Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Currently, I see no indication inside members' area (new or old) regarding Full HD quality being offered.
|
07-19-09 01:37pm
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Rarely I'm a member of more than one site at a time so I usually type because Firefox has two handy features: autocomplete and a list of most visited sites. I start typing the first times I visit and it soon becomes one of the most visited sites and I just choose from the drop-down list from then on.
Occasionally, I keep the various sites I'm a member in a bookmark folder so I can open all of them in tabs with a single mouse click.
|
07-15-09 01:27pm
|
Reply
203
|
Porno 4 Portables
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
You are not the only one who feels this way. Here's a forum thread where people voice similar opinions:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=520
|
07-11-09 09:21am
|
Reply
204
|
Pornstar.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks for the info. Since the stars listed are long time retired, I wouldn't completely rule out the possibility the sites are official: official sites are rarely good but the ones from retired stars are usually the most officially bad ones.
|
07-11-09 03:56am
|
Comment
205
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
|
07-11-09 03:34am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
206
|
Pornstar.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
When you say screencaps do you mean you get the promo pictures of the shoots or just frames from the movie? The free tour seems to suggest promo stills shot with a photo camera while filming the scene.
There isn't any info on the tour regarding the number of DVDs ("1,000s" could be just 1,000?). The samples don't seem to be exclusive: there are probably other sites that have most of the videos and better search engine.
The free tour also says you get access to 8 solo sites including ones for Kobe Tai or Racquel Darrian. Did you get to those sites? Are those the official sites?
|
07-11-09 01:52am
|
Reply
207
|
Sandee Westgate
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
As I stated in the review, this site does everything I believe a solo model site should do : new videos and pictures every week, weekly cam shows, more interaction than you can handle, even a 24/7 spy cam, ... The content is highly professional and Sandee Westgate keeps slowly rising her limits over the years. I considered scoring it even higher.
Given the sorry state of the majority of solo sites around I don't think scoring this site in the 90s is undeserved. If there's an up and running solo website that is the absolute perfection and, so, deserves a 100, I doubt it does things much differently than this one.
|
06-24-09 02:19pm
|
Review
208
|
Sandee Westgate
(0)
92.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-Official site of US model Sandee Westgate.
-Ellaborate shoots at high end locations. Great stylism.
-Solo sets usually include spreads, fingering, dildo play.
-290 solo galleries. 60 girl-girl sets with known models.
-Photos: 40% 1200x800, 60% 1050x700. 75% portrait.
-150 solo videos. 16 girl-girl ("Sandee's Girls" series).
-Latest videos at 960x544, 4800 kbps, 5 minutes.
-Great involvement of the model in the site.
-24/7 office spy cam. Occasional interaction with camera.
-Release date and small description on most update lists.
-No longer DRM. Used to be in the past.
Current Weekly Update Rate
-1 1200x800 photo gallery, 1 video clip.
-1 webcam chat Camz.com. Previous ones are archived.
-Active in the site's free forum and blog/twitter. |
Cons: |
-Site navigation is a bit confusing. Too much categories.
-Color combination is a bit extreme. Too dark colors.
-Big 160x180 watermark on photos.
-No search engine; no metadata for sets.
-Her boy-girl videos are now only available as PPV.
-Model recently got a huge tattoo all over her right side.
-Video editing: slow motion, disco music don't mix well.
-Following her (Twitter, Myspace, etc) is a full-time job. |
Bottom Line: |
I was a member for a couple months about 3 years ago. My enthusiasm for the model diminished gradually but I left with the impression this was a great site. I'd been meaning to join back for some time so, when Sandee Westgate put a very convincing sales pitch for her site at a reality porn network forum, I took the plunge.
In my humble opinion, this site is one of the best solo sites. Since it goes back to my early days of perusing the adult net, I could even say it's one of the few sites that's shaped what I currently expect from a solo model site in terms of update rate and interaction. I'm no longer nuts about the model's looks (her new huge side tattoo is... huge) but she's no doubt a hottie and cares to offer a more than decent product and lots of interaction.
I really like the attention to details in the latest picture sets both in styling and posing but I feel they should do something about the editing style of videos. They make it up in the "Sandee's Girls" series: big names, short candid intro interviews and no music throughout the scene. Unfortunately, there's no set schedule for this series and updates aren't dated.
At some point during this last years, they got rid of DRM. They've also moved to a PPV section some boy-girl scenes Sandee Westgate did with her (former?) boyfriend. Most of the old content shows its age but there are some great classic photo sets although not all are available in zip format.
This site really would benefit from a search engine. Having over 350 photo galleries and not being able to filter out/in those where she is posing outdoors, in a brown bikini, using a dildo or posing outdoors in a brown bikini using a dildo will make you miss the sets you would enjoy the most. There are already some small descriptions in some of the update lists so they have some of the work already done. |
|
06-24-09 04:56am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
209
|
Matrix Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Try Matrix HD instead. The site has the same look but the join page works. I read somewhere some time ago that they were planning to make Matrix HD their consumer site instead of Matrix Nudes.
|
06-20-09 05:19am
|
Comment
210
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
|
06-15-09 03:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
211
|
TS Kimber James
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
I don't know now but Kimber James did look feminine before with the darker hair. I didn't suspect anything when I saw the first photo of Kimber James at Christian's blog about a year ago where he introduced the photo simply as "a girl I worked with" leaving aside the TS factor. I see Christian's done several scenes at this site.
|
06-12-09 10:26am
|
Reply
212
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Never been a member of this site but I often use Firefox's DownThemAll and I occasionally get the file mismatch error at other sites. Even for large video files I rarely lose any data: it's nothing but the hassle of having to restart a paused download a couple times. Perhaps a Firefox specific forum or a generic question at the forum here might get you some answers.
|
06-08-09 02:06pm
|
Reply
213
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
The free tour page you've seen lists everything that is available inside. To their credit, it's also worth mentioning they clearly separate the three types of videos: behind the scenes, candids and sexy videos. This is something not all sites do.
I grabbed a couple of the behind the scenes videos and they are a bit peculiar: there's a lot of editing showing shoot preparation and the model while posing for the camera but also some stills from the shoot. A bit unusual but quite well done. Keep in mind that I do like behind the scenes material.
Even though, as I said, I feel photos are the strongest point of the site.
|
06-08-09 01:28pm
|
Reply
214
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
It's still updating 3 photo sets per week on average although it looks like one of them is usually just magazine scans. Latest sets are being released at 2000x1333.
The galleries section of the free tour shows everything you'll find inside.
|
06-07-09 01:20pm
|
Comment
215
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
|
06-07-09 11:24am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
216
|
Naked Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Glad that you gave the site a try despite my somewhat harsh review; perhaps it ended up being more discouraging than I intended.
I still think Naked Movie has a lot of room for improvement, although it might be simply a budget issue. I believe girls don't get more non-sex screen time for purely economical reasons: an hour of a female porn star is much more expensive than half a day of your buddy improvising in front of a camera. In the end, I'd rather see a one-minute intro with the girl than a 15-minute one filled with not so funny guys.
|
06-07-09 10:23am
|
Comment
217
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
06-07-09 09:00am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
This wikipedia article pretty seems accurate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer
Don't know what part of it is a myth. I remember some gang bang (Houston 500?) where there were fluffers on film keeping the guys ready. I also remember a fluffer character in some porn movie parodying the porn industry.
|
06-07-09 08:34am
|
Reply
219
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
If you go to Dancing Bear home page, the tech support site is aprosupport dot com. Bangbros Network support site home page has a big email address at aprosupport dot com.
It could very well be Bangbros Network is trying to launch a second network like other reality networks have done in recent months.
|
06-01-09 02:43pm
|
Reply
220
|
Sandee Westgate
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Let me friendly disagree with the videos being non-exclusive. I was a member less than a month ago and, among the 150+ ones I managed to download (almost all the ones with Sandee in it), I'd say 85-90% of them are exclusive to this site. There are some with watermarks from Digital Desire, Marquis Models, Suze Randall or 24 Main Street but the vast majority look exclusive.
Regarding the spy cam, maybe it's a matter of timing. Living in Europe, I couldn't attend the regular chats because of the time differences but I was able to see Sandee Westgate sitting at her computer on the spy cam very often at what I believe were 10-12 AM PST. I once caught her flashing her tits and interacting with the spy cam although, according to what someone at the chat who seemed to be a regular member said afterwards, it's a pretty rare behavior.
|
06-01-09 12:23pm
|
Comment
221
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
|
05-31-09 03:43am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
222
|
Kelly Divine
(0)
|
|
05-23-09 01:28am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Membership alone $31 to $35 which was a US site regional pricing at 25 EUR. I'm guessing the poll is leaving aside cam sites; otherwise I'd be at $41 or more.
|
05-18-09 11:23am
|
Reply
224
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I don't know if it's the same that is happening to you but I got stuck with the Home Made Movies membership the first time I bought credits. This membership was recurring (although it was 29.99 USD) and it gave you access to the videos the performers record.
I was able to get a fast cancellation by sending an email to the Customer Service email that might be located from the Customer Service link at the top of each page. I canceled immediately after joining by mistake and didn't get any rebill.
|
05-18-09 11:06am
|
Review
225
|
Naked Movie
(0)
65.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-Spoofs of movies, TV series. 5 episodes as of Jan/2009.
-Bigger budget and more elaborate settings than usual.
-A respectable effort to try something different.
-Some episodes have 2 sex scenes. Up to 60 minutes.
-Star Trix. Unfortunately, the only passable episode.
-Jayden Jaymes as a green alien.
-The bottom-less party at Farold and Fubar.
-Access through Muffia. Check my review for specs. |
Cons: |
-Too few updates. Only two new scenes since Jan/2009.
-Most scripts are terrible. Probably, non-existent.
-Extremely long non-sex intros with male performers only.
-All scenes are boy-girl only. No threesomes, no girl-girl.
-Female models get very little screen time: sex scene only.
-Too many second-rate male performers in sex scenes.
-Most acting is extremely bad. Over-acting is commonplace.
-Hard to follow: everyone improvises, talks at the same time.
-Scenes in real life settings: bad lighting, bad sound. |
Bottom Line: |
Porn history in one sentence: from features to gonzo to internet reality. If Muffia wants to reinvent the wheel by going back to features, the least they can do is make it round. What I remember from features is that the girls got most of the screen time both on sex scenes and non-sex scenes, some of them were passable actresses and the guys were always the same but did a good job.
At Naked Movie, the girls only show up for the sex scene. In the rare cases they get some lines, it's obvious they weren't casted for their acting abilities. Guys get 99% of the dialog in non-sex scenes but male casting isn't that good. Ramon has proven a hundred times he's a solid performer but his acting is always debatable and he isn't much better here in the Miami Spice (Miami Vice spoof) episode as a latino drug lord. You get the contrary at Farold And Fubar: a couple of unknown guys deliver slightly passable acting but they aren't up to the task when it comes to the sex scenes even though they are paired with Riley Shy and Kaci Starr. Probably that's the reason why you always got the same guys in feature movies: it's hard to find someone who can act and perform.
Some things might be salvaged, though. The pool sex scene with Kitty Bella and Ramon at Miami Spice is worth watching; pity they are such terrible actors in the non-sex part. The guy that plays the USS Intercourse captain in Star Trix (Star Trek spoof) is passably funny and delivers a decent sex scene with Jayden Jaymes; the whole episode is quite OK. Farold and Fubar shows a bottomless party with several relatively known female models (Jada Fire, Louisa Lanewood, Nika Noire, Nikki Rhodes or Ricki White); unfortunately, you don't get a bottomless lesbian scene but two simultaneous and equally terrible boy-girl sex scenes.
From what I see in the free tour, they seem to have released only two new episodes since I was a member 5 months ago. A promising 2-scene spoof of Ghost Busters (aptly titled Nut Busters) with a stellar cast (Gianna Michaels, Rachel Roxxx, Rachel Starr, Shyla Stylez, Voodoo) and a new 1-scene episode of Star Trix, probably to ride on the wave of the recent JJ Abrams' Star Trek. Miami Spice episode ended with a cliff-hanger "To be continued..." but, according to the free tour, they haven't released more episodes.
I'm not saying you should stay clear from this site. They should, at least, be praised for trying. It's unlikely anyone will join Muffia for this site alone but if you enjoyed some of the original movies/TV series, you might catch some of the ironies (if such ironies exist). If you are more fluent in English than me, you will likely understand them under bad sound conditions. |
|
05-17-09 08:48am
Replies (1)
|