| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not on my desktop, but I have a favorites folder on each of my external hard drives, and also have some that have piled up on my laptop in the video folder. I try to keep those migrated over to the hard drives, but get behind when I'm busy.
|
02-22-13 07:45pm
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Captchas are quite annoying. I have gotten used to the impossible to memorize random logins and PWs--better to have that than poor site security.
|
02-20-13 10:39am
|
Reply
103
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I was wondering the same thing, as I am probably going to join Young Legal Porn very soon. Where are u Dieselman?
|
02-19-13 10:13pm
|
Reply
104
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Oh that is sweet music to my ears! ALS for $10! I might have to put off joining the Diesel sites for another month. Decisions, decisions.
|
02-19-13 10:10pm
|
Reply
105
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RedRoger's Comment
Thanks for the heads up RedRoger. I don't usually do short term trials, since lately more and more sites seem to be pulling crap like this. I hope this tactic backfires on them.
|
02-18-13 06:42am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
I guess some use this device in lieu of a computer, but since I have a laptop thats how I surf and stream porn. I stream Netflix movies through my Blue Ray player and also download them to my computers.
|
02-18-13 06:31am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
ummmm, what?
|
02-16-13 10:28am
|
Reply
108
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Great review lk2fireone! I really do wish they would completely rethink their approach to the videos. You are correct in saying that its a wasted opportunity. Maybe they could try to fill the slow sexy striptease niche--something that's almost entirely absent out there in porn land. I've been a satisfied $99 a year member for going on 3 years. At 8 bucks and change for a month it almost feels like stealing.
|
02-14-13 02:57pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Just here for me. I've also noticed that the general level of civility on online forums is in the stone ages. Not so here.
|
02-14-13 02:50pm
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Wouldn't even think about it!
|
02-12-13 10:27am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
2 terabytes and growing!
|
02-10-13 10:20pm
|
Reply
112
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
MPL STUDIOS's Reply
I think Skippy's gonna like the site. I know I did.
Oh, I just read the last part. Maybe you could have asked him if he wanted to cancel?
Hey mon, take da frowns and turn dem upside down!
|
02-08-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
113
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Over the last year or so, I have made a point of writing down my subscription ID number, user name, and password immediately after signing up for a site. I keep these all in the same little notebook. They come in very handy when you go to log in, and when you go to cancel.
I hate the random usernames and passwords too, but I just view it as a necessary evil to deal with. Some of them are so bad I can never memorize them.
MPL is one of those sites that seems to be overly concerned with people trying to download their entire site. They have a list of rules right on the home page that seems just a bit over the top to me. However, I am very selective about what I download, and I don't use a download manager, so I never ran into any problems at their site. Having said that, I did notice more than once that after being on their site for about an hour or so, the back button on my browser didn't work anymore. I wasn't sure if this was problem with the browser or their way of trying to throttle me. It didn't work, as there were buttons at the bottom of each photo page to go back to the gallery. I think I had the same issue at another site, so I wasn't sure what the problem was. I doubt if your lockout originated from CCBill--you probably violated one of MPL's rules without knowing it.
|
02-08-13 06:09am
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I think about sex and porn fairly often--which is to say numerous times throughout the day. I used to think I might be abnormal in this regard, but over the years I've talked with a few of my friends about the topic, and we all seem to agree that men think about sex/naked women/porn quite a bit.
|
02-08-13 05:29am
|
Reply
115
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Well in fairness to the site, it is named Goddess Nudes, not Goddesses Stripping. They have a lot more clothes here than they do at Domai. And not every set is outdoors. Two of my favs (Macy B and Chantelle--their Met-Art names), had 5 sets between them, all indoors. I found a couple of new girls here for my favs folder, but I can't pull up anything else on them in the model indexes. I certainly got my $5 worth!
|
02-07-13 04:35pm
|
Review
116
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
--Lots of very beautiful girls here! Updates 5 days a week (one set each day; works out to 260 sets per year, total of about 870 sets at this time).
--Exclusive content as far as I can tell, except for just a few photo sets
--most recent pics are in the 4000 to 6000 pixel range (long dimension of print size sets). There are 2 resolutions (screen size and print size).
--all sets have zips, and I get good download speeds. No excessively large zip files here!
--generally good photography
--first month price is only $4.95 (rebills at 9.95) |
| Cons: |
--Primarily a photo site (I only found 2 videos)
--The navigation has a number of issues, and could be improved in that regard (see below).
--No search feature or search tags here at all. You have a chronological index and an alphabetical index.
--Too many outdoor sets for my taste. Also, roughly 50% are all nude sets (no clothes to strip out of).
--Occasional photo sets have poor focus (I thought it might be poor quality scanning from slides, but the webmaster told me they are not scans).
--The first 26 galleries from 2009 don't have galleries that can be viewed on the website--they only have zip files to download. Shouldn't be that much work to fix.
--The site is advertised as the more explicit alternative to the parent site (Domai.com), but there are still some sets that aren't very explicit. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a member at Domai.com about 4 years ago, and came accross Goddess Nudes recently when searching the model indexes for some of my favorite models. Several of my favs had sets there, and when I saw the price was 4.95 for the first month, it was a no-brainer to join. Goddess Nudes is run by the same guy who operates Domai.com. I remembered Domai as having not very explicit photo sets, that were mostly all nude and mostly outdoors. Goddess Nudes is advertised as a similar site to Domai, but with more explicit photos.
Once I joined, a quick perusal of several photo sets showed that was true, but I have since come accross a number of sets that disappoint me in that regard. My ideal solo girl photo/video site would have a good variety of poses in every photo set, to include several spread leg and pussy close up photos in every one. You get that in some, but not all, of the sets here.
The models here are generally very beautiful eastern European girls in the 18 to 25 age range. There are quite a few that I have not seen anywhere else. There are some popular European models here, but perhaps fewer than at other sites. For some reason very few of these girls are listed at my favorite model index.
I remembered Domai as having almost exclusively outdoor sets, and that appears to be the case here as well. I'd like to see more indoor sets, especially some in nice luxurious beds.
Roughly 50% of the sets here start with the girl having some clothes on (I didn't really do any counts of this, so I may be off a little). The other 50% or so are all nude. There is not much slow seductive stripping, although that is something that is hard to do properly with photo sets (much easier and better with video). Many of the clothed sets start with the girl in bra and panties.
I found some occasional photo sets with poor focus. Most of the newer sets are very good, but overall this site falls short of other top photo sites like Met-Art, Femjoy, and MPL Studios in the quality department.
The site is set up almost identically to Domai, which is to say, it has some navigation issues. When you log into the home page, there are currently about 3 and half months worth of photo sets on the main page (roughly 75 sets). Each set has a large thumbnail on the left side of the browser window. Only the left side of the browser window is used, so the end result is that the page is at least 4 times longer (top to bottom) than it could be if there were 4 thumbnails going accross the page. OK, not such a big deal you might say. But when you click into a photo set, and then back out of it, it takes you back to the top of the home page. You then have to scroll all the way down back to where you were (while trying to not get distracted on the way). This also happens on many (but not all) of the yearly index and alphabetical index pages as well. I know there is a way to code in html that takes you back to where you were on the previous page, but that is not done consistently here.
You might think with 260 photo sets a year, each yearly index page would have links to sub-pages for each month. Nope, you get the same extemely long (top to bottom) page that includes all sets for that year. You might also think once you were in a given photo set, that you could click on a link to show all of that model's photo sets. Nope, you have to go back to home page (which sometimes prompts you to log in again), and get there via the alphabetical index (which again often involves lots of scrolling).
These are not huge issues--you can still find you what need, and with 870 photo sets, the site isn't so large that these issues would be a deal breaker (though I hope Domai isn't still like this). Still, it doesn't seem like it would take that much work to come up with a better design.
All complaining aside, the bottom line is the bottom line. This site only costs $4.95 for the first month, and for me that was a great deal. I got a good number of zip files of some gorgeous girls, including several of my favs. Definitely worth checking out! |
|
02-06-13 09:26pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
My love of beautiful women with hot bodies will die when I do.
|
02-06-13 09:50am
|
Reply
118
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Dieselman, I was checking out the free tour at Young Legal Porn, and couldn't find a list of all the Diesel sites. Is there one gateway page?
|
02-04-13 05:10pm
|
Reply
119
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for that excellent break down. I'll probably go with Young Legal Porn--looks like a great site!
|
02-04-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
120
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Yes, great review lk2fireone. It's hard to figure out which Diesel site to join first. Any advice?
|
02-03-13 11:25am
|
Reply
121
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
pornstacker's Review
Thanks for the review and welcome to Porn Users. I checked out the free tour, and even though I'm not into fantasy games, this site looks interesting. Pornstacker, about how many different girls do they have here? Also, it seems like they incorporate an online game here-is that right? Are there different levels, with different maidens that get "unlocked" as you move on?
|
02-03-13 11:21am
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Its nice as a prelude to the good stuff.
|
02-02-13 09:51am
|
Reply
123
|
Microminimus
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Your review sums up my thoughts pretty well RearAdmiral. I joined this site a couple weeks ago, after seeing a gallery on Met-Art where the girl was wearing a wicked weasel. I've been aware of Wicked Weasel for over 10 years, but it had been quite a while since I had been to the site. I kinda got fooled into thinking it was a more traditional porn site by the limited free tour, only to find out that there are no zips once I joined. I like the site more than you do, but thats just cause I love hot babes in hot bikinis. The best stuff is in the model archives, and you can also find the hottest girls in the most popular galleries link. I've found a few that I really like, but like you mentioned, its a lot of work to download a gallery. BTW, the membership does not rebill automatically, so you don't have to worry about canceling.
|
02-01-13 04:39pm
|
Reply
124
|
Pure 18
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Nice review Elephant! One question: Are there any photos here or just vids? Thanks
|
02-01-13 10:45am
|
Reply
125
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Excellent review! I wonder if Suze will follow Holly's lead, and let Met-Art take over management of the site. Check a little down in the comments for the link about Met-Art managing Holly's site.
|
01-31-13 08:29pm
|
|
