| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
226
|
Squirt 4 Real
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Squirting looks real (well, as real as it gets)
-Easy navigation
-Acceptablee video quality
-Some g/g action, although most of it is solo
-Good site design |
| Cons: |
-No updates any more
-No live shows any more
-It's basically a solo site, although the title doesn't indicate so
-Jamie, the main model in the site, is ok, not extremely hot. But she really knows how to squirt
-Small archive (around 70 videos, no pics)
-Action gets repetitive and kind of forced after three or four videos
-Really pricy for the content it offers |
| Bottom Line: |
I got a membership to this site by accident, or by mistake: it was a pre-checked membership that I got when I joined Flashy Babes, without even noticing it. So I thought, now that I have it, let's try to enjoy it.
But the sad truth is, there isn't really that much to enjoy. The site features mainly just one girl (Jamie) who knows how to squirt enormous ammount of liquid, and sometimes makes scenes with other girls and tries to get them to squirt. And even if she gets it, it most of the time doesn't look erotic, but rather mechanic, as if she was squeezing them more than trying to make them cum.
A huge con for this site is that it isn't active any more: the last video update was added in 2008, and the last live show (which was probably one of the highlights for becoming a member) was in 2007, so there can be no hopes of new content being added any time soon.
It's funny that the site has a section on Female Ejaculation, which tries to be kind of scientific, with graphs and all. But it's not anything that you can't get for free elsewhere, and it's not really what you want to get in a porn site.
My bottom line: don't join this site. It may have been fun around 2007, when you got to see live squirting action, but now it's just no worth it. |
|
08-28-10 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
227
|
Squirting Files
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some of the best "squirters" (Cytherea, Flower Tucci) are here
-Girls do squirt "something"
-The site is updated every week
-Good video quality and different streaming and download options
-Pictures in .zip files |
| Cons: |
-Archive is quite small (94 sets right now)
-Few to no extras or bonus content
-Not all models are equally hot |
| Bottom Line: |
When I wrote my previous (now expired) review, I said that the site was not updating any more (there is in fact a two year gap between July 2007 and May 2005 in which the site was not updated); well, since then, 21st Sextury has brought this site back to live, and it is now regularly updated with a new set every week.
I won't get into the discussion of whether squirting is real or not; whether it's cum, urine or any other vaginal fluid. Girls in this sets do squirt some colorless liquid, as a result of vaginal and G-spot stimulation: that's all I can say for sure. And for me that's enough.
This site is an exception in the 21st Sextury network, in that it includes sets by well-known American actresses like Cytherea, Aubrey Addams or Flower Tucci, and not so much by the usual Eastern European models that are its trademark. (Maybe Eastern European girls do not know how to squirt?).
This site is, in general, good-not-great, even if you are into squirting videos: the models are not stunning; the archive is still not that big, and you get no bonus content or extras. Also, some of the models don't look like they are having that a great time: it is more like they are being squeezed than "pleasured".
I wouldn't quite recommmend this site as an individual site; as a part of a network, it's ok, but we all know that 21st Sextury can do better; and that there are other better squirting sites out there... |
|
01-09-11 09:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
228
|
Squirting Files
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Squirting is hot
-Some of the classics (Cytherea, Flower Tucci...) are there
-The quality is good |
| Cons: |
-Very few videos
-Very pricy for the content
-Slow updates (chunked video system)
-Few extras |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a member of this site thanks to the loyalty bonus membership offered by Sweetsophiemoone.com. And if I weren't, I mean, if I had paid 29$ or more to enter this site, I would be very pissed off right now. I mean, yes, there are some squirting videos and pictures, with some of the most famous squirting actresses (Cytherea is the queen at that), but that's it. The collection includes less than 30 videos, there are no other extras, and you will have to wait for over a week if you want to see a full new video set.
If you are dying to see new squirting sets, or if you are a millionaire who doesn't care about money, then you may as well join, and you will find some quality content; but if you, like me and like almost everybody else, have to carefully choose which sites you become a member of, then don't choose this one.
Follow-Up:
Apparently the site is not being updated any more: no new updates since July 2007, and no news for at least more than a month. Do not join this site unless you don't mind it being a zombie! |
|
09-27-07 02:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
229
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
A while ago I had some problems with them too. For some reason, my account was blocked and I had to email them to solve the problem. Then I tried opening a new account, and when they discovered that it was me they unblocked the old account and told me to "stop opening new accounts". A bit rudely, if you ask me...
In general, customer support at Streamate is really good (probably the best I've seen in this adult business), but they do seem to have occasional problems with their billing department...
|
01-09-12 12:10pm
|
Reply
230
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
Same thing happened to me once. Entered the free chat, said "hello, how are you", she said "horny" or something like that, I said "good", she said "fuck you" and permanently kicked me off. I don't remember the name of the girl, otherwise I would post it here for "publicity".
All in all, girls are quite nice. I specially love chatting with SexyAngel1 or Lolli, they always have a smile on their face even if you tell them you are not taking them private that they for whatever reason. Others are more "straight to business" and will (temporarily) kick you out thee free chat if you don't seem ready to pay.
|
06-15-11 12:34pm
|
Reply
231
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
You probably know this already, but I'll say it anyway.
If you are logged in, when you make a search or choose a set of characteristics on the column to the left, and you get the results (the images of the girls with the yellow "online" label), if you pass the mouse over the image, a small video-screen will open which will let you see if the girl is really online; if she is doing a private session (and you are offered to join); if she is doing an exclusive session (in which case you may not join) or if she is taking a short break.
Also, this option has another advantage: that you can peek at the girls to see how good-looking they are and how they interact with other users, without entering the chat (and allowing her to kick you out if you don't go into private, for example).
|
03-24-11 06:42am
|
Review
232
|
Streamate.com
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Hundreds (thousands?) of girls from all over the world
-All girls have video and chat, some also have sound (music and/or voice)
-You can peek at the girls for free (until they kick you out of their chat)
-Some girls are stunning
-Some famous actresses use this service (Anita Dark, for instance)
-Billing is clear and efficient
-You can set a maximum daily spending limit
-Customer service is amazingly good |
| Cons: |
-Not all girls are equally good-looking (in fact some are utterly unattractive)
-Most girls don't respect their announced schedule (if they have one), and at some hours there are very few online
-Navigation and search options could be improved
-Prices are quite high and variable
-Quality of videos is also different from one girl to another
-Almost no sense of community (their loss...) |
| Bottom Line: |
I recently discovered this site because I follow Anita Dark on Twitter and she uses this platform for her webcam shows. And I got hooked quite rapidly. You have access to an amazingly big catalog of women (some are stunning; others are just ok; others are straight ugly) who are ready to satisfy most of your needs and requests.
As a new customer, the best idea is probably to peek into the free version of some of the hot girls' chats, adding the ones you like to your favs, and then returning to them for private or exclusive sessions when you feel like it. Some girls allow you to chat with them for free for a while, traying to lure you into their pvt webcam sessions; others are quite direct: the first thing one girl said to me was "pvt or leave, bb". In my opinion, that's a huge marketing mistake: even if the girl was quite hot, I left :)
My experience with this site so far has been quite good: after navigating the catalog for a while (which can be a bit difficult, because search options are a bit confusing) I chose a bunch of girls (my favorite two are lucky.star and SexyAngel1, by the way) and started chatting with them. After seeing that she were nice enough, and absolutely stunning, I decided to go for a private session with lucky.star. I had already told her what I wanted, and she went straight to business. I was one satisfied customer.
The most important con of this site is its price. The price per minute in private sessions vary from 1.75€ to 3.50€ (judging from what I have seen so far), so if you stay for a while with a model, the bill can get a bit steep. You can also set a maximum limit per day (25€ is the lowest), but even so, you could end up expending 750€ in one month... :) You also have to pay extra to access some "celebrity chats" or to watch previously recorded sessions of some girls. It's all about the money, you know...
I also have to add a word about their customer service, which, at least for me, has been excellent. I had a problem with my account; a live support pop-up window opened up in the site itself, and somebody from their customer service help me solve it; I also had a couple of questions about ratings and video quality, and I recieved an immediate email response from them. Way to go, guys! |
|
03-23-11 07:14am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
233
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
09-02-12 11:43am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
234
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
I am also a big (huge!) fan of Sophie Moone: when I started watching porn in the internet she immediately caught my eye (and everything else) and I've followed her work since, being a member of all her "official sites" and most of the other sites that offer her content.
For me the worst thing about "Sweet Sophie Moone II: the return of Sophie" is the excessive ammount of bonus and backstage content they offer. With only 4 updates a month, I feel that they should make sure that at least 3 of them are real action sets. In fact, I think it would be more fair if all 4 sets were real action, and the bonus sets came, well, as real bonuses inbetween.
As for the other "complaints", it's true that Sophie is not a teenager any more, but I think she still looks gorgeus (I wouldn't kick her out of my bed, for sure :P), and I don't really miss her b/g scenes. But I do have a sense of inauthenticity in most of her most recent sets, like she is just going through the moves and not really interested in what she is doing.
In any case, I know that I will at least once more join this site sometime next year...
|
10-23-10 02:10am
|
Reply
235
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yes, I suppose you are right, probably Sophie Moone doesn't have the implication (or the energy) she had 10 years ago when she started; but I did expect to get at least 1 good (and by good I mean "exclusive" and "not-backstage") video per week featuring her. I think that is the minimum that you can expect from a site like this.
Anyway, answering your question, even if this site wasn't part of the 21st Sextury network, I think I would probably have joined for at least 1 month at some point, because I would hate to feel that I may be missing some great new sets of Sophie, even if I also knew that I would probably be dissapointed by the actual sets... :P
|
09-04-10 06:47am
|
Comment
236
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
09-04-10 02:35am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
237
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
06-23-10 03:45am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
238
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
03-10-10 04:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
239
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, it's a bit strange that she quit and the come back just after some months (I don't know if it has been even a year). But hey, who are we to judge. Me, I am really happy she decided to come back, and I would really hate it if this happened to be just a marketing strategy from 21st Sextury...
|
02-12-10 03:47pm
|
Comment
240
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
02-12-10 01:35am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
241
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
She has been my favorite model for ages, since I first saw her in Hot Legs and Feet. I am really sorry to see her go, but well, I wish her the very best now in her out-of-biz life. She will surely be missed!
|
05-21-09 03:48am
|
Comment
242
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
|
09-18-07 08:28am
Replies (1)
|
Review
243
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Sophie Moone herself: she is cute, she has a body to die for, and she also seems nice and funny in the backstage videos
-The video quality is great
-The site also offers a lot of information about Sophie: travel log, diary, "moment of the week" picture...
-The content of the videos is as varied as it can be in this type of "personal" sites: there's solo sets, GG sets and even some BG sets, although Sophie doesn't do hardcore any more.
-The support centre works properly |
| Cons: |
-The videos are updated in small pieces, so only two sets are added weekly.
-The trial membership is tricky: you won't be able to access the whole videos or other extra features.
-There's almost no direct contact with Sophie -via chat, via forum. She does answer to almost all the emails she recieves.
-It's a bit expensive for the number of updates it offers |
| Bottom Line: |
Sophie Moone has become one of the most famous and well credited adult models in Europe, having worked with directors like Viv Thomas and Andrew Youngman, so it was obvious that she would get her own site some time. She has done a good job with the site, though: apart from the good quality videos, which is what you expect from this kind of site, there's a lot of information about her, and a lot of fun stuff to watch (bonus videos, backstage videos, etc.) She also tries to make the scenes as varied as she can, with a little bondage here, a little foot fetish there, some BG action for a change...
There are only a few things I would change about this site: first of all, I don't like that parcial video updates, in which you have to wait a week or more to see the whole video. That's only a way of hiding that you are only making two updates a week -at most-, and I find it annoying; also, I think a forum would be a nice suplement to the information we already have. And I really think they should change the trial membership, or at least explain clearly what you will and what you won't get with it.
This site is a must-see for all Sophie fans, and all of those who are not specially into Sophie -yet- will soon discover why she is so well known.
Follow-Up:
After some months of membership and a bit of meditation, I have decided to lower the rating of this site from 95 to 90. The rythm with which updates are added is definitely too slow, and although I enjoy the loyalty bonus memberships, thay also come slowly, and I only like 3 or 4 of the sites I have visited so far. Sophie Moone lovers will love this site anyway, specially if it's their "first time" |
|
01-11-07 03:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
244
|
Trisha Uptown
(0)
|
|
03-15-09 11:36am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
245
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
You are welcome :)
|
01-19-11 10:23am
|
Reply
246
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Ok, it could be a useful distinction. For me, almost any solo action is softcore; most lesbian action (specially kinky stuff excluded) could be midcore; and any boy/girl action with penetration etc., hardcore; anyway, thanks for commenting :D
|
07-28-10 12:50pm
|
Review
247
|
Twistys
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Amazing ammount of content: many more pictures than videos, but that's quite usual, isn't it...
-Good update rythm: two-three picture sets and two videos a day
-Really beautiful girls (mostly American big-titted actresses, but also some European cuties)
-Easy navigation and different search options
-Good picture and video quality, specially in recent sets
-No download limits
-Good pricing, considering the content they offer
-Full trial membership (I received a special 1$ discount for "old customers: best deal ever). |
| Cons: |
-Downloads are at times a bit slow
-Content may be too softcore for some viewers, specillay after a while (and the hardcore part of the site is really minimal)
-Not all content is exclusive
-Some company ads, not too annoying though |
| Bottom Line: |
I rejoined this site thanks to a trial membership offer that I received in my email, for being and "old customer": 1$ for three days, renewable at 14.95$ a month. Probably the best invested buck in my whole life.
The archive is huge. That's probably Twisty's most salient quality. Being one of internet's "classics", it has so much content (more picture sets than vids, but that's quite usual, isn't it) that you would need months to download and browse it all -specially considering that download speeds aren't always the best. The quality of the videos varies depending on their release date, newer videos being offered in three different qualities.
The models/actresses are mostly American girls with huge tits -a lot of them, fake-, but you will also find a handful of sets by some of our favorite European models, such as Sophie Moone, Eufrat, Eve Angel or Nella (here as Nellie Hunter). Most girls are absolutely stunning, so no complains there.
The only possible dissapointment about Twistys is that it is too softcore, or too regularly softcore: most sets and vids are solo masturbation sets, very beautifully lit, acted, filmed and edited. This is great, but it can get a little too repetitive once you've watched it a dozen times with a dozen different girls, and the bunch of lesbian or hardcore videos available are just not enough to balance this feeling.
But this is just to say something bad about a good site: good in ammount of content, in quality of pics and videos, in model selection and even in price, if you are lucky enough to get a discount (PU's offer or other one). It could be a good holiday idea, to get a Twistys one month membership and download as much as you can... |
|
07-28-10 11:43am
Replies (7)
|
Rating
248
|
Virtually Jenna
(0)
80.0
|
No Review.
|
01-18-07 03:11am
|
Comment
249
|
Virtually Jenna
(0)
|
|
01-18-07 03:11am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
250
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
|
05-08-07 07:59am
Replies (1)
|
|
