| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
Well if you are into Latex then it's really a shame because the update frequency for that niche is very low. As for the quality I can only say I liked it a lot even though it's not my favourite niche ;-)
|
03-22-08 06:09am
|
Comment
177
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
|
01-06-08 02:02am
Replies (2)
|
Review
178
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ great content and lots of tasty models
+ video quality has improved a lot since I was there for the last time (no DRM)
+ Image quality is now better and the newest sets are 2000pixels for the long side (which is an increase of about 400pixels)
+ ZIP files are now 1 per set conveniently downloadable from the first thumbnail page for each update |
| Cons: |
- image quality varies between acceptable and fantastic
- sometimes it's not exactly clear to me why a set is shown at HOT (e.g. Sasha shaving her legs)
- some broken or missing links
- in the members area there is no information given about the update schedule |
| Bottom Line: |
Content is divided into different sections like spanking, bondage, roleplay, latex fetish and watersports.
The navigational features are somewhat annoying because it's hard to keep track where you came from or to find specific content e.g. when searching for a special model. I found a broken link for one set with Laura M. and Nelli but was at least able to find that one on the spanking page. One set was split up into 3 subset which are scattered around in 2 different categories.
The worst thing is to not know when the site gets updated. This is a real nuisance as 1by-day for instance gets updated twice per day.
For some models information is missing and it would be nice to get a hint where you can find them on other DDF sites. Lucky enough I found at least chubby Laura M. and her massive 40F breast on DDF Busty.
The new videos offer good quality – though still not as excellent as the videos from ALS Scan for instance - but only for the picture itself as the audio tracks still seem to be a problem for those who record or edited the movies.
HOT offers a lot of different content but IMHO it still needs more to offer. It seems as if updates do now come more than once per week. I'll keep an eye on that and let you know as soon as I know more. The content itself is very good and I enjoy to see for instance Cloe getting fisted, Dorthy Black or Daria training their female slaves and not to forget to see pregnant Violet Blue being submissive. |
|
12-30-07 01:30pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
179
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
Reply of
submale2's Reply
Maybe because you are not speaking the truth :-)
|
12-05-09 01:53pm
|
Reply
180
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
Reply of
micdy's Reply
I'm not trying to demolish anyones opinion but this sites lives because we PUs trust each other and that is because we try to be as precise as possible when writing a review and not to be biased.
If you really like this site an want to promote it then the best way is to write an honest review and to give others some reasons to even think about checking out a site like this one.
This can be achieved in describing what you as one that joined the site found inside e.g. quantity and quality of content, technical details, facts about interactive elements.
Oh, and b.t.w. I don't think that your writing skills are bad. I'd only like to see a full review especially because you gave 100 points. That's an error a lot of newbies here at PU do so no objection against you personally :-)
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-04-09 11:27pm
|
Reply
181
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
Reply of
submale2's Reply
Besides of being the "gatekeeper" around here I also fancy to do what I like and not what others tell me. I guess the other PUs will have some fun reading our little conversation.
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-04-09 11:11pm
|
Reply
182
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
Reply of
micdy's Review
Hey, you should have read my reply to submale2 prior to posting another nonsense review of this site :o(
I guess that someone forced you and him to do this kind of stupid thing.
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-04-09 11:01pm
|
Reply
183
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
Reply of
submale2's News
... you need to join. and write a review that none of the veterans here will take serious :-(
Honestly spoken all I can say is that I'm glad that newbie reviews don't count towards a site's score. I'd advise you to look around a little read some other reviews and adjust yours accordingly. To give 100 points without having lots of pros and a lenghty bottom line is a joke but a very bad one.
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-04-09 10:13pm
|
Reply
184
|
I Love Pop Whore
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
I can confirm that via CCBill for Europeans there's a € 70 for 90 days option only :-/
|
11-10-09 11:33pm
|
Review
185
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ hirez pics 2000px on the long side downloadable as zips (see cons). Each series has about 80-100 pictures.
+ lots of different video formats available from basic mpg, QT to HDV - 1280 x 720 @ 4Mbit (WMV) plus Flash streams
+ videos are not documentary type of ones shot while the pictures have been taken (but have a similar script)
+ some great action including striptease, (multiple and weird) insertions, peeing, fisting but only g/g sets.
+ daily updates but only one video or picture series per day |
| Cons: |
- when using a download manager the original name of the zip/movie gets lost.
- strange navigation as after having found a special series there's no link back onto the model's main page. Categories for a series are listed but don't link to the overview page.
- only very basic model info
- only two simultaneous downloads but those were around >300KB/s each |
| Bottom Line: |
While having lots of lovely and erotic models available this site was not 100% my cup of tea. Hanna the main reason to join appeared only in some picture series and videos but I saw that she has a personal site which I may go for in the near future.
Some of the photo sets have strange illumination. Sometime there's too much light and then the model seems to be in the dark even though she's somewhere outside. Also they appear to soft to me a little more sharpness would be great!
The newer sets are real softcore. In the beginning there was quite some nice fisting stuff available but nowadays this is non-existing which is a bummer – the last fisting scene is dated from end of 2007
If you love cute young girls then this site is worth a look but beware that this is softcore only and that you will only see g/g scenes.
Oh, and also not forget that Europeans have to pay € 19,95 per month as the "special" price :-( |
|
06-16-08 06:20am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
186
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
|
06-05-08 11:07am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
187
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Thanks for the information but I'm not willing to pay for another download manager because I have one that works well with top sites like ALS Scan, ALS Angels and All Over 30.
You are right saying that we who pay have to have the chance to use such a tool. It's o.k. for me to limit the maximum number of connections per user but that's it. In my future reviews I'll make clear statements telling you if such a tool is working or not and any site blocking DL managers will get a not so good review.
To me it make absolutely no sense to block these tools as:
- paying customers get pissed if they have to start downloads manually or have to re-download stuff because no resume is possible
- other users get less bandwidth because of this
- the owners have to pay for more and unnecessary traffic.
|
05-25-08 10:17am
|
Comment
188
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
|
05-25-08 06:14am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
189
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Well I'd say that's a clever marketing strategy. The want to make you reconsider if you really want to cancel. I've seen that with other sites too but can't remember which ones. In the end when I decided to cancel I'm off :-)
But is that really worth an extra comment about this site?
Cheers,
Smut
|
03-31-08 10:19am
|
Reply
190
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Jep, that's not clear to me either. Thanks in advance for explaining this nbaby8.
B.t.w. is there a standard size for the pictures they offer? Looking at the previews I get different sizes but these are at least 1200px on the long side which is fantastic for a preview but I'd like to know if this is the best quality they offer.
Anyhow thanks for pointing me there as I didn't know the site before.
|
05-26-08 09:36am
|
Reply
191
|
Jay's POV
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
The previews are working for me. I didn't have any problems to view them.
|
11-27-08 10:36pm
|
Reply
192
|
Jess UK
(0)
|
Reply of
Stanley's Comment
Hi there,
maybe you should have waited until Tuesday after Easter. I'm not sure on how it is in the UK but here in Germany it's a long weekend because Friday was already off.
Mmmh, the size and quality of the preview pics is quite nice. Guess I'll keep an eye on that and maybe join some time in the near future.
Greetz,
Smut
|
03-23-08 12:57pm
|
Reply
193
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Missing model bios, somewhat strange navigation, no forums ... this site lacks some things but most of the content is fantastic. I already downloaded more than I thought in the first place and still I find cute models I overlooked yesterday :-)
What I like is the voting system even though the models that get me going don't make it to the top.
|
06-22-08 04:50am
|
Comment
194
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
|
06-21-08 03:04am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
195
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Review
Thanks man! I think I'll give it a try soon. Hope to read more reviews of you soon :).
|
06-17-08 12:40am
|
Comment
196
|
Lady Fiona
(0)
|
|
11-17-09 07:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
197
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
|
11-29-09 03:04am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
198
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
Marko's Reply
Hello Marko,
thanks for the reply. I've never been to your site before and I did get the old update page yesterday evening. Now I do see the current version and hell ... those ladies look quite nice :-)
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-29-07 06:24am
|
Comment
199
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
|
12-28-07 12:12pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
200
|
Little Summer
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Let me be third in the row :-) thanks for this excellent review.
|
11-03-09 10:18pm
|
