| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
French Doll.fr
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Melanie is hot!
+ Photography is excellent IMHO
+ Pictures are HD with 2000 pixels on the long side and available as ZIP files
+ Subscription is quite cheap at € 10 per month
+ Unique content
+ "BeMyDoll" (tm) feature that allows to order personal sets or videos for € 30 per set or vid |
| Cons: |
- Melanie is the only model on this site even though the "BeMyDoll" (tm) feature would be nice with other girls from Petites Parisiennes too :-)
- Update schedule is not clear
- Site would need more content and regular updates
- Navigational features are poor
- No hardcore content not even insertion of dildos or vibes.
- An error message regarding the Microsoft Visual C++ library pops up every time I enter the site using Firefox this for sure has to do with some video playback funtion integrated within the site. Beware as this sometimes might crash your browser. |
| Bottom Line: |
Even though two normal updates per week are guaranteed I'm waiting for new pictures for quite some time now.
What can I say other than that there are about 32 picture series and about 20 movies available. All can be downloaded in a few hours even with a slow connection.
The "BeMyDoll" feature sounds great but in order to make me use it some more clothes and acessoires would be needed. Only one mini skirt isn't enough :-(
This site has to come from the guy that does Petites Parisiennes as well and therefor quality of content is great but as written above it needs more and regular updates - just as promised in the intro.
I was thinking about giving 70 points but to be honest 69 is a nice number and more like it. If the maker would invest a little more effort this would be a great site if you like the girl of course. I like the girl and wish that her site gets better because then I'll surely come back and order my personal set of pictures *wink* |
|
11-12-09 11:43am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
152
|
French Doll.fr
(0)
|
|
11-06-09 09:18am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
153
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Honestly spoken this is nonsense from an economical point of view. The content already made enough money throughout the years and to post-process ist again costs more time and money than it will actually earn. I'd say that most users will go for the newest stuff only. I may be different because I value some of the older scenes much higher in terms of entertainment than the new "smut" they offer :-).
|
05-28-10 10:03am
|
Reply
154
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Hope you like it too. I'm interested to read what you think about this site.
|
05-25-10 10:30pm
|
Reply
155
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
I used to have some connection problems yesterday which caused my downloads in Firefox to stop. After a restart of Firefox the downloads resumed without any problem.
Cheers,
Smut
|
05-24-10 08:47am
|
Review
156
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ this is the original site for machines fucking gorgeous girls
+ lots of content going back until September 2000
+ forums for interaction between users and the team of kink.com
+ newest movies are good quality and a maximum of HD with 1280x720 pixel resolution. Videos come in several formats and sizes.
+ now 3 updates peer week
+ mostly sexy models that really seems to enjoy the machine fucking
+ amateur girl Fridays bring new and fresh faces into the world of fucking machines
+ videos normally start with an interview section and end with a conclusion about the girl's experience about the shoot
+ High download speeds
+ members get discounts on other kink.com sites (except The Upper Floor and Device Bondage) |
| Cons: |
- older content isn't good enough for today's standard (but still unique and fun to watch)
- model bios could often need more details and sometimes you won't find all scenes when searching for a particular model
- would love to see full ZIPs for all fotos and a better resolution than the current 1200 pixels on the long side
- most of the machines are very noisy and it keeps me wonder how a girl can cum riding such a loud monster
- download managers won't work |
| Bottom Line: |
If you can cope with the cons mentioned above the site really offers interesting content for those curious enough to see girls being fucked by machines. Ever since this site started they tried to improve quality of content.
I used to be a member some years ago but wasn't satisfied back then. The picture quality around 2005 was poor and the video quality also didn't give me a thrill. In any case this stuff only works as video content. The stills are nice but the actual action is missing what makes it not worth if you are only interested in picure series.
Sometimes it's hard for the girls to keep the machines under control. The dildos slip out and mostly it's only possible to get into action again by stopping the machines to insert the dildos again.
The best experiences came from the amateur Friday updates. The girls are mostly fresh faces that seem to 100% get of while being fucked with machinery. To see them being completly exhausted right after they've experienced this for the first time is worth the money alone.
By the way it's nice to see girls of different ethnicities being shot for fucking machines if only the wouldn't almost only concentrate on girls below 30 years of age. I'd like to see a MILF or maybe a GILF type of girl from time to time.
I experienced very high download speeds with all kink.com sites but unfortunately my download manager won't work. Because of the large size of the videos (up to more than one GB) a fast internet connection is needed.
If you are curious I would recommend to give this site a try. I'm sure you won't be dissappointed. |
|
05-23-10 06:10am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
157
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Review
[quote]
+ Scenes are split up but able to download in 1 Zip file. (saves lots of time)
[/quote]
I guess that's new because I can remember that I always had to jump from page to page and download a ZIP file for the contents of one page. Thanks for letting me know because I'd really like to go back to Fucking Machines but this was an annoyance when I first joined them.
Cheers,
Eddie
|
12-28-07 07:33am
|
Reply
158
|
Fuckslut License Test
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Being from Germany I have to say that this is also in my opinion a funny conclusion but if you like that it might be worth to mention. Please don't forget that many german musicians are being stars in english speaking countries too - at least if they sing in german or have that funny german accent :-)
Oh, and thanks for this review ace!
p.s. don't forget to come back next week in order to hear Ingrid the Hun say "F... mich hart!" or for you english speaking fellow pervs "F... me hard!" :o) SCNR
|
11-16-09 10:47am
|
Reply
159
|
Geek Girls Online
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
Sounds great! And now I'm sure that I'll give it a try sometime in the near future. $10 is not that much and I'd like to see more from a few of the girls shown there :-)
Geek, geek hooray!
|
01-04-08 01:56pm
|
Reply
160
|
Gia Licious
(0)
|
Reply of
boredsurfer's Review
Uh, not exactly my cup of tea but I have to admit that some of the TS girls shown on the DVD boxes which you can see in her blog have pretty faces and nice bodies. Well, except for the fact that there's something which disturbs me where I'd normally expect a fanny with huge lips.
Strange enough the last entry in the blog is from August 2007.
|
12-30-07 05:05am
|
Comment
161
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
09-29-10 08:36pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
162
|
Girls Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Sorry to hear that you lost 40 bucks joining this site. To me this sounds like a real rip-off and it's good that you warn us not to experience the same.
Thanks,
Eddie
|
12-06-08 12:40am
|
Review
163
|
Golden Feet
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ exclusive and unique fetish content (see text)
+ Sarah is one gorgeous mature amateur
+ over 4 years of content or >340 picture series and 33 videos
+ regular updates on Sunday
+ ZIP files for the newest sets |
| Cons: |
- some navigational issues
- video quality could be better though it is improving
- older picture sets contain large and disturbing watermarks |
| Bottom Line: |
Lady Sarah is a very gorgeous woman being +50 and she is into several fetishs like foot fetish, foot jobs, nipple play, bj, g/g and b/g including dildo penetration, multiple strange insertions (like rhubarb or asparagus) intimate piercings, watersports (watch her pee and you will know how much), enema, role play etc.
The picture sets are unique and often shot in exclusive locations. Some sets have been shot in a whorehouse, a swinger club, her private playroom, on beaches, in her Finca in Spain, hotel rooms etc. Sarah will always wear exclusive lingerie or elegant dresses and matching heels. She often appears together with some of her friends or admirers.
Image sizes vary over time. The oldest sets from 2004 have a very low resolution but newer sets have 1,024 pixel on the long side for portray and 1,300 pixels for landscape orientation. The new videos are 640x480 wide and have an acceptable quality (keep in mind that this is an amateur site).
The site's design itself is plain and the navigation bar behaves strange when you use Firefox as your favourite browser. Galleries open in a new tab with a list of thumbnails in a frame on the bottom of this tab and the picture in a larger frame above.
I'm happy to see that the watermarks are now of relative normal size and that ZIP files are available for newer sets. This is something I asked the webmaster to do because I think it's a must nowadays.
For anyone heavily interested in foot-fetish or general fetish stuff as written above this site is really worth a try. I joined this site for the 5th or 6th time just to be able to write this review and I'm happy to see that the site gets better with time. |
|
12-07-08 04:50am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
164
|
Golden Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Still no news but that's because I didn't have a lot of time in the last 2 1/2 months. I got back to Sarah today but only to make her aware that I will give her some feedback soon. So it'll still take some time before I can write my final review and besides I haven't been able to take a look at any of the last 10 or more updates :-(
|
03-23-08 08:03am
|
Comment
165
|
Golden Feet
(0)
|
|
01-03-08 11:34am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
166
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Strange as I haven't seen this mosaic stuff. I've been watching samples for many picture series and haven't seen anything like this but sweet asian pubes instead.
|
11-08-09 10:58am
|
Reply
167
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks! I guess that I'll put that site on my list of must see pleasure providers.
|
11-08-09 04:05am
|
Reply
168
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
I just took a quick look at the models on the preview pages and I'm mighty impressed to see that all of them are real beauties! As I'm a pic dude I'd like to know about the resolution of pictures in the member's area and it would be of interest to know if they offer ZIP files for the whole series :-)
Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Smut
|
11-08-09 03:57am
|
Reply
169
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Thanks for bringing this site to my attention. I'd really like to read a full review on Graphis as the sheer amount of content offered alone seems to be worth a try!
And I didn't even speak about the fact that those models on the tour pages look very nice :-)
|
11-08-09 03:42am
|
Reply
170
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Hi Man,
I'd say go for 1by-day as Jenny Noel is real *hot*. She has 2 lesbo (incl. peeing), 1 b/g and a casting scene which shows her in her natural beauty. Also I guess you'll find more content that suits your need on 1by-day as they have lots of cuties to offer.
- Pricilla (guess you mean Priscilla?) * 1by-day archives 7 sets from 2004-05 * HOT 1 set with Pamela
- Belicia * 1by-day 1 set * 1by-day archives 1 set 2006 * HOT 4 sets
- Suzie Carina * 1by-day 5 set (mostly lesbo) * 1by-day archives 8 sets 2001-07 * HOT none
- Helena (Helena P.) * 1by-day none but advertised as coming soon * 1by-day archives 1 set 2002 * HOT none
- Nataly (the readhead I suppose) * 1by-day 2 sets * 1by-day archives 11 sets 2005-06 * HOT 1 peeing set
- Andy also known as Bretta * Nothing at all
|
12-30-07 08:21am
|
Reply
171
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Hi Elephant,
once again thanks for letting us know. I joined 1by-day last night and didn't see the scrolling text but maybe that's because I'm not using MSIE?
[quote]
Thank you for selecting a site! Have fun!
[/quote]
Anyhow the link was still there in "Customer Support" and I've chosen the kinky House of Taboo.
Cheers,
Eddie
|
12-30-07 05:37am
|
Reply
172
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Thanks! I was searching for this info as well because there's nothing mentioned in the last newsletter or anywhere else on the site. Guess I'll join tomorrow and surf for porn while other celebrate New Year's Eve *lol*
And now for something completely different ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinner_for_One or as one well-known musician said "You'll love it!"
|
12-29-07 10:30am
|
Reply
173
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
First of all thanks for making this comment. If you'd like to go for something different then I'd say get your pass for houseoftaboo because this is something that gives you a real thrill if you like the real kinky side of porn without being way too rude.
I once was a member shortly after they opened the site and I was a bit disappointed because of the lack of content but ... the quality was more than o.k.
B.t.w. I guess I'll join 1by-day and houseoftaboo before December 31st. This sounds like a real bargain to me :-)
|
12-29-07 08:21am
|
Comment
174
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
|
06-01-08 01:19am
Replies (9)
|
Comment
175
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
|
11-30-08 09:23pm
Replies (0)
|
