| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
HDV Pass
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1920 x 1080 videos.
No sneaky checkmarked gotcha! boxes on the credit card page when initially signing up.
Website is pretty responsive while you're repeatedly logging back in.
Offers streaming.
Seymore Butts' site is included but not the focus of the review (only showing four videos with Shane, btw). |
| Cons: |
It logs you out every ten minutes if you're downloading videos, and you have to enter captcha to get back in. It doesn't force you to log back in as frequently if you're only streaming the videos.
Download managers don't work. Let me rephrase: Queuing doesn't work, and if you try to download two videos at the same time one or both will usually fail. LOADS of 416 errors, and downloads don't resume where failed.
Downloads seem to fail 25%-40% of the time. Example: http://imgur.com/2hoHW5x
If you try to download two videos you are no longer able to view any pages on the website. Too many connections, I suppose.
Put simply, you can download whatever videos you're willing to start, restart, babysit, re-enter captcha, restart, etc.
Poor lighting and many washed-out scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is pretty vanilla stuff and not worth the time and trouble for the too-few videos you're allowed to download.
If your focus is on streaming you may be more pleased with it, but there are still too few videos and too much trouble when sites like videobox exist.
*** Revised on the 8th. My initial review was too harsh, and I've taken the score from a 65 to a 69. |
|
03-07-14 11:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
Housewife 1 On 1
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good looking mostly MILFs in nice clothes and/or lingerie
- Multiple download formats (that, technically, you won't be able to access/download)
- Epoch is apparently really good about refunding disappointed subscribers' fees. |
| Cons: |
- Bait and switch.
- Actually, not really any switch. Just bait.
- It is apparently possible to join a Naughty America site and not have access to any videos. Link below. |
| Bottom Line: |
AVOID AVOID AVOID
This is no longer a clone site, but as many people as possible should be steered away from Naughty America since their switch to their new subscription... no, not subscription. Billing... something. I'm still not sure how to phrase that because most people expect that a subscription will give them access to the content they thought they were subscribing to.
Guess what? Naughty America is getting all M. Knight Shyamalan and subverting your expectations with what you thought you wanted to do with your money. Yep, it turns out Bruce Willis was dead the entire time, and you'll want to watch how this movie ends, too. So far they've gone from complete network access to access of one site's content ONLY if it's less than a month old, and now they've switched to what appears to be no site content whatsoever unless it just happens to pop up in the roll of the dice for the daily updates that they let you see but that have nothing to do with your subscription (updates is used loosely, btw, since most of the "updates" you are allowed to view appear to be old videos).
Housewife 1 on 1 is still updating and shows new content as recently as September 5th, 2018. BUT, you apparently can't access it after you pay your money and subscribe to the site. What you'll get is random videos from other Naughty America sites (and, in fairness, possibly one or two videos from Housewife 1 on 1, but they'll be the result of completely random chances exactly like all the other videos), with the chance to buy ANOTHER subscription to super subscribe to the site you thought you'd just paid $20 to subscribe to. But you didn't. You paid the entry fee to have access to the upgrade, and, after you pay the additional subscription fee to the site you just subscribed to, THEN you'll get to access the videos on the site you subscribed to.
No, really. I'm not joking. Read it again if it doesn't make sense.
What you do get is just random videos from the Naughty America hard drive. It's this part on the signup page, btw:
"Updated daily with exclusive videos from our library."
Yes, that reads like they are creating so much content that there are daily updates, but scroll down some more to find this one:
"Membership Upgrades Available Inside!"
And that's exactly what they mean.
Go read the Naughty America forums. They're open to the public. You'll find lots of stuff like this from yesterday (9-9-18): " What did I just pay for? $24.99. cant access ANY scenes."
https://forums.naughtyamerica.com/topic/34458-what-did-i-just-pay-for-2499-cant-access-any-scenes/
AVOID AVOID AVOID |
|
09-10-18 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Jim Slip
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Underserved niche
- Decent personalities
- Simple but decent production values with the newest videos
- Laura, Jim's wife, films and joins in at times
- Emphasis on different outfits.
- .zip files of photos. |
| Cons: |
- Older videos are poor quality and not worth the time or trouble to investigate.
- Videos are all named the same thing, so you'll end up with a pile of dozens of "540p_fullcomplete" (an example, I don't recall the exact naming scheme) with no idea who is in any of them.
- Videos are split in half so that one full clip will be cut and used as two updates.
- Broken links or an entire broken website on some pages.
- Older clips are nearly unwatchable. |
| Bottom Line: |
I agree with rearadmiral on a number of his points. Overall it's not a bad site, especially if you enjoy older men with younger women, although that's not exclusively the setup for all the scenes. Unfortunately there's quite a bit to not like about the site, too. For me only a few standout scenes and actresses made up for the technical issues to take it out of the 60s when I scored it.
Laura often does the filming and is very involved (hands, sometimes more), and her site is set up similarly with her bringing home men and women.
Mix of pro and unknown actresses, although some of the actresses seem to simply be prostitutes (that was the premise at one time IIRC, but that was long before I joined). Many scenes are simply okay, but there are a few that are outstanding. Ava Delush's clips as well as a more recent shoulder-length blonde's scenes come to mind.
There were wardrobe changes, often with the same girl trying out a couple of outfits, with prostitutes, airline stewardesses, and ballerinas in the mix.
It's not a huge site, but there's a decent amount of material.
Video quality is good for the newer half (approximately) of clips, but there are no scene distinctions or actresses in the file names of the downloaded clips, so you'll be frustrated searching through the clips you downloaded to find that particular one you're looking for in order to rename it.
Streaming and download options (540, 720, and 1080p) as well as zipped photo files (one size).
Bottom line- It's not horrible and probably worth joining at least once if you have any interest in the niche or models.
Would I join again? Probably, but a year or two would have to pass for the updates to pile up before I did. |
|
04-20-16 09:49am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
54
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
|
12-02-17 04:09am
Replies (1)
|
Review
55
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of attractive older women, just like the name implies
- A very old site, with content dating back more than a decade
- Photos and videos often available
- The site administrator is active on PU
- Other sites available on network with subscription |
| Cons: |
- Extremely strict download limits
- A very old site that, if you look at realistically, mostly has old content
- Videos older than a couple of years look pretty bad
- Most videos are fairly uninspired
- Probably exclusive, but you might wonder "Is this ATK? Have I seen these shoots on ATK?" at some point. Same photographer(s) apparently. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm reviewing each Karups site since they're apparently still treated as individual sites even though they've all recently become part of a network. That's a good thing, since "buy one, get two free" is a pretty uncommon occurrence, but also because many of the models were apparently listed on more than one Karups site. If you wanted all of (arbitrary name) "Cathy 2" photos and videos, you would've needed to join at least two sites. Now you can get all of "Cathy 2"s stuff with the same network membership, which is a good thing.
Karups Older Women is, shockingly, an adult site focusing on older women. There are some really attractive ladies, too, along with mediocre and a few unattractive ones. But different strokes for different folks, and there is something for almost everyone here so long as they like more mature and fairly homogeneous (racially) women.
There is content going back to 2006. As you would suspect, most of the older photography content looks fairly dated, but that's fine. It's available, and that's the most important part.
There is often video content, too, but it can be mostly summed up as "don't bother." Most is uninspired and not filmed at a high professional level. The older stuff looks worse than tube videos, but that can be forgiven since it's old stuff.
The biggest "con" is the strict download limits. Not gigabytes, mind you, but time. As was posted by the webmaster on the karups.com "user comments" section, quote:
"Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. ... We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc..."
What that means is you can download all you want, but you have to do it in ten minute windows. Try to start the download eleven minutes after visiting the page and the download link will not be active any longer.
The other big "con" is that total connections seem to be very limited. Want to download a couple of things in a ten minute window and continue to browse the site while you're doing it? Tough. I had two videos downloading simultaneously, using four segments each, and the site slowed to a crawl. Clicking on a model's scene took me to the page, but the thumbnail images wouldn't load. Reducing the segments to 3 per download didn't help. The thumbnails still showed the blank squares where they should be, but no images were inside. The "loading" indicator for the page was still spinning, though, so it's definitely trying. After a couple of minutes I reduced the segments to two per download and waited. Nothing. I finally reduced it to one segment per download and, after nothing happened on the original page that still shows "loading" per the indicator, I opened a new shoot from the same model.
And the same thing happened with only one segment being used for each of the two downloads. The link opened the page, but the thumbnails never loaded.
The connection was fine and the two downloads were saturating my ISP's download speeds, but nothing would happen on Karup's side while the two downloads were running.
You could open a new model's page and it would pull up her available shoots, but trying to open any of THOSE shoots yielded the same result. Empty boxes of thumbnails while the "loading" indicator spun indefinitely.
Then, interestingly, the first of the two 300MB+ downloads began slowing to a crawl, eventually trickling down to zero and failing. On the bright side, guess what finally loaded after the site dumped one of my two one-segment connections so that I couldn't finish the first download? Yep. The thumbnails finally loaded. So I queue up their zip files and start them downloading. And then, not too long after that, the second video download failed.
Bottom line: Would I recommend? If you want the content, yes, very much. As I said before and will keep saying, paying the subscription fee, constantly babysitting for ten minute intervals, and repeatedly dealing with the irritation and frustration of the site is the only way to legally acquire the pictures and videos, right? |
|
05-22-18 08:04am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
56
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
|
12-02-17 04:10am
Replies (1)
|
Review
57
|
Karup's PC
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- No ads behind paywall automatically adds five points to total score
- Loads of photos and video available
- Usually two or more sizes available for photos and videos
- Newer video content in HD
- Material is probably exclusive
- Recently began offering three Karups sites for one membership price
- Webmaster is active on PU |
| Cons: |
- Worst download limits I've ever encountered
- Strange photo zip sizes
- Majority of videos are uninspired |
| Bottom Line: |
The good? Lots of content, with sets going back over a decade. Tons of different models. They offer videos, and are filming newer stuff in HD. They've also made changes so that you now get access to three Karups sites with your $30 subscription purchase.
I think the material is probably exclusive, but Karups' content looks the same as ATK's. I'm guessing they use the same studio and photographer, but the same model's photos on each site tend to look exactly alike except for the poses.
Refreshingly, there are no ads once inside.
The bad?
There is no download VOLUME limit, but there are strict download TIME limits. Per the webmaster in the Karups comment section, the links time out after 10 minutes.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=104665
Quote:
"Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. ... We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc..."
And that's very much how it works.
If you want all of an actress' 15 sets and you open the 15 separate pages and click the 15 separate download links, all of the 15 downloads need to start in the ten minutes that the pages were opened. It was also my experience that the downloads were much more likely to finish and not be abruptly disconnected midway the closer they are to the beginning of that ten minute window.
Needless to say, expect a lot of lot of 403 errors where the links are no longer alive. By a lot I mean constant.
"Oh," you think, "I've got a 100Mbps connection, so that's not a big deal." But ten minutes is about the time it takes to download one (1) 7GB 4K movie, isn't it? More relevant is to consider how many hours you're at work, asleep, and doing other things. Take the two or three hours that are left. Unless you want to babysit and check in every ten minutes to make sure your downloads are still downloading, you're not going to be downloading much content from this site after you've paid your subscription fee, and it's by design.
That's the biggie. Little stuff?
Some of the solo videos are okay, but most of the boy/girl and lesbian material is boring, poorly shot, and/or boring and poorly shot. Worse is that many of the fairly recent video clips have substantial interlacing / combing artifacts with movement, and it sometimes occurs even with stationary subjects during slow movement of the camera.
(You've probably all seen the artifacts in videos, but here's an exaggerated example of interlacing problems in an unrelated screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/99cxhw8 )
There will also be weird photo zip sizes where the 1024 option is (arbitrary) 60mb and the 1500 option is 67mb. Or the worse resolution offered in a larger size download. Many of the newer photo downloads will be offered in large and extra large, so you may have the option of a 150mb+ set or a 300mb+ set. That's nice except for the strict download timeouts.
Occasionally you'll find missing download links for photo sets. Not frequently, but often enough to notice.
The older videos are occasionally watchable, but that's forgivable since the site has content going back a decade or more. The newest videos are offered in everything from amazingly oversized 360p clips (500mb+) to 1GB 480p, to nearly 2GB 720p, 3GB 1080p, and 7GB 4K offerings. Needless to say, you're not downloading more than a couple of those at a time. On the bright side, it won't bother you too much because most of the videos are only occasionally interesting unless you like the specific actress and just have to have it for a collection.
Would I recommend? Very much. After all, paying the subscription fee, constantly babysitting, and repeatedly dealing with the irritation and frustration of the strict ten minute download time limit is the only way to legally acquire the content. |
|
05-01-18 08:02am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
58
|
Karups
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Thanks, but I'm not sure that moving the discussion to customer service would be helpful to other users who may be interested in the topic, especially when the pay site being discussed is clearly working as designed. Downloads are intentionally and very specifically designed to fail after ten minutes to discourage paying customers from downloading content, and download managers that queue properly and work perfectly fine at all other sites will necessarily obey these ten-minute download restrictions as designed.
Thanks for the input, and for the willingness to participate on the review site. Would you mind if I post the meat of your PM regarding the site's position on download managers?
|
01-08-18 03:00am
|
Reply
59
|
Karups
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
"Does your download manager require that you provide links of all of the sets/movies that you want to download prior to running it? Or can it be set to open URLs on its own after a movie completes downloading? If so, that seems like it would solve the problem."
I'm not sure I'm following. A download manager that opens URLs on its own before they have been generated to queue into the download manager?
I'm unfamiliar with that technology, but I'd certainly be interested in a recommendation for a download manager that functions that way.
|
12-15-17 10:05am
|
Reply
60
|
Karups
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
So that I don't misunderstand and misrepresent what I'm reading when I write a future review:
I set my download manager to only download one file at a time. I start my first download and queue another download 30 seconds later. If my first download takes 12 minutes to complete then my second download will fail?
|
12-12-17 09:03am
|
Reply
61
|
Karups
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks. I could certainly see a difference in experiences when compared to users that are downloading at 500 KB/s and needing 30-45 minutes for that same clip.
|
12-12-17 08:54am
|
Reply
62
|
Karups
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
What are your internet speeds if you don't mind me asking?
With the ten minute cutoff, I can certainly understand drastically different user experiences for someone on a 25.6 Mbps pipe vs the majority of rural American's on what is regarded as dial up these days.
100MB file at 25.6 Mbps = 34 seconds
100MB file at 2 Mbps = 7 minutes
Ten minute limits would yield huge variations in paid user experiences between someone who can get a set of their favorite actress in that ten minutes, and someone who has to babysit the downloads literally all evening for the exact same set.
(FWIW, I doubt pirates are bothered by any of it.)
|
12-09-17 12:30am
|
Comment
63
|
Karups
(0)
|
|
12-02-17 04:08am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
64
|
Kink.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yeah, I was surprised since I hadn't seen any mention of download limits before, but I didn't re-up when my month ended. I didn't see the point. FWIW, I'd be even more inclined to not recommend the site if it's going to be a crap shoot on how users will be allowed access.
|
08-29-17 06:08pm
|
Review
65
|
Kink.com
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Huge. Even if you don't care about half the network, there's still tons of content.
- Good quality video
- Some storylines here and there.
- Big name and unknown models
- No constant logouts and re-login demands. Thanks, webmasters. Unfortunately, it makes the download limits much more obvious. |
| Cons: |
- Strict download limits. Maybe not technically, but very much a thing.
- Lots and lots of wrestling. That may be pro to some.
- Pretty specific niches that aren't going to appeal to most.
- Lots of tattoos. It fits with the theme, I guess, but it's unusual to find models without them. |
| Bottom Line: |
You've probably heard of Kink, even if it's just as a mental note to avoid. It's an enormous site. Like I said in the pros section, even if you don't have any interest whatsoever about half (or maybe even three quarters) of the content, there will still be tons of stuff for you to investigate.
The pros are pretty obvious. It's one of those binary sites that people are either going to say "yes, I'm going to join that eventually" or "nope, get me outta here." With that in mind I'm going to deal mostly with the drawbacks.
I was surprised to find lots and lots of rasslin. That might be a big draw to some, and if so then join right now, but it's a safe bet that if you find an actress you like, half or so of her scenes will be wrestling. That's fine if you're into it, but it begins to feel like filler after a while.
Tattoos seem almost tame here, but you'll see lots and lots of tattoos. Matraisse Madeline, a lovely dominatrix who has a great deal of work here, has them on her biceps now, which I personally think detracts from her very, very classic beauty. Oh well. That's fashion these days. Whatever floats your boats.
There are thumbnails that will be under an actress' page that you'll click and realize you can't access without paying more money at another site. Please stop this nonsense, webmasters. When customers who paid to view content at this site need to pay somewhere else to view content that is presented as available, those customers aren't excited and happy to learn that the thumbnail they just clicked will cost more money. If you insist on bothering members with ads behind the paywall, put the ads in a separate section that requires additional clicks. Don't pretend something is available to your paid subscribers when it's not.
There are traditional (not sneaky) ads in the site after you've logged in and are browsing, too.
And now the main reason for the below-average score.
The site is huge. Did I mention that already? Enormous. Years of content. And you won't be allowed to download jack. Sure, you can get a few movies here and there, but the download links time out very, very quickly. You'll get 403 errors on the next links in your queue after downloading something as small as a 250MB video.
I get the feeling they want to make it a streaming site. Eventually it gets to the point where you just give up. It DEFINITELY gets to the point where you aren't going to renew the expensive subscription for another month.
Webmasters, paying customers want to pay you for your product and to encourage you to make more of your product. Yes, I know there are pirates out there who don't want to pay for your stuff, and I'm guessing your approach is an attempt to limit that, but I'd suggest focusing more on people who want to, and will, give you money, because we'll just quit paying after we discover the inconveniences placed only on people who want to give you money. And then we'll forget about ever rejoining your site again.
Worse, we'll tell other paying customers how bad the experience was, and other paying customers will reconsider giving you their money, too.
Bottom line: Lots of content, but unless you're into streaming it's too much of a PITA. |
|
08-28-17 07:53pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
66
|
Lane Sisters
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Majority of clips are available in HD
- Photos available for some sets
- Download managers work
- Twins. Interesting fetish material, but nothing THAT kinky, you perv. |
| Cons: |
- No longer updating
- Comical "we could not find this photoset" errors when you go to view some photos.
- Like most openlife offerings, they pad their site with BTS/Interview filler clips. |
| Bottom Line: |
The good: There are over 100 video clips. There are lots of behind the scenes/interview videos, but there are also a lot of boy girl and girl girl clips, as well as masturbation.
The Lane sisters are attractive young ladies, although you'll need an interest in attractive young tattooed ladies to spend too much time with them these days. BUT, I suppose one advantage (?) to no longer updating your site is that all of the photos and videos apparently took place before whichever sister got the sleeve of tattoos done.
This is apparently one of the rare Open Life Network sites that offers most, if not all, of the content in high definition. I didn't click every video, but I grabbed samples sorted by date through the entire site and it appears that the majority are offered in HD.
There are some irritations. It *IS* an openlife site, after all, and what did you expect? The most obvious is having behind the scenes clips for the shoots that aren't offered on the site. And it's extremely obvious when it's the most recent video. Yep. The very first video when arranged by date is an outtake from a clip you can't view.
Pause to think about that for a moment.
The most recent video is a behind the scenes clip from a video that isn't offered anywhere on the site. And the site is no longer updating, so it's probably been sitting there as the most recent clip for two or three years.
The site is often broken. When clicking on a random photo set to check the quality and zip availability, I was led to a page that said the photoset couldn't be found. Good luck if that's the material you're interested in.
There aren't really that many videos. If you're on a fast connection I'd be surprised if it took you more than a couple of days to grab everything you wanted, even in HD.
Bottom line: If you're a HUGE Lane Sisters fan, and if you can get past the broken website, and if you can not be bothered by a complete lack of updates, and if you can keep your expectations in check, and if you find it for $5 or so for a month, it might be worth joining. |
|
12-12-17 08:50am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
67
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
I think it's an appealing site in part because ANY pubic hair on attractive models has been such a rarity for so long. I'm glad to see that bush might be coming back into style.
|
03-10-19 12:23pm
|
Review
68
|
Love Hairy
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Low price for specialized interests
- High quality images of beautiful women
- Download managers work |
| Cons: |
- Ads inside the paywall. Not so much ads, but camgirl stuff. Which are still ads.
Nitpicking:
- Overall size of the website?
- Not every single image set is enormous with amazing resolution? |
| Bottom Line: |
Love Hairy is a sort of “best of” compilation site of Metart, Errotica, and other sites under the Metart umbrella that give collectors with specialized interests access to their particular flavor of beautiful women. And it’s great.
The site offers pages and pages of beautiful young women who are groomed but not shaven. I didn’t see any scary legs or bizarre hairy nipples. I only saw one or two models that would probably be considered “dyke”-ish. The majority of the models, and sets, are of women who just happen to look like actual grown women down there.
There aren’t many with underarm hair or stubble, but every so often you’ll happen upon one. Interestingly, the women are often so attractive that it’s not all that disturbing even if you don’t generally care for that sort of thing. Seriously, click through and find one and ask yourself if you’d shun her advances, refuse to sleep with her, or consider it a deal breaker in real life in any meaningful way.
Most sets offer multiple sizes of .zip files to download, with some of the more recent sets’ largest option being absolutely huge. There are occasional videos as well, but the photos are where the site really shines.
The online viewing of photos isn't my favorite, but I guess old-fashioned pages full of fast loading thumbnails you click to go to another page where the image can be viewed is, well, old-fashioned. Still, I would much rather have the option of choosing it over a site with thumbnails that you click and some sort of script puts the image in front of the open page of thumbnails until you close it. I know that's the direction everything has gone recently, but I don't care much about an "experience" when looking at nekkid pictures. The means of viewing them should be intuitive, fast, transparent, and un-annoying, and the modern flash/java/whatever approach often isn't.
My other gripe is the cam girl advertisements. They're at a point on the screen where you'll often drag your pointer across them and THEY'LL pop out to cover the content you actually want to see. A minor gripe but still one that should be mentioned.
Regardless, it's well worth the $8 if you have any interest in photos of beautiful women who don’t shave everything completely bald.
WEBMASTER:
May I suggest some similar sites for tanlines? How about freckles and redheads? I bet the tanlines one would be a decent draw, and I would suspect you have a thousand or more sets that would apply when you think that even the slightest bikini line would equal content. I’d definitely pay my $8 for it. Heck, I’d pay $10 for it. :) |
|
03-03-19 11:18am
Replies (2)
|
Review
69
|
MetArt
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- The obvious: Beautiful models.
- Easy to navigate, easy to use.
- No download limits that I encountered.
- A surprising number of models with very natural tan lines. I'm going to type it again just because they're so attractive and I'm surprised no one has started a niche site based on them. Tan lines.
- Not the same setting for every model. FWIW, I didn't recognize any repeats.
- Very few, if any at all, fake breasts.
- Did I mention tan lines? |
| Cons: |
- Aliases for some well-known stars.
- User tags not as complete as they could be.
- Pretty limited in age, color, and body type.
- Naming is a bit odd. Lots of single letters after first names to differentiate from models. Made up example: Lori B., Lori G., Lori H., and Lori L. Not a big deal, but noticeably unusual. |
| Bottom Line: |
For perspective, my average site rating is 77 and the best score I've ever given is a 91.
I decided to finally see what all the fuss is about, and I'll be damned if the site didn't live up to its reputation.
Know what you're getting into. It's not hardcore. It is gorgeous women photographed well by people who know what they are doing.
This is the first time I think I've really experienced a hydra. A very, very pleasant hydra, but a hydra still. You can click to look at a model's set, and either the "previous set" or "next set" thumbnail will show a different model's scene that you're going to click on to look at, too. And then it will happen again with that set and another model. And again. And again. And again.
Most websites find you browsing through multiple scenes to see the ones you DO to view. This one is the opposite. You'll realize that you are having trouble finding sets you DON'T want to see. Word of warning: If you join, you won't just be a member one single time. It might not be month-to-month, but you'll probably be joining this site again.
Beautiful models. Not "hey, those are beautiful models for an adult site," but beautiful in the women-in-general sense. I prefer older women, but there's no denying that almost every single model would turn heads in any room she entered, and more than likely be the prettiest one there. Even the models you decide to skip over are attractive, and if the skipped-over one were to approach you at the beach or grocery store (much less a bar) and began chatting with you and showing even the slightest bit of interest, then you'd do your best to see her again. And she's one you'll skip over on the site.
Every shoot I saw had small (10-ish mb), medium (50mb or so), and large (80-500mb) zip files, and the images can also be viewed on-screen with a choice between small, medium, and large as well.
Did I mention tan lines yet? It's indicative of why the site is so good. It's not simply tan lines, but all-over tans, pale skin, hairy pubic areas, completely shaved, etc. It's so great to see different women look like different women.
Everything isn't perfect, though. Letting users add the tags is a pretty inefficient system. While "sexy", "gorgeous", "pretty face", and "perfect 10" are nice, they're very subjective and not extremely useful. Very basic tags from the photographer/webmaster like curly hair, brunette, lingerie, etc. would be appreciated since the tags can be clicked on to pull up any other set that has the same tag.
There is very little ethnic variety, and is 95%+ beautiful white women. That's not a big deal for me, but if you prefer women that are more towards the darker side of the spectrum be aware that you're not going to find too much variation here.
You'll recognize a few stars here and there (the lovely Lorena Garcia comes to mind, and I was very glad to see her), but for the most part it's unknown amateurs.
I didn't download or otherwise investigate the videos at all so someone else will need to give input on that, but I have no reason to suspect they're anything other than superb.
Bottom line:
A great site. If you have any appreciation for the female form, join. Will I join again? Definitely.
Webmaster: Do you run (or does anyone else know of) a MILF website with similar photography? Anilos is great and I've been a repeat member off and on for years, but there's a definite difference in styles and I'd really like to see some older women handled with Met Art's artistic approach. |
|
08-13-16 09:17am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
70
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
blueron's Comment
From their "join" page:
http://imgur.com/7VFifJf
"Unlimited HD Streaming". Yay, except for those of us who don't care and/or who don't have the connections to support it.
They were on my radar to join in the next month or two, but no downloads is complete deal breaker with other high quality, download-friendly, and fairly interchangeable sites like RK and NA being available for similar prices.
Good luck, Mofos.
|
08-24-15 08:17am
|
Comment
71
|
Mommy Blows Best
(0)
|
|
06-27-12 06:32pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
72
|
My Dad's Hot Girlfriend
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Attractive women in nice clothes doing naughty things
- Big names, high production values
- Apparently very easy to cancel when you realize what they did to you |
| Cons: |
- The only one that matters: You aren't really subscribing to the site
- No more network access = tremendous reduction in value
- Downloads often wouldn't complete
- Downloads time out |
| Bottom Line: |
AVOID AVOID AVOID
Here we are again for this week's warning to anyone who might be surfing the internet looking for reviews or discounts and happen to click upon pornusers with some interest in this Naughty America site. DON'T DO IT. I can't stress this enough. Don't join this site right now because it's not what you think it is. Avoid any Naughty America site right now because they are in the middle of, well, I don't know what they're in the middle of. F*cking up their subscription model to the point where long-time users are cancelling their memberships? Yeah, that'll work. Let's say that.
Yes this is a full stand-alone site now. Yes there are promises of those good looking women doing exactly what you expect. Yes they are filmed well. Yes there appears to be a substantial amount of material. Yes the recent stuff is presented in high definition. All that is technically true.
BUT:
Naughty America has implemented a new scheme whereby you "join" a site in order to be allowed to upgrade to get the content of the site. Does that make sense? I'll try to re-phrase it using a different consumer product in case it's unclear. Let's see... Okay. Here's one: You go to McDonalds. An employee meets you at the door to take your order. You order the McWhatever Value Meal and give them your money. The McDonalds employee takes your money, thanks you for your purchase, and lets you inside. Once inside you walk to the counter and are immediately given yesterday's chicken nugget, two french fries from last week, a cup of mostly melted ice, and an expired pack of mustard. You explain to the cashier that you already ordered and paid for the McWhatever Value Meal, and the cashier smiles and tells you no, you paid the door charge to come in and order the McWhatever Value Meal, please enjoy sampling some other items on the menu, and now would you like to order the McWhatever Value Meal for another similar charge to the one you already paid at the door?
Don't do it. I know it's tempting. I know the network used to be great, but it's not that place anymore. Go read the forums and see for yourself. Saturday 9-15-18, quote:
" I paid $4.95 for a trial only to find out I could only access 8 VR videos. I decided to upgrade to a FULL account and paid $71.40 and now I can't access ANYTHING! EVERYTHING IS LOCKED! Even the videos I had access to during the trial."
AVOID AVOID AVOID |
|
09-18-18 02:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
73
|
My First Sex Teacher
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Multiple download formats
- Good looking women in professional clothing
- High production values |
| Cons: |
- Most of the current download sizes are too large for the quality
- Downloads fail a lot.
- Lots of fake tits and goofy looking lip-injected mouths
- The elephant in the room: You get access to this month's videos with your membership fee
- Oh, and the site isn't part of the larger network anymore. |
| Bottom Line: |
NO LONGER A CLONE SITE
Now a glorious stand alone site that offers all of this month's videos! Hooray! Wait, this month's videos? That can't be right. Why in the world would I pay $20 for eight videos?
We'll get back to that in a moment.
If you are looking for a site that caters to your imagining that there is a well kept, nicely groomed, nicely dressed, gorgeous nymphomaniac MILF teacher out there just waiting to take advantage of you, then this WAS the site for you. It's not anymore, unfortunately. Yes the videos are - technically - all there, but you can't have them. You just signed up for access to pay another fee to access the videos that are older than one month. Do you follow?
Put another way, Naughty America now expects users to pay an initial fee to get into their site in order to pay *another* fee to access the content. What used to cost users $20 for complete access to the entire network now costs over $1000 to replicate.
Go read their forums. They're open to the public. The funniest suggestion I've seen is that Naughty America is actively engaged in helping users quit their porn habit.
There are hundreds of videos here, but you can't access them with your membership fee. You can only get the first month's, which, as of 8-2-18, appears to be eight videos. In fairness, you also get other Naughty America sites' videos for that month, so you might have access to 50-70 or so total videos. But I'm assuming you were interested in the ones you thought you were actually paying for on the site you signed up to view.
That? Yeah, that's still eight videos.
Avoid. Don't get tricked by this deceptive approach, and don't encourage this business model with your dollars. |
|
08-02-18 02:33am
Replies (2)
|
Review
74
|
My Friend's Hot Mom
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Gorgeous MILFs filmed well
- Lots of videos available for download (ha, fooled you!)
- Multiple download options
- 4K resolution |
| Cons: |
- About those videos available for download...
- Downloads fail often
- Downloads not only fail while you're downloading, but the links time out often. Don't expect to use download managers to any effect here.
- Lots of fake breasts.
- Tons of ads. |
| Bottom Line: |
MOST IMPORTANT: NO LONGER CLONE SITE, AND NO LONGER A NETWORK
If gorgeous MILFs in formulaic action that is filmed competently using good clothing, lighting, and sets is appealing to you, then this is definitely a site that would've been worth pursuing before Naughty America decided to make their bizarre changes to their subscription model. Sorry you missed it. On the bright side, you get to potentially watch the collapse of one of the biggest adult networks in real time.
Myfriendshotmom.com is longer a clone site but now a full-on independent site requiring its own subscription. Not only that, it requires it's own subscription PLUS additional "channel" subscriptions if you want any content ***from the site you just paid to f*cking join*** that is beyond a month old. Seriously. The first subscription just buys you access to be able to buy the rest of the stuff.
Here is the disclosure at the signup page. Quote: "Become a member for this month's new releases."
Did you catch it? Yep. That's their new terms.
So let's see, it looks like... Nine videos. If you join today, July 17th, you'll have access to all the videos from the last month. Nine videos. There are 154 pages of videos listed, and assuming six videos per page, it looks like the site has well over 1000 videos with the oldest going back to 2004.
But your subscription will allow you access to nine of them and whatever other videos were released that month on the rest of the network. So expect 50-100 videos to be available to you, tops. And most of those are going to be on sites other than the one you joined. If you want more than that (also known as "an actual subscription to the site you subscribed to") you'll have to buy another subscription because, and I cannot stress this enough, the first subscription was just the entry fee to allow you to pay the second entry fee for the site you thought you were subscribing to the first time. Here's one of the statements on their new pricing policy. Notice especially the next to the last paragraph:
https://tour.naughtyamerica.com/media/you-have-questions-weve-got-answers-1576
I cannot warn you away from this site/network enough. What used to cost $20 or so a month is now $1K+ for the same content. Go read the Naughty America forum before you spend any money. It's open to the public.
AVOID |
|
07-17-18 02:57am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
75
|
My Naughty Latin Maid
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
The content is above average if you can overlook the ten year old resolution, lighting, technology, etc. Blowjob, cunnilingus, missionary, doggy, cowgirl, then cum on tits or face. Standard Naughty America stuff.
I had an annual subscription that wasn't affected by this recent debacle, but I didn't re-up when it expired in late May because very few videos would finish downloading on any of their sites.
And yes, they will do it to an archive site. It's right there in the terms I quoted. Here's a member in the forum on June 7:
"I signed up today, i cancelled a few minutes ago while checking that i have only access to one video.."
https://forums.naughtyamerica.com/topic/34399-how-do-we-warn-people-about-channels/
I halfway think they're trying to help their users give up their porn habit.
|
07-04-18 01:17pm
|
|
