Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
|
05-30-07 04:33pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
2
|
Barely Legal
(0)
50.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
1. Hot girls. |
Cons: |
1. DOWNLOAD RESTRICTIONS!!!
2. Navigation is retarded.
3. Poor photo selection.
4. They make absolutely sure that you don't know what you're getting into, so you can't see how shitty this site is until you join! |
Bottom Line: |
You'd think that a company like Hustler, with such a wealth of content, would make a site worth joining. But they protect their content like a mother grizzley bear, in fear that they just might give us our money's worth. This site is horrible and a huge ripoff. Hustler is greedy. |
|
05-30-07 04:19pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
3
|
White Teens Black Cocks
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
1. Hot little white girls.
2. No download restrictions.
3. Most of the content is quality.
4. Girls get fucked hard the right way.
5. Movies in 2 formats: WMV and AVI. |
Cons: |
1. No zip files for photos.
2. Not a bunch of content.
3. Updates aren't regular. |
Bottom Line: |
Pretty good site. If they updated at least once a week, they'd have a great site. Comparable to TryTeens and GirlsGotCream, some of the same girls, but different sex scenes. |
|
05-30-07 04:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Try Teens
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
1. Some very hot girls.
2. Clarity/resolution is getting better with newer updates.
3. A few hundred photos (plus vidcaps) per sex scene.
4. Good quality photos.
5. No download restrictions.
6. Includes access to a few other sites.
7. These girls get fucked hard and well. |
Cons: |
1. Updates aren't always regular.
2. Older content is fuzzy resolution.
3. No zip files for photos. Obviously they do this so you have to spend more time on their site.
4. Not a huge wealth of content available. |
Bottom Line: |
Pretty good site over all. Comparable to their sister sites: girlsgotcream, whitegirlsblackcocks. Beware of the male "actor" who looks like a gorilla - he makes animal noises and is louder than the girls. Very annoying! |
|
05-30-07 04:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
5
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
50.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
1. Some really hot girls.
2. Clarity/resolution is decent. |
Cons: |
1. The guy who films/fucks the girls is super-annoying.
2. His camerawork sucks.
3. He talks way too much.
4. He rarely gets the girls off, because he's too preoccupied with his own pleasure to fuck them right. |
Bottom Line: |
Hot girls, terrible site. It's too bad that these girls chose to be on this site instead of a better one. If the guy shut up, then the site might be tolerable. He should fire himself and invest in 1) a competent cameraman, and 2) a dude who can actually please these ladies. |
|
05-30-07 03:46pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
6
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
|
05-30-07 03:35pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
7
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
60.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
1. Has some cute girls.
2. Gives you access to several other sites free.
3. No download restrictions.
4. Has zip files for photo galleries. |
Cons: |
1. Cameramen are terrible. Their bad camerawork ruins most of the videos.
2. Clarity/resolution of videos is poor.
3. Sex scenes are usually less than 15 min each.
4. Navigation is awkward. |
Bottom Line: |
They seriously need to hire a steady-handed cameramen that doesn't shake and move around all the time if they expect this site to make much progress. Aside from the dozen cute girls on this and the companion sites, there's nothing of value here. |
|
05-30-07 01:14pm
Replies (0)
|