Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Every model is gorgeous and hot as hell
- Movies are hi-res and hi-rate; new material has super hi-res DivX
- Great production values - steady cameras, good lighting, no cheesy music
- Lots of updates, as in 15 min. worth of movies every three days, and tons of photos
- Extensive back catalog
- Variety of Solo, Lesbian, Fetish, and Hardcore shoots
- Fast downloads
Cons:
- the majority of the models are bleach blondes w/ tight bodies; I'd prefer to see more brunettes and redheads with a tad more meat on them
- this is glamour porn, very serious and highly stylized; there are no 'natural' scenes, and the girls don't speak (but they moan!)
- could use a few more American models
- files are huge! which is great, of course, but you'll need another hard-drive if you want to save everything they have
- early material in the back catalog not as hi quali
Bottom Line:
This is top-of-the-line big bust porn, and probably the best European site. It's expensive, but you get your money's worth. I only wish all porn sites were this good!
Follow-Up:
6/26/2007 Aria Giovanni! A gorgeous movie + pics of the famous Penthouse Pet has just been added!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Models are all extremely hot, aggressive, domineering nymphomaniacs with ninja-like sex skills.
- The fantasy scenarios actually add to the eroticism of the scenes, with the actors staying 'in character' all the way through; good nasty fantasy fun.
- The movies are extremely clear and well filmed.
- Movies are very long (about 30 min./ 500 MB, on average)
- They update often - not on a regular schedule, but averaging once per week
- Network access
- Excellent site design
Cons:
- Many of the sets are all clean white walls with too much light, which creates a harsh and clinical effect. If they made the sets more banged-up, shady, and dirty looking, the action would feel more dirty too.
- The network has about a dozen models who appear again and again, like Daphne, Carmella Bing, Ava Devine, etc., so that they're really overexposed. As much as I like those women, it's like a breath of fresh air when they bring in a new model. Adding a few more amateurs might help.
Bottom Line:
This is an excellent value for your money, in terms of quantity and quality. When you throw in the network, it's like drinking water from a firehose; they add 1 - 1.5 MB of new videos almost every day! The only drawback is that it's a little too slick and monotonous.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Crisa: cute as hell, girl-next-door look; has perfect breasts, a gorgeous pussy, soft body, knows how to smile, seduce, move, and masturbate
- Videos are clear as a bell, high res, have good production values (no shaky camerawork or bad lighting)
- Scenes show a lot of variety, indoors, outdoors, lesbian and solo
- Updates are fairly regular
- Access to a network of other quality sites
- Exclusive content
Cons:
- nice masturbation but no hardcore
- a few videos have no sound, and Crisa doesn't talk in her movies
- good value for $25/mo, but it's not a steal
Bottom Line:
In my opinion, this is one of the most-underrated busty individual sites out there; if you find Crisa at all attractive, you'll really enjoy it. Very 'tasty'!
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- HIGH RES videos
- Models are almost all EXTREMELY BUSTY
- Large amount of LONG VIDEOS
- Steady camera action, no bad music, no bad lighting
- Good collections of PHOTOS
- Excellent value for COST
Cons:
- Some of the models have rather unattractive faces
- A few models are way too obese
- A large proportion of the models are mature (not my thing)
- Many of the models are European, sort of reserved, silent
- Attractive models with photos but no videos in some cases
- New videos only every nine days or so
Bottom Line:
There's a lot of material here, and the production values are very high. You have to pick and choose among the models; to me, there are like four unattractive ones to every sexy one. But for the money, it's worth it; no regrets about subscribing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large collection of quality BBW material, in 4 sections: (1) a 'reality' bangbros-style section of the site, with great sex-scenes; 24+ movies, 30 min. each.
(2) A BBW dvd section that actually has some top-notch material (not stale junk), and lots of it; 90+ movies, ~20 min. each.
(3) A Plompers 'magazine' section w/ great photo shoots, a mix of American and European models.
(4) A section of bbw 'extras' (mostly movies, mostly blowjobs)
Regular updates
Cons:
Some of the feature models on the reality section are not so pretty in the face (though most are sexy enough)
More of a BBW than a big breast or big ass site.
$30 a month is a bit too expensive now.
Bottom Line:
I always wanted BangBros to do a BBW site; that may not ever happen, but BBW Superstars fills that void quite nicely.
$30 seems like a bit much, but for it you're getting at least 3 sites worth of material; and as these guys are clearly committed to sticking around and growing, this will become more and more worthwhile as time passes.
The video quality on the reality site is super-duper; better than Bang Bros. And the crew of guys is less obnoxious; just a bunch of sweet, dumb bbw-lovers. (Trivia: the scenes all seem to be shot in the Las Vegas area.)
I was surprised by the BBW DVD section, since they don't really advertise it on the tour (nor does TBP mention it). The quality is a little lower than the reality material, but there's still some great stuff to be found (a redhead I've been obsessing over this week, in particular).
I'm confused by the Plompers part of the site, because it seems like a selection of European models' photosets, combined with a handful of American and British models' videos. Well, I don't get it, but I like it.
And if you save up your pennies, you will too. This is definitely in my top 3 of BBW sites.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The site's been around forever; it has an ENORMOUS collection of big-boob photos and videos, including:
1) newer, exclusive pics/vids of models, mostly British, mostly naturals, hardcore and softcore
2) complete full-length movies from the past two decades of busty porn; mostly American, mostly hardcore, lots of silicone
3) clips of busty models from the 'Golden Years' (60's -80's)
Regular, plentiful updates
Simple, effective site design
Lots of rare material I've never seen elsewher
Cons:
Video quality is medium-range at best, even for the new material; as you go back in time, the resolution gets poorer and you add in the funny lighting and sound that characterizes old-style porn
I think a number of the full-length movies - Boobarella, say - are available elsewhere in better quality.
Bottom Line:
I'm amazed that Boobcamp isn't much better known - is it because they're British? Because they don't advertise on the meta-sites? It's hard to say why.
Anyway, it definitely deserves a place on anyone's list of the top-20 big tits sites. There is so much material that you're guaranteed to find things you like, and things you've never seen before; for me the major find were some movies of Letha Weapons and Kerry Marie, and the best collection of Betty Boobs on the internet.
If you're a big fan of British busty naturals, it would be worth your while to become a regular subscriber; they offer more material than Busty Britain, for example, although the video quality is not as good.
Also, if you're dial-up, this place would be good for you, since the files average about 3 MB per minute of film. I prefer higher-res, but I got my money's worth from this subcription.
The very bottom line: if you're a boob-lover, check it out! This site's a real mine of possibilties.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Luna is a gorgeous Latina with sweet breasts, a beautiful, soft, trim little body, seductive face, great raven hair.
- An excellent collection of photos, and a decent sized video collection
- Luna knows how to dance, and in her best movies she turns on the radio and puts on some hot moves. She can do a great striptease, when she wants.
- The most recent movies are hi-res, and have good production values, good camera-work
- Webchat reveals a sweet, charming personality.
- Regular updates
Cons:
- her movies are all softcore, and a lot of them are just posing or photoshoots. She has a beautiful pussy, but the world doesn't get to see it often. Even though she can move her body great, she's still a little shy about it. The movies don't get up-close very much, either.
- the older movies in the collection tend to be short, low-res, and not as well filmed; for example there's one called "Night Slave" which would be really hot, except that it was filmed - in the dark.
Bottom Line:
If you find Luna as hot as I do, and are turned-on by softcore, you won't be disappointed.
Lots of girls can pose and look cute, but there aren't many who can move like Luna. Maybe she won't go x-rated, but it would be great if she would really let loose all the time. Dance, Luna, dance! The world needs you!
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
50+ busty and BBW models, coming in every different shape and look, some exclusive to the site, mostly American.
A very large back catalog of pics and videos, and frequent updates
Beautiful pictures, of magazine-like quality
Playful atmosphere, with a strong 'voyeur' aesthetic to its shoots, and some quasi-fetishistic themes, like boobs tied in rope.
Inexpensive, especially considering the quantity of material
Cons:
A little too formulaic: all scenes are shot at 'Juggmaster's' house, and the poses and settings frequently repeat.
Videos have good color and contrast, and are well-filmed, but are low res.
Models in movies seem to move very very slowly, and rarely talk.
All softcore; tits and full nudity but few ass or pussy shots
Most videos are 2-4 min. clips (they're excerpts from the longer dvd movies that he sells)
Site navigation is a bit counterintuitive
Bottom Line:
For big breast and BBW fans, this was a great site when it first appeared, and it still keeps 'jugging' along, updating at the same regular pace. There are a lot of familiar faces here, both old and new, like Samantha 38GG, Maria Moore and Sapphire. If you like a site like DivineBreasts.com, this is at least as good in terms of quality, with a few more 'fat girls'. I sign up for a month once every year, and am never disappointed.
I do wish Mr. Juggmaster would overhaul the site, though. First, upgrade to a higher-res camera. Second, get the models to move and talk more; put on a tune and have them dance; go to the beach; crawl on the furniture. And finally, redo the navigation in such a way that all of a model's videos and photos are visible on one page at a single glance (which is not the case now).
I wouldn't bet on any of these things happening, though; Juggmaster seems like a real creature of habit. Which has its downside... but, got to give him credit: he's Mr. Reliable, always getting new models, and rarely misses an update.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The models are all and without exception very hot.
- They now have a fairly large back catalog of material
- The movies have decent production values
- The scenes are very creative, fun, and naturalistic.
- The models look like they're enjoying themselves
- It's a good value for the money
- Bea Flora
- These Polish girls really know how to smoulder and seduce the camera!
Cons:
- Updates are very erratic - three in one week, then none for a month, say.
- Not much pussy photography. Some of the hottest models, like Kate Bona and Maria Swan, only do glamor and non-nude shoots. But Swan goes nude at Pinupfiles. WTF?
- The older movies are only available in 1-min. clips, which you have to stitch together if you want a decent movie
- They seem to have lost some of their best talent to Boobsgarden
- The members page isn't very well designed
Bottom Line:
If you've never subscribed and you like natural boobs, this is a must-get. The Bea Flora movies are the most sexy and erotic things on the entire internet, imho. After that, I would only resubscribe every eight months or so, when enough new material has built up.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Excellent selection of beautiful busty natural models, mostly Polish, with all sorts of different looks, hair color, etc.
Extensive back catalog of movies
The clips are hi-res, w/ good camerawork
Huge collection of pics, all excellent quality
Mostly softcore posing, but some hardcore sex as well
Honest, informative tour, that let's you know exactly what they have.
Cons:
Shortcomings of the movies:
- Loud annoying intro music
- Some in the 10 min. range, but many are only 3 min. long or so
- The indoor studio scenes are often harshly lit
- Models are not given much direction; for some this is not a problem, but others seem a bit clueless
The site used to update almost daily, but now only in spurts - say, nothing for two weeks, then seven sets at once
At $30 per mo. for the first month, it is too costly ($20 is more reasonable)
Bottom Line:
This was the second Polish busty natural site to appear online, after busty.pl; but there's no overlap in the roster of models except Iva Kleinova.
There are some gorgeous, cover-girl-quality models here, including the boobs.pl-exclusive blondes Sonia and Paris, and brunettes, like Laura Lion, 'Dirty Lilly' and Klenot, who have appeared elsewhere. There are also a few British models like Kerry Marie and Denise Davies, with quite a bit of material on these women. This site has the best collection of Iva Kleinova softcore videos.
Most of the clips are shot either inside a house or out on what looks like a farm. The filmers seem to have a thing for dressing-room movies and outdoorsy, riding-bikes or playing-with-the-haystack shots; it reminds me a bit of the Playboy aesthetic. But there are sex scenes as well, for a few of the models like Klenot. (In fact, I think they have Klenot's first sex scene; she is with this chiseled but clueless hunk, and they keep having trouble getting their parts to line up. It's kinda funny, like watching teenagers do it for the first time.)
The bottom line for the clips is that about half of them are pretty crappy, but when they do get their act together, the results are unique and hot as hell.
I can't say that this is a 'must subscribe' because the price is so high. But if you like enough of the models that you see on the tour (which is excellent), you shouldn't be disappointed.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Large and diverse assortment of busty natural models, mostly European
Extensive back catalog of video and pictures
The premier site for tit-sucking video; also features a good number of lactation scenes and pregnant models.
Updates are regular and relatively frequent.
The enthusiasm of the site's creator, Cel, for his models makes the site feel kinda fun.
Cons:
The videos have good resolution, but low frames per second, which is frustrating when so many of his movies focus on movement (jumping, tit shaking, etc.)
All the scenes focus obsessively on tits, to the exclusion of pussy, ass, or any other body area; and there are no masturbation or hardcore scenes.
Average video length is about 6 min. (not 12, as TBP says)
Bottom Line:
This is a site that, like Juggmaster.com and a few others, is devoted almost entirely to one man's personal obsession with tits. Apparently there aren't that many big-bust models in France, where this site is produced; so Cel, the creator, brings in models from all over, mostly from eastern Europe and Britain. Most of the models can also be found on other sites. Lorna Morgan and Kerry Marie put in a few, all-to-brief appearances; Denise Davies shows up a fair amount; and recently Anya aka Busty Merilyn did some nice scenes here. The tour is quite thorough and extensive and will give you a good idea of what the site contains.
If you really get off on tit-sucking and lactation scenes, then this would be the perfect site for you. I would have given this site a higher score if it matched my own preferences more closely. Personally I prefer a site with less of this kind of fetish material. I also like the girls to be more outgoing and aggressive; here the models are usually in fairly passive roles, being watched or suckled. Finally, I prefer hardcore or at least some pussy exploration; but you won't find that here either.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Kelly Kay herself, a British dirty-blonde w/ a very distinct look: sleepy eyes, plump, pouty lips, slightly pointy nose; soft, not-quite chubby body with beautiful big breasts, areolae, and nipples, gorgeous pussy (not much of a butt though)
Good-sized collection of videos; most are long, hi-res, well staged and ably filmed
Lots of masturbation scenes, most w/ dildos; some lesbian action.
Good price for 3 mo. subscription, and available for $18/mo. through rabbitsreviews
Cons:
A lot of the videos monotonously follow the same formula: undress, lie on bed, pose, and masturbate. The only thing that distinguishes most of them are the clothes she is wearing, and those are usually gone in a few minutes anyway!
Kelly looks hot, but she's a little slow and awkward the way she moves.
Movies have very cheesy soundtracks
Updates once a week, but last time I subscribed it was mostly pics, no more movies; in 2006 she was pregnant.
Bottom Line:
Of all the solo-model sites sponsored by Scoreland, this is one of the better ones. If you've never subscribed before, or haven't subscribed since the site was very young, it's definitely worth a month's subscription. Barring a miracle or big turnaround, it's probably as good now as it will ever be.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Has aspirations to be the British equal of Scoreland
- Videos are of high-res quality, long, and the quantity isn't bad
- pretty good production values (no shaky cameras or bad lights or bad music)
- Good variety of models, in terms of bust size, body size, hair color, etc.
- predictable updating
Cons:
- Only updates once a week
- All British girls, it seems, who don't move or talk quite as sexy as American ones do (in my view)
- not a lot of variety in the concept for the videos; so, there are like three videos of Emily Cartwright where she lays on a bed and masturbates with a dildo, that are almost indistinguishable
- not enough Kerry Marie! (only one mov)
- not a huge back catalog yet
- not that many exclusive models
Bottom Line:
A solid site, sharp and high quality but not as sexy as it could be, nor as interesting. Worth a month subscription if you've never subscribed before.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Attractive cast of naturally busty Polish girls
- Very good variety of scenes: some are posing, but most are naturalistic 'play' (shower, kitchen, bed, gym...); some solo, some lesbian rubbing.
- Updates are regular and always have video as well as photo
- Membership includes access to Korakryk.com and Malinamay.com
- Decent sized collection of content: 67 vid and photo sets at Polish B, 29 at Kora K, 40 at Malina M
- Camera work not bad
Cons:
- video res is of moderate quality; files are about 15MB per min. (a bit grainy), and movies average about 5 min. in length
- Malina does masturbation, and Kora K does masturbation and S&M, but most of the other girls like Aneta and Bea just pose
- the most recent updates are in a .mov format which for some reason I could not view on my Mac (usually I have no problem viewing any format)
- first month price of $29.95 is too steep, even if it drops to $19.95 after that.
Bottom Line:
They do good lesbian scenes here; and if you were thinking of joining Malina May or Kora Kryk, it would be a better value to join Boobsgarden instead and get three times as much content. A warning though if you are a Mac user: you may not be able to view the movies from the past few months.
I joined because I'm a Bea Flora and Aneta Buena 'completist'. Wasn't worth it just for the two of them! But if you like the other models, then it could be.
There seems to be some sort of relationship between Boobsgarden and Busty.pl, with some crossover in the models and an identical pricing structure. Are their webmasters in cahoots? Or are they sworn enemies, fighting vicious behind-the-scenes battles over the rights to Bea Flora? We may never know.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Monique: an unforgettable raven-haired BBW with absolutely enormous tits: 46P!!!
A decent video collection, for a niche amateur site, about 2hrs. worth of movies total, with an even larger photo library.
A good variety of scenes: the usual bed and shower settings, as well as a great swimming pool shot and a striptease dance. Monique can make her body move!
The scenes and shoots have a home-movie feel but they're quite well done, w/ decent camera work.
Member requests taken
Cons:
Video quality is so-so - like that of Divine Breasts - and a few movies lack sound.
Updates are sporadic and are often just photos without movies.
The Massive Mellons network that represents the bonus access is a large but crappy hodge-podge.
Bottom Line:
You can probably tell from this and other reviews that I have a thing for BBWs. If you find Monique as mind-blowing as I do, you won't be disappointed with a month's subscription to this site. It's amateurish, but Monique is clearly enjoying herself and makes everything sexy; her swimming pool video completely melts my brain. And I'm willing to bet a good sum of money that no young caucasian woman on the entire internet has larger boobs than her. If I'm wrong, let me know!
Note II: I should add that her movies come broken down into 1 min. mpeg clips. This doesn't bother me, since I just stick all the clips in a folder and then join them together using a freeware program called 'mpgtxwrap' (for Mac).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- True big breast site; all the models have humungous tits
- Variety of types: different hair color, body type, age, etc.
- Models shown in a variety of scenes, some posing, some naturalistic or outdoorsy, often having fun
- Updates are fairly regular
- Pics and videos pretty sharp
- Filemona is a really cute BBW, with great movies
Cons:
- Most of the models are 'mature', middle-aged women
- With a few exceptions, the models don't act very erotic or sexy; a lot of the clips are like home-movies from a nudist camp
- Softcore, all breasts, few below the belt shots
- Production quality on the videos not great, and they've been chopped up into a large number of clips
- Some models get the high-quality video camera (Filemona, Black Pearl), others were filmed with a lower-quality one.
- Not a huge back catalog
- Expensive
Bottom Line:
The site has potential, but there's not enough material or quality to justify the high price. If you like Sabrina Meloni or Filemona, it might be worth getting now, but otherwise I would recommend waiting a year, when they should have more material to choose from and maybe more videos with the high-quality camera.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Eva: a sexy-looking British Latina, gorgeous all over and often glamorously posed.
Has a decent number of sets (about 30) with pics and videos for each.
Some of her pictures are very hot.
Newer videos are high-res.
Network access.
Cons:
I wasn't able to watch the newer videos; they would open for a sec, then crash my player. Some of the other sites on the network had the same problem. (I have a Mac; your results may vary)
Eva is strangely reserved in her movies; she has a British 'close your eyes and think of England' look much of the time. The preview trailer for the site is misleading: all the best scenes from the movies are in it! (Like some Hollywood movies.)
Site no longer updates.
$30/mo. is too expensive.
Bottom Line:
There's really no reason to put down $30 for the Eva site, unless money is no object and you're happy with pic alones; you'd be foolish to continue it for more than a month, since it no longer updates. Some of the other sites included in the network access appear to be still active, but none of them caught my eye: a bevy of non-descript British busty amateurs, without very substantial collections of material.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Features a number of glamour shots of stunning and gorgeous busty models: Denise Milani, Lorna Morgan, Taylor Kennedy, Erica Campbell, Anya/Busty Merilyn, Maria Swan/Jana, Monica Mendez, Bianca Beauchamp, Maggie Green, Amber Campisi..
Pretty extensive photo collection of Retro busty models from the 40's to the 70's.
Pretty good production values on video.
Professional website design
Cons:
Aside from the retro material, everything on PinupFiles is scraps and leftovers from its (superior) sister site, Pinupglam. The tour makes you think that Files is the equal of Pinupglam, but it's not!
Updates only about once a week, and contemporary models' material is even more infrequent.
Video quality is low to moderate; most scenes are video taking during photo shoots; some scenes are too brightly lit or washed out by the sun.
Far too expensive at $25 per month ($20 recurring)
Bottom Line:
Pinup Files and Pinup Glam have to be considered as a single enterprise. Glam is the superior site (unless you are interested in the Retro photo collection on Files); it has 90+ videos, avg. 5 min. long, covering all their top models, and a large collection of nice 'pinup' photoshoots. And as I mentioned in the Pros, they have some of the most beautiful busty models out there, all glamorous enough to be in Playboy, all with beautiful curves.
But there are 3 big frustrating things about these sites. First, they will do a model shoot with pictures and videos. Then they will divide the pictures up into 3 sets and edit the video into 3 different shorts. And then they will dribble out the sets and the video shorts, publishing them over a long period of time - in some cases, as much as a year-and-a-half!
The second annoying thing is that Files is just a repository of scraps not available on Glam, designed to tempt the completist into spending another $25. It only has about 25 movies, which cycle through, so that they are not even all available at the same time.
Finally, they don't update very frequently, and thin everything out with their retro material.
Bottom line: if you like the models they have, and want some sexy softcore videos of them posing and stripping, a 1-month subscription to Glam wouldn't be a bad deal.
The only thing Files will really give you is a lesson in how to water down excellent material and mislead your customers!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- They have a variety of different busty and chubby models
- Updates come at regular intervals
- The models are not exclusive, but the content appears to be
Cons:
- The videos are short clips (2-5 minutes), not high res, and on some the production quality is rather low - poor lighting, or bad editing
- Too many of the models have only pics, no videos
- You don't really get any sense of who the models are; just names
- Small back catalog
- Price too high for such a marginal site
Bottom Line:
Compared to other sites in this niche - sites which feature some of the same models - this one feels like all it has to offer are 'scraps' - a few photos or a few minutes of video that another site decided not to use. So, even if in a year's time they do increase their level of content, it's not clear to me that there will be much worth looking at. It's simply not in the same league as other $20 sites.
They could improve by trying to do one thing really well: specialized in one or two models, get longer or high-quality movies, add some text or extras to the site.
Trust me on this one: there are LOTS of videos. 550+ sounds about right. And they're all original, not feeds or anything like that.
Every model who has appeared in the past few years has between one to ten fairly long, hi quality videos. That includes all the new models you see cycling through the home page. But some of the models in the complete database are from several years ago, and not all of them have videos.
Hmm... maybe they should have reserved grades 0-50 for the individual sites, and 51-100 for the multi-sites? Yes; and when you are elevated from volunteer contributor to official TBP editor, you can implement that... ;)
Good reviews of the BangBros sites. I agree w/ you on the relative merits of the individual sites. But there's something odd about the way we grade these sites. Say Assparade gets an 85, and OxPass gets an 86. Does the latter mean that Assparade gets an 85, and all the other sites put together only add 1 more point? Or is it that Assparade by itself gets an 85 when compared to other individual sites out there, while OxPass gets an 86 in relation to other multi-pass sites? But if that's the case, it still doesn't make sense, because you can't subscribe to Assparade all by itself, and so it's not really an individual site like, say, scoreland.com.
Anyway, I'm not criticizing your work, just pointing out how odd it is that multi-sites on TBP can be evaluated both collectively and individually.
Glad to be of help. You get a pretty good sense of the girls and the video quality from the tour, so that will tell you whether you'll enjoy the main part of the site. And then they don't even mention their dvd archive and other extras, which are also pretty good.
There's some pretty good Bianca Beauchamp videos on Pinupglam.com and pinupfiles.com. But two caveats: it's bikini and nude rather than fetish material; and pinupfiles is a bit of a rip-off. (I did a review of the sites today, which has further details.)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
