| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Adult Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
John7777's Review
Nice breakdown of a crappy AVS that should have been buried before the "new millenium".
|
05-15-10 03:59am
|
Reply
52
|
Asia Movie Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
John7777's Review
Just out of curiousity, how big are the downloads?
|
05-15-10 03:54am
|
Reply
53
|
I Fucked Her Finally
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Great review, lots of details.
|
05-15-10 03:47am
|
Review
54
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Big catalogue of models (763 as of May 15th 2010)
+ Site navigation and design is way above average
+ Different choices of video D/L options
+ Mostly petite and small-breasted girls
+ Fast downloads, no limits on d/l
+ Pretty much define the Teen Paysite
+ See the hardcore content as a bonus (it's just a few girls anyway) |
| Cons: |
- There's still some OLD licensed material which they would get rid off
- The search function needs some tuning
- No technical detail of the videos on a models page, you get the choice of downloading the video in either 5 or 6 parts in .mpg or full video in 4 different formats. Problem is that the download links doesn't state the resolution or quality of the video, only the extension and size (and two of them is .mp4 with no distinction between them other than the size)
- Newly uploaded videos have that info, which I take as a minus
- The videographer(s) seems a bit afraid to get up close with the models
- No upgrading of older videos
- Bonus sites suck goat |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, third time member of the site and I was actually quite impressed at first.
Lots of new models and it looked promising. Had a night of downloading and came to the conclusion that it was more exciting to download than to watch.
I mean, I might be a bit cynic here, but it's the same scene over and over again. Even if it's a beauty it get boring because you know excatly how it's going to be.
With that said, Nubiles is still a good site. I downloaded some 80 GB (which of I'll probably delete half of it), but it's still worth the money.
There are some memorable girls in there. |
|
05-14-10 03:56pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
55
|
Femanic
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I'm sorry, you're right about that. I guess I was a bit hasty in my review. I redid the review and added some more details to it.
|
04-24-10 12:35pm
|
Review
56
|
Femanic
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Explicit content
+ Exclusive content
+ Piss vids are great
+ Excellent video quality (varies between 960x540 .mp4 / 720x404 .avi / 640x480 .avi - high bitrate on all files though )
+ Access to lezpoo.com
+ A couple of nice chicks like Sasha, Rhonda, Tereza (Jana Mrazkova), the rest are decent at best |
| Cons: |
- Limited contents
- Most of the vids are split into parts (especially new videos, which can be split into 12+ parts)
- Awful website design and functionality
- Not a lot of attractive girls (given the contents I guess that's understandable, but why does it have to be that way?
- Actually not as exciting as I though it would be
- Not that much pissing
- A considerable amount of puke and spitting (For me this is a con, for others it might be a pro)
- Limited downloads (may depend on your connection though) My limit was 4 simultaneous downloads |
| Bottom Line: |
I've sparsely come across clips from this site and it's sister site in the past couple of years and was quite amazed by the quality of the videos considering the niche.
Reassuringly all the videos are of great quality, though in different formats.
You can easily download the whole site in an evening and enjoy it. After that Recycle bin is knocking on your door. |
|
04-16-10 07:16pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
57
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Very good video quality overall
+ Excellent download speeds
+ Girls from east Europe/Russia
+ No pornstars
+ Some exclusive content
+ Somewhat easy navigation on the website
+ updating older videos to new standards |
| Cons: |
- The site is heavily based on Flash
- Viewing a single photo in a photoset is inpossible, you have to select which photo you want to see (out of up to 100 pics in a set) and then get another annoying flash strip with thumbnails, and as you select the pic you want to see the thumbnailstrip is covering the end of the photo.
- The solo videos, although include very beautiful girls, are slow and boring.
- Uneaven content - a lot of the girls on the site are licensed photosets from early '00.
- Ivana, Masha & and other Russian newcomers dominate the site) |
| Bottom Line: |
Youngporn.net is a completely new place nowadays. I remember some years ago, when this was something else...a dump of old scanned photos that looked like they came from a 1970's porn magazine.
Good riddance, the Russians came to fix it...or?
Well, they managed to cook up a pretty nice site, which is definitely worth a one month subscription, considering the amount of content that's inside. |
|
11-04-09 04:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I recently faced that crossroad. Trying to structure all my drives to a certain type, the 500GB dedicated for porn was'nt actually enough anymore, so instead of have "special folders" I bought a 1TB disc, problem is moving it all to that disc...takes a while...
|
11-04-09 01:51pm
|
Reply
59
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yeah, I'm still hoping to find a site that will blow my mind, but so far it looks grim...
|
06-18-09 04:23pm
|
Review
60
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ No guys
+ Beautiful girls
+ Good video options, you're not forced to download HD (1280 x 720) there's always an option for 640 x 480 in Great Quality (which I and my harddrive prefer)
+ logical navigation
+ Finally a good website, it remembers where you left off on the model index, and pick you up where you finished last night (cookies, I know, in this case it's good cookies!) |
| Cons: |
- some sets are to generic, no sense of lust, although some sets has it
- blondes on blondes & brunettes on brunettes, please seperate
- some of the models look the same, it's hard to get a feel of their personality
- a fair deal of "licensed" material from the 90's
- picture sets only from most of the licensed old sets (more of a novelty value) |
| Bottom Line: |
I scoured PU & TBP for a site I havn't joined before and that has received a rating over 80%, but to my dismay I winded up with, Sapphic Erotica, a site I were a member of back in 2004, and had some mixed emotions about. So what had happened in those years of abscence?
Well, quite a lot, actually. The website is amongst the better porn sites out there, and a big improvement since last time.
The site is structured down to your basic 'search my model name' or by 'model type', be it shaved, hairy, small or big boobs, they're all there.
Unfortunately the search engine don't give the results you want, so it's better to go with the 'model by name' method, which is where you find the strenght and weakness' of this site.
Theres' an abundance of beautiful girs on this site, so it's wellworth joining, problem is most of them look the same, and the ones who don't are just some washover photos from the 90's, some of them incredible hot though, but still...
It is still a great website, and the content overall maintains a high level, although a bit generic, but all the same recommendable. |
|
06-03-09 09:13pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
61
|
Pee Pee Babes
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Great video options; either scene by scene download or full video download.
- Videos are available in HD (.wmv - 3122/kbs / 1280x720) and in slightly lower quality .mp4's
- Decent mix of well-known EU actresses & up-rising starlets and some no-names
- Access to a 30+ sites from the same network
- Good value for your money ($29.95) |
| Cons: |
- Unfortunately, there's not a lot of pee on this site. It's the usual solo/lesbian masturbating and dildoing and right at the end of the video one of the girl pee. It's not exciting, it's just predictable and boring.
- Would be nice to have a main site for the network, where you could browse through all featured models and their respective scenes instead of jumping through 30 different sites
- Too much focus on those "soon out of commission" Hungarian babes; Eva Angel, Sandra Shine, Sophie Moone, (the old ALS scratch off) and what have you.
- Slow download speed.
- Large file sizes. Well that's not that surprising considering the video options. The HD videos are ca 400-500 MB and mp4 files ca 120-300 MB. So you'll need a big HD if you join this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Peepeebabes.com is somewhat of an anticlimax. The "peepee" in "babes" is more or less 5/95%.
So if you're looking for your favourite eastern European porn star to pee for you (like I admittedly did when I joined this site) you won't be overwhelmed, on contrary you'll probably be disappointed.
However, the network of sites around it has a couple of good videos too. There's also consistency, most of the models are featured on most of the (more popular) sites.
I've been through a couple of network sites before, and though this is not one pof the best it's worth taking a dive into if you have some spare money and some spare HD space. |
|
12-23-08 02:30pm
Replies (1)
|
Rating
62
|
Real Squirt
(0)
72.0
|
No Review.
|
05-26-08 06:32pm
|
Rating
63
|
We Live Together
(0)
65.0
|
No Review.
|
04-09-08 06:21pm
|
Rating
64
|
FTV Girls
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-09-08 08:50pm
|
Rating
65
|
Matt's Models
(0)
62.0
|
No Review.
|
02-09-08 08:22pm
|
Comment
66
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
02-09-08 08:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
67
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of models
- Good mix of models
- A lot of pretty girls
- Nice site design and navigation
- Offers different video download options
- Offers zipped phosets
- Good video quality of newer models |
| Cons: |
- Video quality on average is just ok
- Video quality on older videos are very bad
- Most models only strip
- The contents are too soft
- It would be nice to see some toy action |
| Bottom Line: |
A very good site indeed, which offers very beautiful girls but which will leave you with a sense of unacomplishment. |
|
02-09-08 05:39pm
Replies (1)
|
Rating
68
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
76.0
|
No Review.
|
02-07-08 07:21pm
|
Rating
69
|
Deluxe Pass
(0)
87.0
|
No Review.
|
02-07-08 07:15pm
|
Review
70
|
Little Trouble Maker
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Sarah Blake
- Lots of photosets
- Amateur stuff by a famous porn star
- Access to Lightspeed Network |
| Cons: |
- Low quality videos
- Low quality photos
- Out of date design, looks and navigation
- No recent uploads |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're a fan of Sarah Blake, you might consider joining Lightspeed Network and add this site as an option. You'll get some nice pics, but as a stand a lone site, it has nothing to offer. |
|
02-07-08 06:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
71
|
Jordan Capri
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- One of the most beautiful girls I've seen
- Large selection of pictures and movies
- Great membership options (The Lightspeed Network) |
| Cons: |
- The photos are too small
- Sets are to similar
- Low quality videos
- Navigation feels old and outdated, as well as site design in genreal
- Over-priced |
| Bottom Line: |
As with all Lightpeed sites, it fails. Technically speaking; the pictures are too small, and the videos are badly encoded, although the later videos are better, but far from good even (give up the .wmv!)
Despite of the technical shortcomings I love this site, or more precisely I love Jordan Capri. And if you too do, it's worth it! |
|
02-07-08 05:36pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
72
|
Explicite Art
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Exclusive content
- Access to John B Root films
- Full movies
- Some beautiful girls
- Some moviesets are available as photosets
- Fast server |
| Cons: |
- Low quality videos
- No video options
- Just a handfull of the models are worth the price
- Most photosets are not available as videos
- Navigation is somewhat akward |
| Bottom Line: |
Good exclusive contents, but poor video quality. |
|
02-07-08 04:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
73
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
02-02-08 04:07pm
Replies (3)
|
Rating
74
|
MetArt
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-02-08 03:48pm
|
Review
75
|
Glamour Flower
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The site has a couple of beautiful models
- Exclusive content
- Videos of some "hard to find" models
- Access to a forum where you can talk to the models and other members of the site
- Resolution choices vary from 640x480 to 3888x2592 |
| Cons: |
- Navigation is a bit akward
- No Zip-sets of the galleries (which can be over 300 pics/set)
- Otherwise a pretty good photoset viewer
- Poor quality on some videos
- only 42 models to date
- Overpriced based on contents ($39.99/1 month) |
| Bottom Line: |
As most of these new sites that offers "nude art" it's obvious that it's a rip off of good ol' Met art. But this site features new models and is in my mind worth a try. Of course it's a bit on the pricy side, but be sure to check out the preview before you decide - http://www.glamourflower.com/models.php |
|
02-02-08 03:26pm
Replies (0)
|
