| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Weird, especially considering my internet connection is only physically capable of (ideally) 65 GB in 24 hours.
I wonder if they don't allow download managers and that's what triggered it?
|
07-28-16 03:52pm
|
Reply
77
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
clark kent's Review
Wow. 100%.
Better than Met Art.
Better than DDF.
Better than Sapphic Erotica, Team Skeet, MC Nudes, Karups, W4B, TLE, Naughty America, Brazzers, and every other site listed here.
How very impressive. Must be one hell of an absolutely perfect site.
|
07-25-16 12:51pm
|
Review
78
|
DogFart
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Large site with lots of content
- Average to attractive women being seen to by black men with large penises
- .zip files of photos for every set I looked at.
- Epoch is payment processor.
- Simple site with simple navigation. Other sites could learn from this layout.
- Reasonable video sizes with good quality
- Deeply discounted rate was offered after canceling. |
| Cons: |
- 10GB/day or so download limit.
- A bit too heavy on the "they're all thugs playing dice in the alley" black guy stereotypes, but I guess that's part of the fantasy. FWIW, it would be nice to see some (legal) businessman scenes incorporated, too.
- Lots of fake tits and thigh tattoos, although I recognize that's the direction the industry has moved towards.
- Scene tags don't help much. "Hairy" is anything from a full belly-to-bottom bush, or just a little landing strip. And sometimes it produced scenes where the actress was fully shaved and bald as an egg. Or maybe it's the guy in the video. Hard to know for sure. |
| Bottom Line: |
Good site with good content.
Attractive women servicing BBCs, and different scenarios / fantasies spread over a number of sites on the network. MILFs, cuckolds, black on white, white on black, individual actress sites (Ruth Blackwell, Spring Thomas, others), etc. It's one of the biggest, if not THE biggest, players in the niche, and it has years of content available using lots of big name actresses as well as unknowns.
Quite a few of the "big" downloads failed before they finished, and links/pages don't stay alive more than 30 minutes to an hour, so download managers don't work too far beyond the most basic "download this single file and nothing else after it" functionality.
I ran into a weekly download limit (somewhere around 10GB/day if I had to guess) that is not mentioned in the terms or on PU/TBP. You still have access after you go over, but you can only stream until their clock resets. I don't remember the reset time limit (sorry), but I'm guessing it's at the end of the week since the page telling me I couldn't download any more since I'd hit the limit specifically mentioned "week".
Bottom line: I liked it, but note that it's aimed towards non-collectors with fast connections who are interested in streaming the majority of the content and only want to keep a few items here and there.
Would I join again? Yes. |
|
07-23-16 12:39pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
79
|
Tainster
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Very reasonable PU discount
- Beautiful models in nice clothes
- Some videos offer HD
- Some videos offer pic .zips
- Search function works okay sometimes |
| Cons: |
- Search function often can't seem to find actresses
- Oh well, because a LOT of actresses aren't named anyway
- Ads, ads, and more ads.
- Site isn't very responsive. I suspect it has a lot to do with all the ads and the 10 chat boxes that load on the side of every page.
- Ridiculous outfit choices at times. Is a woman really going to continue to wear a fancy hat or constantly fuss with a long, slinky, bothersome purse on one arm during a half hour threesome in her own home? (Very minor con in light of all the rest, though)
- Videos are all named the same thing, so you'll end up with a pile of "540p_fullcomplete" files with no idea who or what is in any of them.
- Navigation is crap. It would often send me to the main updates page (for all sites) when trying to click to the next page of a specific site's content.
- .zip files often have errors in the included/unzipped .jpgs.
- Way, WAY too much focus on the wet-and-messy fetish. |
| Bottom Line: |
A lot of the scenes on the network share content. Example: Fully Clothed Sex and Fully Clothed Pissing scenes are exactly 100% the same with the addition (subtraction, technically, since those frames are edited out in the FCS side) of urine. I'm not into that, and it's irritating to watch a scene with beautiful women glammed up in very attractive outfits and one lady's blouse is suddenly completely soaked for no reason. Well, no reason in THAT video, since it's not the urine site, but yeah, you know the actual reason and it ruins the scene. They often try to cover it up by pouring water or wasting champagne on the models, but once you realize the scenes are shared it doesn't matter. If her clothes are wet in the FCS scenes, it's urine.
Shared scenes and overall video listings for models is not representative of actual content. Take Kate Gold as an example. She has 232 scenes listed (HELL YEAH!), but only about 30 aren't party-orgy scenes. There may be some good stuff in the party scenes, but it's more trouble than it's worth to slog through the photos to see if she's actually involved or only credited because she happened to pass in front of the camera. That means I, and I suspect others, are not going to bother with the party clips (I'm not wasting my time grabbing an 800mb file for 30 seconds of an actress no matter how much I enjoy watching her work- see Rady in the scene titled "720p_fullcomplete" (haha, get it?) for a great example). Of the 30 or so remaining scenes, around half are shared overall (see previous paragraph re:urine), so she only has a dozen or so unique and possibly desirable clips out of the 200+ listed.
Siddi? 32 scenes listed, 2 unique non-party scenes.
Sindy Vega? 17 scenes listed, 3 non-party scenes.
Sweet Cat? 149 scenes listed, a dozen or so non-party scenes.
Zoe Fox? 29 scenes, but only 1 non-party scene.
It goes on and on like that.
Ads and up-sells all over the place once you're inside. Checking the box that says "skip the portal the next time I log in" is apparently meaningless and does nothing to prevent the ads from appearing the next time you log on. When you cancel your subscription a banner appears at the top telling you that you've canceled your subscription and "Please Click here we got a special offer for you." Very irritating.
It looks like their sister site "Sindrive" (very easy to find if you just remember to look for the advertisements on every page) is where they're putting the good stuff these days, along with the 4K videos. FWIW, if it were me I would've given the party-orgy clips their own $10 site and made Tainster a cheap $5 hey-let's-get-what-we-can vessel for all the other sites they advertise for.
BUT
Even after all of that, the worst part of the site is probably that all the newer content has started to be forcibly blended together into the WAM (wet and messy) niche. Parties? Everyone has something poured onto them. Lesbians using a wand massager on one another? Oil. Pornstars ostensibly at home? Urine. Then there are all the actual WAM sites, which are around half the network already. It's a shame, because the site had so much potential. They obviously even had a brief period of time when they tinkered with straponcum.com style lesbian scenes using MILFS/glam, and even had mff threesomes using the same idea, but they stopped that approach and went for large fake rubber cocks spraying ridiculous amounts of lotion out of gloryholes (?) to get the WAM element.
Bottom line: If you like attractive, well-dressed European women getting urine or lotion on their clothes, and/or if you are looking for a place that offers lots of carefree women letting strangers pour any number of things onto their nice clothes (and that's VERY much a fantasy, btw) before suddenly having sex in a dance club while none of the other patrons care orgy fantasy videos, this site is probably worth checking out.
Would I join again? Unlikely. |
|
07-13-16 10:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Large "network", lots of content, and good variety
- Big name actresses and up and comers
- Multiple video encoding options
- HD videos
- Good PU discount
- Very large site
- Good site if you're a fan of blowjobs and POV |
| Cons: |
- Weird/huge encoding options on numerous videos (Immoral Live is the worst)
- Now that I think about it, Immoral Live is the letdown overall
- Definite pornstar site. Lots of fake tits, tattoos, etc.
- "Network" could just as easily be offered as one large site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Mommy Blows Best and 1000 Blowjobs were the better sites on the network for my dollars. Only Teen Blowjobs is pretty good if you prefer college aged girls, and throated is for all of you who enjoy drooling, running-mascara, fake-eyelashes-stuck-to-cheek BJs. Sunlust was good if fairly by-the-numbers XXX, as were the remaining sites other than Immoral Live.
Immoral Live held the least appeal of the bunch to me. Imagine pornstars hired to X with no premise beyond achieving X while being filmed with prosumer home-video filming. Hey, there's Penelope Pornstar! We hired her to (spin the wheel) give a blowjob! Hey, there's Penelope now giving the blowjob, and she does while looking bored through the entire passionless too-huge video.
The encoding for the sites were pretty good, and the scenes were appropriately sized for the HD and non-HD choices. Except, again, for Immoral Live. There were often scenes that would be 1GB downloads on any other site on the same network that were 4 to 6 gigabyte downloads on Immoral Live, and they didn't look any better.
Bottom line: Large site with good oral content and only a few irritations here and there, and definitely worth a look at the PU rate if you're a fan of oral.
Would I join again? Yes. |
|
07-03-16 05:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
Reality Kings
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Huge site
- Lots of different niches in the network (MILFs, natural bush, lesbian, etc.)
- Good video quality overall, even with the non-HD .mp4 downloads.
- .zip files of pictures and screengrabs
- Lots of variety in body types, hair, and skin color.
- Some good unknown actresses |
| Cons: |
- Wow at the ads
- Quite a few of the good unknown actresses apparently only did one scene and then disappeared forever.
- Sometimes only .zip files of picture sets OR screengrabs, but not both
- Some sites are no longer updating.
- Can get a little repetitive and, unfortunately, boring.
- No in-between video sizes. You can either get the smallish, easily-downloaded, lower-quality .mp4, or you can get the huge 3gb 1080p clip. Take your pick.
- No 4K that I saw as of late April 2016 |
| Bottom Line: |
I was pleased overall. It's a huge network with a ton of content. Most of it is fairly vanilla, but I bet you'll find something you like. The preview of the site allows you see most actresses and stills of scenes IIRC. Kudos to the site for this.
Ads EVERYWHERE. It was mentioned in the previous review, but I wanted to reiterate it. I do approve of the lock icons on things that apparently aren't included in the membership, though.
The Milfhunter and Moms Bang Teens sites were standouts for me, with MH having lots of attractive and seemingly legitimate MILF models, and the energy in the MBT scenes seemed to be a step above most other sites'. Not to mention MBT's great combination of gorgeous MILFs interacting with college aged couples.
Video quality in the newer clips was good, but there was little to no in-between sizing. Huge and good, or small and okay. Take your pick.
Hey websites: There are still quite a few of us who aren't on 100Mbps internet connections. Put something in between "Enormous HD" and "still way too big considering the fairly mediocre quality" sizes. See Milehigh media or Tainster to get an idea of how 540p can be a viable option.
Download managers are a mixed bag. They work, although you'll likely run into login requests by your manager if too many downloads are queued up. Downloads that have already started will continue to work long after you've been logged out of the site, though.
Other people mention a download limit, but I never encountered it. It was probably a combination of my connection speed, scene choices, and download manager, but it wasn't a problem for me.
Bottom line: A huge site and hard to beat for a cheap price. A few inconveniences here and there, but a good way to get some good scenes from your favorite actresses.
Would I join again? Yes. |
|
06-24-16 09:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
82
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Saturated my 6 Mbps DSL connection
- Downthemall works
- No download limit that I encountered.
- Multiple encoding rates and formats, recent movies offer portable sizes up to 1080p
- You can download clips from a DVD or the entire DVD. Nice.
- Scenes include photo .zip files for downloading as well as screen captures.
- Even the reasonably sized ipad/iphone .mp4 clips are decent quality on a larger computer screen.
- It doesn't seem to log you out arbitrarily. Thank you, webmaster.
- Lots of short haired actresses if that's something you're interested in (not a category or tag, just a function of having a lot of actresses in general). |
| Cons: |
- Some photo zips are just low-res screen captures
- Ads inside
- Site didn't seem as responsive as it could've been, and I suspect it's because there is SO much going on in every page. It's a very, very visually-busy site.
- Apparently a very traffic-busy site as well, because I ran into a few "connection reset - server is too busy" pages while the downloads from the site continued along fine.
- When you click on the scene or link you want to visit, a HUGE full-page banner promoting the latest movie/actress/scene is at the top and you are forced to scroll down past it before you can see the content you were looking for. Very irritating, and so annoying I searched for browser add-ons to try to disable it.
- Can't find a way to mark actresses as favorites.
- Seems a bit silly, but there is no logout button that I could find.
-Their older videos are watchable but poor quality by today's standards.
- To be continued (nothing too bad, just a few more notes) |
| Bottom Line: |
Cons continued:
- The page layout can be very annoying. For example, if you click on updates, you get a scene/DVD/scene/DVD/scene/DVD layout, with the page and scenes/DVDs all sort of running together.
- Big size gap between video quality/encoding options, and wacky encoding options/sizes.
- Video download links expire after a day or so.
BOTTOM LINE
First and foremost, it's nice to not have to login and get past a captcha every hour or two after being logged out automatically. I don't think I was prompted to log in past the initial join date. Nicely done, NS.
A large site with a lot of content and quite a few hidden gems. For example: I saw that they only had one (1) Nicole Aniston scene and I was disappointed. When I click on it I discover the one (1) Nicole Aniston scene is her with short hair and her natural breasts. Full disclosure- The site review might've started at 110% because of that.
Seriously, though, there are a lot of actresses/scenes like that. If you've got some time it's worth digging through (even with the irritatations that will be addressed later) simply because they have a lot of stars I'd forgotten about or who are no longer active that you'll stumble across.
The site is heavily focusing on the stepson/daughter/brother/sister/mom/dad angle. Not my thing, but it's all fake exactly like every other plumber or pizza delivery guy setup.
The majority of the actresses are college aged, but there is a good MILF representation, too. Great mix of skin colors, hair length/style/color, etc. Looking for some short haired actresses? This is the place to visit.
In a reverse of what I usually see, the video links are only good for about a day in your download manager while the photo .zip links seem to last indefinitely. That's probably a fairly reasonable approach on the business end to keep people subscribed, but on the collector-consumer end this is a huge site with lots of content that you're not going to get unless you want to take a lot of time each day setting up new links.
GRIPES
A lot of the "glamcore" style movies are way too dark. I think they're aiming for artistic, but it just ends up looking like porn without adequate lighting.
Size/encoding- I don't get this at all. The newer movies are in HD, but the same clip in different resolutions will be named the same thing. EVERY .mp4 of a clip, from the mobile to the ipad to the 720 to the 1080, will be named "something_something_1920.mp4".
BIG gripe: You think you can maximize content downloaded but still get really good quality by grabbing the 720p clips, but they are often the exact same size or nearly exactly the same size as the 1080p clips. I can't see any advantage to downloading the 720p offerings when they offer 1920, 1440, and 720. I'm guessing all the others are converted down from the 1920, but I don't understand why so many sizes are identical.
Example: Ashley Jensen has a scene where the 720 and 1080 mp4s are nearly the same size (.84GB and .87GB respectively), and many of the full DVD offerings have 100% exactly the same size downloads for both 720 and 1080 offerings. I don't have a fast enough connection to test, but it makes me wonder if the resolution is exactly the same and only the screen size is manipulated when encoded.
It's a HUGE site, although that's tempered a bit by the way they pad each actresses' scene stats. Clicking on an actress gives you her scene, followed immediately by the DVD the scene came from as a second option. It often ends up looking like a repeat of itself. A better approach would be to have the DVD mentioned with the scene (for example, a clickable link saying "From the DVD "Everybody Loves This DVD" that goes to that DVD), but not repeated directly underneath.
For example: Choose Bobbi Starr. She's listed as having 35 scenes (woohoo!), but there are only 9 or 10 actual clips. The other 25 are the same clips in the full DVDs, the "party" version of the DVD (no xxx), bloopers, behind the scenes, etc. I didn't count off any points for that approach, but I view it as technically correct while still deceptive.
Lots of lingerie and nicely done "wife" style scenes, but quite a few silly striped socks and backwards baseball caps to force the "hey look, that 25 year old clearly just graduated high school" type fantasy, too.
I'm really surprised at how good this site is content-wise, but it's way too busy and not very pleasant to browse and view.
***It's the first paid site I've ever joined where I researched image blockers for Firefox to cut down on some of the clutter and get rid of the HUGE banner at the top that you have to scroll past every time***
The images are associated with the links to the videos, too, so it didn't work.
Webmaster- See Mile High Media / Famedigital for a more intuitive and pleasant user experience.
Bottom line- Get past the little annoyances and it's a large, good site with quality content. Would I join again?
Yes. |
|
06-11-16 11:49am
Replies (0)
|
Review
83
|
Brazzers
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Pics zips
- Various video formats available
- 1080 and 720 HD videos
- An enormous site with lots of content
- Download managers work, sort of
- No download limit that I found, but I'm on a slowish connection
- Discounted promo rates
- Tremendous amount of MILFs, which is definitely an added bonus for my tastes.
- Lots of variety in actresses. Blondes, blacks, Hispanics, Euro, etc. If you like it they've probably got it.
- Lots of stockings, lingerie, and glam hair when I didn't expect it. Again, added bonus for my tastes. |
| Cons: |
- Not all clips have photos, and not all photos are .zipped
- Actresses are sometimes listed twice (Chastity Lynn is in both "C" and "L" sections). Might not be padding, but still.
- Very, VERY much a pornstar site. Yes there is some glam and stockings, but it's overwhelmed by thigh tattoos, breast, butt, and lip implants, etc. You won't go through more than a couple of scenes before you run into ridiculous fake tits (why, ladies?)
- Advertisements inside paid area
- Questionable video formats/quality
- Download managers seem to be hit or miss |
| Bottom Line: |
Brazzers was on my radar for a while and I'm glad I finally tried them. It's one of the big names of the industry beside NA, BangBus, etc., and I'd already tried the others, so...
This might not make much sense until you see it, but I really approve of their non-gonzo approach to filming women giving oral sex. If face-fucking can possibly be considered tastefully done, then Brazzers has figured out how to do it. There is often quite a bit of sound involved, but little to no drool and none of that degrading gonzo-style "woman laying on her back and saliva coating her hair and making her eyeliner run before the man puts a foot on her head while entering her from behind" that so many sites have embraced.
There's a lot of campiness involved in some very unbelievable scenes. Alana Evans having unnoticed sex with a friend while he and two other men (one her "husband" IIRC) sit on a couch watching a ball game comes to mind, but they're fairly easy to excuse, too. I'm not knocking points off for that sort of stuff, just noting it so it's not too surprising when you see it for the first time. It's a comical setup to a pretty good follow up.
I'm a bit particular about video encoding rates/efficiency, and I really didn't get their approach. They list the bitrates on the video choice when you choose your download, and there is a huge jump between 2000 Kbps and 8000 Kbps 720p clips.
Put another way, there are either enormous (1 or 2+gb) 720p and 1080p options, or you can choose a near-unwatchable by modern standards blocky and poor-quality option that is a drastically smaller download.
Big gripe- I'm fairly sure there were multiple time-based downloadable clips when I joined (if you just wanted to grab the five minutes at the end for example), and now they're gone. That's very disappointing.
Download managers work, but the links time out or you will be logged out of the site and you'll only get a couple of the clips you queued up.
*** HEY BRAZZERS***
Offer something between the crappy SD clips and the enormous 720p and up ones. Give an in-between HQ option to bridge the gap. Look at Milehighmedia for examples.
Bottom line:
Some irritations, but a huge site with a lot of content, and it's one of the very few sites I carried on with an annual membership. |
|
06-03-16 05:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
84
|
Pornstar Platinum Network
(0)
|
|
05-23-16 12:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
85
|
Bi Maxx
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Probably the biggest player in an underserved niche
- Lots of content dating back years (300+ scenes according to TBP), but be aware that updates are sparse
- 1080p and 720p available for most if not all content
- .zip files for photos
- Quite a few big name Euro women
- Download managers (downthemall) work
- Not degrading or humiliation based. |
| Cons: |
- Infrequent updates
- Went through a bizarre party / orgy stage and a page or two of content is dedicated to that
- Files have no distinguishing naming characteristics
- A bit pricey when it used to be part of a network (IIRC - see comments below)
- Uninspired acting/directing in many scenes and too many scenes where the woman is nearby but not really participating or even really invited. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not a bad site and one of the main options for the genre, but it has some things about it that aren't ideal.
I joined back in 2011 or so, and rejoined recently. I was pretty disappointed to see there weren't many updates in the five or so years in between my memberships. Don't misunderstand, though. There's lots of content, just not if you've been a member before.
I think it was part of the Tainster network at one time, and the network offered tons of Euro MF/MFF content along with the bi site. Now you just get a membership to a gay site called guysgocrazy.com, too. That's fine since there are bound to be some gay guys who are straight-curious (is that even a thing?), but there's not really any incentive for guys who are more into women to stay on for more than a month, while bimaxx being in the Tainster network would probably be something to consider an annual membership for.
The new videos are all named exactly the same thing when you download depending on the resolution you choose. Interestingly, it's the same naming structure as Jim Slip's site. I'm guessing there is a central figure creating or managing these sites that sets them up this way. Regardless, it's a bad way of doing it. You'll end up with a folder full of files all named "1080p_complete" and with no idea what the scene is. It wasn't always this way, btw. My old files have the date (filming or release I'd imagine) and resolution. Not much better, but at least you could tell they were different without looking at the size column.
The content is fairly predictable hitchhiker, TV repairman, etc. setups. There are some good and passionate scenes hidden in the humdrum ones where there is actual energy between the men and women, but unfortunately there are way too many scenes with obviously homosexual men who are doing their homosexual male thing while a woman is sitting nearby and not welcome or necessary.
It's kind of surprising to realize how decent the acting and directing in the Reality Kings "Moms Bang Teens" scenes are, and that type of guidance would be very useful for this site.
The site went through an orgy period that I found ridiculous and awful. I doubt I was the only one since it looks like they moved away from that and back to the couples +1 scenes.
Bottom line- It's worth a try since the good outweighs the bad and since there aren't many choices in this genre. |
|
05-19-16 10:45am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I wrote a lengthy reply but wasn't logged in and it was eaten when I submitted. Sorry.
Short version- My idea was bad because I'm old and out of touch and yeah, you should probably go with social media unless you can figure out a way to get a big time rapper to mention you or repeatedly wear a baseball cap with your logo on it.
FWIW, I found PU by googling and being impressed with detailed reviews from actual users instead of a bunch of "THIS SITE SUX AND I HAT IT!!!" in the comment section after a webmaster's glowing 99/100 score.
|
05-11-16 10:00am
|
Review
87
|
DDF Network
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Gorgeous models
- Above average productions
- Download managers work.
- No download limit (note that another recent commenter has had issues that he thinks might be token related).
- A ridiculous amount of available content.
- HD except for older content.
- Multiple video encoding options.
- .zip files for photos. |
| Cons: |
- Video quality of older content isn't that great, but the site has been around a long time so that's forgivable.
- Can be repetitious.
- Not much variety in skin color. |
| Bottom Line: |
To me DDF is a Euro equivalent to the big sites like Naughty America, Brazzers, etc. There is little to no gonzo-style gagging or the like, but there is a substantial amount of foot fetish, watersports, and bondage in addition to the standard formulated and fairly vanilla sex. The modern stuff somehow leans more to the tasteful side of things even in the raunchier corners of the network.
There are different sites in the network dedicated to the above as well as lesbian, busty, blowjobs, etc., but when you go to the main page all the scenes and updates are organized together.
Speaking of, the sorting options are nice. You can choose a specific year if you want to start at the beginning of hundreds of videos, or you can pick the months in that year.
The majority of models are gorgeous, and the hair and makeup artists are obviously very skilled. Even the less attractive models look good, and it's shocking to see some "casting" style photographs of the models before seeing them in photos and scenes later. Some are almost unrecognizable (in a good way).
I didn't encounter any download limits, and it was no problem at all to pick the model, load up a bunch of links in my download queue, and come back later with it still chugging along and a few dozen gigabytes downloaded.
HD video (720 and 1080), but I didn't see any 4K options when I was a member through the end of January 2016.
Bottom line- Great site for collectors in general and especially those who enjoy European models.
Would I join again? Definitely. It's one of the only sites I've ever bought an annual membership for, so yes, absolutely. |
|
05-05-16 02:53pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
88
|
Jim Slip
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Underserved niche
- Decent personalities
- Simple but decent production values with the newest videos
- Laura, Jim's wife, films and joins in at times
- Emphasis on different outfits.
- .zip files of photos. |
| Cons: |
- Older videos are poor quality and not worth the time or trouble to investigate.
- Videos are all named the same thing, so you'll end up with a pile of dozens of "540p_fullcomplete" (an example, I don't recall the exact naming scheme) with no idea who is in any of them.
- Videos are split in half so that one full clip will be cut and used as two updates.
- Broken links or an entire broken website on some pages.
- Older clips are nearly unwatchable. |
| Bottom Line: |
I agree with rearadmiral on a number of his points. Overall it's not a bad site, especially if you enjoy older men with younger women, although that's not exclusively the setup for all the scenes. Unfortunately there's quite a bit to not like about the site, too. For me only a few standout scenes and actresses made up for the technical issues to take it out of the 60s when I scored it.
Laura often does the filming and is very involved (hands, sometimes more), and her site is set up similarly with her bringing home men and women.
Mix of pro and unknown actresses, although some of the actresses seem to simply be prostitutes (that was the premise at one time IIRC, but that was long before I joined). Many scenes are simply okay, but there are a few that are outstanding. Ava Delush's clips as well as a more recent shoulder-length blonde's scenes come to mind.
There were wardrobe changes, often with the same girl trying out a couple of outfits, with prostitutes, airline stewardesses, and ballerinas in the mix.
It's not a huge site, but there's a decent amount of material.
Video quality is good for the newer half (approximately) of clips, but there are no scene distinctions or actresses in the file names of the downloaded clips, so you'll be frustrated searching through the clips you downloaded to find that particular one you're looking for in order to rename it.
Streaming and download options (540, 720, and 1080p) as well as zipped photo files (one size).
Bottom line- It's not horrible and probably worth joining at least once if you have any interest in the niche or models.
Would I join again? Probably, but a year or two would have to pass for the updates to pile up before I did. |
|
04-20-16 09:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
89
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks. None of the videos I downloaded appear to have any problems. Unfortunately I'm not on a very fast connection and almost never stream, so I didn't test that aspect. I'll likely add it to my mental list of things to briefly look at for future reviews, though.
|
04-08-16 03:46am
|
Review
90
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Multiple encoding options for videos, 720 and 1080 included
- Photos available as .zip files.
- Multiple options available for size/quality of those .zip files.
- Gorgeous women and a good mixture of MILFs and college aged women. No silly forced "youngness" that I saw (pigtails, striped socks, etc.).
- Actual pubic hair on a few models. It's not a hairy site and there are more shaved than not, but thank goodness, and please let this be the beginning of a trend back to grown women looking like grown women again.
- Download managers work.
- No download limits that I found.
- Good searchable naming system. Actress and site names included in the video/photo file. Example: Mom_Nancy_12345, meaning from the "Mom" site, starting Nancy. Good job, site designers. I'm amazed that seems so difficult for most sites to incorporate. |
| Cons: |
- Ads inside. I know that's becoming more and more common, but I still paid to get in. Want to advertise? Offer two prices. One slightly cheaper and ad-subsidized, one a couple of bucks higher and ad-free. (FWIW, if the ads are subsidizing a reduced rate/discount then I don't mind so much. I suspect they're there for everyone, though.)
- Scenes won't always have model's names listed. Members will often make a comment below noting who it is, but that's the site's job, especially when linking to all of a model's vids.
- George.
Is.
Everywhere.
- Occasional dead links
- Models will be named in the video (literally- their name will be part of the video file name), but the actress won't be listed on the website. See Kirschley. OR vice versa. The actress will be listed, but the video links will be dead. See "Afternoon Rubdown" and "Her Plaything".
- Not all videos have photo sets.
- Can be a bit repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall a good site with fairly good navigation and just a few flaws here and there.
Gorgeous models. Almost all are European.
Download managers (downthemall at least) worked fine with the videos, but the photo .zip files would often time out.
The site logs you out occasionally, but it's more of an inconvenience than an irritation.
HD video options exist, but the lighting/filters/quality often makes the 1080p clips look a lot like the non-HD option. The 480 clips look very good and are very reasonably sized.
There are hundreds of scenes over four sites on the network. MILFs (Mom), lesbians (lesbea), reality-show type lesbians (girlfriends), tasteful sex (dane jones), and massage room scenario (appropriately named "massage room").
There are models that I've never seen anywhere else and who apparently did nothing else (Nancy IIRC), and a few recognizable stars (Zuzanna, Szilvia, Klarissa etc.).
There are also a few pleasant surprises like finding the beautiful and nicely-aged Rene, a favorite from Sapphic Erotica that I haven't seen in years, starring in multiple scenes on the lesbian sites.
I would guess George is in at least half of all the m/f scenes. Go George, but it gets sort of old seeing him everywhere.
Very vanilla sex and lots of creampie or stomach finishes on the m/f scenes. I don't recall any anal, and definitely no drool-streaked-eyeliner-and-that-guy's-foot-on-her-head-while-roughly-entering-her-from-behind sort of stuff. Thank goodness. This is all just attractive, tasteful couples with good, if sometimes a bit soft, lighting.
I'd like to see a bit more age-appropriate lingerie including teddies, stockings, garters, etc., but there's nothing wrong with what is in place.
Would I join again? Yes. |
|
04-06-16 08:16am
Replies (5)
|
Review
91
|
Team Skeet
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Tremendous amount of content.
- Varied niches in multiple sites.
- Good mix of skin color, body types, etc.
- HD videos.
- No download limits.
- Good navigation and search function.
- Download managers work.
- Promo offers
- Great preview. You can pretty much see what you're getting right up to the point of watching the videos. |
| Cons: |
- Lots of girl next door types, but he innocent young girl mystique is easily broken by yes-I'm-a-stripper tattoos on some models.
- "Innocent young girl" seems a bit forced at times. Silly oversized glasses, pigtails, big hair bows, striped socks, etc. I get the fantasy aspect, but often less is more.
- Um... Let's see... Not enough MILFs? (Joke, btw.) Seriously, there are very few cons I can think of. If you lean towards college-aged girls, you probably need to try this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This review will be fairly sort of short mostly because there is very little to criticize. Ads inside (and what kept the review from being in the 90s), some rare broken links, and... yeah, that's about it. This is definitely one of the better sites I've joined so far as the user is concerned. I'd put it right up there with Anilos / Nubiles and Sapphic Erotica as a site everyone should probably join at least once if they have any interest whatsoever in the content. It really does seem to be geared towards the user. Even the preview of the site gives a surprisingly good idea of what's inside before joining.
There are multiple video options, and a "best of" choice that is similar to (IIRC) Naughty America's small 5-minute clips. I really appreciate sites that do that, and the only other request I would ask is to offer it in varying quality as well.
There's the occasional oddity like a broken link here and there, or pleasant surprises like the majority of the site being typical American BangBros/NA/Brazzers style of filming before stumbling onto strangely attractive and very European models and filming. Luna comes to mind:
http://www.teamskeet.com/t1/profile/view.../luna/?nats=MDowOjIy
But the good very much outweighs the bad.
Bottom line:
If you like this genre then definitely give this site a shot.
Webmaster- Do y'all run a MILF site? |
|
03-28-16 05:48am
Replies (0)
|
Review
92
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Attractive models.
- Tasteful settings.
- Nicely filmed, but a con at times.
- Photo zips, too.
- Quite often enthusiastic and believable action. The scenes with Szilvia Lauren are possibly worth the price of admission. Holy cow.
- Epoch as a secondary biller.
- No download limits that I could tell.
- Decent size site. 70+ pages of 12 scenes per page. |
| Cons: |
- Navigation
- Questionable lighting and cinematography at times
- Not much visual difference to my eyes between 720p and 1080p videos
- Download managers are mostly useless.
- No photo quality options
- CONSTANT login requests.
- Not necessarily a con for everyone, but pretty much all white girls. Quite a few extremely attractive white girls, mind you, but don't expect too much variation beyond blonde, brunette, and redheads.
- Tasteful lighting and filming, but some scenes are just a step above late night movies on Cinemax. |
| Bottom Line: |
A nice looking glamcore site that I'd been considering for a while, and I'm pleased overall with the content and glad I finally gave it a shot. Quite a few scenes looked like they could have some sort of relationship with the crew responsible for filming some of the Sexyhub /Dane Jones sites.
BUT...
- Constant login requests.
At one point it let me choose a video, choose the download option, and immediately logged me out after clicking the 720p option. The video didn't begin to download and I had to re-login after the next click one or two seconds after choosing the video.
Inexcusable.
- Worse still were the login requests that led to an "Oops! It's broken! Try again later" page that was there after refreshing the page without needing to log in again.
- Poor navigation.
Want to see all the models in alphabetical order?
Go to the "Models" pulldown, and look for the... wait, there's not an option. Only "Top Rated, Most Viewed, etc." So you click on "Top Rated" and see that there's another pulldown on the following page that has "All" under the "Sort By" option.
And a few days later, after one of your dozens of login requests, you realize the "Models" pulldown button itself is a link to all the models.
- Dead links
I suspect these are related to their attempts at site security and their constant login requests.
Lots of 404 "Page Not Found" errors even when you're logged in and not prompted to log in again.
Click on a video and the 404 error comes up. Hit page refresh/f5 a moment later and the page is fine. Very irritating.
- Encoding
The 480p videos really seem to be the sweet spot for size and quality. I was surprised that the 1080p clips don't look that much better than the 720p ones in most cases. I suspect it has to do with the lighting and whatever filters they use to soften and romanticize the clips.
- Download managers work if you consider "work" to just mean "they can be used to download a few clips simultaneously just like if you didn't use one." The system logs you out so frequently that any clips that take more than a few minutes to begin will fault out and download a "default.htm" result. The site *will* allow you to resume a clip that's only halfway downloaded, though, so that's a plus, but I wouldn't say download managers really, truly work with this site. Not in the sense that you can load up the night before and wake up the next morning with a dozen completions.
-Bottom line-
A pretty good if occasionally irritating glamcore site. Lots of nice looking "couples" filmed in soft lighting with good backgrounds. Lots of solo and lesbian scenes (I'd guess over half of all scenes), and apparently very capable hair and makeup artists since I saw some actresses I don't often find attractive that looked quite nice in their scenes.
I'd join again.
*** To get to Epoch as the biller, (thanks and credit goes to malikstarks for the tip re: Bangbros user comments):
If Epoch isn't the primary biller, enter everything correctly except for your credit card's expiration date on the initial purchase page. Make it a year in the future, and the system will reject it. Do it two or so more times and they'll send you to the Epoch site.*** |
|
03-14-16 09:27am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
93
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Thanks for giving everyone a heads up. I try to do the BangBros trick someone mentioned in their review/complaint with EVERY website that doesn't use Epoch these days:
If Epoch isn't the primary biller, enter everything correctly except for your credit card's expiration date. Make it a year in the future, and the system will reject it.
Repeat the year-in-the-future wrong date when it tells you there was an error and prompts you to re-enter your info.
On the third time (possibly fourth?), and assuming Epoch is a secondary biller, it should give you a different error message and say something like "please wait while you're redirected."
The Epoch page should appear next.
|
02-19-16 05:21pm
|
Review
94
|
Futanaria
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Real life weird Japanamation fetish come to life!
- Meets a particular genre
- Some fairly popular models at times
- Less erotic but more realistic than straponcum.com
- Pictures and videos.
- Download managers work, no download limits.
- HD and SD .wmv and .mp4. HD looks pretty decent and is reasonably sized.
- Good download speeds saturated my DSL |
| Cons: |
- Deceptive bait and switch of available videos. Caveat emptor. More below.
- Slow updates. They release photos, then days or weeks later they'll release the corresponding video.
- Overpriced at $30. The $15 rebill ( and with such infrequent updates I have no idea why ANYONE would do that) is much more realistic and would have more people re-joining.
- Pretty darn specialized fetish and definitely not for everyone. But hey, that can be said for any fetish. Different strokes, etc.
- Camera angles don't seem to be much of a consideration.
- Nothing fancy regarding the site itself. If you like flashy you're in the wrong spot.
- Some models aren't very attractive, and the style of filming/clothing doesn't help.
- No zip files for photos. |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked the site
BUT
- Quite a few of the videos are pretty ridiculous (exercise ball sized breasts and/or a prosthetic penis the size of two fire extinguishers laid end to end and/or two or three dicks sprouting from the same girl). But hey, the premise is pretty ridiculous to begin with and I'm sure someone likes it, so this fulfills that demand.
- Some well known models including India Summer, Alex Chance, Abby Cross, Alexis Monroe, Alison Pierce and others working under silly names like "Zoey Zipperripper" are on the site. A real-name reference (I think it's run by the same folks) can be found at http://futanaria.ws/category/real-names/
- Don't expect much in the way of cinematography. Most scenes are filmed from one or two stationary tripods.
- The worst part is how they present their available content. Go ahead, click on the link taking you to the site.
Now go to "see all scenes" at the bottom right of the page after clicking through the content warning page.
It looks like there are five pages of ~75 videos available for download when you're initially clicking through the site and considering joining, doesn't it? After all, you're "seeing all scenes," right? Now scroll all the way down to the bottom and be sure to catch that little "Note: Older videos are rotated offline and can be purchased at Radrotica.com" text.
Now go to radrotica in a new tab (keep futanaria.com open) and see what their latest futanaria video available for purchase is. Remember the name and go back to page 1 of futanaria.com's "see all scenes." You're probably still at the bottom of the page, so scroll up. Up. Up some more. Up. Keep going. Are you around halfway yet? Okay, start looking for the name of the scene that is available for purchase at radrotica.
Everything past that isn't available for download unless you pay them $3-$5 per clip at a different website.
Now go ahead and count up what IS available for download out of those five enormous pages of clips.
It's less than 40, isn't it? 40 clips out of the 300+ shown are available for you to download with your paid subscription.
Again, it's not a bad site and definitely fills a niche, but it's extremely deceptive and pretty overpriced for what you're allowed to see of their library.
I gave it a 70 because it's such an exclusive niche and the videos aren't horrible, but everything good about the site only brings it up to a 70 since the deceptive available library nonsense easily knocks 40 or 50 points off. |
|
02-17-16 11:00am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
95
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Thanks for the interaction. I think that's one of the things that makes these sites valuable for both producers and consumers.
FWIW, I think the highest score I've given ANY site is a 90 or 91, so a 77 is pretty respectable. I really do think you might improve subscription numbers if the hairy angle was advertised more.
Since we're here, this model was one of the big reasons I joined but she wasn't on the site. I tried to keep it from influencing the score since there are people who would possibly look at her and say "Ugh, yuck!", but it was a bit disappointing to not find her after seeing the set and watermark:
http://www.picsmaster.net/gallery/olderwomen/eb40d3/04.jpg
Are you removing content after a certain amount of time or were there numerous casualties from the 2012 move?
(Any chance you know the model's name, btw?)
|
10-03-15 10:44am
|
Review
96
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Preface: Different strokes for different folks.
- I cannot recommend this site enough if you're into old, out of shape, marginally attractive, downright unattractive, and/or outright fat and ugly women, many with varying degrees of three-day stubble hairy armpits, never-shaven hairy armpits that they try to lick, hairy crotches, hairy thighs, and hairy calves.
- Some good looking women here and there.
- Download managers allowed, but see cons.
- Some sets have high quality photos (50-100mb+/set) for optimal viewing of all those hairy legs, thighs, and armpits.
- Often .zip files are available for images.
- Some of the models have dozens of sets available.
- Some of the less attractive models are made slightly more appealing by wearing age appropriate clothing/lingerie and seeming to enjoy what they're doing. |
| Cons: |
- Only 10-20% of models are, ahem, "traditionally" attractive. Think Victoria Tyler, Mimi Moore, Kayla Synz, Daryl Hannah, Heidi Hanson (still with hairy armpits, though), Betsy Blue, etc. The other 80% or so are Saturday afternoon at Wal-Mart.
- A truly shocking number of old, out of shape, marginally attractive, downright unattractive women, and a great deal of outright fat and ugly women, many with varying degrees of three-day stubble hairy armpits, never-shaven hairy armpits that they try to lick, hairy crotches, hairy thighs, and hairy calves.
- Download managers will yield a 400 error after X amount of time. I don't know what X is, but I suspect it's logging the member out or changing the long and elaborate download links since there were instances where the download failed while I wasn't required to log back in.
- Quite a few models have no picture or video sets, and lots of videos have no preview image whatsoever.
Cons continued below... |
| Bottom Line: |
- Many (most?) sets have standard (7-10mb/zip) or medium resolution images. (10-50mb/set). Larger sets are sometimes available.
- Sometimes you get the extra step or two of having to tell the website you want to create a zip file of the images that you can then download.
- Depending on your interests there is more softcore posing than hardcore, but there is a bit of hardcore here and there.
- Did I mention the main focus seems to be on hairy crotches, armpits, thighs, and legs.
- .zip file names are shortened to be unrecognizable or identical. Heidi Hanson's sets might be "hei013XYZ_838320.zip" or dozens of "heidi_all.zip", which might be exactly the same thing Heidi Smith (made up) set's are named.
- It wasn't unusual to go through a page of sixteen or so models before seeing one that looked like it might be worth clicking.
- In case you missed it, lots and lots and lots of body hair.
*END CONS*
Bottom line?
There's a substantial amount of hairy leg and hairy armpit fetish material on a site that is, according to TBP, simply a mature site. The armpit/leg hair fetish angle may be played down, but when the models are licking their own bushy armpits or a lesbian scene focuses (literally, the rest of the photo is out of focus) on one model licking the other model's hairy legs... well, it's hard to deny. You've got a hairy fetish site.
Again, different strokes for different folks. I like a nicely kept bush, and don't mind it going beyond and behind what is typically kept these days (Jamie Lynn on the site is a good example).
Thigh hair? No thanks. Calves? Put your pants back on, please.
I'd never, and still haven't, considered the underarm genre, so I was a bit taken aback when it began to dawn on me that nearly every model has her arms up to expose her stubbly, hairy, or sometimes shaved (oh thank goodness) underarms within the first five or six images.
This is a mature women body hair fetish site, and to a certain degree an armpit site. When it becomes a bit of a game to notice how many shots into the set the woman is raising her arms above her head to show the cameraman her underarms, you've probably got an armpit site.
(It's comical to reach the point where you're surprised when a model *did* shave her armpits and legs.)
Intentional armpit stubble is a new one for me, btw. /shudder/ Again, different strokes. There's nothing wrong with that, but go ahead and market yourself as the fetish site you are. Sure you won't get folks like me to sign up, but I won't be signing up again, anyway. You probably will get the people who ARE looking for that sort of thing to sign up more than once, especially once they initially know that's what your site is about.
There are a few good models here and there, and a decent amount of content overall (and 10% or so are not only attractive but also really nicely shot with business attire, lingerie, etc.) but I doubt I'd come back now that I'm aware of the hair-everywhere aspect.
tl;dr -
I'm giving a slightly better than average score because I found some previously unknown sets of a few attractive models and the site isn't bad once you accept what you're logging in to, but please consider marketing yourself as a hairy old woman fetish site. |
|
10-01-15 08:13am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
97
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
blueron's Comment
From their "join" page:
http://imgur.com/7VFifJf
"Unlimited HD Streaming". Yay, except for those of us who don't care and/or who don't have the connections to support it.
They were on my radar to join in the next month or two, but no downloads is complete deal breaker with other high quality, download-friendly, and fairly interchangeable sites like RK and NA being available for similar prices.
Good luck, Mofos.
|
08-24-15 08:17am
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nature's way of saying "lick here".
|
08-21-15 02:42pm
|
Review
99
|
Stiffia.com
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Decent selection of genres/movies/scenes. Lots of euro stars.
- Magma and Pinko were pretty much the entire reason I joined.
- They claim you'll get access to another site after each month of your membership. |
| Cons: |
- Can't tell too much of a difference beyond size between HD and non-HD clips, and I suspect they're all just DVD rips by someone who doesn't know/care.
- Logs you out every half hour and you fill out a captcha to login. Every. Single. Time. And 50% of the time the captcha will tell you it was wrong even if you know you entered it correctly.
- PITA to use overall.
- Slow and unresponsive.
- Every downloaded clip is named something like "scene_hd" or "scene_sd_high". No numbers, no nothing. You will have no idea which movie, scene, or actress is involved.
- Broken or missing links.
- Actresses show up as having X number of scenes, but that's apparently over the network as a whole (and it doesn't point you in the direction of the other sites/scenes). A site showing six scenes for a particular actress may just have one clip available. |
| Bottom Line: |
Possibly the most irritating and poorly conceived and executed pay site/network I've ever joined.
Captcha login requirements every twenty minutes or so.
Random dead links.
Download links missing entirely for some scenes.
Frequent "Site down for maintenance" and 503 errors when trying to login. Then the site is immediately available upon refresh.
Download managers won't work because download links change rapidly. If it took 15 minutes to download one movie the next one will give you an error message because the link no longer works or the system has already logged you out.
Quite a few movies wouldn't finish downloading because link was apparently killed *during* the download.
Every picture ZIP file I downloaded was corrupted and would not unzip.
Some download links downloaded entire movies that the scene was pulled from (but note there is no option anywhere to download the whole movie), and some scenes were missing download links for the scene entirely.
Out of a dozen or so pages of actresses listings on the individual sites, the last half (or more) won't even have photos associated with the name. Just the same blank silhouette for everyone. If you're lucky you can click on it and wait for the really unresponsive website to load and maybe show a thumbnail of a scene showing her face, though.
-------
This network has tremendous potential, but it's too much trouble to use. It *may*, might, maybe, POSSIBLY be worth the $36 annual special I've seen offered, but even then you're going to be constantly irritated unless the site owners make some major changes to make things more user friendly. |
|
05-22-15 09:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
100
|
Fake Hub
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Multiple download options. Most videos offer small but decent quality .flv, 720p .wmvs, and a medium quality .flv that splits the difference. Some offer more in-between options.
- 720p videos for most if not all of the shoots
- Streaming doesn't count against the 20gb/day download limits.
- A few pros, but mostly girl (and some boy) next door types.
- Very attractive models (majority European) and a few fairly plain ones.
- Decent acting, although it probably helps that I don't speak the language.
- Frequent internal cumshots |
| Cons: |
- Downloads limited to 20gb per day (again, streaming apparently doesn't count against it)
- No indicator showing what you've used or when the limit clock resets. Midnight? Noon? The hour and minute you joined? Who knows.
- The 720p videos don't really look all that great. They're okay, but very few of them seem worth the massive size, and there are often artifacts. Considering the size and download restrictions, they don't make too much sense to download unless it's a model you really like.
- Subtitles take up room on the screen
- Ads after you get inside.
- Banner at the bottom of some of the standard definition .flv clips that are available for download saying something along the lines of "this is a low quality clip from fakehub.com, to get the HD version..." |
| Bottom Line: |
First thing - I subtract 5 points immediately if there are ads after the login page, and there are three in a row similar in dimensions to the clickable videos. They're at the bottom and not easy to click on, but I still paid to get in and I don't need or want advertisements, especially when there is already a "promos" link at the top that takes you to a page of ads. I'm fairly okay with that one since it's not obtrusive and they are offering discounts, but I greatly dislike constant advertising within a paysite, even if you have to scroll down to see it.
-
Overall the fakehub network is pretty good. I'm not a huge fan of the "fake" premise, but it has quite a few videos starring Zuzana Z and Szilvia Lauren, and I am a huge fan of both of them. So I joined.
There are three "fake" scenarios. A doctors office, a taxi, and modeling interviews.
-
The doctors office is the weakest, mostly because of the attempt at replicating a hidden camera. If that's your thing, that's fine, but the problem is that it is mixed with decent non-hidden camera clips, but not when you may want them. You'll get a hidden camera scene of oral sex and you can't really see too much, but a standard video clip of intercourse clearly showing the small of her back. And then it's back to hidden cameras for the finale. Puzzling, but, again, not my thing, and it may be exactly what others like.
No real point in choosing the downloadable HD videos for this scenario that I could tell.
These are mostly male doctor and female patient, and occasionally female nurse and female patient. I don't think I saw any male patient female nurse scenes, although I didn't look too hard.
My suggestion? Offer both hidden and non-hidden videos for the same scene. You've obviously got them, and making them available doubles (triples) your video content for the site.
-
The next scenario is the taxi. A driver picks up a passenger, something happens to require the rider to show her breasts/give oral sex/have sex/etc. to "pay" for the ride.
It's okay, although the occasional enormous "FAKETAXI.com" sticker in the rear glass of the vehicle pretty much dispels any illusion.
Again, the HD scenes are dark and grainy and not really worth downloading unless you like the specific model.
Not too bad overall, though.
-
The fake modeling agency is the best of the bunch.
A male or female "scout" interviews models, gets them naked, takes some photos, and explains that more detailed photos and videos are required to see how the prospective model will perform for the clients.
The male scout interacts with females, while the female scout (Zuzanna, Szilvia, Barra, and Jane, a gorgeous brunette MILF) then interacts with both men and women, and occasionally a male scout will join the FF scenes as well.
I'd imagine it's because of the controlled environment and decent lighting, but these offer the network's better HD scenes.
* edit* forgot that there's a public version as well. Things happen in public-ish area after an "agent" approaches potential talent, often filmed at night or in darker locations.
-
What would I recommend to make it better?
- A limit counter or at least some indication of when the clock resets.
- Get rid of the banners on the standard definition .flv files.
- Photo options.
- Consider offering surprise bi-mmf scenarios with the female agent interviews as well. The setup would be essentially the same as the MFF scenes that are already being done, and it's an underserved niche and could easily be incorporated and draw more customers. Implement a similar scheme as tainster's "fully clothed" offerings so that you offer exactly the same scene with two different outcomes/sites and people who were/weren't interested could choose accordingly.
-
Would I recommend it? Probably. It has some things I dislike and a few disappointments, but it's worth a look if you can find a deal. |
|
04-22-15 08:24am
Replies (1)
|
|
