All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely. I never realized I had a fetish for (simulated, of course) stranglings or hangings until I came across such content, for example
|
03-01-15 08:21pm
|
Review
2
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Large Library
-Seems to be pretty cleanly divided by niche
-Acceptable interface |
Cons: |
-Files are numbered, not named, requiring manual renaming of each movie or image archive
-Downloads tend to fail if they take long enough to complete, limiting access to high-def content for users with slower connections
-Tag system seems incomplete, making it somewhat harder to avoid content that is not desired |
Bottom Line: |
There is much that is good about the network, and it is well worth the price of admission. The few blemishes do not detract from the overall experience, and it is worth a look, at the very least. |
|
04-01-15 07:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
Evil Angel
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Site has a large amount of content.
Video quality is adequate |
Cons: |
Site navigation is difficult.
Can't download all scenes from a movie from one page.
Too many actresses have only one or two scenes. |
Bottom Line: |
The large archive and overall good quality makes this a site worth visiting, but it's too much of a pain to keep a membership with. |
|
06-23-16 03:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
4
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's so common on several of the sites that they don't even bother including it in the video description. It's the main reason I'm not renewing my membership, as I hate ATM porn.
|
07-31-14 08:06pm
|
Review
5
|
Reality Kings
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Large roster of models.
-High video quality is available without being mandatory. Multiple file sizes are provided for each film.
-Very large library of archived films. |
Cons: |
-A huge percentage of their videos, particularly newer ones, devote large amounts of their time to ass-to-mouth content, which they don't tell you anywhere except on the individual video page, meaning that users that DO NOT LIKE ass-to-mouth porn will gain virtually nothing from the site, without knowing this before they sign up.
- Also, browsing the database leaves something to be desired. Many videos don't list the perfomer names (a shame if you want to find more of that particular girl), several older models only show up when searched (rather than in the browseable model index) and the names used are often not the same name used for most of the model's other work. |
Bottom Line: |
Overall, a pretty good site experience, but it should make you aware of the anal obsession before you join, as this is a very "love it or hate it" sort of thing. Some work to clean up the database would also be nice. |
|
07-13-14 08:58am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
6
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
Divinx's Reply
Yeah, I didn't really consider the bonus sites important enough to mention. While certainly decent, and featuring many of the same models as the main site, they're somewhat generic. The main site fills a fairly distinct niche, and I think that's the most critical thing to focus on.
|
08-31-14 09:55pm
|
Review
7
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Emphasizes the "Party" aspect as much as the "sex" part, making things feel more real
Attractive models, many of which have fairly limited exposure, keeping things fresh.
The group sex tends to really be group sex, with most films having at least one scene with the majority of the models active at the same time.
Most movies contain multiple sex scenes. |
Cons: |
While the site is entirely in English, and many of the scenes end with the site or network name being painted on the models (in English), the dialogue is in Russian with English subtitles. Nothing in the site description mentions this, and the video previews generally don't contain dialogue.
Models are identified by only a first name, which rarely corresponds to the name used by the model in other work.
Archive is a bit spotty, with movies missing from the sequence, and a few older ones lack sound.
Very infrequent updates |
Bottom Line: |
The site is decent, but the infrequent updates means that a long-term subscription is of little value once you've found the archive scenes that interest you. The Russian audio isn't necessarily a downside, but the site should be more up front about it, especially as the site goes for a plotty approach with a lot of dialogue. |
|
08-19-14 06:34pm
Replies (2)
|
|