| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Plenty of content
- High-bitrate, large videos
- Great quality images
- Beautiful, skinny European models
- Good site design |
| Cons: |
- Redundant after watching the first few (mechanical)
- Not amateur in nature
- Bit expensive |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall a good site site for lesbian sex. The video quality is excellent (along with the images). It features all girls (Sapphic literally means lesbianism). The girls are the typical gorgeous, skinny models with breast size going from A to D. The design is good with a lot of search features. The reason I left is that the content seems the same for most. Girls lick, toy, touch, prod, etc. but it seems almost mechanical after watching a few. Not amateur by a long shot. The site is a tad expensive also. I recommend it if you have a European model fetish (does it exist?) or you just absolutely LOVE lesbian video (amateur or not). |
|
05-05-07 09:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
Sexy Settings
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Regular Updates (~2/week)
Pro-amateur to amateur European models
Model Index |
| Cons: |
No categorization
No search
Sex (see detailed review below...)
MOV
Older videos are cycled out with new updates |
| Bottom Line: |
I wanted to like this site, I definitely like massage videos and there definitely seems to be a lack of sufficiently good videos in that genre. Unfortunately this site disappointed on a few points. First, it is supposed to be a "bondage" site, but not sure I would call this even light bondage. Videos sometimes show them being tied but many are just tied to begin with and with little to no respect for the bondage. They are typically tied with light rope or even a sheet that I guess they could probably struggle out of easily. They never struggle against it, it's just a forgotten element of much of the content. Previous updates last year used to claim high quality and I believe some claimed high definition, but it is not HD. ~840 x 480 for most and here is the worst part... MOV format. I have had so much trouble just keeping the players from crashing it is not even funny. Although the models seem to really orgasm in the massage/manhandle videos, the sex videos are rather disappointing. It is just the guy who started the site having sex with the models but they don't seem to enjoy it much and are typically much shorter than other videos (hint, hint). I suppose the only major thing that is going for this site is the manhandle/massage content and the somewhat amateurish appeal. No search, no categorization (beyond use of your browser's search function). I still have about half-year on my subscription (I like longer non-recurring subs), but I don't visit often. If videos were in a more playable format and HD resolution it would have bumped the score up a bit. Not the worst site out there but definitely not the best. |
|
01-18-10 09:51am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
128
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
marquis58401's Comment
I have heard that too, but I am pretty sure it is a rumor... and not true. I have seen the site in the past, and the tour on her front page still seems to add new content here and there. I will keep track on this for a while to see if it is still true.
|
05-05-07 09:31am
|
Reply
129
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Even though it doesn't appeal to me, it is a right for someone to make a company that produces and sells this content as long as the models willingly do it. If it isn't willingly the producer will still taste cold steel. Just as with most companies today, the people's views are not a meaningful as long as it isn't unlawful. I agree with this also. Society's personal opinions should not stand in the way of a person's right to conduct lawful business. Remember, there is still quite a bit of content that is still unlawful to produce.
|
12-11-07 06:17am
|
Reply
130
|
Teens Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I really hope that Galitsin gets out. I think he just got caught up by a system that had, for a long time, failed. Then he gets in trouble once at the worst time. I heard that at that exact time the Russian govnmt was seriously cracking down on companies that supplied pornographic material and that some legit companies got caught up too. Personally, I hope that if he does get out he reopens his site. I would also hope that he brings back Katia, my favorite of the his site's models.
|
11-08-07 05:22pm
|
Reply
131
|
Warm Kiss
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Yes, the content is very important. But a decent site is as well. For instance I like to keep up-to-date with sites that I dont even have a membership too. I like XML/ATOM feeds and mailing lists so I can keep up with whats going one, and make sure that if I join the site again I know there are updates.
|
03-02-10 12:34pm
|
Reply
132
|
Warm Kiss
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Interesting question. I will have to email them and find out. As far as the content, no there is no snowballing. Mostly creampie, a few lesbian and facial.
|
03-02-10 12:33pm
|
Review
133
|
Warm Kiss
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent Super-HD quality videos (SD and HD MPEG and lower-res WMV formats)
Content is very amateur / pro-am
Exclusive content
Many exclusive / semi-exclusive models |
| Cons: |
Site is TOO amateurish in design.
BMP format preview, logo, and background images
~2 updates per month
No search
No model index
No real still images beyond some screen captures |
| Bottom Line: |
The real ONLY reason this site got such a high rating is the content alone. The content is excellent. The site is primarily a video-only site. There are sets of pictures from some of the videos, but do not look like pro-photos. The photos all appear to be screen-captures from the videos themselves (no still camera involved or was integrated into the video camera). Many videos feature unknown or little-known models (with a few known porn models thrown in). Sadly the site only gets ~2 updates per month (some months may only get 1)... so this site could seriously use more frequent updates. The site design, and quite simply is setup could be MUCH better. I had actually emailed the owner (Ryan, one of the male models as well). He appears to be the sole person running the site from what I can tell and told me he is not very knowledgeable about creating sites. He did give my an in-depth explanation on why most the videos are MPEG instead of the more popular H.264, DivX, or WMV (the lower-quality videos are in WMV). The images on the page typically take 2+ minutes to download on a broadband connection and are in Bitmap (BMP) format. I did suggested to him to use JPEG images that are lower file size and download faster since much of the text is white and the background remains white as well until ~2 minutes later when the blue background image finally loads.
In conclusion, the content is GREAT but needs more updates than 2/month. The site needs a COMPLETE overhaul. At the very least needs images that will load faster and a better stylesheet/color selection. In terms of what the female models; most are very attractive, very amateurish with a few known porn models and unattractive models. There appears to only be two male models: Kyle, and Ryan (who also runs the site). Personally, I think they would be further ahead to hire a 3rd person to work soely on their site and focus themselves on getting more updates out the door... or selling to a company who has more resources to do so. |
|
02-27-10 01:05pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
134
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
Or the clitoris sort of like button
|
06-23-11 04:31pm
|
Reply
135
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
@Basileus
Where's the like button when you need it? :D
I just subscribed to the newsletter and the updates look pretty good!
|
06-22-11 09:57am
|
Reply
136
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That is my major beef with ATK, it is now 2010 and they only recently upgraded their video res... still less than DVD quality. Yes, they have a lot of content, but it really is time for an upgrade. More sites are starting to move to HD and I think that will soon become a standard for most sites.
|
02-12-10 11:48am
|
Reply
137
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Hm, thanks for the info and review. I had not seen this site yet. Looks much better than ATK and some models I noticed are/were models on ATK. Might be one to try...
|
02-11-10 03:11pm
|
