| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
226
|
The Female Orgasm
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Something I can relate to and feel the experience -- the female orgasm.
Over 3,000 scenes of women having orgasms.
1,500 photo sets and 500+ models.
I signed up thru CCBill
The scenes are impersonal, which I think is a good thing in this niche. You won't feel like you know the model any better after the scene as you did before the scene.
Variety of sex toys used |
| Cons: |
It says I have access to 3 bonus sites. Each time I try to sign into those bonus sites it says my login is invalid. There is a message scrolling across the screen that says the bonus sites had been down, but are back up. They're not for me.
The scenes are extremely short. I have seen some of as short as 1 minute.
Could use better camerawork with close-ups |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined several of these real orgasm, feeling myself sites to do a comparison of them. The first point to make is I believe all of these women are having real orgasms.
I don't believe the site is getting the most out of the scenes. With varying degrees of orgasms, levels, they could have these models go for more than one small one, which is what a lot of the scenes are. I have watched maybe 30% of the scenes and would say more than 50% are minor orgasms.
Most women I know do not stop at the minor orgasm. That's when they are just really get turned on and very wet. Some of the scenes are longer (10 minutes plus) and those do seem to go for the deeper orgasms. It's very believable masturbation from start to finish and that's what the site is selling.
I think they could do more by having more of the scenes where the women use a vibrator or Magic Wand over their pants or panties. They do have some of those scenes and those are the best ones.
What I believe the main criticism is these women look like they showed up to masturbate. Everything is in place from the camera to the noise levels in the background and they are primed and ready to go. That is not realistic. When a woman gets the urge to masturbate she might go to a restroom in public or she might go to a friend's house and use their restroom. She might be taking a shower then the urge hits thanks to the shower massager. There's no feeling of spontaneity.
It's not a big complaint since they don't advertise themselves as having spontaneous masturbation. It just makes the scenes linger in that area of formulaic and clinical. The scenes that do break this pattern are the ones listed as "from the web". I will assume those are user submitted. Those are the shortest ones, but often are the most erotic, as they look like the woman had been masturbating well before the camera was turned on and just the orgasm is recorded.
I haven't watched enough porn to know if these women are regular porn stars or amateurs. I do recognize Jenny Mendez. Her scenes are some of the best on here. She starts out rubbing her clitoris and reaching the minor orgasm, then uses a Magic Wand or dildo to reach full orgasm.
The camerawork is a complaint I normally wouldn't make. I usually don't even notice the camerawork. There needs to be more zoom on the orgasms to show contractions and secretions. I do get the feeling the site is going for a more amateur feel to the scenes, but they are losing some of the best parts by keeping the camera at the same distance.
They could be an advertisement for the Magic Wand as that is the one the women are getting off with fastest. Which in my experience is also true.
They videos are good quality. I usually am more of a streamer than downloader. The download options on the newer scenes have full HD and HD and two smaller options, presumably for mobile devices.
The picture sets show more of what the videos should show. The women touching themselves in their clothes. It would take away the feeling that they are just there to see how fast they can orgasm.
I am not going to do a direct comparison to the other sites since I have not reviewed them yet, but I do like this site. I'm not a lesbian, but I can appreciate watching a pretty, young woman reach orgasm on camera. You will see a lot of thighs shaking, calves flexing and toes curling, continuing the belief these are real orgasms. Maybe there is some jealousy on the short ones? An orgasm in 3 minutes? How much more efficient my days would be if I could pull that off.
I would even like to see them add some sort of simulation for the woman. Maybe a screen of a porn playing that she's watching or just bring average guys in to sit and watch her. It needs a little something more added to it to be the very best of this niche. Not that I know if any of these types of sites actually do that. I have a feeling they don't.
It's more enjoyable to me than the mainstream sites where you can tell the director is telling the model to move a certain way to get her better side or better parts into the video. The moans are more realistic as well.
I haven't seen many that went to their limit and that's what I would like to see on a site like this. Yes, she had a minor orgasm at 3 minutes in and then a full orgasm at 9 minutes in, but let's see her go for one more and make a complete mess of herself and the sheets, bed or whatever she is sitting on.
I like the site a lot and could see myself coming back. Hopefully, they will get the bonus site access fixed. They update with 1 video everyday and a photo set every few days. Very happy with this site as a whole and hope they continue to improve it. |
|
09-10-19 02:26am
Replies (2)
|
Review
227
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A unique site on a network (Met Art) that I typically do not think “unique” applies to.
Updates every 4 days and is a large site.
More solo than expected and that is what makes it interesting. Women practicing, trying kinky sex acts with themselves.
The newer scenes have 4K and quality is very high on every aspect of the site.
Navigation is good, clean layout, though there are a few ads I would knock off the screen. |
| Cons: |
I feel this way about a lot of kinkier content. Some models seem to be made for it while others are not. There is some feeling of uncomfortableness from the models. Which does hurt scenes like these.
I also am a member of Met Art X and there is a lot of similarity between the two with just the kinky act being the separating factor.
Videos too short. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site on a promo and am glad I gave it a try. As a relative newcomer to the glam porn sites, I have a lot of preconceived notions about any sites that have the word “Art” in them or that are associated with sites with the word, “Art” in them. This site is associated with the Met-Art network.
The size of the site was the first good surprise. There are 1,330 scenes/films, 2,879 picture sets and 1,247 models. They update every 4 days making the numbers go up relatively fast compared to other sites. The videos are very good which I wasn’t expecting either, but I will say, the shortened length of these videos is somewhat disappointing. Some are even split into parts. I don’t see the reason for the parts unless it’s just to get more content to look like more updates. But maybe that is just me. I have not been easy on other sites for using this same method. It would be unfair to do so here. A good example is a scene called, “Penis Practice”. It features Antonia Sainz and this scene has a part 1 and part 2. Part 1 was released in early November 2021, part 2 was released in late December 2021. It takes on a whole new level of confusion. Part 1 isn’t a video. It’s a picture set. Part 2 is a video. I thought it was standard these days for a scene to be released with photos and video. As small of a negative as that sounds like it just feels like a move to entice only to make you wait over a month to get the video.
The good part is the scene is an interesting and sexy, even erotic show of a woman practicing how she will please a penis with her hand, mouth, pussy and that is a welcome change to most porn. I want to say that it’s the theme of this entire site. It is a look into each model’s life and how she explores her sexuality. If things were more cohesive that would make this even better (like not releasing pictures a month before the video). The majority of the scenes follow that one in style. One scene is a model testing her nipples sensitivity with pressure and if nothing else, I have to give them points for trying something different. The masturbation in the scenes does seem to be genuine and enjoyed. If you are into the pictures, the pictures are very high quality and available as zip downloads. The videos are unlimited downloads and come in 7 resolutions/formats with the last several years offering up to 4K. I’m very impressed with the content itself as the scenes themselves tell the story of what is going on. What I’m not impressed with is the lack of cohesiveness. If I download a photo set in November, but don’t get the video until 6 weeks later, I am going to forget what was going on in the photos. It seems their biggest strength could easily be their biggest weakness unless they start releasing those together. Still, it is recommended. I am enjoying the site a lot. |
|
01-12-22 05:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
228
|
Trans500
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No longer operating as a network but is still a great transsexual site.
Currently showing 718 scenes which is lower than it used to be. It looks like they have removed older content.
A real strong point that is often overlooked by transsexual sites, full picture sets of the transsexual model. Those are downloadable but could use a better resolution option. They offer 1600px and 1000px.
Video downloads are up to 4K. I haven’t run into download limits.
As is this case with all transsexual sites, some models with appeal to one group, the other models will appeal to another group. All are attractive. There are some of the prettiest transsexuals models on this site.
Joining, cancelling, can be performed through Paypal/Epoch now. I noticed the comments about cancellation problems. |
| Cons: |
It is always the case with a site this big. There are some of these models that I’m just not into. I prefer the feminine looking transsexuals. There are a lot that are feminine, but you will always almost get some that are not.
Preferred the older format of the site which was broken into networks/themes. Everything is now grouped together. They are known for one niche I like a lot (solo), those scenes are now mixed in with the regular scenes. Filters help but are reliant on someone tagging them properly.
Scene count has dropped. |
| Bottom Line: |
Trans500 still advertises itself as a network but the only way you can use it a network is to search the sites names “Trans at Play” for example. Since they have removed some scenes, it makes it difficult to take the search results as accurate.
What this site does is focus on the transsexuals. It is probably as close as you will get besides Grooby, to finding glamorous transsexuals. The very good pictures. Even their outfits, the teasing and I have said before, a transsexual teasing is something porn does not do enough. The transsexual has the ultimate tease. I do know this site had some connections to some of the bigger networks. The male that is in the scenes has been on, I think, Reality Kings, Bang Brothers and a few others. He just kind of gets in the way, to me. What makes him acceptable is he seems to know that. He seems like a relatively humble guy. I don’t know if he’s that into transsexuals that he can’t stay away or what.
I was a member of this network a few years ago. I will show the missing scenes just to show why it’s kind of frustrating. On my hard drive, under Trans500, I have over 600 scenes. I know that I didn’t download everything. Under the specific heading, “Trans at Play” I have 412 scenes. The site doesn’t even have that many if you search for Trans at Play. Their advanced search engine still has the option to filter by site. I used it to select Trans at Play. It came back with 23 pages of results. None of the pages after page 1 work. You click on 2, it tries to open the page but there’s nothing there.
If you don’t know that it is not as big of a deal. They are updating. If you look into their older scenes. You see a lot of gaps where they’ve removed scenes. I believe I saw a few from 2003, 2004, it jumped to 2009. They’re not reusing the content. The new updates have 4K option and are ones I haven’t seen. It just looks like they wiped out all their older content except for a very few scenes.
It still is a good transsexual site, especially if you like solo transsexuals. There are around 100 solo scenes that show up in a search but it’s higher than that. It’s more in the 200 scene range. I know this could be offensive to say. Most of the solo transsexual models are the prettiest to me. It’s disappointing to see that they removed content and no longer let the network work like it used to. The sites they originally had were Trans At Play, I Kill It TS, BehindTrans500, Super Ramon and TS Girlfriend Experience. When they had that style of site, you knew which sites have the solo scenes. You didn’t need a search engine. The advanced search engine is good for what it is. It shows sloppiness to me. They blend the individual model names in with the tags and niches.
Even with these problems, you can avoid all that and just go through the updates. I do that and I use the solo tag. I have found that just scanning through the scenes is a better way to do it. They do have a few scenes of post-op transsexuals including pre-op female going to become a male. I think that is interesting. Even as a transsexual fan, I never really thought about the women that have sex change to a dick.
The site updates once per week. They could even improve how the video downloads are listed. There are these options on the newer scenes: 4K, high, medium, low. High is 1080, medium is 720 and low is 480p. I am sticking to that sloppy or lazy comment. They have very good content. If they improved the pictures resolution. Cleaned the site up so the search engine can work properly or go back to the network style, it would score even higher than I’m scoring, probably even 10 points more. I have been on sites that underwhelm me with this content but have good management, navigation and everything is clear, and scored those higher than I felt those sites were in my subjective opinion. This one is the opposite. I happen to know there’s more scenes. Still recommended. |
|
02-08-22 06:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
229
|
Tricky Masseur
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
have learned to never trust a masseuse again thanks to porn.
There are 229 scenes on the site, but they haven’t updated it since May 2020.
The newer videos have 4K, but 1080p is more of the high standard here.
Pretty, young girls (18-22), athletic guys.
It may be the one niche that has an automatic story built in.
Vendo is the billing processor. |
| Cons: |
This niche is repetitive even when done well.
Very inconsistent update schedule with 3 so far in 2020, 6 in 2019 and 4 in 2018, that mainly matters if you’re looking for 4K.
They could at least massage the woman before sticking their finger up her ass. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like massage porn. The best I have seen does become repetitive since there’s just not a lot you can do with the stories. I would rate this site in the middle or lower in comparison to other massage sites I have tried. There’s nothing that bad about it, but the inconsistency in updates combined with very little actual massaging makes it only okay as a massage site.
I have made it clear I like younger/older porn. Most masseuses I have met in real life are older. This site isn’t the only massage site that misses the opportunity to get in a second niche with an older male masseuse, but their masseuses on this site look like the jock next door. It’s just poor planning to me. If you go in a house with the jock next door, take your clothes off and lay on a bed, it’s not likely he’s going to be massaging you gently for very long. I feel like there has to be some sort of level of believability.
You get 229 scenes here. Around 30 of those have 4K downloads. The rest do have at least 720p and around half also have 1080p. There are “pictures” but they are really screenshots as you can see the subtitles on them. That is a feature I wish all their sites had. All of the scenes I have watched from this site have subtitles. They are basic subtitles that are sometimes funny. Not being a native English speaker, it’s hard for me to tell if it’s broken English, but they have made me laugh.
This looks like a site they had high hopes for. The girls are mostly young, pretty and flat to moderate chested. Which makes for good massage scenes. It adds to their naivety. An inconsistency I have noticed throughout this network is with the pictures. The pictures on this site can’t be downloaded in zips and almost seem pointless since they are taken directly from the video.
It’s a good site if you like massage porn, but haven’t watched much massage porn. The guys are not bad looking on this site, better than most of the sites on this network even, but they seem out of place. They look more like the pervert that’s peeking in while the masseuse is massaging the young women. It’s worth a look if you have a membership to the network. |
|
09-28-20 10:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
230
|
Tricky Old Teacher
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Old and young niche plus teacher and student niche.
There are 237 scenes. Each has a video and downloadable photos.
Includes 30 other sites with several having the old and young niche.
Newest videos include the option to download in 4K.
Streaming player works above average.
Network is easy to use and each site is even easier to use with some faults.
Mostly average to cute looking models. |
| Cons: |
It looks like there is a way to search by each sites models, but it doesn't work when I do it. It just shows all the models for all their sites.
It looks like they update once a month.
Few of these sites are that strong by themselves, but as a whole the network is pretty good.
Video quality can be inconsistent. |
| Bottom Line: |
My moods towards porn change often. I was looking for old and young porn, a more common theme in real sex in my home country. I saw several sites on this network that have the old and young theme. I think if you like that niche joining this network is a good choice. They have at least 4 old and young sites on the network. In my experience, a site with 250+ scenes is doing pretty good.
The theme here doesn't always work out how I would have preferred. I like the in classroom scenes, but a lot of these are older tutor goes to younger students house to help them with their homework and they have sex. Some scenes are outdoors too. The sexual parts are as good as any of the older with younger niche scenes I've seen. There's not much story or dialogue. The girls seem to be as much if not more into the scenes than the men are. Maybe that's part of the niche? The men seem surprised the young, cute models are attracted to them.
One of the newest scenes has a 4K option, 1080p, 720, 480p and 360p options as well. If you go back 4 pages into the updates, 8 pages total, you will start finding obscure resolutions like 468p and 286p and those are the best options for the second half of the content. It looks like this site has been around a long time and they just update very slowly.
The content is good for the niche. The men are as energetic as they can be. Some of the men are not in that "really old" group. They look more like 40's, maybe 50's. Some of the others look 60's and 70's. The female models look 18-24, most are slim, small built and are very poor actresses!
The amount of content between this site and the other older/younger sites on the network make it a good buy in my opinion. |
|
01-13-20 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
231
|
Tricky Spa
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that lives up to its name, it’s up to the viewer whether that’s a pro or not.
103 scenes, but quality may top quantity in this case.
They stick with trickiness in length of scenes, some are 50 minutes, others are barely 20, some have stories, others don’t.
Really attractive models (some of the guys too), there are 114 models including males. Also does a good job on the “creepy, older guy” casting.
All videos have 7 download formats including 720p and 1080p, but no 4K. Photo sets are also included and downloadable, they look like screen captures to me. |
| Cons: |
If you join thinking this is another massage site, you are going to be partially disappointed. Or if you’re expecting scenes in a spa or even anything related to a spa.
Their update schedule is tricky too. No updates in 2021, none in 2020, 1 in 2019, 2 in 2018 and the other 101 came between 2015-2017. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site oddly appealed to me. It’s part of a message network and the first 50 or so scenes followed the same formulaic “massage scene” style. The room was the same in all those scenes. The scenes were short (most under 20 minutes) and it was just another massage site. I am going to take a guess that someone said “this is just another massage site” and maybe a producer got replaced. The last 50 or so scenes could be anything. Some are in a bedroom, the actors and actresses seem to try and keep with the spa/massage theme, almost in a sarcastic way like Abella Danger throwing a cup of water on a guy. These scenes have stories and are often 40-50 minutes long. I feel like those scenes should be a message to all porn sites. Why not just let the actor and actress (a few have more than one female) just go with the flow instead of following a set formula? I am impressed by how many of those 50 newest scenes end with the guy cumming on the woman’s body instead of holding his cum for the cameraman to get a closeup of the woman’s about to be splatted face.
Even though the updates have been sporadic and most are from a few years ago they do still offer downloads up to 1080p on all of the videos. The picture sets, I’m not a photo set expert by any stretch of the imagination, but the photos look like screen captures to me and they are the same resolution as the videos. I don’t think you can have any optimism about new scenes, but these newer scenes on the site make it look like they just stick scenes on here that don’t fit on their other themed sites. Maybe they will find some more new scenes. I do believe the actors and actresses play a big part in my enjoyment of the newer scenes. I don’t really like naming an actor in what will be seen as a negative way, but Eric Masterson makes the most perfect, “creepy, older guy” and he may be trying to go for that in his acting. These newer 50 scenes show what decent acting can add to porn.
The first 50 scenes were mostly guy massaging woman, woman notices guy is aroused, massaging turns to sexual touching and then sex. The newer scenes don’t even have massage in them. I still can’t give the site that high of a score. It does seem like it’s a site where someone just decided they were going to completely change the direction of the site and it worked. It’s just there are not any new scenes coming out. Just like I can’t give it a really good score, I can’t give it a bad one either. It is called “Tricky” spa and they just completely changed the theme of the site midway through its life. |
|
08-09-21 03:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
232
|
TS Bailey Jay
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large solo transsexual site of the very pretty Bailey Jay.
637 downloadable photo sets.
270 downloadable videos including 161 solo.
The site updates 6-7 times per month.
Is part of the TGirl Network.
Premium quality videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The network itself makes using any of the sites confusing. There are multiple ways to download and each site only uses one of them.
It says there’s a daily download limit of 8GB. I have not hit it. They could lower the bitrate too.
Price is a bit steep considering some of the sites aren’t updating and haven’t in awhile. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bailey Jay is one of the prettiest TS models in porn. She looks like one the AAA female professional models in porn. Except for the fact that she has a bigger than average dick, gets very erect and shoots cum better than most male porn stars. That is an important part of TS porn since a lot of the TS girls are taking hormones and it causes them to have problems with keeping a full erection or fully ejaculating. It’s not a problem for Bailey.
Bailey likes to do solo scenes. Some of these do include her using a dildo on herself while masturbating her dick. She has implants, but because of her natural build being of a medium build, they do not look overdone. Her neck up is where she stands out in the TS world. The first time I watched one of her scenes I thought she looked like former supermodel Cindy Crawford. She is that pretty.
She also does hardcore and some of the scenes are titled “with stranger” and I have no way of verifying that or disputing it. It is noteworthy that she seems to like the “bottom” role even though she is often as big built as the men and with her looks she could probably get some “top” roles.
A few minor complaints include the bitrate in the movies. An 11 minute, 1080p movie should not be nearly 3GB. The bitrate on most of the 1080p scenes is higher than the bitrate I have seen on 4K scenes from other sites. If that download limit of 8GB per day is working that would severely limit how much you could download in a month. They do give you three choices for video downloads and that might be the answer to avoiding those incredibly large 1080p files. They offer a 480p version and a 720p version in WMV. The file size difference is 1080p at 3GB, 720p at 400MB and 480p at 100MB. I’m sure I can live without the excess bitrate of the 1080p.
I do like this site more than the others on the network since it is loaded with content and everything is easier to use on it. It looks like they put a lot of work into this site while the others are not near as consistent. The amount of content tells a little about Bailey, she does seem to much prefer having photos made than video. The updates are currently 5-6 photo sets per month with 1 video per month. I don’t know where she ranks in current TS models, but I have to think she’s near the top. |
|
09-28-20 10:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
233
|
TS Playground
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My continued favorite transsexual site.
954 scenes and a new update every 4-5 days.
The prettiest transsexuals without turning to outrageously expensive Asian T-Girl sites
Video downloads are of excellent quality and the photo sets are not bad, also downloadable.
I would be okay with every scene being solo, but they’re not, this is still one of the biggest solo transsexual sites I have been on with 641 listed in the categories section as solo.
Pairs well with their Transsexual Angel site to give you even more content. You could join the network just for the TS content (over 2,000 scenes between those two sites) |
| Cons: |
Only 30 scenes with transsexuals having sex with women.
They could do a little more with the scenery. A few of the newer scenes are outdoors. |
| Bottom Line: |
The second con is something I will start with. It’s transsexual porn with the majority of the scenes with solo. It’s similar to male solo scenes. There really isn’t that much that can be done with the scenes. It’s a male or transsexual masturbating, but if you watch female solo porn, there are different locations, pools, gyms, outdoors, in public, while both the transsexual and male solo scenes are almost always on a couch or recliner. That could eventually start being a problem for me.
There just doesn’t seem to be a market for transsexuals with women. I know better, but to show the scarcity of it, there were five new transsexuals with women scenes in 2021. The previous one before those five was in November 2019. It does look like they have realized there is a market for transsexual with women. Five in 2021, zero in 2020, one in 2019, one in 2018, one in 2017, one in 2016. There were around 15 in 2015 and before. Hopefully, that is a good sign for the future.
I do believe these are the prettiest transsexuals on an American site I have seen. I still like the Asian T-Girls best, but those sites cost double, even triple what this site does and usually have a lesser number of scenes. There are 641 solo scenes, and that is the reason you should join, if you are joining for the TS scenes. I don’t know if this is sexist to say, but transsexuals having sex together or with men is rarely that appealing to me. One of the best scenes on this site is also one of my favorite scenes from any site. It is Carol Penelope, Nina Lins and Spencer Fox. That’s a very sexy transsexual, pretty woman and the guy is mostly blocked out by those two.
The download options on videos do vary. The site has been around since 2012. I believe all scenes are directed by Jay Sin, who is one of the better directors of transsexual porn. The solo scenes, as limited as those are by nature, are still good and don’t feel too repetitive. I do like seeing the transsexual dressed up in pretty lingerie. It’s a weird fetish of seeing my ex-husband wearing lingerie. I would recommend this site as a starting point for straight men that are maybe interested in a little something different or more. While it is on a network that’s not known for being classy, the scenes on TS Playground are on the classier side. The transsexuals are very close to looking like women, with many of them looking more like women than men until they take their pants and underwear off. One of my favorites is Keite Fenandes, you should look her up if you’re curious. I think my feeling is if enough straight men start watching transsexual porn there will be on the market, especially scenes with women. I don’t know if that’s being too closeminded, but it seems like having transsexuals with women would be a bigger market than transsexuals with men or other transsexuals.
This is my favorite transsexual site and I do include Transsexual Angels in that since it comes with the network. You get quality, quantity and a new scene every 4-5 days. I believe it makes Evil Angel one of the best buys. I am working on getting more into their other sites. This could be the perfect network for me. |
|
01-12-22 08:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
234
|
TS Playground
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my favorite Transsexual sites, was the first one I ever joined.
861 scenes with a new scene added weekly.
Very pretty models, I think the prettiest non-Asian transsexuals.
Newer videos are 1080p and are unlimited downloads.
Photo sets for most scenes and these are also downloadable.
More solo than hardcore scenes.
Also includes scenes of transsexuals with females. |
| Cons: |
The site runs and loads slow. Download speeds are fine.
There is not a lot that can be done with a solo transsexual scene. There is a risk of becoming repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
While I believe Grooby's Ladyboy Ladyboy is the best overall transsexual site, this site runs a close second. What you do get here is bigger dicks. Ladyboy Ladyboy is more about the beauty of the models, the erotic movements, while TS Playground does have a lot of very pretty models they are going to get more attention for the size of the transsexuals dicks.
There is a lot of variety in the scenes. There are transsexuals with transsexuals, transsexuals with men, transsexuals with women and solo. The site is easy to use and navigate, but it does load slowly. It also has what I call false loads. There will be times it tries to load, but nothing comes up on the screen. That is really the biggest complaint I have. This was the first transsexual site I tried several years ago and it still impresses me. There are some of these scenes where the masturbating transsexual becomes so aroused she squirts cum on the camera.
I do like the transsexual with women scenes so those are a bonus for me. The production is more polished here. I believe Mike Adriano produces these scenes. There is a more professional feel to the scenes than most transsexual sites have, but it doesn't hurt the enjoyment factor of the scenes.
There are 861 scenes with all 861 scenes offering downloads from 160p to 1080p with 240, 360, 480, 720 all also being available. The photo sets besides being downloadable also have around 100 photos in them.
You will notice the lengths of the scenes varying greatly. Some are as short as 5-10 minutes while some are as long as 80 minutes. There are even group scenes which isn't real common in the transsexual genre and to make it even more uncommon, some of those group scenes include men, women and transsexuals. It's a very good transsexual site that is one of the few I have seen that look more mainstream and professional. It's highly recommended and is also cheaper than a lot of transsexual sites. This site also comes with full Evil Angel access too. It's how I discovered Evil Angel. The billing goes through Gamma and is easy to cancel. |
|
09-09-20 02:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
235
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Even with few recent updates and possibly a bleak future, it’s still one of if not the best transsexual with women site.
A large collection of 327 scenes that should be a starting point for any female interested in this niche.
The scenes are long and most have a separate theme from transsexual with female. There Is bondage, BDSM and even sex toy use.
All scenes have 720p as the largest resolution download. The one new update as 1080p. There are also smaller resolutions available.
Not all, but many of the scenes have the best part of transsexual with women porn. You have to watch the scene to see which one is the female and which is the transsexual. The preview picture often doesn’t show much difference.
There are photo sets and those can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
This may sound weird, but the more masculine transsexuals don’t look right with the female models.
I’m holding onto hope that Kink will continue to produce this content, but it has been 5 months since the last update. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just like I believe transsexuals with females is the way to make transsexual porn more acceptable to straight men, it is what first attracted me, a straight female, to transsexual porn. A site like TS Pussy Hunters does, in my opinion, appeal to a larger market than all other niches in porn. You do have to think deeply to see that, but it’s there. The feminine transsexuals could be attractive to lesbians (boobs, pretty faces). Any of the transsexuals could be attractive to straight women and gay men (hard dicks in action). The female in the scene is attractive to straight men and it’s still a dick going in the woman. I don’t see a group that would be 100% against it.
Unlike TS Seduction, Kink’s other transsexual site, I feel like TS Pussy Hunters improved over time. It didn’t start until 2012. Some of the newest scenes are in my all-time favorite scenes. I would recommend the scene, “Prime Real Estate” to anyone new to the niche and interested in it. It features TS Foxy and Lotus Lain. Lotus has more of an athletic/traditional female body, hair pulled up, while TS Foxy is close to matching the feminine curves Lotus Lain has. Lotus also looks 4-5 inches taller than TS Foxy. Both are great in the scene, and I would love to see them do more scenes together. I had no interest in Lotus Lain’s scenes until seeing that one. Not to my surprise, when I searched for more of her scenes she had older scenes with men, some with women and does seem to be a very real bisexual woman. I believe you can see roles being defined in these scenes. You can tell some of the females are mostly just into the scene for the dick. Other females will be more affectionate, kissing and passionate like there are bicurious feelings being shown.
Long scenes are not always a good thing in porn, but none of these scenes feel like they’re dragging. It’s my thought, the females may need time to adjust to seeing a feminine face with a masculine reproductive organ. I could be looking too deeply into that, but it is why I like transsexuals with females porn. I try to watch and see the chemistry, the connect, the disconnect.
Even though it’s Kink, you’re not going to get a lot of craziness. Most of the scenes have a minimal theme and story to them. There’s not a lot of heavy bondage or devices used. You do get the high production values Kink is known for. I just think you have to know what they’re showing or you’re supposed to be looking for. There are scenes where the female is using a strap-on on the transsexual and you may have trouble telling which is the female. There are scenes blended in with themes from other Kink sites, including wrestling scenes with the transsexual and female wrestling for the right to be the top. This site kept me coming back to Kink for years. Hopefully, if it doesn’t continue, another site or sites will see what an underappreciated and unrepresented niche this is. |
|
02-08-22 06:01pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
236
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Being from a country and culture that even in some religious beliefs says we are gender-less, the TS sites get a lot of interest from me, but most are not that good. If you like the feminine TS models with men you should look at Ladyboy Gold. I thought their models were the most feminine and pretty. Nearly all of their hardcore content is TS with male or TS with TS. Also, another one I reviewed recently Ladyboy-Ladyboy or Ladyboy.xxx, you get both and another Ladyboy site with one membership. Most of the Ladyboys are of slight frames lending more to the feminine look.
|
09-30-20 12:13am
|
Reply
237
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
It's definitely a favorite of mine. I just hope they aren't ending it. Most TS sites I have tried have almost no story and it just seems out of place for this genre. Like the straight woman isn't going to question why this pretty woman has a dick? Most of the sites just leave it open to interpretation. This one does a good job of I guess what would be called "selling it" or making it seem more realistic.
|
09-30-20 12:04am
|
Review
238
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Uncommon transsexual site with all scenes about TS having sex with females.
The most accessible transsexual site with broad appeal to straight men, gay men, transsexuals, straight women and bisexuals.
A total of 326 scenes which is more than I have total from all other sites of TS with women.
Long scenes including some episodic ones that tell a story over 3 scenes.
Videos are maxed at 720p and they are as clear as most 1080p videos. Unlimited downloads on those.
Picture sets that you can also download. |
| Cons: |
Most likely is a Covid situation. Stopped updating near the end of April 2020. Before that it was averaging 2 new scenes per month.
I’m sure some people would want 1080p and maybe even 4K, but with the length of these scenes and high bitrate, I’m not for sure how practical the bigger resolutions would be. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the first TS videos I remember watching was from a series that I think belongs to Evil Angel called, “Baby Got Balls”. It was TS with women. Not long after that it seemed the TS industry switched to focusing on a TS with another TS or a TS with a male. You can still find TS with women scenes, but they are not that common and the biggest reason I like this site so much is it’s the biggest collection of TS with women I have found.
The scenes do have high production values and most of them have at least some basic story with some of them having a full story that carries over into other scenes.
The site has 326 scenes with each including a video and photo set. The video can be streamed or downloaded and the download options are: HD, Large, Medium, Small and Mobile. The HD is 720p, the Large is 540p, the medium is 360p and the other two are below 280p. The 720p as the highest available download shouldn’t be too off-putting, the bitrate is over 5000 and they look very good in full screen on a 1080p monitor.
The scenes do bring in other niches and elements including bondage, whipping (not too violent) and most types of light BDSM. It surprises me the transsexuals are always the dominant one. I don’t know why they wouldn’t flip it in some of the scenes as I would like to see the female be the dominant one with the TS.
This site delivers to a very broad audience. Most of the transsexuals on this site do not fall in the Tgirl grouping, they are feminine looking, but most are either using hormones and converting their bodies into females (natural boobs) or are just look like a very athletic female. It is one of my favorite sites and has been since I first discovered it. I do think it will pick back up on updates as Covid slows. It seems to be one of the most popular TS sites on the internet and has a bonus to it, it comes with the Kink network. That is part of my belief about the broad audience. Men that are maybe curious about transsexuals can join Kink then check out this site without joining a solely TS site.
My score would be a little higher if I knew for sure they plan to continue this site once Covid has slowed or stopped. Their last 3 updates were of The Smut Peddlers series and showed a level of creativity rarely seen in TS porn. It would be a shame for them to stop there. |
|
09-28-20 10:30pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
239
|
TS Raw
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large ladyboy site that I’m not for sure if it’s updating, even though it shows a January 2022 update.
Good site for people to get their first experience with ladyboys.
There are 4K downloads available, but it’s why I have a red flag about the new updates. A few of those do not have 4K while the older updates do.
It almost makes me blush to say, the biggest dicks I have seen on ladyboys besides someone like Long Mint.
Fairly kinky scenes, no condoms, a lot of rimming and the males in the scenes are mostly attractive too.
There are 483 scenes on this site. It does show new updates. I haven’t been a member for two years. I can’t really go back to the downloads I have and see how much if any is recycled. |
| Cons: |
Just based on the name you’re not going to get much solo action which is my preference and you’re not going to get the ultra-rare ladyboys with a female.
The oldest scenes are from 2009 and those are very small resolution. I believe maybe 360p. The older scenes are not really worth the hassle. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a highly recommended site for males that are interested in transsexuals. The ladyboys, in my opinion, are an easier place to start. There is a more feminine side to the ladyboys. The one glaring problem I see is the implants are very noticeable. It looks kind of like most American porn sites. I do not mind as much. I would love to see these ladyboys in solo. Some of these ladyboys on this site are probably more in the range of 5-7 inches in dick length. There are much better erections than you see on a lot of ladyboy sites. I do not have the knowledge of how this all works in the porn industry. These ladyboys remind me more of slimmer, smaller framed transsexuals. I don’t believe they’re taking a lot of hormone therapy. I’m not for sure these ladyboys cross that transgender line like a lot of ladyboys do.
One of the scenes listed as a newer update has the model DeeDee in it. The model names on these sites are terrible to say the least. They do the same name with a number behind it like Patty 3, Emmy 4. I believe Long Mint, one of the best known ladyboys is on this site. She’s likely listed as Mint. It is a very large site with nearly 500 scenes. There’s nothing resembling a story or plot in these scenes. There’s not a lot of kinkiness other than the bareback part. You don’t see hardly any ladyboy topping the male on this site. That’s where the site’s age shows. It’s why some of the other sites I reviewed show a progression and some creativity. The best part about these scenes is looking at the pretty ladyboys with the big dicks. I hate to reduce myself to that, but it is the selling point of this site. I find it very arousing when the ladyboy is in reverse cowgirl and her hard dick is pointing straight up and not moving.
That is why I think this is a good place to start. It’s not going to require the viewer to enjoy anything other than seeing people aroused. Even with the risk of becoming repetitive and dull from scene to scene, the one part that saves it is the ladyboy. I have learned about size perception. I know that Long Mint herself has talked about she has a very large dick, but she’s also tiny. It makes her dick look even bigger than it really is. She showed her hand size, and it was more like a female’s hand. You see those scenes with her and you’re really looking at a small female’s hand around that erect dick. Long Mint is one of the few ladyboys I know of that has talked about her life and what it’s like. She even speaks fluent English.
There’s no reason for males to feel threatened by these little ladyboys looking like they’re packing 8-9 inches. It’s probably closer to 5-6 inches. These scenes are not as interesting as the newer scenes on their other sites. It’s very straightforward sex.
I checked the video quality of those newest updates. Those have 720p and 1080p. That’s the January and December updates. The updates before those two have an added 4K download option. I don’t believe I recognize these two newest updates. I like both of them. I believe I would remember. The one is with DeeDee, she is one of the ladyboys that is very capable of keeping an upward pointing erection during reverse cowgirl. She may be the best at it. She does have a very noticeable boob job. The other is Lee 3 who is one of the cuter ladyboys that surprising to me has no trouble getting and keeping an erection. She looks teeny, tiny in frame. Her legs are half the thickness of the male that’s with her. It’s her weight that makes her look so small. She is 5’5” according to site and 94 pounds.
I enjoy this site and have for years. It’s never changed much. It isn’t going to touch on many fetishes. It’s still a good place to see what you think of ladyboys. |
|
02-08-22 06:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
240
|
TS Seduction
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the Kink Original sites that lasted almost to 2022. A very good transsexual site if you like transsexuals with men.
It’s a large site with 651 scenes.
The transsexual model is often the dominant one. That does make this different than most transsexual sites.
Most of the scenes are long (over 30 minutes).
There is bondage, suspension devices and just plain, straightforward scenes.
You can download photo zip files. |
| Cons: |
As much as I like transsexuals and this site, transsexuals with men is my least favorite niche in the transsexual genre.
Other than the newest scenes, 720p is the highest download option on the videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t know if this site has officially stopped producing content. There were 4 new scenes in November 2021. The word “seduction” is used loosely. In some ways, humorously. Like the scenes where the straight man is tied up. No seduction needed if they’re tied up! The site probably shows its age. It has been around since 2007. Transsexual is viewed quite a bit differently in 2022 than it was in 2007.
This site is a regular Kink site. I mean it is rougher than regular porn. It wasn’t a mainstream site when it started. There originally was more bondage, rougher play. One of my favorite transsexuals was a regular performer, Mistress Soleli. After transsexual transitioned to more acceptable, the site did lose some of its edginess, but it by no means lost its appeal. I talked about in another of my reviews of transsexual site, I like to see what I call straight male-friendly transsexual porn. I don’t think this is straight male-friendly.
If I had one major complaint with the site it's that the site never really tried to be anything more than a transsexual topping a male. It was difficult for me to see that control shift in every scene. I would feel the same way if a site focused on a woman being the only one in control in a straight scene. It is TS Seduction, after all. It is also the easiest way to say, without being offensive, the main transsexuals on this site are more masculine.
It went from being a very good site with a lot of potential to being just an okay site. The slowdown or stoppage from Covid stopped what looked like a possible shift in thinking/casting. More feminine transsexuals like Eva Maxim and Chloe Kay (one of the prettiest transsexuals for me) are in a couple of the newer scenes. I believe I said it once before about the average transsexual on this site. There is a rougher, harder look to the average transsexual on this site. Kind of like crossdressing men.
The site is still worth checking out, even if it’s just for the older scenes like when Gia Darling was on the site and Mistress Soleli. The site does offer over 600 scenes which is far above average for a transsexual site. I would recommend any that try it out to stick with the older scenes. |
|
02-08-22 05:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
241
|
TS Seduction
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Transsexual models seducing men and couples.
Very big site with 646 scenes.
Each scene has a video and photos. You can download unlimited videos and photo sets.
One of the better streaming players for previewing scenes before downloading them.
Interesting scenes with each one ending with a short interview with the TS and other models in the scene talking about their interest in the once taboo niche.
Good production, some bondage, some scenes look rougher and it creates variety this niche usually doesn’t have. |
| Cons: |
The dungeon setting is used for a lot of the scenes. I do think the setting of the dungeon not only takes some of the creativity away, but also makes the scenes look alike.
There are no big resolution videos. The highest they have are 720p.
Some of the TS models really get into the domination in these scenes. These are mostly American or tall, powerful TS models, the action gets a little too rough at times. I like rough, but seeing a man whimpering is a little more than I like or want to see. |
| Bottom Line: |
TS Seduction is one of the transsexual sites I think could be harder for straight men to be into even though they have scenes with women (pussies) in them. The site gives you the premise of a transsexual wanting to seduce a “straight” man. It’s much better than the similar Reality Kings site, “Tranny Surprise”. It is, however, a more hardcore, more dominant, more forceful site than Tranny Surprise. Which I’m only mentioning since the title of the site has “seduction” in it.
They have a good variety of scenarios in their scenes. There are scenes with a transsexual and a straight man. Scenes with two transsexuals and a straight man. Even a few with more than 2 transsexuals with a straight man. There are also scenes with a straight couple (male/female) with a transsexual having sex with both of them.
It is interesting to take note the scenes with a transsexual with a straight couple are almost all in a bedroom with a nice bed and furniture. Most of the other scenes are in the dungeon where bondage is used. That could be what makes me see these scenes as being more hardcore and forceful. I don’t believe any of it is against anyone’s will. They just do a very good job of making you believe that. Though the whimpering seems pretty real!
This site has been around a long time. The oldest scenes on the site are from 2007. The updates stopped in late April 2020. The CEO of the site and network posted a letter last week that said they have used up all of their previously recorded content and are having to turn to compilations and licensing content from other sites until they can start filming again. I do believe this site will start updating again. It’s hard to believe one of their sites that consistently updated for 14 years would be one that gets the axe.
They have 646 scenes with photos and a video for each. You can see the video quality difference from the oldest scenes to newest scenes even though they are the same resolution. The newer ones are clearer.
The transsexuals on this site might not be as attractive to straight men as a ladyboy site’s models. One of the models if you want to look her up is Danni Daniels. Be sure not to search for Dani Daniels. That’s a female model. Danni is attractive to me, but I like men. She has a lot of tattoos, is muscular and athletic. She does a lot of dominating. She also is in at least a few of the scenes with straight couples. I don’t think this site has as broad appeal as its sister site TS Pussy Hunters, but it’s still a very good site. There are no solo videos on it. All scenes are hardcore. When combined with TS Pussy Hunters and Divine Bitches those three sites are what makes Kink a great network for me. |
|
10-06-20 12:10am
Replies (0)
|
Review
242
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An older Kink site that adds an athletic twist to the world of lesbian porn.
Nearly 1,000 scenes.
The scenes are enjoyable in sections. I found myself fast-forwarding a lot, but the good parts were worth it.
The site seemed to change over the years and the best scenes included a female model referee that would also get involved.
Loser has to do what the winner wants (oral, strap-on).
Fun mismatches that carry a sub/dom side-story to them.
Multi-women team matches were the best for me. |
| Cons: |
If there ever was a site that needed video scenes downloadable by part, it was this one. I found that I watched the last 20 minutes more than the first 40 minutes.
I didn't really understand the scoring system. It does seem to be staged to reach the desired ending.
Has not updated in over a year. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was an athletic woman growing up, soccer/lacrosse/field hockey, but I never tried wrestling with other girls. That just seems like it's asking for a porn shoot to happen!
I have read a lot of the other reviews on Ultimate Surrender and agree with most of the other feelings. This site had its high points (Dragon Lily's reign, Isis Love's reign, the live matches in front of crowds), but besides those you are mostly receiving a lesbian site with an athletic theme added to it.
For all the corniness in porn, I can appreciate how Kink used that with this site. What person hasn't looked at a beautiful woman in a bikini with her legs spread open? Here they have no choice as the opponent has their legs spread open and won't let go. You do get the feeling there is something athletic happening. I saw a couple of scenes were a model seemed to seriously sprain her ankle and they really are sweating unlike those scenes where there is some spritzing them with a water bottle to create the sweat effect.
If the site is not going to start updating again, I would really like a scene of the most prolific models on here, Dragon Lily, Isis Love and maybe one of the producers talking about how much of it was staged and maybe telling if they had matches where the women really got competitive and even angry with each other. I watched a couple where the women looked very upset with each other and their muscles were shaking from the force they were using.
You have to think something like that would/could happen and it would give an interesting view of the content to go back and watch it.
They have nearly 1,000 scenes, Kink's streaming player works as well as any and some scenes are worth downloading. I think the models in these scenes are maybe more important to these scenes than the majority of sites. A lot of it goes into in good taste, in bad taste. One of the injury matches had a woman that was probably 6' 200 pounds vs a woman that was 5' 110 pounds. And the heavier woman knocking the smaller one down and falling on her caused the injury.
I think this niche could be expanded on and seriously improved. I have only watched the Evolved Fights scenes on Kink and they do focus on fixing some of the problems the Ultimate Surrender matches have. They also have Dragon Lily as their referee.
Ultimate Surrender is a great site for what it is. Those that like women in tight or skimpy clothes, rolling around, tearing at each other's clothes, would find a lot to like here. The sex is mostly the same sex you will find on any lesbian site. It is a little rougher sex here than most lesbian sites. I would say focus on finding the Dragon Lily, Isis Love and live scenes. The scenes besides those have a more generic feel to them.
A fun, different and unique site. |
|
11-18-19 09:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
243
|
Ultra Films
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with three other sites, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls and Wow Porn
There is a promotional rate of if you pay for one month and you get another free
The biller is Vendo and you can pay with cryptocurrency as well
The videos are available in 4K if that works for you. Some are even 6K. I am happy with just high definition.
The website is easy to use. Including a welcome email that has a link to click that signs you automatically. |
| Cons: |
Separate log in for this site from the other three
Would like to see them make one of the three still updating sites a little different, maybe some fetish content? |
| Bottom Line: |
Ultra Films has a special promotional rate of pay for one month and get one free and you also get three other similar sites in the same package. The deal actually works out better as buy one, get one than as simply half price, as they have a frequent update schedule. Ultra Films has been having either a video or a photo set added every day recently. I found that the longer I was a member, the longer I wanted to stay.
For me the major draw is that the models are pretty and perform well. They are mostly Eastern Europeans and therefore mostly white and thin. The scenes are very hot to watch as well. Some of the bigger name stars to be found here are Serina Gomez, Rebecca Volpetti, Cindy Shine, Lady Dee, and Sofi Goldfinger. The fact that they are mainstays on sites from Eastern Europe shows just how beautiful they are as well as the fact that they can make any scene they are in sizzle. There are also many other models that added to the value of the site, but I don’t recognize them.
As of today they have more than 480 videos and nearly 1100 photosets. The sex includes boy/girl heterosexual with 150 videos, more than 360 scenes tagged as including masturbation or 130 tagged as lesbian. As you can see, the tags come to more than the total number of videos. They are artistic and show the talents of the women very well. I think these can have a lot to offer women who appreciate that the women are the stars much more than the men and the men have their role to play too. The cumshots are big enough, mostly they are external, and the guys have nice looking penises.
The scene that is the highest rated is called “Inexplicably Wonderful”. It has five women and one very lucky guy. They are in a park and use the bench to make a very memorable scene. Outdoor scenes often have poor lighting and group scenes often have weak camerawork. But this scene breaks those chains and I love the models and the attention to detail.
The navigation is easy and intuitive. There are both tags and filters to help you find what you are looking for. The downloads are really fast and I think maybe even the best I have ever experienced. The video quality is state of the art with recent offerings having four download choices, the usual high definition, a better quality high definition, 4K and even that rarity, 6K. As if that were not enough, you also have a choice between 30 frames per second and an even better 60 frames.
The other three sites that are included in a membership are Wow Girls, Wow Porn and All Fine Girls. They are more similar than different, the members pages are laid in the same way and feature a lot of the same models. If you like the quality, you will find the quantity very well worth making these sites worth joining. |
|
03-20-22 10:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
244
|
VideoBox Men
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
More naked men than an orgy in Rome
Streaming feature works well
488 advertised "straight guy" scenes...
Good price and has gift card join option...
No annoying ads
Easy signup and cancellation
Downloads are unlimited and can be downloaded with a download manager. |
| Cons: |
488 advertised straight guy scenes with 200+ of them having the straight guy having sex with another man.
The gift card join option charges more than the regular pay option charges.
Videobox Men should have a blend of content for gay men to watch and for straight women to watch. If the title was Gay Videobox, I would not complain about it.
Video quality is average or below. |
| Bottom Line: |
My first experience with pay porn was Videobox. I joined it in 2011 or 2012 for 2 years. It came with a free Roku.
It was only natural for me to give Videobox Men a try. I knew it was aimed at gay men, but it also features "straight men" on their preview. After all, the site is named Videobox Men, not Gay Videobox, which I think it was once named.
I should have expected less. The site offered a 1 month membership for $12 or I could trade in a gift card. I had a $20 gift card from a store that I no longer am near. I entered it to trade it for a membership. The $20 gift card turned into 16 days access. If paying cash it is 40 cents a day. If paying with a gift card it is $1.25 a day. I had no use for the gift card so I pushed forward with the higher exchange rate.
I opened the categories and went to "straight men". This is from the first 32 scenes that showed up -- 16 had men having sex with another man and 2 of the others included men give themselves auto-fellatio. I understand there is a market for gay men to see a straight man seduced into sex with a gay men, but should it be called "straight man"? The straight men category only makes up 488 of 9,253 scenes.
I tried the "solo" category. This number is not going to be as poorly labeled as the straight man category was, but of the first 32 "solo" scenes, 7 have men having sex with each other. Solo equals one person.
I found some of straight men masturbating. Some of those looked like they were recorded before I was born. The videos had a yellow tint in the background like a vintage newspaper. The videos had skips like old film projectors had. You cannot watch a man masturbate with the screen bouncing up and down.
I did find some newer DVDs they have with names like, "Men of Erdine", "Men of Istanbul" that might be straight men masturbating. Nothing great for me -- born in India -- and not attracted to Middle Eastern men, but maybe they are adding some solo straight scenes.
I have tried to watch gay scenes. Some are okay, but it is not very realistic for a woman to fantasize that hairy man taking it up the butt is her. The solo scenes at least can let a woman feel like we are the one recording or we are masturbating along with the man.
I have a negative feeling about this site even for gay men. Most of the videos seem generic. Even if others do not see a problem with the category problem -- I think it shows a lack of attention for detail -- and would believe it is not just a problem in the categories I used in this review with those problems. I feel bad for those that subscribe mostly to gay porn. The quality does not seem to be there; neither is the care we see in straight sites.
My score includes some points for more than half of the newest solo DVDs being of what appear to be straight men. They have one called All-American Beauties. The men are believably straight, but one of them masturbates with a pumpkin and another sticks his penis in a seashell. The voyeuristic quality of watching them masturbate with odd objects is okay, but I would start laughing at both of them.
That is the other reason I feel bad for those buying gay porn. There is a lack of production quality.
I only would recommend it if you have a gift card to a store without a quality website or location within 1,000 miles of you. |
|
07-14-19 01:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
245
|
VIP 4K
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A “network” of 13 sites all filmed in very high quality.
Vendo is their biller. I like that Vendo remembers my email and password and shows me all their sites I have active memberships with and lets me cancel any or all of them from one screen. (This could be a bad sign that this is a major pro).
The scenes are of good length, averaging over 30 minutes each, but there is very little story.
All scenes have 4K download option and some even have a downloadable subtitle file which I really like and would like to see other sites include a subtitle file. It’s a SRT file.
Navigation is simple, interface is clean and fluid. The videos are crisp even in the 1080p and 720p versions. |
| Cons: |
Possibly the best example I have seen of “this shouldn’t be marketed as a network”.
No model list, no way to find other scenes of models you like (unclickable names), no tags
The action in the scenes is hit or miss based on whether you like the niche. They do have some cuckold scenes I enjoyed.
Not all scenes have photos and no dates on the scenes.
My last pro listed is very important as is the third con. They are doing nearly everything right except there is a lot of cookie-cutter feel to most of the scenes. A sameness from scene to scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought this was going to be a network I could get 3-5 reviews from, but I’m only doing this one. Calling this a network is like calling a department store, a mall. I will list the sites in the network and how many scenes each has.
Black 4K has 12 scenes, Daddy 4K has 16 scenes, Debt 4K has 13 scenes, Hunt 4K has 24 scenes, Law 4K has 7 scenes, Loan 4K has 15 scenes, Old 4K has 12 scenes, Rim 4K has 13 scenes, Sis has 12 scenes, Tutor 4K has 7 scenes, Stuck 4K has 11 scenes, Fist 4K has 9 scenes and Mature 4K has 10 scenes.
That means this 13 site network has a total of 168 scenes. One could even complain that Daddy 4K and Old 4K are the same niche. I have reviewed sites that are not huge, but according to the information on TBP this network launched in 2018. That was 2-3 years ago. How can a network of 13 sites only average 55 new scenes per year? Maybe I am being a little hard on the network? But when you don’t list dates on your scenes and you have a very small amount of content relative to the number of “sites” you have on the network it makes me wonder if this network has any kind of future. That’s why I said the last pro is important. The site itself is very nice, the navigation is as smooth and easy to use as any site I have been a member of. The technical quality is very good with every scene having these video download options: 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile and most scenes have photos you can download. It would be a shame to see a site with the technical potential this one is showing just fall off due to lack of content.
The hit or miss concept continues despite all those excellent technical choices, the models names are not clickable. If you see a model you like you can’t click her name to see if there are more scenes of her. There is no model list. There are no tags and that may be forgivable since each “site” sticks to whatever niche/theme is in the title.
The overall size of the “network” is a little small for the price. I do get that they are charging more since they have all videos with 4K options. I joined the group of those with 4K monitors that are still downloading 1080p. The 4K downloads just aren’t practical. I will just pull a random one up to show the size difference. “Mother’s Friend or Undercover Freak?” The 720p version is 1.7GB, the 1080p version is 3.4GB and the 4K version is an insane 14GB.
I can say I do not know any of the male or female models on this network. When you combine that with the above complaints it all feels generic. It’s like the big selling point and draw is the 4K. That’s not near enough for me. If I was running the site I would just stick everything on one site and not promote it as a network. It seems that’s going to upset more people than make them happy to get a network of 13 sites averaging 55 combined updates per year.
They do the technical parts right, but everything else needs work starting with a model list and ending with dating the scenes and keeping a list of updates. I don’t think I have seen or noticed a new scene since joining 3 weeks ago. |
|
04-14-21 07:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
246
|
Vivid
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my favorite studios for DVDs
Large selection of their classic scenes
Around 6,000 scenes including celebrity sex tapes
The search works well.
There are photo sets, but they are small and rarely go with a particular video. |
| Cons: |
I wasted two months of subscriptions trying to download Vivid Classic DVDs, first as an Adult Time member, now as a Vivid member. The DVDs are broken up on both sites. You have to find each part of the DVD.
While they do release a new scene each day it is only part of a DVD. If you are looking for the whole DVD you have to wait until the other parts are released.
Way too much emphasis on the celebrity content. The main page has two rows of celebrity sex tapes and most are 5 or more years old.
NO Adult Time access with the Vivid subscription. |
| Bottom Line: |
Last month I joined the Adult Time network to download Vivid DVDs. What I found was a mess Vivid scenes piled in together, out of order and with no way to group the like (DVD) scenes together. I had to search "DVD name, scene 1". The 7 related scenes would have 2 or 3 scenes from the same DVD, but many of those DVDs have 8 scenes in them. It became too frustrating to try and find them all.
My Adult Time subscription ran out so I thought I would try joining through Vivid. It works the same way on the Vivid site.
They do have the option to search by video, then put them in alphabetical order. This does line up a lot of the scenes in the right order and at least makes it doable. It was better than this the last time I joined (2016).
It was better downloading them from Videobox's Vivid channel than this is. Before, you could select a DVD and all the scenes would show up for download. Now, you have to click through pages of alphabetical listings to put the pieces together.
Why wouldn't Vivid come with Adult Time? It's one of the sites they really push on Adult Time. I am going to go through and get the ones I know Videobox doesn't have on their Vivid channel, then pay another $15 to add the Vivid Channel to my Videobox account just so I can easily find and download the scenes I want. After that, I do not plan to return to Vivid.
There are at least some good newer series that are easy to find in the sites category. The Nasty Stepfamily, Orgy Train and Mom is a MILF are all good series that are newer.
I am glad I figured out how to get the scenes to lineup in order or my score would have been much lower. I found 80 classic DVDs that Videobox doesn't have on their Vivid channel. Those make up for the one month subscription price.
If you are a Vivid fan I would recommend joining through their site and using the movies, alphabetical or date filter. On Adult Time, I couldn't get the DVD scenes to line up no matter what I tried. This is story-based porn. Having each of the scenes is very important.
I will give Vivid an 84, but Vivid on Adult Time is a 70 at best. |
|
08-18-19 10:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
247
|
Wank My Wood
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
51 fun scenes that I really liked a lot.
Very athletic looking, buff and in shape, masculine guys.
Offers 4k and 60 fps for two scenes and the rest are in 1080p at their best.
There is the ability to play the scenes in slow motion, which is great for cumshots.
Easy to use site. |
| Cons: |
Not updating
There are not enough tags, but honestly I don’t think this matters much |
| Bottom Line: |
Because of the name, I was expecting a site that was from a guy’s point of view. However, I was pleasantly surprised at how much I liked what I saw. The guys are very good looking, the kind of guy that I like to see in porn. They are masculine, buff and in shape and had nice manners. To me that is very sexy, even more than anything else that I can think of.
I could also relate to the women. They were, for the most part, natural and not play acting or overacting. The scenes start with a little dialog, but really it is just no more than a pretext. I would have liked a bit more of a reason for the sex, but at least there was playful banter and the women were very willing partners.
I was expecting just a stroking scene with the women there to please the guys. Nothing could be further from the truth I saw onscreen. The women had other kinds of sex, such as oral or vaginal, but it came across as that the women were just doing what we do naturally when we are with a nice looking guy with an attractive natural playtoy. They were not huge monsters and you could see that most were about the size of a woman’s hand and maybe a little more. My guess would be about 6 and a half inches, which for me is the perfect size. In many scenes the couple gave each other compliments and encouragement as well as telling each other what they liked. They say sex is mostly mental and I agree. A few scenes had a premise where it was in an office and the couple knew each other as boss with employee. One was even a therapist who got a bit carried away helping her patient relax.
In most scenes, she strokes him and he tries to reciprocate by either fingering her or in some cases vaginal. She plays with his balls a lot in most scenes. I have found most guys are not okay with that, so for me that is a fantasy that I look for in porn.
The scene I liked the best was called Hot Skinny Redhead Jerks Off Her Boyfriend and starred Layla Exx and Jarrod Steed. He got me with the name. He sounds like he is hard and ready to go. Unlike many of the other scenes, there was only stroking and no other sex. She absolutely loved what she was doing and he had his eyes roll into the back of his head. She kept asking him if he felt good and he kept telling her how much he was having fun, as well as what he liked for her to do. She kept telling him how much she enjoyed being with him and how much she was enjoying this. One thing I really liked was that she played with his balls just about nonstop. I never get tired of seeing guys balls and seeing them getting cupped and stroked. He eventually came on her smiling happy face and the cumshot is quite the scene, especially when I used the feature that lets you play it in slow motion. For me a one quarter speed meant I could focus on what I like the best in any porn scene.
The site had a few other user friendly features. Besides one quarter speed, also available are half, normal, one and a half and double speed. Maybe I don’t know enough about porn, but I have never seen those as options before. Some other features are that you can favorite a scene, make a playlist, and even change the filters. Choices for those are natural, black and white, and vintage. I went with natural, but I can see why you might want to go for saturate on a few scenes. I tried vintage and black and white, but why would anyone want those? The scene descriptions were helpful and there are trailers. You can stream in choices that start with 720p as the best. There are more choices for downloading such as 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p.They have both photos and screenshots too.
There are a couple of cons. Besides that, the categories and tags are not very helpful, as there are only a few. In all fairness, with 51 scenes that is a con I can live with.
I am not sure what guys would think of this site. I think they would agree that the women are pretty and a few are a dream come true. They come across as naturally interested in these guys, so for me that is a huge plus. I would not hesitate to recommend this for any woman. |
|
12-08-21 07:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
248
|
We Fuck Black Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The reverse interracial that porn usually gives us -- black women with white men.
125 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
One update per month currently.
All videos have 1080p and 720p download options unlike many of the sites on this network.
102 models on this site.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
It needs a faster update schedule. The network seems to be turning a corner with this site.
There’s not much story, but the scenes feature multiple scenarios which does help (doesn’t become as repetitive). |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
The very first 3 scenes on this site gave me hope that this wasn’t going to be another site that sticks to one scenario. The newest 3 are a one on one scene between a white guy and black teen woman. The second newest is a five white guys with one black woman scene. The third scene is a threesome between two white guys and one black woman. This could be read as a putdown towards the network itself, but that’s more variety in 3 scenes than many of their other sites have in thousands of scenes.
The site’s size is hampered by only one update per month and I’m sure some people would question if all the women really are “black”. That’s one I experience in real life and it goes further into a topic I don’t want to touch.
Though the scenes do offer multiple scenarios they are still your run of the mill porn scenes. The women -- I would think, are the biggest interest in the site since there are some really pretty women on it. The stories (have to read them in the scene description) go back to old stereotypes. The newest scene has a very cute Cecilia Lion with Van Wylde. The description tells she’s always checking out her “surfer neighbor”. I will at least say the person who writes the descriptions at least is creative, saying she noticed “his longboard”. I would just like to see more of that creativity make its way into the scenes.
This is easily one of my favorite sites on this network. Unlike so many of the others this one at least offers 1080p and 720p on all 125 scenes, but still has the $3.99 for 4K per scene price too. The scenes are longer, even the one on one scenes, with many going over 30 minutes and it does show -- at least I think, that Dogfart is trying to improve their sites and the production values. I would have paid the monthly price just for this site. It reminds me a lot of the standalone sites other large networks offer. Great site that really boosts this network. |
|
02-26-21 06:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
249
|
We Live Together
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very beautiful lesbian scenes.
800 scenes including a video, photos and screenshots
Videos stream well and can be downloaded (with upgrade $15/mo)
Mostly American models, tattoos, implants and piercings are common. I like tattoos and piercings, don't really care about implants.
Tag system is good, but it can by iffy on accuracy. |
| Cons: |
Hit or miss scenes. It seems like for every good scene there's a bad scene.
Too many ads, when you sign in you are met with a full page ad, every page has multiple small ads on them.
Probably 200 too many scenes. There's obviously a limit on how much you can do with "we live together" and it shows as many scenes feel like you've seen them before -- and you have.
No longer updates. |
| Bottom Line: |
We Live Together has a good reputation as one of the best American lesbian sites and I do think they earn it. It reminds me of when a band that keeps releasing a new album every year hoping to find their magic, but they don't realize they're out of ideas.
There are 800 scenes, that's a lot for a lesbian site and at least 200 of them are excellent, I would estimate 400 of them are okay and would be dependent on if you like the models in the scene. The other 200 feel like retreads.
The story of the scenes is simple. It's two or three, sometimes more than three, young, college age looking models that live together and decide since they share an apartment or home they are going to share themselves with each other.
For my taste in lesbian porn there's too much pussy licking and not enough kissing, touching, fingering. It is sold as the women reacting on a whim to finally try sex with another woman. It's not really that believable that they would jump right in nose up to clit.
The scenes are streaming only unless you pay the $15 upgrade fee. With an upgrade you can download up to 1080p. The tagging system could use some work. One of the tags on the We Live Together site is "cumshot". Another is "blowjob".
The oldest scenes had more of an amateur feel to them and are generally better. They have a couple of women in the earlier years that were regulars. I would think that would have been the direction they would have liked this site to have. You could have shown how the progression to trying lesbian sex turned into more then you could have had something like one of the women cheating on her girlfriend with a guy.
My feeling towards it might not sound as positive as it is. I just felt like the scenes were becoming stale and dull. It's a very good lesbian site. Is it possible for a porn site to pigeonhole itself too much? That's the feeling here.
The models aren't the problem. Even in the newer scenes they have some really pretty models. I think it's well above average, but it's not quite into the elite area. |
|
10-15-19 12:21am
Replies (0)
|
Review
250
|
Web Young
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, cute, college-aged, pretty lesbian sex.
More hardcore in some scenes than I expected.
Scenes are mostly over 30 minutes, with some nearing one hour, good stories and setup.
There are subtitles, but the scenes I watched are speaking English. They do have other language subtitles too.
Updates twice per month, currently 468 scenes with downloadable videos and downloadable pictures.
The video quality is excellent. All scenes have at least 1080p, with the newer ones having 4K. |
| Cons: |
I listed the more hardcore scenes as a pro, but they do a very good job on the more softer, teasing style scenes. I don’t know if they should just try sticking to one way or the other.
The older scenes include some solo which I’m not really into with these young models. They are not very sensual by themselves. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have a love/hate relationship with the younger female models porn scenes. I have tried multiple teen sites and find myself bored with the solo scenes of these models who don’t even give me the idea they know what they’re even doing. It could be nerves or shyness, but that’s the hate side of it for me. When you put two or three (a lot of these scenes have more than 2 females) females together you at least get a little more sensuality and even aggressiveness from them.
There is some inconsistency from scene to scene. I don’t know if they maybe alternate producers or writers, but some of the scenes are so good they make some of the other scenes seem poor. One of the best scenes I have seen is their newest one. It is two college young women watching a movie and they decide to masturbate together. I think they could have stopped there and the scene would have been great. Instead, it turns into a lesbian scene where the action doesn’t replace the eroticism lost from them masturbating together. I am being critical of a job I wouldn’t want to have. I wouldn’t want to decide this is when you all are going to stop being innocent and become horny nymphos. That scene is stuck in my head. They started out, believably nervous about even masturbating together, then 10 minutes later, they were in full 69 and going at it like pros. I haven’t been in that situation so I don’t know if it would progress that quickly.
The models are very pretty and cute. There’s some ethnic diversity. The production is very good. The stories are believable. The sex is even believable, but not to the level that I would believe these are real lesbians. I’m not even for sure that’s what they want you to believe. The scenes rely more on tease, seduction, which would be more in the realm of bicurious or even straight becoming bicurious.
The video quality is close to as good as I think you can get. They have downloads from 160p up to 1080p on all 468 scenes, with around 40-50 of the scenes having 4K. The most enjoyable part for me -- and it goes back to the young ages, is everything that happens before the pussy licking starts. The kissing, touching, and masturbating together, I like that style with these younger models. There are a few things I haven’t seen much of and those include strap-ons or tribadism. The writers could convince me the young models do not know about tribadism, but it does seem strap-ons with young models would be commonplace.
The site would score higher with more consistency. It jumps from three college young women being silly and playful to two college young women being serious and showing similar to real feelings of love. There’s the inconsistency of being near hardcore in one scene to softcore in the next. That may be subjective to me since it does give some variety, but it does seem like the women I want to see do the hardcore, stick with the softcore and the ones I want to see doing softcore do the more hardcore scenes. That definitely is subjective and should detract from the overall content. It’s a great lesbian site and the stories along with production and high technical quality push it up my list as one of the better lesbian sites. |
|
07-13-21 09:56am
Replies (0)
|
|
