| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots and Lots of both videos and still pictures.
The site has been adding videos for years, back to 2004.
If you like cum shots, and cream pies, then this is the site for them.
If you like orgies and gang bangs, then this is the site for you.
Download speed is reasonable, not great, but not bad either.
Cathy has multiple sites, and one user id is good to access all of them.
Newer videos are either in WMV and MP4 format, a few older ones are MPG and MOV.
For each video avail to watch there are six options for size and format. To either watch on line or download.
Payment is via CCBill – a reliable billing service, which also means that should you want to cancel, that can also be done reliably.
User ID and Password are both your choice. Not assigned by the site. (made it much easier for me to remember)
I counted 60 different ladies who have participated in videos with Cathy. |
| Cons: |
The highest resolution videos that I could find are 1280x720 MP4; and 960x540 WMV. In today's world of 1080p on youtube, and 4k video on some sites; this low resolution is not up to current standards.
There is a daily down load limit. I think it is in the neighborhood of 50 gig, so this is not too restrictive.
If you are not a fan of inter-racial videos and sex, then you will be disappointed by the many inter-racial videos.
While there are lots and lots of cream-pie and gang-bang videos, they can begin to get repetitive after a while.
Many of the videos are old. I suspect that many are “re-mastered” old ones brought up the the MP4 sizes mentioned above.
It looks like the site is still updating, but much that is re-mastered old videos, I did not see a great deal of turely new video. |
| Bottom Line: |
Cathy is a 40-ish fizzy haired blonde from Austrailia, who runs her site from the US. She seems to have a fairly insatiable appetite for multiple cocks and orgies. She is also very bi. Hard core sex, lots of gang-bangs.
If these “fetishes” of cream-pies, inter-racial, or gang-bangs are what turns you on, (as I will admit some of these do for me) then this site is worth a month or two of your viewing pleasure. There are a huge number of scenes of cream-pies. There are some “clean-ups”, another woman licking a creamy cock or a juicy pie, but most pies just drip.
Would I sign up for this site for a long time. No. But is it worth the approximately $15 for at least one month, and maybe a 2nd month at about $10. Yes. If cream-pies, orgies, gang-bangs, and multiple partners interests you. |
|
09-12-17 01:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
27
|
CreamPie.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Very informative review, thanks for going into sufficient detail that one can really use the information.
|
12-06-12 04:20pm
|
Reply
28
|
Czech VR
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for your comment
|
05-06-20 03:16pm
|
Review
29
|
Czech VR
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
These people understand Virtual Reality - and use it to advantage.
As of the end of April 2020 there are 763 videos available on the site.
VR videos are available for download in multiple formats - details below.
Users may choose a download based on their location. Europe / Asia / North America.
Videos are 3D - 180 degree actual VR - not just a 180 degree “flat” video.
Navigation is fairly easy with selection options.
I made Payment through Epoch. They also offer Verotel and CCBill. |
| Cons: |
When using selection options only One Tag may be used at a time - and it is hard to clear tags.
Occasionally the actress gets so close to the camera that it becomes (at least with my old eyes) hard to maintain focus. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the third Virtual Reality porn site that I have subscribed to since buying my Oculus Rift S VR device. And I believe that this one DOES THE BEST JOB SO FAR OF USING THE FULL POTENTIAL OF VIRTUAL REALITY to present an experience where one actually feels “INSIDE” the scene. Particularly in the “POV” videos it really feels as if the lady in the video is talking / interacting directly with the viewer.
Most videos are in “side by side”, 180 degree format (at least the ones I saw for the Oculus). There are a couple videos in 360 degree format, although they did some interesting editing here which I did not like, looking forward one looks at the girls face and boobs, looking backwards one gets a forwards view of her pussy.
Formats:
- Oculus / Vive / Valve Index (High: 5400x1920 60fps H.265) (Medium 3840x1920 60fps H.264)
- Gear vr / Daydream / Oculus Go ( (High: 5400x1920 60fps H.265) (Medium 3840x1920 60fps H.264) (Low 2880x1440 60 fps H.264)
- Playstation VR (High 2880x1440 60 fps H.264)
- Smartphone (High 2160x1080 60fps) (Low 1920x960 30fps)
Some older videos (2017) do not have the highest quality - but are still very good.
Video download sized is highly dependent upon which format above that you choose. I happen to download the largest format files, and they can be quite big (the biggest I downloaded was 15GB. While the smallest was 1.2GB (but this was an older vid in a smaller format). I would say most recent videos are 4GB or larger.
While in theory I have about 100Mbps download speed - my average download speed was closer to 25Mbps. Still pretty good, but not as great as it could have been.
The three downloado regions (Europe / Asia / North America) are actually served from the following locations: Prague / Los Angeles / Chicago.
Of the four “sites” each has a somewhat different focus.
“Czech VR” (344 videos) is mostly POV videos with one or two ladies focusing on a male, and engaged in pretty standard hard core porn.
“Czech Fetish” (240 videos) is a real mixture of multiple fetish videos. My favorite is the pissing videos, and here is where, IMHO, this site really shines. They have done an excellent job of showing closeups of pissing, in some cases the pee comes right at the camera, such that except for not getting a wet face you really feel as if she is pissing directly in your face. There are also fetishes such as Fisting, Domination, Gaping, Latex, Nylon stockings, Feet - foot fetish, Anal Gaping, Milking, JOI (I’d never heard of this particular fetish, I think it means Jerk-off instructions, where the girl talks and teases you about jerking off to her fine attributes), Lingerie, Spanking, etc, etc, etc.
“Czech Casting” (172 videos) is what the name implies, interviews first with the girl and then action of one type or another. If the girl does not speak English there is usually an off camera female who is translating from the girl’s native tongue into English, this slows things down, but at least we get to have some sense of the young lady. One other thing they do is have her write her name on a big sheet of paper and answer Yes or No to some acts she is willing to perform. These include:
Hardcore, Anal, Lesbian, Fisting, Pissing, Foot Fetish. The VR effect in these videos isn’t quite as strong because the girl is focused on answering questions as she sits on a couch rather than talking to the camera / viewer. But once the Q&A part is done, then the VR improves.
“VR Intamacy” (12 videos) This appears to be where Solo close up videos are placed by the network, there are so few it seems to me that its hardly worth having, but I don’t run that railroad. The scenes are quite good though.
Not a great deal of cultural diversity in the models (didn’t bother me too much, but if one wants African American or Latina models this is not the site to choose) as most models are Eastern European) It is a Czech Site after all.
In most of the videos of this network/site there are some fantastic closeups, an area where VR really excels. Although occasionally the closeups are so close that I started to see double because I could not focus quite as close as the girl was to the camera.
I can not comment on site support as I had no need to contact them, everything seemed straight forward and usable.
I can not comment on one’s ability to cancel a subscription as I am still a member of this site.
. |
|
05-03-20 03:35pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
30
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Billing is via CCBill.
I counted 487 individual girls listed, a few of them have 2 or 3 scenes, but most only one scene.
For each girl there is a short biography / description of the scene.
For each girl there are 8 to 10 large thumb-nail pictures to give an idea of what will be in the video.
Most of the girls are quite attractive.
The photos are downloaded in Zip files.
Mostly first time models.
Download manger worked (until Firefox updated and then disallowed DTA). |
| Cons: |
The largest video format (MP4) is 1280x720, and older videos are 640x360 in WMV format.
The photos are usually just clips from the video, and are small.
The format of the videos gets repetitive.
There is only one male who is in all of the scenes.
Not a very advanced web design. |
| Bottom Line: |
Most of the females on this site are in the age range of 18 to 21, with a few going up into their mid 20s. And many of them are small breasted, girls who are short and light weight. If this is the demographic that you like, then this is a great site to see these girls. Most of the girls are ethnically white, with a few Latinas and a few African Americans.
The man who is the male talent does a good job of focusing on the girl, his goal is to make her the real star of the show.
The format of almost all videos is an introduction section where we get to know a bit about the girl, what she likes, what her sexual experience is like, and what she likes to do. Many scenes start with the girl being picked up in the car at the airport, and often giving road head and they drive to a motel room for the video filming. We often see the girl applying make up, and changing clothes. Then some time sitting on the bed showing her boobs. The scenes usually proceed to a the male using a dildo or vibrator to get the girl off, often a BJ is next, and finally full sex in multiple positions. There is a mix of “money shots”: the guy jacking off on her face, the girl jacking him on her face or in her mouth, and some of them end with cream pies.
I think for me what I like best is that the models appear to be real first timers who either want to get into the porn business, or more likely are doing this for some extra cash. We get to see young, pretty, semi-innocent girls, and we get to know them a bit.
I could not decide if this is a pro or a con, but many of the videos are quite long in the 45 minute and over range. With many of the girls this is a plus, but sometimes it gets a bit slow and I wanted to skip ahead.
The male talent always has his face hidden and out of focus, but for me that was quite ok, as I am watching this for the lovely young ladies.
He usually has three cameras going at all times, two are fixed on tripods to get a bit longer view, and one is for POV and close ups. At time the girl will hold one camera.
Four linked (bonus) sites are included with this site, but can only be accessed through ExCoGi via a link. The sites are:
Backroom Casting Couch
Black Ambush
Net Video Girls
Casting Couch HD.
This site assigns a random letter/number user ID and Password at sign up time, be sure you save this as it is difficult to remember and you must use the assigned values, you can not change them. The sign in screen also requires that you enter an “I'm a real person” string of numbers each time you sign in.
If a site with this format, young innocent college girls doing their first porno, interests you, as it does me. Then I can recommend this quite highly. I even renewed my membership for a 2nd month, something I seldom do. |
|
12-21-17 03:07pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
31
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This pretty much echos my thoughts on FTV. I had a membership about 2 years ago, and found some very nice videos, etc, but felt that there was just too much repetition of the scenes and I lost interest. It's too bad, because at first I was really enthusiastic about the site. Don't think I would spend the $ to "re-up" unless there was a significant discount. But it might be fun to take one more look, I will have to give it some thought.
|
12-04-12 11:46pm
|
Reply
32
|
Kissak
(0)
|
Reply of
rocz's Review
Thanks for the warning. This is one of the reasons one comes to Porn Users. Not just to find good sites, but also to be "warned away" from bad ones.
|
11-03-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
33
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Met-Art is on my list of sites to try someday. I just can't try all sites at one time. So many good sites, so little time to really enjoy.
Anyway, my thoughts go to your suggestions for a photo naming convention. I fully agree that the model's name should be the first part of the photo name! Then some intermediate data, your suggestion of the date is excellent, or possibly a short description of the set, and finally ending with a photo number within the set.
Now if only more sites would use a longer name, or a convention like this, rather than renumbering all photos to 001, 002, 003, etc within each downloaded, system generated zip file.
|
11-04-12 12:11am
|
Review
34
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- She is cute.
- Videos avail in at least 720p (h264 or wmv)
- Photo sets download in Zip files
- Updates about 1 or 2 times per week.
- Navigation & Use of web site is easy. |
| Cons: |
- SHE is cute - the operative word is SHE, this site is based on one young lady only.
- Updates, appear to always be a set of photos as a “movie teaser” followed by a video. Thus maybe 2 updates per week.
- not much variety here. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the “bonus” site which one receives with a subscription to Young Legal Porn. Both of these sites are controlled via Dieselaccess.com. Their advertising suggests that the longer one keeps re-subscribing, the more bonus sites that will be added, I have not been a member long enough for that to happen, and following my usual pattern I am dropping my subscription after only one month. Nothing wrong with the two sites, but I just want to move on.
As of Nov 2012 there were 77 videos available on this site, all featuring Gloria, a cute and quite skinny young lady. Most vids are Solo, Striptease. There are 87 photo sets, also of Gloria. A few videos were lesbian, and I found one photo set with Gloria and a man.
The site also links to the same live shows that one can access from Young Legal Porn. While they are live shows, I found the video of the shows to be very small, and difficult to see.
Billing for this (as for Young Legal Porn) is through CCBill, and as I have found with other sites using CCBill, signup and cancellation proved easy.
Diesel Access provides you with a password of their choice at signup, 16 random characters and numbers, so you must save the email or password somewhere, as it is virtually impossible to memorize. This does provide good security, but is difficult to remember if you don’t let your pc remember passwords for you. There has been discussion of this topic in the Porn Users Forum.
Over all thoughts and score: As a bonus site, this is worth looking at for a day or so, but that is the end of it. As a stand alone site, I wouldn’t find it worth the price of admission. There is just too little content here to make it valuable. I am giving it a 60 because it is technically good. The lack of variety and content cause it to get a low score. |
|
11-13-12 02:43am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
35
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Review
Nice review John. Got the point across with out being too wordy.
I think, though, that I must agree with Elephant, in that I too enjoy seeing girl-girl pee. Don't ask why, everyone's personal selection of why they like one genre of porn is different. Multiple girls pissing is just something that I would like to see. I would really like it if instead of just 2 girls, they had scenes of 3 or 5 or 10 girls all peeing together and on each other...
Are there any "associated sites" that are included or does one only get VIPissy? I see they are part of the Epoch network, and just wondered if there are any "bonus" sites included in the price of admission.
|
01-06-14 02:52am
|
Review
36
|
Virtual Pee
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One (short about a minute or two) free video before you sign up to test compatibility of your VR set up with their videos.
Multiple download formats for different VR equipments
Almost all videos are of solo female pissing
Site navigation is fairly easy
Help Desk is very responsive
New videos weekly |
| Cons: |
Video length is inconsistent
Videos do not play in all Oculus VR players
Almost all videos are of solo female pissing
Many short videos that offer little to the imagination, nothing new to excite the viewer
Check for pre-checked addons at sign up time - be sure to “uncheck”
The girls do not interact with the camera (the viewer), I suspect that most do not speak English, I think this is a Czech site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This review feels harder for me, because I so very much wanted the site to be a favorite and to give a great review. Yet here I am offering a review of a site that fell short of my hopes in most respects. Maybe this is partly because this site is created and managed by the same folks who run VIPISSY.COM, a site which I have subscribed to and liked for the last few years. Virtual Pee is not up to the VIPissy standards.
Shortly after I first signed up for the site I managed to muck up my password and had to send an email to the sites support staff (support@puffysupport.com ) who were very helpful in providing me with an accurate version of my account name and password. (yes they do have access to user passwords, but in this case I was happy that they did.) Their response was timely and helpful.
Vendor support is through Vend-O.com. (I had no problem canceling my subscription, although I found it unusual that canceling had to be done at the Vend-o.com site and not directly on the VirtualPee.com site).
I realize that “PEE” sites are a small niche within the overall porn community, it just so happens that I like this niche. While some of the videos do give a good view of female pissing, none of them do a fantastic job. I would very much have like more close ups. I would have liked the ladies to interact more with the camera as if it really were someone close watching her pee. That is what Virtual Reality is best at, making the user feel that they are in the scene. Yet these videos were shot at a distance and in a way that it just looked like any other porn video. I could not help feeling that the VIPissy site, from the same company, offers better videos even though they are not VR. I much prefer watching female pee videos, but do like the lesbian pee and pee sharing at VIPissy, and that sometimes the girls there are with males. There are no males, and very few lesbians at VirtualPee.
As of the end of March 2020 the site had 63 models who are seen in 109 videos. This isn’t a great number, but enough to make it worth checking out if pee videos are a genre that you like. Just realize that if you’ve gotten used to VIPissy or WetandPissy dot com, this will not be up to those standards.
I use an Oculus Rift S as my VR headset. My prefered software for watching videos on this is
DEO VR, I found that the videos from VirtualPee do not play well in this software. I just can not get anything that I feel at all comfortable watching. I downloaded and used the SKYBOX VR player to view the videos from VirtualPee. The videos do work in this player, but I felt that the quality of the video was not as good as I had hoped. I do not know if this lack of quality (sharpness of the video) is due to the downloaded video from VirtualPee or if it is due to using a different player. In either case I was not happy with the quality of the videos when compared to a previous VR site that I reviewed. |
|
03-27-20 04:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
37
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I am deeply saddened that your results with Wet and Pissy, were not as good as mine with Wet and Puffy. I had tried my best, it was my first review, to be as accurate as I could at the time that I wrote my review. I had joined Wet and Puffy, and was able to access all three of their sites. Yes, I did have to sign into each one separately, if I remember correctly, but I did access all three, and was happy with my results.
I see that after 7 comments you were able to resolve your issues with the web host and it appears that things have been worked out. That is good, and I hope long term that you are not upset with my having given what I believed then, and still believe was my honest opinion of the Wet and Puffy site.
|
12-19-12 08:33pm
|
Reply
38
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Review
About the related sites:
wetandpissy.com
and
weliketosuck.com
I was able to access each of them. I needed to re-key my user id and password for each site, but both did let me access them. I downloaded video from each of them, but found the weliketosuck less interesting than the wet and pissy. Of course that is based on my interests and desire to see pee videos. I found the sucking ones just somewhat boring.
This comment added 3 weeks after I signed up for Wet and Puffy . . . I have since downloaded many videos from both wet and puffy and wet and pissy. I have canceled re-bills, as I have as many videos as I found interesting downloaded, and see no need to continue to pay for the few additional that may be added over the course of a month, although I may come back in a year or so for more.
Overall, it was a good site (sites) for pissing videos, which is what I wanted. I realizethat this is a niche market, and that I fall into that small group who want to see peeing, but for us it is good clear pee video with lots of close ups. For others, it would certainly be a waste of hard earned money.
|
09-10-12 08:40pm
|
Reply
39
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks for your comments. Yes pissing is certainly a small niche market, but between the "wet and puffy" and their related "wet and pissy" site, you will see a bunch of it here. There is some of the drinking and pouring you mentioned, not in all cases, but maybe 10 to 20 % of the videos do include those things. What I like are the clear closeups of pissing, some with lips spread wide so you can really see it streaming (steaming) out.
And I also agree with you on the big taco and juicy cherry stuff. Maybe because SWMBO has a peachy pussy.
It certainly is mostly a solo site, there are a few lesbian vids, and even a few where a guy is in there, but these (from what I have seen) are few and far between.
|
08-31-12 04:35pm
|
Reply
40
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Ya know, I'm new at reviewing sites, at least at writing down my reviews. Been reviewing in my head for ages. I will try to watch for internal inconsistencies like this more carefully in the future. I agree "many" would probably have been a better choice of words.
Anyway I was more interested in the pissing than the toys. Have always liked watching girls pee. Don't know why, and have long since given up on trying to figure it out.
Thanks for your comments, I will try to improve my internal consistancies.
|
08-26-12 02:13pm
|
Review
41
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Provides what it advertises.
- Video download formats: FLV, MP4, WMV, MP4-HQ
- Video download example: 17'46": FLV 301mb 720x406, MP4 225mb, WMV 806mb 1280x720, MP4-HQ 1035mb 1920x1080.
- Picture downloads - ZIP file. Usually two sizes 1027x769 or 2800x1867, but sizes do vary.
- Crisp clear images and videos
- Statistics 418 Models, 540 scenes, 547 videos, 28458 pictures
- Natural breasts - many are A or B cup.
- Non-Member intro shows a full face picture (topless with small pussy insert) of each model.
- Trusted billing - CCBill or Epoch.
- Appears to update 3 times per week. |
| Cons: |
- All videos seem to follow same theme: Musical background, model strips, model plays with pussy, may use toys
- Sort by Newest or "most popular", Select by All or "pussy type", most videos have tags but one can not select or sort by tags
- Older videos are 640x480 WMV
- Some of the Girls seem uninterested
- Interview section is very says almost nothing, and is text not video/audio.
- There is a tab on most pages for "CAMS" but it is a dead link. |
| Bottom Line: |
Good clear images and videos. Lots of closeups.
Most models are Eastern European. Of the 24 most recent updates the Country of Origins are: England 1, Czech Republic 10, USA 1, Poland 2, Hungary 2, Romania 1, Austrira 2, France 2, Netherlands 1, Switzerland 1, Greece 1. Models appear to be in the 18 to 25 year age range.
Lots of Dildo play. Many Pussy pumps, I suspect this may be why its "puffy". Most girls either use a lotion or spit on their fingers, this must be the "wet" part of the name.
There are a number of videos of the girls pissing. For fans of this, like me, it will be a turn on, as these are often closeups.
This is part of a three site network consisting of: WetandPuffy.com, WeLikeToSuck.com, WetandPissy.com
Works well with Free Download Manager.
Lower price for linking from PornUsers.com is 19.95 USD, normal advertised price is 29.95/mth.
This is my first review - please provide constructive criticism and I will do my best to improve. |
|
08-26-12 05:43am
Replies (15)
|
Reply
42
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks to both Slutty & Lk2fireone for your comments and especially for the suggestion of the DownThenAll download manager. I have tried it, and well, lo and behold it appears to work. :)
It did mean a need to switch from using Chrome to Firefox but that was not a very big deal, as I often use both of them anyway.
I appreciate very much that I got good advice here on that. Again, to me that is what a site like this is, or at least should be, all about. Users assisting other users.
Fizzy
|
11-06-12 10:39am
|
Review
43
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Very high quality video and photos - extremely clear.
- Most recent videos (2012) are 1080p, either h264 or WMV format.
- Videos also avail in sd480 and ld360 format
- Variety: Solo, Boy-Girl, Girl-Girl
- Daily updates - usually both video and photo set, although occasionally only one or the other.
- Fairly fast downloads (this depends so much on your ISP that I can only say it felt fast to me.)
- Very cute girls
- Search by “topic”, for example - 69, Bathroom, Dildo, Hardcore, Small Tits, allows selection of multiple criteria.
- Photo sets download in zip files. |
| Cons: |
- I could not get download to work with Free Download Manager.
- Vids have advertisement, short but annoying, for another site.
- Older content, as one might expect, is lower quality / resolution.
- The “ratings” tabs at very top of screen are confusing.
- Photo sets in zipfiles all have the same file names. 001.jpg, 002.jpg, etc. |
| Bottom Line: |
Where to begin? The girls are lovely, beautiful, young! The name of the site is a clear indication of what you may expect. A quick review of the model list shows virtually all are 18 or 19 years old, and European.
In those videos where it is a “boy/girl” scene, even some of the boys are very cute, although I don’t usually focus on the guys, the ones here are worth watching.
Statistics:
- I counted 12 videos listed in a single screen, with the ability to step through 91 screen loads, so that would be about 1092 videos available.
- "The Girls" section had 21 models listed per page, and 17 pages, so about 147 models.
- Photo galleries were 12 per page, and 106 pages so that's about 1272 photo sets or galleries.
I like to save the photo sets in a single directory after downloading, since each file set re-uses the file names of 001, 002, 003 etc within each set, it is an extra bother to have to batch rename each set so that I can store multiple sets in a single directory. I have seen this type of naming at other sites as well, and it may discourage photo set downloads. I would prefer a naming convention of “girls-name, shoot-id, then photo number. For example Karen-02-001.Jpg. But every site has their own methods, this is just a pet peeve of mine.
Another reviewer commented on the relative scarcity of anal sex, and listed this as a negative, it may well be for some viewers, but for others of us this is a positive. Therefore I have listed it in my comments section, as I believe such things are much more in the eyes, or should I say fantasies, of the beholder, rather than attributes of the site. I personally prefer less anal action and more “pussy”.
This site also has live shows, which are clearly scheduled and easy to access. However the video that goes with the live shows if SMALL. If you enjoy the banter and chat, with a number of other guys and the one lady, then you may like this. I found it less than exciting.
I don’t have a very objective scoring system for sites, maybe someone else can suggest a consistent scheme for scoring, so I am going to give this site a good rating simply because I like the videos and found the site fairly easy to navigate. The only real problem that I have had has been the inability to use FDM to control my downloads. BTW it seems to work, but then downloads a very short video that says I am not authorized to download.
The site lists one "bonus site", which contains one girl. There are comments to the effect that the longer you keep your membership, the more bonus sites you will get, but at this point I don't have the benefit of this feature. And if the other sites are like the one bonus that one gets initially, it may not be of particular benefit.
Billing for this site is through CCBill.
Bottom line: The site holds my attention with high quality videos and photo sets. I can let my mind wander, enjoy the beauty of the models, daydream myself into being with them, enjoy a long slow porn watching session. What more could an old guy expect from any site with lovely young ladies. |
|
11-03-12 05:50pm
Replies (5)
|
|
