Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very high quality material, often outstanding.
Beautiful, natural models
Some Met Art models but mostly unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Excellent G/G videos
Fast download speeds
Excellent site layout
Navigation is identical to Met Art (Excellent)
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in. Met Art network support is outstanding.
Cons:
Nothing major to list here.
Perhaps a few of the newer solo sets are a little soft in comparison. (Mostly new models)
Bottom Line:
Viv Thomas is primarily a lesbian site with a mix of about 80% lesbian sets and 20% solo sets within the more recent sets. Older sites include solo, boy/girl, some insertion, and lesbian. It became part of the Met Art network several years ago and Met Art has done a really good job of keeping it up.
For perspective, ALS scan is the other lesbian site in the MA network. The girls there are very young, very petite, carefree, happy to experiment and generally give off an almost childish vibe. Viv Thomas, on the other hand, is pretty much exactly what you expect from Met Art in a lesbian site. The women are much more refined, truly beautiful most of the time, and most of the videos and image sets are damn near perfect.
Stats (as of 1/20/2019. These are published on the site):
About 3125 photo sets
About 1881 videos
About 1142 models
4-5 updates a week
Sets are avalable all the way back to 2002!
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
Newer images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
I haven't been a member of this site since Met Art took it over and I'm happy to say that although the overall feel has changed a little, the material puts this site up there toward the top of the Met Art stable.
Viv Thomas, now semi-retired, is an outstanding photographer and videographer who has produced a lot of award winning material for magazines, video production companies and on-line. His older stuff on this site is top quality for the time-frame and the models, damn near all of them, all the way back to 2002, are stunning and not at all shy. I'd say the older stuff parallels Twisty's or Danni's best from the period and the newer stuff is similar to MetArt-X in terms of showy photography. Nearly every solo set has spreading at least and every lesbian set portrays what I imagine is pretty genuine lesbian sex (i.e. these girls are not just standing together in the set, their fingers and tongues are inside each other.) The older sets include some world-class famous models like Sophie Moon, Veronica Zemanova and my all time favorite Marketa Belonoha. Newer sets include a lot of really popular MA models like Niemira and many beautiful models I don't see elsewhere on the MA network. What puts these sets apart from many others is that the early models like Veronica and Marketa are doing things like spreading that they never did in later shoots. And the later shoots are slightly different than what you would find on other MA sites. Make-up for example, makes some of the models like Niemira a little more alluring. Reall ynice job on all of this.
All of the videos on this site since about 2010 are at least 720P. Prior to that, they are 420p. Newer videos go up to 4k.
Navigation on the site is an exact copy of the main Met Art site with many user-adjustable options. Default image sizes, images opening in the same or a different tab, etc. I am very used to the MA navigation and may be a little biased, but I truly believe it is the best navigation system on the internet.
Met Art uses a single-sign on to their sites. Once you sign into a new site under it, you no longer have to log into that site individually. To facilitate this, there is a navigation pull-down that can get you to any of the sites in the network. There is also a "status" page that allows you to see all of your subscription details and you can even sign up for or cancel subscriptions right from this pull-down. This is a very nice solution to an often vexing problem.
OK, bottom line. Even if you are not a fan of lesbian porn, there is a LOT of excellent solo image material here dating back nearly TWO DECADES that you might like a lot. That includes nearly every big model name in porn photography over the last 18 years. The videos since about 2010 are also very diverse and mostly excellent. The only reason I won't give this a 90 or better is because they don't do daily updates, but given the inredible amount of material here, you could spend many, many hours looking through the old stuff on the days there are no new updates.
Look around for discount offers, but be aware that there are sometimes issues with the Met Art single sign-on when you try to sign up for offers made outside the network. If you find a low-price offer but the site doesn't list it because you already have an account within the Met Art network, contact support and they will work it out for you.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Still one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Set management is among the best in the business (make-up, lighting, wardrobe, location, atmosphere, image quality and composition are all superb.)
Most of the models are beyond beautiful.
Models are generally not shy, most are quite open and model Eye contact is excellent.
Nice mix of full-body and close-up shots.
All of the models appear to be enjoying themselves!
The previews are highly representative.
Usually one new set or video daily.
All sets are dated
Thumbnails are on a single page for each set. (Thank you!)
Redesigned site provides excellent design and navigation.
Cons:
Not much to list here...I have to dig deep to find things:
Browsing is single thread from updates page to model-set page to individual images. No new windows for sets, thumbnails or images.)
These are all REALLY minor things, though.
Some might not like that there is no comment section for each model, but seeing how that tends to get abused at other sites, I don't blame the webmaster for that decision at all.
Bottom Line:
I've had an annual subscription to this site for several years, now and have never once regretted it. Gorgeous models, really well done sets and excellent overall. Customer service when I contacted them was prompt, helpful and courteous. Billing is
This site has been around since 2003 and the collection is pretty massive. At last count, there were about 328,000 images and over 725 videos. 1 set a day would put it at around 5400+ sets. Older sets are very well done but not quite as revealing and the resolution is not quite as high. (A few sets prior to about 2008 are non-nude or partially nude.) There appear to be nearly 400 models, the vast majority of whom are simply stunning. All of the models are completely natural. I see a lot of sites where the model ratings are artificially inflated to 9. Not here. Here they are nearly all true 9s...or better.
Images come in four sizes both for viewing and 3 sizes in zip files: 1200, 2000, 4000 on the long side. Older sets are at least 1200 and 2000.
As I mentioned above, the sets are excellent. I can't really recall seeing anything I didn't like. The girls are happy, friendly and open. Lighting, focus, composition, etc. are excellent.
This is generally a solo-girl softcore site, but there is a toy occasionally and some of the video sets include masturbation. Girls usually start out clothed or partially clothed but many of the outdoor sets start out completely nude.
Newer sets are usually about 80-120 images each, which is more than many other sites. Some older sets are a bit smaller. Older sets are also a bit more conservative, although the imagery is just is good. Some older sets are also continuations (I.e. 30 shots in one release and 30 more from the same set sometime later), but it isn't enough to be a bother and they don't seem to do that anymore.
Note that many European models have a different name on this site. If you are looking for a particular model, start with one of the global model listings to see if she is on this site. If she is on Met-Art of Femjoy, chances are good that she is here, too.
The videos, which come out about once a week, are probably better than many of the comparable sites in this niche. They break the videos down into 3 ratings: Lifestyle, Sensual and Explicit. The first category might be BTS or travel with a model. Sensual videos are bed, shower or similar model showcases, And the explicit vids are just that. You either get a view of every inch of the from pretty much every angle or they are masturbation videos. One main model, Karissa Diamond, has over 700 videos covering all three categories and I'm pretty sure she has video proof that she has gotten naked or gotten herself off in every major city in Europe. Life would be so much mor fun if there were a Guinness record for that....
All sets are properly dated and although there is no flat out recycling, occasionally there are "Director's cuts" that provide a new mix of images from an older set of a popular model. Every set all the way back to 2003 is unique as far as I can tell. The girls in those "new old stock" sets are gorgeous enough for you not to mind at all.
Another really nice thing is that the highest resolution of each image is native. An image displayed in 4000 was actually shot in 4000 or higher. (Occasionally you may find a low-light inside set shot near the ISO limits of the camera, which tends to make the largest images a little grainy, but that's not because of resizing.) Older shots at 1600, 2000 or 3000 were shot in that and not resized. there isn't a single fuzzy or obviously up-sized image on the entire site as far as I can tell! Kudos to the team for that!
About the only negative I can find on the entire site, and it is a truly tiny negative, is the single threaded browsing. No new windows open when you drill down. This is probably to keep the website traffic down, but I prefer the Met-art style where images appear in their own windows. Yes...I can type a key while clicking to open pages in a new window, but it seems like it should be a preference setting. Otherwise, navigation is very good. Once in a set, all images are presented on a single page and you have forward, back, thumbnail and open image in any available size options.
Bottom line: If you like the Met-Art, Femjoy or Watch4Beauty sites, you will really like this one. It easily rates up there with the best. There are occasional specials, but even at $29 it is a good deal and the annual rate of $99 is one of the best annual rates out there. This site gets my highest recommendation.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HUGE Collection
Completely exclusive
Very good quality images and vids
Many very attractive and diverse models
Many models you haven't seen before
A few of the better models that you have seen
Updated site goes back to 2007
If you like Black and white sets, there are a lot here.
3 images sizes and zip file sizes
Multiple video formats
Search on model or keywords
Good download speeds.
Cons:
Navigation is awful.
Sets are are on multiple pages
Sets are no longer dated except when paging through update history.
Looks like some sets are either recycled or older.
Some sets are very small.
If you don't like black and white sets, there are way too many here.
Bottom Line:
In a prior review, I listed this site as a pleasant surprise and gave it one of my highest scores. Sadly, a few things have changed, including the standards of the other top sites, while Morey Studio has remained more-or-less the same and in some ways declined. The quality of the work is still excellent and most of the models are beautiful, but the halo is gone.
This is a European-style photographer showcase site...sort of a cross between Femjoy and Hegre Art.
Release count has dropped to a set every other day or so.
Sets now only go back to about 2007. (before it was 2001)
About 325 models.
About 1250 sets.
Mostly photography but there are videos too.
Solo girl and a few girl/girl scenes with some toys, penetration and oral sex. Much more than just two girls standing next to each other like you see in some of the more conservative photo sites.
The girls are not shy and there is a moderate amount of spreading in the photo sets. But I have to warn you, a LOT of the models are just glam-style with very conservative sets.
Videos are a mix of photo shoots and dedicated videos. A few of the girl/girl and orgasm videos are quite good.
The models are very diverse and nearly all of them are beautiful. Skinny to large, A to FFF. Shaved, trimmed and full. The top rated models on the site are mostly girls I don't recognize from other sites but there are several popular models, especially in the older sets. You won't find a single apple, grape, watermelon, bouquet of flowers or other dumb prop here. No "naked girl in the woods" sets either. Most sets start clothed or partially clothed but several start out completely nude. The models are nearly all exclusive but there are a few very popular European and US models here as well. Sets, lighting and Colors are generally great.
There are a LOT of black and white (B&W) sets. I understand the artistic concept behind B&W images, but there is a major flaw here because a lot of the harder scenes are in B&W. A girl/girl set or a set with dildo masturbation is pretty much intended to get the viewer off. Converting it to black and white does not make it art, it just makes it a dissappointing set. Many other sites include B&W white images in their otherwise color sets but here, entire sets, sometimes all sets for a particular model, are B&W.
Most shoots are in a studio or someplace with very good lighting.
The sets are simple, not too dramatic, placing emphasis where it should be, on the models. They have a chair to sit in or a bed to lay on.
There is even some light bondage in some sets. Mostly rope-work and a few blindfolds.
Navigation is Poor-to-OK. The site has changed a little since the last time I was here, I think, and it is not up to par with the other top softcore sites. I also noticed that some sections of the site are inconsistent with others.
You can search on model name or set keyword.
When you do that, one set comes up "highlighted" and you have to then open that set, or you can open other, thumbnail sets that are related. Navigation is single-threaded so you have to deliberately open things in new tabs if you don't want to spend half your time paging back.
Sets are laid out with 12 images to a page and multiple pages. If you get to a set from the updates page, it takes you to the set page and you have to click again to open it. Some sets are pretty small and some shoots are pretty clearly broken up into smaller sets. There are also several sets from the "private collection" which translates into unreleased sets taken years ago. They are usually good sets, but there is probably a reason why they were not released in 2010 when shot, and it reduces the amount of new model material on the site.
Sets are no longer dated on the set page itself, which is weird and deliberate. It opens up the likelyhood of recycling old sets. The only way to see dates is to scroll backwards through the incredibly clunky updates pages. There is no year/month index to take you to a date. You have to scroll past 100+ sets to the bottom of each update page and click "previous updates" to
get to the early sets.
Model pages are also a little..off. If a model only has one set, all of the other slots on the model page fill with other models. This makes it very difficult to see how many sets a model has. Very odd approach.
Another thing I noticed is that several very popular models from years ago are here, but they only have one set. And of course, you don't find this out until you join and go to the model page. That seems marginally deceptive. Ther was one model that I saw in a preview shot that I never found on the site. No idea why.
Bottom line: Although this site has lost a little of its previous luster, it still has a ton of excellent solo-model and girl/girl softcore material. For $14.99 for the first month and 9.99 a month after that, it is a very good deal, but be prepared to do a LOT of browsing.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality material
Beautiful, natural, mostly very young models
Many Met Art models but also many unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
All European models
Good site layout and navigation
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in.
Cons:
Overall quality and update frequency has declined somewhat in the last 6 months.
No consistency in release timing or between videos and image sets.
Only one set a week lately and 3 of 4 November releases were videos.
Overall site quality is not as good as it once was.
Site navigation is not quite as versitile as Met Art but it is still very good.
Occasional issues with sign-ups for existing network members.
Model names are not consistent with the rest of the Met Art network.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to go a littel Jeckyl and Hyde in this review. Bear with me.
Stats (Deduced because the numbers are not published):
About 1000 photo sets
About 260 videos
About 200 models
1 update a week but prior to 2018, there were 4 updates a week.
The site has been around since 2013
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, etc.
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
Stunning 18 is one of the satellite web sites in eh Met Art network established, I think, for the photographer Antonio Clemens.
This is the third or fourth time I've joined this site and I have to say I'm pretty disappointed since the last time I joined. Apparently, Antonio Clemens is no longer shooting for Met Art and, since this was essentially his site, they are scrambling to keep things going. The last time one of his sets was published was in September but it appears that his sets since April or May were from the files. Thierry Murell has stepped in, but things have changed....alot!
The number of releases has dropped to one a week, which is pretty awful considering the release schedule was 4 times a week just a year ago. And the sets that are being released are...inconsistent with the prior theme of the site and not up to the prior quality of this site or of the Met Art network. Some sets look like they were borrowed from ALSscan and some others seem like odd videos. Here's another example and this one is DAMN WEIRD! 5 sets in August, 7 sets in July, 8 sets in June and 8 sets in May. These were the last sets by Antonio Clemens and ALL OF THESE 28 SETS EXCEPT 1 were of the SAME MODEL! Now, the model is Irene and she is beautiful, but some of these "sets" were partials and the next release would be the rest. Like I said, this is just weird, especially for a site in the Met Art network. You would think they would have the collective resources to keep this site up and get it looking right again after 6 months.
Now, aside from this relatively recent weirdness, there is a lot of great 18-22 YO material here from before about May of 2018 all the way back to January of 2013. About 60-70% of the models are young, pretty and many of these models are girls you will not see elsewhere. You can tell they are new and, although there may be a few open-legged shots, you can also see that many have not yet found their confidence. All of those prior sets between 2013 and earlier this year were shot by Antonio Clemens. They are consistent and generally very good. Focus, lighting, sets, exposure, poses, etc. are all excellent.
The other 30-40% of the models in these sets are maybe a little older and much, much more experienced and open. For example, Anjelica, the pretty young porn star, has 8 videos and 3 photo sets from 2013-2015. She's not shy at all. Melena A, the little cat-tattooed gymnast turned flexy nude model is here with 17 fairly early sets, mostly photo sets. Her first set is called "Juicy Pussy". It is an accurate title but it easily could have been applied to any of her sets. There are others here, too, like 21 sets from the glam-style model Danica Jewels, here called Delilah G., and 24 videos from the wonderful naked ballarina Annett A. You get my point. The pre-2018 stuff on this site is a wonderful blend of young, light, fresh, delicate, sometimes a little shy beauties and OMG sexy porn stars and experienced, confident models that usually know how to give you what you are looking for.
This is another of the Met-Art sites that almost has the same navigation as Met-Art, but not quite. There is no option to open anything in another window. As a result, you have to either do this manually, or back up a lot. It really needs to be the same for all of these sites.
Although pricing is separate for each of the Met Art sites, they do have a nifty single sign-on feature that allows you to access any of the MA sites that you are a member of via a little pull-down menu on the main Met Art site. Once you log in using this option, the sight keeps track of you and allows access to any othe site you have subscribed too. Nice feature.
There is one other issue you should be aware of. If you are already a member of one of the Met Art sites, the single sign-on sometimes limits your "new subscriber" options to a higher rate than the one you asked for. If this happens, use a different email or contact support.
OK, almost out of room. Bottom line: In spite of the recent failings, there is a TON of great material here. If you haven't visited this site yet, there is a holiday special of only $9.95. For that price, joining is a no brainer. I will keep an eye on this site and update the score and recommendation accordingly when the site theme and new material quality stabilizes. For now it is recommended with some reservations regarding new material.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very high quality material, often outstanding.
Beautiful, natural models
Many Met Art models but also many unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Everybody looks relaxed and comfortable
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good site layout and navigation
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in.
Cons:
Not much bad here.
Site updates 4 times a week but more frequent updates in prior years.
Like some other MA sites, videos can be a little snoozy
Site navigation is not quite as versitile as Met Art but it is still very good.
Occasional issues with sign-ups for existing network members.
Bottom Line:
This is a single photographer, mostly images site that is part of the Met Art network but is marketed and billed separately. Rylsky is a top-notch photographer and the work presented here is an extension of the work he(?) publishes at Met Art. Sometimes there will be a video from a photo session published at Met Art. Sometimes the sets are from the same shoot day in a different location and sometimes the sets are of beginning or hopeful models and for whatever reason this set didn't make it over to Met Art. This includes MANY models that are extremely popular on Met Art from when they were just beginning.
Stats (Deduced because the numbers are not published):
About 2000 photo sets
About 200 videos
About 300 models
4 updates a week but prior hears had near daily updates.
The site has been around since 2012
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, etc.
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
Note that this is a relatively softcore solo model site with a few girl/girl scenes. There is no sex, there are no couples, there is no insertion, masturbation, etc. On the other hand, the girls are not shy, there are very few props, hardly any clothes (most sets start naked or very nearly naked) and the shots range from full body shots to close-ups. There are frequent open legged shots, a few naturally open labia and a moderate number of sets that include mild spreading. The girls are generally shaved or close cropped, but there are a few hairy girls. In general, if you enjoy admiring beautiful women in all types of settings, poses and positions, this is a good place to get unobstructed views of the wonderful female form.
These sets are of the same quality as the Met Art sets, meaning they are usually excellent. Good lighting, focus, composition and exposure. The models here are just as beautiful and often just as open as they are over at Met Art. Many of the same models are here, so if there are some you like at Met Art, they will probably be here too. Sometimes they are early sets and sometimes they are current.
Every time I look through this site I see something wonderful. Looking through the site to write the review, I found two models (Liv and Henrietta, both from 2014) that are absolutely mesmerizing. Plenty of world class models here like Emily Bloom, Astrud, Nancy and Halley. Thee is simply no zooming through this site. Nearly every set thumbnail becons you to slow down, look more closely, take it all in. Enjoy your time with these beautiful women.
Current sets are about 80% popular models and 20% fresh faces. Sometimes the fresh models look very young but for the most part, models seem to be in their early 20s.
Navigation is basically the same as Met Art with one important exception. Although there are user options so you can customize your experience, there is no option to open images in a new page like there is on Met Art. This means that image browsing is single threaded and you end up having to backpage to get back to sets or the update page. You can right-click of course, but it is clunkier than it should be. Making navigation on all of the Met Art network sites the same should be a priority for them. I am a member of 6 MA sites and there are some inconsistencies in site design and navigation that make it frustrating when switching between them.
On the plus-side, Met Art uses a single-sign on to their sites. Once you sign into a new site under it, you no longer have to log into that site individually. To facilitate this, there is a navigation pull-down that can get you to any of the sites in the network. There is also a "status" page that allows you to see all of your subscription details and you can even sign up for or cancel subscriptions right from this pull-down. This is a very nice solution to an often vexing problem.
The only reason I'm not giving this site a higher score is because of the relatively infrequent updates (4 new sets a week) compared to the top-billed site on the nework, Met Art.
There is one other issue you should be aware of. If you are already a member of one of the Met Art sites, the single sign-on sometimes limits your "new subscriber" options to a higher rate. If this happens, use a different email or contact support.
Bottom line: If you like the Met Art style of photography, which I personally think is among the best on the planet, you will not be dissappointed by this site. I have been a member for a couple of months now and still have not been able to look at everything since the last time I was here. If you look around, you can find it for $19 a month. PU has a special right now for only $9.95 a month. FOR GOD'S SAKE, MAN, JUST DO THAT! Plan on spending at least 2 months here. There is a ton of excellent material and you won't want to miss a thing. Highly recommended
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many popular, young, good looking porn stars and models (180+)
Exclusive, excellent quality videos
Wide vartiety of settings and scenarios.
Good Navigation.
Decent search functions.
Good download speeds.
Video downloads come in 8 sizes and newer vids are in 4k.
Very good separation of the types of videos here into 4 groups.
Erotica-X features sensual sex videos that are perfect for watching with your partner.
All videos are dated.
Cons:
Not much in the con department:
Photo sets seem like afterthoughts.
Photos are only in one size. (1920x1280).
No zip files.
No keyword search.
Only one update a week, on average.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying this is a quality site with a lot of great material from some of the best looking female porn stars in the industry. Although the site is billed as a network, it is one well integrated site with material broken down in to 4 categories: Hard-X, Erotica-X, Dark-X and Lesbian-X. These categories are fairly self explanatory, and they do a surprisingly good job of separating Erotica-X, which is mostly straight couples or threesome sex in more sensual situations (stuff you might watch with your girlfriend), with hard-X, which includes anal, DP, some huge dicks in some really small girls (i.e. Piper Perri) and generally more active and aggresive physical sex. Lesbian-X is all about the ladies pleasuring themselves and each other and ranges from solo stuff to some serious jamming and it includes some peeing and other stuff.
This site is pretty large. I count 1120 videos in all categories, about 578 of which are Hard-X, 85 are Lesbian-X , 274 are Erotica-X and 168 are Black-X. There are 200 female porn-stars listed and no male stars listed in the directory although they are listed on individual video page. Videos date back to 2013 and there is one new release a week.
I mentioned that Erotica-X is a really excellent collection of videos to watch with your wife, girlfriend or partner. I say this because they are well done videos, sensual, gentle, caring, very respectful of the women in the scenes (no throttling, rough sex, abuse of any kind). There are a few girl-girl scenes in Erotica-X, but they are really gentle compared to the fuck-fest in Lesbian-X. If you enjoy watching nice sensual sex with your partner, this is probably a really good place to find it.
Site layout and navigation are good. Models are listed, searchable and cross-referenced on each-video page. That goes for male models also (except for some gang-bang and gang-blowjob scenes where the male models are not listed). If you like a model, click on her name and all of the vids for her/him appear. You can create a playlist and you can add models, female or male, to your favorites. There is a thumbs-up/thumbs-down ranking for each video so you can see how they rate on their page, but there is no scoring or ranking system and there are no keyword options, although there are some "categories" on each video page that lists things like Hardcore, Facial, Fingering, Brunette, Blowjob, Anal, Tittyfuck, Big Tits, Pussy Licking, etc. This is a single threaded site, so if you want multiple windows, you have to use your keyboard.
I have to say that most of the sets, lighting, video and, of course, the actresses are beautiful. Somebody put a lot of thought into making sure that you aren't distracted by too much BS in video. The women have no or very few tattoos and, thank god, so do the men (I don't mind really well done tattoos, but some male pornstars on other sites are literally covered with them and that is really distracting. Not here.) Make-up is nicely done, too.
Probably the only shortcoming has to do with the photo sets included with the videos. Many of the images themselves are excellent, but the way they are provided, managed and named, with no zip file options, makes them difficult to download and keep. A few other sites do a much better job of this.
Bottom line: In an internet seemingly overflowing with high-production-quality porn sites, X-Empire is a pleasant surprise. The overall material may not quite be glam-porn like some other sites, but the material is probably comparable to Vixen or much of the Fantasy-HD network and far better than the run-of-the-mill porn site.
The main reason I didn't score this site higher is because they only release one new video every week or so. That makes it hard to stick around once you join for a month and get a chance to see what you want to see. That said, many sites in this category only release a set or two a week, so I don't think that is a deal killer-by any means. I woudl recommend that you visit this site soon if you haven't been here before and then check back every year or so. I took advantage of the PU discounted rate, and for the discounted rate, this is an excellent deal. Happy viewing!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great model interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not at all shy
Improved site layout and navigation
Token based login (remembers you)
4 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 6000x4000 pixels
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation much better but still a little quirky
Videos are a sometimes bit snoozy
Bottom Line:
This is my third review of this site in about 6 years, and I'm happy to say that, with an improved layout, better file size options and less inhibited models, it is better than ever.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best.
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on the number of sets, but it is now up to about 5000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last 4 years. The pre-2010 sets tend to be a little more "Naked girl in the woods" but for the past several years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in many different poses...standing, reclining, come-hithering, you name it. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Photographer interaction with the model is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward, ugly or uncomfortable anywhere. The photographers here are simply the best in the industry. They start with beautiful women and turn them into breathtaking goddesses. Stefan Soell, for example, manages to regularly find and photograph some of humanity's finest examples of the female form in some of the most beatiful settings on earth. And the other photographers are just as good, providing you with uncluttered, nicely focused, obstruction- free, mostly prop-free views of beautiful, confident, 100% natural women.
Just a reminder that this is relatively soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and a few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want harder core in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views from every angle of great looking models. In the past few years, the sets have become somewhat more explicit. That is a huge change from prior years and adds another level to the awesomeness of these models.
The videos usually follow the pattern of a similar photo shoot. They are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. There are a few close-ups, etc., but there is usually no masturbation. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (480p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
The photo sets typically have about 80-120 images in them and the images can be downloaded individually or in zip files of the whole set. Image sizes in the recent zips range from a now-puny 800 pixels across to a decent poster sized 6000 pixels across. To get the really big images, you have to download the zip file.
Femjoy updated their site layout a couple of years ago and overall it is a huge improvement. Very large set thumbnails include the model name, the set name, the photographer name, the set date and the number of images in the set. The main pages are an uncluttered design with weekly videos on the right, favoriate models toward the bottom and a couple of other sites referenced at the very bottom. There are also pages for just photo sets and pages for just videos. On those pages, you can navigate easily to any month of any year all the way back to 2004. Nicely done. No aggresive partner marketing in your face like so many other sites. There is a search function for models and photographers, a set card for each model and photographer, and a scoring system of 1-5 stars for both the model and the photographer.
The ONLY thing I still have not gotten used to is the in-set navigation. It is much better than before, but there are no options for opening an image in a new window and th eback button doesn't really work. Everything here opens in the original window and if you try to open an image in a new window, some functionality, like image size selection or next/previous is lost. Click on a set and you get nice large thumbnails of all of the images in the set on one page. HUGE PLUS. There is a large X in the upper right hand corner that will get you back to the page you came from. Same with the images. The first time you select an image, you get the smallest size until you chose a different size, then the site remembers that size but only for the current set. And the X in the upper right corner will take you back to the previous page, but it takes you to the TOP of the previous page rather then where you were. A little inconvenient if you are looking at images at the bottom of a set or a set thumbnail at the bottom of a page.
OK, I'm out of room....
Bottom line? If you are into medium-soft core and like young, showy, confident, OMG beautiful young women, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content and good pricing. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months. I will have a subscription here until either the site or I are no longer around.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HUGE Exclusive content
Some exclusive models
Wide variety of models in all shapes and sizes.
Many top European models
Some very early sets of current popular models
Tons of content (Since 2011, over 900 models)
Good quality images
Generally good quality videos
Cons:
Navigation is OK, but sometimes annoying.
Many videos are so so.
Some photo sets are so so.
Some popular models have videos only.
Some models only have one set.
Silly props in some sets.
Many models have assigned names that don't match other sites.
Headshots are sometimes not representative of material.
Individual image file names are not unique.
Bottom Line:
Showy Beauty is a non-Met-Art sister site to Amour Angels. (Some of the sets even have props that say Amour Angels.) This site has pretty much EVERY met-art model, mostly in sets shot before they became uber-popular, plus a bunch of sets of models that only shot one or two sets and maybe a handful that didn't make the cut to be on Met Art for one reason or another. The site is not part of the Met Art network but, as I said, has many models that appear on MA and probably shares several photographers. There is a very broad variety of model here. In addition to several hundred european models, there are a handful of asian models, some south american models and a few (I think) pacific island models. A LOT of models I've never seen elsewhere and I have been around a bit. Most models are young looking and petite, although several are more significant and quite chesty. A veritable smorgasboard of shapes and sizes. There are a lot of popular models here, mostly from early shoots. The majority of the models are shaved but some have very mild or trimmed pubic hair. Models like Emily Bloom and Sarena Woods are on Showy Beauty and there are a few others that you honestly would not recognize at first because they look so different. A few popular Met Art models only have videos here and I suspect that is because the matching photo sets made it to a Met Art site. This is not a B-roll site, exactly, but much of the material is similar to the stuff you would find on the met-art secondary sites. The difference is there is more variety here.
Showy Beauty is fairly true to the name, but don't expect anything too extreme. Each model is different. Some models are modest, some open their legs and a very very few have open labia.
This is JUST a solo girl model site with an occasional two or three girl "friends" set. There is no sex, no masturbation, no insertion. Even eye contact varies quite a bit between sets and models. The emphasis, for the most part, is simply admiration of the beautiful nude female form.
The site is posting images and videos as far back as 2011. They have been posting a photo or video set every other day since then, so that means there are, what, roughly 1200+ sets. There are over 750 models. It is a LOT of material. You can sort by top models, top sets or update date and you can go directly to a specific year and month. Sets are dated and model and photographer names are listed. (About 90 photographers, some of whom I am sure shoot for other major sites.) Models are ranked on a user-generated 10 point scale, but the scale seems pretty whacky to me. Most models are in the 5 to 7 range and many top Met Art models are toward the bottom of the rankings. This may be because the sets of the top models are not as high quality or revealing or just because not very many people vote. There are a LOT of pretty teen models here. Like Met Art and some similar sites, Showy Beauty gets content from many photogaphers so there is a great deal of variety in sets, lighting etc., but image quality is typically very good.
Navigation is generally good and download speeds are good but the site is a little clunky at times. Photo sets are presented in multiple pages and there is no way to change it. Navigation "Buttons" throughout the site change color when you hover over them, but they do nothing unless you click on the actual text within the button you want. Super annoying. Zip files have unique names but individual images, either downloaded or in the zip files, don't. File names are "Showy Beauty-001.jpg" to Showy Beauty-xxx.jpg, telling you nothing about the set, model, date, etc. Very frustrating if you keep a "best of" folder. ALL items...sets, models, images, etc., open in the same page so you are single threaded and have to ckick "back" a lot unless you remember to open in a new tab.
Because these models are not very experienced, many sets have little or rather tentative eye contact. There is a fair amount of outdoor "girl in the woods" type shooting. Most more recents sets are very well done with plenty of eye contact and, sometimes, fairly revealing poses. Images come in three sizes and videos come in 4 formats (2 mp4 sizes, a WMV and a DIVX format) plus streaming. The resolution of the videos is not listed,although the few files I pulled down were 720 or better. Ther is no 4K. Image sets have from about 70 to about 180 images. Videos are 10-20 minutes with the model undressing and frolicking around. Honestly, the videos are not terribly exciting but the view is usually pretty good.
Bottom Line: If your tastes run toward young, psuedo-amatuer or early-career pro models of all shapes and sizes, then this is a site you should visit. There is a TON of material and some of it is quite good. I searched for discounts and found one for $19.95. At that price, there is a lot to like here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Generally high quality material
Beautiful, natural models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Many solo masturbation/insertion and girl/girl scenes.
Very "artsy" site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Several popular European models
Good navigation
Cons:
Very "artsy" site.
Billed as a "kink" site but just kink costumes
Very little model eye contact with camera
Creative edge takes precedent over practicality
Landing page focus is on cross-selling live site
Entire site including all sets are very dark!
Many sets in black and white or oddly tinted
Many shorter sets
Many models only have a set or two
There are more tattoos here than other Met-art sites. (not always bad, but not good on otherwise beautiful models)
Seems like some is B-roll from other sites
The unified login system on the metart network has become a NIGHTMARE!
Bottom Line:
Stats (Deduced):
1 new update a day
Some older sets are not exclusive
The site has been around since 2009 but some of the sets pre-date that.
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, some tattoos, etc. Some are unique to this site.
At some point, MetArt decided to make this more of a fetish network, but it isn't really a fetish network at all. There are some fetish costumes and a few girls that start lightly tied up or wearing fetish clothing (in SOLO sets). Many of the sets are female masturbation sets that range from boring to pretty interesting. And about 10% are girl/girl scenes. I need to say that the majority of these are very conservative sets with few money or close-up shots. (There are some Oh My God models, but they are not necessarily doing OMG things....) There are notable exceptions, though. It depends on the model, I guess. There also is a wide mix of eye contact. Some sets have models that never make any eye contact with the camera at all. Most of the sets start out with the model(s) clothed. I noticed some models remained clothed for 75% or more of some sets.
The first thing that strikes me about this site is how dark it is. Everything is dark. The site, the sets, the lighting, the videos, EVERYTHING! Older sets are a little better in this regard, but you will generally think there is something wrong with your display. Newer images are dark, contrasty, very shadowy. Distracting. Annoying. Generally awful. I batched a couple of sets through Photoshop and auto-adjust increased the brightness in most images by 50% or more. That is a heck of a lot and it is not accidental. They are deliberately turning down the brightness on these sets. You have to work to make images this dark. Really work.
The second thing I noticed was how hard the webmasters are trying to get you to go to the live site. There is a large section on the right half of th elanding page that highlights active working cam models.
Another thing is the almost complete lack of playfulness, compassion or interaction with the viewer in many of the sets. Some of these models have all of the expressions of a check-out girl at K-Mart, meaning none. Even models that normally shine are somehow less expressive here. This is not in any way erotic as the name implies.
And the last thing to note is how inconsistent many of the sets are. More recent sets seem to follow that dark psuedo-kinky theme for the most part, but some sets are not like that at all. Some sets are very short, some are filled with close-ups, some are not. Some girls are almost entirely fully clothed for the whole set, some are not clothed at all. Some have eye-contact, many do not. If you are familiar with other Met-Art sets, you can see that some of these sets seem like they might have been B-roll or too weird to put on Met-Art.
Navigation is generally good. There is an options section that allows you to set defaults for image size, number of thumbnails on a page, etc. like some other Met Art sites. The search function has user defined tags, which helps if you are looking for a particular trait that others are likely to define, like ginger or spread. But it could be better. There is also a consolidated MetArt web site control at the very top of the page, but it does not work very well....
I've had HUGE issues with passwords and common access across MetArt sites. The pull down menu will say I am a member of 6 sites,for example, but when I try to access them, something breaks. Every time I add a new site or have to reset my common password, I lose access to one or more of the 6 or so sites I've signed up for for and pay for. Sometimes it take DAYS and dozens of email exchanges to get it all fixed again. I'm not sure what the issue is but it appears to be related to the different credit card service providers MetArt uses.
Bottom line? Good site to visit once, I guess. I personally don't like it anywhere near as much as other Met Art sites. You can actually see the weird evolution/devolution from a site similar to Met Art in the beginning to a site that now looks more like a bad graphic novel than a soft-core porn site. There is a decent amount of material here and some of it is pretty good, but be prepared to sift through a lot of dark, odd and often slightly off pictures to find things that really float your boat.
I wish I could be more enthusiastic, but this site just doesn't live up to Met-Art standard
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content
Some exclusive models
Many "petite" top European models
Site claims no silcone, all natural.
Some very early sets of current popular models
Tons of content (Since 2006!)
Decent navigation
Over 320 models
Many of the models seem to be having fun.
Good quality images
Generally good quality videos
Cons:
Site design is a little busy
Navigation could be better.
Many videos are rather slow when watching.
Constant use of teen and pre-teen props can get old.
Although all models were legal age when the shoots were done, some sets do seem a little borderline.
Bonus site is marginal.
Bottom Line:
Amour Angels follows a fairly specific formula in that it often attempts to portray its models in a very innocent, young or teen-oriented way. The models are generally very young looking and very petite, mostly A or B-cups although several are larger, and the sets and props help promote that type of fantasy. Most of the time, this portrayal can be very effective. The majority of the models are shaved but some have very mild or trimmed pubic hair. Many of the models here are also on other sites like Met Art, but here they look or are made to look younger. This is in part because many of these models WERE younger, probably just 18+ and just starting out when these sets were shot. A great example is a model named Marika on this site. She is petite and looks extremely young in sets from 2016 with a more mature looking set from 2017. Today she is a featured model on Watch4Beauty who goes by the name of Helga Grey. Other models like Emily Bloom and Sarena Woods are on Amour Angel with several sets from very early in their careers and a few more current sets.
Note that this is JUST a solo girl model site with an occasional two or three girl "friends" set. There is no sex, no masturbation, no insertions and very little spreading, although many sets do include fully spread legs. The emphasis, for the most part, is on the beauty of innocence.
The teeny-bopper effect is achieved by the use of primary colors, props like lolli-pops and hooded pajamas, striped leggins and tights, rainbows and hearts, chocolate, etc. Many of the sets don't include any specific props like this and would probably be just as home on another site like Met-Art, except that the models, as hard to believe this is possible, are even more petite. Just find the youngest looking girls on a Met Art or similar site and chances are good they are here.
The site is posting images and videos as far back as 2006. They have been posting a photo or video set every other day since then, so that means there are, what, roughly 1600+ sets. There are over 320 models. It is a LOT of material. You can sort by top models, top sets or update date and you can always go directly to a specific year and month. Sets are dated and model and photographer names are listed. (At least 120 photographers, some of whom I am sure shoot for other major sites.) Models are ranked on a user-generated 10 point scale. There are top models of the month and year and profiles of new models. Like Met Art and some similar sites, Amour Angels gets content from many photogaphers so there is a great deal of variety in sets, lighting etc., but set quality is typically very good.
Navigation is good and download speeds are good but the site is a little more ornate or busy than most due in part to the teeny-bopper them.
Older material is sort of "girl in the woods" with just posing and varying levels of eye contact. More recents sets are very well done with plenty of eye contact and fairly revealing poses. Images come in three sizes and videos come in 4 formats (2 mp4 sizes, a WMV and a DIVX format) plus streaming. Oddly, the resolution of the videos is not clearly listed,although the few files I pulled down were 720 or better. Ther is no 4K. Image sets have from about 40 to about 130 images. Videos are 10-30 minutes with the model undressing and frolicking around.
Oh, there is a bonus site called "Teen Art Club" that appears to be similar material but much, much older,perhaps the prior generation of this site. The largest images on Teen Art Club are 1024 by 682, there are no videos and I don't recognize any of the models.
Bottom Line: If your tastes run toward young, petite models then this is a site you should visit. There is a TON of material and some of it is quite good. I joined after searching for discounts and finding one for $19.95. At that price, there is a lot to like here.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site has been around since before 2005!
Excellent selection of top-tier, beautiful models
Exclusive content
Many of the most popular European models with a few specatcular exclusive models.
Several exclusive latin/ethnic models.
Models are open and uninhibited.
Lots of eye contact with the camera.
EVERY photo set has an acompanying video.
Navigation is generally very good
Multiple zip and video resolution options.
Multiple display options.
Available file size is up to 5600k
Most videos are now up to 1080p with some 4k.
All sets, including zips and videos, are uniquely named.
Cons:
Not much here.
Only 1 update every 2-3 days. (15 sets a month)
Navigation could be a little better.
There are a few "unconventional" beauties.
Sets are not dated on every thumbnail screen.
Bottom Line:
This is a mostly a solo girl site but there are a few things that make it different.
First, every photo set comes with a "behind the scenes" video. I'm usually not a big fan of videos taken during photo shoots, but these videos shed a little light on the models by showing personalities and interactions as well as shedding light on the photo shoot process. Any wannabe nude photographer should watch some of these.
Second, the girls in most of these sets are not shy in any way. We're talking legs-spread-so-far-their-toes-are-beyond-different-horizons open. Many of the sets are orgasm sets with spreading, insertions, giant two prong vibrators, etc. This is not Met Art. It's not even Sex Art. It is a place where many of those models go beyond softcore but still manage to look absolutely fantastic. Some of the girl/girl scenes are also very well done. Some of these sets make the girls look like sisters, but a few are really impressive. Clearly these girls are into each other, which makes it that much more interesting to watch.
Third, the photography. It is outstanding. Every inch of every model is in focus. None of that artsy-fartsy old-school soft-focus stuff here. Although they get pretty creative sometimes, you will NEVER see a model dressed like Marie Antoinette on this site. You will never see a set where the lighting is filtered through window blinds so you can't see the model. Every set...every inch...of every model...from pretty much every angle. Damn, that's nice. Now, there are occasionally instances where that is a mixed thing. Sorry in advance for the visual... There is one slender model with unbelievable breasts and an O-ring shaped labia. She actually lactates in one of her videos. Because they don't airbrush anything, you can see that her skin is fairly translucent so you can see veins. It's initally.....conflicting. In the end, the girls assets win and you will still want her, though. OK, enough of that!
Navigation is good, but it could be better. I think it is likely that the site just outgrew it. There are tags, but not user tags and you can't search on them. There are years worth of sets here but you can't, for example, go to the updates from June of 2014. You have to scroll back, sequentially, to get back that far. You can search on models and there is a model bio page for each model.
For sets, you pick a set and the page goes to the set with a cover photo, the video and between 45 and 90 images. Click on an image and it opens in a new "Viewing" window. Click on another image and the "viewing" window changes to the new image. Depending on the size image you chose, you can then click on the image to make it full size. You can always right click and open images in new windows if you want. This navigation style is better than most sites, but it could be improved. It would also be great to be able to more easily view the older material by allowing navigation to specific months. Of course, to do that, every set will need to have a date-stamp.
Oh, there is a blog section that highlights activities, new models and shoots. It can be interesting, but it ussually helps to show you models that are coming. Kind f a tease.
I have had an annual subscription to this site for a couple of years now and it is easily in my top 3 or 4. The site is huge now, so I'm scoring it up there with Met Art, Femjoy, Sex Art, Hegre and MPL Studios. The content is every bit as good as those sites.
I can't quite get a read on site stats because they are not published, but I will make estimates:
2378 sets/videos
about 250 models
I would have scored this site higher except for the minor navigation issues and the fact that it does not update daily. But the quality photography and videography still puts it among my top 3 or 4.
Bottom line: If you like solo models on sites like Met Art, Sex Art, Femjoy, JoyMii, MPLStudios and Hegre and are looking for something a little more hardcore, this is absolutely worth a visit.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality video and photos of sex scenes and solo scenes. Many Met-Art models but a lot less tame.
Excellent production quality.
Excellent navigation.
Part of the Met Art Network so you know what to expect.
Terrific customer service.
Excellent download speeds
Multiple image size and video file formats
settable user options for navigation and viewing (like Met Art)
All sets are named and dated.
Cons:
Really very few.
Marketing for the webcam partner is very prominent and the auto-dropdown for this is truly annoying.
They've starting this odd bait tactic called "Staff Selection", where they insert a preview video in prominent locations (it looks just like a set). You click on it and discover it is only a preview. Then they want to SELL you the video separately from your membership. The ad for the most recent video-for-sale shows up on every single set listing page. I truly hope this dies quickly. The videos are no different from other Met-Art network videos and this practice is so annoying that it makes me want to quit the site.
Many of the sex videos are highly stylized. (surreal as opposed to real)
Many of the solo models lose eye contact with the camera when they start getting into themselves.
Bottom Line:
As a frame of reference, I am a very, very long term member of Met Art and a couple of other sites in the network, but I recently realized I have not been a member of Sex Art since 2012. I'm happy to say a lot has changed on this site since 2012!
The site uses the tagline "Erotoc Cinema for discerning adults" but there are far more image sets than there are videos. For me, that isn't a bad thing at all.
As others have said, this is Met Art, only harder. Here you will find nearly all of the models you would see at Met Art, except here the no touching, no fingering, no inserting, no spreading, and no boy-girl fucking rules are gone. Many of the models are still just solo, but they are much more open. Much.
Somebody mentioned back in 2013 or so that they were doing anal on this site. I did not notice any Anal scenes and a search for anal only brought up a few things from 2013. I don't really care for anal so this is a good thing on my list. Just so you know...no anal here.
If you are a Met-Art subscriber, have you ever clicked on a thumbnail because the image looked great only to find that the lower half of the model is completley out of focus? Well, that sort of depends on the photographer but I can tell you that here it doesn't happen nearly as much. Many of the images here are sharp from head to toe and every bit as good, sometimes better than those at Met Art.
The models, of course, are Met Art quality, top notch European models. Nearly all are in the 18 to 25 category. Generally slender, some are curvy and some are OMFG gorgeous. They seem a little more playful here with a little more eye contact. And when you throw in that these sets include a lot more shots of, for example, fingering, spreading and generally open labia, then this site becomes a lot more pleasant. Many of the girls do tend to forget about the camera when they start getting into themselves, though. This is fairly common for models that are not full-out porn stars.
The videos are sort of a mixed bag and I'm not entirely sure why. Met Art in general tends to stylize their videos and many of these are theme based. The sex in many of these videos is ok, but it doesn't draw you in and hold you like more hardcore stuff can. (There are some notable exceptions, though, where the guy just bangs the hell of the girl like there ar no cameras at all...and it is really good.) Some of the solo scenes are also very good, starting with a stroll down the beach or something and ending with a vibrator induced orgasm with a lot of close-ups along the way. Is it real? Who cares! It often looks pretty real! The girl/girl scenes are also much more realistic, with the girls clearly performing acts on eachother, as opposed to just holding hands and looking like they are sisters, again with an ample number of close-ups along the way.
Here are some quick stats (from what I can figure): As of 2/23/18
895 videos
1,259 photo sets
549 models
49 photographers/videographers
One new set every day.
As far as niche, that is difficult to define. I would put it in with Watch4Beauty.com or maybe MPLstudios as both of those sites use popular, beautiful Eauropean models and put no restrictions on activities.
Bottom line: If you like the models at Met Art but are looking for something a little more open, a little more exposed, a little harder, then this is the site you are looking for. I would say join for a month, but honestly, there is way too much good material here, so take a longer term deal if you can find it. I may add this to my annual subscription list.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very Entertaining site
Newscasters of every age, shape and ethnicity
You can download and keep the newscasts
pricing is good.
Cons:
Can be a little monotonous sometimes.
A few of the newscasters are not great newscasters.
Slightly higher percentage of tattoos than I'm used to. (personal preference only)
Bottom Line:
OK, first off, the site is EXACTLY what it is named. Naked News. It is not a porn site, exactly... The newscasters don't have sex and don't do anything more than strip. But... I watch an hour of regular news every morning at 6AM and many of the same stories are on the day's production of Naked News at 7PM. But I have to say it is MUCH more entertaining to watch the 7PM show. This site has been producing news for nearly 2 decades (December, 1999!) so clearly they are doing something right!
Naked News is a softcore site with primary focus on the day's events in a newscasting environment. The only difference between this and a broadcast news show is that the newsgirls strip as the newscast progresses. There are different segments like headlines (called bulletins), sports, movies/hollywood and there is even a travel segment along with guest interviews with porn stars and nude models.
There are 6 HD shows a week and the shows last about 20-25 minutes. You can sign up to get an email when the show is released if you want and the show can be streamed or downloaded in one piece or just in the segments you want. The production quality is every bit as good as most national news shows.
I gave the site an 85 because, although it is one of only two sites in this genre that I know of (the other is a not-so-great Playboy branded production), this site does what it does very well. Just DO NOT expect anything other than what the name implies.
Honestly, a few of these women would make terrific regular news anchors, but they are probably having way more fun doing this. And some of the news interview and remote segments are so good you would not know they were not on broadcast TV.
Let me ask you this. Do you have a favorite news show? Is there a hot newscaster on that show? Well, if the answer is yes, it is because that show has tweaked the newscasting formula to keep you watching. Naked news does the same thing, only they aren't sly about it. They KNOW why you are watching.
There are a few ancillary features of the site also, like a cam site, snapchat subscriptions and even clothing optional vacation options like a naked cruise to Alaska! They have some interesting streaming options, too, like a subscription to watch the show on Roku.
Downside? Well, sometimes they have guest or audition newscasters that are a little rough in one way or another. And once in a while I skip a segment because I don't like the look of the newscaster (personal preference again). And there will be times, maybe, when the news is actually more interesting than the naked girl talking about it.
Bottom line: This is a different kind of site. It isn't porn but it IS entertainment. If you watch the news regularly like I do, but you don't like the boring way news is sometimes presented, than this might be a great site for you. Or...if you just hate watching regular news but feel it is important to stay informed. Ta Da! Naked News is PERFECT for you!
After watching it for over a month, I've found a good balance between actually watching the news and watching the generally hot newscasters strip down to their fully shaved nothings. I don't think you will never find a more entertaining news show! Try it for a month at the discounted price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few attractive models.
2 models you've seen that are now pretty popular
Decent number of sets
Newer videos are full HD (1080)
Straightforward navigation
A few pretty good videos
(I'm really..um..stretching here to find Pros)
Cons:
No dates on sets
No indication of frequency of updates
Mediocre photography
Older sets have no video or really poor video
Several of the "Naked Gymnasts" aren't naked
Very basic navigation
Image downloads in one size (medium or small)
Many videos are SD
No model pages or search.
Site layout and design is ancient.
Bottom Line:
This was a clone site for Naked Gymnast, which apparently is gone, but this site is identical. My original review was for NG, but since that site is gone, all of the reviews are gone also. So...I'm writing an updated review here.
I saw a couple of very nice sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today. Even among sites in this niche, this site is sub-par and a little less than truthful in the way it presents material.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com. Many say naked-gymnast, which was a clone site.
The models are typically young, but there is an odd lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are neither gymnastic nor flexy and certainly not sexy, just strange. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...maybe it is gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam. Most girls start out dressed and in some sets the girl stays dressed. Oh, and for most models there is little to no eye contact with the camera. That is a significant factor in the clinical feel.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio. And unlike pretty much every other model on this site, these models know how to look sexy...and how to look at the camera.
Here's another gauge. I just looked to see what I saved from the 500+ sets on this site. 6 photo sets and 6 videos from 4 girls I considered attractive (two were the ones I mentioned above, more recently at Met Art.). The rest were totally forgettable.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it is a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but for $30 this site is not worth visiting by itself. There are better sites in this niche for your money.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of popular porn stars and models of all ages, shapes and sizes but a lot of D-cups and above. (i.e. curvy girls)
Perhaps one of the last "Glam-core" porn sites but with a lot of extra stuff like insertions.
Very high quality all-in-focus images
Mostly solo but some G/G and B/G
Good quality videos that include masturbation.
Several newer sets/videos that are full-on hardcore.
Several download sizes/formats for images and videos.
2+ updates a week.
Affiliated with the Met Art network
Great navigation (search on Model name, tags, etc.)
All sets dated.
Cons:
Number of images in a set is sometimes rather small.
Some of the porn-star models are rather mature...
Some older sets seem a little monotonous (same shoot sequence formula).
Some newer sets may be unreleased older sets.
Bottom Line:
If you don't know who Holly Randall is, she is a 2nd generation past nude model and current erotic photographer. She and her mother both shot for Playboy as well as several other magazines like Hustler. They practically invented that trademark large format everything is in focus image style that was/is common in those publications. She has shot for websites as well, like Twistys. She has won all kinds of awards for her photography and videography - awards she totally deserved.
I haven't been a member of Holly Randall since 2012, so I thought I would join to see what has changed and to collect the best of the 6 years of material that has accumulated since I was last here. I was not at all disappointed. The sets, models, make-up, lighting and image quality are all excellent, just like I remember.
The glam look is still there, too. I really like that done-up look and whoever is doing the doing-up here, um, knows what they are doing without over-doing it. Models you know, like Connie Carter and Candice Luca, look like a million bucks. Every pose is perfect. Nothing is out of place or overlooked.
Just take the best from Met-Art or Femjoy and turn up the glam a little bit. That's Holly Randall.
Couple of things I really like about this site.
In almost every set, there is nearly 100% eye contact. None of that voyeur, girl-in-the-woods or innocent looks into the distance crap. These women are all looking at you because they know exactly why you are looking at them. Nice power play.
There are a few close-ups in every set, but they are almost unnecessary because the sets flow naturally and already show everything. Some photographers on other sites (Met Art, for example) tend to add close-ups into sets as sort of an afterthought. On Holly Randall, the girl is making eye contact and striking many different poses with progressive levels of openness. Also, and this is huge, Holly knows how to use depth of field so EVERYTHING you want to see is in focus in almost every image, from her eyes to her high-heels and everything in between. None of that six shots focused on her face and one identical shot focused ONLY on her not-face nonsense. (I really don't like it when a photographer uses depth of field to tell you where to look.) Here you get the whole picture, all in focus and you get to look wherever you want in every image.
What's new since my last visit is the affiliation with Met Art, which has brought an updated and improved web site. Holly Randall is not on the Met Art pull-down sites menu, though....not sure why.
The site has been around since before 2009, but that is as far back as the sets go. Figure 15 sets a month for over 9 years, that's about 1600-1700 sets. Of course, the older ones are not in today's image resolution, but they still aren't bad. Around 2012, the site started to go a little harder. Many sets include an image or two with spreading, fingering, insertions and/or masturbation and the more recent sets almost always have them.
So....what's not to like? Well, there really isn't much. Some tiny things, really. Like although navigation is generally the same as it is on other Met Art sites, you can't set your preferences so images in a set show up in a new window. Big deal. Maybe a few of the porn-stars are a little past their prime (but Holly makes them look awesome). Not a deal killer. Occasionally, images are a little grainy or soft. Might be because they have ben resized? Not sure. Also not a deal killer. Ok, here's one. The sets are sometimes pretty small. Some are only 40 images or so. But when that happens, the images you get are usually very good. Most sets are at least 50 images and some are nearly 100. And lastly, there may be some photoshopping here and there, but I don't think it is obvious.
Ok, bottom line. If you like glam-style images of past and preset popular models and porn stars (like the images from Twisty's), then this is a site you really have to visit. Unlike Twisty's this site is easy to navigate and is managed by a highly reputable group. The only reason I am only giving it an 85 is because of the more mature models/pornstars that are not my taste.
It has taken me a couple of weeks to sift through all the material that has accumulated on this site since my last visit several years ago and I downloaded a lot, which says a lot.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The ultimate reference for every naked actress scene in every A/B and foreign movie ever made.
Good site navigation and search functions.
Auto-login
Montages by topic (steam rooms, GOT, tiny girls, best boobs, year in review, etc.)
Some scenes are slowed down and enhanced for lighting, etc.
Cons:
Not really a porn site, per se, but still...
Videos are streaming only
A few current scene examples have blurred bits.
A few scenes a not on the site.
Older movie scenes, of course, are lower resolution.
Still images are, of course, video caps.
If you are looking for nude actors, this is not the site you are looking for. None here.
Bottom Line:
The site slogan, "Fast forward to the good bits" is totally accurate. Every actress you've ever been enamored by is here in the most naked scene she is in. Alexandra Daddario? Check. Margot Robbie? Check. Turns out very, very few popular actresses have NOT done some kind of nude scene at one point or another. Now, there are a few teases here. A few actresses have had doubles or have been filmed in a way that doesn't really show much, but a lot of the fun is in watching the little montages that they put together and going "Wow, SHE did a nude scene?" And, of course, the best use of the site is when you spot a particularly attractive actress and wonder "Hmmm. I wonder what she looks like naked?" Whoever she is, if she has ever been naked in a film, chances are excellent that Mr. Skin has the clip that answers your question.
To be clear, this is not a site where you will get completely off on watching nude scenes of popular actresses...well...most of the time, it is more like a collection of reasons to go Hmm, Ah, or wow and fully appreciate how awesome many of these actresses are.
It is worth noting that this site catalogs actresses only. No actors. For example the reference for Movie Wild Things shows about 6 scenes of the actresses but the full frontal scene of Kevin Bacon in the shower is absent. (I suppose there is a Mrs. Skin?)
There are also a few nude scenes that are somewhat disturbing, or at least mood ruining. Scenes from horror movies or those odd cinematic cases where they move between a love scene and a bloody war scene, for example.
Can you find many of these scenes elsewhere on the Internet for free? Well, maybe, but they won't be as good quality, as easily found or cross referenced like they are here.
Bottom line: They are offering lifetime subscriptions for $99. I bought one.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few pretty good videos.
Some top models/porn stars
Good layout
Good navigation
All videos are tagged (180,360,male POV, Voyeur POV) and you can search by tag
Cons:
Fully half of the videos are "Voyeur" POV, i.e. VR observational, not participatory.
Video quality varies a lot (upscaling?)
Video format varies a lot
Searching by tag doesn't always work.
Release dates are not listed (although x months ago is shown)
Nearly all of the photo sets are marketing related. A large number of the images include somebody wearing a VR headset...
Several videos are tagged "moving 180" which means the camera moves around a lot on these non-POV videos. (basically a regular porn video shot in 3d.)
Bottom Line:
I think somebody decided they wanted to build a top-notch VR porn site so they put a lot of pieces together including a pretty good website. But then they ran into problems, at least initially, developing and acquiring content. The site has about 86 videos as of 12/28/17. I can't quite tell how many of each type of video the site has (because the tags don't work correctly), but if I had to guess, I'd say there are about 30 Male POV (participatory) videos, 30 non-POV (observational) VR videos, maybe 15 2D videos and 2-4 female POV videos. The last 5 videos offered are all "voyeur POV" meaning they are observational only.
Video length varies from about 10 minutes up to about 28 minutes.
File sizes for the Oculus/Vive range from about 2 gigs to nearly 6 gigs.
Download speeds are OK.
There is roughly one new video a week.
The site has some top-tier porn-stars here and they even have a VR video with Nina Hartley, who I haven't seen in a decade or so. Adria Rae, Chloe Amour, Riley Reid, Abella Danger, Megan Rayne and Adrianna Chechick, to name a few.
So, all of the pieces are there for this to be a pretty good site. But....it falls a little short in my book for a couple of reasons.
First, the videos vary quite a bit. Some are side by side, some are over under, some are 360 and some are 180. Many ore observational and not participatory which, no offence to those who like the voyeur style, defeats the purpose of VR porn in my book. And the biggest issue for me is that many of them are difficult to watch because they are either in lower resolution or where not encoded properly. I have an HTC Vive and only a couple of the videos I downloaded are in high enough resolution to actually enjoy.
My theory is that they purchase VR and other videos from independents who use different methods of filming and encoding. This inconsistency wouldn't be a terrible thing if the end result was a good quality video, but often it isn't. All of the great porn stars in the world don't mean much if you can't comfortably watch the video.
I have well over 400 VR videos now and I have not had any kind of viewing issue since building a new high-end computer a year or so ago. But some of these videos are hard to watch because of resolution or lens or encoding issues. So far, I've downloaded 23 videos (most of the male POV videos) and although the content looks OK, there is something wrong with the Vive versions. I have to say, though, that the 2 or 3 that ARE encoded correctly are very well done, so maybe it is just a Vive thing. Still, I can't really dismiss the poor quality videos because I signed up to use them with my Vive, so the review rating reflects this issue. I am also not into the "Voyeur POV" style, which is about half of the videos on this site.
If you are using something other than a Vive, this site is probably worth signing up to for a month, especially if you are equally into the "voyeur POV" and male POV video styles. They do have an A-list of porn stars here, but be prepared for a wide variety of shooting styles, lens types, etc.
I'll provide an update if anything changes in terms of Vive video quality.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Relatively large collection of VR videos
(Roughly 270 videos!!!!)
Attractive, young actresses
Several popular internet actresses
Good quality videos
Several formats available
Navigation is pretty good
Thumbs-up scoring
Tags like POV, Anal, etc, for each set.
Videos are Lovense compatible (although I haven't had the pleasure of trying it)
They also have "interactive" videos, which apparently allow you to change the story line, options, positions, skip the foreplay, etc. in some videos.
Download speeds are very good.
Cons:
Videos are not dated
Some Very troublesome and non-standard formats
Proprietary player is difficult to get working, is clunky and does not work consistently for the Vive. For example you have to use a keyboard or an xBOX controller instead of the VR native controls that come with your device. It was a total waste of time for me.
The alternative to the proprietary format is to choose "previous versions" and pull down the much larger H264 videos.)
The site doesn't really explain that the proprietary player is only needed (I think) if you want to run the videos in interactive mode, or use the related sex-toys.
As it turns out, the interactive videos don't work on the Vive anyway.
Bottom Line:
Virtual Real Porn is among the best of the VR web sites with a relatively large number of high-quality videos. By themselves, many of these videos are as good or better than videos from the other top VR sites, but the site has developed a custom video player that, I think, is designed to allow you to use Cyber-toys like the Lovense for men or women. This is a pretty neat concept and if you have used something like a fleshlight, then these toys will probably add a dimension to VR that isn't there for other sites.
All of the videos have a fairly well-developed premise, secretary, student, friends girlfriend, whatever, and the videography is excellent. The girls are all pretty young, mostly fit, and of various nationalities. There are many well-known actresses here, as well as many that you've never seen before but want to see again.
Most of these videos start out in POV mode with the observer laying, sitting or standing. A few videos start out in non-POV with both the female and male actors in the scene, but then it switches to POV. There are also a lot of female solo scenes and a handful of scenes where you are observing a couple having sex. The POV scenes mostly eventually have the viewer in a prone position and the scenes often end in a hand job.
As for the technology, I have a Vive and eventually gave up on the proprietary player and went back and pulled down the H264 videos that will play on most platforms. These H264 videos are much larger than the "VP9" format videos, but they typically look better and do not have the bizarre doubling artifacts that some of the VP9 videos have. (You can find the H264 videos unser "previous version" in each headset selection. In this regard, the site really needs to improve both the selection of video of video formats and the consistency of video coding.
Navigation is pretty good, with the ability to select by model, likes or date, you can also search on some of the tags, like threesome or anal.
A simple introduction to the site explaining what options are available for the various headsets, what the interactive thing is all about and maybe a few other pointers would have been incredibly helpful.
Overall, I would probably have rated this site higher had I not spent so much time trying to get the proprietary video player running on my Vive. Many of the videos are among the best in VR and most of the actresses are quite attractive. If you are into VR porn, then you really need to add this site to your visit list.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans...all of them are fit.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Mostly studio shoots with minimal props.
Navigation, search and voting (with "likes") are all pretty good.
Extra features of the site include orgasm videos, tantric massage and some "tutorials" that you have to see to appreciate.
Daily updates.
Images available in up to 10000k!
Nearly 300,000 images!
Sets dating back to 2002.
Cons:
The photography, which is about 80% of what goes on at the site, is often studio work shot in a plain, white studio. This is intended to show off the models, which are often amazing, but it can get a little monotonous sometimes.
Bottom Line:
Hegre.com, formerly Hegre-Art.com, is an excellent softcore photography site with some interesting and remarkable features. It differs from a lot of other sites in that Peter Hegre usually just wants to show you how amazing the female form can be. He does this very, very well! The girls are generally beautiful and the photography is often stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent.
This site is dominated by really well done single model photo shoots and softcore single-model videos. Most of the models are stunning and the photography is among the best anywhere. The models are probably mostly 20-25 with a few 18 year olds in the mix. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all ethnicity, often very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here) and generally very fit. (I just looked through the last few months of sets and can not find a single model that doesn't look like she wakeboards or kite-surfs....translation...not an ounce of fat on any of these models anywhere. Really. None!)
Models are usually completely nude throughout the set, but the shoots are conservative, meaning very few close-ups, spread eagles, etc.
(Although some sets called explicit really are pretty explicit.) The majority of images are full body, natural pose shots. These models don't need a lot of props or pretense. Unlike a lot of other sites, most of these models don't have a bad side or angle. Still.....I do find myself wishing they would turn around if they are going to pose in a crab or bridge position like that....
There are beach/outdoor scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. Again, these are not romps, but more like showcases for the models and the photographer. It isn't ALSscan because it isn't supposed to be.
.....still, even without overt posing, close-ups, etc., there is often something here that will float your boat. Peter Hegre and his staff are masters at showing the bests of the female form. There are a few pretty exclusive models here that are as amazing as any you will ever see elsewhere and some of the sets and behind the scene videos, like Ana S. standing nude near the Eiffel Tower, are simply unforgettable.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionally done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. There are sessions like this with men, too along with some other unusual sets or videos ending with a male-model orgasm.
There are close to 300,000 images in about 4500 galleries dating back as far as 2002! The images from that time-frame, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or print it out for an image that is over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want to line your closet with life-sized images of amazing women just standing there in totally naked splendor. This site is your nirvana, then.
There are, on average, about 4 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for a place to appreciate the amazing female form for a while. It is every bit as good as Femjoy, Watch4Beauty or MPL studios and at its best may be better than Met-Art. ...just take the massage-orgasm videos as a bonus!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Several very popular Czech nude models here
Site layout is decent
Updates every other day or so.
Top notch photography
Models are tastefully done-up
As the name implies, this is a glamour site.
Cons:
All of the sets are older.
Site sometimes makes you log in again.
Kind of pricey for what you get.
Not all models are fully nude.
Most sets are not very explicit.
Downloads are very, very slow.
Sets are not dated, just numbered.
No original shoot dates.
Bottom Line:
Glamour.CZ is a fairly well done site overall, similar to the photographer-centric sites in the Met Art network, probably most similar to Arrotica Archives. The models are familiar and most are OMG beautiful, Iveta, Little Caprice, Monika Vesela (104 sets!), even a bunch (33 sets) from Marketa Bolonova(which is why I joined). But although the sets are generally very good to excellent, they are older material. Monika and Marketa have not been modeling for at least 8 years, probably more like 10+.
The overall format of the site is model-centric, so if you go to a model page, you will see a listing of all o the sets and some thumbnails. Click on a set and you will see thumbnails of every image in that set.
Most of the sets are not very explicit, although the models do look pretty amazing just posing. Monika Vesela, who is known for relatively explicit sets elsewhere, is for the most part just standing around in most of her 104 sets here. She is quite young in several sets, but they are not in any kind of order. All of Marketa's sets are from later in her career and when she was no longer very explicit. This is well done glam stuff mostly.
This is an image-only site and images come in small and large. Large is 4000x2666. No idea what small is. Downloads are very, very, VERY slow. A 145MB zip file takes about 12 minutes to download. Images take painfully long to display. I can almost hear the modem crackle.
Sets are between 25 and 45 images each and it is fair to say that they break up sets a little....well...a lot.
Overall, this isn't a bad site, especially if you fancy some of the models that they seem to have a lot of. Go browse through the model directory in the free section. If there is anyone there that you lust over, go ahead and sign up.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls here are all beautiful, mostly Eastern European and very popular. If you like the Met-Art or FemJoy networks, you will also like this site. The site has evolved a little, though, and is now featuring several porn stars and starlets that you have seen elsewhere. The videos are well done, dedicated videos. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to disappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done.
Cons:
The overall quality of the images and videos seems to have declined slightly, or, at best, is not keeping up with the standards of other sites. The site format has not been updated in a while and seems a little dated. The number of images in each set has dropped and the highest resolution shots are often upscaled rather than converted from raw files. The site also relies heavily on all-white backgrounds, which was a thing a couple of years ago but seems a little tiresome today.
The site is now breaking out the photo sets and the video sets from a shoot, that used to be one release, into multiple releases. This allows the site to effectively cut the number of shoots in half.
Perhaps the biggest shortcoming that this site has is that it only updates once every 2-4 days. With several other sites updating daily, the potential that this site once had to really compete with the top sites has dulled somewhat.
Bottom Line:
This is a well done site. The photographers and videographers do a very good job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create excellent imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some very good videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set has changed since my last visit and no longer allows you to select size. Instead, you get a full screen image and a zoom button that allows you to zoom in considerably. Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels. Videos come in SD, HD and 4K.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice. Also, several of the more recent image sets are very fuzzy at the high resolution, either because of compression, editing, or both.
Overall, this site could easily fit into the Met Art network as a sex-art clone, or in the Femjoy network as a Joymii clone. There are nicely done photo and video sets, beautiful models and the sex is comparable to the sites I mention above. But the dated format, not-quite-top-tier image quality and less frequent updates mean that this site is no longer one of my top picks. It is still a great site and I highly recommend it, though.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive, high quality videos and images
Extremely attractive, popular young models/porn stars
Mostly US models/porn stars
Mostly slender, fit girls
Good quality photo sets for each video
Once you join, login is automatic via token
Most videos are in 4K, all are at least 1080p
All sets are dated
Cons:
Site is still a little small
Navigation is basic but there is a search function
Careful with the cross-check on sign-up (it resets by itself)
Bottom Line:
Vixen.com is shaping up to be one of the best exclusive video sites on the Internet. I would place it up there with Wow Girls and the Passion-HD/POVD network in terms of overall production quality, but with primarily US models/porn stars. The ONLY reason it isn't a 90 is because it is not a very large collection yet.
All of the young, petite (mostly) US porn stars are here on this site. Leah Gotti, Naomi Woods, Kimmy Granger, Jill Kassidy, Mia Malkava, etc., etc.
Quick stats: (As of 4/4/2017)
72 sets (Video and photos)
41 models
All sets are dated
Sets come in multiple formats up to 4k
All come in at least 1080p
Photo sets are one size (2000x3000)
Sets and models are user-scored
Sets are user-tagged
Mostly straight sex with a few anal scenes
Mostly couples with a few GGB scenes.
Perhaps what sets this site apart, at least in my mind, is the nearly perfect make-up, lighting, sets, photography and videography. I've seen most of these girls elsewhere , but here they are absolutely fucking beautiful. And there are a few I haven't seen elsewhere that are just breathtaking. The videos are very well done with excellent framing and perspective (no across the room shots here!) And the sex is ACTIVE. I mean everything is bouncing or slamming or jiggling active. Absolutely not boring. They even through a little top-down POV sex into many of the videos. Yep, I'm done.
The images are also excellent. There is always an opening strip-scene and then shots mimicking the sex scene, but these are not just screen caps and are not just shot during the video. They are separate, photography oriented sets that could be on Met-Art except here you get spreads and cum shots. And the pornstar is almost always looking at the camera, even when she is in the middle of doing something to her partner. Very nice touch.
Bottom line? The site is still a little small, but it is totally worth the intro price you can find at the site and around the Internet. If you like to watch really beautiful girls getting their lights fucked out in well done, high quality videos and photo sets, then you simply must check this site out.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality videos.
Nice looking models.
More fetish material than expected (if you are into it)
Some of the bonus material is very good.
Sets are dated in both main and bonus sites
Everything is HD back to about 2009
Image zips available for all scenes
Cons:
They try very hard to get you to sign up to the other two 21 networks.
Sex is competent, not necessarily exciting. (i.e. slow...)
More fetish material than expected (if you are not into it).
Filter function is counter-intuitive.
Some of the bonus material is better than some of the main material...
Bottom Line:
21 Sextury is now one of three 21 Network sites that are marketed together but subscribed to separately. There is very little logic regarding which videos end up in which network since they all contain straight and fetish material
Here are the stats I could find (as of 5/10/17)
21 Sextury:
About 9700 sets on main site.
About 2200 female and male actors listed
Sets are all dated
Recent Videos are HD up to 1080p.
Lots of older videos that are not HD.
Videos are scored via thumbs up/down.
Videos are NOT tagged so you don't know if you are watching an anal or fetish video until you are.
You can select anal,for example, in a search filter, but you cannot de-select it.
21 Sextury is the original site in this network and as such it is larger and older than the others.
Overall the quality of newer videos is very good. They are are high quality, well directed and well lit. The actresses are good looking and they come in all shapes, sizes, colors and and ages, but most of them are in the 20-30 range with a few more mature gals. The newer material is along the lines of Wow Girls or Joymii. The older material is....not so much. Much of it seems borrowed from old sites from this company, like Club Sandy.
There is a lot of fetish material here like peeing and anal. I thought 21 Naturals was the foot fetish site, but there is some here, too.
There are some backstage videos that include things like shaving and tweezing eyebrows. Meh. There is some light femdom and lesbian bondage, a few "doctor" videos involving a gyno chair and speculum as well as regular sex, and there is something called Nude Fight Club that is a lesbian wrestle then sex thing. You would think that this would be loser gets pinned and has to do whatever the winner wants, but they didn't think it through the much, so it is "Wrestle a little, tear each other's panties off, start munching and, oh here's a dildo. Interesting to watch once or twice...
There is also a lot of bonus content that is excepts from other sites or straight from DVD.
This content appears regardless of which site you have subscribed to.
One of the frustrating things about this site is how much effort they put into selling you subscriptions on their other two sites. The landing page includes updates from all the sites with a little lock over the ones you can't watch unless you purchase access.
Another surprising frustration is in searching for specific things or models that you like. There is SO MUCH material here that you can't just move through the models page looking for the ones you like. Doing that could take days!
There is NO SEARCH function. Instead, they have
a "filter" system that allows you to select options like anal so the resulting videos include it. But the "filter" is backwards. FILTER means exclude, not include. So if I de-select anal, I should not get anal. Instead, when I deselect anal, all I get is anal! Deselect foot fetish and anal? you get both. In the meantime, if all I want to see is latinas having straight sex, nope. I can choose latinas, but it includes all latina scenes including fetishes, behind the scenes, etc. And the options to select are very limited, so I can't search for videos that have, say, reverse cowgirls in them. Oh and lastly, once you select a video from the filtered list, when you return to the filter page, it has reset so you have to start all over. I apologize for ranting about this, but it is clear that the webmasters don't understand how this should work. Although they've put great effort into search functions, these functions are counter-intuitive and pretty-much useless.
Fortunately, there is a list of network sites in the left column. Micro-site names like Asshole Fever, Gapeland, Lezcuties and Footsie Babes help when searching for some stuff.
When you scroll through the models (pornstars) pages, you will see a lot of great looking girls (and guys), many of whom have different names than what you might expect. You can sort by most recent, most viewed, highest rated or alphabetical order. Only "most recent" gives you any idea of the age of a model or set. "Highest Rated" includes several models that have been out of the business for many, many years among the top 20. Also, the dates of the releases often do not reflect the dates of the videos. Bonus videos released recently might actually be videos that are 10+ years old.
Some are straight from DVD and many are not HD.
Bottom line is that there is a lot of material here and much of it is very good. There is a significant amount of fetish material here also.
But be prepared for your favorite models to have names that are different than you are used to. This, and the odd non-filter, means you will have to look very hard to find your favorites.
The site is worth it for a month, especially when you can find it at a discount, but the frustrations start to outweigh the pleasures by the end of your first month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge quantity of material.
Many popular models here.
Body types tend toward curvy/larger breasts.
Generally one release a day
Newer videos are good and in HD.
Newer photo sets come in high resolution.
Mostly solo/lesbian site but some newer B/G scenes.
The girls appear to be having genuine fun.
Videos are dated.
Cons:
Site design, presentation and navigation is horrible.
No search functions
Some releases are actually re-posts, remastered or previously unpublished sets of older material dating back as far as 2001.
Teeny-tiny thumbnails for photo shoots.
The narrow range of sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes things a little monotonous after a while.
Rather than break sets up into fetish types, each set includes the full range of material for each model (strip to speculum or whatever)
The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here.
Un-named billing service posts site name on CC.
Bottom Line:
I haven't been a member of Als Angels since about 2005. Amazingly, the format and overall type of content seems EXACTLY the same as it was then. Really. The site design may have changed a little from 2005, but it is just as clunky.
It is very difficult to determine volume because of the antiquated layout.
About 3500+ photo sets/videos
Several hundred models
1 video and 1 photo set a week (some recycled or previously unpublished old material)
Combination of US and Eastern European models
Most videos are of photo shoots
Mostly solo girl, lesbian and fetish sets
Videos are dated but photo sets are not.
No scoring.
No search functions.
Horrible navigation.
ALS Angels is the other site run by the guy who runs ALSScan, now a part of the Met-Art network. ALS Angels is still independent (NOT part of Met-Art network) and it includes many more full-figured and popular models (Like Lucy Li). It also includes some material that used to be on ALSScan, like the old body-paint and nude-in-public sets. The type of material on this site is identical to the type of material on ALSScan, but the models are not limited to the super-young, relatively thin girls on on ALSScan.
ALS Angels is mostly a lesbian and off-beat fetish site, but there are a few newer boy/girl sex scenes. The girls on this site are more large breasted, curvy, perhaps a little older, but all are shaved and many are quite beautiful. A few headliners like Lucy Li are easily recognizable without much make-up.
Just like ALSScan, practically every model gets fisted at some point. There is also an odd fascination with otherwise un-viewable areas of the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uterus looks like. Many models agree to use an embroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the vagina or rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it neither sexy, nor flattering. In a word, this stuff makes the models clinical.
The girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
Each set, regardless of age, starts out with the girl wearing a skimpy outfit or ALS signature tiny bikini and the girl undresses, lubes up and spreads. it can be quite nice up to here. Then they break out the bottles, vegetables, fists, vacuums, inflators, speculums and embroidery hoops. You might like it, at least at first.
The photographers have a very good rapport with the models and this shows in the sets. They are encouraged to please themselves and are often helped by another girl.
Navigation on this site is among the worst I've ever seen for such a large site. There is no search function. Models are listed alphabetically with an index. Photo-sets are displayed 10 sets across with no dates, names, or other info about the set with over 1000 sets on ONE PAGE! Once you open a photo set, you get between 5-10 pages of images, 6 images across, that are also very difficult to see. The sets are large, but many images are very similar.
You get two size options for display and 2 size options for downloads.
For me, the most frustrating thing about this site is the all-inclusive nature of every single set. I'll compare this to In The Crack, for example, that has many of the same types of scenes. Here, you get one scene or 1 video that includes everything from stripping to fisting to, speculum use to peeing in THE SAME LONG VIDEO or photo set. I don't want that. I want to see these beautiful girls naked, maybe oiled up and spreading, but that's about it. ITC separates out the sets so I can download the scenes I want and pass on the ones I don't. ALS should be doing the same thing. Compartmentalizing the fetishes will make the basic sets much more appealing to non-fetish folks and allow the people who like specific fetishes to just pick them. Win Win!
I also don't like that the photo sets aren't dated. You have no idea if the photo set you are opening is from 2001 or 2017. That's OK if you are a first-time visitor, but not OK if you are looking for material that has been published recently. ALL SETS SHOULD BE DATED. This failure troubles me enough to take away about 10 points from the score.
Bottom line: If you like ALSAngels, you will probably like this site. Keep in mind, though that the models are curvier here, which is a good thing, but the navigation is terrible.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
