Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Bopping Babes

Bopping Babes (0)

Newbie
80*
mbaya (0) 06-28-15  10:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -New updates every other day.
-561 videos, about 7 minutes each. The site is decent size and actively growing.
-The 2015 videos have 5 download choices with the best quality being 4K.
-The biller is CCBill. Trusted and reliable.
-The models talk to you, but not while they are actually stripping.
-No download limits.
Cons: -The 4K videos did not play in Windows Media Player. They did play using VLC, but with severe stuttering.
-All videos have music that is either hip hop or techno crap. I found this distracting as well as too loud.
-All videos have the same sequence: blouse, skirt, bra, panties. Too formulaic.
-The photos are 1600x900 low quality screenshots. Only 103 photosets compared to over five times as many videos. I saw only landscapes and no portraits. Very uncreative.
-Far too many models are either fake blonds or have excessive tattoos.
-Zero ethnic variety, with only white British models. Other UK based websites include black or Indian models. None from any other European countries either.
Bottom Line: As I discovered “Bopping” means dancing. This website specializes in videos of British women stripping while dancing. Most if not all are porn stars.

The models are all white, with no ethnic variety. On other UK based sites, I have seen black or Indian models and I would expect the same here. There aren’t any from other European countries either.

Far too many of the models have tattoos, which is most definitely not to my taste. In some cases the tats are small and not distracting, but there are many that have so many that it is a major deal breaker. Not hot in my book. There are also a pretty fair number of fake blonds, also not my taste. When you factor in that there are other models that I simply don’t find appealing, you start with 146 models and only about half interest me at all. There are 561 seven minute videos so that leaves about 250 to 300 or so that I like. That is a good number that includes some knockout models who know how to make stripping truly erotic.

The videos are very sharp, with the most recent coming in at 4K. Unfortunately, I could not get these 4K videos to play on Windows Media Player, but they did using VLC, but with stuttering. In all fairness, HD 1920x1080 works for me so I did not care much.

The photos are zip downloadable, but are only screenshots at 1900x600. Only landscapes and not worth saving.

The models strip out of costumes such as nurse, flight attendant, policewoman, construction worker, student, cheerleader, maid, or office worker. Some strip out of ordinary everyday clothes too. Only a very small number strip out of a bikini or other stereotypical stripper clothes. I liked the choices of costumes.

However, the sequence is always the same: Top or blouse, bottom or skirt, bra, panties. An occasional other sequence would have been hotter. There are very few videos that offer any teasing previews, such as showing panties while still wearing a skirt. Too formulaic and the videos could have easily been improved. Typical problem with porn as they get a great idea, in this case stripping, and then the creative process stops.

I like that the models talk to you and even give jerk off encouragement. Nice interaction wit the viewer. I love hearing them talk as you get a break from the music, which is mostly hip hop or techno crap and played too loud.

For me the bottom line here is that the videos that work are excellent, but could be a little more explicit. In spite of the many videos that do nothing for me, many are quite excellent. With updates every other day the site is growing and I would recommend joining in spite of some glaring weaknesses.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Thomas20 (0) Try the k-lite codec pack, full version (it is free). I have got the 64 bit version but each comes with some sort of in-built player. If you right click a file, then hover on 'open with' and you will see along with windows media player etc. a program called MPC-HC or similar with a little clapper board icon. That plays the 4k files off one of this groups sister sites so probably also the site you were on.....

K-lite is a genuine and decent program. But be really careful when you download the k-lite pack as the page is loaded with malware programs (with the health alert virus attached to one of them which is a proper bastard) designed to look like your supposed to click them to get the k-lite pack. You don't.

Thomas.

06-28-15  02:18pm

Reply To Message

2

Capn (0) Sounds very interesting.

Nice to see new activity in the niche.

06-29-15  04:22pm

Reply To Message

3

otoh (0) Further to Thomas20's comments, it's worth noting that playback of 4K video is quite an intensive task for your computer, and many, especially older ones, are just not up to it.

Recent motherboard chipsets will drive 4K, but most folk wanting to play 4K video would probably have a separate GPU. So the videos themselves may well be fine.

Re the site itself - great review, it may be worth also checking out some of the others in the same stable - despite previously mocking the name, the videos on Wank It Now are great!

07-01-15  05:59am

Reply To Message

4

Thomas20 (0) REPLY TO #3 - otoh :

'the videos on Wank It Now are great!'

Otoh is correct !

07-09-15  10:49am

Reply To Message

5

Thomas20 (0) Meh. Ignore what I said. What I thought were the 4k files aren't. The 4k ones stutter in the player I mentioned and I can't get them to play in VLC at all. They also won't feed to the TV which is networked to the pc. So Otoh is right on this issue as well !
07-13-15  03:44pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.