Bizarre Fetishes Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. All Wam (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I liked Slime Wave so much I decided to try All WAM (Wet And Messy). It's a unique niche I hadn't seen before.
Comes with the Tainster Network and the add-on content from Sinx.
The models are a lot like the models on all of the Tainster sites, very attractive, European, usually slim and they are believably turned on.
Could be a great find for those with clothing and wet clothing fetishes.
Scenes are titled like, "Fully Clothed Bath Buddies". This network as a whole is impressive with their different niches.
Close to 500 scenes, 2 have been added in the last 6 weeks.
Older scenes followed a Wet And Messy theme, but some were mud wrestling.
The site works very well. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are tens -- others, the models don't seem to be as into this as on other Tainster sites.
I haven't seen one scene with a man in it.
Video quality isn't consistent. "Older" scenes have HD and True HD, while some "newer" scenes only have Standard Definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked Slime Wave so much that I expected to like this one just as much. Some of the scenes I do, some of the scenes just get too messy. It gets to the point that you can't even see through the see through clothing.
Having been a member of Tainster in the past I still get the feeling they have removed older, less quality scenes. With nearly 500 scenes there isn't much to complain about.
On the majority of the scenes you can download 1080p, 720p and 480p. Some of the oldest scenes only have 480p and 360p options (there's not many of these).
All of the scenes have photos you can download.
One of my biggest complaints is there are no men in the scenes. It seems like a naked man or a clothed man getting wet and messy would add to the niche and add more depth to it. Most of the scenes are two women and those are the best ones on the site. It looks like two women just don't make as big of a mess as three or more. Once they have three or more it becomes hard to even tell which model is which.
The best way to describe these scenes is to say -- a woman in clothes, or panties, is going to either get water or pudding or milk or some kind of liquid poured on her. The women then rub the liquids in on each other from their head to their toes. You can look at the beginning outfits to tell which scenes are going to be best. The ones with white t-shirts or white pants or white blouses are going to be showing a lot of see-through parts.
This is the part of the review that will either sell you on the site or turn you away. There's not a lot of sex in it. There's not even a lot of nudity in it. If you are into women touching themselves over their clothes or being touched over their clothes this site does that a lot. There are parts where the women start groping each other after 15 minutes of no touching. It gives it a believable feeling of them becoming aroused.
I liked that part for the sake of it being different than what I'm used to seeing, but if you require nudity then you might not like this site as well as their other sites. There were a few where I wanted the women to get naked, but they didn't.
I think that's a situation where you have a site sticking to their niche too well. The whole focus here is getting the women wet and messy.
I did notice the differences in download quality as well. One of the first scenes they have listed doesn't have HD or True HD option. Four pages in, every video has HD and True HD.
It's a good site in a niche I didn't even know existed. Some of the erotic parts with the touching over clothes are very sexy, but most of the scenes drop off too much from the no nudity and no sex.
It's worth checking out if you are a member on Tainster, but I wouldn't recommend it as a standalone site. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Gyno X (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
About the best Medical Fetish site I’ve found.
Script sticks to a serious, detailed medical exam until about half way, when sexual abuse slips in.
Ladies are comprehensively examined in close-up, well-lit detail. Deeply probed with gloved fingers etc.
Forum for interaction.
282 movies at last count, 45mins of decent quality at 1.2Gb, 4000kbps. |
| Cons: |
Very formulaic, script never varies. Models rather too compliant.
Mostly younger, slimmer models. Other body shapes/ages are available.
No penetrative sex, more an observation/heads-up to potential subscribers than a negative.
Not cheap, $35.95 a month.
Some older lower quality archive content can be bought separately but isn’t worthwhile; stick to the main site.
Czech dialogue but with subtitles. |
| Bottom Line: |
Medical Fetish sites tend to be fairly ridiculous, with comedy Nurse outfits and sex that starts within about a minute of the Doctor meeting the all-too-willing patient. So, Gyno Clinic is a welcome change, with a slow steady erotic build whilst the patient plays a pretty serious part.
A brief chat with the medic (mostly the ageing Dr Fungus, sometimes a female stand-in) leads fairly quickly to undressing and a variety of medical checks. Expect blood pressure, reflexes, weight, ultrasound pulse, temperature, breast exam (lingering a little of course), some exercises. Then she lies on a table, where more detailed examination begins. Eventually this of course becomes gynaecological & anal, with gloved fingers inserted and ‘clitoral reactions’ tested whereupon the model starts to lose their impressively maintained cool. An enema may be administered too, and maybe some urine taken. Insertions to measure vaginal depth may be made.
Next, off to the Gyno chair proper. Expect vaginal douches, speculum cervix exam, and gradually the introduction of a vibrator whilst some spurious medical response is measured until orgasm. The patient then gets dressed again and leaves. The scene never descends into conventional sex; it’s all one-way from doctor or else masturbation.
The price is not low, and I can’t help but think that Gyno Clinic’s continued success despite this reflects partly two separate special interest groups: Firstly, those healthcare professionals for whom a medical exam leading into an abuse/sexual situation is a fantasy they must daily supress but can vent via this website; Secondly, a more general voyeuristic interest, where sexual pleasure is obtained from ladies who are not (initially at least) aware of or obtaining the same. In an age where porn sites struggle to differentiate themselves, this must surely be congratulated.
Overall, I have to praise the deadpan portrayal of a medical abuse fantasy here, this site clearly separates itself from the rest. If it could vary the script/situation a little, e.g. the use of other authority situations to enact the simliar examinations, and perhaps have the models show a little reluctance/horror/embarrassment, and maybe widen the age & body type examined, it would be even better. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Cuckold Me Now (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I rarely can't find anything positive to say about a site, but this site was really so bad it doesn't have any pros |
| Cons: |
Video quality is not quality at all. The average wmv file size at this site is around 20mb or less with many falling around 6mb. Even a large file I downloaded (83mb) was still in a 720x480 frame, was not HD, and it still looked like the picture was getting stretched when you maximized the video window. The smaller files are clearly designed for an old school site and to be played in a very small window (320x240).
The design of the site really looks outdated. I have talked in the past about sites that hearken back to the nineties. In this case, if I didn't know better, I would say the site was designed somewhere around 1979. It actually reminds me of an old Adam and Eve catalog from the 1970s. Basically a page which a bunch of thumbnails, no titles or descriptions for videos, and you don't even get any clue as to the size and quality until you open the page that has the video on it.
Absolutely no search capability or indexing whatsoever.
I have run out of room to keep complaining |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is probably the biggest ripoff I have ever personally encountered. I went for it basically because they also included a membership to Romanvideoarchives.com. That turned out be an even worse selling point.
Basically I think a lot of these videos actually do date back to the late seventies or eighties. At least they look like they do. The quality is sub-par, even by 1970s standards. There are times when you can tell they just put the camera there, hit record, and that's the only shot your going to see the whole time, even when the actors move out of frame. It really is pretty bad quality just at the most basic, point-and-shoot level.
This site doesn't seem to be updating, though they claim they are. If they are they are only updating with old videos from the archive, because I have yet to see anything that looks like it was even shot within the last five years. Even webcams have better video quality now than what they were using.
The bottom line here is that if you waste a single cent on this site you're getting burned. I am trying to post this ASAP in the hopes I can prevent some of you from making the same mistake I did. If you are looking for cuckold videos there are far better sites like Cuckoldcream that will cost you about the same amount. They have clearly designed this site for low bandwith users, and file size (and quality) designed for streaming or downloading through a 56k modem (remember those days). I guess if you're feeling nostalgic for a five or ten min video that has been broken down into 2min videos meant to be played in about a four inch window, then this is the site for you. Otherwise, I would avoid this site like the plague.
P.S. Don't let the "tour" or "start page" windows fool you. The page shown above (or for this site here) is not the actual "members" page. Once you click "members" it takes you to the page from the 1970s. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
