Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To be honest, with the Internet connections I've had over the years, combined with a practice of avoiding slower sites, I can't say that I've actually avoided a download because it was too big.
Of course I have reviewed files later and realized I have a 1 GB (or larger) video that I only really like half of and can't easily keep the parts I like. I guess I'm stuck between preferring whole videos and skipping through all the useless striptease and uninformative/creepy interview BS.
|
01-15-13 11:14pm
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't have cable, but I do have an LCD TV with a PS3 and a Netflix instant watch subscription (where they have a ton of older TV shows, though most are of no interest to me). Does any of what I watch on there count?
But I know next to nothing about any of the latest TV shows or series and I probably couldn't care any less if I ever did. :-)
|
12-28-12 09:04am
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, obviously not at the table during Christmas dinner, but about the same otherwise.
On a side note, I generally don't like holiday-themed porn. Maybe it's something about not wanting to associate Santa hats and tree decorating with threesomes and crazy cumshots, or I just don't get turned on by Christmas.
|
12-20-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I actually tried to smoke but it didn't stick--no cravings, stress, anything else that genuine smokers claim makes them continue to light up. That and I just didn't get anything out of it--almost every other "vice" I can think of has had some sort of effect on me physiologically or psychologically.
I have a pretty sensitive nose though and cigarettes can be one of the stinkier habits (of course so can something as "healthy" as eating seafood, which I also can't stand...), plus I'm a cheap bastard!
|
12-11-12 10:30pm
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'd love to direct, even if there was little-to-no pay.
But put myself in the scene? Hmm...though it would feel a little weird when I paid the girl afterwards (as opposed to before, like when you're on a date ;-) ).
|
11-27-12 06:59pm
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Boring!
Another one of those things I'd rather experience in person than watch in a video. Though to be fair this is true of a lot of porn I watch, despite the conspicuous absence of guys in most of it. :-)
|
11-16-12 03:13pm
|
Reply
157
|
N/A
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
It's also possible, if fairly rare, to make it with three girls, two of whom have strap-ons, so there's always that option!
:-)
|
11-06-12 12:08pm
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
But would someone still be able to reformat the drive without your True Crypt password?
(Sorry, but I just gotta up the paranoia ante--you can never be too careful!)
|
10-15-12 08:29pm
|
Reply
159
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I have browsed a few VOD sites when looking for certain titles...only to stopped by the prospect of paying for such a terrible deal. Let me pay a flat rate, by the month or more, with unlimited, DRM-free downloads!
I'll "pay per minute" when I choose to sit and watch every minute of an entire video and I'm just giving up some time (and I suppose whatever shred of decency I might have left too :-) ).
|
09-01-12 09:05pm
|
Reply
160
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
I find it even more fun to follow actors' dialogue when their first language isn't English and they're trying to deliver those riveting monologues we're so used to hearing in porn.
Unfortunately, I sometimes get the impression that some girls are not totally into it when they can barely even proposition their onscreen partner for some good ol' buttfuckin' because the language--never mind the guy's penis--is too much to handle.
|
08-29-12 01:10pm
|
Reply
161
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Wow. And you're right then, because that's a uniquely awful watermark.
|
08-25-12 02:36pm
|
Reply
162
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Is that possibly because they are only sample photos and not actual members' content?
|
08-25-12 12:32am
|
Reply
163
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I was thinking the same thing, and if we are used to reading right to left, top to bottom, then the last thing we will register on screen is the watermark (assuming small size, subdued color, etc.).
And this is one of the great things about higher res videos and pictures--the smaller the watermark. Of course, this is because they assume it's being viewed on a larger display and the watermark should be scaled accordingly. However, watch an older lower res video at full screen on a newer bigger display and those watermarks look ridiculous!
|
08-25-12 12:31am
|
Reply
164
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
It'd be pretty hard for a woman to be chunky elsewhere but have a toned stomach, not to mention the normal amount of body fat for a healthy woman can easily negate a tight stomach.
I'm more into the curvy, but not chunky, ass. ;-)
|
07-23-12 08:40pm
|
Reply
165
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I've heard that Verizon's FIOS has some of the fastest speeds available from the big ISPs, unfortunately their top speeds are not available everywhere and usually require the purchase of some sort of bundle (web+TV+phone).
I have AT&T's U-Verse with their 2nd fastest tier--the top one requires you to buy a cable package--and have to say it's met my needs. HD streaming, big downloads, and connectivity have always worked for me. At this point I'd probably be more pissed if my Internet connection went down before my other utilities.
: - )
|
05-24-12 03:13pm
|
Reply
166
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Since I haven't ever given marriage much thought I can't say that I have given much thought to swinging either. I figure if you want to introduce multiple partners to the relationship then marriage (monogamous, at least) may not be the best thing for you, and certainly not for your significant other.
Though what tangub wrote above certainly sounds like an attractive alternative--though admittedly I'll have to wait at least six or seven years to legally do the same!
|
04-11-12 10:56pm
|
Reply
167
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thomas20's Reply
Dave Mustaine has been writing political songs since his career began, though usually in a far more hostile way than openly endorsing a conservative candidate. Still, it pains me to see a truly accomplished metal guitarist like Mustaine get "reborn," or whatever he is now, and see no problem in saying something nice about a humorless character like Santorum.
Reminds me of Bill Hicks talking about people labeling rock "the devil's music," and that if there was a hell he'd rather spend an eternity in it because then at least it has the good music.
|
03-27-12 10:54pm
|
Reply
168
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Remember, "repression leads to obsession."
I blame our (the U.S.', anyway) history of religiosity for the reason society has become so hyper-sexualized, and one of the reasons porn has become as popular and accessible as it has.
To me the modern porn boom is one of the results of a culture's repressed and unhealthy view of sex and sexuality, not the cause of it, as the moral authoritarians would have us believe. The anti-porn crowd is really at its base anti-sex, and blames all of our modern ills on the sexual permissiveness that permeates our daily lives. This includes everything out there--from what people can find on the web, to the ads shown on TV, to all those unmarried women who choose to use birth control (the horror!).
It is still stigmatized in a way--just try staying in political office and see what happens when you begin making your own--but there's really no serious social backlash in most modern parts of the world, even in the more puritanical parts of the U.S. The forbidden fruit has long been out of the bag (if it ever was in there to begin with) and everyone's taking a bite. ;-)
|
03-27-12 10:41pm
|
Reply
169
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
On a more general note, and despite my love of nastier porn (minus Max Hardcore, of course), I actually get disgusted quite regularly.
It's just that I'm a picky perfectionist when it comes to porn, and I don't want anal scenes to be, uh, creamy, much less chunky (I've said too much!). I don't really like spitting or see the point--it's not lube, you fucking assholes! And yeah, that Timo guy, or whatever that dickhead's name is, really seems to get off on how much pain he can inflict on a girl's less-than-willing sphincter.
Come to think of it, I'm not much of a fan of hair either, but that's a whole different poll. ;-)
|
03-06-12 10:49pm
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I was just watching a little of one his videos the other day. I skipped through looking for something remotely entertaining, possibly sexy, but just couldn't stand it.
Never mind that his first order of business is to deep throat the girl until she is red in the face and vomits all over herself--I'm assuming he requires them to eat something beforehand--but just the fact that they look absolutely miserable, in pain, and not completely consenting is both a turn-off and also pisses me off. Woe to the poor girl who physically fights back (hint: he doesn't let that stand in the way of his boner assault :-O ).
He doesn't edit everything out, or just repeats a cut from a different angle, and you get a taste of just how much of an asshole he is performance wise, unless you consider fuck-her-until-she-screams "professional."
|
03-06-12 10:39pm
|
Reply
171
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I don't think many lawmakers argue for "preserving mystique" when it comes to defending most legislation, especially public nudity/indecency laws. Granted, I personally think politicians are professional bullshitters so the issue is kind of moot. :-)
Still, beyond the standard squawks of the puritanical outragers I don't see any reasonable, rational argument for separate laws for the sexes in terms of public dress. I could understand more stringent laws for children for safety reasons but the opposite usually seems to be true (up to a point, of course). Try letting your girlfriend stroll around in a diaper or just totally nude down at a public beach and see what happens...
Private property is totally different so the sky--or your personal courage to get naked--is the limit in those places. Interestingly, in the U.S. it seems "public nudity" is really only legal in private places that explicitly allow it. Go figure.
|
02-24-12 01:28am
|
Reply
172
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'm not sure what makes a sexy guy, but I'm betting it's pretty close to the opposite of whatever I've been doing! :-(
|
02-17-12 10:24pm
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, and I don't even like most well-known porn stars either.
|
02-08-12 08:55pm
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
10-25%, as I don't have a TV but I do subscribe to Netflix's Instant Watch and watch other shows on the web (there's a ton of current programming that's streamed both legally and for free). Also I'm a downloading fiend, so I browse through a site and queue up my DownloadThemAll Firefox add-on (also free :-)) while I read or watch something else online. The little 'ding' sound when a download completes is always music to my ears!
However when I'm offline and sorting through my hard drive contents I waste/spend a lot of time on porn.
|
02-04-12 03:18pm
|
Reply
175
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely pickier--in a perverted sort of way--and proud of it! ;-)
I'm not sure what "smarter" could mean here though, maybe someone who knows how to get the most bang for their buck, so to speak. I'm not much for the more popular/mainstream sites out there, whatever they may be, but I seriously doubt I'd be interested in joining any of them. I guess this is why most porn "stars" are of no interest to me either, and when someone refers to something like "Playboy" or even "[ignore]Penthouse[/ignore]" as porn I just laugh.
|
02-03-12 03:49am
|