| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I was a big fan of the site but on December 29, 2005 - a date which will live in infamy - the model known as Jacie suddenly and deliberately appeared at femjoy.com FULLY CLOTHED. Since that date the site has shown many models clothed and/or semi-clothed.
|
12-15-11 06:44am
|
Reply
2
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Bumble B's Review
You're overstating it to say 99% outdoors and complete nude. I assume you refer to the older sets? I'm a regular member of the site and the more recent photo sets and videos (2009-2010) actually have too much clothing! I wish they would go back to full nudity ALL the time.
|
04-28-10 06:29am
|
Reply
3
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Review
I am a current Femjoy member. A couple of items in this review need to be addressed. First, a thumbs up because although the 4000 px standard is still the norm, I've recently started seeing some sets as high as 5000 px. Second, the "99% nude girls from the first image" statement is no longer true. The site changed about 3 years ago and went through a major watering down (A BIG thumbs down in that respect). The site is now more like 75% nude from the first image. They have gone so far to the other extreme that I have seen pics where the model is completely clothed. I've been a member for a while simply because I haven't been able to find any other sites with more extreme nudity.
|
04-28-09 08:07am
|
Comment
4
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
06-30-08 07:57am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
5
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
|
09-30-08 08:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
6
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
|
03-05-12 07:11am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
7
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
Xororos's Review
I'm curious about the video quality that I see in the free daily preview. Are those videos standard membership quality or gold membership quality?
|
04-05-09 09:01pm
|
