Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yep, too much in my opinion. I'm really not a fan, so it's sad that so many great scenes seem to have anal. Leaves slim pickings for people who don't like it.
|
10-04-13 08:54am
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Sarah Peachez reminds me in many ways of a past girlfriend, coincidentally called Sarah and who also gave great blowjobs.
|
09-27-13 11:10am
|
Reply
153
|
Immoral Live
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yep. I always star/flag my active subscriptions in my inbox so I remember to cancel. Cancelling is easy enough, but it's a bit cumbersome with the capcha codes, having to retype bits of the credit card number etc. CCBill really spoils us!
|
09-23-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
154
|
Immoral Live
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Superb review, as normal! Completely agree with your comments about their biller, too.
|
09-23-13 01:23pm
|
Reply
155
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
Only just read this, but great news about the regional billing - I don't have as much of a problem with it as some members here (despite being in the UK), but this is a great move.
|
09-22-13 12:29pm
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Three times:
Chica's Place, who very quickly resolved it*
Bryci, who didn't initially resolve, but sorted out in the end*
KT-So who never resolved
(* both these happened when I was having problems with my router, which I think meant I kept getting new IP numbers)
|
09-22-13 12:25pm
|
Reply
157
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bettercallsaul's Review
You're not the first person here to have this problem. I agree that PU shouldn't have anything to do with this site as they've ripped off several members here and would continue to do so if it weren't for warnings like yours. Definitely adding the site to my blacklist.
|
09-20-13 11:55pm
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
Black or white I guess, or maybe red. Something classic. A lot depends on the model's skin colour/skin tone where I think paler models look better in black and vice versa.
|
09-20-13 03:10am
|
Reply
159
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm not fussy at all really. Whether it's the Fame Girls teasing or Tia Ling leaving nothing to the imagination, both can be sexy in their own individual ways.
|
09-14-13 04:54am
|
Reply
160
|
Femanic
(0)
|
Reply of
Incovide's Comment
Haha brilliant, thank you for such a great overview of this site. I'm still laughing at point 8 where you explain the clear, simple, clever cancellation process.
Sounds like the site has been just chucked together with little or no regard for users. The download limit also sounds particularly annoying, and the quality of content doesn't make it sound like all the other problems are even worth the hassle.
|
09-10-13 05:22am
|
Reply
161
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Somewhat likely.
I've done this in the past with several sites, and I'll do it again at some point I'm sure, but at the moment I'm trying different sites before settling on 'the one'
|
09-10-13 03:24am
|
Reply
162
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
Wow, hope you do manage to do a review. Your experience definitely sounds different to other reviewers, so I'd definitely like to read your expanded thoughts and always think it's important things like this are reflected in the site's overall score.
|
09-08-13 12:10am
|
Reply
163
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review, sir; really good job. Completely agree with everything you've written from my time at Throated which really grew on me the longer I stayed a member and the more I explored the other sites.
|
09-07-13 08:14am
|
Reply
164
|
Kiara Mia
(0)
|
Reply of
bebelover's Review
I wish you gave more information in your review such as what sizes the images are, what way the adverts were deceiving etc. But thanks for the warning.
|
09-06-13 02:52pm
|
Reply
165
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
Good to know! Riley is bit of a new discovery for me (how I've not seen her before god only knows) - absolutely loved her at first sight, so really happy to hear she features here too. Thanks again!
|
09-05-13 01:45pm
|
Reply
166
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind them, but they're not the most sexual, sensual act a porn star can perform really. Far prefer blowjobs or even titjobs.
|
09-04-13 03:37pm
|
Reply
167
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Review
Great review, and well done on justifying the perfect score. I've definitely added the site to my shortlist now, particularly with you saying that it doesn't centre around anal content - I'm getting pretty sick of everything either being a BJ or anal with nothing in between, so it's refreshing that there's something to cater for my tastes.
|
09-01-13 08:49am
|
Reply
168
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the very kind words, much appreciated. I've been a fan of FG for a long, long time. Have always loved Sandra, Ella and Virginia, and although it's a shame Sandra and Virginia have both retired, I think Katie is a superb replacement and definitely does the 'Fame Girls spirit' justice.
It's quite pricey now, but I think that's just because of the fees CCBill charges versus other processors.
I'll definitely have a read of your review. Having been a member of both sites, this one compares very favourably apart from obviously not having such a huge archive. The videos are a brilliant addition, though.
Glad to see another PU member who understands that girls don't necessarily have to do HC content to be extremely sexy.
|
08-30-13 01:44pm
|
Reply
169
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
My Fame Girls.net review explains this, but...
Fame Girls.net (which I've reviewed) is the new site with Ella and Katie
Fame Girls (that you reviewed) is the archive site with Ella and Virgina
|
08-30-13 12:54pm
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think so, yes. When you consider the amount of time given up by webmasters and models, the equipment they need to use (cameras, lighting, computers etc), web hosting, paying for the payment processor etc etc...
I wish when sites become archive sites (eg, Karla Spice) they'd drop the membership fee, though. But generally for active websites, I think $20-30 is very good value.
|
08-29-13 10:50am
|
Reply
171
|
Lethal Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
SFguy's Comment
$174?! That's insane. Thanks for the warning, I'll make sure I add this site to my blacklist.
|
08-28-13 10:30pm
|
Reply
172
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
For me it was a coin toss between 'how they perform' and their 'body shape/size'. I voted for how they perform in the end, though, as I'm more open-minded body-wise as I like slim, nubile models to fuller, curvier (albeit not fat), whereas if they're not very good performers or good in front of the camera, then it's hard to find any enthusiasm for them.
|
08-27-13 12:52am
|
Reply
173
|
Foxes.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Comment
Has it always been like this? I seem to remember Foxes was one of the first sites I encountered when I got into porn many, many, MANY years ago - I don't recall ever joining it though, definitely not if it was a PPV site. Surely people must be insane to spent that much on four sets!
|
08-25-13 12:32am
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
For me, it's very important. The latest site I've joined, Miss CJ Miles, doesn't have zips and I don't know where to start in downloading them, particularly as it's not even a case of right-clicking the thumbnail and saving the target file.
|
08-25-13 12:30am
|
Reply
175
|
KT-So
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
Thanks, yeah, I'll probably do that. In the meantime I've joined Miss CJ Miles' site instead. It's pretty average, but she's pretty hot and a new model to me.
|
08-24-13 11:24am
|