| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Too much anal? I guess that would be like too much sugar or too much fat; everybody likes it but in excess it's not good for you.
That being said, I do think there might be too much plain Jane anal sex (if such a thing exists) instead of vaginal, but just the right amount of the other anal-related acts: the fisting, gaping, winking, and milk-shooting we've all come to expect at this point. For those more crazy ones I think it takes a dedicated and open-minded (open-assed?) performer. Not just some girl who's doing it for the money but someone who's gone through all the unsexy and unfun prep work to perform a great-but-not-gross scene and still get some self-satisfaction at the end.
Watch/experience some scenes from anal heroines like [ignore]HotKinkyJo, Roxy Raye, or Proxy Paige[/ignore] though and they'll may make you think that the rest of porn doesn't have enough anal action. ;-)
|
10-05-13 04:03pm
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
He said prolapses were exotic, though you might think some performers were trying to prove otherwise, not erotic.
However some of us do find them erotic--just don't ask us to explain why! I certainly can't explain why certain things turn me on, mixed up brain chemistry perhaps? :-0
|
10-05-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
I imagine that trying to explain phenomena like rosebuds or vacuum pumping to future generations will be something akin to trying to rationalize embarrassments from our past like patent medicines or the insane nuclear buildup during the Cold War. There were few genuinely positive things to say about them but they seemed like the right idea at the time.
|
09-29-13 10:38am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
BTW, I originally wanted to respond to your comment--"hooks his finger into her vagina and gouges, twists, pokes, digs, and scoops away like he's expecting to find gold"--with Goldfinger, but I held back...at least for a day. :-)
|
09-29-13 10:32am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
LOL!
That gives new meaning to the term "gold digger!"
Of course it may not actually be gold we're looking for, but it feels just as precious!
|
09-28-13 10:23pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I would have said "Other," but worrying what I could come up with to fill that answer I'll stick with "Even higher."
My opinion is, at least generally, that I like my porn to still have some erotic content until I stop and ask "Is this even porn?!" So for example, a Max Hardcore video includes some really rough sex and his content is ostensibly sexual but a lot of it just comes off as weird, rubbernecking content that doesn't really disgust me nor does it turn me on.
I don't enjoy it the same way I enjoy an equally, at least in stark physical terms, hardcore anal video involving, say, two girls happily fisting each others asses. Yeah, it's just as dirty/hardcore/perverted as a typical Max assault-athon but it's presented as way more consensual, so as "hard" as it is I still find it enjoyable.
Having said that...no matter how happy those two girls may be I definitely don't want to see either one of them poop afterwards--that'd be too far! :-0
|
09-28-13 10:18pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I go with Other too because of the reasons already mentioned; it depends on the model, and matching does matter. For example, bright pink can look pretty garish, but it can really pop on a girl with darker or tanned skin--a head turner with just a little fabric.
And frankly if the performer is working it and making a hot scene, well, the color of her lingerie just isn't that important anymore. And as much as I like to think "good girls always wear white panties" the kind of things they do in them in porn throws that idea out the window with a vengeance.
Of course in real life any color is the right color! If you get to see lingerie I see no reason to dislike the color--outside of "added" color, if you are so unlucky. :-0
|
09-20-13 09:58pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
LOL! Black it is then! :-)
|
09-20-13 09:50pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Once in a while, but more for genre than quality or customer service reasons. I've joined a few sites to find that only a handful of their scenes were what I was really into, the rest not so much. I guess like meeting a girl whilst she's flashing her tits during Spring Break only to find out she actually doesn't do it that much.
However, I say you really haven't paid for porn until you've regretting paying for it. Lust & learn. :-)
|
09-18-13 02:53pm
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Somewhat, but at this point I've come to terms with the fact that, surprise!, porn isn't being organized by librarians and archivists (except for badandy400)...though I have seen some librarians who I really wish were in porn!
Hell, if a site even has a search function I'm surprised, though I won't be expecting much out of it. If a scene isn't tagged or the site just doesn't organize things the way you might then you're out of luck. But when sites like InTheCrack, who have a category called "Large Pussy Lips," I can still have some hope for humanity after all. :-)
|
09-16-13 02:54pm
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
There's a vague maximum limit for me whenever I have to stop and ask myself "Is this even porn?" And this doesn't even mean something looks painful or abusive, just a simple case of what the fuck! But a lot of BDSM/Kink.com-style stuff is generally unappealing to me as well.
|
09-15-13 01:30am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I'm okay with women not getting fully nude. After all, they can always leave their socks on. ;-)
|
09-15-13 01:27am
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
MILF is a really overused and inaccurate term, but I guess it's sexier than saying "mature" or "old."
For example, [ignore]Nina Hartley[/ignore] is almost always in the MILF category at this point in her career though she has said in interviews she's never had kids. I guess the term is meant to conjure up some long lost teenage fantasy viewers had about fucking their friend's mom. No thanks, I was too busy eying the sisters who were much closer in age and experience. ;-)
|
09-13-13 06:30pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
I'd say 20s, since that's younger than me and is a pretty ambiguous decade when performers can still get away with many of the young tropes in porn--barely legal, teens, college co-eds--even if they may not match any of those labels in age or experience. Similarly some women have entered the industry at 18 as moms in real life but not MILFs in front of the camera (I guess method acting is underappreciated).
[ignore]Aurora Snow[/ignore] started at 18 and was portrayed as barely legal for the first few years, and then was told one day, at age 24, she was now a MILF. Never mind that she had never given birth to anything beyond a pretty decent porn career (okay, and some decent creampie scenes) the director that day apparently knew otherwise.
Outside of porn however, the term young, particularly "young woman," is not always one of affection but sometimes a euphemism for saying a woman is naive, inexperienced, or just plain dumb. In all honesty though I still prefer young in porn over the whole MILF genre as I find motherhood, whether real or implied, not particularly attractive or fuckable.
|
09-12-13 10:40pm
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, just not of the quantity and rainbow of colors of Suicide Girls or Burning Angel (of course those are mostly girls :-) ) and fortunately none of the Asian lettering or tribal designs either.
|
09-08-13 02:43am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Hee hee...you said "first up."
:-)
|
09-04-13 03:53am
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's one of those things that if it's not happening to me in real life I just don't care to watch it--there's just not much visual appeal in it for me because it's focused on the man and not the woman. However watching a girl get fingerbanged can be pretty entertaining!
|
09-04-13 03:51am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I store by website name, then whatever model name the site originally used. Otherwise it just gets too complicated and disorganized for me.
|
09-02-13 06:55pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My PS3, though I have yet to watch any Blu-Ray porn on it, or even that many Blu-Rays period. But it's versatile enough to where I can watch most digital porn with an external hard or flash drive. Gotta love that!
|
08-31-13 09:32am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I certainly find it much more entertaining for the money than a lot of mainstream entertainment out there, and certainly less scolding than the surplus of services out there that are so obsessed with gobbling up the dollars of "the family." (I swear the way Netflix keeps asking me to select between either the normal or "Just for Kids" versions worries me that I could have a kid somewhere in the world!)
If nothing else, at least in comparison to the other types of adult entertainment, porn probably has way fewer long term costs like STD tests and therapy sessions. :-/
|
08-29-13 08:00pm
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
"How they perform" over everything else. Granted their performance is by definition not completely genuine--otherwise they wouldn't be performing--but I think it's easier to respond to then looks. Makeup, hair, wardrobe (if any) are all tuned to crank up the hawt factor for the primates that we really are.
The Jenna Jamesons and Tera Patricks of the world don't really appeal to me as much as the more shy-but-naughty types do. The ones who make it look like they might actually be enjoying what they are doing and didn't have to visit a surgeon to do so.
Of course the other day I watched a short video and all I remember was the color of the girl's eyes (a striking blue hue) so who knows!
|
08-28-13 06:12pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Pat, it's more than just a cultural thing, it's the law, or at least how the law is most widely interpreted, as they worry that showing the genitals, or even pubic hair, is legally considered obscene. It does seem crazy in 2013 and in a modern, socially liberal country at that, but the U.S. has plenty of equally crazy morals-and-decency type laws on the books at the local and state levels that most likely wouldn't pass the smell test with the 1st Amendment if seriously challenged in court.
The odd thing is the genitals are a legal no-no but the ass apparently isn't...so there are some weird looking anal videos out there where the lady's vagina is either pixelated or covered with what look likes a giant Band-Aid (which I think is way more disturbing, but it's probably a fetish at this point) and her backdoor is uncensored in all it's glory.
|
08-23-13 03:25pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hate it, but then I don't watch much Japanese porn and when I do it's usually the uncensored stuff. Considering the Dadaist craziness they come up with to put in their porn the pixelating almost makes it worse--like they are censoring out something much more grotesque than bare genitals. And though I may just be uninformed because I don't watch enough or there is too much censorship, but the Japanese seem less, let's say "creative," with their genitals. I can't remember seeing any tattoos or piercings, especially compared to Western porn where you could probably start up a healthy scrap metal business from all the jewelry they're sporting below the belt.
On a lighter note to this topic, SomethingAwful.com has reviewed some Japanese porn movies over the year in extensive and hilarious detail (in a section called "The Horrors of Pornography"), and they describe the pixelation as making the women look like they have enormous mustaches every time they give a blowjob. :-)
|
08-23-13 03:04pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Over two--hell, almost twice that this summer--but it's a desktop and still pretty upgradable.
Thanks in part to sites like this, and knowing my own browsing and downloading history, I'll probably have to take the hard drives to my grave though, or at least to someplace like in the end of Terminator 2. :-0
|
08-17-13 01:37am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Other, or none of the above.
I don't know what "brutal" could entail as their is only so much appetite for what the Max Hardcore types out there will do for the camera (or in his case the prosecution). I think we will at least see a continuation of the HotKinkyJo and Kink.com flavors of filth be produced and paid for, but not necessarily in any more mainstream ways than they already are. Also with the pleasure police still sticking their noses into everything in the name of "the children" it's going to be hard for sites to go beyond the Internet to market and sell their product, even when demand increases.
The bigger question for the future isn't so much content but format; how exactly will porn be sold to still be profitable? I can't see long scenes or features being too popular, the same way iTunes and MP3s have sucked much of the lifeblood out of the album format in the music industry.
Either way porn isn't going anywhere. :-)
|
08-13-13 05:07pm
|
