| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
I agree that this should have an introductory price until it grows. $25 USD is a lot for 18 videos. But... it also has a lot of models I really like. A fool and his money are soon parted. I suspect I'll take the plunge soon.
|
01-20-19 02:30pm
|
Reply
302
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Nope...
|
01-19-19 11:18am
|
Reply
303
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I think it's time I rejoined that network. That network is among my favourites and one I join several times per year. Thanks for the reminder.
|
01-19-19 06:42am
|
Reply
304
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
My guess is that they found one that charges less. But the strange thing is that you'd think that a biller that needs staff to deal with every membership issue would charge more. I often tell myself that someday I'm only going to subscribe to sites with the few billers I trust but I just can't bring myself to do that. Though I have started using pre-paid cards with billers I don't know or don't trust.
|
01-19-19 06:41am
|
Comment
305
|
Blacked Raw
(0)
|
|
01-16-19 10:25am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
306
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
|
|
01-16-19 10:24am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
307
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
|
01-16-19 10:24am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
308
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
I agree with you that NVG has really improved over the past few years. When I first joined this network maybe four or five years ago it was my least favourite site there. But my opinion of it has changed pretty much based on the same reasons that you note in your review.
|
01-16-19 09:55am
|
Reply
309
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Thanks for posting this. I've never heard of the site but it looks great, even though as you say it's a lot like Wow Girls. I've recently cancelled a membership with the same biller listed for this site (Vendo) and I had no issues so I think I'll take the plunge on this.
|
01-13-19 05:27pm
|
Review
310
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 13 videos
- Updates weekly
- A-list models
- Exclusive scenes
- All anal
- Six download resolutions
- Photos (singles and zipped)
- Streaming (no resolution options)
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds |
| Cons: |
- Small site
- Odd quirks
- Not particularly raw
- Expensive |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site because I like Greg Lansky’s work and because the site is 100% anal. The site follows the same model as Lansky’s other ‘Raw’ site, Blacked Raw. While the regular Tushy site features more ‘glamourous’ scenes featuring anal sex, Tushy Raw aims to give the viewer a more ‘raw’ view at that. In my opinion, however, the site doesn’t really deliver on its promise.
‘Raw’ in the context of this site and it’s sister site Blacked Raw, doesn’t actually have rawer sex. The rawness is derived from the scenes all being shot at night using stark lighting so that the model is the primary focus with everything else being dark. Perhaps the oddest choice in the scenes is an attempt to remove the male talent as much as possible. It’s rare that we see the male talent’s face but what’s really odd is that the male is dressed in a black (or purple, it’s hard to tell with the lighting) skintight lycra or nylon long-sleeved pullover shirt and pants of the same material. The only modification is that there is a hole cut in the front of the pants so the male talent can get his dick out, which is a good thing considering that this is a porn site.
The scenes have little setup, We get some shots of the model in a large city at night then the scene moves into a dimly lit apartment and the sex begins almost immediately. Most, and maybe all, of the scenes start with the model having a buttplug in. There is usually some oral on the male but none on the female. I presume this is in keeping with the intent to keep the male’s face out of the frame. The sex is conventional but it is all anal. Most scenes have some ass-to-mouth and most end with a facial.
I’ve watched most of the scenes and haven’t seen any vaginal sex yet. But as a fan of anal scenes, that isn’t something that I’d complain about anyway.
The scenes are all between 30 and 45 minutes long. The production values are high though my preference would be a bit less editing.
As with all of Lansky’s sites, the models are all current A-listers. They are all known for their anal scenes. Most fall into the young-and-petite category.
The site provides a lot of access on the tour pages so a prospective member can see what the site has to offer.
The site is still quite small with only 13 scenes available currently. It adds one new scene per week so it is growing, albeit slowly. (One thing I like is that the pending upload is shown so you can see who the model is and when the scene will be available.)
The scenes can be streamed though there are no resolution options for that. Downloads are available in six resolutions: 1080p, 720p, 480p SD, 480p mobile, 360p and 270p. I downloaded the 720p files and those have a high bitrate of 8000+ kb/s. The scenes look crisp and sharp.
There are photos available as singles or as a zip. Those are 2000x3000 in size.
The site layout is simple and logical, though with a site this small it would be hard to have it any other way. If you’ve been a member of any of Lansky’s other sites this will look familiar. There are six scenes per page and each scene opens to a new page for downloads or streaming. There are tags used as well. The site can also be sorted by model.
I had no issue using a download manager and I found the download speeds fast and on par with other major porn sites. I had no problems with broken links or failed downloads.
Landing on a bottom line recommendation is difficult. I hadn’t planned to join the site this soon but knew that I eventually would because it’s a Lansky anal site. I moved up my joining plans when I took advantage of a Christmas deal to another Lansky site (offered through TBP) and that site offered me a good deal on TR. Otherwise, without a discount it’s hard to see this site as a good value. Obviously the narrow focus of the site will only appeal to some people but the nagging question I have regarding the site is ‘what’s the point?’ Tushy itself is a great anal-themed site and apart from the lighting and the guy in the nylon clothes there really isn’t enough to justify a second site. One major issue I have with the site is that there are many ways that Tushy-like anal scenes could be made more ‘raw’ and I don’t think that the choices that Lansky made would be on anyone’s list if looking to bring a rawer edge.
So I guess the best that I can do is this: if you really like Lansky’s work, if you really like anal scenes AND you can find a discounted price then consider joining. The site really is well done and features some beautiful models doing anal sex in exclusive scenes. At full price though I don’t think the site is a good value yet. Given the small size and the not-all-that-different scenes the site feels more like a cash grab at this point. |
|
01-13-19 11:47am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
311
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
My preference is for no obtrusive tattoos but I also like some models that have large tattoos so I can't claim to be dogmatic about the issue.
|
01-13-19 06:18am
|
Review
312
|
Paradise GFs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful EE/Russian models
- Twins!
- Scenes on location in Thailand
- Interesting variety
- Exclusive scenes
- Streaming and downloads
- Multiple download resolutions
- Photos as singles and zips
- Logical site layout
- Low price
- Allows download managers
- Fast download speeds |
| Cons: |
- Small site
- Doesn’t appear to be updating
- Large watermark on all videos
- All POV (with a cameraman who isn’t good at it) |
| Bottom Line: |
I could start and end this review by simply writing ‘petite redheaded twins’ which alone should be enough to cause people to buy a membership but I’ll add a few more details.
The premise of the site is that the site owner/talent/cameraman is a fashion photographer who brings in models to his Thailand home to shoot them and ends up having sex with them. It’s a pretty thin premise but it doesn’t interfere with the scenes so it isn’t an issue. Each ‘shoot’ takes place over five days with some outdoor photos, outdoor sex, pool sex, indoor sex and some dancing in a nightclub. The sex scenes are all POV and there is really nothing unusual about them. That’s neither good or bad but if you join looking for twist you won’t find it here.
Most scenes start with an outdoor photoshoot. In many cases the sex begins outside but then moves inside. In a few cases the entire sex scene is shot outdoors.
One advantage that the site does have is that it offers rare ‘on location’ shoots in Thailand. I’m presuming that this site is able to shoot in Thailand simply because the site owner/male talent lives there.
The site is very small with only 15 scenes offered. There are three separate shoots with each purportedly shot over five days. The only models on the site are Kitty and Nikky Fox, a model named Cassie I’m not familiar with and Gina Gerson (as Valentina on this site).
I wouldn’t ordinarily describe the models on a site but since there are only four of them and three are relative unknowns it might help to do that this time. The Fox Twins (Nikky and Kitty) are identical 20-year-old twins from Hungary. I wasn’t aware of them until this site was listed and they don’t have much else on the internet. Nikky does have more scenes than Kitty and in some scene she has black hair though I think her natural colour is the reddish hair she sports on this site. The twins are petite and have a girl-next-door look to them. I hope to see more of them.
I know nothing about the model named Cassie. She’s a young brunette from somewhere in Eastern Europe. She’s also got a girl-next-door glow about her. She’s also got the only anal scene on the site. I’ve searched for her on model indexes but haven’t found anything.
Gina Gerson needs no introduction to porn collectors. Gina is a late-20s (though she doesn’t look over 20) petite Russian blonde. For Gina fans this site may be a necessary addition to your collection simply because she has little to no makeup on through the scenes and her natural beauty shines through. As Gina is well known for her anal sex this site is a rare collection of vaginal-only scenes.
The site itself is logical and easy to use, but it should be with only 15 scenes. There are some ads but they are easily ignored if you want to tune them out.
The scenes are available in streaming and downloads. I’m happy to report that the streaming doesn’t start automatically when the page loads. That’s a pet peeve of mine. There are no resolution options for streaming but there are four available for the downloads. Those are: 1920x1080 (4900 kb/s), 1280x720 (2300), 854x480 (1100), 640x360 (660). The bitrate is low on all of the videos and while that does help keep the file size down it also means that even the 1080p scenes aren’t as crisp as they could be.
Photos are also available as singles and zips. They are 2600x1463 resolution.
I had no issues using a download manager and I found that the site had fast download speeds.
The site has a few minor flaws. Every video has a watermark that is much bigger than it needs to be. Also, all of the scenes are shot POV (this does appear to be a one-man operation). Well shot POV is rare and takes some real talent. The guy on this site doesn’t have the talent that comes from experience so his camera work is often unsteady. If the site continues to grow the owner should make an investment in some stationary cameras set up on tripods.
The biggest flaw in the site is that it doesn’t appear to be updating. When I joined the site had three separate five-day shoots and that’s all that is there still. I have no idea whether more shoots will ever be added and if they are when they might be uploaded. But to be safe it’s probably best to assume that this site won’t update again.
While some may disagree, I think that this site still offers fair value even though it’s small, doesn’t appear to be updating and has a few other minor flaws. But I admit that I’m looking at this through the lens of an avid porn collector rather than someone who spends time on pirated Tube sites. I think that $15 for 15 exclusive and unique scenes with some beautiful models shot in exotic locations is good value. My personal bottom line is that I’m happy with my membership and I’m glad I joined. It’s worth checking out the tour pages at least. |
|
01-08-19 03:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
313
|
True Anal
(0)
|
|
01-05-19 11:15am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
314
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
LoganSix's Reply
Yeah... it was a true case of bait and switch. That happened to me with a couple of Gamma sites on Black Friday. Evil Angel was on sale for $5. How could I say no? There was no mention that it was streaming-only.
|
01-03-19 02:55pm
|
Reply
315
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
matt3131's Reply
Thanks for mentioning that. Confusing memberships are a pain in the ass. I was thinking of trying the subscription to a studio but if I only get access to that studio's stuff for the past month than that's probably not worth it.
I was a regular ticket buyer for several years and yes, it can get expensive!
|
12-30-18 08:20am
|
Reply
316
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I know... I was just teasing since my preference is younger than what you may prefer.
|
12-29-18 10:25am
|
Reply
317
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I'm glad to hear you like this site too. This has been a favourite since I found it just after it started.
I mentioned in a reply to dracken's recent review that I think that the clothes and 'daddy' thing fit into a subset of the D/s thing known as DDLG. That's dominant daddy, little girl. I had no clue about this niche until recently but I have to confess that I like it. Bryan doesn't seem to be advertising his site as such but it's too much of a coincidence for what he's doing that it isn't DDLG.
Whatever it is, I'll be a subscriber until the site closes!
One thing with your review I want to ask about. You use a phrase that simply doesn't sound like anything in the English language I've ever heard and I wonder if you switched to another language. What does "The models are too young for my taste..." mean? I think I can discern something but it makes no sense! :-)
(Great review!)
|
12-28-18 07:42pm
|
Reply
318
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
matt3131's Reply
Coincidentally I'm writing a new review of the site but I'm happy to share what I have now.
It doesn't seem that you can buy a membership that gives you access to all the scenes as the most recent reviewer said. It does appear that you can buy a subscription to each individual studio and get access to download all of their stuff though. I don't know if it's limited to that month or not though. This could be an excellent deal for the right person but I'm guessing that it wouldn't work for most collectors like us. LP has 20 studios and I like all of them. I think it would be worse to see videos available that I couldn't access. And what if the studio you subscribed to only had a few scenes per month?
As it stands, I think we're in the same place as before: you really need to do your homework but in some cases (rare cases in my opinion) buying a single studio access may be the better value.
I'm still in the camp of not liking the ticket system but thinking it's the best choice for now.
Let me know if you need any other info. I'd be glad to help.
|
12-28-18 07:35pm
|
Comment
319
|
Paradise GFs
(0)
|
|
12-21-18 12:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
320
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
|
12-21-18 09:53am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
321
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
12-21-18 09:11am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
322
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
The only time I had something similar was a few years ago when I was joining a Playboy site. There are several of them and I don't recall which one it was. It was utter crap though. (I didn't know that going in.) I intended to join for a month but due to some deception (that, admittedly I should have seen had I been paying more attention) I ended up buying a full year. I immediately discovered this after joining and contacted the site and biller. I purposely didn't view or download anything while I was trying to get a refund. The staff at TBP intervened too but nothing worked. The attitude was 'we have your money and we ain't giving it back.' The lesson I learned was to pay more attention.
Fuckers...
I have bought annual subscriptions before that and since and been happy with them. I once bought an annual membership to Amateur Allure because that site was and remains in my Top-5 favourites and because it was a great deal. If AA offered a similar deal I'd jump at it again. (Are you listening Amateur Allure?) I also signed on to Hookup Hotshot for an annual membership. That too is a favourite site and the deal was too good to refuse. I have a great deal now on a recurring monthly HUHS membership so I just let that keep running.
I guess I have no idea what point I was trying to make other than I empathize with you.
|
12-21-18 07:11am
|
Reply
323
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Thanks for mentioning this. I'll look around and see if I can find a deal. Obviously I've avoided joining Naughty America since they started messing with their memberships so now might be the time to rejoin. It baffles me why in a time when piracy is rampant and causing huge losses a site would fuck over the few people still willing to pay for porn.
|
12-21-18 07:01am
|
Reply
324
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Thanks for the positive comments. I often like to think that some of my reviews save people from joining crappy sites but I really should think more positively and consider that some people may join great sites that I've reviewed. In fact, that's how it works with other reviews here. I've joined sites that I ordinarily wouldn't because they've had good reviews here.
I read all of your reviews and it seems like we have a lot of common interests. I'll be keeping an eye for future reviews and hope that you find something that I haven't joined. I'm always on the hunt for something new.
Back maybe five years ago I posted a new review weekly and sometimes more frequently. I don't do that now because I have a long list of sites that I constantly cycle through so with nothing new to report I don't add new reviews. It seems fairly rare now that I find a new or new-to-me site that I like enough to join. I suspect that you're either there yourself or soon will be. It's not a bad thing though - I have probably 50+ sites I join regularly, some more frequently than others.
|
12-21-18 06:57am
|
Reply
325
|
B Skow
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
This is a bit late on our conversation about Adult Time, but I discovered yesterday that one on the Gamma memberships I have does give me AT access. It's a membership to Fantasy Massage.
|
12-21-18 06:47am
|
