| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
401
|
Battle Bang
(0)
|
|
02-13-11 10:09am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
402
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
|
02-22-12 06:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
403
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
|
10-08-11 12:21am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
404
|
Big Tit Porno
(0)
|
|
10-24-12 01:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
405
|
Body In Mind
(0)
|
Reply of
nipplestrech's Review
Thanks for this review - this is a site on my radar, and has some models I like. A shame about the download limits! It's really annoying when sites make it more difficult for you. Especially when the folks who would share the files illegally a) would generally be able to avoid these hurdles (directly downloading all pics via a DM); or b) of course just not care about the warning anyway :|
|
05-11-13 11:41pm
|
Reply
406
|
Bopping Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Further to Thomas20's comments, it's worth noting that playback of 4K video is quite an intensive task for your computer, and many, especially older ones, are just not up to it.
Recent motherboard chipsets will drive 4K, but most folk wanting to play 4K video would probably have a separate GPU. So the videos themselves may well be fine.
Re the site itself - great review, it may be worth also checking out some of the others in the same stable - despite previously mocking the name, the videos on Wank It Now are great!
|
07-01-15 05:59am
|
Comment
407
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
|
12-19-12 11:31am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
408
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Good review, Brad - am glad you liked BT, I kind of miss the material since I signed up, so it's likely to be one of my first sites to revisit. Might also check Girlfolio - check my recent comment on it, I'm not sure how different - if at all - the material is?
|
08-10-11 03:17pm
|
Reply
409
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
A shame that didn't fit the bill, Cap'n... granted not all the sets are fully dressed to fully nude, but I figured about half were? Strangely, this site has grown on me since my membership expired, it's probably the one I'm most likely to join again relatively soon.
|
07-09-11 11:37pm
|
Reply
410
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Great review tangub, I guess your findings were similar to mine. I did like the mixture of models there - there are so many sites that concentrate mainly on east European models - who are stunning, but I do also like British and French models, and it's good to see a variety in one place.
|
05-15-11 02:45am
|
Reply
411
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Having recently joined, it seems that recent material is a touch more explicit; some of the later videos feature more touching and I guess softcore masturbation. It's still relatively tame compared to more typical porn, but still a good site with some nice scenes and ideas.
|
05-05-11 03:50pm
|
Reply
412
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Excellent question :)
Looking through the last two months, it leans towards casual: Summer dresses, jeans & t-shirts, sweaters & miniskirts - but also some evening dresses, business suits. It's all quite nice stuff too; not tacky or gaudy. The kind of clothes that girls actually wear.
The sets that don't start fully dressed, have various lingerie and nylons. A couple of sets I liked include one doing housework, starting in a loose white top and panties... that very predictably got wet; another starting with just a sweater and fishnets; the latter getting torn to shreds. All good stuff in my book.
|
04-30-11 07:44am
|
Review
413
|
Breath Takers
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good mix of British, French, US & East European models
- Mostly natural models
- Some nice outfits and plenty of good lingerie
- Some fun outdoor shoots
- High-res pictures and zips
- Good update schedule, 3 sets + 1 video per week
- No daft BGM in videos |
| Cons: |
- Some navigational oddities
- Pictures often not sharp @ 100%
- Some sets and videos a bit too tame |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has been on my list to join for a while, and and April's reduced pricing was enough of an incentive to bump it up. It's a little close to the kind of art-nude material that does little for me; but there's enough material with some context (situations, strips, voyeur etc) to take it into my preferred erotica genre.
The photo sets are good; although the same locations crop up often, there is plenty of variety with some cheeky outdoor upskirt shots and the like. Many feature strips, from fully dressed to completely nude; and when the clothes do come off, there is some really nice lingerie to be found, ranging from cute and girly to sophisticated and lacy.
Lighting is natural, with associated shadows; and a lot of bokeh (selective focus) is used - both really work for me, but perhaps not to everyone's taste.
The content itself is relatively tame; many photo sets feature the models teasing with panties, slipping their hand inside before removing them, but inserting fingers/toys is rare. But perhaps a bit less so than since the last review here - there are some closer shots and some more recent videos do feature masturbation - which for me, is a welcome change.
Videos themselves are HD, and I really like that there is no background music; the photographer isn't afraid of a little silence or rustling sheets, which then - sometimes - gives way to the preferred sound effects of the models themselves as they, er, get to work. The videos sometimes suffer under natural light, but are overall of good quality.
My gripes are minor. Navigating is odd; from the updates list you can view the sets, but not download zips; you need to click through to the model's page then to the set again to find them. And although the pics are 4000px, they are often a little grainy when viewed at full size; this is perhaps the photographer using a higher ISO so as not to use too much lighting. But 4000px is more than enough so this isn't a big deal.
Overall, this is a good site that's just a little - not quite as much as I'd like, but close - more erotic and sexy than some staple art-nudes. As such, I find myself with a similar score to anyonebutme's. |
|
04-29-11 01:35am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
414
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I didn't find it that noticeable - although the images don't quite stand up to scrutiny at full size, they are a little grainy. But no big deal since 4000px is pretty big.
I like it, but does have subtle lighting and frequent bokeh - anyonebutme found some sample galleries at http://www.goldinaraw.com/?p=1
|
04-27-11 04:28am
|
Comment
415
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
|
04-26-11 12:46am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
416
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
What tangub said ^^^ thanks for the catch!
|
04-14-11 01:01am
|
Comment
417
|
Brenin Hurley
(0)
|
|
05-05-12 11:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
418
|
Brutal Fisting
(0)
|
|
06-04-12 03:31am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
419
|
Busty Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Surely bundling in 'Busty Teens' with '18 and Busty' is a bit superfluous? :D
|
09-20-11 11:19pm
|
Reply
420
|
Cinema Erotique
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The price phased me a bit too... although if you join at $30 for two weeks, renewal is only $10/2 months - which is probably inline with TBP's note that updates aren't often. Given the relatively small amount of content, I guess you could download what you needed within that 2 weeks.
One to add to the list, anyway!
|
03-20-11 04:19am
|
Comment
421
|
Cinema Erotique
(0)
|
|
03-20-11 04:05am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
422
|
Classy Cams
(0)
|
|
09-03-12 07:52am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
423
|
Code Fetish
(0)
|
Reply of
bebelover's Review
Thanks for the review, and welcome to PU. I'm keen on this kind of light fetish wear - nylons, boots, latex and the like - so this is an interesting site to be made aware of. A shame the pictures are small, but one to bear in mind!
|
11-09-11 11:32pm
|
Reply
424
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Tangub, thanks for another great review - this is a site that is on my maybe list so it's good to know it's worth a try.
I just wish that more sites would edit photosets a bit more rigorously; not in terms of photoshopping, but just cutting them down in size - a small set where every picture is good is far better than a huge one that you just skim through. (Juliland and Stagg Street come to mind as big winners in that respect)
|
01-24-13 11:42pm
|
Reply
425
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Worth noting that there is a level attributed to each model - nude, topless or non-nude - so be prepared for not seeing everything from all models!
But still, as you say, looks promising; am-glam perhaps?
|
08-31-11 02:42pm
|
