Its more a yes and no. I would not use cost when scoring when judging a well established site with loads of content. However it needs to be brought up when a little junky solo site with hardly any content and bad quality is charging as much as one of the top sites. That is the only time the grade should be reduced.
Only 30 videos and they are basically all from her old web cams. The quality of the videos are bad! Its a shame to she didn't do more with her site, as she has huge boobs. She is similar to Rachel Aziani, but Rachel knows how to run a site. She doesnt really do
any videos anymore, like 3 a year. However she does still blog every 5 days. 96 pic sets, but they are very small sets. Occasionally does cam show, last one was December 10th. The site is pretty much dead.
Hey it turned out to be a good poll after all. I should of phrased the question better, I admit. But this poll led to an open discussion dealing with kids and porn; this is what i attended it to do when I made the question. Most kids nowadays are allowed full internet access and are bound to come across some porn while surfing. If you had a choice as a parent would you look the other way? Looking back I don't understand why I didn't put 18 plus or the I don't have kids choice. I'm actually quite surprised that alot of you despise porn at an early age. As porn viewers yourself, you actually mind that much if a kid were to come into contact with porn? I personally would not mind if I had a kid if he happen to view porn between 14-17, as i did myself. As kids we are all curious and I see no wrong in it personally. I remember when I was really young around 11 trying to access sites in which I could view naked woman, but I had blocked access. I would search for hours and hours trying to find a site I could sneak by and access. I sort of feel bad for some of todays teens who cant access porn sites because there parents have blocked access with parental control settings.
Also do any of you really see any fault in watching porn before your 18 on your own? It does not hurt anyone, you are simply viewing sexual activities which have been around since the beginning of time. You are watching naked people, big deal!
Also JD how are you going to land in prison for answering a poll question, and assuming more people on here don't even have kids. This was more directed to people who don't have kids. Did I ever say show, I said allow! this makes all the difference in the world. You must of not interpreted the question correctly. If you saw your kids watching it, would you just look away, or would you be in there face scolding them( and make sure they never come in contact with a porn movies until older then 18)
Maybe the 8 or less was a little over the top, but you never know.
Also there was no way my parents could of stopped me viewing porn when I wanted to. What would they do lock me in my bed?
Wow, I never realized this question would be so controversial. I'm sure most of you began looking at porn before the age of 18. There perhaps are parents who would'nt mind there kids watching porn under the age of 18. Its just a question, no ones getting arrested here. If you had a kid would you mind them watching it ? Im not saying to directly show porn to your kids at an early age, but if you discovered they were looking at porn on there own, would you allow it?
Its just a decision. Some parents scold there kids for wathcing R movies, some don't. Its just preference. No parents get in trouble for what there kid does on there own, its just illegal to give them porn. And yes i gaurentee you there are many parents who dont mind there kids wathing porn.
Porn promotes masturbation, masturbation promotes abstinence. Do you find fault of giving a playboy magazine to a young kid, I know plenty of parents who do not! For one of you saying no parents allow it is ignorant, there are many parents who smoke weed with there kids, which is illegal(same goes with porn). I dont have a kid as I'm only in college. But I started wathcing porn before 18, my parents might of seen me before watching a porn movie in my roon. It was my decision, not theres. Now they didn't condone it, but at the same time they did not go out of there way to search my computer and filter it of all porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very Sexy women
-all movies over 30 minutes
- come with whole bangbros network(huge amount of content)
- nice shots of cameltoes
- download as much as you want
- lots of fake tits
- good rating system for each scene or clip
- minute clips or big clips divided into 4 for non-dsl users. Offered in mpg or wmv
- very quick streaming times
- lots of pics per set
- most videos are good quality and done in POV
Cons:
-search engine is not so good
- to many pornstars, hardly any amateurs
- only 45 updates so far dating back since march 18, 2005
-pics lack quality( newest 800x500)( oldest around 600 x 450)
- on members page, site still claims to update every Friday, yet there has been no updates since late 2006.
- all facials no changing it up
- no zip download for pics
- can only download full scene in wmv
- like most sites the older videos are a not to good
Bottom Line:
-new jordans search which has sites top 12 models, every sexual position possible, and search by fetish( believe it or not, they have 156 listed). But this is more directed to the whole network. As far as this site you can only look up by model, or the date it was released.
-some of the pornstars include Sativa Rose, Amber Rayne ,Jessica Sweet, Veronica Sweet, Ginger Lee, Amber Peach and Veronica Stone. I could name tons more, the whole bangbros network is polluted with pornstars.
-All the girls begin the shoot wearing really tight shorts, really short shorts, pants, or tights/spandex. We see some close ups shots of it. The girl then takes off her pants or whatever shes wearing. Then the girl or guy takes the girls thong and makes a wedgie between her lips. These are some really nice shots of the lips. The girls create some good separation between the lips as the thong is pulled really hard between. After that its pretty much straightforward sex.
-Check out Monique's video as it seems the most realistic. She orgasms a few times in her video, and gets the guys condom covered dick milky wet from her pussy.
Overall, A decent site which had a lot of potential to be really good. However there are no more updates. It comes with bangbros a great reality avs, secondary to realitykings. If you are a cameltoe enthusiast, there is no reason not to join. The membership is fairly decently priced with all that’s included. enjoy
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Loads of pic sets of various teens(18-19)
-over 10000 pics
-extra content of pics from other sites( 17 pages)
- most pics around 1200 x 800 and are nice
-teens are hot for most part
-updates dailty
- videos are good quality
-fairly new site, so it will only continue to grow
- see future updates a month in advance
Cons:
- only full scene download for newer videos
- no full scene for some of older videos
- wmv downlaod only
- older videos and pics lack a little in quality
- no hardcore whatsoever, almost to soft softcore
- only 37 models on netowrk
- website seems smaller then it really is
- design and navigation is week
- crappy forum
-claims to have 446 videos, but i counted less then 200!! a true con
Bottom Line:
-58 videos of allashlee, 150 pic sets. She has the most going on in her videos then any other girl. She atleast masturbates to orgasm in several videos, and has a pee video. She has a few light lesbian videos.
Most scenes are full downlaod only. Pretty cute blonde girl.
- 702 daisy only has 8 softcore videos with no masturbation. Shes very sexy. Luckily there are over 200 pic sets of her.
- 9 videos for jenna at home. Mostly teasing
-10 videos for joy. only a few masturbation.
- Naomi model only 8 videos. To bad because shes the hottest of the girls, and has the best tits. She doesn't even masturbate.
-62 videos for for peaches18. Very cute small titted girl. Mostly teasing, a few masturbation.
-19 extra videos on top of that, and that about wraps it up with this whole network
-Not a bad network for teens, but its only for people who can deal with softcore content. Its hard not to see these girls not partake in any hardcore scenes. The videos are to soft core for my taste. There are not as many videos on this network as you think, so if you like videos this is not for you. If your a pic person, you will get your moneys worth. But the pics are not a very high resolution, so you may want to pass.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-55 pages of porn dating back since july 28, 2001
-update once a week
-well over 350 scenes
-usually over 200 pics per scene
-good orgasms
-quite a few erotic scenes on here that would be sure to turn anyone on.
- lots of vibrators and dildos
-download as much as you want
-wmv, real, or ipod download
-can download all clips in zip folder
Cons:
-no full scene download
-old videos have way over 20 clips and are like a minute
-newer videos have around 6 clips
- to many fake tits/pornstars
-you can stream videos, but they are slow
-pics are not that good, low pxl
-older videos are very poor, almost not even watchable
-a lot of the models are not that attractive
Bottom Line:
-clothespins, spanking ass, hogtied, forced orgasms, Face/titty slapping, nipple torture, caning, strap ons, latex. hotwax, suspension, footworship, clamps, etc…… are all part of the site.
-Id rate this sites light to moderate as far as bdsm is concerned as I’ve seen sites with have alot more torture. There is no needle play, or extreme pain being seen on these scenes. You don’t see any bruises or cuts after any of the spanking. Some models allow more pain then others.
The newer video tend to get away from the whole whipping ass theme though. The older videos tend to have more ass whipping which causes red ass. Now a lot of the video don’t even contain it.
-There are also quite a few squirters on the this site.
-lots of seen before models such as sasha gray, venus, harmony, Dragon Lily, Sandra Romain, sasha sparks, Penny Flame, and Eva Angelina.
-Not one of kinks better sites, atleast in my opinion. However that’s still not a major downfall as kinks has some of the best bdsm sites on the entire net. You really have to experience all there sites, and this is a good starting point. A little pricy at around 30 dollars, but you will have enough content to last you a while.
I put mixed, there seems to be more great sites and poor sites then ever right now. Lots of these poor sites are just in it to make a few bucks, not really having the site as the persons profession but rather something on the side. Lots of these better sites like ftvgirls, 1byday, realitykings are truly in a business for life and continue to improve usually yearly if not monthly.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
