Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : jaypegged (0)  

Feedback:   All (3)  |   Reviews (1)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (2)

Other:   Replies Received (1)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Naughty And Fit

Naughty And Fit
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some very hot women on this site.
-Variety in "fitness type" from slim to muscular to voluputous.
-Variety in age and ethnicity
-Nice glamour-style posing, clothing and backdrop settings.
-Medium size collection.
-Simple but effective navigation.
-Zip files.
-Alphabetical listing of models.
-Lots of teasing-type posing
Cons: -Inconsistent picture quality due to large amount of old content (back to 1999).
-Full nudity rare in the higher quality content.
-Explicit nudity is only found in oldest lowest quality content.
-Video content not worth the trouble.
-Size and resolution of most content not up to 2009 standard. Most not even 2004 standard.
Bottom Line: This site is worth checking out if you want to see fit and muscular women in a mostly tame style similar to Playboy. I have not seen any of these models on other sites. It seems the material was assembled from different collections, where you have sets that are like Maxim (no nudity) to Playboy (partial nudity) and then a few full nude old sets in Penhouse style.

Its worth it just for this specific niche. There are very few sites that feature sexy muscular women. Otherwise, the substandard size and resolution of the pictures coupled with the lack of full nudity pretty much kills it.

I checked-ou a few of the videos, but they were not very interesting.

Download speed is fine because the file sizes are relatively small.

Worth it just to round-out my collection a little.

12-16-09  07:01pm

Replies (1)
Reply
2
Visit Karup's Older Women

Karup's Older Women
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

I would estimate that about 40% of the models have fake boobies. Not my cup of tea either, but they make up for it in other ways, and it is overall a good site. There are only a few models that are in the 50+ category.

11-13-09  05:47pm

Reply
3
Visit Club Seventeen

Club Seventeen
(0)
Reply of slutty's Review

After reading all the reviews I decided to join despite the less-than-enthusistic reviews. I have seen this site advertised more for more than 10 years and finally decided to check it out for the original content with no high expectations.

No, not worth it. Only a small percentage of the photosets have decent size and resolution. Everything else is small and grainy. I could not get any download managers to work so the pictures have to be saved one by one. The sets also have a small number of pictures, not that I would take the trouble to save them anyway.

Too bad. There are some very nice girls on the site, but the overall quality is outdated, and downloding pictures is a real chore.


11-13-09  05:32pm


Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.