| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1251
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Exactly so.
I do love the tease.
...But!
It is the lack of pay-off that gets me.
Cap'n :0/
|
11-23-10 03:06pm
|
Comment
1252
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
|
11-23-10 01:25pm
Replies (16)
|
Reply
1253
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well, as I understand it, new photographers & models are coming online.
It is slowly filtering through at the moment.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-23-10 01:19pm
|
Reply
1254
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gregdd's Comment
I am a photo freak.
When I was a member a few months back, I found there was a great degree of artsy 'sameness' about the thumbnails for the galleries, so it was difficult to pick up on sets which appealed.
Do you think there has been a recent improvement in the photography side too?
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-23-10 09:23am
|
Reply
1255
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Comment
Yes, it is the old conundrum of not being able to please all the folk all the time.
What floats one persons boat is a real turn off to another.
I do think things are improving, but it is a slow process.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-23-10 09:18am
|
Reply
1256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
It would be a distraction, so best avoided.
Cap'n. ;0)
|
11-23-10 09:03am
|
Reply
1257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Flashpeak Slimbrowser.
Been using various iterations of it since I first went online in the mid nineties.
Cap'n :0)
|
11-21-10 02:28pm
|
Comment
1258
|
VR Stage
(0)
|
|
11-19-10 05:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I would make her aware that it made me uncomfortable.
If she persisted I would leave.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-19-10 01:24pm
|
Reply
1260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Head & pubes only for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-15-10 09:01am
|
Reply
1261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I only have it in digital form. ;0)
|
11-13-10 02:02am
|
Reply
1262
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
NIGE2239's Comment
Welcome to PU.
Thanks for flagging up your problems here.
A very rational, & useful comment.
All the better for showing a commendable level of restraint.
It is good for potential customers to get info on customer service levels before deciding to join a site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-10-10 09:44am
|
Reply
1263
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Reply
Some AV / Security software can be paranoid & flag up false positives.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-10-10 09:10am
|
Reply
1264
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Reply
Well, I was a little surprised at the initial post.
I have always found Karups one of the best in terms of customer care.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-09-10 11:28pm
|
Reply
1265
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the support!
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-09-10 03:24pm
|
Reply
1266
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Reply
Well at least they are being responsive & responsible by quickly investigating your concerns.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-09-10 09:05am
|
Reply
1267
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
If that is the attitude of the Webmanager, take your business elsewhere.
I can't understand why after all the negative publicity CCBill persist in offering this unfair service.
As a result of this I am boycotting the use of CCBill where there is an alternative.
Cap'n. :0 E
|
11-09-10 08:55am
|
Reply
1268
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Secretease com's Reply
Mitch said:
" If explicit nudity is classed as 'open leg' upward, then over half
of the sets are explicit and the site will be continue this. "
For me softcore full frontal nudity means:
No clothing, No hands groping spoiling the view, no toys, no gynacology.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-07-10 01:13pm
|
Reply
1269
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
You are pretty much confirming my thoughts & expectations of this site.
Useful to have that extra info about the download limit though, thanks.
I like the format of the site but do not get along with the overtly glam models & outfits.
For me there has to be progression from fully clothed to softcore full frontal nudity.
I'll pass for now, but watch for any changes in content.
Thanks again for the useful review.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-07-10 11:10am
|
Reply
1270
|
VR Stage
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I have received the following error message on the email delivery:
Returned mail: Recipient address rejected: Mail appeared to be SPAM or forged. Ask your Mail/DNS-Administrator to correct HELO and DNS MX settings or to get removed from DNSBLs; MTA helo: manxnetsf02.manx
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-04-10 12:32am
|
Reply
1271
|
VR Stage
(0)
|
Reply of
VR Virtual Real's Reply
Well, I have not had the email bounced back, this time.
I have looked at the revised pricing details & it is not what I am getting when I click on the link to CCBill.
You state $19.90 per month.
CCBill are quoting me £15.21 which my currency converter equates to $24.32.
I appreciate exchange rates are variable, but that is up by about 25% !
Is there regional pricing going on here?
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-03-10 11:00am
|
Reply
1272
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I am a bit ambivalent to arm pit hair & am with you on the leg hair issue.
Other than the head the only other area I really like to see hair is the pubes.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-03-10 10:21am
|
Reply
1273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
A few more, but not that many, as few cater to my tastes.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-03-10 10:14am
|
Reply
1274
|
VR Stage
(0)
|
Reply of
VR Virtual Real's Reply
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
That was the email address I used.
I think it may have been that your server didn't recognise my server as a valid domain.
I will try resending my email & I will post any error message I get here.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-03-10 10:08am
|
Reply
1275
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
You will not find a more helpful & capable Webmanager either!
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-02-10 02:16pm
|
