I like a little slap on the ass every once in a while, but most studios and sites seem to do either what PinkPanther mentioned -- the genitals-only contact -- or treat the sex as a full contact sport, where no part of the body is left untouched by a fist or some spit.
I am always amused by the way many guys start either very reluctantly or very aggressively. If there is any plot, it seems like it is either "Hey, what are getting naked for?" or "I'm going to punish you: now let me see that pussy!" Granted if I was on camera my voice would be cracking and I would be blushing heavily, but the fact that there doesn't seem to be a lot of middle ground is pretty funny to me.
They are pretty annoying, especially considering that the newest videos max out at 1280 x 720, and the watermarks are not the smallest around. Older ones have that annoying crown logo, but newer ones have "DDFProd.com" in the lower right hand corner, with a small crown on it.
I don't like taking pills, not even aspirin, so I have to say I never have, and (hopefully) never will!
It's just the newest product to pray on the age old male insecurity; promise, or just hint at enhancing the penis and men fork over the cash before you can even say Pfizer. It's sort of like how plastic surgeons pray on women, except that method actually works (sort of) as long as you're willing to go under the scalpel.
"Any, as long as she's pretty" -- and I mean it! I say I prefer red heads and brunettes with breasts on the small side, but my preferences go right out the door every time I start a new membership or simply meet a new girl. I think the demands of evolution keep me from being to picky. :)
I would also add 'as long as it looks reasonably natural' considering how I dislike the look of heavy makeup, hair dyes, and implants. I am like messmer in that I generally want them to look like real life women, and I find the goddess-like beauty of some models intimidating.
It looks pretty much as fake as the other sites but with a more serious tone, possibly so as to de-emphasize the prop cock (not to mention the pint size confectioner's glaze 'cumshots').
The darker theme of this site is pretty obvious with the red and black color scheme and the quasi-S/M tour videos, but somehow it's a little easier to swallow (uh, poor word choice) with the laughably fake facial prop. I think if I were to dive into this type of porn (the over-the-top special effect cocks and cumshots) I would go for one of their other sites where the silliness of it all is acknowledged and more or less embraced as good humored sleaze.
Yes, that's a good review. All the technical aspects organized and in easy to read formats really helps. I am afraid he's right about video quality and navigation too. :(
This sucks! ISPs can really ruin one's experience with a site, especially if far faster speeds are possible.
I also joined under the August 10th Anniversary deal but only for one month (I guess I have some sympathy for my hard drives), and my download speeds have been very decent, but I'm in the U.S., not Europe (which definitely beats Iraq in Internet access!). I have been get some pretty slow page loads, but that was expected with the warnings other members had given in last month's comments.
I am not sure if the "bonus" sites are completely non-exclusive. House of Taboo is definitely separate from 1BD, but aim of its content sort of demands that. Other sites it is hard to tell what is what, though the badandy-amount of content on 1BD can make it pretty difficult to tell, not to mention that models work across many of the sites doing similar acts. For example, the sizzling Zuzana Z. does fisting on three or four of the sites, but I haven't found all of it on 1BD.
They can look cute, but as long as it is not taken too far with schoolgirl outfits, 'acting' like a child, and playing with the pigtails, then I am okay.
I am sorry, but on MILFs it just doesn't work, unless they are young mothers, but that's a different poll.
I just joined a few days ago and am having quite a bit of fun exploring the various sites -- a lot of content for one price!
I have seen the pages loading somewhat slowly as mentioned in another comment, but the downloads have all been speedy for me, at least 1.2 Mb to 1.5 Mb/s. I have only been using the recommended Firefox download manager DownloadThemAll!, so maybe it's a software problem for you.
Yes, it seems the majority of my time is spent downloading, not enjoying, the many delights of the wonderful world of porn. This may really be a case of the chase being better than the catch.
I'm a collector so there are two things that keep me downloading instead of watching:
First, when I a member of a site I want to get the most out of that membership. Sure, I can watch whenever I want to, but I can only download when I am a member and so I feel the clock ticking away whenever I spend too much time looking at videos or photos and I still have a membership to use.
Second, I always have the nagging fear of an impending "Road Warrior"-style apocalypse in the not too distant future, though in my case I will be fighting over computer and generator parts, not fuel (beyond what I need to keep the generators running in order to power my end-of-days computer setup, of course). If this is the case, I need to stock up on as much material as possible now, because when it happens all the armed fringe groups will probably wipe out all the unarmed fringe groups (like pornographers and their open-minded models) and we'll be fresh out of updates for a few years at least.
I have lost count of the number of times I have read that "she's a party girl!" and "this model is crazy!" Then there is the all time classic: "this girl loves sex!" Really? My view of girls who pose nude and masturbate on camera is that they are all total prudes... Admittedly some performers look like they are having more fun than others, but really no model has to love anything in porn; she just has to give consent.
More importantly, I don't give a shit about what they really love, hate, eat, etc. since porn is pretty much total fantasy. If the bios/profiles were all accurate, I suspect I would have been too depressed after reading a few and given up porn a long time ago.
I found that 10th Anniversary deal and I am thinking of joining the herd and signing up. I have yet to be a member of any DDF site yet, so it sounds like my hard drives may have some serious spinning to do...
(I wonder if you guys will be pissed at me if I join and add to the slowness, or for not having ever been a member, or maybe even both! :) )
This is a hell of deal -- I'm itching to take the plunge before the end of the month -- but I think it's actually nine-for-one. They may have material spread throughout the five sites you already listed, but I believe this deal also includes:
As people say, the thing about first impressions is you only get to make one. If you start in the forum and the first post is something like "Check out _____! Free ___ and ___!!" well...I get suspicious to say the least, but usually angry, and I don't even run the site!
I wish new users would take a few minutes to look around to see how the site is set up; no ads, pop-ups, or any other bullshit to think this is the place to unload some digitized death threat or spam sandwich. I love how I can come back here day after day and see a level of civility and tolerance not even found in American government.
I really get more suspicious of new users who join just to post short, super high scoring reviews for obscure sites, but maybe that's a different poll.
I seriously doubt anyone would likely ever tire of shooting her! ;) And it's nice to see a brunette in the top 10 -- are there any redheads there too?
It sucks that her earlier hardcore was the result of pressure, as this is the cause of much irritation for fans when they see models do shit that they feel is just trendy or dumb (implants, tattoos, etc.). Well, whatever you do, keep bringing her, and other top models, back for more!
This site is a marriage made in heaven, a perfect match of technology and perversion, and its for a good purpose. These are hot and happy models, the smiles seem genuine, and scenes come about only as a result of a girl's willingness and comfort level with the possible task at, or sometimes even in, hand. This means that some girls only really like to show off their smile and might wink at you, while others will show virtually everything and then some, and only wink at you using their asshole. Let me at least say that I know my smile is genuine.
Models are fit and thin, many with fully shaven pussies, few tattoos, and I have yet to find any breast implants (I still have a hard time believing this myself, so if I am wrong please say so). The first two dozen or so are Canadian girls (who I have yet to see anywhere else, but I like them), and the rest are a mix of amateur and somewhat well known Americans, eastern Europeans, and a few more Canadians. This really is not the place for the well-worn veteran, or high figure star, but most know how to show off the goods. The vast majority are white, which didn't really bother me, but I have to mention it, as I know there are prospective members out there looking for some diversity, and this site may not have what they are seeking. Still, much of the content may have you focused less on the outside than on the inside, in which case every model is pretty much the same color.
Nobody's perfect, and this site comes at a high price: $35 per month, with no rebilling or multi-month discounts. I will say you get what you pay for as there is much to enjoy and download here, but it is still a somewhat high price, though it has never risen in all the years I have been a member. Navigation is easy as the site is cleanly laid out, but the search engine is a little too simple. It only searches videos using whatever term or keywords you choose and/or a category out of a list of twenty-nine categories, with categories as diverse as “Beautiful Bums” or “Cervix Views” or “Treadmill”.
If you like your girls to have fun by themselves and view the fun at few inches distance or less, this may be Crack that's worth an addiction. There are no guys taking up the frame, and virtually little input from the crew – hallelujah! I mean little to no talking, no interviews, no heavy panting by the cameramen, and very little behind the scenes fantasy crushers. When anything even close to this happens in a video, the descriptions give ample warning – “male hands involved” or “you do heard the crew talk in this one” – and these are minor infractions compared to many of the other sites' self-centered douche bags as they guffaw and add commentary through countless photo and video shoots. Hey, that's our job!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ A near literal translation of its name; this site can define the closeup genre.
+ Nearly 300 naturally beautiful models in 325 shoots.
+ Excellent use of technology; newer videos (shoot #114 and above) are offered in 1920x1080 @ 9MB/s .wmv.
+ Great photography up to 2400x1900; near perfectly lit, lots of wide angle closeups, great colors and details.
+ Model action is pretty diverse and interesting; girl-girl, toys, weird insertions, anal, peeing.
+ Fully archived content all the way to the very beginning in 2001.
+ Downloads are as fast as they are big: I have gotten speeds of up to 1.5 MB/s!
+ Little behind the scenes content, almost no off camera talking or interference.
+ Billing through CCBill.
Cons:
- $35/month is high, and there are no recurring or multi-month discounts available.
- Graphic, screen-filling closeups and certain content (queefing, douching, pissing, etc.) may not be every member's favored approach to porn.
- First eight shoots are video only.
- Earlier photography is smaller, around 1024x800.
- Lots of wide angle lens used, and unconventional photo cropping done; for example, some photos are 1800x1800.
- Though navigation is simple and clean, the search engine may be too weak for some, and it only applies to videos.
- Ethnically homogeneous; few really 'exotic' models, vast majority are white north Americans and eastern Europeans.
- I still wish there was a little more girl-girl content.
Bottom Line:
I have been a member of the 'Crack on four separate occasions over the last few years, and every time I am more than happy to fork over the money and fill up my hard drives some more -- they keep adding models but never stray too far from the close-is-not-close-enough approach.
Yes, this site is deep within the glorious chasm of the female nether regions, and it is more than happy to bring you along! I love a good girl models-only site, but they take things to a unique macroscopic level of enjoyment and seem to revel in it the whole time. There are more than a few times when video camera lens are fogged up or hit by flying body fluids...and if you have to think about this and still ask, then this site may not be for you. In a more technical way of putting it, lots of wide angle lens are used, and though you see plenty of models stripping and posing, the emphasis is below the belt at distances best measured in fractions of an inch.
That having been said, I love the presentation of their perverted arts. For the last four years they have offered videos in beautiful 1920 x 1080 .wmvs at very high bit rates. They are big files, but the payoff is eye candy that only a handful of current sites can reasonably rival. As I stated above, lighting is excellent, never harsh, and only occasionally do they use an obvious additional light source, like a small pen light when, say, a model is rocking a speculum (again, not everyone's type of porn).
They do not slouch on photography either. These are great photos with bright colors, the same professional lighting and care in details, which are pretty important in this closeup work. They don't really use conventional sizes in photos; there are numerous square butthole shots (the literal “Crack” of their title), and quite a few panoramic shots of models relaxing on a couch or bed. But photos are still big and never so Photoshopped to make models' corresponding videos have glaring differences.
I find it easy and fast to get to the content, as download speeds feel turbocharged. I regularly get 1.5MB/s, so even the biggest videos – say a 30 minute video at nearly 2GB in size – came in between five and seven minutes, if that. Combine this with no download limit and your hard drive may start looking for a new owner. The flip side is that there is a limit of twenty connections at a time, so as to discourage members from using download managers, or at least stop people from queuing up tons of downloads (I can just hear badandy400 cursing at this one), but you still get lots of downloading down in a relatively short period of time.
I would rather them devote a separate site to a more hardcore-inclined model. If their intent is to attract customers who don't necessarily want to spend all their time looking through a macro lens then the current possibility of using Lexa makes sense, I just won't be joining.
When I filled out the poll, I had to look up her sets -- she currently has four -- as she was pretty forgettable as far as my favorite ITC models go. Yes, super hot, but content that is too boring for me to have remembered her. If they can make more money, good for them, hopefully it can contribute to the main site (as if needs any improvement! :) ).
Recently I logged on to the site and there was a poll concerning the possibility of creating a sister site of a single model, a Czech girl named Lexa (not to be confused with an earlier Canadian model named Lexy).
I am not too wild about spin-off sites, even if I love the original, as I do so strongly with InTheCrack. In this case, they are considering her because of positive member feedback and because they consider her one of their most attractive models. I have no problem with the latter; she is a raven-haired beauty with flawless skin and a body to die for (if looks could kill...). I mean really, if she alone was what decades of monitor technology come down to, then it would be a good thing.
My beef is with the former, as I don't really understand what all the feedback could be about, unless it is based solely on her looks. Again, she is gorgeous, and probably near the top of their models in that regard, but she is almost totally a softcore model. I am talking little, if any, masturbation, with some mild spreading, no toys, nothing nasty, and mostly just stripping and nude posing.
I originally joined the 'Crack for the action and the unique perspective on it, as much as for the eye candy of the models, so I am a little disappointed that they would consider a separate site for someone so unwilling to do what so many of their other models seem to have little trouble doing.
Any feedback about this from members, past and present, would be appreciated.
That sucks Jeffrey99! My thoughts are with you in the hopes that one day you will enjoy faster porn. I feel that it is part of our inalienable rights -- life, liberty, pursuit of happiness -- and we should all have it in this day and age.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
