All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
The hotel will not typically have a range of IPs for guests. The hotel likely has a single external IP that's part of a pool assigned to the hotel's ISP. Internally, the hotel's router will use a protocol known as DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) to assign IPs that look like 192.168.X.X on a local network, whether you are using wireless or wired access, the same way your router does at home. If you open a DOS window and type in "ipconfig /all", you will be able to see your local IP, which is invisible to anyone beyond the hotel's router.
If an IP is blocked, for whatever reason, all traffic from that IP is completely blocked. You won't even get as far as being able to input your user name, so the site isn't blocking you personally. It won't have anything to do with you having accessed the site from other locations.
That doesn't excuse 21Sex for having ignored your email, especially if you used the email account with which you subscribed.
|
08-12-10 03:19pm
|
Reply
27
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
I doubt they'll unblock the hotel's IP, since that would defeat the purpose of blocking Hungarian nationals. All users at the hotel share the same external IP. My favourite cam site does the same type of national blocking, but they do it model by model.
But yeah, they could have answered your email. :/
|
08-10-10 04:56pm
|
Reply
28
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
yote78's Comment
Funny you should mention this. In March 2009 I subscribed to Lezcuties and got access to Lezbo Honeys in my first batch of 25 sites. Those weren't clones, and had different content, which I mostly enjoyed. Worked out great for a G/G fan like me. Recently though, I've been looking into rejoining, and now I find that I'd have to join both 21Sextury and PPFA if I wanted access to those two sites.
They're not entirely clones, though. There are 59 sites in all, split up over two networks of 40 sites each. Some sites are available with both networks, and some, like my lez sites are only available on one or the other. If they had one annual mega-subscription for say $150 bucks for the whole enchilada, I'd be sorely tempted, but as it stands, I'll likely just do a one-month snatch and grab on each at some point.
Meanwhile, the restrictions of the trial are mentioned in the TBP reviews of the individual sites, so that shouldn't be held against them, IMO. Besides, the 25 sites they offer for $19.95 would take me a month to wade through, in any event.
|
06-28-10 09:32pm
|
Reply
29
|
Aletta Ocean Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
The whole 21Sextury/Porn Pass for All maze of sites has me thoroughly confused. It's one of the reasons I haven't joined yet, even though there's probably enough content with either group to take a chance. Aletta isn't listed as an included site for either network at TBP, but if you go to Aletta, you see that it is part of "some" network.
Your best chance at getting this cleared up might be to send a note to the webmaster.
|
08-15-10 07:10am
|
Reply
30
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I've always been torn about ALS. On the one hand, there are some very beautiful and sexy models, and on the other hand there are all these insertions I don't care for at all. The last time I was a member there was a very long time ago. Are they still doing that speculum and zucchini stuff?
|
08-10-10 04:52pm
|
Reply
31
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
The Twitter channel is fun.
|
08-10-10 05:24pm
|
Review
32
|
Chat GF
(0)
89.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Beautiful 20-something amateur Eastern European and Filipina models.
- Lots of free(ish) nude shows for members. There's a US$2.95 monthly or bi-monthly US$4.95 charge for unlimited public shows. Multiple shows daily.
- Predictable and reasonable costs for private chats.
- Full-screen mode for public chats.
- Respectful atmosphere for models and members.
- Excellent communication with webmaster.
- Decent translation software (Google?) for private chats available.
- Bonuses available for frequent fliers.
- Web features aren't flashy, but very functional. |
Cons: |
- Public show schedule subject to change at very short notice.
- No full-screen mode in private chats.
- No chat in full-screen mode in public chats.
- Can't tip using deposited credits. Edit: Can now.
- No recordings of private or public chats available. |
Bottom Line: |
This is a softcore chat site. Public shows are closely monitored and there are a number of rules of etiquette attendees are required to follow. Private chats are also soft, but they are not monitored and the tone and content of what is discussed is up to the member and the model.
I have a hard time being objective here. I love this site. It is a very new site, but I’m familiar enough with them after 3+ years that I’m confident in my review. Chatgf's webmaster used to be affiliated with a MAjor soft-core photography site which decided to go in another direction with their chats. Some of the cam models have photo sets and/or movies at that photography site, but they're no longer linked directly.
Registration requires that you ante up US$40(€32), which you can apply to future private chats. Per minute charges vary but the majority are US$2.00-2.50. Models set their own rates and more $ does not mean better. There are a flash movie and stills on each model page, but the best way to check out models are the public shows, which are THE biggest selling point of Chatgf in my opinion.
Payment is made up front, and gives you a certain number of dollar (euro) credits which you may spend as you wish. If you're a fan, you can purchase credits in large chunks and get discounts of up to 12%. In addition, for every 5 shows of US$150 or more, you are entitled to a bonus point. 5 bonus points get you $125 in free credits.
Public shows are great. As soft as they are, most of the public shows are very sexy and always feature nudity unlike free chats elsewhere. There is a tipping option if you decide that you would like to offer the model a token of your admiration.
Now some chat sites require that all the models sit there at their cameras and chat for free with anyone who enters their room. This site is not like that. Some models are on call and you can chat with them right away, with a small delay for preparation. Others post their schedules and you can book an appointment. Minimum chat times are 20 or 50 minutes.
As for language, these are mostly Russian models, with a few Romanians and Filipina models thrown in for good measure. The model’s English skills vary greatly, and so do their levels of engagement with the members. Some use microphones and speak English fairly well and some only type, and others aren't very comfortable in English and keep verbal communication to a bare minimum.
Finally, this site is far more of a "community" site than just about any other adult site I've come across. There's a friendly atmosphere in the public chats, very similar to the one at Pornusers, and members are generally cordial, as long as you treat the models and other members with respect. Some may find the content a little tame for their tastes, but, in the end, I don't find there's anything sexier than the friendly smile of a beautiful and very naked woman, unless it's the smiles of two beautiful and naked women. |
|
07-23-10 02:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
33
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I've been poking around the previews and your comment about Sapphic Erotica caught my eye. I was a member of SE several months ago and recognized at least one set from there on Euro Girls on Girls. Is there a lot of SE content here?
|
07-25-10 06:57pm
|
Reply
34
|
G18 Spot
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I really wanted to like this site, since there are a number of cute Latina models and I like softcore, but I found a lot of the preview content to be pretty uninspiring. It wasn't too softcore for me, so I guess it was just too amateur.
|
07-28-10 06:13pm
|
Comment
35
|
Girl Kiss
(0)
|
|
07-05-13 05:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
36
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's much worse over at Rabbitreviews. All you need to do is post a name and email addy with your comment and rating there. The site was 91/100 there the last time I looked.
Since it appears that people are doing this to get a freebie that members already have access to, they're likely not truthful about the status of their membership, as stated in their reviews.
|
07-26-10 04:26am
|
Reply
37
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
bjajlt362's Comment
Considering that none of the reviews we've seen so far will count toward the ranking, that's a pretty dumb promotion. The other review site that was mentioned is also being spammed even worse than this one, mostly because posting comments is less involved.
|
07-25-10 08:04pm
|
Reply
38
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
This is the 4th review of this site posted by new members in the last 24 hours. I'm starting to think it's not a coincidence.
|
07-25-10 11:01am
|
Reply
39
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
I wish. Unfortunately that's $10.95 each clip, but it requires no site membership. I didn't spring for them, as I found the quality of the more recent clips available to members pretty decent.
|
07-10-10 08:29pm
|
Review
40
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Exclusive content
- Girls kissing is the focus. I like it!
- Progression from clothed to nude.
- Current videos are one file, 35-45 minutes, 500x278, 1.6K.
- Preview Trailer and Q & A movie included with all recent updates. Most also include a photo set.
- Natural, mostly well-known models
- Defaults sub is non-recurring |
Cons: |
- No build-up in scenes
- 500x278 standard are okay, but 720 x 480 cost $10.95 each extra, and it’s still not HD
- Updates are rare-ish (About 1/week in the month I’ve been subbed)
- Plain site design
- Older videos smaller, broken into parts. |
Bottom Line: |
Yeah, yeah, it’s not for everyone. It’s hot girls kissing other hot girls. If nothing about that interests you, there’s nothing to see here. I’m submitting this review mostly to highlight some changes from the most recent reviews.
First of all: It’s not just *kissing* anymore. There is credible full manual and oral contact with genitals and the occasional butt-crack; but you don’t get to *see* it. It’s not hardcore, but it’s not faked either. For a while there were even updates that included videos with everything-but-kissing cut out, but it looks like they gave up on that. I guess you can close your eyes during the cunnilingus if you feel the need.
Another improvement in my book is that movies are no longer all broken up into parts. There’s a decent preview in case you’re short of bandwidth, but you wouldn’t be here if you weren’t a diehard g/g kissing fan, anyway. Oh yeah, and there are pictures now, if you like pictures. And a little Q & A where the girls interview each other, which is cute.
As far as esthetics, I’m not crazy about the scenes starting with the girls in full lip-lock. There’s no introduction or build-up of any kind. No “I’ve missed you, baby”, no “I like your hair”, no “Gee, I’ve never been with another girl…”, no nothing. That would have added 5 points, but it’s a very noticeable omission, in my opinion, and it’s my review.
The biggest disappointment for me was that the “higher” definition movies that were apparently available for a while are now only available as additional purchases. On the other hand, if you’re only interested in two scenes from the whole site (unlikely), you can buy them for less than the price of a single month’s sub.
All in all, it’s totally worth joining if you like girls kissing. Clothed lesbians kissing are a huge fetish of mine. |
|
07-09-10 05:53pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
41
|
Lezboland
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Right you are. I never actually subbed, just put it on my list.
I apologize.
|
06-28-10 07:53pm
|
Comment
42
|
Lezboland
(0)
|
|
06-28-10 03:51pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
43
|
Live Jasmin
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Some sites downsample the video. At MyFreeCams, the site I am most familiar with, for instance, no matter what the resolution of the model's cam, the output is always 320x240. You can resize the video, but the stream doesn't get any better. LJ streams at up to 800x600. Therefore, the same model's video feed will look much better if you are watching her on LJ than when you are watching on MFC.
|
04-17-11 04:55pm
|
Reply
44
|
Met Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
It's not just the hosting that is changing. MET's cams were subcontracted to people who will not be involved with the new site. The new site is affiliated with Streamate.
Yeah, I've been holding off on a follow-up, since this is still up in the air. Originally, the old site was to come down at the end of this month, and now they've given members up to August 15 to spend any remaining credits or buy new ones, using the old met-cams.com site. To me, that means that the response to the new site has been overwhelmingly negative.
All in all, it is nice to see that MET is listening to its members, and wants to keep us happy, even if that means making a U-turn with regards to its cam site plans.
|
06-23-10 05:08am
|
Comment
45
|
Met Cams
(0)
|
|
06-12-10 04:10pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
46
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
04-20-11 07:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
47
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Comment
Just a follow-up. The MET-Cams as I knew and lusted for them have moved on to a new site. There are still cams at MET, but it's not the same anymore.
|
07-25-10 03:13am
|
Reply
48
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Yeah, it's been like that for quite some time. The next day updates are correct, but everything earlier in the month is hit-or-miss. Since you can't access the thumbnails directly from that page, I only ever use it to see who's going to be up tomorrow. It's a little messed up that we need to go to a public page to see what content will be available to members the next day.
They are, however, doing a little work on the website currently, so they might add coming attractions for members, too. Model voting now no longer causes pages to refresh and there's an expanded biography available on the page that displays all the content available for a given model.
|
07-22-10 04:54am
|
Reply
49
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Oh yeah, the chat is still monitored pretty closely. I prefer it that way, to be honest. The models don't have a very good grasp of English for the most part, and double entendres are generally wasted on them. Besides, you can get access to the chats with a trial account and a lot of people attending have a drink or two in them. There's only one chat going on at one time and there are a LOT of people attending some of them. If they didn't keep a lid on the chats, they'd be a zoo.
|
06-08-10 06:01pm
|
Comment
50
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
06-06-10 07:01pm
Replies (3)
|
|