| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The live cams on MET Art are what got me to subscribe to that site a few years ago, and I'm still a member, even though their cam section changed for the worse. I now spend a great deal of time on MyFreeCams visiting with the same models I got to know when they were doing shows on MET Art.
|
05-14-11 06:48am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Other, i.e., all of the above. I really like women.
|
01-30-11 06:46am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Thanks for the link. I liked the Eve's Spell one a lot. Looks like there's a fair bit there to hold my interest. :)
|
08-29-10 07:54am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I really wish there was a decent hypnosis/mind control site. I agree that the stories are usually much better than anything that's currently on adult sites.
Back when Usenet was all that, I used to spend a lot of time on ASSM (Alt.Sex.Stories.Moderated) and RAE (Rec.Arts.Erotica). Some of the stuff was of the nasty CP variety, but there was a lot of quality, too. The best stuff is archived on the web, so I still visit assm.asstr.org occasionally.
Writing decent erotic stories is a lot harder than it looks. Back when I was a know-nothing, no-money teen, my primary source of porn was stuff I wrote myself involving my more attractive classmates, and it was the beginning of my fascination with girl/girl sex. I still, uh, enjoy, creating scenarios in my head involving my favourite models.
I don't go out of my way to read much anymore, though. These days, what I really like are porn scenes and photo sets that have a little story behind them. Viv Thomas is an example of a studio that strikes a good balance by not only having hot action, but establishing a relationship between the characters.
|
08-29-10 06:40am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Both. I like photo sets and videos, too.
|
08-23-10 03:21pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If they're *really* just trials, then they're great. If it's a scam site, then it's a scam site. I would only go for trials listed on TBP, and if anything goes wrong, that will reflect poorly on TBP.
|
08-21-10 06:41am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I voted "other". It depends on the model, and on the level of contrast. On some girls, they can be cute, and on others a turnoff. As slutty says, they're less attractive on more voluptuous models. On younger models, they add to the "innocence" factor. Then again, younger models with smooth skin can look great with no tan at all.
|
08-19-10 04:28pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
I like blogs, diaries, site news and other community features. Twitter feeds are fun, too. I wouldn't join a site just because the model or webmaster communicates a lot, but it's a plus. As far as comments, I would prefer that they be pre-moderated, as some people have poor manners.
|
08-14-10 06:50am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think that it is their interest to support the browsers their customers use most. There aren't that many. I've had far fewer problems with porn sites than I have with many B2B websites.
|
08-10-10 04:41pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The face is most important to me, and the rest follows. Not only can I get a kick out of just looking at two women kissing from the shoulders up, or a site like Beautiful Agony, but in porn generally I look at the models' faces a lot.
If the model's face tells me she's bored, I get bored. If the model smiles, I'm much more likely to smile. If the model is into it, I get into it. It's a rare model whose body is so hot that the face doesn't matter.
|
08-01-10 04:38am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't feel guilty about watching the porn I like, but there are things that have come across my monitor that I would rather unsee.
|
07-30-10 06:47am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have written to complain or report problems if there is a reason, but mostly I've written with compliments and/or suggestions.
My attitude toward the website improves greatly if I get a civil reply.
|
07-28-10 04:09am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
My favourite model sites are either softcore or g/g, so I'm not sure exactly what they'd have me do. That said, I'd heed the call, as long as they covered my travel. :P
|
07-26-10 03:17pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've joined a couple of sites that were no longer updating, but I really liked the content, and figure that I got my money's worth.
|
07-20-10 04:25am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I must have missed John Wayne's porn flicks.
I don't like dubbing, but subtitles can be fun. I liked the ones in Viv Thomas's Sex Tapes movies a lot. I like chatting during sex, and would like to know what's being said.
There was actually a thread over at the VT forums where a Czech speaker took offense at the liberties taken with subtitles. It turns out that in some (not the Sex Tapes movies) scenes, the subtitles were based on the lines models had been given, while the models just ad libbed.
I find it's a shame when Euro girls just moan rather talk to each other. My guess is that's done because too many Americans are offended at having to listen to foreign languages.
|
07-18-10 06:45am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
If it's well done, i.e., not over the top, it could be fun. I like girls chatting casually during scenes.
|
07-16-10 04:48pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I prefer to see everything that was originally recorded, in the proper aspect ratio.
|
07-14-10 06:03pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Poll
I don't think I've ever subbed to a site as soon as I come across it. If I did, I'd have way too many concurrent subscriptions.
|
06-28-10 04:51am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind a couple, especially if there's a promotional price involved.
MET, for instance, has gone a bit overboard with them, though. They put them on just about every thumbnail page now, and they're hard to ignore. I use ABP and it doesn't help with them.
|
06-26-10 09:34pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've yet to submit a review, but I wouldn't include it in the score, because otherwise it mess up the points/dollars calculation.
Value for money should get a mention in the comments, though.
|
06-26-10 09:29pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I went the other way actually, from "No", to "Maybe". It's not something I would seek out, but you never know what a partner might be into.
|
06-16-10 03:30pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've gone for trials in the past, but these days I usually get a one-month sub so that I don't have to rush.
Most of my subs have been through CCBill, and canceling's pretty easy there, but I haven't had bad experiences elsewhere, either.
|
06-12-10 06:28am
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
If I saw Justine Joli (we're talking absolute favourite, right?) in a bar or anywhere else, I'd like to think I would wave and smile and then leave her alone.
|
06-08-10 03:14pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Lookie but no touchie, for reasons already given.
|
06-06-10 05:41pm
|
Reply
25
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I would be less annoyed with 21Sextury, et al, if, instead of making choose one package over another, we could just select X number of premium sites and Y number of second tier sites and make our own package.
Even if they restricted this to multiple-month memberships, it would be a big improvement. This is one of those companies where I enjoy the content, but am endlessly annoyed by the marketing.
|
08-19-10 04:23pm
|
