| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Met Art X
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good looking website with easy navigation for updates, films, photos and model sections.
- Members can rate and favourite content, and comment on them.
- Model videos are all linked so it is easy to find more content for the same model.
- You are able to search for tags, and the advanced search option allows you to search for models based on attributes such as hair color and ethnicity.
- It’s possible to ‘follow’ models so you can see when they put out new content.
- The videos credit the director as well, and they have an ‘artists’ section where you can also search by director/photographer.
- For each video, there is a paragraph that describes what happens in the video, I like to see what to expect.
- The homepage has a big updates section, including upcoming updates. There is an update of a photo set or video every day.
- Videos and photos are professional and high quality, and are downloadable.
- They have an erotic fiction section if you’re into that |
| Cons: |
-They really push the cam girl section. On the home page there is a big section on the right, and you see it advertised at the bottom of every video/photo set, and there is a big drop down box if you hover over it in the menu bar.
- The beginning of the videos look directed (more about that below)
- For the staff selection ‘erotic films’ you have to pay extra (per film).
- The site specialises in solo masturbation, so there is not much GG content, and no content with more than 2 models.
- Not a big range of models - all mostly slim, white and young.
- Other than the shoot description, there are no other details about the model, like a bio. |
| Bottom Line: |
MetArt X is part of the MetArt network. It specialises in masturbation, with very little content of two girls, and no content of more than two girls. The videos are called ‘films’, and are presented as such, with an intro title, director and film-like music, which fades away as the model starts masturbating.
I generally don’t like videos to be directed and prefer the models to do what they feel like, and the first part of these films appear directed. However it’s not over acted and more like the director has suggested an idea and the model has taken it how they want. So even though I know it’s directed, it still makes me feel like I have a small insight into the models life and could walk past any of them in the street. These intros can be quite long, and so there can be a lot of build up before they start masturbating, which is hot. This is a site that feels very voyeuristic, that you are looking in to models having intimate and private moments behind closed doors.
I do miss the extra bits of information about the models. But that’s a small complaint compared to the pros of this site. In particular, the camerawork of capturing these beauties, which is delicate and nothing short of amazing. |
|
07-04-19 03:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks. It’s a shame they aren’t interested in improving the site as some of my cons seem to be a regular complaint (and easy tweaking, as you said).
|
07-02-19 08:28am
|
Review
3
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The site is 100% exclusive
-Weekly updates
-Favourites section for favouriting videos.
-The site has their own camgirl section.
-There are different download and streaming options. Non-premium members can now download files in HD, as previously I believe you couldn’t.
-All of their videos are at least 30min.
-New videos have a little ‘new’ tag so you can see they are recent.
-Each video begins with a nice question and answer between the model and videographer. The models are asked about their jobs, what they like to do, relationships, and sex life, which lets us get to know the models.
-The mistakes the models make are endearing and they sometimes laugh with the videographer, which is a reason I love amateur porn.
-The models are all natural and from a range of ethnicities. |
| Cons: |
-There are two types of membership - premium and normal. With premium you have to wait 30 days from sign up, or pay an extra month membership. Premium membership allows you to access a lot of extra content: behind the scenes, deleted scenes and Girls Do Toys. I don’t see the need for prohibiting certain members from content when they have paid a subscription.
-The scenes are pre-decided and directed, which is something I’m not into.
-Each video (except on Girls Do Toys) is the same - interview, blowjob, several sex positions, the guy cums. It gets repetitive fast.
-The sex is with faceless male models, where there is no chemistry and next to no dialogue between them.
-The models are nameless and there is no profile page or description about them.
-No advanced search options. This, and lack of names makes specific models hard to find unless you favourite their videos.
-Shoots don’t have an upload date. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was recommended Girls Do Porn by a friend who frequents it, but soon realised it is not the site for me.
Girls Do Porn is a site that takes amateur models and tries to recreate mainstream porn. The initial look of the site is tidy, and shoots are presented by a cover photo where the models are all in similar poses - fully clothed on a bed with a white duvet. The home screen displays a few of their recent updates with descriptions of the model and shoot, which I like. However as soon as you are in the members area, this disappears and all we learn about the models is what they say during the first 5 or so minutes into the shoot. I did enjoy this part of the video as I like to get to know the model. It also seemed to break the ice a little for those doing their first shoot. I just wish there was more of this.
The shoots appear to be made for the camera as they are directed, instead of a more voyeuristic approach where the models don’t care so much about looking at the camera but instead on their own (and others) pleasure. There were plenty of scenes showing the models enjoying themselves, but also plenty more of disinterested sex.
The faceless male models seem to exist so I can imagine myself in their position. I know this is a big turn on for many. But to me that’s more a mainstream porn approach, and not my style. For me, I love fluidity, different positions initiated by the models, and the connection between the models. There was none of that here. However, if you like amateur models recreating mainstream porn, this is for you. |
|
06-24-19 02:03am
Replies (2)
|
Review
4
|
FTV Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The website is tidy and is easy to navigate.
-You can take a ‘free tour’ of the website which gives you access to some photos and sample videos before committing to membership, which is $29.95 per month, or $99.95 for 5 months.
-You can rate and add the shoots to your favourites, and comment on the shoots.
-High quality, professionally shot picture galleries accompany all shoots. The photo galleries are nicely laid out, and you can flick through each photo and there is the option to see full size and zoomed image.
-Each shoot has letters tagged on it, for example O means real orgasm, 1st means first time shoot, BB means busty, Fet means fetish, etc. Once you learn these tags, it is easy to browse to find what you want to see.
-Each shoot has an in-depth detailed description of what happens in the scene (videographers comments). It’s nice to read what the models are like, and I like that they tell you what to expect in a sexy way. |
| Cons: |
-The website looks a little outdated in style.
-When buying membership there is a small checked box also subscribing you to ftv milfs.
-No advanced search options. You can only search by model name, use the search bar at the top, or click on tags that appear on the shoots.
-Each shoot is broken into several videos (clips) instead of one longer video. The shoot appears to be shot throughout a day, and each clip is an ‘episode’, that is filmed in a different outfit, room, with different toy or position. This may be a ‘pro’ for some, but it’s a ‘con’ for me.
-The camera work is not professional, when it moves it makes noises and jitters. But it doesn’t move often.
-Some models are not ‘all natural’, and many wear make up, which doesn’t do it for me.
-There are not many GG shoots, and no group shoots.
-Sometimes there is too much dialogue with the videographer. |
| Bottom Line: |
Ftvgirls.com is a site that features many models in their first time on camera. The shoots are usually quite long, and contain several ‘clips’, which are like episodes of the shoot day, often including a video clip of the photoshoot. Vagina and ass spreading closeups are frequently filmed at the end of a clip.
As the models are very amateur, it is endearing to see how they interact on camera, and I like that they talk about what happens, including mistakes. They have a genuinity that is sexy. I love seeing their different personalities, and finding what works for one model is quite different for another. I saw some clips where models were trying things for the first time, eg fisting, and mfvgirls has an extensive sex toy collection, which the models are able to explore.
Although I enjoyed that there was dialogue with the videographer, and there was a relaxedness about the conversations, sometimes it was a turn off when the videographer would interrupt the scene. I would rather the models get lost in the moment and for things to stop or change because it felt natural. Many of the shoots seemed directed by the videographer, and the shoots I enjoyed the most were the undirected ones. In a clip, generally the model/s just do one thing in one position eg. masturbate with vibrator lying on back. It felt like things were ‘decided on’ before shooting the clip, and the models did no more than that. This is not to say that the models weren’t having a good time. Sometimes the models still tried (pre-planned) new things, and often the clips end in orgasm. However, this is a difference from other websites I frequent as I prefer a more fluid scene where models naturally move between different desires, instead of stopping and starting. |
|
06-14-19 05:30am
Replies (5)
|
Review
5
|
ChickPass Amateurs
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
ChickPass Amateurs is part of the ChickPass network. The amateur site has over 4500 videos and 3000 photo sets, and the entire network has much more.
- There are many options for members, from a 2 day membership($2.95) to a year ($79.95). Memberships are well priced considering that members are granted access to the 21 other sites of the ChickPass network, and 6 additional bonus sites.
- The ChickPass homepage has many sorting and search features that makes for easy browsing across the whole ChickPass network. There are at least two updates daily to the amateur site, and future updates
are shown in the calendar feature.
- Videos and photos can be downloaded, and there is no daily download limit. The newer videos are shot in 1080p and they are starting to remaster the older videos to a higher quality.
- Members can rate and comment on videos and the models on their and the models on their profile pages, and videos can be saved to favourites. |
| Cons: |
- The website design and colours are outdated and gaudy.
- Non members do not see a preview of any videos or photos, but this is negated by a two day membership option. When buying the membership, there is a pre-checked sale of another site that can
easily be overlooked.
- It is very easy to accidentally leave ChickPass Amateurs and browse the other ChickPass network sites, which, although still apparently amateur, seem to more resemble mainstream porn.
- The filming is obviously made by amateur filmmakers. The videos often don’t contain many cuts, rather the person filming moves around a lot. Quite often, especially if a model is giving a blowjob, the man receiving is the one filming, in POV. I don’t enjoy POV porn, of which there was a lot, and is almost always was the case with the BG videos.
I felt no connection with the models, before, during or after the scene.There is not really any talking or getting to know the model; they generally get straight to business. |
| Bottom Line: |
ChickPass Amateurs is part of the ChickPass network, of which there are
22 sites. The network releases multiple videos and photo sets daily, from a
wide variety of models and kinks. The website was started many years ago
by Logan and his wife Vixen. Logan seems to film many of the videos
himself, and has sex with many of the models.
It bills itself as an amateur website but the way the models act and the way
the videos are filmed makes me feel like it is a site with amateur models,
trying to be more mainstream. Many of the videos are the same and
therefore not so interesting as I like to watch something a bit more creative
and unique to each model. I didn’t feel any nice connection to the models,
and in fact I left feeling unhappy as the models seem more preoccupied
with making eyes at the camera and giving the guy, if present, a good time,
than enjoying themselves. I like watching amateur porn because I enjoy
models exploring their bodies whilst trying new things, experimenting, and
having fun, rather than watching a repeat scene with different models. |
|
06-01-19 02:14am
Replies (1)
|
Review
6
|
Girls Out West
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Girls Out West is an amateur softcore site that has been running for
14 years. It has a lot of content, and new content is released daily
- Currently they have 1010 models, over 300k hi-res photos and 4k hd
videos
- Good first-month-deal: $14,75 instead of $29
- The website is classy and the colours are a good fit. It is easy to
navigate, and the advanced search is simple to use
- All videos and photos link back to the models page, where you can
view all of their content plus a bio and other fun information about the
model
- Members can rate and comment on the models and individual videos,
and you can save your favourites
- All content is downloadable, with many different options for download
including 4k. There are many membership options, including a
lifetime membership |
| Cons: |
- There is a daily download limit, but at 40GB it’s not so bad.
- Sometimes the videos take a little time to load, but this is possibly
because the server is in Australia.
- The big variability of models, while it means there is something for
everyone, also means that there may be some content that people
don’t like.
- The site only shows 16 items per search on each page, which
becomes a little annoying to click through
- Website- Style is not the best |
| Bottom Line: |
GirlsOutWest is an Australian based amateur site featuring all Australian
models. It is mainly solo and lesbian focused, but it also has some BG
videos. It is owned, operated and produced by women, giving it a uniquely
feminine perspective.
The scenes are artistically filmed, sometimes with a lot of cuts between
different camera angles, and they are fond of close ups. Although the
models are amateurs, the people behind the camera are definitely
professionals.
The models are all completely natural, with and without hair, and many are
‘alternative looking’. Cute, butch, curvy, hippy, tomboys, they have every
type of model.
The sex is real and believable, and Girls Out West offers a unique insight
into the personalities of the models with their profile pages and ‘behind the
scenes’ question and answer videos with partner and group shoots.
Watching the videos, it is easy to see the connection the models have with
each other, and they don’t mind taking it slow to enjoy everything. The
filming reflects this, artistically focussing on the models’ enjoyment. It is a
fresh perspective on amateur porn, watching the mix of models
masturbating, exploring their bodies and having fun with each other, which
is a big yes for me.
However many of the more popular models have a lot of content,
sometimes it feels like they are more professional than amateurs. I enjoy
watching amateur porn to watch girls who are still new to the industry.
As well as this, I like watching porn to learn new kinks to try with my
girlfriend and that’s what I like about GOW best! |
|
05-25-19 11:58am
Replies (1)
|
Review
7
|
abbywinters
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Abbywinters.com is an amateur, softcore, girl next door site that has been operating for almost 20 years
- thousands of videos and photos, and over 1700 models
- You can see a new update every day, with several new videos and photo sets every week
- most of the website is masturbation or GG, and any BG sex is with a real life partner
- There are a wide variety of tags/fetishes, from menstruation, fisting, and peeing
- easy to filter using the search options
- Weekly scheduled open playdates with models are available free for subscribed members with private playdates as pay per minute
- playdate calendar schedule can be seen a month in advance
- Option to buy and send in a dildo for a model to use in a video, and an open discussion board for members, staff and models
- There are four ways of subscribing, from full membership, mobile only, pay-per-scene wallet credit, and pay-per-scene direct.
- Non-members can enjoy a free preview of the members site before commiting
- for each shoot |
| Cons: |
- The website interface could be better organised and categorised
- Specific fetish shoots are found in a roundabout way through categorised photo albums
- occasional glitches in the website, a video is posted multiple times in a row, or a photo is uploaded or tagged to the wrong category
- Every new web page opens in a new tab, which creates clutter |
| Bottom Line: |
Each shoot contains a short but vivid description of the models and the videos, and many videos interview the models on their day to day life, hobbies and kinks, giving it a more familiar touch. It can feel like you really know the model or The scenes are unscripted and model-driven and it is nice to see an open dialogue between the models that you don’t see in a lot of porn. The features such as ‘dildo drive’ where you can buy a model a dildo they use in a shoot and the discussion board make it even more personal. Shoot locations are not confined to the bedroom, with many outside. There are even fun shoots like wrestling and rock climbing, which pleasantly surprised me.
The only downside for me was the website layout and navigation. There is a ‘type’ of Abby Winters girl which is young, relatively slim, and because the girls are amateurs, it is generally softcore. If you! are into plus sizes, older models or hardcore porn, this site is not for you.
The filming is tastefully done and doesn’t switch too forcefully between close up and far away. There is a nice variety of shoots that can satisfy lots of different fetishes, from vanilla masturbation to fisting and anal play. Because there is so much content you can easily find something you will like, and you can find softcore fetishes that you didn’t know were possible.
The diversity that Abby Winters offers you fulfills all imaginable phantasies. Alltogether the natural beauty and appearance of the girls lead me here and will also keep me here. When you watch a video by Abby Winters, you don't feel intimidated by the models at all. Quite in reverse! It feels more like it could be your cute neighbour or just a girl you meet at the pub next door. What triggers me the most are the nice hairy pussies. Such a delicious, HOT website!!! |
|
05-17-19 09:50am
Replies (1)
|
Review
8
|
Ersties
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Mix of single, GG and even GGG or BGG-shootings
- in addition to explicit scenes, members also have access to interviews and personal selfie pictures from the models - all downloadable.
- Menu shows other content available of models you like
- you can filter between 40 different tags / topics
- Shoots hit lots of niches like spanking, squirting, anal…
- Cost to join from $15 a month is very reasonable
- new function: date when the shoot is published
- the customer service provided gives the possibility to ask (and get a fast
response) for personal ideas, suggestions and/or other feedback about models and shootings
- you see the real personality of the models through their interview videos, learning about their sexual preferences and kinks
- possibility to personalize your members area with your favorited shoots and models
- Truly authentic, not scripted or directed. Each shoot is allowed to play out naturally
- Live cam-shows are available
- fast video- download in all qualities |
| Cons: |
-Models are updated part by part so sometimes you have to wait to see the whole set of a model (Which sometimes I actually enjoy, the suspense can be fun)
- Site is mainly solo, girl/girl, girl orgies. There is some boy/girl but not a huge % of the site.
- No Milf-Shoots |
| Bottom Line: |
- If you’re looking for videos that portray natural and authentic sex, then Ersties is the site for you. Due to it being shot by women, the content is much less about the masculine (cum shots, domination etc) and more about actually enjoyment and real-life fucking. The amateur nature of the site is evident as most of the girls featured do not appear elsewhere, you really feel that they are, as the site says, authentic amateurs.
Each shoot features a cool interview with the models, what they like, what they don’t like, sexual preferences and the reasons for wanting to fuck on camera, it really brings you closer to the girls. I really enjoyed the mix of shoots, G/G, Solo masturbation, Threesomes, orgies, and quite a lot of kinks are on display within the huge library of shoots.
It actually helped me to improve and explore my own sex life. Gaining an understanding from the girls in the shoots about what women really like, how to introduce Anal, or squirting in to the relationship (there are ‘first time’ videos of both these things which show how to slowly build up to the really fun part).
The look, layout and feel of the site can be a little strange at first, when compared with the more polished look of Tube sites etc, but I think that’s the point really. Ersties is different to other sites, and this is reflected in the look of the site. It started out as a project between students who wanted to display what female pleasure really looks like and it still retains this DIY feeling. There is no specific ‘type’ of girl on Ersties, which I really like. What they have in common is the desire to show off their sexuality, meaning you can see girls of all shapes, sizes, colours and nationalities. Some of the girls have more of a unique look to them that might not be to everyones taste (tattoos, piercings etc) but most are natural and gorgeous, no matter what your taste. The unique part of Ersties is making you feel so much closer to the models than other paid porn sites, like you have a VIP ticket. It’s really cool. |
|
05-10-19 08:16am
Replies (3)
|
|
