Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models on the planet!
The site is HUGE!
Spectacular imagery and sets
Dozens of outstanding photographers across Europe
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Excellent search capabilities
Excellent navigation and "window" management
Excellent range of photo and video resolution
Download speeds are consistently fast.
Customer service that ANY on-line company would be proud of.
Cons:
Only one thing in the CON category:
Too much cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
Bottom Line:
I noticed there were no current reviews of this site so I thought I would write an update to a review I wrote two years ago.
I've been a member of this site off and on for over a decade now and am a loyal, permanent customer. It is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period.
Navigation is also very good and the way the site opens tabs for sets and individual images is the best I've seen. I've actually used this site as a reference to other webmasters with sites that have mediocre navigation.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. Many are well known European models but many are women you've never seen before but will want to see again and again. The girls are almost entirely all natural. The images you see on the main page and tour are perfectly representative of the images in the site as are the scores of the models (over 150 legitimate 9+ models).
To be clear here, this is a SOFTCORE site. If you enjoy looking at incredibly beautiful naked women positioned in ways that tastefully show off their assets, this is a great site for you. The site is mostly solo sets with a few two-girl sets and an occasional masturbation set. Sexy, but no sex. If you are looking for hardcore, insertions or kink of any kind, you will need to look elsewhere. Pretty much the only gaping here will be your mouth just before you say "Oh my fucking god this girl is beautiful"....and you will say that a lot!
There is really only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. Met Art is part of a pretty big network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives, Erotic Beauty and a few others. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each of these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the individual owners want to maximize revenue. What I find a little annoying is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, although there may be more of this model on Met-Art, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model exist. Since I first mentioned this a few years ago, I have seen a few other networks that do it but some of those are all inclusive networks with free access to the other sites. There is always a link on the top of each page that will get you to the models "profile card" within Met-Art (just click on the model's name), so after a while you will learn to ignore these links at the bottom.
Now, in-spite of that cross-selling tactic, the guys at Met-Art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join Met-Art, sometimes providing significant discounts, as low as $5-10 for a month for each site. To be fair, these sites have their own flavor and plenty of unique sets. And pretty much every site on the network is the same or nearly the same quality as Met-Art, although some of these other sites are considerably smaller.
Oh, and here's an interesting one. They have a cam site called MetCams.com. I do not partake in cam sites very often but browsing this one brings up several of the top models that are showcased on the Met-Art site. A few years ago I, um, came across Mila I., one of my all time favorite Met-art models, on the cam site and I could not resist. She did not disappoint, I was completely satisfied and I have a memory that (oddly, I admit) rivals a few from high-school. Clearly, the cam site is not soft-core....
I also want to say that the customer service for Met-Art and their network is simply outstanding. They are very responsive and have cleared up billing and other questions/issues immediately whenever I have had to contact them.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I have an annual membership and have joined nearly every one of the other sites in the network for at least a month. This site and every other site on the network is totally, completely worth subscribing to.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models ON EARTH!
Spectacular imagery and sets
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Good navigation
Cons:
Only one thing in the CON category:
obnoxious cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
One minor annoyance: The user defined keywords are not particularly useful.
Bottom Line:
This is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period. Navigation is also very good.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. FOr example: Mila, with 44 sets, always looks like she is enjoying herself. Fergie, with only 16 sets, is a little more conservative but can melt ice with her looks. Wait...loking at the site while writing a review can be very distracting....
OK, there is rally only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. It seems that Met Art is now part of a network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives and Erotic Beauty. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each oif these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the owners want to maximize revenue. I can even appreciate that some owner/photographers hire a model for a day or a weekend trip, shoot many, many sets and then break the sets up over multiple sites, again, to maximize revenie (Met-Art and Met-Models, now Erotic Beauty, comes to mind) What I find offensive is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model supposedly exist. It is one thing to list other sites on the model page, but it is simply obnoxious baiting to put a clickable image of the model at the bottom of the page and only include a small reference to the name of the other site. This is the only site I've ever seen that uses this relatively deceptive practice and I absolutely hate it. (Can you tell?)
Now, in-spite of that trashy cross-selling tactic, the guys at met-art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join one. And, to be fair, these sites appear to have plenty of unique sets spread around to each of the sites.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I come back every year and will probably succomb to the cross-selling and try one or more of the other sites...and will review them when I do, of course!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is the second best site in the Met-Art network behind Met-Art itself. Very large volume of high quality images of truly beautiful women in natural indoor and outdoor settings. See details below.
Cons:
Nothing much in the way of cons as long as you remember it is a nude modelling site. No hardcore here!
Bottom Line:
This site rates up there with the best nude photography sites on the Internet. Tons of photo sets (not much video, though), many, many different models of all shapes and sizes. The collection dates all the way back to 2004 and even the stuff from back then is top notch. And many of the models you know now were on this site before they were anywhere else...although sometimes with different names. With 10 YEARS of stuff, it is a lot of fun looking. (At least 1 new set a day, 50 images per set, that's 3600+ sets and 180,000 imaegs!)
Navigation is good for a site this large. You can search by model or rating or month. Images appear in the same tab, though, so remember to go back rather than close (I wish they would make this more consistent across the Met-Art network..)
Small, medium and large zip files are available for every set since 2004 (although "large" wasn't that large in 2004)
The girls all appear to be comfortable with the photograper. There is a really good mix of full body and close up shots here and, unlike many similar sites, most of the girls are not shy and don't mind, um, showing us the money.
There is a new set every day. Very few of them are continuations of earlier sets and there does not seem to be any common location where the majority of shoots are done. There is a wide variety of photographers and they all have slightly different styles, locations and models. Once in a great while, they will release a much older set, but unlike some other sites, I don't think they are re-releasing anything. For example, a set came out earlier this year of Marketa when she was relatively young. The set may have been 8 years old, but it had never been released anywhere before as far as I could tell. Contrast this with DDG or Earl Miller, who fairly consistently re-release older stuff.
All sets come in 3 sizes ranging from small to extra-large but the size depends on the age of the set. Recent images are 6000x4000 or so, large enough to be lifesize if printed out at 72dpi. And most images actually look good at that kind of resolution.
Now, if you are looking for ANYTHING other than straight images of unbelieveably beautiful girls, then this might not be the site for you. There are a very few lightweight girl/girl scenes, but there are no sex scenes, no insertions, very little masturbation, no true sex on this site. There may be a few unusual sets from prior years (maybe a girl with her hands tied or something), but this is a 99.9% nude girls site.
I got in this time on a discount because I was a member of Met-Art. Once in Met-Art, it was just $12.50 to join additional sites in the network. Well, I'm dropping the lesser met-art network sites but will keep this one for at least another month or two.
As I mentioned above, overall this is one of the best nude photography sites on the net. Every time I log in, I find myself surfing the site for an hour or more. I don't think I've ever been dissapointed with this site...and for me...that says a lot.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Still one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Set management is among the best in the business (make-up, lighting, wardrobe, location, atmosphere, image quality and composition are all superb.)
Most of the models are beyond beautiful.
Models are generally not shy, most are quite open and model Eye contact is excellent.
Nice mix of full-body and close-up shots.
All of the models appear to be enjoying themselves!
The previews are highly representative.
Usually one new set or video daily.
All sets are dated
Thumbnails are on a single page for each set. (Thank you!)
Redesigned site provides excellent design and navigation.
Cons:
Not much to list here...I have to dig deep to find things:
Browsing is single thread from updates page to model-set page to individual images. No new windows for sets, thumbnails or images.)
These are all REALLY minor things, though.
Some might not like that there is no comment section for each model, but seeing how that tends to get abused at other sites, I don't blame the webmaster for that decision at all.
Bottom Line:
I've had an annual subscription to this site for several years, now and have never once regretted it. Gorgeous models, really well done sets and excellent overall. Customer service when I contacted them was prompt, helpful and courteous. Billing is
This site has been around since 2003 and the collection is pretty massive. At last count, there were about 328,000 images and over 725 videos. 1 set a day would put it at around 5400+ sets. Older sets are very well done but not quite as revealing and the resolution is not quite as high. (A few sets prior to about 2008 are non-nude or partially nude.) There appear to be nearly 400 models, the vast majority of whom are simply stunning. All of the models are completely natural. I see a lot of sites where the model ratings are artificially inflated to 9. Not here. Here they are nearly all true 9s...or better.
Images come in four sizes both for viewing and 3 sizes in zip files: 1200, 2000, 4000 on the long side. Older sets are at least 1200 and 2000.
As I mentioned above, the sets are excellent. I can't really recall seeing anything I didn't like. The girls are happy, friendly and open. Lighting, focus, composition, etc. are excellent.
This is generally a solo-girl softcore site, but there is a toy occasionally and some of the video sets include masturbation. Girls usually start out clothed or partially clothed but many of the outdoor sets start out completely nude.
Newer sets are usually about 80-120 images each, which is more than many other sites. Some older sets are a bit smaller. Older sets are also a bit more conservative, although the imagery is just is good. Some older sets are also continuations (I.e. 30 shots in one release and 30 more from the same set sometime later), but it isn't enough to be a bother and they don't seem to do that anymore.
Note that many European models have a different name on this site. If you are looking for a particular model, start with one of the global model listings to see if she is on this site. If she is on Met-Art of Femjoy, chances are good that she is here, too.
The videos, which come out about once a week, are probably better than many of the comparable sites in this niche. They break the videos down into 3 ratings: Lifestyle, Sensual and Explicit. The first category might be BTS or travel with a model. Sensual videos are bed, shower or similar model showcases, And the explicit vids are just that. You either get a view of every inch of the from pretty much every angle or they are masturbation videos. One main model, Karissa Diamond, has over 700 videos covering all three categories and I'm pretty sure she has video proof that she has gotten naked or gotten herself off in every major city in Europe. Life would be so much mor fun if there were a Guinness record for that....
All sets are properly dated and although there is no flat out recycling, occasionally there are "Director's cuts" that provide a new mix of images from an older set of a popular model. Every set all the way back to 2003 is unique as far as I can tell. The girls in those "new old stock" sets are gorgeous enough for you not to mind at all.
Another really nice thing is that the highest resolution of each image is native. An image displayed in 4000 was actually shot in 4000 or higher. (Occasionally you may find a low-light inside set shot near the ISO limits of the camera, which tends to make the largest images a little grainy, but that's not because of resizing.) Older shots at 1600, 2000 or 3000 were shot in that and not resized. there isn't a single fuzzy or obviously up-sized image on the entire site as far as I can tell! Kudos to the team for that!
About the only negative I can find on the entire site, and it is a truly tiny negative, is the single threaded browsing. No new windows open when you drill down. This is probably to keep the website traffic down, but I prefer the Met-art style where images appear in their own windows. Yes...I can type a key while clicking to open pages in a new window, but it seems like it should be a preference setting. Otherwise, navigation is very good. Once in a set, all images are presented on a single page and you have forward, back, thumbnail and open image in any available size options.
Bottom line: If you like the Met-Art, Femjoy or Watch4Beauty sites, you will really like this one. It easily rates up there with the best. There are occasional specials, but even at $29 it is a good deal and the annual rate of $99 is one of the best annual rates out there. This site gets my highest recommendation.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great model interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not at all shy
Improved site layout and navigation
Token based login (remembers you)
4 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 6000x4000 pixels
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation much better but still a little quirky
Videos are a sometimes bit snoozy
Bottom Line:
This is my third review of this site in about 6 years, and I'm happy to say that, with an improved layout, better file size options and less inhibited models, it is better than ever.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best.
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on the number of sets, but it is now up to about 5000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last 4 years. The pre-2010 sets tend to be a little more "Naked girl in the woods" but for the past several years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in many different poses...standing, reclining, come-hithering, you name it. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Photographer interaction with the model is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward, ugly or uncomfortable anywhere. The photographers here are simply the best in the industry. They start with beautiful women and turn them into breathtaking goddesses. Stefan Soell, for example, manages to regularly find and photograph some of humanity's finest examples of the female form in some of the most beatiful settings on earth. And the other photographers are just as good, providing you with uncluttered, nicely focused, obstruction- free, mostly prop-free views of beautiful, confident, 100% natural women.
Just a reminder that this is relatively soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and a few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want harder core in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views from every angle of great looking models. In the past few years, the sets have become somewhat more explicit. That is a huge change from prior years and adds another level to the awesomeness of these models.
The videos usually follow the pattern of a similar photo shoot. They are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. There are a few close-ups, etc., but there is usually no masturbation. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (480p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
The photo sets typically have about 80-120 images in them and the images can be downloaded individually or in zip files of the whole set. Image sizes in the recent zips range from a now-puny 800 pixels across to a decent poster sized 6000 pixels across. To get the really big images, you have to download the zip file.
Femjoy updated their site layout a couple of years ago and overall it is a huge improvement. Very large set thumbnails include the model name, the set name, the photographer name, the set date and the number of images in the set. The main pages are an uncluttered design with weekly videos on the right, favoriate models toward the bottom and a couple of other sites referenced at the very bottom. There are also pages for just photo sets and pages for just videos. On those pages, you can navigate easily to any month of any year all the way back to 2004. Nicely done. No aggresive partner marketing in your face like so many other sites. There is a search function for models and photographers, a set card for each model and photographer, and a scoring system of 1-5 stars for both the model and the photographer.
The ONLY thing I still have not gotten used to is the in-set navigation. It is much better than before, but there are no options for opening an image in a new window and th eback button doesn't really work. Everything here opens in the original window and if you try to open an image in a new window, some functionality, like image size selection or next/previous is lost. Click on a set and you get nice large thumbnails of all of the images in the set on one page. HUGE PLUS. There is a large X in the upper right hand corner that will get you back to the page you came from. Same with the images. The first time you select an image, you get the smallest size until you chose a different size, then the site remembers that size but only for the current set. And the X in the upper right corner will take you back to the previous page, but it takes you to the TOP of the previous page rather then where you were. A little inconvenient if you are looking at images at the bottom of a set or a set thumbnail at the bottom of a page.
OK, I'm out of room....
Bottom line? If you are into medium-soft core and like young, showy, confident, OMG beautiful young women, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content and good pricing. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months. I will have a subscription here until either the site or I are no longer around.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality video and photos of sex scenes and solo scenes. Many Met-Art models but a lot less tame.
Excellent production quality.
Excellent navigation.
Part of the Met Art Network so you know what to expect.
Terrific customer service.
Excellent download speeds
Multiple image size and video file formats
settable user options for navigation and viewing (like Met Art)
All sets are named and dated.
Cons:
Really very few.
Marketing for the webcam partner is very prominent and the auto-dropdown for this is truly annoying.
They've starting this odd bait tactic called "Staff Selection", where they insert a preview video in prominent locations (it looks just like a set). You click on it and discover it is only a preview. Then they want to SELL you the video separately from your membership. The ad for the most recent video-for-sale shows up on every single set listing page. I truly hope this dies quickly. The videos are no different from other Met-Art network videos and this practice is so annoying that it makes me want to quit the site.
Many of the sex videos are highly stylized. (surreal as opposed to real)
Many of the solo models lose eye contact with the camera when they start getting into themselves.
Bottom Line:
As a frame of reference, I am a very, very long term member of Met Art and a couple of other sites in the network, but I recently realized I have not been a member of Sex Art since 2012. I'm happy to say a lot has changed on this site since 2012!
The site uses the tagline "Erotoc Cinema for discerning adults" but there are far more image sets than there are videos. For me, that isn't a bad thing at all.
As others have said, this is Met Art, only harder. Here you will find nearly all of the models you would see at Met Art, except here the no touching, no fingering, no inserting, no spreading, and no boy-girl fucking rules are gone. Many of the models are still just solo, but they are much more open. Much.
Somebody mentioned back in 2013 or so that they were doing anal on this site. I did not notice any Anal scenes and a search for anal only brought up a few things from 2013. I don't really care for anal so this is a good thing on my list. Just so you know...no anal here.
If you are a Met-Art subscriber, have you ever clicked on a thumbnail because the image looked great only to find that the lower half of the model is completley out of focus? Well, that sort of depends on the photographer but I can tell you that here it doesn't happen nearly as much. Many of the images here are sharp from head to toe and every bit as good, sometimes better than those at Met Art.
The models, of course, are Met Art quality, top notch European models. Nearly all are in the 18 to 25 category. Generally slender, some are curvy and some are OMFG gorgeous. They seem a little more playful here with a little more eye contact. And when you throw in that these sets include a lot more shots of, for example, fingering, spreading and generally open labia, then this site becomes a lot more pleasant. Many of the girls do tend to forget about the camera when they start getting into themselves, though. This is fairly common for models that are not full-out porn stars.
The videos are sort of a mixed bag and I'm not entirely sure why. Met Art in general tends to stylize their videos and many of these are theme based. The sex in many of these videos is ok, but it doesn't draw you in and hold you like more hardcore stuff can. (There are some notable exceptions, though, where the guy just bangs the hell of the girl like there ar no cameras at all...and it is really good.) Some of the solo scenes are also very good, starting with a stroll down the beach or something and ending with a vibrator induced orgasm with a lot of close-ups along the way. Is it real? Who cares! It often looks pretty real! The girl/girl scenes are also much more realistic, with the girls clearly performing acts on eachother, as opposed to just holding hands and looking like they are sisters, again with an ample number of close-ups along the way.
Here are some quick stats (from what I can figure): As of 2/23/18
895 videos
1,259 photo sets
549 models
49 photographers/videographers
One new set every day.
As far as niche, that is difficult to define. I would put it in with Watch4Beauty.com or maybe MPLstudios as both of those sites use popular, beautiful Eauropean models and put no restrictions on activities.
Bottom line: If you like the models at Met Art but are looking for something a little more open, a little more exposed, a little harder, then this is the site you are looking for. I would say join for a month, but honestly, there is way too much good material here, so take a longer term deal if you can find it. I may add this to my annual subscription list.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Set management is among the best in the business (make-up, lighting, wardrobe, location, atmosphere and composition are all superb.)
Most of the models are beyond beautiful. Some could stop a 747 in mid-flight!
Models are generally not shy.
Model Eye contact with photographer is generally excellent.
Nice mix of full-body and close-up shots.
Outdoor sets are the best I've ever seen (no stalking-style girl in the woods sets here!)
All of the models appear to be enjoying themselves!
Navigation, search and voting all pretty good
Customer Service was prompt and courteous.
Cons:
Really not much to list here...I have to dig deep to find things:
A "User settings" option would be nice. (Image size, thumbnails-per-page)
I'd like all set thumbnails to be on one page. Typically you have to click through 4 pages of thumbnails to see all of them in a set.
Navigation could be a little better (browsing is single thread from updates page to model-set page to individual images. No new windows for sets, thumbnails or images.)
Page back sometimes takes you back to unexpected places like the log in page.
These are all REALLY minor things, though.
I had some minor issues with IE-11. Chrome is fine.
Some might not like that there is no comment section for each model, but seeing how that tends to get abused at other sites, I don't blame the webmaster for that decision at all.
Bottom Line:
I promised that I would try again to get into this site and I'm really glad I did. It is simply top-notch. Gorgeous models, really well done sets and excellent overall. Customer service when I contacted them was prompt, helpful and courteous.
This site has been around since 2003 and the collection is pretty massive. About 195,000 images and 395 videos. 1 set a day would put it at around 3600+ sets. Older sets are very well done but not quite as revealing and the resolution is not quite as high. (A few sets prior to about 2008 are non-nude or partially nude.) There appear to be about 250 models, the vast majority of whom are simply stunning. Al of the models are completely natural. I see a lot of sites where the model ratings are artificially inflated to 9. Not here. Here they are almost all 9s...or better.
Images come in three sizes both for viewing and in zip files: 4000, 2000 and 1200 on the long side. Older sets are at least 1600 and 1200.
As I mentioned above, the sets are generally excellent. In fact, I can't really recall seeing anything I didn't like. The girls are happy, friendly and open. Lighting, focus, composition, etc. are excellent.
This is generally a solo-girl softcore site, but there is a toy occasionally and some of the video sets include masturbation. Girls usually start out clothed or partially clothed but many of the outdoor sets start out completely nude.
Sets are usually about 30-40 images each. Some older sets are a bit smaller. Older sets are also a bit more conservative, although the imagery is just is good. Some older sets are also continuations (I.e. 30 shots in one release and 30 more from the same set sometime later), but it isn't enough to be a bother and they don't seem to do that anymore.
The videos, though not as common, are somehow better than many of the comparable sites. I think this is because the girls tend to interact with the camera more. In many of the videos, You get this little "you like?" look once in a while. Why yes, yes I do!
All sets are properly dated and there is NO recycling. Every set all the way back to 2003 is unique as far as I can tell. Some sets seem like they might be a little older, but they are otherwise unpublished. And the girls in those "new old stock" sets are gorgeous enough for you not to mind at all.
Another really nice thing is that the highest resolution of each image is native. An image displayed in 4000 was actually shot in 4000 or higher. (Occasionally you may find an low-light inside set shot near the ISO limits of the camera, which tends to make the largest images a little grainy, but that's not because of resizing.) Older shots at 1600 or 2000 were shot in that and not resized. there isn't a single fuzzy or up-sized image on the entire site as far as I can tell! Kudos to the team for that!
About the only negative I can find on the entire site is the single threaded browsing. No new windows open when you drill down. This is probably to keep the website traffic down, but I prefer the met-art or FemJoy style where either sets or images appear in their own windows. Yes...I can type a key while clicking to open pages in a new window, but it seems like it should be a preference setting. Otherwise, navigation is good. Once in a set, you have forward, back, thumbnail and open image in any available size options.
There is another option I discovered eventually that makes navigation a little easier...there is a flip-book on the lower right side of the main page for each set. You can flip through it to an image you would like to look at and click on that image. When you do THAT a new window opens starting at the first page of thumbnails (not the image or page of thumbnails you clicked on). This little flip-book is actually pretty nice because you can quickly flip through all the thumbnails in a set. Not sure why it doesn't just take you to the image, though...
Bottom line: If you like the Met-Art or Erotica Archives sites, you will also really like this one. It easily rates up there with the best.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
hegre-art.com is a spectacular erotic photography (softcore) site with some interesting and remarkable features. The girls are beautiful and the photography is always stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent, but the signature component to this site is probably the very well done erotic massage and tantra massage shoots and videos. Navigation is generally very good and the images come in a wide range of sizes up to 10,000k. The models are predominantly european, with a few well known US names mixed in. Oh, and the site is an excellent value for the money compared to other similar sites.
Cons:
Couple of small things. First, it is too difficult to get to the larger images for each set and when they load, you cannot move through them because they each load to a separate page. The page-back navigation is a little clunky, too, as it usually does not immediately take you back to where you were before. Oh, and I was completely unable to get the site to work on Internet Explorer 9, although it works fine on Chrome. Something about cookies, I think. Not a hige deal as I use several browsers but it might be for others. Generally, if you can get into the previews, you can get into the site.
Bottom Line:
This site is dominated by really well done single model erotic photo shoots and softcore single-model videos, but most of the models are absolutely beautiful and the photography is among the best on the planet. The models are probably mostly 20-30 with a few really outstanding 18 year-olds. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all shapes, sizes, ethnicities and colors, but generally very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here.) There is full nudity, but many models are conservitive, meaning they don't all do close-ups, spread eagles, etc. There are very few sex scenes and I can't recall a single toy or vibrator on the entire site. There are a lot of beach scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. The result is more of a veuyers nude-beach fantasy than a photo shoot intended solely to get you off.
Perhaps another, much more esoteric way to put it is that this site is like a fine wine store. You can get a great buzz on fine wine, but part of the experience is appreciating the wine as you do. If you are just looking to get drunk quickly, go to the liquor store and buy some mad-dog. If you can appreciate this analogy, this site may be right for you. If not, skip it and go straigth to a hard-core site.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionaly done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. Lookout, though, there are a few of these sessions with men.
Navigation is generally very good, with the option for thumbs, slides or something called journal, which takes all the images in a set and stacks them at roughly screen size.
There are, according to the site, over 200,000 images in 3300 galeries. The collection dates back as far as 2002. The images from that timeframe, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
The site seems to use mostly eastern european models with a few nearly exclusive resident models. Look up Anna S, an apparently French stunner, or Luba, a long-time regular.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want a lifelsize image of Melissa Mendini standing against a white wall in nothing but high heels for the back of your closet door? (assuming you can print it.) Well, here's the place to get it and many, many more like that. The only problem is that you can't get to these large images via the thumbs. You have to go to slides, click through the slides, preview the image you are interested in and then choose the size. You can also go to the journal, wait for all the images to load, then scroll down and choose your size from there. There are, on average, about 6 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for some really beautiful women to look at for a while. I would also recommend this site to anyone who likes Met-Art, or Femjoy.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls here are all absolutely beautiful. If you like Met-Art or FemJoy, you will also really like this site. Although many of the same girls are here, most of them seem a little less inhibited and this is the only place I've seen were so many of them agreed to do sex scenes. Most sets include both images and videos (listed separately under each model's profile) and the videos are not just video of the photo session, they are all well done, dedicated videos. Both images and videos are some of the best quality I have seen on any site. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to dissappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done.
Cons:
Well...yes, there could be a little more content. The site, it seems, has only been around since 2008 or so. But in the balance between really good imagery and volume, I'm pretty happy here. I couldn't find a single set or even an image in a set that was just added to create filler. Quality beats quantity every time in this case. For the money, the site is well worth it.
Bottom Line:
This is a VERY well done site. The photographers and videographers do a spectacular job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create exceptional imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some really excellent videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes. They've managed to tap every single exceptional European and American model. Go look at the model list and you may recognize many of the girls. Most are among the most beautiful in the industry. And, as I said, the crew here brings out the best in them...in every single set. Several of the models look far, far better than I've ever seen them on other sites. Perhaps it is, judging from the fact that many of the sets are in the sun or on an island someplace, that it seems these folks have a decent budget and can afford to take the models someplace really fun for the shoots.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set is good. Select the image size you want, click on the images tab and then any image you click on will open in the size selcted. You can then choose larger or smaller from within each image page (nice feature). Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice.
If you have been to to the top-tier photography sites like Femjoy, Met-art, Met-Models, Errotica-Archive, Earl Miller, Ron Harris, etc., then you owe it to yourself to check out X-art. If it isn't among the top-tier sites now, I sincerely believe it should and will be soon.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site has been around since before 2005!
Excellent selection of top-tier, beautiful models
Exclusive content
Many of the most popular European models with a few specatcular exclusive models.
Several exclusive latin/ethnic models.
Models are open and uninhibited.
Lots of eye contact with the camera.
EVERY photo set has an acompanying video.
Navigation is generally very good
Multiple zip and video resolution options.
Multiple display options.
Available file size is up to 5600k
Most videos are now up to 1080p with some 4k.
All sets, including zips and videos, are uniquely named.
Cons:
Not much here.
Only 1 update every 2-3 days. (15 sets a month)
Navigation could be a little better.
There are a few "unconventional" beauties.
Sets are not dated on every thumbnail screen.
Bottom Line:
This is a mostly a solo girl site but there are a few things that make it different.
First, every photo set comes with a "behind the scenes" video. I'm usually not a big fan of videos taken during photo shoots, but these videos shed a little light on the models by showing personalities and interactions as well as shedding light on the photo shoot process. Any wannabe nude photographer should watch some of these.
Second, the girls in most of these sets are not shy in any way. We're talking legs-spread-so-far-their-toes-are-beyond-different-horizons open. Many of the sets are orgasm sets with spreading, insertions, giant two prong vibrators, etc. This is not Met Art. It's not even Sex Art. It is a place where many of those models go beyond softcore but still manage to look absolutely fantastic. Some of the girl/girl scenes are also very well done. Some of these sets make the girls look like sisters, but a few are really impressive. Clearly these girls are into each other, which makes it that much more interesting to watch.
Third, the photography. It is outstanding. Every inch of every model is in focus. None of that artsy-fartsy old-school soft-focus stuff here. Although they get pretty creative sometimes, you will NEVER see a model dressed like Marie Antoinette on this site. You will never see a set where the lighting is filtered through window blinds so you can't see the model. Every set...every inch...of every model...from pretty much every angle. Damn, that's nice. Now, there are occasionally instances where that is a mixed thing. Sorry in advance for the visual... There is one slender model with unbelievable breasts and an O-ring shaped labia. She actually lactates in one of her videos. Because they don't airbrush anything, you can see that her skin is fairly translucent so you can see veins. It's initally.....conflicting. In the end, the girls assets win and you will still want her, though. OK, enough of that!
Navigation is good, but it could be better. I think it is likely that the site just outgrew it. There are tags, but not user tags and you can't search on them. There are years worth of sets here but you can't, for example, go to the updates from June of 2014. You have to scroll back, sequentially, to get back that far. You can search on models and there is a model bio page for each model.
For sets, you pick a set and the page goes to the set with a cover photo, the video and between 45 and 90 images. Click on an image and it opens in a new "Viewing" window. Click on another image and the "viewing" window changes to the new image. Depending on the size image you chose, you can then click on the image to make it full size. You can always right click and open images in new windows if you want. This navigation style is better than most sites, but it could be improved. It would also be great to be able to more easily view the older material by allowing navigation to specific months. Of course, to do that, every set will need to have a date-stamp.
Oh, there is a blog section that highlights activities, new models and shoots. It can be interesting, but it ussually helps to show you models that are coming. Kind f a tease.
I have had an annual subscription to this site for a couple of years now and it is easily in my top 3 or 4. The site is huge now, so I'm scoring it up there with Met Art, Femjoy, Sex Art, Hegre and MPL Studios. The content is every bit as good as those sites.
I can't quite get a read on site stats because they are not published, but I will make estimates:
2378 sets/videos
about 250 models
I would have scored this site higher except for the minor navigation issues and the fact that it does not update daily. But the quality photography and videography still puts it among my top 3 or 4.
Bottom line: If you like solo models on sites like Met Art, Sex Art, Femjoy, JoyMii, MPLStudios and Hegre and are looking for something a little more hardcore, this is absolutely worth a visit.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful models
High Quality, polished videos
In your face format
Many popular models and porn stars
Some interesting lesbian scenes
Terrific views....
Tons of content (Since 2001!)
Unique tiered payment structure
Cons:
Not much to say here:
Some of the videos can be a bit slow, but the webmasters warn you.
Older vids are not HD (of course...)
Bottom Line:
When I first saw this site, I thought it was about anal. Yep. NOT about anal. It's about taking the best porn stars and models in the industry and showcasing their bodies. And I mean ALL of their bodies...up close and personal.
There is not a single male in any set on the entire web site. It's all about the girls.
From what I can tell, there are over 1200 video sets here, each with between 3 and 6 10-20 minute videos. For the most part, each set starts out with a basic strip segment showing off the girl's usually amazing physique, then there is a close-up/spreading segment, then a fingering session, then a dildo/vibrator session and then one or more sessions that might include peeing, an anal dildo session, a speculum, or just a conversation between the model and the photography crew.
The models here are hot, well built, popular and professional. Lucy Lu is here, Saphira is here, Elsa Jean is here, heck even Melena G is here doing things you would never see her do on Met Art. Yum! If you are somebody who really enjoys amazing bodies, unobstructed views and in-your-face close-ups, this is a terrific site for you.
The webmasters provide a little narrative for each segment, explaining what the girl does and giving a check-mark of approval to those they think are really good. They even warn you if a segment is a little too slow. Nice touch.
Many models have two or more complete sets. To me, this confirms that the girls are treated well by the photography team and that they enjoy the shoots.
Many of the shoots are in local (to the girls, I guess) hotels, but some are in exotic locations.
Lighting, focus, formatting, sets, props, toys and overall photographic/videographic details are excellent.
Oh, there are a few pretty good lesbian scenes, also. The format of these sets is a little different in that the girls are basically showing themselves and each other off for the camera. They are into each other for the most part, but they are basically going look at this girls pussy. Isn't it awesome!..or something similar. Some of these sets are pretty awesome, but some that you want to be REALLY awesome, Like Little Caprice and Melissa Mendini, are a little..awkward. And a few are just a bunch of hot models stripping down for the camera. Eh. Still some great views, though.
Navigation is good, allowing you to see things chronologically or by model. You can also select by model age (??), nationality and shoot location.
The tiered payment structure is worth mentioning. You can get streaming only for $10 a month, I think. Then the pice goes up depending on how big you want your downloads to be, up to 4K for the latest videos. unlimited 1080p downloads is $39 a month, I think.
This site reminds me a little of ALSScan, except that site is much more lesbian oriented and the girls are more into each other than the camera. This site is more polished, more professional...and the overall package puts In The Crack among the top 10 sites for me.
If you haven't figured it out yet, I highly, highly recommend this site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans...all of them are fit.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Mostly studio shoots with minimal props.
Navigation, search and voting (with "likes") are all pretty good.
Extra features of the site include orgasm videos, tantric massage and some "tutorials" that you have to see to appreciate.
Daily updates.
Images available in up to 10000k!
Nearly 300,000 images!
Sets dating back to 2002.
Cons:
The photography, which is about 80% of what goes on at the site, is often studio work shot in a plain, white studio. This is intended to show off the models, which are often amazing, but it can get a little monotonous sometimes.
Bottom Line:
Hegre.com, formerly Hegre-Art.com, is an excellent softcore photography site with some interesting and remarkable features. It differs from a lot of other sites in that Peter Hegre usually just wants to show you how amazing the female form can be. He does this very, very well! The girls are generally beautiful and the photography is often stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent.
This site is dominated by really well done single model photo shoots and softcore single-model videos. Most of the models are stunning and the photography is among the best anywhere. The models are probably mostly 20-25 with a few 18 year olds in the mix. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all ethnicity, often very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here) and generally very fit. (I just looked through the last few months of sets and can not find a single model that doesn't look like she wakeboards or kite-surfs....translation...not an ounce of fat on any of these models anywhere. Really. None!)
Models are usually completely nude throughout the set, but the shoots are conservative, meaning very few close-ups, spread eagles, etc.
(Although some sets called explicit really are pretty explicit.) The majority of images are full body, natural pose shots. These models don't need a lot of props or pretense. Unlike a lot of other sites, most of these models don't have a bad side or angle. Still.....I do find myself wishing they would turn around if they are going to pose in a crab or bridge position like that....
There are beach/outdoor scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. Again, these are not romps, but more like showcases for the models and the photographer. It isn't ALSscan because it isn't supposed to be.
.....still, even without overt posing, close-ups, etc., there is often something here that will float your boat. Peter Hegre and his staff are masters at showing the bests of the female form. There are a few pretty exclusive models here that are as amazing as any you will ever see elsewhere and some of the sets and behind the scene videos, like Ana S. standing nude near the Eiffel Tower, are simply unforgettable.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionally done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. There are sessions like this with men, too along with some other unusual sets or videos ending with a male-model orgasm.
There are close to 300,000 images in about 4500 galleries dating back as far as 2002! The images from that time-frame, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or print it out for an image that is over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want to line your closet with life-sized images of amazing women just standing there in totally naked splendor. This site is your nirvana, then.
There are, on average, about 4 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for a place to appreciate the amazing female form for a while. It is every bit as good as Femjoy, Watch4Beauty or MPL studios and at its best may be better than Met-Art. ...just take the massage-orgasm videos as a bonus!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nice collection of excellent quality VR videos
Attractive, popular US and European models
Includes a large non-VR network
Includes several female POV VR videos
90% of these videos are particpatory.
Many 2-girl participatory videos.
File sizes are listed
VR videos are dated
VR videos are scored thumbs-up/down with a percentage.
Good file naming for VR videos.
Good download speeds
Cons:
Not many negatives...
Navigation is basic
No photos except representative thumbnail for each video.
Most videos are shot in one position, prone, but there are some notable exceptions.
Most non-VR material in network is not dated.
Non-VR sites not quite as well done as VR site.
Bottom Line:
This review and score is ONLY for the VR site, compared to other VR sites, but I will mention the other network sites as appropriate.
This was one of the first sites I joined when I got my HTC Vive, but somehow in the rush to try things I failed to write a review. I just re-joined the site on a $79 annual membership, which is a pretty good deal considering they publish VR 3 times a week.
WankzVR is a top-notch VR site probably among the top 2 or 3 on the Internet. The additional network is not quite as sophisticated as Wankz VR, but there is some good stuff there as well.
Stats for WankzVR: (as of 2/15/2017)
About 108 VR Videos
About 65 models
Updates every 3 or 4 days
Formats include Gear (H/L), phone (H,M,L), Oculus(H/L), Vive (H/L)
60 FPS typical
Highest resolution is 3840x1920
Typical video is about 45-70 minutes!!
Typical HD file size is very large, about 5-10 gigs. Some are as large as 16 gigs.
All videos are 180 degrees.
3D Video format is Left/Right
About 95% of these videos are participatory (i.e. you fuck her...)
Nearly all of these videos start with the male prone and he stays in that position through out the video with the girl(s) doing all the work. One unique, often pleasant thing to this site is that the girls often get very close to the camera and spread. Other sites spread, but usually not 10 inches from your nose. A few other sites offer "face sitting" but those scenes are considered fetish do not end in sex. Here, the close-up is practically part of the typical strip, show, blow and screw sequence.
The gawker in you will love it.
The girls are often quite beautiful and fit, but a few are just a bit more full figured, nicely curvy. There are pretty much no "mature" models here, which sets the range to the 18-25 up-and-coming porn stars. Make-up is usually well done in an American or Met-Art near-glam but not overdone style.
These videos are acted out a little more than most and always have a story-line of sorts...as much as you can in porn. Leah Gotti has a terrific scene in an acted-out casting-couch-like story. She comes in thinking she is interviewing for a non-porn scene, ends up stripping and getting her lights fucked out (very active scene) and leaves insulted as the guy says he'll call her. In another scene called "Dear Diary, Jackpot!" , two cheerleaders (Naomi Woods and Bella Rose) end up in a competition for Bella's boyfriend. The scene is really top-notch. Bella's jealous glances add a nice touch. These two scenes are probably among my top-10. Come to think of it, there are a LOT of two girl scenes where you get laid by both girls. This is much more satisfying than just watching two girls do each other.
The videos are well done and the sets are good quality but not overly luxurious or distracting. The girls ALWAYS seem like they are enjoying the scenes, which you can see through the acting. I can even say that some of the acting is good. The fact that these guys put together pretty good skits is a good indication that they are all having fun and aren't afraid to try new things. It reminds me a little of Twisty's in that regard.
The rest of the network is also good, but not quite as well done overall as WankzVR. The VR site feels different and is more up to date. The other sites don't all include dates and file sizes. I might do a regular Wankz review a little later.
Bottom line: For VR, WankzVR is a top-notch, best-of-class site well worth the $20 for a month or even $79 for a year! Go check it out!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many of the best models from Met Art
Outstanding photography
Perfect settings and lighting
Sets are usually more revealing than Met Art
Good site layout and navigation
Videos are often not boring!
Models and sets are user-scored
Searchable tags
Cons:
Not a huge site, but larger than many
One update every 2-4 days (usually 2)
No tiered pricing for existing Met-Art network members
No other cons!
Bottom Line:
This site is a satellite in the Met Art universe that is exclusively presented by one of Met Art's best photographers, Arkisi. I can't find any profile information on Arkisi, but he/she is a very, very busy and talented person. The site includes many of the best models from Met Art in really excellent sets. Many of the videos are also excellent, which is often not the case elsewhere in the Met-Art world.
Overall, I'd say that this is 2nd or 3rd behind Met-Art in terms of best within the network.
Some basic stats:
About 720 sets (15 a month since 2014)
About 172 models
Sets range from about 35 to 120 images
Videos are about 6 to 22 minutes
Images come in three sizes 1k, 2k and 4k+
Videos come in several formats from 270p (why?) to full HD in MP4, WMV and Divx.
All sets are user scored and user tag searchable.
All sets are dated
The basic shell is very similar to Met-Art, including a user-options page that allows you to tailor your experience....except the option to open each image in a new page is not present.
The models here are every bit as amazing as they are over in Met-Art, but many models here are a little more...open. There are a few sets insertions and some other things like candle-play. Several videos start out showcase and end up masturbation. I actually joined this site because I wanted to see....um...a little more of a particular, exclusive model and, wow, I was not disappointed. Keep in mind, though, that this is strictly solo and some two-girl scenes. It is up a notch or two from Met-Art, but it is not at all hardcore.
In addition to the popular models, there are a few casting sets and a few sets with models I've never seen before. These might be girls that are popular elsewhere or girls that didn't stick around for one reason or another, I'm not sure.
I'm scoring this one an 90. The site is excellent overall, but isn't quite as large as most A sites. So it got that score based on the quality of material.
Bottom line. If you like Met-Art, do not hesitate to join this site. It is well worth the $20.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Best video quality of any VR site
High-def (4K) 3D VR videos
Mostly Popular, very attractive European models
A few beautiful models I haven't seen elsewhere
Mostly participatory videos
These vids are VERY well directed. Girls that can be so-so elsewhere are AMAZING here.
Very high entertainment level: The girls are into the scenes.
Very fast download speeds
Good navigation
Release dates are posted
Videos are subscriber-scored on a 10 point scale.
Cons:
Still a pretty small site
Some videos are observational (i.e. watch b/g sex)
A few videos start participatory, but switch to observational.
No streaming or previews (minor for this format)
No zip files of photos or captures but a few representative images for each set (minor)
Tags listed with videos are not searchable.
A few girls make a little too much noise but a genuinely quiet compared to some other sites.
Bottom Line:
I just added a few points to the score because, after watching every single VR video on this site, I can honestly say they are ALL very good to excellent. The girls are beautiful, the sets/locations are spectacular and well thought out (several scenes even have a strategically placed mirror that gives you nice views when the girl is heads-down.), the direction is outstanding and the new vids since I've been a member have been killer. This is the very definition of VR porn. I don't say this lightly: BEST VR SITE ON THE INTERNET! OK, back to original review.
=============================
Yeah, this is pretty much what every VR site should emulate.
There are a couple of videos on this site that will absolutely blow you away. One, with Nancy A, is probably the best VR video I have seen so far on any site. She's a frequent model on Met Art and does sex scenes on a few sites, but she really shines here like nowhere else. A few other models are at their best here, too.
SexBabesVR Stats: (as of 2/1/17)
About 40 videos
26 models
Updates every 3 or 4 days
Formats include Gear, Oculus/Vive low and high, and smartphone low and high
60 FPS typical
Highest resolution is 3840x1920
Typical video is about 23 minutes
Typical file size is about 5 gigs.
Videos include tags
3D Video format is Left/Right
Most videos start with the male prone, include a cowboy/reverse cowboy and end up with him in an upright missionary or doggie style with a pull-out or handjob money shot. Several sets includessome in-your-face views and all of them are good.
The sets are upscale and attractive but not distracting, the lighting is perfect, the models are nicely done but not overly done up, they are well directed and it looks like they are enjoying themselves. Conversation is minimal and the males in the scenes do not make any sound. Most sets open with music and a brief set-up of some sort. Some of these are surprisingly good and I found myself saying "Woa!" as I realized the ungodly gorgeous girl in front of me was about to virtually fuck me.
Lucky, lucky me!
Overall, the site and videos have the look and feel of Wow-girls but there is no affiliation to any other site that I can find and the domain owners are different. This is a well run, site, though, so I'm pretty sure somebody with other sites and a lot of resources is running it. Good for them, GREAT for those of us with VR gear.
Bottom line: although small, the quality here is among the best anywhere. This site is setting the bar. (I would score it higher, but it is still very small.) Go ahead and join for a month. it is totally worth it to see just how good high quality VR can be. I'll be back around at least annually....assuming I cancel, which I'm not sure I will do.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans...all of them are fit.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Mostly studio shoots with minimal props.
Navigation, search and voting (with "likes") are all pretty good.
Extra features of the site include orgasm videos, tantric massage and some "tutorials" that you have to see to appreciate.
Daily updates.
Images available in up to 10000k!
Over 268,000 images!
Sets dating back to 2002.
Cons:
The photography, which is about 80% of what goes on at the site, is often studio work shot in a plain, white studio. This is intended to show off the models, which are often amazing, but it can get a little monotonous sometimes.
There have also been occasions lately where one or two models dominate the daily sets. Great if you like the model(s)...
Bottom Line:
Hegre-art.com is an excellent softcore photography site with some interesting and remarkable features. It differs from a lot of other sites in that Peter Hegre usually just wants to show you how amazing the female form can be. He does this very, very well! The girls are generally beautiful and the photography is often stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent.
This site is dominated by really well done single model photo shoots and softcore single-model videos. Most of the models are stunning and the photography is among the best anywhere. The models are probably mostly 20-25 with a few 18 year olds in the mix. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all ethnicities, often very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here) and generally very fit. (I just looked through the last few months of sets and can find not find a single model that doesn't look like she wakeboards or kite-surfs....translation...no fat on any of these models anywhere. Really. None!)
Models are usually completely nude throughout the set, but the shoots are conservative, meaning very few close-ups, spread eagles, etc. The majority of images are full body, natural pose shots. These models don't need a lot of props or pretense. Unlike a lot of other sites, these models don't have a bad side or angle. Still.....I do find myself wishing they would turn around if they are going to pose in a crab or bridge position like that....
There are beach/outdoor scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. Again, these are not romps, but more like showcases for the models and the photographer. It isn't ALSscan because it isn't supposed to be.
.....still, even without overt posing, close-ups, etc., there is often something here that will float your boat.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionally done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. There are sessions like this with men, too along with some other unusual sets or videos ending with a male-model orgasm.
There are, according to the site, over 268,000 images in 4332 galleries dating back as far as 2002! The images from that time-frame, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or print it out for an image that is over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want to line your room with life-sized images of amazing women just standing there in totally naked splendor. This site is your nirvana, then.
There are, on average, about 4 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for a place to appreciate the amazing female form for a while...just take the massage-orgasm videos as a bonus!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HUGE Collection
Completely exclusive
Very good quality images and vids
Many very attractive and diverse models
Many models you haven't seen before
A few of the better models that you have seen
All sets are dates
No recycled material
Site goes back to 2005 and sets got to 2001
3 images sizes and zip file sizes
Multiple video formats
Search on model or keywords
Great value!
No advertising!is generally very good.
Cons:
Navigation could be a bit better in some areas.
Sets are are on multiple pages
Bottom Line:
Every once in a great while, you stumble over something that you should have known about but somehow didn't. Like finding that great restaurant that has been in your neighborhood for years. That's the way I felt when I stumbled onto this site. Wow! What a great collection! How is it possible that I didn't know about this? No idea, but I do now and I can tell you that there is something about it that I really like.
OK, here's the scoop.
This is a European-style photographer showcase site...sort of a cross between Femjoy and Hegre Art. Although it is European style, I think the photographer and most of the models are American or at least English speaking.
Currently releasing a set a day.
Been around since about 2005 or so. Sets date back to 2001.
Mostly photography but there are videos too.
Solo girl and a few girl/girl scenes with some toys, penetration and oral sex. Much more than just two girls standing next to each other like you see in some of the more conservative photo sites.
The girls are not shy and there is a moderate amount of spreading in the photo sets.
I can't tell exactly how many photo sets there are, but it looks like there are about 400 sets and maybe 80 videos.
Videos are a mix of photo shoots and dedicated videos. A few of the girl/girl and orgasm videos are quite good. In general, these videos seem more interesting than the average met-art video, possibly because there is audio. Watching the photo shoot videos is interesting because the photographer is often in the video so you can see an hear how the photographer and model interact. This isn't necessarily something to get off to, but it makes you part of the shoot.
The models are very diverse and nearly all of them are beautiful. No amateur shoots here but the sets are...not quite as glamour-oriented as Met-art perhaps...this may be because the color saturation is more realistic here than it is there. Colors are generally great.
The models come in all shapes, sizes and ethnicities. Skinny to large, A to FFF. Shaved, trimmed and full but (thankfully) none of that totally unkept could-never-wear-a-bikini stuff you sometimes see at other sites.
These models seem all natural and un-enhanced.
Popular models here include Connie Carter, Nessa and Gisele. The top rated models on the site are mostly girls I don't recognize from other sites.
You won't find a single apple, grape, bouquet of flowers or other dumb prop here. No "naked girl in the woods" sets either. Most sets start clothed or partially clothed but several start out completely nude.
The models are nearly all exclusive but there are a few very popular European and US models here as well.
Most shoots are in a studio or someplace with very good lighting.
The sets are simple, not too dramatic, placing emphasis where it should be, on the models. They have a chair to sit in or a bed to lay on.
Model interaction with the photographer is generally excellent. Watching the photo shoot videos with sound confirms this. It adds a nice quality to the shoots.
There is even some light bondage in some sets. Mostly rope-work and a few blindfolds.
Navigation is generally very good. You can search on model name or keyword. Personally, I really dislike having to page through an individual set, though. There are only 12 images on a set-page and many sets have 4 or 5 pages. That is painful, frustrating and no longer needed except to reduce the load on servers.
Download speed is good and I never had a fail. I do not use a Download Manager, but on occasion had 3 or 4 downloads running at once. This didn't break anything.
About the only thing I am not fond of in this site is the large number of black and white photo sets. even a few of the videos are in black and white. I get that it adds drama and is the photographers prerogative. I just prefer realism and true-to-life detail. On the other hand, the black and white sets completely remove any preconceptions that an observer might have about, say, a darker skinned model. Eliminating the color allows one to see just how beautiful a model really is. Nice touch.
Bottom line: If you are into nude photography and enjoy sites like Met-Art, Femjoy, MPL Studios or Hegre-Art, you owe it to yourself to try this place. For $14.99 a month, it may be one of the best bargains on the internet.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge selection of models doing just about anything a guy could want. Excellent navigation. You can set favorites and leave feedback, which influences the scores models get. Many outstanding models. Good mix of photos and videos. Also a good mix of body shots and close ups. Probably one of the best all-teen sites around.
Cons:
Not much in the way of cons. Maybe a few more outdoor sets. Maybe a few more two-girl three-ways...
Bottom Line:
Bottom line? There is something for just about everyone here. Well worth a visit. Although this is a teen site, there is a decent variety of shapes and sizes and a good mix of solo, guy/girl and girl/girl sets. The set locations themselves are basic but not distracting. This isn't glam stuff, but the girls are nicely done-up. Some of the girls you will recognize as they are popular models elsewhere but there are a few exclusives and a few really show their best stuff here. (Just look up Zoey, Malena or a girl named Ebbi and you will see what I mean.) Navigation is great and there doesn't seem to be any really poor images or videos. The site sorts models by popularity (score) but politely stops in that category at about 9 for the benefit of the models. It also sorts by update date and model name. Note that many of the models have different names here than they do on other sites so you have to sift through them if you are looking for anyone in particular. One nice touch is that on most model's pages, there are a few large images, nude and non-nude wallpaper images and collections across all sets titled "ass". "boobs", "legs" and "close-ups". I have been a member here several times over the years and the quality has been consistent on each visit, perhaps a little better this last time. Overall, very good general teen site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very high quality material, often outstanding.
Beautiful, natural models
Some Met Art models but mostly unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Excellent G/G videos
Fast download speeds
Excellent site layout
Navigation is identical to Met Art (Excellent)
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in. Met Art network support is outstanding.
Cons:
Nothing major to list here.
Perhaps a few of the newer solo sets are a little soft in comparison. (Mostly new models)
Bottom Line:
Viv Thomas is primarily a lesbian site with a mix of about 80% lesbian sets and 20% solo sets within the more recent sets. Older sites include solo, boy/girl, some insertion, and lesbian. It became part of the Met Art network several years ago and Met Art has done a really good job of keeping it up.
For perspective, ALS scan is the other lesbian site in the MA network. The girls there are very young, very petite, carefree, happy to experiment and generally give off an almost childish vibe. Viv Thomas, on the other hand, is pretty much exactly what you expect from Met Art in a lesbian site. The women are much more refined, truly beautiful most of the time, and most of the videos and image sets are damn near perfect.
Stats (as of 1/20/2019. These are published on the site):
About 3125 photo sets
About 1881 videos
About 1142 models
4-5 updates a week
Sets are avalable all the way back to 2002!
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
Newer images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
I haven't been a member of this site since Met Art took it over and I'm happy to say that although the overall feel has changed a little, the material puts this site up there toward the top of the Met Art stable.
Viv Thomas, now semi-retired, is an outstanding photographer and videographer who has produced a lot of award winning material for magazines, video production companies and on-line. His older stuff on this site is top quality for the time-frame and the models, damn near all of them, all the way back to 2002, are stunning and not at all shy. I'd say the older stuff parallels Twisty's or Danni's best from the period and the newer stuff is similar to MetArt-X in terms of showy photography. Nearly every solo set has spreading at least and every lesbian set portrays what I imagine is pretty genuine lesbian sex (i.e. these girls are not just standing together in the set, their fingers and tongues are inside each other.) The older sets include some world-class famous models like Sophie Moon, Veronica Zemanova and my all time favorite Marketa Belonoha. Newer sets include a lot of really popular MA models like Niemira and many beautiful models I don't see elsewhere on the MA network. What puts these sets apart from many others is that the early models like Veronica and Marketa are doing things like spreading that they never did in later shoots. And the later shoots are slightly different than what you would find on other MA sites. Make-up for example, makes some of the models like Niemira a little more alluring. Reall ynice job on all of this.
All of the videos on this site since about 2010 are at least 720P. Prior to that, they are 420p. Newer videos go up to 4k.
Navigation on the site is an exact copy of the main Met Art site with many user-adjustable options. Default image sizes, images opening in the same or a different tab, etc. I am very used to the MA navigation and may be a little biased, but I truly believe it is the best navigation system on the internet.
Met Art uses a single-sign on to their sites. Once you sign into a new site under it, you no longer have to log into that site individually. To facilitate this, there is a navigation pull-down that can get you to any of the sites in the network. There is also a "status" page that allows you to see all of your subscription details and you can even sign up for or cancel subscriptions right from this pull-down. This is a very nice solution to an often vexing problem.
OK, bottom line. Even if you are not a fan of lesbian porn, there is a LOT of excellent solo image material here dating back nearly TWO DECADES that you might like a lot. That includes nearly every big model name in porn photography over the last 18 years. The videos since about 2010 are also very diverse and mostly excellent. The only reason I won't give this a 90 or better is because they don't do daily updates, but given the inredible amount of material here, you could spend many, many hours looking through the old stuff on the days there are no new updates.
Look around for discount offers, but be aware that there are sometimes issues with the Met Art single sign-on when you try to sign up for offers made outside the network. If you find a low-price offer but the site doesn't list it because you already have an account within the Met Art network, contact support and they will work it out for you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive, high quality videos and images
Extremely attractive, popular young models/porn stars
Mostly US models/porn stars
Mostly slender, fit girls
Good quality photo sets for each video
Once you join, login is automatic via token
Most videos are in 4K, all are at least 1080p
All sets are dated
Cons:
Site is still a little small
Navigation is basic but there is a search function
Careful with the cross-check on sign-up (it resets by itself)
Bottom Line:
Vixen.com is shaping up to be one of the best exclusive video sites on the Internet. I would place it up there with Wow Girls and the Passion-HD/POVD network in terms of overall production quality, but with primarily US models/porn stars. The ONLY reason it isn't a 90 is because it is not a very large collection yet.
All of the young, petite (mostly) US porn stars are here on this site. Leah Gotti, Naomi Woods, Kimmy Granger, Jill Kassidy, Mia Malkava, etc., etc.
Quick stats: (As of 4/4/2017)
72 sets (Video and photos)
41 models
All sets are dated
Sets come in multiple formats up to 4k
All come in at least 1080p
Photo sets are one size (2000x3000)
Sets and models are user-scored
Sets are user-tagged
Mostly straight sex with a few anal scenes
Mostly couples with a few GGB scenes.
Perhaps what sets this site apart, at least in my mind, is the nearly perfect make-up, lighting, sets, photography and videography. I've seen most of these girls elsewhere , but here they are absolutely fucking beautiful. And there are a few I haven't seen elsewhere that are just breathtaking. The videos are very well done with excellent framing and perspective (no across the room shots here!) And the sex is ACTIVE. I mean everything is bouncing or slamming or jiggling active. Absolutely not boring. They even through a little top-down POV sex into many of the videos. Yep, I'm done.
The images are also excellent. There is always an opening strip-scene and then shots mimicking the sex scene, but these are not just screen caps and are not just shot during the video. They are separate, photography oriented sets that could be on Met-Art except here you get spreads and cum shots. And the pornstar is almost always looking at the camera, even when she is in the middle of doing something to her partner. Very nice touch.
Bottom line? The site is still a little small, but it is totally worth the intro price you can find at the site and around the Internet. If you like to watch really beautiful girls getting their lights fucked out in well done, high quality videos and photo sets, then you simply must check this site out.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very high quality material, often outstanding.
Beautiful, natural models
Many Met Art models but also many unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Everybody looks relaxed and comfortable
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good site layout and navigation
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in.
Cons:
Not much bad here.
Site updates 4 times a week but more frequent updates in prior years.
Like some other MA sites, videos can be a little snoozy
Site navigation is not quite as versitile as Met Art but it is still very good.
Occasional issues with sign-ups for existing network members.
Bottom Line:
This is a single photographer, mostly images site that is part of the Met Art network but is marketed and billed separately. Rylsky is a top-notch photographer and the work presented here is an extension of the work he(?) publishes at Met Art. Sometimes there will be a video from a photo session published at Met Art. Sometimes the sets are from the same shoot day in a different location and sometimes the sets are of beginning or hopeful models and for whatever reason this set didn't make it over to Met Art. This includes MANY models that are extremely popular on Met Art from when they were just beginning.
Stats (Deduced because the numbers are not published):
About 2000 photo sets
About 200 videos
About 300 models
4 updates a week but prior hears had near daily updates.
The site has been around since 2012
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, etc.
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
Note that this is a relatively softcore solo model site with a few girl/girl scenes. There is no sex, there are no couples, there is no insertion, masturbation, etc. On the other hand, the girls are not shy, there are very few props, hardly any clothes (most sets start naked or very nearly naked) and the shots range from full body shots to close-ups. There are frequent open legged shots, a few naturally open labia and a moderate number of sets that include mild spreading. The girls are generally shaved or close cropped, but there are a few hairy girls. In general, if you enjoy admiring beautiful women in all types of settings, poses and positions, this is a good place to get unobstructed views of the wonderful female form.
These sets are of the same quality as the Met Art sets, meaning they are usually excellent. Good lighting, focus, composition and exposure. The models here are just as beautiful and often just as open as they are over at Met Art. Many of the same models are here, so if there are some you like at Met Art, they will probably be here too. Sometimes they are early sets and sometimes they are current.
Every time I look through this site I see something wonderful. Looking through the site to write the review, I found two models (Liv and Henrietta, both from 2014) that are absolutely mesmerizing. Plenty of world class models here like Emily Bloom, Astrud, Nancy and Halley. Thee is simply no zooming through this site. Nearly every set thumbnail becons you to slow down, look more closely, take it all in. Enjoy your time with these beautiful women.
Current sets are about 80% popular models and 20% fresh faces. Sometimes the fresh models look very young but for the most part, models seem to be in their early 20s.
Navigation is basically the same as Met Art with one important exception. Although there are user options so you can customize your experience, there is no option to open images in a new page like there is on Met Art. This means that image browsing is single threaded and you end up having to backpage to get back to sets or the update page. You can right-click of course, but it is clunkier than it should be. Making navigation on all of the Met Art network sites the same should be a priority for them. I am a member of 6 MA sites and there are some inconsistencies in site design and navigation that make it frustrating when switching between them.
On the plus-side, Met Art uses a single-sign on to their sites. Once you sign into a new site under it, you no longer have to log into that site individually. To facilitate this, there is a navigation pull-down that can get you to any of the sites in the network. There is also a "status" page that allows you to see all of your subscription details and you can even sign up for or cancel subscriptions right from this pull-down. This is a very nice solution to an often vexing problem.
The only reason I'm not giving this site a higher score is because of the relatively infrequent updates (4 new sets a week) compared to the top-billed site on the nework, Met Art.
There is one other issue you should be aware of. If you are already a member of one of the Met Art sites, the single sign-on sometimes limits your "new subscriber" options to a higher rate. If this happens, use a different email or contact support.
Bottom line: If you like the Met Art style of photography, which I personally think is among the best on the planet, you will not be dissappointed by this site. I have been a member for a couple of months now and still have not been able to look at everything since the last time I was here. If you look around, you can find it for $19 a month. PU has a special right now for only $9.95 a month. FOR GOD'S SAKE, MAN, JUST DO THAT! Plan on spending at least 2 months here. There is a ton of excellent material and you won't want to miss a thing. Highly recommended
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls here are all beautiful, mostly Eastern European and very popular. If you like the Met-Art or FemJoy networks, you will also like this site. The site has evolved a little, though, and is now featuring several porn stars and starlets that you have seen elsewhere. The videos are well done, dedicated videos. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to disappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done.
Cons:
The overall quality of the images and videos seems to have declined slightly, or, at best, is not keeping up with the standards of other sites. The site format has not been updated in a while and seems a little dated. The number of images in each set has dropped and the highest resolution shots are often upscaled rather than converted from raw files. The site also relies heavily on all-white backgrounds, which was a thing a couple of years ago but seems a little tiresome today.
The site is now breaking out the photo sets and the video sets from a shoot, that used to be one release, into multiple releases. This allows the site to effectively cut the number of shoots in half.
Perhaps the biggest shortcoming that this site has is that it only updates once every 2-4 days. With several other sites updating daily, the potential that this site once had to really compete with the top sites has dulled somewhat.
Bottom Line:
This is a well done site. The photographers and videographers do a very good job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create excellent imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some very good videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set has changed since my last visit and no longer allows you to select size. Instead, you get a full screen image and a zoom button that allows you to zoom in considerably. Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels. Videos come in SD, HD and 4K.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice. Also, several of the more recent image sets are very fuzzy at the high resolution, either because of compression, editing, or both.
Overall, this site could easily fit into the Met Art network as a sex-art clone, or in the Femjoy network as a Joymii clone. There are nicely done photo and video sets, beautiful models and the sex is comparable to the sites I mention above. But the dated format, not-quite-top-tier image quality and less frequent updates mean that this site is no longer one of my top picks. It is still a great site and I highly recommend it, though.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not shy
Good site layout
3 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster)
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation still not up to par with the best sites
Videos are a bit snoozy
Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic
Bottom Line:
I noticed my review of this site expired and there are no current reviews, so I'm updating my old review. Very little has changed since 2014 except the number of sets has gone up a lot.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open and the site seems to e getting a little more explicit than it was in the early days. No problem with that!
Lets talk about content:
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 4000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere.
Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views of great looking models.
The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
So..what's not to like? Well...there are STILL a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best.
First, the navigation is still a little off. There are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. You have to click "back to gallery" or pageback to return to the gallery page. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving because you will inevitably close an image and end up exiting the set. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery).
And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I was told they were working on this in 2014. Apparently, they lied.
Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, showy, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great interaction
2 sets a day
Models generally are not shy
Good site layout
3 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster)
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation not up to par with the best sites
Videos are a bit snoozy
Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic
Site is not quite as reliable as some others.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member of this site 5 or 6 times over the years and keep forgetting to write a review. It keeps drawing me back.
Here's the good and bad (absolutely no ugly).
This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open. I've never used this word in a review before. Delicious.
Lets talk about content:
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 3000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere.
The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful unobstructed view.
So..what's not to like? Well...I know the webmasters are working on improvements, but there are a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best. I know they will be reading this so forgive me if I direct some of my points to them.
First, the navigation is a little off. there are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. Click back and you are taken back to the top of the gallery page regardless of where the image was that you clicked on. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery).
And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I have been told they are working on fixing this and will happily report when it is fixed.
Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Part of the TMW network so you get a lot of other material
Good looking, mostly young European models
Many familiar popular models here.
Consistently good quality VR videos
Decent number of VR videos
All videos can be previewed/streamed in 2-D (that feature is unique to this site).
Still images available in zip files.
File names are numbered, named and include resolution.
Release dates are included.
Up-next videos are listed.
Models and videos are user-scored.
Cons:
Navigation within this site is kind of basic
Searches, etc, bring up all site material. making it difficult to sort out VR material.
Model names are not included on the updates or results pages.
There are a few more tattoos here than I've seen at other sites.
Bottom Line:
Although this is a micro-site within the Teen Mega World network, my goal here is to review JUST THE VR material for those who are looking specifically for that. As a result, my impression and rating may be a little different since I am comparing only VR sites.
TMWVR is among the top five or so VR sites today. The videos are generally very good quality and the selection is larger than average.
TMWVR Statistics:
61 videos
About 25 models
Models are European
Nearly all girls release both an observation and a participation video.
Worth noting: Only a few anal scenes here. (I'm not an anal fan, so I appreciate that. You may not.)
One new set every 4 days or so.
Videos come in Rift/Vive, Gear and mobile formats.
Videos also come in PC (flat) format in 1080p and 2-D mobile format. (This is the only site I've seen that consistently provides this.)
Sets and models are rated on a 10 point scale.
File sizes, resolutions and frame rates are listed
Thumbnail images of each set with an available zip file.
Typical videos are 25 minutes long.
Oculus/Vive files are about 6 GB.
If this were a freestanding VR site, it would easily be in the top 5. The fact that it comes with an entire network of other good quality material puts it up there in the top 3.
Video quality is very good to excellent. The sets are reasonably well done, although many of the shoots look like they take place in somebody's apartment. There are no significant distractions on set. The models young, attractive, are well directed and they look like they are enjoying themselves for the most part. (A few girls I've never seen before look almost mad...probably just a Russian cultural thing.) A few of the videos are kind of silly (i.e. Nicole Love wearing a Pokeman robe/hoodie/costume thing), but they still are not that hard to watch. (Nicole is in another set that more than makes up for it.)
There are a couple of videos here that are really, really excellent. Paula Shy, for example, provides a very impressive performance in a VR video called "Bangin' Bookworm" that will leave you totally satisfied. I would easily put that one on my top ten list of the 450 or so VR videos that I have collected so far. There are one or two other top-ten and/or top-twenty VR vids here, too.
One thing I noticed here that I don't see everywhere else was some pretty high-energy screwing going on. The sex often starts slow and then gets crazy intense. (No shortage of seriously flailing boobs or totally slapping crotches here...) In some scenes it seems like, I don't know, these couples were actually trying to get each other off. That is nice to see and, you know, be a part of.
Every model provides both a passive VR video where she gets off in front of you and a more active one where you screw her (or more accurately, she rides you.) These come in sort of a set with the observation video first and teh participation video a few releases later. Most videos have you lay prone and you remain that way with no switch to an upright, active position. A few models have more than one complete set.
There are more tattoos here than I've seen on the other high quality VR sites including at least one huge back-covering tattoo. One of the surrogate guys has a large chest tattoo also. These are all OK, but they distract a little from the action. "What is that thing supposed to be on her back" or "Hey! Look! I have a tattoo!" are not things I want to be thinking about when a VR girl is bouncing on my dick, but here it happens. Oh well.
Although I said I would not bring up the other TMW sites, there are a couple of pros and cons.
On the pro side, all of the VR videos come in an HD non-VR 2-D version also. If you are into full POV but don't have VR gear, you just hit the jackpot because by their nature, these are awesome POV videos.
On the con side, you will often get tossed into the general pool when searching or browsing and the only way to tell if the video is VR is by looking at the watermark. Similarly, once a model is identified on a video detail page, her other videos also show up at the bottom of the page, but most will probably not be VR videos.
This is a great thing if you really like the model and want to see more of her. Not so great if you are just looking for VR stuff.
Just for comparison, the TMWVR VR videos are generally better than the TMW non-VR videos. This may be because they are newer, because they are better directed, or because the skill set of the crew is better. I'm not sure. They are just better. Given the requirements, they probably should be.
Bottom line? $20 for a site that includes 60+ VR videos PLUS thousands of non-VR items is a no-brainer! And as I said, the quality here is generally very good. Go for it! I recommend it!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
