| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Nicoletta Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I could understand this better if there was not both a Mature and Milf designation. In my opinion Milf really should mean 28-35 yrs old, basically motherhood age (at least in the modern era or last 40 yrs).
Mature out to mean anything past 36 yrs old, or beyond normal childbearing age. Now I could see this site being under the Milf category-although I still think she's a bit too young for that-but no way is she mature.
If she's now mature, when was she a "Milf", at 23?
This matters, because when I go searching for new "mature" sites I don't feel like wading through a bunch of 25-26yr olds to get to what I'm looking for.
It's almost like saying a chic like Melissa Midwest is "mature", I'd bet anything she's around the same age by now.
|
07-31-10 10:22pm
|
Comment
177
|
Nicoletta Nude
(0)
|
|
07-31-10 05:23pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
178
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I think the name of the site "Only Tease" is meant to be a hint.
I know I'm stating the obvious, but if so, I'm not quite sure what it is your hoping for.
Maybe you should try the other site "Only Opaques". Not sure but maybe that one has full nudity.
|
11-26-10 02:39am
|
Reply
179
|
Playful Coeds
(0)
|
Reply of
imagexxx's Reply
Would have to side with the webmaster here; I thing you are missing the point of the site. If you were looking for a site with a bunch of hot porn chicks, you probably should have gone elsewhere. When judging an amateur site you should usually base it on how it compares with it's peers or other amateur sites. The strength of a good amateur site should be that it provides access to a particular niche, or to girls that can't be found elewhere. When I had a look over PlayfulCoeds; I have to admit, I hadn't seen any of these girls elsewhere (and they looked alright for amateurs).And they are providing a particular voyeuristic niche that you aren't going to get elsewhere. As far as the video quality, that is fair game enough, while many amateur sites do not have the resources to provide the vid quality of high powered network sites, the vids should at least be passable. As far as that is concerned, looking at the trailers, the vid quality could be a bit better. It's not horrible for an amateur site, but I've seen better even from others.
At the same time these guys are only asking 14.95 a month with a full access trial. I thought you could have given them some more points for that. All in all I see the webmasters vision here and if the vids improve like he says it will, they may have a winner.
|
02-28-08 10:50am
|
Reply
180
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Agree %100; a while back I made a negative comment about this site but they have since stepped their game up considerably. They could still use some work in the areas of vid quality, more pics, zip sets and so on, but progress takes time.
Nonetheless, considering how underrepresented the BBW market is at this time, these guys have certainly placed themselves near the top in this category.
Hats Off.
|
12-11-08 11:56pm
|
Reply
181
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
jonesyboy's Review
These sites have decent content, but they are just another porn company that failed to keep up with the times in terms of quality. I've never been a member to any of these sites, but I was considering it strongly some years back, too bad to see they failed to evolve. Their price now is actually an increase; go figure. I guess their strategy now is to lure some fools in with the full access trial, then hope they forget to cancel so they can hit them with that ridiculous 35.00 charge. I guess desperate times call for desperate measures.
|
02-19-08 10:38pm
|
Reply
182
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I've been a member here many times, last time was early this year. I can't really speak to the negative reviews, but I've never had any problems personally with them.
Also I'm not sure why people have said they are no longer updating, my experience has been they have always updated every day or at least several times a week. They have never hid their update schedules and the dates are openly visible.
Also never had any problems with billing, they've used Epoch for at least the past year who is reputable biller. When I wanted to quit it was just like any other site.
Finally to the poster who mentioned that they get rid of certain sites completely that is a legitimate gripe. Although let's face it these guys basically are about taking chances as far as site concepts are concerned and there should be at least some recognition of that. When you take chances as they have done it's possible that you will sometimes fail miserably as perhaps a site like sleep creep had done.
Porn is a business at the end of the day and perhaps sleep creep had such little interest that it didn't make sense to keep even the archive intact. However it's not like they advertise sleep creep on their front page and when you get in it is not there (at least not when I checked).
I actually still have a link for this site at $9.95 a month to anyone interested (among a few others) send me an email.
|
07-31-10 05:47pm
|
Reply
183
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Facial Abuse.
|
05-21-10 04:30pm
|
Reply
184
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
You could have just used work around i mentioned around a couple years ago.
Just enter the wrong cc expiration (a future date), and it will take you to Epoch (the secondary biller) You may have to do it twice to trigger.
I've done it before (a while back) with RK and still it often with Brazzers.
|
05-17-19 10:40pm
|
Reply
185
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I still don't understand why they decided to go with a different pricing model than even Brazzers, who who owns them. You can get Brazzers for 9.99 practically anywhwere and it includes downloads. They are the only MindGeek site that prices like this that i'm aware of.
|
01-13-19 06:51am
|
Reply
186
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
They used to use epoch as their biller, but since they got bought out by mindgeek (company behind Brazzers) they've used Probiller, who i've personally not had problems with (though it's been awhile) but have seen enough horror stories to know they aren't completely legit either. I was planning on going back but not now.
|
02-14-18 04:06pm
|
Reply
187
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks Khan for the reply. I may sign up in the next few days.
|
03-04-12 10:51am
|
Reply
188
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I understand Messmer. I figured you might reply before I finished since you are always pretty fast and seem to be here quite a bit.
Nonetheless I'm a bit concerned about the $9.99 recurring since when I just went to sign up it said "$9.99 for 1 month". Meaning they might blindside us with price spike next month.
Didn't you just recently get burned by bangbros on something like this. Keep in mind I think they basically use the same biller.
I wouldn't mind confirmation from PU staff on the recurring part.
|
03-03-12 07:55pm
|
Reply
189
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I was about to say the 10gb is more than enough but then I realized some 1080p files can be upwards of 3gb. Still a good deal if you like the site though. I may be going back myself.
|
03-03-12 07:27pm
|
Reply
190
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
As a current member of the site I can say there is a way to sort the models by name alphabetically (I just re-checked).
Anyway as to the substance of your comment, this is definitely not where you'd go for deep throat type material. (I know you said that).
For that I'd suggest Facial Abuse, or checking out some of the older DVD's from Extreme Associates/Armageddon Entertainment called "Slap Happy". (Especially "Slap Happy two" which is a somewhat rare film now). Also "Young Throats".
You may be familiar already with the sites I've just mentioned (and they are pretty extreme) but to be honest I don't think there's much else that I would consider true deep throat.
|
12-02-10 04:02pm
|
Reply
191
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I've always felt that Reality Kings had the best pictures amongst the major North American sites. That has changed as anyone who has downloaded recent sets from Brazzers can attest. (Not trying to toot Brazzers horn as I know they are not very popular, but this is the truth).
However they are still very good. Although I don't know the specs.
|
11-14-10 11:51am
|
Reply
192
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I think such a pricing model would be dead on arrival. It could only work if:
1. There were no pirating. The only advantage to the current model we have over is going completely pirate bulk and convenience. Individual pricing models takes this away, and forces consumers to constantly be thinking about there wallet-unlike now where it's a one time transaction and enjoy. This would only make the pirates more profitable as some file hosting sites are paying both for uploads and new subscribers. Once the typical pirate/"independent sales partner" were to purchase a movie one time he could still post it on the forums and reap even greater rewards. Plus the average Joe could still find the content via the tube sites.
2. All and I mean basically all the sites agreed on the same model. Otherwise the sites that use the current model would hold the advantage of both bulk and convenience.
Individual pricing models only work for the music industry because of the advent of the ipod, and peoples desire to listen to music 'on the go'. People don't watch porn 'on the go', they do so in front of their computers, or occasionally on their cell phone in a bathroom stall.
This discussion would be better taken back to the forum as it's gotten a bit off the topic of Reality Kings.
|
09-28-10 03:21pm
|
Reply
193
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Messmer do you say that they removed the complaints! I'll probably be back (at the $9.95 price) in a few months, but as I've said, RK to me is the most Corporate and insensitive of them all.
|
09-28-10 11:17am
|
Reply
194
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm no longer a member messmer,(although I may come back soon, using my $9.95 link I hope you were able to take advantage of.).Although it does not surprise me at all. Reality Kings to me is the most corporatized of all of the big name North American sites. (Brazzers at least has a forum where complaints are voiced and moderators often give the company's side).
Nonetheless it doesn't bode well when you have so many big names struggling (relates to the forum thread about Scoreland). Then again for a site like Reality Kings it's probably that some girl just missed a shoot and they had to fill in an update from somewhere out of there ass.
|
09-27-10 01:03pm
|
Reply
195
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
You think they are recycling content?
|
09-27-10 10:53am
|
Reply
196
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
I already took advantage of this deal on another site a while back, I'd say it's worth it. RK's backlog and diversity is more than worth $10 a month. Not my favorite site by any means but certainly worth the price here.
|
05-21-10 04:28pm
|
Reply
197
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Oddly enough I've been a member at least 4 or 5 times on and off and never had a problem. Sorry man.
At least he uses CCBill who always seems to have their act together.
|
12-30-09 10:25am
|
Reply
198
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I've personally never had a problem with any of the Score sites, and yes I was just recently a member of Score HD. I think the main reason they don't list the billing company on TBP is because they use so many different ones.
For instance, I think I've been a member of Score HD twice, the first time in December it was through Epoch, the second time earlier this year it was through Net billing. I've now canceled Score HD (not because it isn't good). However I still have a running membership to Scoreland which is billed through CCbill (from my checking account)
Score is a pretty reputable company, however you do need to be wary of the cross sells when signing up.
|
04-12-10 06:52pm
|
Reply
199
|
Score Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Reply
Yeah you're right, although I don't think she made more than one or two from what I saw. She probably had a change of heart sometime back then right before she retired.
|
10-31-16 10:46pm
|
Reply
200
|
Score Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
Via Paxton was a model from the late 90's that refused to do video. I remember reading about it in the magazine. Something about her thinking that posing in magazines were glamorous but appearing in a video, even soft core, made her a slut.
Makes no sense but it was also a slightly different time. Back then, Score was still mostly about the magazine with the website being secondary.
|
03-27-15 03:28pm
|
