Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : skippy (0)

Feedback:   All (584)  |   Reviews (75)  |   Comments (98)  |   Replies (411) Other:   Replies Received (289)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 26-50 of 89 Page : Page 1 2 3 4    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 26 Baeb (0) 68.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Part of Passion-HD network. Young, popular attractive models Good quality videos zipped images from video sets Cons: Very small site Many downloads are broken. (now fixed) Very slow download speeds (compared to other sites in the network). No support. Not already included in Passion-HD platinum Pass. Watermarks on videos and especially images are HUGE and very distracting. Ever watch a silent movie and see all the exaggerated facial expressions? Lots of that, especially in the images. Bottom Line: This site is part of the Passion-HD network, but like a lot of the sites in that network, it is marketed separately and there is no indication from the preview or sign-up screen that it is part of the same network. Once you are a member of any site within the network, Baeb.com is part of the $69 Platinum Pass if you purchase it now, but is not included if you already own the pass, as I do. Pure money grab. Details: 15 videos as of 4/1/17 Good quality but several were broken (fixed) Videos are scored 1-10 stars Videos are dated Model index Photo sets and zip with mid-size images Several of the videos were broken when I first downloaded them, failing about 1/2 to 3/4 of the way through when played. The downloads complete. The vids do not. I think this has been resolved but it is an odd issue. When I tried to contact support about the download issue, the ticket system did not work. It kept asking me to put a name into the name field even though I already had. Giving up on submitting a ticket, I tried again to download the videos a few days later and they now appear to work. The format of these videos is exactly the same as Passion-HD with the exception of a little less POV (no top-down or cowboy POV). This is all straight sex as far as I can tell. No anal or fetish. I think the logic behind this site is that it is supposed to be an actress showcase rather than a niche site. Not sure, though. Bottom line: I can't recommend this site by itself due to the small collection size, broken videos, slow downloads and lack of support. Passion-HD is a much better value. Look for a deal on one of the sites (Including this one, which I saw advertised for $14 someplace) in the network and then consider forking out the $69 to get permanent access to all of the sites (That access is for as long as you maintain the original membership.) The network membership should then include this site. 04-01-17  04:31am Replies (2) Review 27 21 Naturals (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Good quality videos. Nice looking models. More fetish material than expected Some of the bonus material is very good. Sets are dated in both main and bonus sites Everything is HD! Image zips available for all scenes Cons: Lots of effort to get you to sign up to the other two 21 networks. Sex is competent, not necessarily exciting. More fetish material than expected. Filter function is counter-intuitive. Some of the bonus material is better than some of the main material... Bottom Line: It seems that 21Sextury has decided to add shelf-space and increase revenue by breaking up their network into 3 separate networks. That's OK, I guess, but the lines between these networks are a little blurry and arbitrary and the material in some doesn't make sense. Here are a few stats that I could figure out. 21 Naturals: About 780 sets on main site. About 250 female and male actors listed Sets are all dated Videos are all HD up to 1080p. Videos are scored via thumbs up/down. Bonus sites contain another 1000 or so videos. Videos are NOT tagged so you don't know if you are watching an anal or fetish video until you are. You can select anal,for example, in a search filter, but you cannot de-select it. 21 Naturals is billed as the "natural" site with young, fit girls in the no-longer-trending white-room style of video shooting. If it were a site filled with JUST naturals, as billed, I would be pretty happy...but it isn't. It is also the default location for foot fetish and anal videos. In fact, those types of videos seem to outnumber the videos that I signed up for. If you are into anal there is some decent stuff here. Unfortunately, I'm not. Same with foot fetish stuff. I'm not into that either. Oh well, I guess I should have read on the preview page......oh wait, they don't say ANYTHING about fetishes within 21 naturals on the preview page. They say you have access to over 15 sites and over 100 new videos a month and don't elaborate any further. They show 2 OTHER sites called 21foot-art and 21erotic-anal, but they look like different sites in the preview, not integral parts of 21naturals. Similarly, the images on the 21naturals preview page are young solo models or straight sex images that fit with "natural". No fetishes shown or implied at all. More than a little misleading, especially if you think, like I did, that one of those other sites might be 21sextury. Nope. They are all micro-sites with a specific theme like Asian, big boobs, booty, more anal, DP or whatever. Now, in all honesty, these are awesome bonus sites compared to those offered in some other networks, so I can't knock them. But even the bonus sites don't really lend themselves to categories in some cases. The Bitch Club for example, includes many different types of scenes including, yep, some foot fetish and anal. The videos are well done, well lit, well directed and the models are usually quite beautiful even in the bonus sites. The bonus sites, by the way, have the same look and feel, both in navigation and in content, as the main site, so I suspect that these bonus sites may be available in the other two networks. Don't know for sure. Every scene is scripted and acted out. The interaction between the couple is often somewhat limited and you often don't see much chemistry between them. It isn't that the chemistry isn't there, I guess, but you don't see it. Scenes are often slow and the couples often don't even look at each other during sex, with very little kissing or affection. Kind of weird for this style of video, which can be both more affectionate and more kinetic on some other sites. They do have an interesting "filter" system that allows you to select options like anal so the resulting videos include it. But the "filter" is backwards. FILTER means exclude, not include. So if I de-select anal, I should not get anal. Instead, when I deselect anal, all I get is anal! Deselect foot fetish and anal? you get both. In the meantime, if all I want to see is latinas having straight sex, nope. I can choose latinas, but it includes all latina scenes including fetishes. I apologize for ranting about this, but it is clear that the webmasters don't understand that, although they've put great effort into search functions, these functions are counter-intuitive. Overall, I would compare this site to Wowgirls X-Art or Joymii. The material is very similar, with interaction perhaps a little less intimate than those sites. But these webmasters really missed the mark on determining where to separate their three networks and how to market them. Half of the material here belongs in a new network called 21fetish. Is it worth visiting? Well, yes, it is,especially for the relatively low price. If you like anal or foot-jobs, there is some good stuff here. There is also some good straight sex stuff here, all in HD. But I am going to penalize the site a couple of points because of the totally whacked way they threw the fetishes into this otherwise young-girl straight-sex site, how the filters don't work and how the landing page shows you locked sets from the other networks in an effort to bait you into signing up over there. I hope you found this useful! If so, a trust vote would be appreciated! 02-26-17  05:16pm Replies (9) Review 28 ALS Scan (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Huge quantity of material. Many popular models here. The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are very good and in HD. Newer photo sets come in high resolution. Mostly solo/lesbian site but some newer B/G scenes. The girls appear to be having genuine fun. Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2004. Sets are scored One update per day. Navigation is good. Search function is good. Cons: About 1 in 10-14 releases are actually re-posts or remastered sets of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not cool if you are returning. The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while. The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here. Bottom Line: I last reviewed this site back in 2012. Some things have changed since then. Most, not so much. ALSSCAN Stats: (As of 2-15-2017) About 4900 photo sets/videos Several thousand models 1 set a day (many recycled) Combination of US and Eastern European models Most videos are of photo shoots Solo girl, lesbian and fetish sets ALSScan is primarily a lesbian and off-beat fetish site. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. Many of the girls from older sets and some from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Kimmy Granger, Gina Gerson, Dakota Skye, Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up. ALSScan "screens" a lot of models, evidenced by the proliferation of casting shoots throughout the sets, but only a small percentage of these girls are above average looking. The really great looking ones have sets that are re-posted, which is serious cheating. There is a lot of new content, but the way the site re-uses content, you can't really tell if it is new or not. Considering there is no recycled content anywhere else within the Met-Art network, this sin takes about 10 points off of my score for the site. This would be a much better site if they stopped recycling content. But the success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide, even if some of it is recycled. Until recently, there were NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though. Just since 2016, a very small number of B/G scenes have appeared. In typical ALS style, though, many of these scenes are unusual in that the guy inserts something into the girl, like a bottle, her fist, his fist, a vegetable or dildo, before he inserts himself into her. There are only a couple of B/G scenes so far. Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paradise. There is an odd fascination with otherwise unviewable areas of the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uterus looks like. Many models agree to use an embroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the vagina or rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it neither sexy, nor flattering. In a word, this stuff makes the models clinical. Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that moment is. Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that a lot here! The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was cool. That was about 200 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the lollipop is. This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt. To be fair, each set, new or old, starts out with the girl wearing a skimpy outfit or ALS signature tiny bikini and the girl undresses, lubes up and spreads. it can be quite nice up to here. Then they break out the bottles, vegetables, fists, vacuums, inflators, speculums and embroidery hoops. You might like it, at least at first. In one video, Gina Gerson uses an inflator dildo and the photographer keeps saying "Are you OK?" That about sums up my thoughts when I see the stuff they insert into the girls. Alsscan has a sister site called allsangels that is not within the Met Art network. The "Director" has no qualms with showing you a set of girls in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership there. Models at THAT site include Lucy Li, Dillon Harper, August Ames.....all it does for me is piss me of that these good looking, curvier girls are there instead of here. The photographers here have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having a lot of fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camera.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment, which they do. There is a section where some of the girls go to a tropical island. Once there, they run around naked and have sex with any girl they want. Unfortunately, the last time anybody went to one of these tropical islands was in 2009...doesn't stop them from re-posting them as new daily sets though. Bottom line: I've been to this site about 10 times since 2001. For the last few times, the material has been so similar and so many sets have been recycled that I can no longer tell what is new and what is not. It is a great site to visit once. Just once. I keep forgetting 02-15-17  11:08pm Replies (7) Review 29 Wankz VR (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Nice collection of excellent quality VR videos Attractive, popular US and European models Includes a large non-VR network Includes several female POV VR videos 90% of these videos are particpatory. Many 2-girl participatory videos. File sizes are listed VR videos are dated VR videos are scored thumbs-up/down with a percentage. Good file naming for VR videos. Good download speeds Cons: Not many negatives... Navigation is basic No photos except representative thumbnail for each video. Most videos are shot in one position, prone, but there are some notable exceptions. Most non-VR material in network is not dated. Non-VR sites not quite as well done as VR site. Bottom Line: This review and score is ONLY for the VR site, compared to other VR sites, but I will mention the other network sites as appropriate. This was one of the first sites I joined when I got my HTC Vive, but somehow in the rush to try things I failed to write a review. I just re-joined the site on a $79 annual membership, which is a pretty good deal considering they publish VR 3 times a week. WankzVR is a top-notch VR site probably among the top 2 or 3 on the Internet. The additional network is not quite as sophisticated as Wankz VR, but there is some good stuff there as well. Stats for WankzVR: (as of 2/15/2017) About 108 VR Videos About 65 models Updates every 3 or 4 days Formats include Gear (H/L), phone (H,M,L), Oculus(H/L), Vive (H/L) 60 FPS typical Highest resolution is 3840x1920 Typical video is about 45-70 minutes!! Typical HD file size is very large, about 5-10 gigs. Some are as large as 16 gigs. All videos are 180 degrees. 3D Video format is Left/Right About 95% of these videos are participatory (i.e. you fuck her...) Nearly all of these videos start with the male prone and he stays in that position through out the video with the girl(s) doing all the work. One unique, often pleasant thing to this site is that the girls often get very close to the camera and spread. Other sites spread, but usually not 10 inches from your nose. A few other sites offer "face sitting" but those scenes are considered fetish do not end in sex. Here, the close-up is practically part of the typical strip, show, blow and screw sequence. The gawker in you will love it. The girls are often quite beautiful and fit, but a few are just a bit more full figured, nicely curvy. There are pretty much no "mature" models here, which sets the range to the 18-25 up-and-coming porn stars. Make-up is usually well done in an American or Met-Art near-glam but not overdone style. These videos are acted out a little more than most and always have a story-line of sorts...as much as you can in porn. Leah Gotti has a terrific scene in an acted-out casting-couch-like story. She comes in thinking she is interviewing for a non-porn scene, ends up stripping and getting her lights fucked out (very active scene) and leaves insulted as the guy says he'll call her. In another scene called "Dear Diary, Jackpot!" , two cheerleaders (Naomi Woods and Bella Rose) end up in a competition for Bella's boyfriend. The scene is really top-notch. Bella's jealous glances add a nice touch. These two scenes are probably among my top-10. Come to think of it, there are a LOT of two girl scenes where you get laid by both girls. This is much more satisfying than just watching two girls do each other. The videos are well done and the sets are good quality but not overly luxurious or distracting. The girls ALWAYS seem like they are enjoying the scenes, which you can see through the acting. I can even say that some of the acting is good. The fact that these guys put together pretty good skits is a good indication that they are all having fun and aren't afraid to try new things. It reminds me a little of Twisty's in that regard. The rest of the network is also good, but not quite as well done overall as WankzVR. The VR site feels different and is more up to date. The other sites don't all include dates and file sizes. I might do a regular Wankz review a little later. Bottom line: For VR, WankzVR is a top-notch, best-of-class site well worth the $20 for a month or even $79 for a year! Go check it out! 02-15-17  07:23am Replies (0) Review 30 Gamelink VR (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Good selection of videos. Many different sources. Amateur and pro material. Preview images provided Cons: Site is a pay-per-download marketing venue for other VR sites. NO original material VERY SLOW download speeds Frequent download failures Bottom Line: This is one of a growing number of pay-per-download sites. Downloads average about $10 each and come from various other sites that are seeking additional ways to get their videos seen and/or are looking for extra revenue. In this new age of unlimited downloads, I don't really approve of this type of site, but there are a few that provide independent material on behalf of their clients. This site is NOT one of those sites. This site resells videos that are otherwise available from other websites. They make a few bucks for distribution, the author-site makes a few bucks in roylaties and they also get their name out there. Unfortunately, what these author-sites don't realize is that it is far too easy to provide a negative impression when a pay-per-download site does a poor job like this one does. My impression of Badoink, for example, is somewhat worse than it was when I wrote a review on them last month. Bottom line? Considering that 3 downloads here equals a one month subscription to most sites, check to see the SOURCE of the video you are purchasing and go there to see if simply subscribing to the site would be a better option. If the content-source site looks like a better deal, sign up! If not, go ahead and download it here but be prepared to wait longer than you should for it to download. I hope that was helpful! 02-09-17  09:29pm Replies (0) Review 31 Fetish Network (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Young attractive models. Newer sites seem to have found a niche. Newer video quality is good. Site layout is pretty good. Navigation is pretty good. Videos are user scored on a 5 point scale. Updates are dated. Download speeds are OK. Current sites are 1080p. A few videos are 4k. Cons: Many older sites no longer update. The newer sites are not BDSM sites, they are "Simulated Peril" sites. (Can we coin that phrase, maybe?) Only 1 update a week across all sites. HUGE video blocking watermarks on every video Infuriating page load delays until you scroll down to view the next sections. Images but NO ZIP FILES! File resolutions and sizes not listed. Video file naming could be better. Repetitive nature of themes is unfortunate. Very limited set and male actor variety. OH. Cancellation process is worst on Internet! Cancel fine print says you have to cancel at least 30 DAYS prior to next billing. That's nuts! Bottom Line: I'll start by saying that my review is primarily about the dedicated, updating micro-sites in this "network". When it comes to BDSM material, I think the gold standard is probably the Kink network. That network provides a lot of really raw, tie-the-girl-down-and-make-her-come-a-million-times true BDSM that is consensual but incredibly intense. Some of it is a bit too brutal for me, though, although it is clearly all consensual. In the middle, I don't know, several sites where a model/actress is tied down and you can't quite tell if she is acting or not when the guy puts a vibrator to her clit. BBB comes to mind, but there is a moderate amount of acting there. Then there are these "simulated peril" sites. The girl is tied up loosely or only has her hands tied together during sex, with a backstory that implies peril. Sites in this category include the main micro-sites here and those on the sister site punishteens.com. These sites may have popular models and porn stars, but the scenes are nowhere near as intense as scenes found on true BDSM sites. (The best of this simulated type that I ever saw was on the Hustler site. Guy breaks in and attacks the girl, girl gets a gun, girl makes guy seriously fuck her, then at the end the girl points the gun at him and after fade-to-black, shoots him. Awesome Karma!) Sorry, I digress, but it was best-of-genre and memorable. All that said, there are 7 micro-sites here that I consider current and not a purchased collection. They are: (scenes in p Teen Creeper (8 ) Teens in the Woods (12) Helpless Teens (42) Brutal Casings (56) Brutal Pickups (12. last update: 5/16) Sexual Disgrace (130. last update 8/16) Strap-on Squad (60. last update 9/16) Sexual Disgrace is a pretty good traditional dungeon-style BDSM site with a lot of content. Strap-on Squad is an all girl dungeon-style site. Both of these seem to be no longer be updating. Note that there is 1, one, one, ONE primary male actor on all of the sites listed above, except Teen Creeper, and he is also often found on punishteens as well. He is a very, very busy guy. There are also 11 "collection" sites that do not update, many of which are so old (i.e. 2011) as to be all medium to standard def. There are a total of about 1,130 videos in these collections. There is some true BDSM here and some good images. Just in case you can't guess, here are the themes: Teen Creeper: Break-in and forced sex. 1 or 2 girls. A few of these scenes are pretty good but all are nearly identical in format. This site uses a different male actor who is a good creeper. Teens in the Woods: Girl(s) in the woods find their way to a house where a forest ranger serial rapist lives. Helpless Teens: Stranded girls who need a ride do stuff in the front and the back of a van for that ride. Many get dragged back to a dungeon-like bed for additional sex. Brutal Castings: Exactly as it sounds. Starts out nice, then the guy goes ape-shit on the girl, ties her hands and screws her. Brutal pick-ups: Girl on a street gets pulled into an alley, hands tied and screwed. They all sound pretty good, don't they? Well, although the first one of each of these that you watch will be entertaining (Ava Taylor in Brutal Castings, for example, or Gina Valentina in the first few minutes of Teen Creeper), they are all so similar that they quickly get boring. Add that the girls are usually not really tied up and are clearly just doing their usual porn acting stuff, complete with the usual porn sequences from blow job to money shot, and the whole thing goes pretty limp. Honestly, the best part of each scene is the moment when the guy "grabs" the girl and you can't quite tell if the initial reaction from the girl is acting or not. (That sounds really creepy, but, hey, that's why I joined!) The limited themes and settings, the repetition and the occasional re-use of an actress on different micro-sites, detracts from the overall entertainment value. Overall, the sets are well done and well lit. The guy does a pretty good job of acting and the girls' acting varies. Video quality on these is good,although the actual video size is not consistent across all the sets. You don't know if "HD Hi" is 2K or 4K until you start the download and file sizes are not listed. The newer sites have a frustrating "feature". When viewing the 4-8 sets on a page, the section of the page that is not visible does not load until you scroll down. So you spend a truly stupid amount of time waiting for the page to load as you scroll. This is unnervingly slow during peak internet hours. 4 to 8 sets per page? Why should I have to wait? Oh, and there is no easy way to cancel. Uh oh. Ran out of space. I would recommend this site to those who really like the simulated BDSM style, or for anyone looking for a bargain in older true BDSM. I downloaded what I wanted and will probably not be back 02-09-17  06:26pm Replies (0) Review 32 Twistys Network (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Good quality images and videos Popular,attractive US nude and porn models Huge selection Nobody is the least bit shy here. Cons: Bait and switch up-sales Downloads cost more (videos AND image zip files) Access to old material costs more Streaming videos, although they say HD, are not. You are not TOLD any of this when you sign up. Cash-grab cross-checks (i.e. upgrade for an additional $39 at sign up. Upgrade is only $10 after you sign up.) Up-sale landing page at login Up-sales at every click. Did I mention bait and switch up-sales? upsales upsales Annoying? Yes, it is. Main biller is MBI-Probiller. Only way to cancel is to contact them. Bottom Line: I have been a member of Twistys almost every year since about 2002. For some reason, TBP/PU decided to start a new listing when they changed the name from Twistys to "Twistys Network". I have a prior review from 2015 listed under just "Twistys" that is still fairly accurate but it isn't here because...no idea. Twistys, Twistys Network and Twistys Hard are all the same site. It isn't a network at all. It has been this way for over a decade. No one site has material that isn't on at least one of the other sites. This time, when I signed up using the Porn Users discount, I learned AFTER I joined that downloads of any sort cost extra. The "VIP" option was $39 a month at sign up. Once I was in the site, it was only $10 a month. And every time I login or click a page, I get a "One time offer" for access to everything Twisty's has to offer for "only" $59. Wow, what a bargain... If this were Met Art or Kink or any of the dozens of other true networks, I might jump on that. But it isn't. What they are giving you is the ability to download material that you should already be able to download, and access to mostly lower resolution archives that you should already have access to. It is a money grab and it sucks. When I contacted support, they said there had been piracy so they changed the pricing. Nice try since Chrome plug-ins allow one to download all the videos on the site that can't be downloaded without paying extra. So by not allowing downloads they are actually creating piracy. Smart. OK, enough bitching. Clearly I am pissed off at being treated like shit by the owners of this site. Let me tell you why I wanted to rejoin Twisty's in the first place. Twistys is one of the last of the old 90's style creative glam sites. The photographers (or photography studios) are world famous folks that shot for Playboy and Penthouse. Names like Holly Randall, J. Stephen Hicks (Digital Desire Studio) and others. They know how to shoot images and videos so the material is generally top notch. The lesser known photographers here follow the teachings of these great, great photographers. So you get perfect sets, perfect lighting, perfect make-up, absolutely no distractions from the reason you are here and a come-hither effect that you only see on a few sites these days. The other thing you find here is an old-school creative vibe that is reminiscent of Danny's Hard Drive from the 90's. Many sets have themes like politics, some kind of fantasy scenario or just general whimsy. Sometimes this works. Sometimes it doesn't. but you have to give them credit for being good enough to try things. And lastly, the models/porn stars are nearly all popular, English speaking and typically very attractive. They strip, they play, they fuck, they masturbate. They do everything you want in a straight-style porn website. Many of them talk to you while they are doing it and the best of them look at the camera in a way that makes you think they are looking right at you. When it is good, it is very, very good. Those things are what has kept this site alive for the last 15+ years. Now, there are a few nitpicks. Many of the porn stars here are on the more mature side. Although some are new and on an upward trajectory, many are beyond peak and a few are really well beyond peak. Physical enhancements are plentiful. It seems that as porn stars mature, they decide or are coerced into doing things that ultimately damage their natural beauty. A few girls, like August Ames with her lip work, (Sorry, August) are sometimes uncomfortable to look at. Porn stars age. Some gracefully, some not so much. Both types are here. Subscriber scores sometimes don't seem to matter. I first noticed this several years ago. The site has something called "Twistys Treats", which is a long, long standing monthly profile that includes an interview and several photo and video shoots. They used to pick the treat based on the highest number of subscriber votes. The highest voted model became the Treat. Then there were a few months where the highest vote DIDN'T become the Treat, then they stopped the voting. I think this may be a porn studio thing and not a subscriber thing. My guess is that Twistys is as much a venue for the studios as it is a site for subscribers and studios are paying to profile their stars. I can't be sure about this, but it FEELS like it. If you don't know the history, it isn't a huge deal, but I do, so it is to me. So I don't trust any scores now. So...bottom line. Is Twisty's worth a visit? Well, if you haven't been here before and you like high quality glam-style porn, absolutely. It is still a very good site with a huge volume of excellent material. But if you are a returning subscriber, be prepared to be annoyed by the up sale and bait and switch tactics that they use here now. In other words, be prepared to be treated like shit instead of the valuable customer that you are. 02-05-17  10:35am Replies (0) Review 33 Czech VR (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: About 120 VR videos on CzechVR alone. Site is part of a larger network. A few Czech models you might recognize. Fetish videos on sister site are interesting. Decent navigation Mostly young models Site does a few things that are unique OK quality videos Cons: Models are young but several are not necessarily fit or conventionally pretty Lots of distractions Models are not always enjoying themselves Bottom Line: I have been scoring these sites based on their VR-only content for the most part. I have also been comparing these VR sites to each other, not to non-VR sites, so my scoring is a little different. The assumption is that you are here looking for VR material. Quick stats: VR videos: CzechVR: 120 CzechVR Fetish: 42 CzechVR Casting: 55 65%+ observational. Unknown number of models (model page includes non-VR sets) There is a VR update every 2-3 days. Entirely Eastern European models that are mostly not well known elsewhere. Downloads available for Smartphone, Gear and Oculus Rift Most files are 60 FPS. Resolutions and file sizes are good and listed. Run times are listed and vary from 10-20 minutes. Publish dates are listed. Download times are OK multiple downloads are OK Videos are user scored thumbs up or down (highest score: 100% lowest score: 33%) CzechVR is part of a larger group called Mentalpass. It includes two other VR sites CzechVR Casting and CzechVR Fetish and 6 non VR sites . In total there are about 200+ VR Videos here. That is a very large number for a VR site/network. One interesting thing they do here is what I'll call the missionary mimic. Basically, the girl lays down and the VR camera moves forward very close over her. She makes appropriate sounds and moves as though the viewer is mounting her. Then she gyrates up and down as though being fucked. The technique is sometimes used in those solo simulated sex sites and it is an interesting experience in a VR setting. The only issue is that the camera moves, which can be unsettling in VR. When done well I'm sure it can be very satisfying. The other thing that they have here are VR fetish videos. This includes virtual face sitting, fisting, nylons, latex, peeing/pee-play and girls getting golden showers from the male participant. If you are into those things and you have VR equipment, this is a pretty good place to get it. I grabbed a couple of the face-sitting videos and was highly entertained. The rest are not my taste. That said, as much as I would like to say this is a great site, it falls short in a couple of key areas. First, the girls are all young and some are quite beautiful, but several are not conventionally attractive. Some are a little large and/or flat-chested for porn roles and some have a (politely) average look. Combine this with oddly done make-up, poor dental work and occasional hygiene issues and this makes a few of the videos difficult to watch. I was asking things like "Where did this girl get her neon eye shadow?..." Some girls also "pull faces" which didn't help. Now, to be fair, I'm a white American. What the fuck do I know about the tastes of people in other countries? Nothing. This site also illustrates how prevalent tattoos are in eastern Europe. There are also some unusual piercings in places that I have not seen before. Again, these are all things that distract from the scenes. I should be enjoying the scene, not wondering what something tattooed on a girl says. Only about a third of the videos are participatory. The rest are observing sex, have the girl masturbating or are lesbian scenes with no male participant. Somebody here doesn't get VR. I do not want to be watching, I want to be DOING! The sets vary a lot in location, lighting and quality. There were a few scenes where the VR perspective (i.e. the camera) moved unexpectedly. In VR, this can be VERY disorienting. Many scenes have unexpected noises that make you want to pull off your VR gear to see what's happening in your room or who is at the door. Table and bed thuds, sirens outside, things dropping and noises that simply shouldn't be there. This was VERY distracting. Several sets also had distracting things within view. I found myself looking around far more often than I should have been. To be fair, the majority of the models are pretty good looking and they seemed like they were enjoying themselves. But a few almost seemed to be in pain... When a girl looks to be in pain and never takes the guy all the way in, the scene can be unpleasant to watch. Culture, maybe... Several of the girls spoke English, but a few spoke native (Czech?). I was guessing which line was "Do you want me to take my bra off?" and which was "I want you to fuck me!" Sometimes it was pleasant. Sometimes not. Bottom line? Well....The fetish stuff is interesting and there are some pretty good videos here, but given the huge volume of VR videos here, the overall score is a little disappointing. You will have to sift through a lot to find the good ones. Those websites that list CzechVR among the top 10 porn VR sites clearly haven't looked lately. The site has some videos out on Pornhub if you want to sample them. After seeing some of the best VR the internet has to offer elsewhere, I have a hard time recommending this site for the general porn viewer. You decide 02-03-17  12:11am Replies (3) Review 34 TMW VR Net (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Part of the TMW network so you get a lot of other material Good looking, mostly young European models Many familiar popular models here. Consistently good quality VR videos Decent number of VR videos All videos can be previewed/streamed in 2-D (that feature is unique to this site). Still images available in zip files. File names are numbered, named and include resolution. Release dates are included. Up-next videos are listed. Models and videos are user-scored. Cons: Navigation within this site is kind of basic Searches, etc, bring up all site material. making it difficult to sort out VR material. Model names are not included on the updates or results pages. There are a few more tattoos here than I've seen at other sites. Bottom Line: Although this is a micro-site within the Teen Mega World network, my goal here is to review JUST THE VR material for those who are looking specifically for that. As a result, my impression and rating may be a little different since I am comparing only VR sites. TMWVR is among the top five or so VR sites today. The videos are generally very good quality and the selection is larger than average. TMWVR Statistics: 61 videos About 25 models Models are European Nearly all girls release both an observation and a participation video. Worth noting: Only a few anal scenes here. (I'm not an anal fan, so I appreciate that. You may not.) One new set every 4 days or so. Videos come in Rift/Vive, Gear and mobile formats. Videos also come in PC (flat) format in 1080p and 2-D mobile format. (This is the only site I've seen that consistently provides this.) Sets and models are rated on a 10 point scale. File sizes, resolutions and frame rates are listed Thumbnail images of each set with an available zip file. Typical videos are 25 minutes long. Oculus/Vive files are about 6 GB. If this were a freestanding VR site, it would easily be in the top 5. The fact that it comes with an entire network of other good quality material puts it up there in the top 3. Video quality is very good to excellent. The sets are reasonably well done, although many of the shoots look like they take place in somebody's apartment. There are no significant distractions on set. The models young, attractive, are well directed and they look like they are enjoying themselves for the most part. (A few girls I've never seen before look almost mad...probably just a Russian cultural thing.) A few of the videos are kind of silly (i.e. Nicole Love wearing a Pokeman robe/hoodie/costume thing), but they still are not that hard to watch. (Nicole is in another set that more than makes up for it.) There are a couple of videos here that are really, really excellent. Paula Shy, for example, provides a very impressive performance in a VR video called "Bangin' Bookworm" that will leave you totally satisfied. I would easily put that one on my top ten list of the 450 or so VR videos that I have collected so far. There are one or two other top-ten and/or top-twenty VR vids here, too. One thing I noticed here that I don't see everywhere else was some pretty high-energy screwing going on. The sex often starts slow and then gets crazy intense. (No shortage of seriously flailing boobs or totally slapping crotches here...) In some scenes it seems like, I don't know, these couples were actually trying to get each other off. That is nice to see and, you know, be a part of. Every model provides both a passive VR video where she gets off in front of you and a more active one where you screw her (or more accurately, she rides you.) These come in sort of a set with the observation video first and teh participation video a few releases later. Most videos have you lay prone and you remain that way with no switch to an upright, active position. A few models have more than one complete set. There are more tattoos here than I've seen on the other high quality VR sites including at least one huge back-covering tattoo. One of the surrogate guys has a large chest tattoo also. These are all OK, but they distract a little from the action. "What is that thing supposed to be on her back" or "Hey! Look! I have a tattoo!" are not things I want to be thinking about when a VR girl is bouncing on my dick, but here it happens. Oh well. Although I said I would not bring up the other TMW sites, there are a couple of pros and cons. On the pro side, all of the VR videos come in an HD non-VR 2-D version also. If you are into full POV but don't have VR gear, you just hit the jackpot because by their nature, these are awesome POV videos. On the con side, you will often get tossed into the general pool when searching or browsing and the only way to tell if the video is VR is by looking at the watermark. Similarly, once a model is identified on a video detail page, her other videos also show up at the bottom of the page, but most will probably not be VR videos. This is a great thing if you really like the model and want to see more of her. Not so great if you are just looking for VR stuff. Just for comparison, the TMWVR VR videos are generally better than the TMW non-VR videos. This may be because they are newer, because they are better directed, or because the skill set of the crew is better. I'm not sure. They are just better. Given the requirements, they probably should be. Bottom line? $20 for a site that includes 60+ VR videos PLUS thousands of non-VR items is a no-brainer! And as I said, the quality here is generally very good. Go for it! I recommend it! 02-02-17  06:08pm Replies (0) Review 35 Goddess Nudes (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Large collection (about 1900 sets) Huge variety of young models Many are very atractive Many familiar models Photography is generally very good Recent images available up to 4K+ Website redesign provides excellent navigation Models are user scored and user tagged Cons: Photography and models are sometimes not quite as spectacular as some of the other Met-Art collection sites. No significant discount for current members of other sites in the Met-Art network. Re-sampling of older images kind of a mixed bag in terms of quality. Bottom Line: I did a review several years ago and decided to refresh it since Goddess Nudes is now a full blown member of the Met-Art network. A few things haven't changed but many have. This site has about 8 years photo sets at about 5 updates a week. The models are generally Eastern European and a few have been on Met-Art, but the vast majority of models here are NOT ones that you see on other network sites. Some are quite attractive. Interestingly, I was unable to find a few models that were here before, like Mila I from Met-Art....not sure why. One thing that I noticed immediately was that when I went to the models tab and sorted by "top rated", only a half-dozen or so out of the top 40 were girls I easily recognized from Met-Art. The top girls here are more earthy. THEN, starting about 40 girls in, you see Emily Bloom and several others that are also on Met Art. There is some integration, culling and renaming going on, too, because a few girls are listed more than once with different names, with different sets in each name. The brand new site overhaul is a HUGE improvement, making the site look and feel much more like the others in the Met-Art community. It brings every feature that Met-Art has to offer including the user definable options like default image size and my favoriate, the "open images in new window" option. All sets are dated and scored and user tags are available. File names have changed throughout the site to a format that closely matches the Met-Art format. (site, date, model, photographer.) This is great going forward. I may end up with duplicates, but I'll deal with it. In general, many of the sets are not as polished and the models are not as well made-up as they are on other sites in the Met-Art network, especially the older sets. One significant difference that I think I notice is that there is little or no airbrushing here. I would define many of these sets as "Naked girl in the woods" sets. There are a lot of indoor sets also. None of them are awful. No dorm rooms, laundromats or cheesy offices but no bazillion dollar LA homes either. Recent sets, starting in about 2014 are much better quality. That probably coincides with the Met-Art merge. That also coincides with when several of the more popular models started showing up, like Emily Bloom....but have I seen these Emily Bloom sets elsewhere?....possibly. Also starting in around 2013-2014, I noticed a practice that I truly hate. Melena A is named Mariska on this site. She has a total of two sets here that are one set broken up into 2 releases! 84 images in February of 2014 and another 38 or so in March. This is the only case like this that I see, but it is a practice that I truly despise. It looks like the older sets have been re-sampled to accommodate the default image size ranges provided for download. Even the oldest images are available in 2400x3700, but the re-sampling has an adverse impact on the quality of those images. Interaction with the photographer is generally very good, depending on the experience of the model, and many look like they are having a pretty good time. Kudos to the photo crew for that. In terms of clothing, the models either start out with one or two pieces of clothing and immediately get naked, or they are naked throughout the set. Sets that are more than a few years old are pretty conservative in terms of overall view and close-ups, but the sets have changed a little since Met-Art got involved, so many of the later sets are a little more Met-Art-like in terms of what you see. Still, this is a solo-girl softcore site. If you are looking for spreading, insertions, masturbation, B/G, etc., you won't find it here. Bottom line? Met-Art is doing a lot to improve this site, but in general it remains kind of a b-side site with a lot of sets that, for whatever reason, either didn't quite make it to the main event or, possibly, where once on other sites in the network. In any case, with 8 years worth of content, there is a lot to look at, but unlike Met-Art, there is not enough here to make me want to stay long-term or even return more then once every couple of years. If you have never been here or have not been here since Met-Art started running things, go ahead and join for the $20 price that is available. If you've been here within the last year or two, you might want to pick a different Met-Art site to visit. 01-19-17  09:28pm Replies (0) Review 36 Eternal Desire (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Many of the best models from Met Art Outstanding photography Perfect settings and lighting Sets are usually more revealing than Met Art Good site layout and navigation Videos are often not boring! Models and sets are user-scored Searchable tags Cons: Not a huge site, but larger than many One update every 2-4 days (usually 2) No tiered pricing for existing Met-Art network members No other cons! Bottom Line: This site is a satellite in the Met Art universe that is exclusively presented by one of Met Art's best photographers, Arkisi. I can't find any profile information on Arkisi, but he/she is a very, very busy and talented person. The site includes many of the best models from Met Art in really excellent sets. Many of the videos are also excellent, which is often not the case elsewhere in the Met-Art world. Overall, I'd say that this is 2nd or 3rd behind Met-Art in terms of best within the network. Some basic stats: About 720 sets (15 a month since 2014) About 172 models Sets range from about 35 to 120 images Videos are about 6 to 22 minutes Images come in three sizes 1k, 2k and 4k+ Videos come in several formats from 270p (why?) to full HD in MP4, WMV and Divx. All sets are user scored and user tag searchable. All sets are dated The basic shell is very similar to Met-Art, including a user-options page that allows you to tailor your experience....except the option to open each image in a new page is not present. The models here are every bit as amazing as they are over in Met-Art, but many models here are a little more...open. There are a few sets insertions and some other things like candle-play. Several videos start out showcase and end up masturbation. I actually joined this site because I wanted to see....um...a little more of a particular, exclusive model and, wow, I was not disappointed. Keep in mind, though, that this is strictly solo and some two-girl scenes. It is up a notch or two from Met-Art, but it is not at all hardcore. In addition to the popular models, there are a few casting sets and a few sets with models I've never seen before. These might be girls that are popular elsewhere or girls that didn't stick around for one reason or another, I'm not sure. I'm scoring this one an 90. The site is excellent overall, but isn't quite as large as most A sites. So it got that score based on the quality of material. Bottom line. If you like Met-Art, do not hesitate to join this site. It is well worth the $20. 01-19-17  07:37pm Replies (0) Review 37 Real Jam VR (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Good quality VR videos Young Attractive European models Several resolutions available. Navigation is straightforward Images provided are representative of vids. Cons: Site is small (34 vids) Navigation is extremely basic Video download selection process is a little cumbersome. 50%+ of vids are observation only. No release dates or schedule No scoring several formats, but they are not very consistent Bottom Line: OK, real quick.... RealJam is another start-up VR video provider based out of Budapest using Eastern European models. They are still pretty small, but so far they are doing things pretty well in terms of production. RealJam Stats: About 34 videos About 18 models Formats include Gear, Oculus/Vive, smartphone. Largest format for Vive/Oculus is about 3200x1800 but not all vids are that high. Videos average about 10 minutes. Largest format file sizes are about 2-2.5 gigs (That is shorter and smaller than most) Download speeds are good. Overview: When you log in, you get get a listing of videos with representative images and download options right on the listing page. There are 4 videos per page and there are currently 9 pages, so that's about 36 videos. Each model actually produces 2 or 3 videos. At least one is an observational strip show/masturbation video and the others are participatory. They don't always fall in sequence. Sets are nicely done, high end with no real distractions...large homes or hotel suites. Lighting is generally good. There is almost always a kind of funky logo prop someplace visible in the room that Say's Real Jam with the sylized Ass made out of the L in Real and the J and Jam. Kind of clever.....kind of. That logo tells me these are all made by the crew and not brought in by an independent and purchased. I find selecting a download format to be kind of clunky and have accidentally downloaded the wrong format more than once. For each video, there are 4 tabs across the top for the format (Gear, Oculus, Vive and Smartphone). Within each tab are the resolutions available for that format. Oculus and Vive are always the same and could easily be combined. What trips me up is that I think I hit the Vive tab and then hit the high-resolution format to download, then move on to look at the next set. It isn't until the file is downloaded that I realize I forgot to hit the Vive tab before downloading. The tab option is a reasonable approach, but there should be some way to see all or choose a default. Before I realized what I was doing wrong, I opened a Gear video thinking it was the best they had and was very disappointed. Let's see....The models act pretty well and are directed well. There is a surprising amount of English dialog (monologue, really) with heavy eastern European accents. It doesn't detract from the videos any, though,...probably adds a little, especially since the dialog is generally pretty polite. You know, "You like?" and "You want to see?" kind of stuff. The video releases are not dated, which I find a little frustrating. And as I mentioned, the resolution varies sometimes between videos. Bottom line: For $20, go ahead and jump right in! It is well worth it for the collection of quality videos that they have. 01-17-17  03:07pm Replies (0) Review 38 Triple BBB (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: High quality light, often playful bondage videos Wide variety of related fetishes as well Photo sets included with most video sets Popular European models and porn stars Roughly 176 "sets" Been around since 2005 Sets are dated. Cons: Very slow release schedule. 1 2-minute portion of a video set or a portion of a photo set every couple of days (6-8 minutes a week?) Photo sets are broken up into multiple 20-30 image releases. One image size per set (varies) One video format (currently 1080p) This is a "one-man operation" so the site lacks many typical features. Very, very simple navigation No search function No scoring or ranking Without a doubt the slowest downloads I have ever seen. Bottom Line: I'm not sure exactly what to make of this site. I really like some aspects of it, but it is a one-man operation for the most-part, so many elements are completely exasperating. The images and videos are actually very good for this genre. The girls allow themselves to be tied up or appear to be unconscious at the beginning of each video. Once tied they then struggle a little (and I mean a tiny amount since their restraints are often loose) and then they are mechanically masturbated or dildoed by somebody else or they do it themselves with barely free hands. The models are pretty consistently clothed in stockings and heels or long boots, with lace body suits or something similar, sometimes crotchless, usually with panties. Many sets have models wearing latex dresses, skirts or body suits. I don't think the girls are completely nude in any set. The doms in these videos are either an unseen man or often another female model or porn star. Ashley Bulgari seems to be a little bit of a fixture in recent sets as either dom or sub. Lorena Garcia, the reason I joined the site, is the current model with about 10 sets. Girls include Eufrat, Monica Scott and many others. The videos are high quality and reasonably well "acted". The girls are usually clearly enjoying things and there is no brutality or hard-forced orgasms. I see a consensual light neck-grab or two and a little light spanking, often with a flat-palm-touch warning to the model. There is no B/G sex at all, but a few of the lesbian scenes are pretty interesting. The videos and shoots are fairly modest with no close-ups, spreading, or things that I perceive the crew thinks would be interpreted as disrespectful to the models. Many of the vibrator close-ups, for example, are over panties. These are site standards since I've seen many of these models elsewhere doing some really open, revealing and close-up things. Still, the sets are more realistic than some of the totally fake bondage I've seen elsewhere, but this is all pretty much bedroom stuff that you would do to your significant other. Fun first, experimental second, limit testing, probably not at all. Before you sign up, I have to tell you about the not-so-good stuff. First, the sets are broken up into multiple pieces. I personally hate that when it happens on a top-tier website, but I can understand why the webmaster here is doing it: If you only have one set every two weeks, people won't sign up. So, you get about 2 minutes of video every few days. Or you get about 30 images of a 90-180 image set. So that is a full photo/video set about every two-three weeks. Fortunately, they have been releasing the entire video at the end of the run for more recent videos, but you still have to go pull multiple videos to get an older set. And the photo sets are rarely combined so you will have to search through the set history to find the images. It makes me feel like I'm groveling for the goods and the Dom is doling them out to me....which, unfortunately, is true. But the absolute worst part of the site is the slow download speed. It takes FOREVER to download files. 15 minutes for a single 200 meg file. That's just insanely slow compared to other sites. I think they need to upgrade their modems... So, do I recommend this site? Well, yes, with reservations. For $25, you get a decent amount of high quality soft bondage material with popular models. But be prepared to spend a lot of time waiting for downloads and an eternity waiting for a complete set update. I joined for a month and will add it to my schedule to consider joining again when there are several more complete sets......in, what, January of 2020? Go take a look if you like this type of stuff. The images and sample videos you find are representative of the content of the site. 01-15-17  11:04pm Replies (0) Review 39 Sex Babes VR (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Best video quality of any VR site High-def (4K) 3D VR videos Mostly Popular, very attractive European models A few beautiful models I haven't seen elsewhere Mostly participatory videos These vids are VERY well directed. Girls that can be so-so elsewhere are AMAZING here. Very high entertainment level: The girls are into the scenes. Very fast download speeds Good navigation Release dates are posted Videos are subscriber-scored on a 10 point scale. Cons: Still a pretty small site Some videos are observational (i.e. watch b/g sex) A few videos start participatory, but switch to observational. No streaming or previews (minor for this format) No zip files of photos or captures but a few representative images for each set (minor) Tags listed with videos are not searchable. A few girls make a little too much noise but a genuinely quiet compared to some other sites. Bottom Line: I just added a few points to the score because, after watching every single VR video on this site, I can honestly say they are ALL very good to excellent. The girls are beautiful, the sets/locations are spectacular and well thought out (several scenes even have a strategically placed mirror that gives you nice views when the girl is heads-down.), the direction is outstanding and the new vids since I've been a member have been killer. This is the very definition of VR porn. I don't say this lightly: BEST VR SITE ON THE INTERNET! OK, back to original review. ============================= Yeah, this is pretty much what every VR site should emulate. There are a couple of videos on this site that will absolutely blow you away. One, with Nancy A, is probably the best VR video I have seen so far on any site. She's a frequent model on Met Art and does sex scenes on a few sites, but she really shines here like nowhere else. A few other models are at their best here, too. SexBabesVR Stats: (as of 2/1/17) About 40 videos 26 models Updates every 3 or 4 days Formats include Gear, Oculus/Vive low and high, and smartphone low and high 60 FPS typical Highest resolution is 3840x1920 Typical video is about 23 minutes Typical file size is about 5 gigs. Videos include tags 3D Video format is Left/Right Most videos start with the male prone, include a cowboy/reverse cowboy and end up with him in an upright missionary or doggie style with a pull-out or handjob money shot. Several sets includessome in-your-face views and all of them are good. The sets are upscale and attractive but not distracting, the lighting is perfect, the models are nicely done but not overly done up, they are well directed and it looks like they are enjoying themselves. Conversation is minimal and the males in the scenes do not make any sound. Most sets open with music and a brief set-up of some sort. Some of these are surprisingly good and I found myself saying "Woa!" as I realized the ungodly gorgeous girl in front of me was about to virtually fuck me. Lucky, lucky me! Overall, the site and videos have the look and feel of Wow-girls but there is no affiliation to any other site that I can find and the domain owners are different. This is a well run, site, though, so I'm pretty sure somebody with other sites and a lot of resources is running it. Good for them, GREAT for those of us with VR gear. Bottom line: although small, the quality here is among the best anywhere. This site is setting the bar. (I would score it higher, but it is still very small.) Go ahead and join for a month. it is totally worth it to see just how good high quality VR can be. I'll be back around at least annually....assuming I cancel, which I'm not sure I will do. 01-14-17  10:57pm Replies (0) Review 40 Virtual Porn 360 (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Least expensive "VR" site on the net! ($9 a month!)(See below for why...) Relatively large collection Huge variety (B/G, G/G, BDSM, shemale, fetish Full 360 degree videos Many observational boy/girl sex scenes File size are smaller because sets are short The video player on the web page displays flat video. (because the videos themselves are not 3 D) Cons: Videos are 360 but NOT 3D! (i.e not 2 channel) Video quality is not up to the standards of most other sites. (not a byproduct of the 360 view) Most videos are not participatory Many observational boy/girl sex scenes Downloads are slow File downloads are COMPRESSED in RAR format??!! Sets are generally less than 10 minutes The video player on the web page is a little slow. No release dates or scoring No index odd 90 second pause when watching videos on site Bottom Line: This site has made it onto a few top 10 or top 20 VR website lists so I went to check it out. For $9 a month, how could I resist? .....$9 a month!!! The site is a collection of over 100 360 degree VR videos with a very wide variety of genres including solo, straight, lesbian, BDSM, etc. The down side is that the vast majority of the videos are NOT participatory, meaning you just watch and sometimes it is from a considerable distance. Some specs: 120+ Videos Videos are NOT 3D (only a single channel) Most videos are high resolution No dates or scoring No models that I recognize (Alexa Nasha?) When streaming, there is an odd 90 second pause before videos start playing. This is probably supposed to allow you to get set up with your VR in streaming mode, but if you are just wanting to see what the video is about, it is pretty annoying. It may also be some kind of process that turns the 360 degree video flat, but I'm not sure. I would MUCH prefer that the video start and just press pause if I'm streaming. The lack of stereo 3D shooting is not immediately apparent with a headset on, but ultimately it is the downfall of these videos and probably this site. It IS possible to watch and enjoy these videos without 3D, but it is essentially like watching any flat video with your headset. This is why others say this site is not as immersive as some others. The 360 view is interesting, but only a few videos really take advantage of it. Most of the time what is behind you is a wall or something else that you would expect to be behind you. A few videos have multiple girls masturbating or having sex with others in different corners, so you have to turn to face them. Many of these videos seem to have been shot with a head mounted 360 rig. So the perspective is slightly higher than eye level and you can see the observers (your) body with a portion masked off with a graphic. The graphic is a little distracting, but I'm not sure what other options there would be. The Download files are compressed in RAR format. In the several decades I've been downloading things, I've never seen that and actually had to pull out an old program to decompress the files. Once decompressed, the actual video is almost exactly the same size as the compressed file (because, of course, MP4 already compressed the file.) I'm not sure I understand why the webmasters do this since it doesn't really reduce download speed and is a royal pain in the ass to decompress. Bottom line: The site is 360 but not 3D, which means it is not really a VR site...it is something....but slightly less than VR. Still for $9 a months, you are likely to find something here that interests you and that is a LOT less than many other sites with significantly less content. I scored the site primarily based on the lack of 3D video. If these videos had been 3D, the site would have scored in the high 70s. 01-14-17  09:02am Replies (0) Review 41 Real Teens VR (0) 68.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Real Teens. Good quality VR videos Cons: From the site format, this might be a bait site. Really small collection (23 videos) Ultra basic navigation Section called VR VOD where other vids are $10 each. Nice try. I'll wait for VR chat rooms. No update schedule Videos are not dated Videos are not scored. No search function No model listing. Bottom Line: As VR sites go, this is a really small one, but the VR and actress quality is not bad. This site is owned by the same group that owns Naughty America. That site includes VR but the actresses used are mature, established porn stars. From what I can tell, in an effort to generate more revenue, they separated out the "teen" VR from the mainstream stuff you can get at Naughty America and created this site. Kudos to those folks because people like me will join this site, even if it is only for a month....or for the few hours it takes to pull down every video on this site. What I really don't like, and am going to score accordingly for, is that the site creators went a little too far and created what appears to be a bait site. A bait site is a site designed to attract subscriptions with no clear intentions of maintaining the site beyond a certain point or providing ongoing, regular updates for the subscribers. Yes, this site has some good quality VR videos of young actresses, as advertised, but there is no clear indication of how often, if at all, the site is or has been updated and the site could very easily have just been created to suck money out of people looking for teen VR. A legitimate site lists release dates. A legitimate site provides regular updates. A legitimate site does not include a "store" selling 50 additional VR videos not shown on the site for $10 each. 50 additional VR videos! Ten...Dollars...Each!? And I'm not even counting the ubiquitous ads to join Naughty America with a single click. To be fair, these might all be oversights on the part of the webmasters, but they are huge, glaring, troubling oversights. Real Teen VR Stats: 23 videos. 23 models (all single girl sets) One fairly representative image per set No zips or screencaps Videos are not dated No indication of new release frequency Videos available in most VR formats. File sizes are not listed. These are actually pretty good VR videos. They are shot in the exact same style as the VR videos at Naughty America, probably because they are the same company and these videos were originally slated to go there. I did a review of the VR at Naughty America VR and many of those points apply here. All videos are VR viewer participatory (i.e. you fuck her) Most videos start (with you) prone and end up actively upright. The Actresses are a little too talkative. Some videos have drop-outs and/or abrupt transitions that hinder the VR experience. The models are 18-19. Although youth is beauty in today's society, several of these girls are young but not beautiful. Bottom line: Mixed. For $20, it is probably an acceptable site to visit for one month just to pull down the 23 videos. But the site appears to be a bait site designed specifically to get your money for those videos and never provide anything more. If you are the webmaster for this site, feel free to prove me wrong by providing past release dates, upcoming release schedules and regular updates to the site. I will gladly change my review and score. 12-14-16  09:41pm Replies (0) Review 42 Naughty America VR (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Relatively large collection of VR porn Many major US porn stars Huge variety of girls Generally good quality You get the entire Naughty America site. Cons: Video direction could be better Videos are not continuous (brief fades out and in) Many of the actresses are..um..very mature. Navigation for VR is really poor. There is a VR tab that shows the VR videos by date, popularoty or your favorites based on your scores, but you can't search just VR for a particular actress. You get all of her videos with no clear indicator that any videos are VR until you click on them individually. Somebody didn't think this through. Bottom Line: As always, I'm just laying out what I see and experience about a site with a minimal filter. I encourage you to share your experiences as well. Amazingly, I had never joined Naughty America before joining them specifically for the VR porn. Fortunately, a subscription for one of their areas provides access to the entire network and I generally like what I see in the network. This review is just for the VR portion of the network. Naughty America VR-specific Stats: About 95 VR sets I can't tell how many models there are because they are not broken out into VR only. Probably about 120. One new set every 3 or 4 days. Sets are dated and scored on a 5 star scale One large zip collection of medium resolution images for each set including a strip from the actress (kind of a screen test set) and then images that match the video, possibly screen caps. Format is side by side 180 degree with a fish-eye perspective. So far, they seem pretty consistent with good optics. Wide variety of girls and settings here, the same girls that are in the regular Naughty America videos. Some are beautiful, many are a little older and some are much older (40 plus). I have a very hard time watching the more golden-age girls. I joined this site as an add-on to another site called Real Teens VR, which is all sub-25 actresses. The two sites are affiliated with the young stuff going there and everything else landing here. It's about $$. As far as I can tell, all of these videos are participatory sex videos or 3-ways. There are no videos where you just watch a girl get off like I've mentioned about a few other sites. I think that is a plus. The scenarios are very basic, which is also a plus. Friend of your girlfriend, best friends girlfriend, friend of your daughter, stepdaughter, stepsister, etc. The category "Your mom's hot friend" is the tip-off that it is an older actress. For the most part, the male surrogate (you) in these sets is silent. There is occasionally some grunting or groaning or talking, which is a little disturbing sometimes. One thing that this site does a little differently is use multiple male positions in many of the VR sets. So they may start out with you (the male participant) sitting. Then you may be prone, naked and inactive. Then you are standing or kneeling on a bed thrusting away having active intercourse. It is much more of a traditional POV style. The active positions can be nice, but the transitions are instantaneous so you don't have a chance to prepare, mentally or otherwise. Ideally, there should be warning or the set-up should transition as part of the video. A few of the videos lead into the transition with the girl saying an appropriate thing like "OK, now I want you to fuck me doggie style", but most do not. Actually, I feel like the VR sets here are a little over-produced and under directed. There is a billboard image for each set that reminds me of old VCR video covers, so somebody has the budget to make these, but the direction in some of the sets is marginal. I can sometimes see the girl looking at somebody and clearly being directed to do something differently. And the videos often "drop out" for a second as they splice in two non-contiguous takes or cut out some error. That drop out can be very distracting because often the position will change, clothes will vanish, or an initial insertion will be missing. The removal of clothing and an initial insertion are kind of porn video gold from my perspective. They should never be omitted from a video. In a few videos the drop-out literally happens every few seconds. It really ruins the whole VR vibe. You can do cut-away's all day long in a traditional porn video, but you can't do them at all in POV or VR. Apparently somebody doesn't know that. Tech stuff. After looking through the 100 or so VR videos from their representative "billboards" I pulled down the images and about 2 dozen high-resolution Oculus-Rift/Vive videos. Unfortunately, the high resolution vids stutter and pixelate on my Vive set-up, so I had to pull down the medium resolution versions. Those work well and I can hardly tell the difference in the videos. (I am in the process of building a much faster machine for VR and will test with that, but apparently the fastest AMD CPU chip made to date isn't fast enough...Which explains why Oculus only supports Intel CPUs.) In any case, the video files are HUGE and they take FOREVER to download. (My entire VR collection is about 200 videos so far and it already exceeds one terabyte.) Expect it to take 20-30 minutes to pull down several files. I'm about out of space... Bottom line: Decent site. Huge variety. Popular and sometimes older porn actresses. It is totally and completely worth it to join Naughty America VR for the handful of VR sets you will like and the bucket-loads of POV and other regular video material that comes with it. But my rating is for the VR portion on 12-14-16  08:11pm Replies (0) Review 43 Holo Girls VR (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Wide variety of VR porn types Very large collection for this genre Generally very good quality Huge mix of actresses/actors here At least a few major porn stars Excellent navigation, sort and search functions New video every couple of days Unique "position" icon on each video shows whether you should be standing, sitting up, laying back or flat on your back to watch the video. (Very nice feature!) The site remembers what type of VR you have so you don't have to select from a list for each download. (Nice!) A few of the upskirt/face sitting scenes will, ah, take your breath away. Cons: Many scenes don't really take advantage of VR (i.e. some scenes are across the room) Huge mix of actresses/actors here. Girls are generally more mature. Videos are not quite as polished Bottom Line: Disclaimer: My goal here is to compare VR sites and to explain particular VR things that a site does well or not so well. As always, my objective is to share my experience. If your experience is different, you are welcome to share yours too! ======================= HoloGirlsVR is large for a VR site. But to be this large, it has perhaps made a few sacrifices in quality meaning you have to sift to find really good stuff that appeals to you. HoloGirlsVR Stats: 105 Videos 74 models Models appear to be popular US, Canadian and European porn stars. Most girls are in more than 1 video One new set every 3 or 4 days Release dates are listed Each set is rated on a 5 star scale Frame rates are not listed File sizes are not listed I'll use an analogy the webmaster may not like, but it is what comes to mind. Men's Warehouse. Now there is some pretty schlocky stuff at Men's Warehouse, but if you are willing to sift through enough stuff, you will probably find something you like. Conversely, Men's Warehouse sells a LOT of stuff, so SOMEBODY must like what they are selling,even the schlocky stuff. So this site is the Men's Warehouse of VR porn. Something for everybody. If that's what the webmasters are going for, they are killing it! One of the ways that the site tries to categorize things is by defining niches or collections. Nice job on that! There are several niches/collections that really lend themselves to the VR genre, and a few that don't. The face-sitting series is a great example of what VR porn can do. These girls stick their junk just beyond your tongue's reach above your face and I guarantee you will groan in approval when you experience a good example of it. However, one of the drawbacks of HD is that you might not really want to see some of these girls that close in good light. Keep looking, though, there will be a few that you like. It's OK to groan. Really. Slightly more tame is the upskirt category. This takes the porn upskirt genre to a higher level because you are laying prone under the girl involved as she stands directly over your head. Depending on the set, there is a broad range of views here from white panties (that get pulled aside) to complete nudity. This can be awesome if you find the right girl. Find her. Other collections include the Mistress T collection, which is a whole dom series where YOU are the submissive (not my thing but, hey, some folks love it.) and the GFE (Girlfriend Experience, I think) collection, which is generally a younger girl talking to you, masturbating and occasionally fucking you. There's an only girls collection that let's you watch two or more (up to about 8, I think) girls getting each other or themselves off. There are also a lot of uncategorized videos in a range of activities. I recall foot fetish sets and stocking sets and a LOT of girls covered with tattoos. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it is not something I'm used to. Sorry to bring this up, but something else I noticed was that several of the males in the sex videos were black. Seriously, Kudos to the site management for appealing to that potentially lucrative "blacked" porn market segment, but I'm a straight white guy who cannot get used to the idea of enjoying a VR segment with a hot girl when I look down and my junk is black. Again...men's warehouse. Something for everybody. Cool. With the larger variety of videos comes a wider range of talent. I'm not sure how to define this other than some scenes are seriously over acted. A few of the girls seem to never shut up. I'm not sure if this is just the girls or if it is actually scripted this way. Again, different tastes....but less is usually better in this case. The sets are generally nice, shot in homes or hotel rooms. The lighting is good but the masking for the VR is a little annoying when you notice it. They have blocked out anything that might distract you from the scene in front of you, which is more distracting than if they had left it. File sizes are not listed but they are pretty big! Vive/Oculus files are a gig to 2 gigs each. Oddly, the high-res generic files are 2-4 gigs each. Download speeds are pretty slow. File types: Android 5.0+ Gear VR Oculus (High and Low) Iphone/Android pre 5.0 Generic H.264 Tech stuff Update: I now have a dedicated VR computer with a very fast processor and video card. All o fthe Oculus/Vive files play fine. ...personally, although there are a few amazing sets on this site, I am a little disappointed. Why? Because many of the sets are watch others have sex sets rather than the fully immersive ME having sex sets. This completely defeats the opportunity available in VR. Overall, this is a great site to visit because of some of the unique sets you can find here, but I'm not sure how long it will be before I come bac 12-02-16  11:07pm Replies (0) Review 44 BaDoink VR (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Good quality VR Very consistent Multiple downloadable formats Many popular US porn stars Decent navigation All vids are dated and scored File sizes are listed Cons: Site is still a little small Highest bit rate files don't work well on underpowered PCs. (but other formats do and I can't really tell) You can't sort vids by score or model. (Everything is in reverse chronological order.) Models are not in alphabetical order (also reverse chronological order) There are only a few representative images for the sets and no zip files. I get that images seem counter to the technology, but you can't really tell what goes on in a VR video without them. Bottom Line: My viewing tools expanded recently and now includes an HTC Vive. If/when you buy one of these, be prepared to lock yourself in a room to binge a little on the relatively indescribable experience of VR porn. Remember to eat. That said, I joined 3 sites in search of quality VR porn and of those three, BadoinkVR is the best for my tastes, which is full-on straight sex. You can't rate these the same way as a "flat" porn site because the tech is new and there just isn't that much media out there...yet. So I'm going to score these a little differently, comparing them to each other rather than to a traditional site. BadoinkVR stats: About 90 sets About 90 models (some sets have multiple girls) So far most models only have one set. Models are mostly popular US porn stars with a few young eastern Europeans in the mix. 1 New set each week. Each set is dated and scored on a 10 point scale The scoring is pretty honest, maybe a bit lower than it should be. The frame rate is either 30 or 60 frames per second. Most are 60, which is terrific. File sizes are listed (Update: I recently built a new desktop computer that is dedicated to Vive VR use. On that machine, all of the High-res Oculus/Vive VR files from this site work perfectly.) Nearly all of these videos are 180 degree with side-by-side 3D. (This is nice because you can set your player once and not have to change it when the video format changes.) Most are shot with a person's body (AKA you) in the foreground laying on his (your) back. There may be a portion of a scene where you are standing (i.e. getting a BJ or ramming a girl from the rear who is also standing or doggy on a the edge of a bed). Typical POV-like stuff. If you line everything up right, you can be 20 again with a buff porn-dude bod. The males in these scenes never make a sound, which is terrific and correct for the scenario. (You WILL hear a male voice while watching these, but it will be your own.) The thought that I was really watching somebody else fuck that girl truly never entered my mind...in other words, the video crew did it right. The sets are typically very nice...most are in nice homes or buildings...but not too distracting. The lighting has to be perfect for these things and it is. The acting is pretty decent and the scripts are not embarrassing. Overall, the quality of the sets and the videos is impressive. I swear I could feel breath on my face a few times and caught a whiff of stripper perfume once or twice as well. Funny how the mind works. The vast majority of these sets include full-on sex but some are just VR masturbation scenes. Whoever runs this site knows what they are doing. There is a solo masturbation/toy scene with Tori Black, who is a world-class sexy-talk teaser. Also, there are one or two straight sex scene from a woman's POV and a few scenes with other couples. (Most notable is a 360 degree scene from 2015 with August Ames and 2 other couples. Yes, August ends up riding you.) Some scenes have an extra girl or an extra guy that the girl you are screwing is messing around with. A few scenes are two girls getting each other off. Noticeably absent from this site so far are any two girl scenes with one girl on your dick and the other on your face. I'm sure they will have that here eventually... Formats include: Mobile LQ Mobile HQ Vive/Oculus Gear VR Playstation VR (Some of these files are the same, but they spell it out by device to make choosing easier) These files are HUGE so expect it to take some time to download. A 25 minute video ranges in size from about 2 gigs for low-res mobile to about 5.5 gigs for high-res Oculus/Vive files. Overall, though, download speeds are not too bad considering the size of these things. Tech stuff: I have been having trouble getting the Steam-based Whirlygig or Virtual Desktop players to work correctly for my Vive, so I've been using Simple VR and downloading the High def mobile videos instead of the "Vive/Oculus" videos. The high-def mobile vids work fine. Video compression is good and there is no stuttering, although there is some pixelation when I fast forward too much. One minute there's a beautiful girl bouncing on my dick and the next minute it is a block character from Minecraft. Woa! Pressing pause seems to fix it. (My very-fast AMD Opteron gaming rig is only about 2 years old but I had to buy a new 8-gig Radeon RX480 video card to support VR. The card is a little buggy and might be the issue.) Bottom line: If you have a VR set-up and are into straight-sex, this is a "must join" site for at least a month. The site is well-run and what they lack in quantity, they more than make up for in quality. 12-02-16  07:52pm Replies (0) Review 45 18 Closeup (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Very good quality videos Decent sized collection Dates back to 2007 Almost entirely young (under 20), petite, slender attractive models (no unibrows, etc....some eastern block teeth, though.) Several popular European models from when they were younger Most models are shaved but a few are trimmed or full. Every update is dated "Bonus" videos from other sites like Wet and Puffy Cons: The site IS updating, but only one small addition once a week. When updates occurred before, they were once or twice a week but were very small. one video segment from a larger set, just screen caps, just photos, etc. A few choice photo sets, like one of Caprice, have broken links. Some MPG/WMV videos are actually avi. No idea why. No scoring of videos or sets. No ability to tag favorites. Downloads are very slow. The price ($29.95 USD) seems a little steep for the content, but not outrageous. Bottom Line: This is another "18" site Mostly solo but some girl/girl sets Stripping, masturbation, penetration, some speculum, some peeing, some panty stuffing. The name says it all. Some serious close-ups of mostly really cute, young models! The site video content is very similar to InTheCrack.com (ITC) and it also reminded me a little bit of ALSScan.com (ALS) or First Time Videos (FTV). ITC does a lot of close-ups and ALS is almost entirely teen models. FTV is another site similar to this one except this one is almost entirely indoor shooting. The collection here is nowhere near as large as those sites, but it is larger than many other similarly priced but lower quality sites The girls are all eastern European and several have been on other sites over the years. Caprice and several others will be easily recognized, although some have different names here. There are also many that I don't recognize from other sites. Most are quite pretty and many have that "cute" factor that is solid gold for teen sites. Sadly, as is the case with many semi-pro eastern European models, their expressions can be a little off by American standards...a little goofy, frightened or spooky. Fortunately, the majority of the videos are not focused on faces at all. At first I thought the site had stopped updating. I think that was because navigation for the site is a little tricky. The Videos page shows recent updates but the Photos page shows mid 2015 as the most recent update. And the upate log page has not been updated since 2015. Some udpates can only be found by scrolling down on the "home" page. The page only shows 6 sets from mid-october back to September, so anything that might have been here between September of this year and July of 2015 might not be showing up anywhere. They are not updating in the update log, in models, etc. Updates are occurring about once a week and they are single videos of a larger model set, or images, or bonus content. Honestly, this is one of the most confusing sites I've seen when it comes to finding stuff. Some quick stats: 126 models or female couples About 725 video segments About 25 20 meg photo sessions (1333x2000) Screencaps for most videos Sets date back to 2007 There is an update log (through July of 2015) Everything is dated. Videos come in multiple formats, usually 3 sizes. Unfortunately the format of the files is often incorrect (MP4 instead of WMV, AVI instead of MP4, etc.) The sizes are usually correct, though. Downloads are slow. Very slow. Navigation is pretty basic. You can view by update or by model or you can view the update page or look at the update log to see all updates through mid-2015. I have no idea why they continue to post updates on the home page, but do not add them to the log or update model info. Something is kind of messed up with that. There is a search function, sort of, but it allows you to search by a specific attribute or video activity like anal, boobs, cervix, discharge, finger, gape, etc. Kind of odd, but it does seem to work, at least with newer videos. One thing I like is that all of the videos include a little synopsis of what goes on in them....similar to ITC but without the check marks for the best videos. Also, the file names seem to make sense. Girls name and segment number. There are about 21 bonus videos from Wet and Puffy, Wet and Pissy and Nubiles.net. These are full length videos, not just teasers. Bottom line: I'm giving this site a 77 because a) it has some really good solo girl content, but b) navigation is very basic and links are broken or mislabeled, c) the webmaster is not posting/cross referencing updates correctly, and d) downloads are very slow. If you like "InTheCrack.com" but also have a preference for the younger models, this site might be worth a visit. Take a look at the models and know that none of them are the least bit shy. 10-17-16  07:36pm Replies (0) Review 46 Jerkoff Instructions (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Looks like there are about 1500 videos Videos date back to 2004 Good quality streaming videos Many popular US porn stars here. Many! Some of the videos are quite good All videos are dated Cons: Videos are STREAMING ONLY Videos are sold separately for $7.99-8.99 EACH. Navigation is pretty basic Navigation is frustratingly slow Scenarios can be a little monotonous. Some of the videos will make you laugh out loud. Bottom Line: Not sure what to say about this site.... I joined SexPOV and purchased this one as a $10 add on. Both sites are very similar. (I'll try to review SexPOV later.) I joined because some of the videos looked amusing...and they are. Each video follows some kind of theme script and the range covers every scenario you can think of...everything from baby-sitter, to step-sister, to "jerk-off or my dad will fire you", to a hot alien female that needs your sperm to build a slave army. These are not your typical couple of lines from the girl scenes. They are long, long monologues that I'm surprised most of these girls could pull off (oh, wait, editing). But I guess scripting like this is kind of typical for the porn stars that are here. Shyla Jennings, for example, has 6 sets. Lexi Bloom has 9 sets. Riley Reid has 14. What isn't typical is that there are no men. None...except a hand once in a while to help with lotion or something. There are categories for the videos like Amazon, Asians, Babysitter, Boss, bratty girl, college girl, etc. There are some fetish videos too, like foot, bondage, a couple of lactation videos (as in breast pumps) and a bunch of humiliation videos...something for everybody, it seems. Each video starts out pretty basic and usually innocent. Then the girl has a confession to make or something. She likes you. She found your porn stash. She saw you watching her. She noticed you have a hard-on. She thinks you have a really tiny dick. Whatever. She then usually takes her clothes off so you can jerk off to her. Sounds OK, right? But... The majority of these scenes really aren't sexy enough to do much...for me anyway. They are cute, and a few of the girls are hot enough, but the simulated sex stuff can be weird and the girls aren't masturbating with you, they are just posing. Posing. Usually not on their backs or their stomachs or in any kind of open position. Just posing. And perhaps this is some kind of fitting joke on their part, but many of the girls only pose, or simulate, or whatever for about 30 seconds, then they are done because, I assume, they believe you are. Weird. Oh, and in a lot of scenes, for some odd reason, the girl will give a jerk-off hand gesture. Really? When, in any real-life situation ever, has a woman actually given you a jerk-off gesture besides in a Detroit strip club or a red light district in a foreign country? Never, that's when. (Yes, it's porn, not real life, but I've never seen a girl do this in a regular porn video without a dick in her hand, have you?) It just seems like an odd slur in a scenario where I'm supposed to be in the room... The framing is just OK. There are some close-ups, but not nearly enough. Some scenes have no close ups at all. A few of the scenes are nearly clinical. I can't figure out if that is on purpose or if it is related to the talent level of the actress. There are a few scenes that remind me of the old Twisty's or Danni's scenes where the girl teases the hell out you. These scenes are rarer than a nice tie at Burlington's but there are some if you look hard enough. My acid test for any porno scene is simple. Turn off the sound. Watch the video. Did it get you off or seriously hard? Yes? It passes. No? It fails. Nearly all of these videos failed. I mentioned before that I thought the site would be amusing. Well, after watching about 50 of these videos, it can be very amusing. Not necessarily exciting or stimulating, but amusing. Jana Jordan in a scene where she asks her step dad (me, right?) why she can't have a credit card is amusing. She's pretty good, but she is in her 30s, so the step dad scenario was a bit of a stretch. The videography is generally pretty good. Lighting is good. But the sets look like they are all in somebody's apartment or maybe a house...nothing at all fancy. Many girls have multiple sets with different themes but in the same location and on the same day. Easy gig for them. One day model fee. No sex. Possible royalties from video sales. What's not to like? OK, here's why I scored it a 72. It is a STREAMING ONLY site! WTF? Now it does stream in 3 speeds (medium high and mega..whatever that last thing is, it doesn't work on my computer), but you can't download anything. No vids, no pictures, nothing. If you want anything to keep, it will cost you...cost you $7 to $9 per video. Yeah. About that. No thanks. There are many other competitive sites that have as good as or better flirt scenes that I can download and keep. Bottom Line? As far as "simulated sex" sites, this one seems pretty good, I guess. And there is a broad range of scenarios to choose from. But the complete lack of any downloading without paying extra per-download is the deal killer here. If you are into this type of site and you don't mind that you can't keep the videos, give it a shot. Unfortunately, I can't recommend it. 10-09-16  10:21pm Replies (2) Review 47 Exploited College Girls (0) 77.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: Large collection (Over 400 scenes) All college aged models Mostly attractive models Mostly exclusive models Access to a couple of other sites with similar themes. Cons: Photo images sizes are small Identical format for each video can be monotonous. Seems like one guy just recording his conquests... Navigation is very basic Bottom Line: I apologize, but I cancelled my membership here before I had a chance to collect stats and do a review. Here's is what I do have. This is obviously a "college-girls paying for tuition" site, real of fake, I can't tell. The videographer/blurred out male star of the scenes travels to different colleges and records his meeting with, conversing with, squeezing, fingering, often jamming a sex-toy into and ultimately fucking and then coming all over the young, relatively attractive girl in each scene. Being relatively attractive is kind of easy when you are in the most admired demographic on the planet (18-22 female), but a few of these girls are truly beautiful. There are many scenes, although only the recent ones are in HD (720p) and the oldest ones are an unwatchable resolution like 640x480. The newer scenes alternate between POV and fixed camera off to the side. Some of the POV and POV-like (i.e. camera at foot of bed recording a reverse cowboy) material is quite good, but much of it is jittery and the field of POV view is limited. Some of the scenes have a split video (POV and from another angle) which I personally dislike a lot. I do not recall any issues downloading the videos or zip files. Images are small, like 1200-1400 pixels on the wide-side small. The network includes a "casting couch" site, and a "broke model" site. Both of these sites followed a similar, narrow scenario which made me immediately fast-forward in search of the good stuff. There was also a site called "net video girls" which just seemed like a lot of unrelated amateur nude-model stuff thrown together like a slightly pornographic subreddit. Bottom Line: There are a lot of sites that use this format but this one is as good as any of the others that I've seen, perhaps a little better. So if you like the format, you have nothing to lose by signing up for a month...well...except for $25 if you really hate the site. 10-07-16  11:23pm Replies (1) Review 48 Errotica Archives (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: This site has been part of the ever-expanding Met-Art Network for many years. (i.e. high quality) 1 exclusive set a day since 2005 (over 3600 sets, easily 100,000 images) Models are usually beautiful and popular Sets are very well done. Many sets are as good as the best Met Art sets. Models might be a little more revealing here than on Met Art. Cons: It seems as though the The site has become sort of a spill-over from Met-Art where archived shoots or perhaps extra shots from a set are packaged and displayed. Many sets are models we will never see again (because they only did one or two shoots and then quit.) Navigation, though good, is not quite as good as Met-Art. Bottom Line: I published a review of Errotica Archives in 2012 and rated it among the top soft core photography sites on the Internet. That review expired so I thought I would refresh it with my impressions from the 6 or so times I have joined the site since then. It is still up there among the best nude photography sites on the Internet, but I can't rate it as high as I did in 2012. The collection dates all the way back to 2004 and even the stuff from back then is top notch. Many of the models you know and love were on this site before they were anywhere else...although sometimes with different names. With over 12 YEARS of stuff, it is a lot of fun looking. All but the newest European models have sets here. All of them! Navigation is good for a site this large. You can search by model or rating or month. Images appear in the same tab, though, so remember to go back rather than close (I STILL wish they would make this more consistent across the Met-Art network sites..) All set come in 3 sizes ranging from small to extra-large but the size depends on the age of the set. Recent images are 6000x4000 or so, large enough to be lifesize if printed out at 72dpi. And most images actually look good at that kind of resolution. Everything is available in zip files and downloading is relatively fast. The girls all appear to be comfortable with the photographers. There is a really good mix of full body and close up shots here and, unlike many similar sites, most of the girls are not shy and don't mind showcasing their assets with close-ups. There is a new set every day. There is a wide variety of photographers and they all have slightly different styles, locations and models. Once in a great while, they will release a much older set but these are not re-releases, just archive or perhaps extra images from a different set. All sets are clearly dated. Just a reminder that this is a softcore site. There are a few lightweight girl/girl scenes, but there are no sex scenes, no insertions, very little masturbation, no true sex on this site. There may be a few unusual sets from prior years (maybe a girl with her hands tied or something), but this is a 99.9% nude modeling site. Met-Art links all of their sites together so, for example, you can see links to sets on other sites for a model you are looking at, but each site requires its own membership and associated fee, so the links can be frustrating at times. Once in a while they will allow access to a site on the network for free for a limited time but generally, you have to pay for access to each site. There is a pull-down menu that allows you to jump between sites in the network that you are a member of. So....what about this site isn't as good as it used to be? Well, I think it might be two or three things. First, this is clearly a site for surplus or archived sets (hence the name). Some of these sets were archived because they were not quite suitable for Met Art. Either something didn't click with the set or, on the other hand, maybe there are too many close-ups! (Not really a problem for me...). But there seem to be more of these B-grade sets than there used to be. Second, there are also a lot of slightly less impressive one-hit wonders in the mix. Occasionally, there will be an introduction set for a new model on Met Art. Then maybe there will be one more set on Met Art, then some time later a third set will show up here. This is because the model only did a few sets and then quit, but there are sets on the shelf. And sometimes....these models were not A-list models to begin with. In fact, that is the third reason the site doesn't rank as high this time around. Global supply. In 2010-2012, there was this bevy of incredibly beautiful women in eastern Europe that were shooting for the Met-Art, FemJoy and a few other networks. It was a bumper crop of OMFG women! Now, there are still many, many incredibly beautiful women within the Met-Art network, but to produce the kind of volume this network needs to provide 15-20 new sets or videos a day, there has to be a constant flow of new and consistent talent. Personally, I think that talent is becoming harder and harder to find and the result is a higher proportion of sets with unpolished or less attractive women. This is probably pervasive with all of the sites that use Eastern European models and it explains why some photographers are heading to Brazil and central America more often. I'll leave it at that but I'm sure you get the point. The supply, relative to demand, seems to be dwindling. (and I'll bet the popular models are getting more expensive.) OK, where was I... In spite of my opinion that the site is not quite as good as it was in 2012, it is still an outstanding site! If you like Met-Art, Femjoy or similar sites, you will love this one. And considering the volume of material, it is still an excellent deal. 10-07-16  10:24pm Replies (0) Review 49 Femjoy (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Some of the best European models Wonderful sets and lighting Top notch photography Great interaction 1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week Models generally are not shy Good site layout 3 image file/zip file sizes for each set. Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster) Excellent value for the money Cons: Navigation still not up to par with the best sites Videos are a bit snoozy Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic Bottom Line: I noticed my review of this site expired and there are no current reviews, so I'm updating my old review. Very little has changed since 2014 except the number of sets has gone up a lot. Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open and the site seems to e getting a little more explicit than it was in the early days. No problem with that! Lets talk about content: The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 4000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere. Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views of great looking models. The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p. So..what's not to like? Well...there are STILL a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best. First, the navigation is still a little off. There are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. You have to click "back to gallery" or pageback to return to the gallery page. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving because you will inevitably close an image and end up exiting the set. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery). And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I was told they were working on this in 2014. Apparently, they lied. Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, showy, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months! 10-06-16  10:32pm Replies (6) Review 50 In The Crack (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Beautiful models High Quality, polished videos In your face format Many popular models and porn stars Some interesting lesbian scenes Terrific views.... Tons of content (Since 2001!) Unique tiered payment structure Cons: Not much to say here: Some of the videos can be a bit slow, but the webmasters warn you. Older vids are not HD (of course...) Bottom Line: When I first saw this site, I thought it was about anal. Yep. NOT about anal. It's about taking the best porn stars and models in the industry and showcasing their bodies. And I mean ALL of their bodies...up close and personal. There is not a single male in any set on the entire web site. It's all about the girls. From what I can tell, there are over 1200 video sets here, each with between 3 and 6 10-20 minute videos. For the most part, each set starts out with a basic strip segment showing off the girl's usually amazing physique, then there is a close-up/spreading segment, then a fingering session, then a dildo/vibrator session and then one or more sessions that might include peeing, an anal dildo session, a speculum, or just a conversation between the model and the photography crew. The models here are hot, well built, popular and professional. Lucy Lu is here, Saphira is here, Elsa Jean is here, heck even Melena G is here doing things you would never see her do on Met Art. Yum! If you are somebody who really enjoys amazing bodies, unobstructed views and in-your-face close-ups, this is a terrific site for you. The webmasters provide a little narrative for each segment, explaining what the girl does and giving a check-mark of approval to those they think are really good. They even warn you if a segment is a little too slow. Nice touch. Many models have two or more complete sets. To me, this confirms that the girls are treated well by the photography team and that they enjoy the shoots. Many of the shoots are in local (to the girls, I guess) hotels, but some are in exotic locations. Lighting, focus, formatting, sets, props, toys and overall photographic/videographic details are excellent. Oh, there are a few pretty good lesbian scenes, also. The format of these sets is a little different in that the girls are basically showing themselves and each other off for the camera. They are into each other for the most part, but they are basically going look at this girls pussy. Isn't it awesome!..or something similar. Some of these sets are pretty awesome, but some that you want to be REALLY awesome, Like Little Caprice and Melissa Mendini, are a little..awkward. And a few are just a bunch of hot models stripping down for the camera. Eh. Still some great views, though. Navigation is good, allowing you to see things chronologically or by model. You can also select by model age (??), nationality and shoot location. The tiered payment structure is worth mentioning. You can get streaming only for $10 a month, I think. Then the pice goes up depending on how big you want your downloads to be, up to 4K for the latest videos. unlimited 1080p downloads is $39 a month, I think. This site reminds me a little of ALSScan, except that site is much more lesbian oriented and the girls are more into each other than the camera. This site is more polished, more professional...and the overall package puts In The Crack among the top 10 sites for me. If you haven't figured it out yet, I highly, highly recommend this site. 10-06-16  09:58pm Replies (0) Shown : 26-50 of 89 Page : Page 1 2 3 4    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.35 seconds.