Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Only Blowjob
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I joined Only Blowjob about a year and a half ago. The concept is good but I ultimately didn't end up keeping much of the content and with the price and relatively low amount of content I don't think I'd ever join again.
|
06-20-09 06:15pm
|
Comment
177
|
Only Blowjob
(0)
|
|
02-09-08 10:46am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
178
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
|
11-05-08 01:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
179
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Reply
Thanks for the tip. I downloaded the Free Download Manager and it works great.
|
02-25-08 03:35pm
|
Reply
180
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
I've heard people talk about download managers but I've never used anything besides the built in browser functionality incorporated in IE and Firefox (i.e. right click, "Save link as...") -- which worked fine with Only Cuties BTW.
What are the advantages of the download software you use over using a browser?
|
02-19-08 08:27pm
|
Review
181
|
Only Cuties
(0)
86.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- The best video quality I've seen from a porn site so far. The 1280 x 720 movies look great on my 46" LCD.
- Beautiful ladies from Europe.
- Good amount of content for a young site.
- Daily content updates
- Good discount price through TBP.
- Nice site design & navigation |
Cons: |
- Not enough boy-on-girl movies.
- File downloads are large. (A necessary evil for the great quality.)
- A few but-her face models in the group. The hottest girls are in the lesbian and solo clips. |
Bottom Line: |
If you are a fan of Sapphic Erotica and you came here with the hopes that Only Cuties is the Sapphic Erotica models in hardcore scenes you will be about 90% satisfied with this site.
The 10% of disappointment comes from the boy-girl movies. The near perfect natural beauty of the SE girls is downgraded a bit with some of the models in the hardcore scenes. (Keep in mind I'm comparing them to the best models on SE -- they are still a step above the models on many other sites.)
The quantity of content is already large and varied for a young site. The # of updates is on par with SE and the quality of the video & pics is better than SE.
If you've never been to Sapphic Erotica don't worry about it, this is a great site! |
|
01-20-08 07:47am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
182
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I've looked at this site a couple times but haven't taken the plunge. How much of the video is just taping of photo shoots?
|
05-06-08 07:27pm
|
Reply
183
|
Orgasms Denied
(0)
|
Reply of
teaseme's Review
The site doesn't give much video to sample. Is the quality better than the sample trailer?
|
05-09-08 01:42pm
|
Comment
184
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
|
01-25-17 08:11am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
185
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
I'm more of a video guy myself but I like a good photography site on occasion. Good to know this site has the false leads with the videos and the sub-par photos. No thanks!
|
03-17-09 04:17am
|
Review
186
|
Phil Flash
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Frequent use of lotions and oil on bikini clad models.
+ Kendall Blaze shaking her booty around the stripper pole.
+ Really beautiful, young and fresh girls used as models.
+ Access to five bonus sites with subscription
+ One or two live Webcam shows a day. |
Cons: |
- Mostly non-nude video and photography
- Some sites in the network no longer updated
- Some movies just video of a photo shoot which can be boring.
- Goofy names for the models (i.e. Princess Blueyez).
- The login prompt appears too often as you navigate between the sites. |
Bottom Line: |
Though I tend to prefer my porn sites with full nudity and some type of sexual activity going on I decided to take a chance with Phil Flash after poking through the guest area of the site. Surprisingly I found it to be an enjoyable site. As I mention above the girls are really beautiful in the all-American, co-ed sort of way. Phil is creative enough with the costume and direction that the movies do not get boring (at least for a while) even without fucking, licking or blowing being involved. |
|
03-31-08 08:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
187
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
AleksandrOrlov's Review
According to the homepage of this site they have video up to "1920 x 1280". Oops!
|
04-19-10 03:39pm
|
Reply
188
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
senorim's Review
Hey senorim. Good review. Do you like the horizontal photos for the widescreen monitor?
I'm with you on the over the top American hardcore. The spitting turns me off especially.
|
06-28-08 11:28am
|
Review
189
|
Porn Access
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Good price through TBP ($14.95 a mo.)
- Huge amount of content
- Good video quality
- Ability to save favorites so you can revisit clips |
Cons: |
- The navigation is lacking. Breaking content out by "site" makes searching labor intensive.
- Little information on pornstars
- Non-exclusive content. If you've been a member of another DVD site lately you will probably see some familiar clips.
- A little heavy on the MILF/mature content for my tastes.
- Almost impossible to find content with the hot girls used in the site design! |
Bottom Line: |
A bit tough to navigate but worth it for the price. It's sort of like finding a shirt in one of the bins at TJ Maxx. There are a couple good ones in there but you have to sift through the pile to find it. |
|
01-19-08 03:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
190
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
The navigation does suck. If you like particular pornstars there's no way to search for them. sorting the content by "site" is a terrible way to browse.
|
01-19-08 03:31pm
|
Comment
191
|
Porn Mastermind
(0)
|
|
08-22-15 10:20am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
192
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
That's lame! Were you reimbursed for the money at least? If you canceled the same day you basically got nothing.
|
03-31-09 08:57pm
|
Comment
193
|
Punky GFs
(0)
|
|
05-13-10 03:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
194
|
Raven Riley
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Useful review. I like how you do a breakdown on the video types (b/g, g/g, solo, etc).
|
03-24-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
195
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Last time I was a member HD was only available for streaming. Now it seems they've switched to the opposite extreme. I haven't seen the 1080p vids from this site yet but I see your point with the file size.
|
10-04-10 07:57pm
|
Reply
196
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Good to know for future reference. Thanks!
|
07-08-10 06:34pm
|
Reply
197
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Huh, too bad I didn't try the mpegs before my subscription expired. I wonder if they would look better than the wmv's on my monitor?
|
07-08-10 02:28pm
|
Reply
198
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
It's still good, just not as good as it used to be. The super hot Euro girls are more sporadic and the guys that sub in for Mike (or whoever the original guy is) don't do as good a job directing the action.
|
07-08-10 01:46pm
|
Review
199
|
Reality Kings
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ HUGE amount of content (5K+ videos/2500K+ pics)
+ Web site easy to navigate.
+ I didn't actually confirm this fact but all network sites seem to be updating. If not, they all have enough content to at least be worth visiting.
+ Great variety in themes, women, etc.
+ There are common threads between network sites but there is enough difference between the sites so they can stand alone.
+ Some videos start off with a bit of a storyline (May be a con for some but I like it)
+ Great streaming videos quality. (Also, enough bandwidth to handle it.) |
Cons: |
- The biggest negative is the tease of having HD streaming video while the wmv download files are of lesser quality (720 x 404/1.4Mbps)
- I was a big fan of the Mike's Apartment movies a few years ago. Both the beauty of the models and the quality of the directing has gone down. |
Bottom Line: |
Reality Kings does not fail to impress! I joined up with the network when they had the $9.95 special. I didn't expect much but was pleasantly surprised it was such a high quality site with so much content.
RK is one of those networks that has something for everyone. They use North American, South American and Euro models depending on the site you're on. They also focus on some specialty niches like big natural breasts and MILFs.
Though they do have something for everyone I personally enjoyed most of the sites. Those who are not super picky will probably feel the same.
The site navigation is solid. You can browse by site or by model. You can also filter on categories. With so much content an advanced search feature would be helpful but what they have isn't bad.
I understand the marketing strategy of keeping the best quality video to streaming but it is annoying. I'm hoping it is merely a hard drive space issue and they are upgrading to provide the HD in other formats. |
|
07-08-10 10:00am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
200
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
bigmeat43's Review
I'm currently a member and not having issues with the streaming. It seems to be HD quality and it's downloading pretty quick. Are you having issues on a particular site within the network?
I'm with messmer, it's a network so how many sites do you expect?
|
05-25-10 02:15pm
|