| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It's useless content, in my opinion.
Too much (usually unhappy) information yet frequently very boring as well. So I can learn which family member/ex-boyfriend abused the performer the most while simultaneously being bored out of my skull because watching someone force a smile for the thousandth time just isn't that entertaining. Unfortunately too many webmasters have got it in their head that this is what we prefer to see.
|
08-11-13 01:45pm
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I like chocolate cake. :-)
|
08-11-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. A girl with a muscular jawline and six pack isn't attractive at all. Also, women naturally have more body fat than men (and in different areas) so when they work out/body-build to make it even less than what most men have it gets to be quite unappealing to me.
Sometimes I think guys who look at other guys(' muscles and bodies) are just being more honest than the guys who look at girls with the same build.
|
08-04-13 09:44pm
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I'll come out and admit to watching both, but with a definite preference for watersports over squirting, at least as squirting is usually depicted in porn.
Porn squirting just comes off as so overblown and forced. All the ear-splitting screams, twitching, and labored breathing is like a bad sex comedy--shitty acting so as to reward viewers with a fake result. It's entertaining, that's for sure, but I don't find it that sexy.
And if it's all faked, or the majority of it is, then you can see basically the same thing in watersports without the melodramatic foofaraw. Watersports/peeing porn should at least get some credit for honesty.
Even though squirting seems rarely genuine it's marketed as a point of pride for the girls performing it; while watersports is genuine but the women are a lot more bashful about it. In real life it seems most guys with any squirting experience (by pure luck apparently) have the same story: girlfriend/partner thought it was pee and was embarrassed as a result. You just can't win!
|
07-23-13 05:21am
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
To be fair, the poll doesn't specify sexes so you could easily interpret it any way you please. :-)
And there are probably more straight guys who would admit a preference for porn with "normal" cumshots from guys on/at girls than the squirting "cumshots" from girls (though I could be wrong).
|
07-23-13 04:53am
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Oh, I had almost forgotten about the browser history! I'm sure the NSA or the FBI or whoever has had a good laugh over it but I'm not sure a tech guy who has to meet me in person would be so kind.
I'm kinda worried what will happen when The Google finally gives up it's "Don't be evil" code of conduct and my search history goes up for grabs to the highest data-mining bidder. I don't think "It's research--nothing more!" will be much of an excuse at that point.
|
07-19-13 03:07pm
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Far more personal information (site passwords, financial info, etc.) would prevent me from taking it to a repair shop before the porn ever had me worried.
And in this day and age of Tumblr, Sasha Grey doing everything but porn, and whatever the hell goes on at Chatroulette, is some porn on a single guy's computer really that unexpected or even embarrassing anymore (minus the really extreme stuff we work extra hard to hide ;-) )? Granted it now seems you can have a lot of choice in almost any category of business to use to express your political and moral prejudices--hell, even Steve Jobs hated porn--but I doubt most tech places are that shielded from the real world.
If anybody is hesitant, think of it this way: you don't get it fixed you might not have access to any porn to get embarrassed about, at least for a little while.
|
07-18-13 05:05am
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
No.
Reminds me of what I think every time Sports Illustrated releases its annual swimsuit (non-nude) issue; What's the point?
|
07-16-13 10:59am
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Worse...it went from just solo girl and girl-girl to now also doing hardcore! ALS Scan just isn't the same anymore.
: - (
It's also now owned by a much larger, if at least still adult (Met-Art), company with other sites under its tentacles. I'm not quite sure if this makes it better or worse, but the boy-girl definitely irks me.
|
07-14-13 03:21am
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I have tried not to repeat myself in the Bottom Line as well, and then I'm also trying to sound different from previous reviewers.
|
07-10-13 08:31pm
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I can't really think of it ever being used to advertise anything except mostly fictional films and occasionally TV. Usually it seems to mean being left helplessly imprisoned or abandoned somewhere for the rest of your life rather than a quick, possibly easy, death.
TV Tropes has an interesting page on it, though it says it that it originally just meant r@pe.
|
06-06-13 02:06pm
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
When I have the time I will sit down and try to finish a book within a few days (I lose interest or the story if I don't), but for my "regular reading material" I prefer articles online.
I mean c'mon, how else can you easily go from your hometown newspaper to hardcore porn in a few seconds? ;-)
|
05-03-13 01:42am
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Reply
That's why I avoid sites like CNN.com. There seems little difference between them and some celebrity gossip site (and frequently no difference at all), plus all the annoying tricks and underhanded ways they employ to pump up their page view count. Splitting articles into multiple pages, misleading headlines, or just dumping a bunch of useless, spammy links instead of actually, you know, writing articles.
Basically whatever the hell you would call the Huffington Post. Is there a blocker for that site and anyone who takes it seriously? ;-)
|
05-01-13 11:10pm
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
HD doesn't really highlight the skin flaws anymore than SD did, especially considering how so many scenes are lit like an operating room (I guess so you can see inside the body? :-0 ).
I'm no fan of stretch marks, tan lines, skeazy tattoos, or scars...but who is? I have pretty fair skin myself, with more freckles and sunburns than I'd like to count. And I even worry I'm going to get a sunburn just from being near a fluorescent light too long, so it would be a little hypocritical of me to expect every woman to have perfect skin.
|
04-16-13 09:28pm
|
Reply
140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I've always found the Barbie look to be very flawed--I don't find general anesthesia-fueled "beauty" too appealing.
|
04-16-13 09:20pm
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Reply
Yeah, but didn't Yul Brynner & Co.--uh, I mean him and his robot force--go apeshit-haywire and start attacking people, like to the death?
|
04-08-13 11:46pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
"Other"
I mean, people already are, right? Not necessarily "many," but you know somebody's already violated an otherwise innocent machine. (I think the Japanese have pretty much developed the nightmarish technology.)
|
04-08-13 11:43pm
|
Reply
143
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
Occasionally I want to bash it with a sledgehammer...but normally I put it to sleep and turn off the monitor (annoying power light turns orange during sleep mode), which I do even when I plan not to use for just a few hours.
|
04-03-13 12:06am
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Technically my Internet connection is supposed to go to 12 Mbps download--in my apartment, faster Internet speeds are available only if you buy a cable bundle, thanks AT&T!--but realistically it's more in the 8-10 Mbps range. Not a big difference, and it works for Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, and other sites that benefit from a healthy connection.
Still, it's peanuts to what I've read about the recent beta testing of Google's insane 1 gigabit per second download ISP service Google Fiber (which I guess will complicate things if Google ever decides to make breakfast cereals).
That's like driving a Smart car with a tiny engine and no trunk and then being given a Rolls Royce with a V12 and massive amounts of luxury, and only for a slightly higher price. Right now such bullet train Internet speeds aren't really practical for anything but it sounds like a good development for the future of online entertainment (and the possible death of cable TV?).
|
03-28-13 08:03am
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
"Other," because I don't think firearm pictures make women sexy, but I can't limit myself just to "girly girls" either. And aren't all women kinda girly anyway, on account of having a vagina?
More generally I don't understand the whole sexy-girl-with-____ kind of photos. Some beautiful girl in a bikini--hint: porn will show even more than a bikini!--is already beautiful, I don't really care to look at anything else. Seriously, how does an expensive car, motorcycle, energy drink (no, seriously), gun, whatever, become better simply by association because the company hired a hot girl to pose with it? And frankly, knowing my priorities, I would take the girl over whatever machine she is straddling/promoting.
Reminds me of the shop scene in Loaded Weapon 1, where Emilio Estevez is looking at a centerfold of a gigantic sniper rifle.
|
03-25-13 10:41am
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
LOL, vampire porn probably requires women to pose with different types of weapons.
|
03-25-13 10:20am
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like girls in their 20s, though preferably not in college.
|
03-12-13 09:54pm
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
LOL I guess people's opinions of tan lines could change dramatically as they age, thus we need to keep asking every year. :-)
|
02-27-13 08:53pm
|
Reply
149
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
tangub, here's the orginal poll Khan mentioned, if you're interested: replies_view.html?id=68950
|
02-27-13 07:00pm
|
Reply
150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
They've always looked kinda rednecky to me, but I generally don't care about them.
|
02-27-13 06:59pm
|
