| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
bestimmt (0)
|
DP is all hairy man ass. Disgusting. I want to see the girl, not the male prop.
|
11-06-12 01:04am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
hodayathink (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - bestimmt :
Then your issue is with the director, not the act. It is possible to film a DP without making it a constant close-up of the penetration.
|
11-06-12 01:12am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
Yes please, as long as it's not just male ass ;)
|
11-06-12 02:51am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - hodayathink :
Good point about the director. Great porn has to be great camera work. For most of us the day when we would settle for a few second glimpse of tit is long gone.
|
11-06-12 03:44am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - hodayathink :
I am not a fan of DP at all but the point was made well often times the camera work is just pathetic. Not to be mean, but I would guess if these guys sleep eat and drink their cameras how come they can not get focus right, angles right etc ? I see better work at times on Youtube then with these professionals,not to be on a rant but what the fuck do they do all day before the scenes? The directors and crew get paid to do a job and sure if you are new then there may be a learning curve but often the same people just make the same sloppy camera work. Porn should not be filmed like the Blair Witch Project was done Geees !
Ok i'm done LOL
|
11-06-12 08:12am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
I don't actively seek DP scenes out but if it has a female star that I like I'll usually download it anyway. My preference by far is one man and one woman - and that man needs to realize he's just a prop. If there is to be more than one male then bring in a bunch and turn it into a gang bang.
|
11-06-12 08:13am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
Since I've been tagged as the "inspiration" for this poll question, I think it is only fair that the source please step forward and explain how that came to be.
We're currently into the month of November, so an April-fool joke couldn't be at play here.
Ummm, could it be possible that it's such common knowledge 'round here that graymane has this intense distain for "double-penetration" an' the like, hence needs to be reminded there're other people on this planet who might like the stuff.
Whatever, I'm still curious how my name got associated with all this.
|
11-06-12 09:30am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - graymane :
We took a poll GM, and you were almost not picked by the popular vote, but the electoral votes put you in. LOL
I thought you made the poll that's interested and sounds ironic as well.
|
11-06-12 10:25am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
nastyboy7 (0)
|
I never enjoyed watching dp, but it seems to be almost as common as anal now in porn.
What's wrong with just good ol' vaginal sex. Another thing I can't stand is gangbangs. I don't care to watch gangbang scenes unless it's reverse gangbang, where there are multiple women fucking one guy.
|
11-06-12 12:03pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
turboshaft (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - hodayathink :
It's also possible, if fairly rare, to make it with three girls, two of whom have strap-ons, so there's always that option!
:-)
|
11-06-12 12:08pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Cybertoad :
You're right, Cybertoad, seeings as to how you put it, I suppose I am the guy. This is still the first I've heard about it, though.
Or for that matter, the first to even not remember.
So, I guess I'm due for another big meal of crow, you think?
For the sake of feigned dignity ....Blame it on fleeing brain cells.
I wonder sometimes if they know something I don't.
|
11-06-12 12:57pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #11 - graymane :
You know I was joking right GM ?
CT
|
11-06-12 01:03pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #7 - graymane :
graymane said: "Since I've been tagged as the "inspiration" for this poll question, I think it is only fair that the source please step forward and explain how that came to be."
It has been mentioned before, we rerun polls from time to time. When we re-run one submitted by a user, it's noted again. That's what happened here and perhaps why you don't recall it.
On this specific poll:
On 13-Feb-2011, you submitted a poll. That poll ran on 7-March-2011.
As you were notified (via email) at that time, "We had to re-word both the question and the answers but the question is basically what you asked." I don't have the exact wording of your original submission but the fact that this poll (both times it ran) say, "Inspired By" rather than "Submitted By" indicated the wording was changed significantly though the subject was retained.
So, to answer your direct question, YOU are the source but I was happy to explain how that came to be.
Thus, another of life's mysteries solved.
;-)
|
11-06-12 01:59pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
Toadsith (0)
|
REPLY TO #13 - Khan :
Oh! Oh! Please do Bigfoot next!
|
11-06-12 02:50pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
Toadsith (0)
|
Personally, I download DP scenes only if the models involved seem to be really into it. I know this is sort of a recurring comment of mine, but basically I don't have any interest in performers that don't show enthusiasm and instead appear to simply be going through the motions. Some models really seem to get into the outrageous nature of the act. For example: Jayna Oso (sadly now retired), Amber Rayne (be it performed with men or women), Veronica Avluv, Marilyn Chambers (she appears in all my lists, lol), and so on.
|
11-06-12 02:56pm
Reply To Message
|
16
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
Don't care for it. One hole at a time, is my preference.
|
11-06-12 03:26pm
Reply To Message
|
17
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
Well, let me add a little fire to the bonfire, I like DP that is sometimes characterized as "spit roasting" - mouth and one of the lower holes - and yes, care must be taken in the shooting of said piece for it to be note worthy of a download.
|
11-06-12 03:33pm
Reply To Message
|
18
|
Toadsith (0)
|
REPLY TO #17 - jberryl69 :
haha, I hate when that is classified as DP. If some dude says "I penetrated a chick last night", most guys would smack him upside the head if he later explained that he was referring to a blowjob. I guess it is the difference between what is technically true versus what is the culturally accepted definition.
|
11-06-12 04:08pm
Reply To Message
|
19
|
marcdc1 (0)
|
REPLY TO #15 - Toadsith :
Here, here!
I agree the performance makes the scene. Doesn't matter who the girl is, or what is being done if there isn't that spark - I'm not interested.
If that spark is there I don't care if its a masturbation shoot or a full on gangbang, it's gonna be great!
|
11-06-12 05:29pm
Reply To Message
|
20
|
pat362 (0)
|
I picked yes, somewhat but the number of good dp's is quite tiny vs the number of bad ones.
|
11-06-12 06:18pm
Reply To Message
|
21
|
slutty (0)
|
Don't really like it, too much going on, and too much man-ass.
|
11-06-12 08:38pm
Reply To Message
|
22
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #21 - slutty :
Ditto Slutty and the others. Last I checked DP requires two stunt cocks who are usually blocking (or, at least obstructing) the view of my interest in viewing porn; the babe's body parts.
The worst scene I've seen is a triple penetration with crossed swords in the cunt and one more up the shitter. (And yet another in her mouth.
The only thing that interested me was the contortion of the guys in the shot.
And I seriously doubt the babe got any enjoyment at all from the experience except when the cash was distributed when the torture was over.
|
11-06-12 11:10pm
Reply To Message
|
23
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
It's multitasking taken to one of its extremes.
|
11-07-12 02:08am
Reply To Message
|
24
|
Erlib (0)
|
I like it as much as anything. If there are two guys in there, they should at least try. It stops the arousal factor of the scene, but it's interesting to watch the attempt.
|
11-07-12 04:52pm
Reply To Message
|
25
|
Roister (0)
|
I like a pretty girl doing a reverse cowgirl DP. And the scene will usually end on a highpoint with two cocks being sucked and two loads on the face.
|
11-07-12 10:35pm
Reply To Message
|
26
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #18 - Toadsith :
Well, it does fit with my niche though I knew someone would object and I'm surprised it was only you. One of my favorite little French tarts, Tiffany Hopkins, always did such a nice job handling that.
|
11-08-12 01:11pm
Reply To Message
|
27
|
Toadsith (0)
|
REPLY TO #26 - jberryl69 :
You are very right that the "spit roast" (isn't it strange how often porn adopts food terminology?) requires a considerable amount of skill and finesse to be performed well. I guess my perscriptivist objection is I'd rather it be referred to as that (spit roast) or more specifically, I'd rather scenes with two males and a female that do not include the anal/vaginal penetration simply be called a threesome, or MMF if people like. Maybe it should be more accurately MFM, lol
|
11-08-12 08:12pm
Reply To Message
|
28
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #27 - Toadsith :
Well since it has an oral piece to it, Spit Roast would keep the spirit of the food association. I tend to get lost with acronyms so I'd be a little confuse my self as to the proper location of the letters.
Would MMF be a vag/anal 3 some and MFM a vag/anal -> mouth 3 some?
Or:
Would MMF be a DP & MFM be a SR?
Or:
... well you get the picture.
|
11-08-12 09:25pm
Reply To Message
|
29
|
Toadsith (0)
|
REPLY TO #28 - jberryl69 :
haha, the acronyms do get overwhelming at times. It took me months before I realized that ATM wasn't some sort of "More Money, More Blues" genre. New ones keep popping up, it is quite difficult to keep track of them all.
|
11-08-12 09:28pm
Reply To Message
|
