All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
POV XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
I've never joined, but I've had this on my list of "possible join" sites for about 2 years now (being a Sarah Blake, as well as POV, fan).
One cautionary note, and I just checked in again, is that every time I've checked the site, they have exactly the same preview content (believe me, I remember that Sarah Blake preview!)
So while the site might be updating, the preview content certainly has not, which I consider a warning sign, the site may be just a collection of videos without any support staff or updates. And the price tag is a little high (IMHO) to take a chance on it.
|
11-17-08 08:37pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Ditto to Drooler's reply, I hate IM's and refuse to use them. They are way too invasive. If someone needs to get a hold of me that badly, they have my phone number and can call me. And if I don't want to answer, that's what answering machines are for. Cell phones and IM suck.
|
11-14-08 10:23pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I pretty much agree with everyone else's comments here, but my 2 "most annoying" scenes are:
1) Guy grabs the girls head from behind and forces her down on his dick, grabs her hair in his fist and keeps her down. This has got to be one of the most humiliating things, plus a massive turn off for me. If the girl doesn't want to do it, what's the point? It's almost like rape, pretty sick actually.
2) Guys that fuck like they're a freight train moving 100 MPH, super hard fast fucking. Come on, do people really do this in real life? I suppose some people like "hard sex" but these kind of scenes make it look more like running a marathon than fucking. Is that really pleasurable? Major turn off for me.
|
11-06-08 10:36pm
|
Reply
29
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Reply
Hi Jeffrey,
I was a member of this site a couple of years ago - and totally agree with your comments. I don't understand why TBP gives this site an 87.1.
The models are HOT, but like you said, HE WON'T STOP TALKING! Plus the camera is constantly jiggling around everywhere, very unprofessional.
I remember being so disappointed with this site. I remember watching "20 minute workout" back in the 1980's (Ron Harris production) and thinking how extremely hot the models were working out and how excellent the photography was. Ron got famous from this as well as his Aerobicize videos.
But with his website, the videos are very amateurish. If he would just buy a tripod, and close his mouth, and zoom out just a little further (so you can see more than the upper left corner of her mouth and the lower right corner of her pussy) it would be awesome.
The photo quality however is top notch, he really is a gifted photographer. Perhaps if he hired someone else to do the videos?
It's so hard to find really good solo content these days, one thing or another always seems to spoil it. Usually it's over-production or too much makeup. In this case, it's the guy holding the camera.
|
11-06-08 10:18pm
|
Comment
30
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
11-01-08 11:50am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
31
|
Chasin Girls
(0)
|
|
10-27-08 09:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
32
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
majormikes's Reply
Hi majormikes,
If you read my comment closely, the discount was offered directly by Digital Desire until October 1. Now that it's Oct 17, well....
Fear not, all is not lost. If you go to http://www.paysitediscounts.com/, they have links to many websites, including this one. If you go through here, then to Digital Desire, you can still get the $18/mo price. Can't beat that. You'll probably find other ones here you like as well.
Good luck!
|
10-17-08 11:32pm
|
Comment
33
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
09-26-08 04:02pm
Replies (8)
|
Reply
34
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks, PinkPanther, you were right. I have a list of "experimental" sites to check out, this was at the top of it, just to see. The photo sets, as few as the good ones are, are pretty hot. Really odd though that their base price would be so high with so little content. They're not even in the same league with many bigger sites (like 1byday) that give you so much more for your money.
Funny thing, after submitting this review, my download speeds have gone down the toilet. Maybe the webmaster read my review??? LOL
|
07-07-08 10:21pm
|
Reply
35
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Matt Frackas's Reply
Hey Matt! The man himself! Thanks for the comments and compliments, that means alot from someone in the business.
Thanks as well for the invitation to discuss fun topics, especially beer! If you aren't already stocked for the holiday, I'd recommend an Arrogant Bastard Ale (or 2 or 3) from Stone Brewing Company, one of my personal favs.
I'm actually going out to the valley today, I wonder if I'll be driving by your house?
I look forward to more exchanges, I may contact you through your website.
Have a good one.
|
07-04-08 11:44am
|
Reply
36
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
pornmaster's Reply
Hey pornmaster, thanks for the comments. Wow, having to turn down girls that want to be photographed naked, what a cool problem to have! Sounds like Matt has quite the fantasy life.
So you're the site manager? Wow, another cool job.
I don't know if it's possible, but one thing I would recommend to improve the site would be to remaster the old content. I was impressed to see so many models in their "just starting out" phase, and not that I was expecting alot, but was disappointed to see the small images and videos. Of course, 3 or 4 years ago, it would have been awesome, but after being spoiled by so many high end sites and HD quality, the old stuff has a hard time competing.
On the technical side, the site is well organized performs well, nice job!
Have a nice holiday!
|
07-04-08 11:38am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Taylor Rain comes to mind, very surprised she's not in the list.
|
07-03-08 11:08pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Many years ago, I was very into the girl-girl thing, although more recently not so much so. However a genuine, passionate kissing sequence can still get me going. VivThomas.com has some excellent content in this arena, although I've never joined them directly - you can get some, lower quality access to the content from TeenDreams.com - but I'd recommend any lover of girls kissing to check VivThomas.com out.
|
07-03-08 11:03pm
|
Reply
39
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Hi, TheRizzo. If you're a Twistys fan I strongly recommend it, especially for $18, as it sounds like you haven't joined before. While personally I think Twistys is a better site (more fun oriented and doesn't take itself too seriously) Digital Desire does have some truly excellent glamour content.
Just stick to the model index and go through alphabetically. Each model has all of her content, with links to her sets in each of the crazy categories. From there, you can piece together the photo layouts with a little work. I also forgot to mention that they have a pretty good video preview capability, where you can stream a video low quality to check it out before deciding if you want to download the high quality version.
Another thing other reviewers have discussed is the download speeds. I did find it a little slow, however I use DownThemAll with Firefox, and set the maximum files to download simultaneously to 1, and set max chunks to 2. This seemed to help the download performance.
Good luck, let me know if you join and what you think. I hope you find this info useful.
|
07-03-08 09:50pm
|
Reply
40
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Hi PinkPanther, thanks for the comments/clarification. I actually got a deal to join for $18 that was good til the 30th of the month, and I joined on the 29th, so I got it just in time.
One thing I forgot to mention in my review, is that $29.95 is not worth it, unless you've never joined ddgirls before, or haven't for a long time. However the discount of $22.90 would be worth it, as odd as that price is.
I was able to harvest the site in a month, although I'm still unpacking and checking out the goodies.
I'm not sure if they'll clean up the categories, it would be alot of work, and would remove one of their signature trademarks. Seems like some of the artsy-fartsy nature of the videos is reflected in their overly-creative category names. Is this a porn site or an art school?
|
07-03-08 09:40pm
|
Reply
41
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks, this is good info. I'll probably move this near the bottom of my list of "sites of interest".
|
11-25-07 11:15am
|
Reply
42
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Hey JD - thanks for the comment, that's disappointing. I've had my eye on this one for a while, never joined, there seem to be some really hot Thai girls though. So the video samples on the site are the same quality as the actual videos? What about the bonus network sites (Hennessie, Asian Suck Dolls, others), do those make the price more worth it ?
|
11-25-07 12:07am
|
Reply
43
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Great idea...but I see now they have 2 "October" update pages (probably just a typo) although when I looked at it yesterday there was only one "October" update page that stopped with Aneta Keys on October 16...perhaps someone is watching these posts ?!?!?
Now at least they look up to date, BUT there is still something wrong - according to the update pages, no videos since October 22!! What's up with that? I thought they released 3 videos each week?
|
11-13-07 07:36pm
|
Comment
44
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
|
11-12-07 09:03pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I only join one site every 3 to 6 months, but when I do I download what I like in that one month, so on average I'm definitely in the under 1 GB per month range. I don't know where the other users here get their time (and money) to join so many sites per month and download so much! I find that I spend most of my "porn time" checking out, sorting, and sifting what I've already downloaded. My "main collection" is only about 70 GB, but in my opinion it's the "best of the best" that I've been collecting for about 10 years.
|
11-08-07 08:34pm
|
Reply
46
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Thanks for the comment. Yes you are right - this site is very original and appeals to a variety of tastes.
Trouble is, the site becomes extremely repetitive. As kinky and outrageous as it gets, it does the same things over and over again: interview, makeup, go shopping, panty stuffing, masturbation, maybe some weird object insertions, then go on to the next model and find the same thing again. Even in the same actual locations! Resorts in Arizona, or that living room with the bar and the chair, or that shower. How many models have been in the exact same surroundings?
I don't mean to sound negative, but this is the first site I've joined like this that I actually got bored with about half way through the site. Usually I go through an entire site in a month, downloading what I like and saving it for later. This time however, I went through 2 of the 4 alphabetical model indexes, and I'm done. I'm going to cancel.
Maybe I'll join again one day, I guess it's just not my thing.
Which is sad, the site is very professional and well done, but between the kink and the repetition of the same kink with almost every model, I'm done.
|
09-11-07 10:34pm
|
Reply
47
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Hey Pink Panther!
Cool handle! I appreciate the response. Definitely moves "Digital Desire" up several notches on my list of "rejoin" sites. Please keep adding comments as you explore the non-DRM experience! This will definitely draw attention to this site...hey, maybe J. Stephen Hicks should pay us royalties?? LOL
|
08-18-07 12:51am
|
Comment
48
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
08-16-07 01:22pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
How about "ALL OF THE ABOVE" !!
|
02-13-07 09:05pm
|
Reply
50
|
Girls And Fingers
(0)
|
Reply of
YanksTodd's Reply
Hello, YanksTodd. Thank you for your thoughtful message and for addressing all of my concerns. I would very much like to take you up for your offer of a "Free Week" - I'm just not quite sure how to directly email you. Please let me know the procedure.
It really sounds like most issues I ran into were due to the site changing ownership. But I did make one error - the video quality is very good, I went back and double checked the videos I downloaded (640x480) and I apologize for this error. I will correct this fact in my review as soon as I finish this reply.
On the price, with your discount of $10 for TBP members, that is an outstanding price. I just felt that $30 was too much compared to other $30 sites I've joined (I'd be happy to provide a list if you're interested). Thank you for offering this discount to everyone, that is extremely generous and more than fair.
Lastly, on the cancellation issue, I certainly don't want to argue with you. While I did not keep detailed records, I verified that I signed up on 11/21/06 (according to my bank statement). To the best of my knowledge, I cancelled around 12/14, and could no longer access the site after about 12/16. I believe these dates to be accurate because I joined another site right after yours (after access was denied) and that site join was on 12/18.
I certainly am not implying there was anything "vindictive" about cancelling, likely it was an error (perhaps due to the new site getting revved up?).
Anyway, I am interested in moving forward and checking out the new site. Please send me details on how I can directly email you.
Thanks again for your thoughtful, detailed reply!
|
01-19-07 06:59pm
|
|