All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Divinx's Reply
Yeah, it probably wouldn't be so irritating if they arranged them so that, after clicking on an actress, the videos you can honestly, actually, truly, 100% download were lined up in front of all of the advertisements for the other sites.
Clicking through to look for more might be okay, but having to click through to look for ***any*** on a paid site that shows the actress is a major problem.
|
09-06-16 08:43am
|
Reply
102
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Weird, especially considering my internet connection is only physically capable of (ideally) 65 GB in 24 hours.
I wonder if they don't allow download managers and that's what triggered it?
|
07-28-16 03:52pm
|
Reply
103
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
clark kent's Review
Wow. 100%.
Better than Met Art.
Better than DDF.
Better than Sapphic Erotica, Team Skeet, MC Nudes, Karups, W4B, TLE, Naughty America, Brazzers, and every other site listed here.
How very impressive. Must be one hell of an absolutely perfect site.
|
07-25-16 12:51pm
|
Comment
104
|
Pornstar Platinum Network
(0)
|
|
05-23-16 12:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I wrote a lengthy reply but wasn't logged in and it was eaten when I submitted. Sorry.
Short version- My idea was bad because I'm old and out of touch and yeah, you should probably go with social media unless you can figure out a way to get a big time rapper to mention you or repeatedly wear a baseball cap with your logo on it.
FWIW, I found PU by googling and being impressed with detailed reviews from actual users instead of a bunch of "THIS SITE SUX AND I HAT IT!!!" in the comment section after a webmaster's glowing 99/100 score.
|
05-11-16 10:00am
|
Reply
106
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks. None of the videos I downloaded appear to have any problems. Unfortunately I'm not on a very fast connection and almost never stream, so I didn't test that aspect. I'll likely add it to my mental list of things to briefly look at for future reviews, though.
|
04-08-16 03:46am
|
Reply
107
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Thanks for giving everyone a heads up. I try to do the BangBros trick someone mentioned in their review/complaint with EVERY website that doesn't use Epoch these days:
If Epoch isn't the primary biller, enter everything correctly except for your credit card's expiration date. Make it a year in the future, and the system will reject it.
Repeat the year-in-the-future wrong date when it tells you there was an error and prompts you to re-enter your info.
On the third time (possibly fourth?), and assuming Epoch is a secondary biller, it should give you a different error message and say something like "please wait while you're redirected."
The Epoch page should appear next.
|
02-19-16 05:21pm
|
Reply
108
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Thanks for the interaction. I think that's one of the things that makes these sites valuable for both producers and consumers.
FWIW, I think the highest score I've given ANY site is a 90 or 91, so a 77 is pretty respectable. I really do think you might improve subscription numbers if the hairy angle was advertised more.
Since we're here, this model was one of the big reasons I joined but she wasn't on the site. I tried to keep it from influencing the score since there are people who would possibly look at her and say "Ugh, yuck!", but it was a bit disappointing to not find her after seeing the set and watermark:
http://www.picsmaster.net/gallery/olderwomen/eb40d3/04.jpg
Are you removing content after a certain amount of time or were there numerous casualties from the 2012 move?
(Any chance you know the model's name, btw?)
|
10-03-15 10:44am
|
Reply
109
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
blueron's Comment
From their "join" page:
http://imgur.com/7VFifJf
"Unlimited HD Streaming". Yay, except for those of us who don't care and/or who don't have the connections to support it.
They were on my radar to join in the next month or two, but no downloads is complete deal breaker with other high quality, download-friendly, and fairly interchangeable sites like RK and NA being available for similar prices.
Good luck, Mofos.
|
08-24-15 08:17am
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nature's way of saying "lick here".
|
08-21-15 02:42pm
|
Comment
111
|
Mommy Blows Best
(0)
|
|
06-27-12 06:32pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
112
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
An update:
I've figured out what looks to be a workaround for a download manager, but I won't post any hints until after my month has run out. Sorry if that seems jerkish, but I don't want them "fixing" it until my time is up.
So, technically, "download managers: yes, should work" is accurate. Using them isn't simple or intuitive, which ultimately means they are discouraged.
Comically, even at the blazing 150KB/s speeds they provide, it's probably possible to download all ~350 videos in their "high WMV" format in a month. Let that give you some idea of the size and quality of the clips. One can assume Private has access to their own original DVDs, so it makes no sense why most of the clips should be so small and of such poor quality.
I was initially impressed with the compact size of their 1080p encodings until I reached a fast-motion and/or high-contrast section. Size-wise they did a good job, but the quality suffered greatly (single pass?) and I decided I'd rather download non-HD without their artifacts and blockiness rather than waste time on their subpar HD material.
There are ads for other sites (Reality Kings was one IIRC) inside the members area. I'd mark 20 more points off their score for this if I were allowed to. Paying members shouldn't have to look at non-related site ads. If you want to double-dip with advertisements then you should reduce the price. Ad-free price and ad-supported price, perhaps?
Their search/actress links are next to useless. It's almost like they don't know who is in their scenes and instead used broad catch-alls to connect names to scenes. "That lady is blonde and it looks like she's got a tattoo on her ankle," someone at Private.com must've said, "and Kathia Nobili is blonde and she has a tattoo on her stomach, so let's put them both under the Nobili link." Horrible.
And more points off for way too heavy a focus on their not-really-that-erotic snow/beach niche scenes. I bet they are ~15% of all the clips on the site.
(Frankly, I suspect no real time was put into this site and they just ripped whatever movies they had left in a cardboard box after breaking down their 2007 AVN awards promo booth. The website probably started with the moving of some folding chairs and a crumpled up vinyl banner.)
Hey, look at them having sex in the snow! Hey, more snow! Oh good, a snowmobile for them to have sex on. Look, a beach! More beaches! Wow, even more beaches! Hey, a boat! Another boat! Awesome! Oh good, snow again. Holy crap, that guy is wearing a bigfoot costume with the crotch cut out (yep, seriously). C'mon, Private. You were classy. You were the best. Act like it.
I can't say it enough- Don't join. Not even for a month. You'll be disappointed.
|
06-19-11 06:01pm
|
Reply
113
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Ignorance. Sorry. KB/s.
Thanks and I'll try to edit the main review.
|
06-11-11 04:31am
|
Comment
114
|
Strapon Moms Fuck Guys
(0)
|
|
04-02-10 01:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
115
|
Strapon Fuckers
(0)
|
|
04-02-10 01:46pm
Replies (0)
|
|