| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
401
|
Fling.com
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ 1.mass girls
+ 2.all kind of content
+ 3.no monthly fees
+ 4.sometimes good video quailty
+ 5.making of favorite list
+ 6.billing by watching- no exact billing staying one second costs the same like 1 minute
+ 7 own favourite list |
| Cons: |
- 1.high fees from 0,99-4,99 € !
- 2.getting billed even if you join privat for one second
- 3.mostly average till low video quality
- 4.girls are shown often twice in search engine but with different names -.-
- 5.no live preview pic
- 6.no possibility to see prior if the girl is in private
- 7.no sneak preview of the private feeds
- 8.girls can bann you a lifetime :)
- 9.search engine to complicated and not detailled enough
- 10.girls are not exclusive |
| Bottom Line: |
this is a review of flingcams which is (or a part of) fling.com.
at first flingcams and Cam Crush are the rather the same sites. other outfit, same old women :)
to the PROS
there are around 600 girls online (1.) who do all kind of sexual things (2.) mastrubating, stripping, couplesex e.g. (depends on the girl)
there is no monthly fee (3.). the videoquality (4.)can be great, but like any other videoroomsite there is no possibility to filter the good from the bad. Only hint you get is a small HD what doesn`t mean that you don`t get a diashow 
one very strong pro is that you are billed by watching (6.), what means, that you are not forced to buy credits for 19,99 e.g., no you get directly billed at youre credit card. Combined with the possibility to create youre own favourite list (7.) which can have so many girls as you want, makes that funny.
but the CONS are bigger:
the price is much to high (1.)with 0,99-4,99 € per minute (better go to a real whore :) )
the billing (2.) of only looking into a room in a private section for one second is a joke. you have to pay for every started minute the full price!
mostly the videos have medium till low video quality (3.) which is like diashow sometimes the girls are often shown twice with different pictures and different names (4.), what is quite uncool.
as every site there is no livepreview (5.) pic of a room therfore you get only a recoreded and no live preview pic (7.) what could be very misleading (girl is in stocking with hairy pussy, you join the livecam and she is naked and with a bald pussy -.-). what a rubbish. the search engine does no search for e.g. socks or high quality. not good! There is also no possibility to see from the mainpaige, which girl is in private an who isn`t (6.) .
the bigger con is that all the girls can bann (8.) you from theire room, just for a while or a lifetime. and the girls will do this with a favour if you don`t type and watch what is going on in the room. that`s a no go!
At last the searchengine (9.) is not detailed enough to get a good search result. There are to less specific options to enter. Better searchengine is in livejasmin. The girls aren`t exclusive (10.) and seen on other livecamesites too e.g. camcrush.
lower the fees for all others, make the quality better and live preview pics, take away the banning function for the girls, make the search engine better then will my rating go up until then
low recommendation |
|
07-23-09 01:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
402
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
aoa? i only know aloha :)
|
05-04-08 02:06pm
|
Reply
403
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
as i surfed arround in the net i was at My Lovely Girls. that`s quite a good site. it`s a little bit eastern europe style but i like sometimes the cheap settings and those kind of girls ;).
what i expected on that site i rated was what i found on this site. (ok a little more ... i alway epect more :) )
|
05-04-08 05:35am
|
Reply
404
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
thanks for replie. i am alway happy if i can help other users with my review.
|
05-04-08 05:30am
|
Review
405
|
Flower Panties
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ full trial access
+ exclusive content
+ easy navigation |
| Cons: |
- regular price to high
- low-medium video quality
- not much new things
- girls are not what i expected
- to less videos (arround 90) for that price and quality
- plain site design |
| Bottom Line: |
positivly is to metion that you have trial access, but beware with the trial access you aren`t able to get to the networksites CutiesInTights.com,PeeHunters.com,YoungFatties.com,
PlumperWorld.com,PlumpMature.com,
MaturesWorld.com,FuckThisTranny.com,TrannyMovieClips.com.
if i look at this extra content i am not really unhappy not getting access to that :).
the girls are not that hot as i wished. few of them don`t make me even trying to download the video, but that`s alway`s a question of taste.
all in all i don`t think this site is worth trying it regular. also as a trial it`s nothing what fills my computer and makes me like watching it often.
i like good quality videos, but you don`t find them here :( |
|
04-24-08 03:21am
Replies (11)
|
Review
406
|
Frisky Babysitters
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ very fast dl speed over 650 kb/s
+ good video quality
+ do drm
+ no dl limit
+ exclusive content
+ 22 extra sites with dl possibilities
+ flash and wmv straming viewing possibility
+ dl in one part or splitted in up to 16 parts |
| Cons: |
regular price is much to high
- trial is only limited
- to less videos at this site(28)
- only wmv dl
- no possibility to see all the sites updates at one/have to change to sites to dl the updates
- older files of other sites are not possible to dl in one part
- last update 05/11/2007 |
| Bottom Line: |
these babysitters are a look worth (when the price would be lower).
this site belongs to a network. the networks give you access to 22 extra sites and the possibility to download hundreds of videos.
the network is good but this special site is only average.
the eastern europe content is nice to see but the video quality is too mixed.
some of the stuff is in bad video quality, but most of it not and nealry everything is downloadable. there are plenty videos but sadly the older ones are split up into pieces and therfore not downloadable in one part.
the variety of different sex styles is good and mostly contained with teen style 18+ (even if some of them look older the 25 :) ).
even if the models are sometimes a little bit unispired, i do like that eastern europe style.
the dl speed possibility is really quick and there is also no problem to use a dl accelerator.
this specific site has 28 videos but the quality of them is average- good.
therefore and because of the access to 22 more sites makes me rate this side to a 74.
make more updates on the single site then this site gets a 80+. |
|
11-28-07 01:31am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
407
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Review
impressive review. go on like that, i prefer those kind of info as much as technical infos.
|
01-19-11 08:45am
|
Reply
408
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
..have the desease named pubic hairloss :)
|
01-21-10 08:22am
|
Reply
409
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
still only bald pubic hair to find?
|
01-19-10 08:42am
|
Reply
410
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
FuckingGambler's Reply
thanks for youre impressive costumer support. got a a+++ from me for that. anyway, as a matter of fact, i am not able anymore to help further with the wanted infos. sorry. all the best
|
10-21-10 08:10am
|
Reply
411
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
which one did you use? i used Download Accelerator Plus (DAP)and it didn`t worked.
|
09-16-10 07:28am
|
Reply
412
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
FuckingGambler's Reply
...yes, maybe you should, but please not because of the television :o)
|
09-16-10 07:27am
|
Reply
413
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
FuckingGambler's Reply
thanks for feedback.
1. thanks for youre info & offer.as i remember, the settings weren`t saved. as a matter of different taste, i kindly reject youre friendly offer
2. i use the Download Accelerator Plus (DAP)
|
09-16-10 07:26am
|
Reply
414
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
FuckingGambler's Reply
in germany we have much television merchandising. small clips, at night mostly with sexual content. the clips you present with youre site remembers me of that clips ;)
|
09-08-10 07:57am
|
Reply
415
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
the download oppertunity is a good one, even if i had to recognize that 1. the chosen dl oppertunity isn`t saved for the next session and 2. that the use of a dl manager isn`t possible :(
|
09-08-10 07:54am
|
Rating
416
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
76.0
|
No Review.
|
08-30-10 10:16am
|
Comment
417
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
|
08-30-10 10:16am
Replies (15)
|
Review
418
|
Fucking Machine 1000
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-01-10 08:30am (Update History)
Reason: --- corrupted videofiles
|
| Pros: |
+++ discount price
+++ beautifull models
+++ good video quality (720x540wmv)
+ different dl versions (iPod version/wmv/xvid)
+ preview pics
+ no dl limit
+ no drm
+ network access |
| Cons: |
--- semi exclusive
--- search engine
--- inconsitant updates (read bottom line)
--- small collection of fuckinmachines videos (60)
- price went up
- file names changed from 2007 till today
--- corrupted videofiles |
| Bottom Line: |
that site is arround 3 years old. but they show the videos as first presented 13.11.2008. -.- that`s not fine. ok they redesigned theire sites and they look well, but you have to be honest to youre members.
to the pros
the pu discount price with 9,99 € is a good deal. the models are beautifull(all hair colours, any kind of tits and pussys exept. fat ladies) and the fuckin machine niche is well presented here.
the video quality with wmv videos, ipod and two different download qualitys of 720x540 and 320x210 is quite good. the videos for themselvs have preview pics and are with arround 300-150 mb good sized.
there is no dl limit, no drm and the network gives you access to over 130 (60 network and 70 extra) sites.
to the cons:
sadly the content is semi exclusive. the setting is like in burning ticket (read my review there from the fuckin machine site).
much more a shame is, taht the good navigation is "killed" by the fact, that you are forced by searching with keywords, you also get the not exclusive content (well known dvd`s series e.g. prouductions of combat zone)
you got 60 exclusive videos, but that`s not enough for a niche site. the former price of 7,38 € in 2007 went up to 9,99 € discount price. also the download files get different names now, so that it is quote difficult to manage youre hd.
my former rating went down, mainly because of presenting at this site in rather three years only 24 videos more.
UPDATE 01.01.2010:
after downloading a couples of files, i had to recognize, that if you download more then one file simultan, most of the downloaded files are corrupted (broken). that`s a major problem, therfore my rating went 4 points down.
all in all a try worth and therfore
Might recommend |
|
12-31-09 05:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
419
|
Fucking Machine 1000
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
thanks for reply asmith12,
i think that my last done ratings are a little bit more like that you have searched for. but anyway i will try to improve my next ratings in the bottom line to show how a little bit more how the site-specific information make me make my ratings like this.
|
10-29-07 01:45am
|
Reply
420
|
Fucking Machine 1000
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
hello asmith12,
thanks for youre reply.
my ratings are, i think like every rating, a question of personal taste.
my specific look at a side is from the pov of (mass)dol of videos. so you may are right that they are maybe similar. but i hope that my given information helps others who share the same aim.
i do not exactly know what you mean by rating with a to big range.
i am sad to read that my informations are not exactly enough for you, but anyway everyone is seeking for other information which is like his style.
thanks for youre hint to the side fuckingmachines.com. i tried it i think a year ago and liked it much, but in my remembering there was a big problem with the billing company. they took another which didn`t accept credit cards or something like this. i also think there was no possibility to dl in one part, and the older videos had weak quality (wasn`t it dl as a zip?!) you are a member of that side right now? does anything changed? :)
last but not least, you are welcome to rate me in which kind you want to, as i said, in my opinion it`s at least a question of taste which make the points :)..but i don`t think that my given information are wrong......
|
10-28-07 10:32am
|
Review
421
|
Fucking Machine 1000
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ divx video quality possible
+ different dl versions (iPod version/wmv/xvid)
+ 7,38 € regular price
+ top beautifull models
+ large content (from amateure - voyeure)
+ plenty kinds of videos
+ no dl limit
+ no dmr |
| Cons: |
- small collection of fuckinmachines videos (36)
- no help of any kind
- scene plays automatically in browser
- no downlaod manager possible
- download at 160KB
- only 1 file download at a time, in special content videos
- unregular updates
- horrible navigation |
| Bottom Line: |
i do prefer video dowloads, so that i was a little bit upset, that speciallity videos (machines) are only downloadable at once and are even that slow.
The "extras" are the well known sides (tncast e.g.) and isn`t really a try worth.
In general the site offers access to a large collection of videos and DVD`s which are downloadable up to 2. The side isn`t easy to navigate and very awfull to download files. there are contens which i am interested in, but when i join a page named "fuckin machines" i do want to see more of that stuff then other stuff.
All in all this side is because of his low price worth a try, but if they want me back and/or to stay, they have to build up the dl speed and possibilitys as well as rising of the fucking machine scenes. |
|
10-27-07 08:02am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
422
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
economical you may be right, but only from theire pov :) i have rather all filed on my hd, and the older ones are great but the quality is so low, that i really think of deleting them everytime i see them. but as a collector....;)
|
06-02-10 10:15am
|
Reply
423
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
not to understand that they don`t upgrade the old files.
|
05-28-10 09:00am
|
Review
424
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ high video quality (newer ones)
+ videos since 2008 often downloadable in one part
+ high dl speed 1200 KB/S
+ arround 500 videos
+ different video formats (streaming/wmv/real/ipod)
+ lot of pics
+ 2 regular updates per week
+ fency girls in crazy action
+ no softcore content
+ no drm
+ no dl limit
+ exclusive content |
| Cons: |
- only two downloads at once
the cons for the elder videos then 2008:
- videos are split up in to 2 - 8 pieces
- zip download |
| Bottom Line: |
in my opinion the best machinefucking site i know.
i like videos and fast downloads. that combined with funky sex machine positions with girls that really seems to like what the do is CRISPY...
you got well known actresses also as unknown women. from hairy to saved from dressed up in different styles up to totally undressed, different positions diffeerent machines.
you got mass videos in all kind of format. the hd quality is great but i takes some space at youre hd. the content is exclusive and with two updates a week, the price isn`t that much anymore then it was before.
all the cons of my last review were mainly solved. the dl speed is top, the videodownload in one part is up to date. it only hurts, that they changed in 2008 the oppertunity to download more then two videos simultan.
and however the elder the videos the lower the quality, but what shall i say to this?!
more updates would be great, but anyway, guys the work you have done is better, therfore i raised my rating with 5 points
Highly recommended |
|
05-09-09 08:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
425
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
^^..in my opinon one single clip is the best possibility even if it takes to much space on the computer...anyway the login was only working after i wrote to the discounter -.-
|
11-07-07 08:43am
|
