| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
251
|
Panty Pops
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-USA porn stars trying on panties but rarely having sex.
-Cumshot always on panties/ass/back of model.
-100% exclusive original unique content.
-Some big names, like Courtney Cummz or Jenna Haze (2 scenes).
-Some attempts at reality porn: simple scripts and locations.
-60+ videos. WMV or Quicktime in various resolutions.
-Max resolution: 65% 854x480 2000kbps; 35% 640x480 1000kbps.
-Video length varies a lot: from 4 up to 30 minutes.
-18 photo galleries: 75% 1200x800; 25% 600x400.
-100 pictures on average per set; 50% landscape, 50% portrait.
-Full access to other sites from this company (not updating).
-Free tour lists all updates with release date and trailer.
-ccbill. |
| Cons: |
-Erratic updates: 1 in Jan/09, 1 in Feb/09, 3 in Mar/09.
-Very little pussy penetration: handjob or blowjob at most.
-For a panties site, there's too much emphasis on blowjobs.
-Very few of the models masturbate; lots of panty touching.
-Most scenes are POV; last scene had a cameraman, though.
-Always the same guy; he talks a lot.
-Guy often jerks himself off for a long time to finish scene.
-Not enough panty variety: same panties in some scenes.
-Panties not always match bra; most of the time, no bra at all.
-Regional pricing. |
| Bottom Line: |
I came across Panty Pops while browsing the Panties niche section here. I'll try to join some of the sites but this was the first one, mainly because I knew most of the USA stars, it had a low price and network access. Scenes are always very similar: there's a model and a pile of a dozen panties; she teasingly tries on some of them, following instructions from the guy that is filming her; the guy takes out his cock and some blowjob and cock-panties interaction ensues. Absolutely no penetration except a handful of scenes.
I don't get why there's so little penetration. It's not that the site is deceiving since it's true to its name: the guy eventually pops on the panties and ass, with the model always lying flat on her stomach. It's the fact that all models are seasoned porn stars who have done lots of regular boy-girl scenes. It looks weird to see the guy not pull the panties apart and get down to business. That's what I was hoping to see but it happens in less than 10% of the scenes. On the other hand, almost every scene contains some blowjob. Since this site seems to be a one man job (performing, filming, editing, etc), I couldn't help but think it is just an excuse for this guy to enjoy some quality time with a few USA porn stars. Are blowjob-only rates lower?
Another thing I found weird was the panties reuse from scene to scene. Looks like the guy buys them by the dozen at Victoria's Secret (lots have the Pink collection logo) but he makes them last for several scenes; many of them are tried on by 4 or 5 different models. It looks cheap since they are probably bought for less than 5 USD each; it also brings a sense of déja vu. Models must have some panties of their own: why not ask the models to bring them on set and try them on camera? That would bring a higher variety of panties to the scenes and they may also have matching bras.
Despite its shortcomings, I feel the content is very unique, the cast is often stellar and it's more than decently produced and packaged to recommend it to anyone interested in this niche. Don't expect much from the other sites in the network: they are no longer updating; there were also a couple more sites that have been taken down and are not accessible any more. |
|
04-04-09 10:51am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
252
|
Day With A Pornstar
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
The vast majority of Brazzer's Pass current sites cater for the "white porn star with big fake boobs fucked by big cock" niche. It looks like most criticism to Brazzer's Pass for creating Mofos Network has been for the couple sites that overlap with typical Brazzer's Pass content. Day With A Pornstar is perhaps the best example but Can She Take It also has the same problem.
Mofos Network minus this couple sites becomes a different network geared towards other niches like real legal teens (College Bash or Teens At Work) and interracial (Mofos Worldwide or Milfs Like It Black).
Looking at the stars that have the most scenes at Mofos Network it also looks like they are looking for something different: most girls are much younger and have natural tits. There's also a higher percentage of asian or black stars.
So, my wild guess is they want to focus Brazzer's Pass on what they are best known for and try to make something different at Mofos Network.
|
04-04-09 03:50am
|
Comment
253
|
Day With A Pornstar
(0)
|
|
04-03-09 01:52pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Never. I won't say I've never had some free porn but certainly not from those sites: I've only been to something that may qualify as a "Tube" site a couple times and by mere accident while doing some google search.
|
03-27-09 01:42pm
|
Reply
255
|
Mili Jay.net
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Looks like the site has a decent amount of content, at least. I believe all sites in this network are as deceiving. I did a review for Simply Tory Lane some time ago.
Looks like they set up domain names with the models' names as mere bait. Seeing the "network" as a whole, there's some worth in it but, site by site, there's very little in any of them.
|
03-25-09 01:53pm
|
Reply
256
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
conflicted's Reply
I don't recall the exact site but, at that time, I was also checking I'm Live and Flirt 4 Free. One of those two sites should have some overlap with this one.
|
03-21-09 10:37am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Netsirk's News
I've only done a few searches but it looks really neat. There are lots of categories and results are usually appropriate.
I have several doubts and comments though.
Zip files of big galleries contain always only around 25 images; is this sampling intentional? The vast majority of sites that offer zip files mean whole gallery download;
Biggest images are only 1024 on the longest axis; that's a bit too low nowadays; are there any plans to offer higher resolutions?
It looks like picture count for scenes coming from DVDs usually includes both screen captures and true photos; it's a bit frustrating to open a gallery hoping to find 300 images and find only 8. Check, for instance, galleries for "Swallow My Sperm P.O.V. 2";
Gallery slideshow is nicely implemented but I believe it would make much more sense to change the orientation of thumbnails and slideshows to portrait or choose landscape images for the slideshow; those empty spaces and cropped pictures look a bit weird. I've been browsing the softcore section mainly; looks like there are other sections that don't suffer from empty spaces and cropped images.
Nice work, anyway.
|
03-16-09 03:43pm
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Enter this in the Google search box:
site:pornusers.com "Avg Site Rating"
It's pretty simple: you limit the search to a specific site and search for a unique string. As a bonus, in this case I got all the information I wanted in the description right at the results page.
|
03-15-09 02:46am
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
Currently, 75.3. I submitted the poll because I realized I have been going slightly up and down 75 since the very beginning. In fact, I submitted the poll before my recent VideoBox review when I was at 74.8.
There's no big point I want to proof here. As Drooler said, those who review both good and bad experiences (me too) will likely have lower averages.
On a side note, the intervals I wanted to submit initially were much wider. But I did a quick Google search of cached user profiles and I realized that, if you leave one-timers aside, those 4 intervals should get around 25% each. Let's see :)
|
03-15-09 01:22am
|
Comment
260
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
|
03-14-09 04:46am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
261
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
03-12-09 02:39pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
262
|
CFNM Secret
(0)
|
|
03-09-09 03:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
263
|
I Just Fucked My Best Friend's Mom
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Not a member but it looks like the scenes come from Red Light's Momma Knows Best DVD series. According to iafd, there are at least 8 issues in the series.
|
03-08-09 12:23pm
|
Comment
264
|
Torente XXX
(0)
|
|
03-08-09 06:36am
Replies (2)
|
Review
265
|
VideoBox
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Will reach 6,000 DVDs next week.
-5 new DVDs every single day.
-Simple, informative, easy to use website.
-Useful personalization: favorites, custom lists, ratings.
-Great downloads: no limit, top speed, links are valid for weeks.
-Easily create custom clips from any scene.
-Various resolutions. Max: 720x480, around 4000kbps.
-Great streaming: trend-setting flash player with thumbnails.
-No watermarks on videos (except for some studios).
-Free tour shows all the available update info.
-Good percentage of fairly recent releases.
-Great series locator.
-No need to login every time.
-ccbill. TBP discount. |
| Cons: |
-Regional pricing.
-No divx video option. Only WMV.
-Weak star naming: missing or partial names abound.
-Star list doesn't list all available performers.
-Does not tell apart stars with same name (Lucy Lee, Cherokee).
-Categorization is too broad: only 40 possible keywords.
-No info on directors or male performers.
-Movie production date is not listed.
-Some repeated scenes: original movie and compilation.
-User comments rarely bring anything new.
-Transsexual or hentai DVDs released as regular updates. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn't aware that VideoBox existed a year ago when I came across Porn Users. At that time, I believe it was the top 1 site among PUs but its popularity has recently been dwindling. This is the only DVD site I've ever joined but I believe they do lots of things right. Every PU should join VideoBox at least once.
I've got basically one con: VideoBox metadata is crappy. Google wouldn't be so successful if they indexed the whole Internet but you could only enter a limited set of keywords to find documents or if they left out half the words when indexing. VideoBox should be looking into this because some competitors have also realized that VideoBox metadata and search engine is its weakest asset.
Despite this fact, VideoBox was close to a dream come true for me. During the last couple weeks I decided to look for scenes where the model kept the panties on until the end. Unfortunately, Fetish was the only somewhat useful keyword among the 40 categories. Panties or Clothes keywords would certainly have been welcome because Fetish gave me lots of BDSM which wasn't exactly what I was looking for.
I was forced to browse through the whole collection picking titles here and there that looked promising and using the 6 thumbnails or the streaming option to see if a scene fit the profile. Jumping to other DVDs in the series was easy but director info would have for sure been useful. I eventually came across Intense Industries studio which had lots of them.
I'm no longer a member but still visit VideoBox on a weekly basis. Their free tour works almost exactly like the members area except for the video download and streaming options. I just browse the recent DVDs in my still ongoing quest. Sooner or later, I'll join back. |
|
03-07-09 10:21am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
266
|
Priest Damian
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Torbe is quite a celebrity here in Spain. He has even made a couple cameos in mainstream movies and had a recurring collaboration in a national TV show. It all started with a blog about porn and his experiences with whores called "puta locura" (fucking madness or, literally, bitch madness).
As for your question, I'm not a member but I found an update log at the "puta locura" site. It looks Padre Damián aka Priest Damian was updating once a month in 2008 but the last episode is from Jan-02-2009. I believe there should be 19 episodes so far. The whole network seems to be currently updating several times a week.
|
03-07-09 02:33am
|
Reply
267
|
Naughty Nati
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
My guess is that, if she is now known by Allie Sin and has been appearing at various porn sites and DVDs, most likely this site was only active prior to starting her full-fledged porn career. Probably the solo site didn't work as expected and she decided to jump into porn with a new stage name.
In my experience, that's the usual reason why a porn star has a site with a different name.
|
03-04-09 01:47pm
|
Reply
268
|
Enter Nautica
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks for the tip. Pity webcam times on all sites, with no exceptions, are always fatal for European PUs.
I believe Nautica Thorn does cam shows but I doubt they come close and there's no schedule at all. There were some recorded shows: I recall one with Eva Angelina.
|
03-03-09 11:46am
|
Reply
269
|
Enter Nautica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
There are exceptions but you are right that most porn star sites are a letdown.
In this case, Nautica Thorn is for sure still involved with the site but updates are so erratic and the site is so unusable that only die-hard fans will appreciate it.
|
03-02-09 11:01am
|
Reply
270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I believe Uncle Jessie is probably a reference only American PUs might understand.
I googled it and the only near match I could find is a character named "Uncle Jesse" in "The Dukes of Hazzard" TV series. With all due respect to the actor who played him, he is, in fact, an old man.
|
03-02-09 10:59am
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
As long as they don't pretend to be underage and there's no abuse, I'd say "why not?".
The previews I've seen for Jurassic Cock have me seriously considering signing back for Porn Pros Network.
|
03-01-09 01:26am
|
Reply
272
|
Enter Nautica
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
I always tend to go the Occam's Razor way: it's probably the girl writing it. But, believe me, in this case, it doesn't matter: it's just an endless account of sex adventures with all the details.
I mean, whether it's her or an assistant writing it and whether the sex adventures are for real or totally made up doesn't make a difference: what's the point of reading about the detailed sex life of a porn star when you've seen her having sex in HD a dozen times? I feel it's a thousand times more interesting the few times she talks about her work.
|
02-28-09 02:53pm
|
Comment
273
|
Real Ex Girlfriends
(0)
|
|
02-28-09 02:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
274
|
Enter Nautica
(0)
66.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official site of US porn star Nautica Thorn.
-Exotic, petite, all natural, zero tattoos, zero piercings.
-Around 60 photo galleries. 80% solo glamour. Some boy-girl from movies.
-Around 20 videos: recorded webcam shows, movie scenes, BTS from movies.
-Model is certainly involved with the site.
-She may have done webcam shows recently.
-Interaction with the model only through her frequently updated blog.
-Rare dildo anal attempt: 2 minutes video; very bad picture quality. |
| Cons: |
-Updates are not dated or highlighted: hard to tell if there are any.
-Zero categorization and organization. Extremely unpleasant to use.
-Hard to tell the exact amount of content.
-HTML pages were really slow and unresponsive at times.
-90% of the pictures are 1000x700 or lower. No ZIP files.
-Large galleries are repetitive: too many similar photos.
-Landscape pictures are often as wide as portrait ones.
-Videos: 50% 320x240; 50% 720x480. Low bitrates: 700kbps average.
-Most videos come from her movies or webcam shows. |
| Bottom Line: |
I believe I had never payed much attention to Nautica Thorn until I found a scene of hers I really liked at a DVD site. I decided to join this site after I checked the free blog here and it looked like she was really involved and was ceaselessly pumping into it BTS content from the movies she directs.
This site uses the worst ever color combination of text and background: some of the text is simply unreadable. Pair this fact with a decade old content engine that mixes in a single section all videos and photo sets and forces you to click, click and eventually choose from a drop down list to get to the higher resolution and you get one of the most unpleasant sites around. I believe there were some updates while I was a member but they showed up mixed within the chaos, probably marked with a "new" sign in the same color as the background. I only knew there was one update because she mentioned it at her blog.
The only part that is for sure being updated is the diary/blog. There were a couple updates a week in January but they were mainly long entries about her sentimental and sex life. There seemed to be quite a few members who liked this feature but the problem is she doesn't use a single line break: try reading a diary entry with 60 sentences with no line breaks without being a die-hard fan; I couldn't go past the first couple sentences. The blog is hosted on wordpress and all members must use the same login and password written on the site to access it. Pretty sloppy.
Picture quality in images and videos is poor. Some of the picture galleries can be salvaged even though they are probably simply unedited sessions for the DVDs but videos look more like teasers for the movie. She has the looks, puts up great performances and knows her job but, at such low bitrates, it's just impossible to get into it.
All in all, I am not sure I'd recommend this site even to Nautica Thorn fans: you'll sure appreciate the limited interaction and the few BTS content but you may end up so fed up with the site's cumbersomeness that you'll never want to hear from her again. |
|
02-28-09 12:14pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
275
|
White's Anatomy
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Review
Thanks for reviewing this site. I was once on the verge of signing up and you have confirmed my suspicions. Network access looks interesting, though.
I'm not an expert but, regarding the zip files not working, you may try repairing them with a standalone compression software like winzip or winrar (both have free trial options).
|
02-28-09 11:04am
|
