| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Jesse Capelli
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for the Planet Anita heads up. I believe it should have almost the same content and at the same resolutions that eventually appear at Club Anita. Someone at the Club Anita forums complained, though, that Planet Anita had much more BTS/personal material than Club Anita. It certainly has a real diary updated more often and with more meaningful entries although it is already available in the free section.
Planet Anita, at least, doesn't try to fool you in the website tour: I feel that what you get once you join is what you see in the free section.
Very few of the Glamour Models Gone Bad are alive and kicking and the website tours are specially misleading: they look super cool and promise great content and interaction with the model but, once inside, you get a very old looking design, questionable quality and the promised interaction with the model is a bad joke. Apart from the ones you say, Club Charlie (Charlie Laine) still seems to live up to the promises.
|
05-04-08 01:58pm
|
Reply
202
|
Jesse Capelli
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
That could make things worse and the site might not have received more than a handful of updates in 4 years. That could explain also why most videos are MPEG. I am not familiar with the model and I had never seen any of the galleries so I couldn't really tell what year exactly they were taken.
I assumed most of the content had been uploaded together in 2006 because one of the latest galleries was from her "new movie"; I looked up the title and it had been released in 2006. All the preceding updates had almost the same day and month and that's why I thought they all might be part of the original content.
Anyway, whether they are from 2004 or 2006, anyone joining should not expect any recent content.
|
05-04-08 01:53pm
|
Comment
203
|
Jesse Capelli
(0)
|
|
05-04-08 12:03pm
Replies (7)
|
Comment
204
|
Jessica Drake
(0)
|
|
02-06-10 01:29am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
205
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
After checking the blog and the previews in the free section, I'm pretty sure the site is consistently updating at the same rate and in the same style as always. AFAIK, Jessica Jaymes has been focusing a lot on her site in recent years so, IMHO, the fact that not many scenes of hers for other companies come up shouldn't be an indicator of the quality of this site.
|
10-17-12 03:05pm
|
Review
206
|
Jordan Carver
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Official site of huge boobed German model Jordan Carver.
- Slim figure, no tattoos or piercings.
- All content is non-nude, solo, pin up style, often humorous.
- Most content is exclusive and looks professionally shot.
- Nice choice of big sized bras and bikinis.
- Interesting locations: nature, industrial settings, mansions.
- 70+ photo galleries. 25 photos per set. 65% portrait.
- 80% at least at 1920x1280 resolution. Few at less than 1500x1000.
- Separate candid (50+ galleries) and BTS (25+) sections.
- 20+ HD streaming videos. Available at up to 1280x720.
- Vignette style videos. A few have some kind of script.
- Occasional promotions, like iPad raffle for new users at Christmas.
- Meet and greet with fans in real life.
- Billed by ccbill. Lower price when recurring. |
| Cons: |
- Update schedule not clear. Updates are not dated either.
- Photo sets are not available in zip format for download.
- Lighting in some photo sets isn’t stellar.
- No link between photos and video from same set.
- Videos are streaming only. Hosted at Vimeo.
- Background music and slow motion segments in all videos.
- Members may leave comments on updates only at a public blog.
- No user forum, or chats but model is active in social networks.
- Not all sets were available in HI-RES in the past.
- Regional pricing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the official site of Jordan Carver, a relatively slim but very big boobed model from Germany who, I believe, currently lives in the US. No tattoos or piercings. I think it’s inevitable to compare it with Denise Milani’s now defunct site. This site is pretty similar, both in model looks and type of content even though I’d have preferred this one to have a clearer update schedule and be able to download videos. Jordan Carver’s only adult work outside her site seems to be also the occasional photo shoot for Pinup Files, which are also available here.
I was a member of the site right at the beginning and also nine months later. At first, they had no videos and had a weird policy of not offering high resolution photos of all sets right away but had them available in low resolution for a couple weeks before releasing them in zip format and at higher resolution; they claimed this was to thwart piracy. A year later, the site was much more professional looking, videos were being offered (although few and streaming only) and they had all sets at a decent 1920x1280 resolution from day one albeit zip files were no longer being offered.
Content is strictly non-nude, meaning the model may get fully undressed but nipples or pubic region always stay covered by hands, garment or prop. There’s always some kind of humor in the photo sets and specially in the candids and BTS photos; there are just as much regular photo sets as candids and BTS combined. It would have been nice to have regular sets linked to their BTS / candid set and video (those few that have a matching video).
They put a lot of work into editing and shooting the videos but maybe they push a bit too far the artsy part. There’s always background music, not really obtrusive since the model just poses but it’s hard to hear what the model says; she does speak in some of them. They also abuse of slow motion and black and white segments. I also didn’t get why some of the scripted videos revolved around the model being in danger, like being kidnapped or stalked. It looked cheap to me that they use Vimeo to host their videos; as far as I know, that’s a free video hosting service.
It also looked cheap that they used a blog at Blogger for members’ comments on updates. There aren’t any webcam chats or members’ forum but they had a few funny video diaries on site. Jordan Carver was also active on facebook and twitter. |
|
07-03-11 09:05am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
207
|
Karlie Montana
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
As I said, I got the feeling not much care was put into this site's design. Regardless, if Karlie Montana made regular use of the features at hand, fans of hers would get their money's worth.
For instance, that exact content engine is used at Jessica Drake but jessica drake seems to be working on her site several times a day (blogs, travel pictures, comments, Wicked Pictures movie stills or whatever). The site is as ugly, cumbersome and download-unfriendly as this one but her fans have good reasons to check in on a daily basis.
In any case, I'd still recommend the trial to Karlie Montana to anyone who's had a thing for the model at some point; I feel her "nutty" personality is one of her main appeals and it shows a lot here.
|
05-12-09 11:26am
|
Review
208
|
Karlie Montana
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official site of US porn star Karlie Montana.
-Great looks and interesting personality.
-40+ videos. Up to 720x480, 1400 kbps, 10 minutes average.
-Also available in medium and low resolution. All streaming only.
-Lots of behind the scenes content: interviews, goofing around.
-75+ galleries. 50%, 1024x700. 40%, 2000x3000 or higher.
-Mostly solo (non-sex or masturbation) and some girl-girl.
-Model interaction: internal messaging, blog, audio blog, chats.
-Users may add comments to photos, videos, blogs, etc.
-Current update rate: 2 videos and 4 photo galleries per month.
-Fully working trial membership. |
| Cons: |
-Videos are flash streaming only: no download option.
-Picture saving nightmare: no zip files, right click disabled.
-Save images only at maximum resolution and one by one.
-It feels like a cookie-cutter social network profile.
-Site is unpolished, ugly-looking, sloppy design.
-No member forum.
-Blog and audio diary are erratically updated (once a month).
-Non-original content seen a thousand times (Matrix Nudes).
-Huge watermarks. 2 watermarks on non-original photos.
-One member chat: back in Jan/09, still announced in April.
-Chat was at Flirt 4 Free: free but requires credit card.
-Password problems: Blocked 2-3 days out of every month. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is unusual. Even though it was launched less than a year ago, it looks extremely old and unpolished. Social network profile is perhaps the best way to describe its home page. There's some emphasis on the sections you'd expect from an adult site (videos, pictures) but they've also crammed into it blocks for blog, audio blog, list of likes/dislikes, calendar, announcements, comment wall, send a message to the model and so on. Members don't get a profile, only the model does.
It looks like the model is in charge of updating the site through some program but Karlie Montana was making little use of it apart from releasing photo galleries and videos at a fairly decent rate. Two months could easily pass between blog entries. The audio blog looked interesting but she didn't make much use of it even though she only had to make a phone call to some recording system. The chat was specially a letdown: after promising it for months, when it eventually came you had to sign up for free at Flirt 4 Free but they asked for your card details. I passed. The only chat was on January 29; it took place but the announcement to "join Karlie in her first members area cam show!!" was still there in April.
Content is hard to categorize. First picture sets were masturbation or girl-girl sets from other sites: Matrix Nudes (seen at many other sites), Misha Online or Micro Babe; that amounts to around 20% of the current content. The rest might be exclusive but there's a lot of different things, usually much tamer and not always of sexual nature: behind the scenes from shoots for other companies, non-nude or topless-only sets in old ugly uncoordinated outfits, blurry self portraits pointing the digital camera at a mirror, making faces to the camera while going out, etc. Resolutions also vary a lot between updates.
Videos fit somewhat more what you'd expect from an adult site. Most include some masturbation, usually filmed by Karlie Montana herself. There are also some Matrix Nudes videos seen all over. But there are also rarities like snippets from a several days car drive with Charlie Laine and her dogs from LA to Wisconsin. Or Karlie Montana touring an hotel suite or her apartment. A 4 part interview while driving (released over a month). If you like her personality, those rarities certainly have some interest.
Trials to other solo sites from this company are pretty inexpensive. I accessed some of them and they are very similar: they share the content engine and have the same ugly ancient-looking design with slightly different equally hideous color combinations. Given the social network flare of all the sites, I feel it would make sense to offer a single membership with access to all the sites so users could interact with all the models.
As it is now, big Karlie Montana fans might enjoy it, maybe even enjoy it a lot, but the site is moving at such slow pace and in so unclear direction it's hard to recommend it to those who only have a casual interest in her. |
|
05-11-09 02:33pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
209
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Interesting info on 420. Thanks for sharing. I confess I had never come across the term until I tried to find more about the model and the 420 Wikipedia article showed up in a Google search. I'm guessing it's widely used only in English speaking countries. I'm certainly not a weed expert so I mentioned it in my comment in case someone as clueless as me was intrigued by the site name.
Regarding Kayden, I browsed her MySpace blog and I got the impression she had somehow been "expelled" from Suicide Girls a couple years ago for reasons she didn't say or I didn't see.
|
05-08-09 11:31am
|
Rating
210
|
Kayden 420
(0)
80.0
|
No Review.
|
05-07-09 01:56pm
|
Comment
211
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
|
05-07-09 01:53pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
212
|
Kelly Divine
(0)
|
|
05-23-09 01:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
213
|
Kelly Divine
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official website of American porn star Kelly Divine.
-19 videos. 1 resolution per video. 20 minutes on average.
-Resolutions varied: 320x240 400kbps (25%), 512x384 750kbps (50%), 640x480 1000kbps (25%).
-Videos were mostly hardcore boy-girl/boy-girl-girl (75%); girl-girl amounted to 25%.
-Half of the videos were interracial.
-Many pretty well known porn stars (female and male).
-Videos were a low-budget attempt at reality porn.
-8 solo photo galleries not related to the videos. 20 photos per set.
-Forum (crippled by spam) and pretty active blog in the free section. |
| Cons: |
-Bad video quality. Bitrate was too low at all resolutions.
-Photos were too small (546x364).
-Free tour only shows 2 new scenes that weren't available when I was a member.
-No anal that I could see even though Kelly Divine has done it several times.
-Trial membership no longer available.
-Interaction is possible but it's hard to find (no link to blog/forum from members section).
-A bit too simple site design. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is how the site was four months ago. I got a really cheap trial membership back in August but they are no longer offering it. I don't think I'd have joined the site at full price. Fans and completists should probably go for it, though. Additionally to the 19 videos they had in August, the members' area might have more than the couple new scenes I identified in the tour. There's also a promise of webcam shows and she blogged about having done them at least once.
It's a pity they haven't done anything to solve the spam flood in the free forum. I lurked in it for some time and it looked like a great way to interact with the model. For instance, I remember a fan asking Kelly Divine if she'd fuck a guy with a strapon; she answered she wouldn't do it for fear to hurt the guy but, a couple days later, she said a performer had contacted her willing to do a similar scene and she'd be releasing it in the members' area. I don't know for sure whether that scene was released, though. Maybe they've created a members-only forum where the interaction goes on.
As for the content, if it wasn't for its low bitrate, it wouldn't look out of place in a big-boobs reality site. They wouldn't win an Oscar for original script (repairman, pool guy, booty call, ...) but what reality site would? Female cast also included Jennifer Dark, Abbey Brooks, Ricki White or Sinnamon Love; Mark Wood, Reno or Richard Mann among the male performers. Other cast members were unknown to me. I found her scene with Richard Mann to be really good.
One thing I found weird is that the photo content was almost non-existent even though the free tour showed photos of the videos that were clearly not screen captures. I don't understand why those pictures weren't available inside the members' area. |
|
01-11-09 10:15am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
214
|
King Dong
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
This is a new Muffia site. You may get a full-access trial to Muffia if you join Reality Kings. I got one when I signed a couple months ago. Unfortunately, King Dong was not up yet then.
|
02-17-09 03:00pm
|
Review
215
|
Lisa A Daniels
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to about 10 exclusive HD boy-girl video scenes of Lisa Daniels (most with its own photo gallery).
-30 videos with a balanced mix: fair amount of hardcore boy-girl, lesbian (toys used) and solo.
-80 mostly great solo photo galleries: interesting outfits, nice settings, sexy revealing poses, toys usage.
-20 lesbian galleries and 30 Candids/BTS galleries also worth watching.
-Lisa Daniels regularly posts a diary (2 posts a month) and participates in the website forum.
-HD videos are also available at lower resolution and in split files for convenience.
-Galleries downloadable as zip files.
-No download limit noticed.
-Photo Galleries and Videos can be rated by members.
-Access to Glamour Models Gone Bad network of sites. |
| Cons: |
-Only one update per week (one video or one photo gallery).
-Latest photo galleries are merely video captures from HD videos. They are doing the same at other sites in the network.
-The male performer is the same in all boy-girl videos.
-Many of the photo galleries are also available at other sites.
-Somewhat old and cumbersome website design. Tour section has a much more modern look.
-Varying quality: videos from HD 1280x720 to 320x240; photo galleries from crisp quality 1700x1200 to HD video captures or blurry 1000x600.
-Membership is, in fact, usable at more sites than those listed but you have to find them on your own (for instance, Shay Laren or Club Anita). |
| Bottom Line: |
Lisa Daniels fans will find a fair amount of interesting never before seen content although the quality suffers sometimes as it has been generated over a very long period of time and comes from many different sources.
The update rate doesn't make it worth staying for more than a month except for the die-hard ones or those who will use other sites at Glamour Models Gone Bad. |
|
04-19-08 08:08am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
216
|
Lisa A Daniels
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
As of today, there are 29 videos of varying quality. 6 of the last ones are at 1280x720 (300-700 mb each), some of the old ones are 320x240 but most are at 640x480. Length is 10-15 minutes. The content of the videos is about one third solo, one third lesbian, one third boy-girl and they are quite good.
Very poor update rate, though. Lately, you get one HD video every two weeks and a "photo gallery" consisting of video captures from next week's video the week in between. You also get access to Glamour Models Gone Bad, Amateurs Gone Bad and all related model sites (Shay Laren, Crissy Moran, ...).
|
04-19-08 05:38am
|
Reply
217
|
Live Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks indeed for your reply. I got comfort in knowing I'm not the only one who is confused about that sign up page. Looks like a very interesting site but it's a pity they don't realize what they are doing wrong.
|
03-19-12 03:29pm
|
Comment
218
|
Live Gonzo
(0)
|
|
03-17-12 04:49am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
219
|
Live Jasmin
(0)
|
|
04-30-11 09:42am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
220
|
Live Jasmin
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I've also checked sometimes a model simultaneously at Live Jasmin and other sites and confess I've never found much of a difference in quality apart from aspect ratios and slightly different video sizes. Maybe the fact that Live Jasmin is a European site and most models that work at both places are European has something to do with your perceived quality.
I'm not 100% sure how models are able to stream simultaneously through different networks, but it's most likely achieved by some software that sends the stream to various sites. For practical reasons, I'd discard them having various cameras.
On the other hand, what Live Jasmin claims to be "HD" is quite lacking compared to some of the "HD"s at Cam Crush (a clone of Streamate.com, btw); but the best qualities I've seen there are usually from US models, who are not available at Live Jasmin.
|
11-20-10 01:15am
|
Review
221
|
Live Jasmin
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-100s of models from Eastern Europe and South America.
-Cheap privates: most at 1.99 per minute; few at 0.99 or 2.49+.
-All models state in their profile what's OK for them in private.
-Fast navigation and search. Feeds start almost immediately.
-Very good image quality (above average).
-Forum for users to discuss models and review private shows.
-Most models can be seen for free before going private.
-Any surfer may see free shows and participate in free chat.
-6 payment options though none of the usual adult ones.
-Recurring membership option to access additional features.
-Constantly adding new features to improve user experience:
--Mouseover on model at results page to see show preview.
--3 different results views: compact, big thumbnail, text details.
--RSS feed to notify when favorites come online.
--Facebook-like profile page for performers and users. |
| Cons: |
-Regional pricing. 50% more expensive in Europe.
-No indication of time spent/credits left while in private.
-Recent chat history/money spent goes back only 15 days.
-Models often wait some time before starting the show.
-Many creepy rooms: dolls, teddy bears, kid decorations.
-Non-exclusive models; found at the same time at other sites.
-Models seem to be mostly at cam studios, not their home.
-Red background is hideous: looks old, makes you wanna run.
-Almost no models from the US or Western Europe.
-Members chat is pointless: models rarely answer.
-Non-members/guests in free chat produce lots of noise.
-Same model may have several different profiles: confusion.
-No recording options for shows.
-Very impersonal. Maybe new facebook style will help.
-Who is Jasmin? |
| Bottom Line: |
A recent review here prompted me to give this site a try. I was a bit reluctant initially because, even though they offer up to 6 different payment systems, none was an adult processor I recognized. Also, the weird name of the site and that impossible red background made me feel the site was some relic from the internet cam scene past.
This seems to be, in fact, a very lively cam site and, leaving apart the site's look, one of the most technically advanced I've seen. In fact, they keep on adding features that make browsing and searching for performers more convenient. They have also very recently given a kind of facebook style to the performers profile, integrating in a "wall" the reviews they used to have in separate forum, the model's pictures and presentation, etc and adding some new model-users interaction features. I personally don't see the point since most models aren't exclusive to this site and I doubt they will participate more than they already did but maybe things will change. Users may now also have a profile page stating their tastes, etc. which, if models are able to see it, might be convenient to speed up private shows.
The main drawback I've found in private chats is that you get no indication of time spent and models often take some time before they start the show. Some times, they use the old trick of typing questions for a while. Other times, they keep on going through the free show motions for up to a minute until they suddenly realize they are in private and start the show; I don't know if it's an act or that, since they are obviously working at the same time at several cam sites, the system they have in place doesn't notify them properly or takes some time to close the connections to other sites. It's not a feed delay issue because there's no delay in chat once she acknowledges your presence.
On a side note, even though I noticed many models at other sites simultaneously, all the multi-site models I found had the lowest price per minute at Live Jasmin, even after taking regional pricing into account.
There's also a recurring membership option available that costs 15 USD/EUR every 15 days and gives you some additional features like messaging to performers, being singled out in chats and lifting the favorites cap to 96 from the 24 that non-members get. It's probably not worth the money unless you're really into this site and want an expanded experience. |
|
11-15-09 04:29am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
222
|
Luscious Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
English is not my mother tongue; I try to be very verbose so the meaning doesn't get lost in case I use a weird wording in a particular sentence. The praise means a lot coming from you.
|
11-17-09 12:05pm
|
Review
223
|
Luscious Lopez
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Official site of US porn star Luscious Lopez aka Dasha.
-Exclusive material. Except for solo sites from other models.
-A bit of everything: anal, big tits, interracial, threesomes, ...
-53 main scenes plus their photo galleries and bonus scenes.
-10+ standalone solo Luscious Lopez scenes.
-Max. video resolution: 640x480 WMV, 2000kbps, 20 minutes.
-Interesting BTS content and bonus scenes.
-1600x1200 picture. Zips. 80 per set. 50% landscape.
-Easy access to alternate content from scene (gallery, BTS).
-Release date and small description on most update lists.
-Inexpensive unlimited one week trial.
-ccbill. No regional pricing. |
| Cons: |
-Sporadic updates: currently, about 1 new scene per month.
-Good metadata but no search engine or model index.
-Scenes under 4 broad categories: main, solo, bonus and friends.
-No way to find other scenes from models in the scene.
-Pictures' composition is rarely good.
-No interaction with model but an email form and Myspace link.
-No user forum, no webcam chats, no blog, no candids, ...
-Old-looking design even though site is only 2 years old.
-Uninformative free tour: list of 10 most recent updates only. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'd been a member a couple years ago and I got a very good impression. I'd been keeping an eye on the update list in the free tour for some time and decided to join when update rate seemed to be catching up speed last summer. Currently, though, it looks like they are back to about one update a month. On a side note, I think it's a mistake that the update list in the free tour is limited to the 10 most recent ones: I'm sure they would make a somewhat better impression if they showed all that's available inside, even if the updates are so sporadic.
The main attraction of the site are the videos. Despite some budget limitations in terms of settings, the cast includes well known models like Gianna Michaels, Kelly Divine, Sara Jay or Sophie Dee to name just 4. There's also a lot of variety in male talent, including top performers like Jack Napier, Marco Banderas or Mr. Pete. No one but Luscious Lopez appears in more than a 3-4 scenes, which is always good. Scenes are also quite diverse. According to some of the BTS scenes and what I've seen around, my guess is that the scenes are only available here or at the solo sites from other cast members. Pictures aren't that well shot on average so, despite the decent size, they serve for little but getting an idea of what's in the video. There are also some somewhat better solo photo galleries without videos.
What stands out the most for me is some of the BTS content. You really get the feel of how they shoot a porno, probably even more than the regular behind the scenes from DVDs. How they care for continuity, how some guy has real trouble staying hard and continuously asks the girls to blow him to get wood, the lengths they go to prepare for a minute of anal scene. Luscious Lopez has an interesting personality and at least you see some of it through this content. Wish the site offered some interaction too.
One thing I liked is that it's possible to find all the related content from a particular scene: video scene, bonus scenes, BTS and various photo galleries are all linked among them. Contrary to similar solo sites which, for some reason, always dump the photos and videos in separate listings and you have to puzzle the pairings by yourself. Even though, it's a pity they have such a broad categorization, listing scenes only under 4 different categories. Scenes' descriptions have an Action section that looks like some quick tagging system ("Anal, POV", "Lesbian, Toys" or "Threesome, Outdoors") but it serves little purpose since they don't have a search engine to exploit that info. At least, they clearly put aside scenes without Luscious Lopez in a friends section.
As far as solo sites of US porn stars that aren't linked to major companies go, this is a pretty reasonable site. If you're interested in seeing interesting never before seen content of Luscious Lopez, going for the trial membership is a no-brainer. |
|
11-16-09 03:03pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
224
|
Luscious Lopez
(0)
|
|
04-21-08 02:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
225
|
Mariah XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
Thanks. This site isn't an exception. Almost no US site takes into account time zones when scheduling shows. I wasn't planning on joining: it's just that 24/7 spy cams are are something I used to enjoy in the past and I was wondering whether they worked here.
|
02-21-09 10:59am
|
|
