect to be renewing my membership to the site for quite a while.

By the way, I agree with your comment that joining a site should be a simple deal, but I'm guessing the guy who engineered the navigation had a hand in the complex signup process.

Try it. You'll like it. Edited on Nov 14, 2010, 06:41pm

11-13-10  11:54pm - 5152 days #40
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Does anybody know the name(s) or sites this model has appeared under? She is listed as a new model at Metart in a photoset posted today:

11.13.2010
PRESENTING NEW MODEL
ALENA J BY ANDRE LE FAVORI

She has a cute face, slender body, seems very sweet.

http://www.met-art.com/new.html

I know I've seen this same model many times for years, but I can't remember where. I seriously need a brain implant or to get my roto rooter man to clear out the clogs in my memory system.

Your link takes us to a whole bunch of models.

11-10-10  10:55pm - 5155 days #4
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


You should be a salesman, you are that smooth. "Sir, once you buy the car all that will be revealed. Please sign here."



Sounds a lot like Nancy Pelosi who said that once the health care bill was passed the details would be revealed.

11-09-10  09:56pm - 5156 days #35
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


But not to worry, the paranoid among us speculate that in the future, all people will receive a bar-code at birth. Won't it be easy for porn collectors then.



Actually it will make life easier if we can track models on websites by their barcodes and not by their names.

11-09-10  08:54am - 5157 days #5
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Don't forget to check out Goldfish's thread "What's in a name?" from earlier this year. It may have some answers for you, or then again it may not.


Thanks for the link. I just posted this to that thread:
.

Originally Posted by Monahan:

While I understand the point that Khan raises, that the webmaster may not know the name in the first place so he/she assigns a random name, that does not seem quite right.

After the Tracy Lords mess totally changed the legal aspects of porn in the 1980's, it was the responsibility of the purveyor of porn to establish with positive evidence that all models were over the age of 18. That remains the case today.

So how is it possible that the webmaster who is posting material of a very young looking babe willing to do so without first vetting the model thoroughly to avoid the serious legal consequences of promoting child pornography?

If the webmaster is relying on his source to do the vetting, the webmaster is taking one huge gamble; much like a girl taking the guy's word for it that he doesn't have AIDS.

I don't buy it that the webmaster doesn't know the model's real name or stage name. Rather I suspect the issue is, as stated by others, laziness or some other motive such as creating a notion of exclusiveness.

11-09-10  08:50am - 5157 days #30
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Late to the discussion. I just posted a new thread on this subject.

While I understand the point that Khan raises, that the webmaster may not know the name in the first place so he/she assigns a random name, that does not seem quite right.

After the Tracy Lords mess totally changed the legal aspects of porn in the 1980's, it was the responsibility of the purveyor of porn to establish with positive evidence that all models were over the age of 18. That remains the case today.

So how is it possible that the webmaster who is posting material of a very young looking babe willing to do so without first vetting the model thoroughly to avoid the serious legal consequences of promoting child pornography?

If the webmaster is relying on his source to do the vetting, the webmaster is taking one huge gamble; much like a girl taking the guy's word for it that he doesn't have AIDS.

I don't buy it that the webmaster doesn't know the model's real name or stage name. Rather I suspect the issue is, as stated by others, laziness or some other motive such as creating a notion of exclusiveness. Edited on Nov 09, 2010, 08:56am

11-08-10  08:58am - 5158 days Original Post - #1
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA


I've had a lingering question that maybe someone here can answer.

Most of the top models in porn have created "stage names" for themselves and those names are what we horndogs use to search for new content.

My problem is with those sites that use common single first names for ladies who have already created their reputation, which make them hard to locate.

Met Art and Young Busty are two sites that do that, but I am unable to understand why. It would seem to me that staying with the "official" name would be more advantageous than creating some alternative name.

Can anyone tell me what the thinking behind this is?

11-02-10  11:01pm - 5163 days #19
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by shooterbo:


If I try to playback newer videos that run over 3000K, my Windows Media Player 11 stutters and stammers and plays in slow motion, etc. I don't know why.
I suspect it's a video card problem. A standard video card may not be able to handle the heavy duty stuff.

10-31-10  09:42am - 5166 days #15
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by emagius:


Hi, I was about to create a new thread on the same topic so I figured I would post here with a few questions regarding prepaid cards.

I've been using my cousin's credit card to subscribe to adult paysites for the last two years. It has served me well until my cousin recently decided to cancel it due to high interest rates. Because of that, I had to look at prepaid cards as serious alternatives and after doing some research, I narrowed down to one particular card, NetSpend Visa Prepaid Card which is available at a gas station, close to where I live. Before I take the plunge with this card, however, I need to know whether this card is accepted by some payment processors (see the list below) and I say this because some processors (Verotel for example) do not accept them, even the ones with VISA logo. I contacted the ones (except Verotel of course) in the list and only two (CCBill and DHD Media) responded, confirming that they do accept them. The other two, Epoch and Netbilling, have yet to respond to my query and If any of you had used Epoch or Netbilling that had no trouble processing your prepaid cards, I would appreciate it if you can confirm it.

Payment processors:

CCBIll - yes
Epoch - ???
DHD Media - yes
Verotel - no (see this link as evidence)
Netbilling - ???


I apologize for not responding to your specific question but that's because I have never tried using a prepaid card for porn sites.

But please see my post above.

This technique has worked very well for me and is a great way to track your activity. Just don't make the mistake I made a few months ago where I pulled out that low limit card to buy gas. It caused me to go over limit and I had to waste a lot of time restoring the account so it could handle the auto-renewals.

10-27-10  09:41am - 5170 days #15
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Ed, as a consumer I'm 100% with you.

While I like the quality of HD, I like the d/l speed and the lower sizes of 720 stuff, which are plenty good for me.

I consider 720 to be optimal for the reasons you stated and will only go for higher resolution stuff when technology improves such that the download speeds are reasonable and the storage media is either solid state or cheap enough that it's worth storing a 1.0+ Gb size file.

10-24-10  03:45pm - 5172 days #7
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


I quite agree with all the above....but particularly the part about the guy "shuttin' the fuck up." That alone speaks volumes.
I might add also that we can do without the male's peculier need to grab, squeeze, pinch and slapping the face, tits and cheeks of the woman's ass... What the hell is that all about?


Absolutely right.

The only voice(s) I want to hear in any porn scene is female and only if it's real, not that fake moanie groanie nonsense.

10-24-10  11:44am - 5172 days #7
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I'm different, I guess. I don't mind even 320 stuff if it's a babe I really like and who has retired or is not releasing new stuff.

What I've been doing recently is downloading the lower quality stuff so I can watch and see if a video is worth keeping. If it is, I'll consider downloading the HD version.

10-23-10  12:39pm - 5173 days #7
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Sorry guys, but I must be a pervert. My focus in porn is PTA*, not male body parts.

A sexy broad with gorgeous body parts is, or should be IMO, the point in pornography. The stunt cock is there to create the full magilla, to provide something to fill the cavities, not to whack one's noodle over.

I really don't give a rat's butt whether the dude is wearing a rubber or not. I care only about the director making sure the dude's hairy ass is not getting in the way of my seeing all parts of the babe and how she maximizes her sexuality by her moves.

*PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass.

10-21-10  08:25am - 5176 days #2
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I agree, but why not with an audience? That would be something new and different as well.

10-21-10  08:23am - 5176 days #19
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


...That was a time when the word "freeze-up" became a staple of my vocabulary.

Boy does that bring up memories. I tried Prodigy. Lousy content. Then AOL. Their inbound modems crashed. Then CS, and it froze more than Eskimo pee.

And no internet porn. Definitely not the "good ol' days!

10-20-10  11:40pm - 5176 days #14
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by ByteMaster:


yeah I mean as they are today, wrinkles, stretch marks, saggy boobs, baggy hairy pussies, zimmer frames, warts and all.

yummy.


That almost makes a lesbo scene with Madeline Albright and Helen Thomas sound like it's right up your alley.

10-19-10  09:22am - 5178 days #7
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Khan,

I really think you should reconsider. The evolution of porn from "The Immoral Mr. Teas" to the sophistication of the industry today would seem to be a reasonably good, broad based theme that would interest a wide range of people.

And from your unique position where you actually engage with us Porn Users and also with the web element, I, for one, would think you could really write a successful book on the subject.

10-19-10  09:16am - 5178 days #9
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by mistresskent:


Anyone seen this site..

Its about a Mistress, she's british, sexy, funny and petite..

lol.. any good?


Great post Ms. Kent!


10-13-10  11:53pm - 5183 days #53
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
The last HIV scare was weathered and the condoms were pretty much a thing of the past. The testing is far more thorough than suggested above so I suspect the dude either cheated to avoid detection or contracted HIV soon after his last test.

10-12-10  12:05am - 5185 days #4
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Anne Hathaway:



SOURCE

10-12-10  12:01am - 5185 days #20
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by mbaya:


I have never had any interest in these scenes. To me, it is a little bit too much. Leave the magic alone, after all I like to think of porn as fantasy.


Ditto that. As a video porn fan I signed up for Met Art because they advertised a bunch of video of many of their babes which I found to be girls I wanted to see in real motion.

But the vast majority of their videos are of photoshoots which are about as interesting as watching ketchup flowing out of a bottle. Sorry. Overstating. Watching ketchup flow is more interesting because it usually means there's a juicy burger at the end.

10-11-10  11:49pm - 5185 days #14
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


...The last external hard drive I bought was an Iomega model. That came with a bunch of extra software, that I tried using at first, and then stopped. There was anti-virus protection, automated backup, and some other stuff. The Iomega hard drive is still working fine, I just don't use the extra software that came with it...



I just bought a 2.0 Gb Iomega (7200 RPM) hard drive for $104.99. The store also had a 2.0 Gb Seagate for $99.99. My experience with Iomega has always been good but with Seagate I've had issues.

I always reformat any hard drive (NTFS) before I use them to get rid of all the unrequested and unneeded software.

So far the new hard drive is working well and fast. I've transferred about 750 Gb of stuff from some older 160 and 200 drives just to consolidate everything and to free up the smaller ones for specialized stashes.

Just one man's experience.

10-10-10  01:38pm - 5186 days #47
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


...I can't believe that some of these girls don't develop stomach or gastric problems from performing all those ATM scenes.

I'm thinking that there has to be medical advisers that address those issues somehow.

In any case, the producers have to find new and different extremes just to keep porn moving, I guess.

Now how about a chocolate milk enema?

10-10-10  08:22am - 5187 days #41
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


... my idea/visualization was that someone would be sucking or drinking or licking the milk or liquid that was coming out the other person's ass.

But then again, I suppose that the person expelling the milk could be spraying it onto a person, or on the bed or floor or whatever. ...


I've seen some milk enemas on a few sites but in every case the milk squirts out onto an impervious service and is never consumed by someone, as is often done in peeing movies.

10-09-10  08:42pm - 5187 days #39
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


Strangely enough it's a pretty harmless fetish where girls shoot a whitish liquid out of their Anus. I don't know if you'll see new scenes because this is one of the things that was used against John Stagliano in his obscenity case. I know I haven't seen a new one in a long time.


Ass Traffic (a site that went dormant about a year ago) has a bunch of milk enemas. Although I don't get it, I really have no problem with that particular fetish, but I think I'd blow lunch if I saw someone drink the expelled milk.

10-03-10  01:18pm - 5193 days #45
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by malikstarks:


I think I should clarify as a member at Scoreland, that they have not gone all streaming, at least not yet. Rather the quote in the original post was in regard to their newest big time model Valerie Irene, which they have chosen to allow streaming only vids. They still are putting out down-loadable vids, at least for now.

Any site that moves in a direction of letting streaming take over from download-able better do some careful market research first. I will, for sure, cancel memberships in any site that goes mostly, or exclusively, to streaming.

10-03-10  01:13pm - 5193 days #9
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


I don't think they're interested in women, Yariana -- at least not for now.
My having noticed the senior examiner's skin-tight space-suit, with no hint of a visible genitalia, I bluntly asked him if he had one. "No", he said, 'we don't reproduce like you earthlings, hence the reason why you and legions who will follow are going to give up some of their body-parts to help us obtain them." I don't have time to explain the complicated process, he said, 'but I will tell you we're absent the lust, libidinous passion, and orgasmic pleasure you earthling's enjoy."
"Why just us Web- perverts? I inquired, 'Hell, earth's full of other guys equipped just like us."
"But we think the Web-perverts are having more fun WITH that equipment..... need I say more?"


Sexist, chauvinistic PIGS!


10-03-10  10:18am - 5194 days #30
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
While it may not qualify as a fetish, I really dig what I call "pussy flossing":



Something about watching a babe "flossing" her pussy with panties or thongs just gets ol' Little Richard to morph into Big Dick.

09-26-10  08:25am - 5201 days #18
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


...Not to prejudge, but I doubt that adult novelties are illegal in your part of the country anyway, Monahan.

Not only are they totally legal here in El Lay, there are entire stores on the main streets devoted to adult toys and associated items with creative window displays.

I'm expecting TV ads and reality shows soon that feature dildoes and such.

09-25-10  10:52pm - 5201 days #15
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I get a jolt out of strange insertions like panty stuffing, pearl necklace stuffing (with a string left dangling from the snatch), fisting, bottles, beer cans, hammer handles, etc. Strangely baseball bats and fucking machines don't do anything for me at all.

I saw one scene on an old Fiona Cooper video where a gorgeous Brit lady humped a knobby bedpost that really got my pistons pumping fast.

AFAIC, each guy has his own thing and the best part about the proliferation of internet paysites is that virtually all perverse fetishes are accomodated,

09-25-10  10:44pm - 5201 days #5
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


This begs the question: What do you do about a gal who has everything and knows how to use it.... EXCEPT... she draws the line when it comes to giving head?
Now I can certainly live without blowjobs, per se.....

But when you have a girl with lips like Angelina Jolie.....Well, you gotta know where I'm comin' from.


As for BJ's and teabags I enjoy being the party of the second part...but when it comes to watching porn, I don't see the point of watching some dude getting serviced with the screen filled with his schlong while I am getting limp waiting to see some PTA*.

Yes, I know where you're "cumming" from when she won't give head.

*PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass.

09-25-10  05:42pm - 5201 days #86
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


Until you said that, I'd never even thought of advertising that as a feature. I will add a message to my sites imminently. None of my sites use DRM, but I didn't think of saying so.

Thanks for the suggestion!


Danni.com had DRM when I joined up. The teaser site bragged that, once downloaded, the video was yours to keep even after quitting the site.

The ambiguity made no sense because why use DRM if you can keep the download? So I wrote an email to their customer support staff. They said that if I download one of their videos onto my primary hard drive, the associated license is also downloaded. So I went with it, signed up, and downloaded a big bunch of stuff and transferred it all to DVD's and external drives.

They all played just fine...UNTIL...I canceled my membership. Immediately I had no access to any of my stash.

So I wrote again copying the original email. And again. And again.

Finally I decided to join again for a month to see if I could access my stash and to see if I could get a reply to my inquiry. Bam! Access returned and I got a very rapid reply. But it was a bit different. They said if I want to store video on an optical disk or an external hard drive, the license doesn't transfer with it. I could only access the downloads after canceling membership if I store the downloads on my computer's C drive. Period.

Being totally pissed off and being that I did not want to have even some of the stash on my C drive, I wrote back asking for a refund. I got one, but lost access to the stash again, except the two I left on my C drive to test the theory.

I don't know if Danni.com still uses DRM (TBP says they don't, but they said that back when I rejoined, so who really knows for sure), but if Danni.com think they'll get me back, they've got another think coming.

So, Ed2009, it is a BIG PLUS to promote no DRM, provided you really mean it.

09-25-10  07:45am - 5202 days #12
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
ProPorn, welcome. I've visited Helsinki several times and don't recall seeing much in the way of nude bars or the like, but I do recall seeing "adult" magazines at the Railway station.

But it's been at least 10 years since I was in Finland.

Just curious.

What is the current legal climate for porn in Finland?

09-24-10  09:33am - 5203 days #13
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I've always assumed that when a porn video goes right into naked sex with no tease, or goes from fully dressed to naked with no transition, is either very low budget and the cameraman screwed up the single shoot, or that the transition was screwed up with bloopers, or that the entire shoot was made and canned and was discovered later, then added as content.

I don't think any professional porn producer would do that intentionally.

09-21-10  09:10am - 5206 days #12
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Candidly after reading this thread and thinking about the subject, the bigger contributor to biased reviews, in my opinion, is the responsiveness of the webmaster to member communications.

If I get a real response from a real person who gives the impression he/she really cares about me and my opinion/experiences with his/her site, I will be much more likely to score the site a lot higher than if the usual occurs where I get no response at all.

09-17-10  11:24pm - 5209 days #9
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
While I like the idea of prepaid cards, they can be high maintenance. I tend to join sites intending to stick around for several months, Prepaid cards need to either be recharged or replaced or the renewals will be declined.

My approach, that has worked well for at least 5 years, is to use a card where I've established a very low credit limit ($80.00) and watch all activity on line. That card is used only for porn sites so if I deal with a biller who decides to play games, he'll bump into the limit very quickly.

09-12-10  08:35am - 5215 days #74
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by slutty:


...to blame and entire country's population for any misdeed is almost always misguided...
Perhaps it's time, then, for our news media such as Time Magazine to reconsider calling the USA "Islamophobic."

09-11-10  11:05pm - 5215 days #29
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Sorry to report from first hand sad experience that eating out a pussy that has some jewelry attached can, at a minimum, be unpleasantly distracting and worse, can cause pain for both the muncher and the munchee.

09-11-10  11:02pm - 5215 days #15
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Everyone in the porn world has been on Naughty America at least once, I believe - so it's as good a site to check out as any. They have made it increasingly difficult for non-members to do any kind of searching at the site, though.


True but they have pulled several of the older videos with the result that several of the girls are no longer on the site.

09-10-10  08:01am - 5217 days #8
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


These "whoisshe" threads are hilarious!


Some are great, some are useful, some are futile, but I always enjoy them.

09-07-10  11:34pm - 5219 days #10
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Drooler:


...I mean, just compare this (sweet, young, sensual flower) to this (a Russ Meyer supervixen).


This is one of the best examples of why gorgeous babes need to resist screwing up their natural beauty. One has to wonder what they were thinking.

DDF has 25 videos and photosets of this babe in her original body, some solo, some lesbo and some hc, all of which are in my hard drive stash in the fully erect department (apologies to Larry Flynt).

Twisty's has 5 photo sets and 4 videos, most of which are after her alterations.

A shame, in my opinion. Edited on Sep 07, 2010, 11:44pm

09-07-10  08:09am - 5220 days #2
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I would bet that the US models have any moles removed surgically. After all US models happily have breast enhancements and scar removal surgery all the time. Why not mole removal?

101-150 of 352 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 Page 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.