Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Reality Kings (0)

Newbie 88* Goldfish (0) 07-08-10  10:00am            TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: + HUGE amount of content (5K+ videos/2500K+ pics) + Web site easy to navigate. + I didn't actually confirm this fact but all network sites seem to be updating. If not, they all have enough content to at least be worth visiting. + Great variety in themes, women, etc. + There are common threads between network sites but there is enough difference between the sites so they can stand alone. + Some videos start off with a bit of a storyline (May be a con for some but I like it) + Great streaming videos quality. (Also, enough bandwidth to handle it.) Cons: - The biggest negative is the tease of having HD streaming video while the wmv download files are of lesser quality (720 x 404/1.4Mbps) - I was a big fan of the Mike's Apartment movies a few years ago. Both the beauty of the models and the quality of the directing has gone down. Bottom Line: Reality Kings does not fail to impress! I joined up with the network when they had the $9.95 special. I didn't expect much but was pleasantly surprised it was such a high quality site with so much content. RK is one of those networks that has something for everyone. They use North American, South American and Euro models depending on the site you're on. They also focus on some specialty niches like big natural breasts and MILFs. Though they do have something for everyone I personally enjoyed most of the sites. Those who are not super picky will probably feel the same. The site navigation is solid. You can browse by site or by model. You can also filter on categories. With so much content an advanced search feature would be helpful but what they have isn't bad. I understand the marketing strategy of keeping the best quality video to streaming but it is annoying. I'm hoping it is merely a hard drive space issue and they are upgrading to provide the HD in other formats. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (7) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 slutty (0) Good review Goldfish, a pity Mikesparment is going downhill, that has always been one of my favorites. 07-08-10  01:37pm Reply To Message 2 Goldfish (0) REPLY TO #1 - slutty : It's still good, just not as good as it used to be. The super hot Euro girls are more sporadic and the guys that sub in for Mike (or whoever the original guy is) don't do as good a job directing the action. 07-08-10  01:46pm Reply To Message 3 slutty (0) REPLY TO #2 - Goldfish : Thanks for the info man. How were your download speeds? 07-08-10  01:54pm Reply To Message 4 messmer (Disabled) Good review, Goldfish. I really like this site because there usually is some sort of story line or introduction leading up to the sex itself. I also find that the new videos I download in mpeg format are crystal clear on my computer even when viewed in full screen and I see very little difference between the HD streaming and the downloadable version. Don't know why this would be, (graphics card?) but I'm content. As a matter of fact RK's highest quality download is better for me than many other sites' HD and I just re-subscribed on the strength of that. 07-08-10  01:58pm Reply To Message 5 Goldfish (0) REPLY TO #4 - messmer : Huh, too bad I didn't try the mpegs before my subscription expired. I wonder if they would look better than the wmv's on my monitor? 07-08-10  02:28pm Reply To Message 6 messmer (Disabled) REPLY TO #5 - Goldfish : I just downloaded a matching wmv file for comparison and the mpeg (mp4 H264) is definitely crisper. If you watch the video in its original window the difference seems slight but if you watch it in full screen mp4 (H264) has the advantage. BTW, I play them all in VLC. 07-08-10  02:39pm Reply To Message 7 Goldfish (0) REPLY TO #6 - messmer : Good to know for future reference. Thanks! 07-08-10  06:34pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.