Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : turboshaft (0)  

Feedback:   All (676)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (13)  |   Replies (652)

Other:   Replies Received (235)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 151-175 of 678 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
151
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

"Second the WTF is Roku"

Me too. I almost thought it was a board game or puzzle of some sort, neither of which I can use to stream porn.


02-19-13  07:22pm

Reply
152
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

That's an interesting link but I'm not totally sure about what it claims: "If properly conditioned, the PCs enable you to stop ejaculation while continuing to enjoy sex." Okay, no, you don't ejaculate, but you do orgasm? That's one of those things that might freak me out a little, like if I'm feeling something and I've always expected an accompanying action along with it. Seriously, wouldn't most guys think there might be something wrong?

And I would think in terms of your partner(s) there would be an expectation of multiple ejaculations when you say multiple orgasms, not having a less-than-hair trigger. Women love it (unless they really didn't want to have sex) when a guy can do either, but I'm not sure if they're totally concerned that you're having multiple orgasms before you finally take your shot, so to speak. Maybe it's just me, but having sex, even if it eventually only results in just 1 orgasm + 1 ejaculation, still feels pretty damn good.


02-16-13  09:25pm

Reply
153
N/A Reply of marcdc1's Reply

"Ah that explains the demise of black berry! No cum timing app! Lol. Brilliant analysis Drooler."

That and those damn keypads are a lot harder to clean--I mean, that's at least what I've heard.


02-16-13  09:12pm

Reply
154
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not to get all Bill Clinton on the question, but it depends on how you define "surf," since, yes, I've looked at porn on other people's computers, but not alone. I've done it usually in the whole share-the-wealth approach I think more people should take to porn (show someone a site or picture), instead of just hoarding like some paranoid doomsday survivalist.

In fact I've frequently looked at something or watched a video and thought, Hey, more people should see this (and occasionally thought, Wow, that mindfuck of erotica shouldn't be shared with anyone!).


02-12-13  11:06am

Reply
155
N/A Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

I sure hope it's not! Sometimes I just prefer my stimulants in double doses.

02-12-13  10:58am

Reply
156
N/A Reply of bibo's Poll

Really depends on how you define "fetish," because if it's playing dress up and testing one's knot tying skills, then I have no interest. And the thing is I have subscribed to more general porn sites that also touch, literally and figuratively, on the things that might be called a fetish.

Then again, take a site like Kink.com and I find all the exhibitionism, water dunking, and rope play an absolutely boring turn off. I do like their rough anal, girl/girl, and fisting content, but plenty of other sites wouldn't even bother to label those things fetish anymore. Hell, a girl with a bush is practically considered a fetish model, but her ability to fist isn't? Who would would have seen that coming 20 years ago?


01-26-13  08:45pm

Reply
157
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Lol If I was at a seafood restaurant that's probably what I'd order.

And I have about as much interest in feet as I do in seafood, by the way. Two tastes that I have yet the slightest understanding of why people prefer them.


01-26-13  08:35pm

Reply
158
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Watching and buying porn are two very different things to me.

What gets me in the mood to watch? Waking up is more than enough for me--and what a way to start the day! :-)

As far as buying, I admit I'm a frugal person so it depends on whether I'm even in the mood to spend any money, much less give up some of my personal info to some website I might never have used before.


01-23-13  02:03am

Reply
159
N/A Reply of messmer's Reply

Sorry, but pretty much everything I've seen would not rationally be classified as striptease. Hence, why I'm not a very good judge and start yelling at the screen "Take that stupid shirt off already!" before I'm about ready to shoot the TV Elvis-style.

01-16-13  06:30pm

Reply
160
N/A Reply of messmer's Reply

Well, in my opinion, if an actress leaves something on for more than say 60 seconds it's too long. :-)

01-16-13  05:58pm

Reply
161
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

To be honest, with the Internet connections I've had over the years, combined with a practice of avoiding slower sites, I can't say that I've actually avoided a download because it was too big.

Of course I have reviewed files later and realized I have a 1 GB (or larger) video that I only really like half of and can't easily keep the parts I like. I guess I'm stuck between preferring whole videos and skipping through all the useless striptease and uninformative/creepy interview BS.


01-15-13  11:14pm

Reply
162
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't have cable, but I do have an LCD TV with a PS3 and a Netflix instant watch subscription (where they have a ton of older TV shows, though most are of no interest to me). Does any of what I watch on there count?

But I know next to nothing about any of the latest TV shows or series and I probably couldn't care any less if I ever did. :-)


12-28-12  09:04am

Reply
163
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Well, obviously not at the table during Christmas dinner, but about the same otherwise.

On a side note, I generally don't like holiday-themed porn. Maybe it's something about not wanting to associate Santa hats and tree decorating with threesomes and crazy cumshots, or I just don't get turned on by Christmas.


12-20-12  03:59pm

Reply
164
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Review

Great review, exotics4me!

What I've seen of this site, and Kink.com's network in general, is that it can either be a bold, new awakening for some or a bold, scary turnoff for others. Enemas, fisting, and gaping all sounds fine to me (at least the way EB handles it) but I know others who would unplug their router and run for the hills. ("I love porn, but what the fuck is this?!")

At least you don't seem too turned off, though I'm kind of neutral on what I've seen of their enema stuff. After anal fisting, even double anal fisting!, an enema almost seems quaint by comparison. And seeing the anal fisting makes me feel like a virgin compared to what the girls get into here. Like shooting some hoops with some friends and then watching a professional game on TV, realizing you're not even close. :-)

Just out of curiosity, since they seem to emphasize video, what do you think of the Q&A/interviews at the end (occasionally at the beginning) of their videos?


12-11-12  10:43pm

Reply
165
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I actually tried to smoke but it didn't stick--no cravings, stress, anything else that genuine smokers claim makes them continue to light up. That and I just didn't get anything out of it--almost every other "vice" I can think of has had some sort of effect on me physiologically or psychologically.

I have a pretty sensitive nose though and cigarettes can be one of the stinkier habits (of course so can something as "healthy" as eating seafood, which I also can't stand...), plus I'm a cheap bastard!


12-11-12  10:30pm

Reply
166
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I'd love to direct, even if there was little-to-no pay.

But put myself in the scene? Hmm...though it would feel a little weird when I paid the girl afterwards (as opposed to before, like when you're on a date ;-) ).


11-27-12  06:59pm

Reply
167
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Boring!

Another one of those things I'd rather experience in person than watch in a video. Though to be fair this is true of a lot of porn I watch, despite the conspicuous absence of guys in most of it. :-)


11-16-12  03:13pm

Reply
168
N/A Reply of hodayathink's Reply

It's also possible, if fairly rare, to make it with three girls, two of whom have strap-ons, so there's always that option!
:-)


11-06-12  12:08pm

Reply
169
N/A Reply of messmer's Reply

But would someone still be able to reformat the drive without your True Crypt password?

(Sorry, but I just gotta up the paranoia ante--you can never be too careful!)


10-15-12  08:29pm

Reply
170
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

I have browsed a few VOD sites when looking for certain titles...only to stopped by the prospect of paying for such a terrible deal. Let me pay a flat rate, by the month or more, with unlimited, DRM-free downloads!

I'll "pay per minute" when I choose to sit and watch every minute of an entire video and I'm just giving up some time (and I suppose whatever shred of decency I might have left too :-) ).


09-01-12  09:05pm

Reply
171
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Reply

I find it even more fun to follow actors' dialogue when their first language isn't English and they're trying to deliver those riveting monologues we're so used to hearing in porn.

Unfortunately, I sometimes get the impression that some girls are not totally into it when they can barely even proposition their onscreen partner for some good ol' buttfuckin' because the language--never mind the guy's penis--is too much to handle.


08-29-12  01:10pm

Reply
172
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Reply

Wow. And you're right then, because that's a uniquely awful watermark.

08-25-12  02:36pm

Reply
173
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Reply

Is that possibly because they are only sample photos and not actual members' content?

08-25-12  12:32am

Reply
174
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I was thinking the same thing, and if we are used to reading right to left, top to bottom, then the last thing we will register on screen is the watermark (assuming small size, subdued color, etc.).

And this is one of the great things about higher res videos and pictures--the smaller the watermark. Of course, this is because they assume it's being viewed on a larger display and the watermark should be scaled accordingly. However, watch an older lower res video at full screen on a newer bigger display and those watermarks look ridiculous!


08-25-12  12:31am

Reply
175
Visit Hotkinkyjo

Hotkinkyjo
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Great review, rearadmiral!

Sucks this is streaming-only, though given the content (triple fisting! prolapse!!), it's probably better that this isn't saved on a hard drive for a future date when you're browsing your collection only to find out how perverted you truly are.

Still, the petite girls with the big insertion talents are always interesting...


07-23-12  08:47pm


Shown : 151-175 of 678 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.36 seconds.