Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 21 Naturals

21 Naturals (0)

Newbie
82*
skippy (0) 02-26-17  05:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good quality videos.
Nice looking models.
More fetish material than expected
Some of the bonus material is very good.
Sets are dated in both main and bonus sites
Everything is HD!
Image zips available for all scenes
Cons: Lots of effort to get you to sign up to the other two 21 networks.
Sex is competent, not necessarily exciting.
More fetish material than expected.
Filter function is counter-intuitive.
Some of the bonus material is better than some of the main material...
Bottom Line: It seems that 21Sextury has decided to add shelf-space and increase revenue by breaking up their network into 3 separate networks. That's OK, I guess, but the lines between these networks are a little blurry and arbitrary and the material in some doesn't make sense.

Here are a few stats that I could figure out.

21 Naturals:
About 780 sets on main site.
About 250 female and male actors listed
Sets are all dated
Videos are all HD up to 1080p.
Videos are scored via thumbs up/down.
Bonus sites contain another 1000 or so videos.
Videos are NOT tagged so you don't know if you are watching an anal or fetish video until you are.
You can select anal,for example, in a search filter, but you cannot de-select it.


21 Naturals is billed as the "natural" site with young, fit girls in the no-longer-trending white-room style of video shooting. If it were a site filled with JUST naturals, as billed, I would be pretty happy...but it isn't. It is also the default location for foot fetish and anal videos. In fact, those types of videos seem to outnumber the videos that I signed up for. If you are into anal there is some decent stuff here. Unfortunately, I'm not. Same with foot fetish stuff. I'm not into that either. Oh well, I guess I should have read on the preview page......oh wait, they don't say ANYTHING about fetishes within 21 naturals on the preview page. They say you have access to over 15 sites and over 100 new videos a month and don't elaborate any further. They show 2 OTHER sites called 21foot-art and 21erotic-anal, but they look like different sites in the preview, not integral parts of 21naturals. Similarly, the images on the 21naturals preview page are young solo models or straight sex images that fit with "natural". No fetishes shown or implied at all. More than a little misleading, especially if you think, like I did, that one of those other sites might be 21sextury. Nope. They are all micro-sites with a specific theme like Asian, big boobs, booty, more anal, DP or whatever. Now, in all honesty, these are awesome bonus sites compared to those offered in some other networks, so I can't knock them. But even the bonus sites don't really lend themselves to categories in some cases. The Bitch Club for example, includes many different types of scenes including, yep, some foot fetish and anal.

The videos are well done, well lit, well directed and the models are usually quite beautiful even in the bonus sites. The bonus sites, by the way, have the same look and feel, both in navigation and in content, as the main site, so I suspect that these bonus sites may be available in the other two networks. Don't know for sure.

Every scene is scripted and acted out. The interaction between the couple is often somewhat limited and you often don't see much chemistry between them. It isn't that the chemistry isn't there, I guess, but you don't see it. Scenes are often slow and the couples often don't even look at each other during sex, with very little kissing or affection. Kind of weird for this style of video, which can be both more affectionate and more kinetic on some other sites.

They do have an interesting "filter" system that allows you to select options like anal so the resulting videos include it. But the "filter" is backwards. FILTER means exclude, not include. So if I de-select anal, I should not get anal. Instead, when I deselect anal, all I get is anal! Deselect foot fetish and anal? you get both. In the meantime, if all I want to see is latinas having straight sex, nope. I can choose latinas, but it includes all latina scenes including fetishes. I apologize for ranting about this, but it is clear that the webmasters don't understand that, although they've put great effort into search functions, these functions are counter-intuitive.

Overall, I would compare this site to Wowgirls X-Art or Joymii. The material is very similar, with interaction perhaps a little less intimate than those sites. But these webmasters really missed the mark on determining where to separate their three networks and how to market them. Half of the material here belongs in a new network called 21fetish.

Is it worth visiting? Well, yes, it is,especially for the relatively low price. If you like anal or foot-jobs, there is some good stuff here. There is also some good straight sex stuff here, all in HD. But I am going to penalize the site a couple of points because of the totally whacked way they threw the fetishes into this otherwise young-girl straight-sex site, how the filters don't work and how the landing page shows you locked sets from the other networks in an effort to bait you into signing up over there.

I hope you found this useful! If so, a trust vote would be appreciated!

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Monahan (0) Good review Skippy and it reflects many of the same issues that caused me to walk away from the original 21 Sextury several years ago. They were guilty of false promos back when they decided to split off 21Sextreme after guaranteeing then current subscribers would be grandfathered no change in our membership (we were not).

Quality of product was fine but their business practices totally suck.

02-26-17  06:04pm

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (0) NICE REVIEW.

I GAVE YOU A POSITIVE TRUST VOTE ON 05-13-12, SOON AFTER YOU JOINED PU.
I WROTE: "2 nice reviews. Honest opinions. Good start."

I'M NOT SURE WHY YOU ARE ASKING FOR POSITIVE TRUST VOTES IN THIS REVIEW.
GETTING A BADGE DOES NOT SEEM TO MATTER MUCH FOR TODAY'S PU.

OF COURSE, IF THEY START MAILING OUT THE BADGES FOR REAL, MAYBE WE COULD START WEARING THE BADGES IN A PORN PARADE?

BUT MAYBE AMANDA AND SOME OF THE OTHER PU STAFF COULD GIVE YOU POSITIVE TRUST VOTES: YOU'VE CERTAINLY EARNED THEM WITH YOUR REVIEWS AND OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SITE.

02-26-17  08:41pm

Reply To Message

3

skippy (0) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Hi,

I put it in there on a whim. Wanted to see if it made a difference since I've been posting forever and haven't gotten a new trust vote in a long time. I'm about 5 votes short of getting that badge and I think it is the only one I don't have. No big deal. I'll probably pull the request since it seems a little tacky to solicit for votes....

02-27-17  07:46am

Reply To Message

4

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #3 - skippy :

LIKE I SAID IN MY REPLY, YOU CERTAINLY DESERVE THE TRUST BADGE,
FOR YOUR MANY REVIEWS AND COMMENTS.

PU MEMBERS DON'T GIVE A TRUST VOTE LIKE IN EARLIER DAYS.
BECAUSE MANY NEWBIES DON'T EVEN REALIZE IT CAN BE GIVEN.
AND THERE'S NOT MUCH PRACTICAL REASON TO GIVE OR RECEIVE A TRUST VOTE TODAY.

BUT LIKE I WROTE, MAYBE AMANDA AND THE PU STAFF CAN GIVE YOU SOME VOTES.
IF YOU HAVE NO OBJECTION, I CAN START A THREAD ASKING FOR PU MEMBERS TO START GIVING MORE TRUST VOTES.

AND MENTION YOUR NAME IN PASSING AS ONE OF THE MEMBERS WHO DESERVE THEM.

(IF YOU DON'T THINK IT'S TOO TACKY. OR FAN-BOYISH.)

(I'M NOT GAY, BUT I DON'T SEE WHY PU MEMBERS CAN'T GET A BADGE-IF THEY WANT ONE.)

LOL

02-27-17  09:58am

Reply To Message

5

jook (0) REPLY TO #4 - lk2fireone :

Not to digress, but I want more trust badges! I have 1 lousy badge, always one of the minute irksome things in my life, haha.

Which reminds me of the Reggie Hammond character... when asked what kind of cop he was, he responded:

You know what I am? I'm your worst fuckin' nightmare, man. I'm a nigger with a badge which means I got permission to kick your fuckin' ass whenever I feel like it!

02-27-17  03:19pm

Reply To Message

6

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #5 - jook :

I JUST GAVE YOU A POSITIVE TRUST VOTE.
MAYBE I SHOULD START A THREAT, TELLING PU MEMBERS WE SHOULD START GIVING OUT MORE TRUST VOTES.
jook HAS BEEN CONTRIBUTING TO THE SITE FOR OVER 3 YEARS, BUT AS FAR AS TRUST VOTES GO, HE'S ALMOST INVISIBLE: 2 TRUST VOTES TOTAL.

02-27-17  08:08pm

Reply To Message

7

jook (0) REPLY TO #6 - lk2fireone :

Thank you!
I wasn't entirely serious, though it really does irk me to see newcomers with unhelpful reviews getting such merit.
However, I really don't think such a distinction is necessary. One can tell from reading a review whether it's reliable and/or helpful.

I know this is never gonna happen, but formatted or semi-formatted reviews that more or less force a reviewer to include certain information would go a long way to helping the quality of reviews. I think newcomers need this structure and I speak for myself when I was a newbie. But alas, this idea has been discussed and tossed in the trash bin.

02-28-17  03:56am

Reply To Message

8

Amanda (0) REPLY TO #7 - jook :

It would really be nice if more new reviewers (however few and far between they are) would include more info at times, but I think that sometimes they just don't think to or some things just don't matter to them so they think they likely won't matter to others. I can tell you that we get more than a few "reviews" at times that involve no pros and a person just airing out their grievances about feeling ripped off by a site. Hehe. I guess my suggestion would be for all of us as a community to comment on new reviews and maybe just ask questions to perhaps direct a new reviewer in a certain direction. I see many of you already do that, which is great.
02-28-17  07:00am

Reply To Message

9

jook (0) REPLY TO #8 - Amanda :

I believe you! I once got pissed at Khan in my early days for not including a review that basically said the site sucks, haha.

I've seen comments by some of the old timers that they lost their motivation to comment on newbie reviews and I understand that. It's so commonplace. I feel the same, though once in a while I say something.

I stick to my guns though about a standardized review. So many other sites have it and it seems to work well. It doesn't need to be rigid and can continue to encourage free-flow thoughts. However, necessary info to allow someone to make a judgment about whether to join should be there. Simple stuff like whether the site is streaming only, video quality, number of scenes, etc. One of my pet peeves is that reviewers often don't report on the nature of the content, though sometimes it's obvious from the site name. Other times, not.

One of the major arguments against standardized reviews is that reviewers only need to review the guidelines about reviews. In a perfect world, that might work, but realistically, how many people read guidelines?

One of these decades all you naysayers will see the light. ;))

02-28-17  01:59pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.