| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for replying to my review. I'll try and justify my score of 65. I was originally going to give it a 70, however based on PU rating definitions, my rating fits the description which I think suits my criticism; hence this site "Needs Work" and I also give it a "low recommendation." If my buddy had 32$ to spend, I'd tell him to go elsewhere. This site has to many issues.
Furthermore, I believe you misunderstood me; or rather I perhaps didn't explain it properly.. I have no issues with the quality of the camera equipment (as in megapixels). I mean the actual photo-shoot. A picture set which is engaging, with flair, which really showcases the girls. It's the photographers job to take a woman and make her a superstar. I find the photographers here lack this flair.
I didn't download one set, therefore I have nothing to comment about download speed. However, as I browse through the site (just browsing - therefore 1 click at a time, 1 photo at a time, or 1 set of thumbnails at a time), these servers are slow by today's standards. I don't want to wait 10 seconds (you heard right, sometimes it's 10 seconds) for a set of thumbnails to load. Let's not hide it, when you find a nice set you're ready to jack-off too, what a massive disappointment to have to wait for the pics to load. This is basic I would assume.
Befittingly you share the same opinion as me about the site navigation and search engine. "Needs work!" So I don't need to get into this topic.
I will however give credit when credit is due; the girls are gorgeous here. But many porn sites showcase gorgeous natural beauties. So to me, it is not enough to warrant the price considering all the issues. This brings about the issue of value.
So I think it is fitting (in my opinion) that this site "Needs work" and therefore a score in the 60's is accurate given the PU's rating definition.
I do appreciate criticism; I don't take it as negative. As long as people remain objective and non-personal, I'll respect your views opinions.
|
07-27-11 10:46pm
|
Review
2
|
FTV Girls
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The girls are absolutely hot. There are lots of them. |
| Cons: |
Though the girls are hot, the photography is only average. It's not up to today's standards. The photo-shoots are average.
The site navigation is also outdated. I'd also like to add terrible. I feel it's like it's a site from 10 years ago.
The search option need work as well. How could you miss out on this aspect when you showcase so many models. It lacks depth and is confusing.
This site is really slow. I have a high speed connection (32 mbps on speedtest.net) and loading times are slow and choppy at times.
I have nothing to say about the vids. I didn't watch many of them. I'm a pictures guy. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been wanting to try out this site for a long time now. Now that I've become a member, I'm very disappointed with it. I'm also disappointed that it got such a high rating considering lots of mediocre aspects. I didn't even download one set. I'm going back to my old porn collection. I'm dissatisfied with the content, site, and value praised about this site. |
|
07-25-11 11:02pm
Replies (4)
|
|
